acupse-10-esguerra
DESCRIPTION
ahkfjvhdgmcfjgjgvTRANSCRIPT
-
Job creation:
21 July 2010
-
Layunin nating paramihin angtrabaho dito sa ating bansa Pres. Benigno C. Aquino III, Inaugural Address, 31 June 2010
Mahigit anim na milyong trabaho, kung maaari sampung milyongtrabaho Pres. Gloria M. Arroyo, Inaugural Address, 30 June 2004
-
Sa abot ng aking makakayabibigyannatin ang masa ng hanapbuhay at dangal sa araw-araw Pres. Joseph E. Estrada, Inaugural Address, 30 June 1998
We must get the entire economy to generate productive employment keeping in mind that for each citizen, a job means not merely material income, but social usefulness and self-Pres. Fidel V. Ramos, Inaugural Address, 30 June 1992
-
Wages and salaries account for 54 percent of household income. (FIES 2006) 41 percent of households depend on wages and salaries for at least 50 percent of their income. (FIES 2006) Income from self-employment is which understates the importance of labor income for majority of households.
-
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
14.00
Percen
t
Unemployment rate, 1998-2009
-
Unemployment in selected Southeast Asian countries, 2007-2008
Country Labor Force UnemploymentParticipation RateRate
Indonesia 67.5 8.4Malaysia 62.4 3.2Philippines 64.9 7.4Singapore 63.6 3.2Thailand 72.5 1.4
-
Unemployment by age group, 2009
Age group Labor Force Unemployment Share(in thousands) Rate
All 37,892 7.5 100.015-24 8,168 17.6 50.825-34 10,072 8.3 29.535-44 8,416 3.2 9.545-54 6,364 2.8 6.355-64 3,401 2.7 3.265+ 1,472 1.3 0.7
-
Regional unemployment rate
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0
National Capital Region
Cordillera Admininistrative Region
Ilocos Region
Cagayan Valley
Central Luzon
CALABARZON
MIMAROPA
Bicol Region
Western Visayas
Central Visayas
Eastern Visayas
Zamboanga Peninsula
Northern Mindanao
Davao Region
SOCCSKSARGEN
Caraga
ARMM
2008
2004
Source: Yearbook of Labor Statistics, 2009.
-
Poverty, labor force participation, and unemployment
1998 2006Poor Non-poor Poor Non-poor
Out of labor force 19.2 80.8 26.8 73.2Unemployed 17.4 82.6 20.5 79.4
-
Unemployment by educational attainment, 2008
Educational Labor Force Unemployment ShareAttainment (in thousands)RateAll 36,805 7.4 100.0No grade 660 2.1 0.5Elementary 11,425 3.3 14.0High school 14,457 8.6 45.5College + 10,263 10.6 39.9
-
Regional underemployment rate
Source: Yearbook of Labor Statistics, 2009.
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0
National Capital Region
Cordillera Admininistrative Region
Ilocos Region
Cagayan Valley
Central Luzon
CALABARZON
MIMAROPA
Bicol Region
Western Visayas
Central Visayas
Eastern Visayas
Zamboanga Peninsula
Northern Mindanao
Davao Region
SOCCSKSARGEN
Caraga
ARMM
2008
2004
-
-2.0%
-1.0%
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
7.0%
8.0%
Growth of GDP and aggregate employment, 1999-2009
Employment
GDP
-
Employment by sector and class of worker 2003-2009
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
TOTAL EMPLOYMENT (in '000) 30,635 31,613 32,313 32,636 33,560 34,089 35,061
BY SECTOR (shares)Agriculture, Fishing, & Forestry 37 36 36 36 35 35 34 Industry 16 16 16 15 15 15 15 Manufacturing 10 10 10 9 9 9 8 Services 48 48 48 49 50 50 51
BY CLASS OF WORKER (shares)Wage & Salary Workers 50 52 50 51 52 52 53 Self-Employed 38 37 37 37 36 35 35 Unpaid Family Workers 12 11 12 12 12 12 12
Source: Philippine Industry Yearbook of Labor Statistics (2008), Current Labor Statistics (April 2010)
-
Labor market mismatches
2 in every 5 establishments have job openingsApproximately 1/3 (or 35.3%) of which are -to-
Hard-to-Fill Vacancies Defined as vacancies for which establishments found difficulties in recruitment
-
BLES-K> ^,:April 2010
1 out of 4 hard to fill vacancies is for a professional worker
Top 10 Hard-to-Fill Vacancies (Professionals)
1 Accountants2 Systems analysts & designers3 Electrical engineers4 Computer programmers5 Computer engineers6 Mechanical engineers7 Chemical engineers8 HRD professionals9 Electronics & communications engineers
10 Industrial engineers
Next Top 10 Hard-to-Fill Vacancies (Professionals)
11 Medical technologists12 Civil engineers13 Journalists/writers14 Pharmacists15 Architects16 Chemists17 Librarians/archivists18 Medical doctors19 Geologists and geophysicists20 Social work professionals
-
BLES-K> ^,:April 2010
12.7% of hard-to-fill vacancies are for technicians and associate professionals
Top 5 Hard-to-Fill Vacancies (Technicians and Associate Professions)
1 Mechanical engineering technicians2 Aircraft pilots, navigators and flight engineers3 Bookkeepers4 Social work associate professionals5 Air traffic safety technicians
-
BLES-K> ^,:April 2010
Nearly half of the hard-to-fill vacancies are for clerks
Top 5 Hard-to-Fill Vacancies (Clerks)1 Call center agents2 Cashiers & ticket clerks3 Accounting & bookkeeping clerks4 Data entry operators5 Medical transcriptionists
-
BLES-K> ^,:April 2010
Recruitment Criteria & Practices: College degree is a minimum requirement. Years of work experience is a big advantage in job search. Network of friends/relatives/neighbors and classified adsare the most dominant modes of recruitment.
School preference is not important in recruitment. Employers have high regard for the readiness.
-
Employment insecurityPercentage disagreeing or strongly disagreeingD (Source: Green, 2009)
-
Difficulty of job replacement and worry about job loss Source: Green, 2009)
-
010,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
ESTABLISHMENTS Resorting to Permanent Closure (L)DISPLACED WORKERS (R )
Establishments Resorting to Permanent Closure/RetrenchmentDue to Economic Reasons and Permanently Displaced Workers
Source: Yearbook of Labor Statistics, 2008.
-
Establishments resorting to permanent closure/retrenchment (by reason)
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
REASONS 3,262 2,008 2,943 2,979 2,468
Lack of Market 720 419 505 498 325
Uncompetitive Price of Product 27 25 40 30 10
Competition from Imported Products 12 7 10 16 11
High Cost of Production 88 75 92 72 75
Lack of Capital 111 70 91 67 44
Peso Depreciation 4 3 4 - 4
Financial Losses 431 339 526 690 443
Economic Crisis 24 18 20 16 5
Reorganization/Downsizing/Redundancy 1,566 904 1,343 1,302 1,265
Change in Management/Merger 97 43 70 65 49
Lack of Raw Materials 28 17 25 20 12
Minimum Wage Rate Increase 5 3 40 22 15
Others 149 85 177 181 210
INDICATOREstablishments Reporting
Source: Yearbook of Labor Statistics, 2008.
-
Permanently displaced workers (by reason)
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
REASONS 67,977 36,163 57,594 59,376 51,125
Lack of Market 22,734 9,932 11,146 14,947 7,458
Uncompetitive Price of Product 829 1,857 1,523 1,089 282
Competition from Imported Products 150 117 175 519 757
High Cost of Production 3,421 1,970 2,062 1,231 2,019
Lack of Capital 1,810 968 2,511 1,603 1,585
Peso Depreciation 58 48 25 - 338
Financial Losses 9,222 7,134 11,601 13,133 12,066
Economic Crisis 655 118 697 414 138
Reorganization/Downsizing/Redundancy 18,788 9,452 14,103 15,981 17,350
Change in Management/Merger 2,666 1,705 5,253 2,196 1,864
Lack of Raw Materials 1,626 890 5,461 1,148 569
Minimum Wage Rate Increase 78 54 580 457 484
Others 5,940 1,918 2,457 6,658 6,215
INDICATORDisplaced Workers
Source: Yearbook of Labor Statistics, 2008.
-
0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000
National Capital Region
Cordillera Administrative Region
Ilocos Region
Cagayan Valley
Central Luzon
CALABARZON
MIMAROPA
Bicol Region
Western Visayas
Central Visayas
Eastern Visayas
Western Mindanao
Northern Mindanao
Southern Mindanao
Central Mindanao
Caraga
Permanently Displaced Workers by Region, 2009 (preliminary)
Source: Yearbook of Labor Statistics, 2009.
-
0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
Permanently Displaced Workers by Industry
Wholesale and Retail Trade, Repair of Motor Vehicles, Motorcycles and Personal and Household GoodsManufacturing
Agriculture, Hunting and Forestry
ALL INDUSTRIES
Source: Yearbook of Labor Statistics, 2008.
-
Accession & separation ratesNCR, 2003-2008
Source: BLES, Current Labor Statistics, various years.
6.827.12
8.66
9.22
10.4710.75
9.38
6.76
6.09
7.67 7.7 7.64
8.37 8.4
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Accession rate Separation rate
-
Labor turnover rate, NCR 2003-2008
Source: BLES, Current Labor Statistics, various years.
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Turnover Rate = (Accession Rate - Separation Rate)
-
Labor turnover rate, NCR 2003-2008
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Due to replacement
Due to expansion
Accession Rate
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Employer-initiatedEmployee-initiated
Separation Rate
Source: BLES, Current Labor Statistics, various years.
-
Insecurity in employment is popularly associated with the use of short-term, contingent, low-paying contracts.
86 percent of 1200 firms (PLFS, 2000) 30 percent of 2.5 million workers in establishments with more than 20 workers (BLES, 2004)
28 percent of rank-and-file employees are non-regular (BLES 2008)
-
Insecurity also depends upon the ease of finding a job that is comparable to the present one.
Displaced workers have a low re-absorption rate and options limited to short-term jobs.
A high percentage either become unemployed or prematurely exit the labor force making re-absorption more difficult.
Exit from labor force becomes permanent with skills deterioration.
-
Human capital investment is key to employment security.
The best insurance against permanent job loss is lifelong education and training.
But this needs to be complemented by a labor market information system and some form of income support to mitigate losses arising from job separations.
-
Labor market flexibility is equated with job insecurity in the Philippines because of the dominance of numerical flexibility as a strategy to adjust to competition.
&states which underwrite a supportive social Z
-
Do labor regulations inhibit job creation?
Most common are : minimum wages and employment protection
Minimum wage still an intensely debated issue in the Philippines
Employment protection: some laborcontracts are considered illegal (labor-only contracting); employees have to be employer
-
Level of minimum wages in 2007 (PPP US$)
WDtth highest out of 130 (among top 50%)
Source: ILO, March 2009
-
Levels of minimum wages relative to GDP per capita: developing &
transition economies
Source: ILO, March 2009
-
Wages and minimum wages (monthly levels in local currency, 2002/2004)
Source: Saget (2008)
-
`MWs that seem far too high to be considered reasonable
`Maxi MWs the MW is too high to be considered as a genuine MW Causes: MW negotiation tends to become a platform for actual wage negotiations, reinforced by system of exemptions
D
-
Limited only to wage and salary workers in private establishments (which is about half of the employed) and family-operated activities
Scope of Philippine minimum wages
Employed Persons by Class of Workers (Share to total), 1991-2007
Source: NSO Labor Force Surveys
Around 75% worked for private establishments (roughly a third of
the total employed); the rest worked for government
Around 12% are employers
Employed persons by class of workersshare to total, 1991-2007
-
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
r20
07
in p
erce
nt
Wage and Salary Workers Own-account workers Unpaid Family workers
-
Class of worker Poor Non-poor
Wage and salary 39.8 50.9
Self-employed 40.9 37.1
Unpaid family worker 19.3 12.0
Total 100.0 100.0
Population in thousands 6,336 20,951
Poverty and employment by class of worker (1998, in percent)
-
Exemptions and non-complianceWorkers in micro, cottage, and small Small and medium enterprises (SMEs) comprise 99.6% of all registered business in the Philippines and employ 70% of the workforce (NSCB, 2001)
The analysis of geographic distribution of enterprises throughout the country indicates a high concentration in the National Capital Region (NCR), which accounts for 24.4% of all establishments and 40.1% of all employees.
Part-time workers
Scope of Philippine minimum wages
-
^
38% of non-agricultural workers receive wages lower than MW; 78% in agriculture
Close to 50% in 15-24 age group earn below the MW By sector, proportions below MW areWholesale and retail trade 50%Manufacturing at least 30% Transport, communication and storage above 30%
Community, social and personal services 27-32% NCR increased after 2005
-
Views on the minimum wage
Dt in fact it has been set beyond that level; viewed as second to the most problematic among labor policies after restrictions on worker termination (Sicat, 2009). Firms without fiscal incentives, those with export orientation, domestically owned, of larger size, and younger tended to have stronger views against the current minimum wage policy.
-
Views on the minimum wage
Organized labor: mixed views from abolition of RTWPBs to across-the-board wage legislation; MW policy has too many objectives, need to agree on what it is for: a wage bargaining)
But if safety net, there should be no exemptions; however, level should be subject of negotiation.
-
Minimum wage effects
Few studies in developing Asia (e.g. Indonesia); negligible in Philippines
Aside from employment and income distribution effects, there are also effects on unions, CBAs, and inflation.
-
Effect of an increase in minimum wages: transition matrix
Household heads and spouses (national)
July 2006below
minimum wage
within minimum
wage
above minimum
wageself employed unemployed not in the labor force Total
below minimum wage 425 16 54 108 18 34 655within minimum wage 63 72 37 15 9 6 202above minimum wage 76 47 590 57 11 17 798Total 564 135 681 180 38 57 1,655
January 2007
Household heads and spouses (national), percent
July 2006below
minimum wage
within minimum
wage
above minimum
wage
self employed unemployed
not in the labor force Total
below minimum wage 65% 2% 8% 16% 3% 5% 100%within minimum wage 31% 36% 18% 7% 4% 3% 100%above minimum wage 10% 6% 74% 7% 1% 2% 100%Total 34% 8% 41% 11% 2% 3% 100%
January 2007
-
Effect of an increase in minimum wages: transition matrix
Household heads and spouses (non-agriculture)
July 2006below
minimum wage
within minimum
wage
above minimum
wageself employed unemployed not in the labor force Total
below minimum wage 222 14 41 45 11 18 351within minimum wage 59 66 36 11 8 6 186above minimum wage 59 45 564 48 10 17 743Total 340 125 641 104 29 41 1,280
January 2007
Household heads and spouses (non-agriculture), percent
July 2006below
minimum wage
within minimum
wage
above minimum
wage
self employed unemployed
not in the labor force Total
below minimum wage 63% 4% 12% 13% 3% 5% 100%within minimum wage 32% 35% 19% 6% 4% 3% 100%above minimum wage 8% 6% 76% 6% 1% 2% 100%Total 27% 10% 50% 8% 2% 3% 100%
January 2007
-
Effect of an increase in minimum wages: transition matrix
Household heads and spouses (manufacturing)
July 2006below
minimum wage
within minimum
wage
above minimum
wageself employed unemployed not in the labor force Total
below minimum wage 50 2 9 6 3 9 79within minimum wage 19 25 10 0 1 2 57above minimum wage 12 8 134 7 2 6 169Total 81 35 153 13 6 17 305
January 2007
Household heads and spouses (manufacturing), percent
July 2006below
minimum wage
within minimum
wage
above minimum
wage
self employed unemployed
not in the labor force Total
below minimum wage 63% 3% 11% 8% 4% 11% 100%within minimum wage 33% 44% 18% 0% 2% 4% 100%above minimum wage 7% 5% 79% 4% 1% 4% 100%Total 27% 11% 50% 4% 2% 6% 100%
January 2007
-
Effect of an increase in minimum wages: transition matrix
Household heads and spouses (production/laborers)
July 2006below
minimum wage
within minimum
wage
above minimum
wageself employed unemployed not in the labor force Total
below minimum wage 123 7 26 30 7 11 204within minimum wage 44 45 23 9 6 5 132above minimum wage 35 32 244 31 6 9 357Total 202 84 293 70 19 25 693
January 2007
Household heads and spouses (production/laborers), percent
July 2006below
minimum wage
within minimum
wage
above minimum
wage
self employed unemployed
not in the labor force Total
below minimum wage 60% 3% 13% 15% 3% 5% 100%within minimum wage 33% 34% 17% 7% 5% 4% 100%above minimum wage 10% 9% 68% 9% 2% 3% 100%Total 29% 12% 42% 10% 3% 4% 100%
January 2007
-
Thank You!
21 July 2010