acupse-10-esguerra

Upload: aaca

Post on 06-Mar-2016

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

ahkfjvhdgmcfjgjgv

TRANSCRIPT

  • Job creation:

    21 July 2010

  • Layunin nating paramihin angtrabaho dito sa ating bansa Pres. Benigno C. Aquino III, Inaugural Address, 31 June 2010

    Mahigit anim na milyong trabaho, kung maaari sampung milyongtrabaho Pres. Gloria M. Arroyo, Inaugural Address, 30 June 2004

  • Sa abot ng aking makakayabibigyannatin ang masa ng hanapbuhay at dangal sa araw-araw Pres. Joseph E. Estrada, Inaugural Address, 30 June 1998

    We must get the entire economy to generate productive employment keeping in mind that for each citizen, a job means not merely material income, but social usefulness and self-Pres. Fidel V. Ramos, Inaugural Address, 30 June 1992

  • Wages and salaries account for 54 percent of household income. (FIES 2006) 41 percent of households depend on wages and salaries for at least 50 percent of their income. (FIES 2006) Income from self-employment is which understates the importance of labor income for majority of households.

  • 0.00

    2.00

    4.00

    6.00

    8.00

    10.00

    12.00

    14.00

    Percen

    t

    Unemployment rate, 1998-2009

  • Unemployment in selected Southeast Asian countries, 2007-2008

    Country Labor Force UnemploymentParticipation RateRate

    Indonesia 67.5 8.4Malaysia 62.4 3.2Philippines 64.9 7.4Singapore 63.6 3.2Thailand 72.5 1.4

  • Unemployment by age group, 2009

    Age group Labor Force Unemployment Share(in thousands) Rate

    All 37,892 7.5 100.015-24 8,168 17.6 50.825-34 10,072 8.3 29.535-44 8,416 3.2 9.545-54 6,364 2.8 6.355-64 3,401 2.7 3.265+ 1,472 1.3 0.7

  • Regional unemployment rate

    0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0

    National Capital Region

    Cordillera Admininistrative Region

    Ilocos Region

    Cagayan Valley

    Central Luzon

    CALABARZON

    MIMAROPA

    Bicol Region

    Western Visayas

    Central Visayas

    Eastern Visayas

    Zamboanga Peninsula

    Northern Mindanao

    Davao Region

    SOCCSKSARGEN

    Caraga

    ARMM

    2008

    2004

    Source: Yearbook of Labor Statistics, 2009.

  • Poverty, labor force participation, and unemployment

    1998 2006Poor Non-poor Poor Non-poor

    Out of labor force 19.2 80.8 26.8 73.2Unemployed 17.4 82.6 20.5 79.4

  • Unemployment by educational attainment, 2008

    Educational Labor Force Unemployment ShareAttainment (in thousands)RateAll 36,805 7.4 100.0No grade 660 2.1 0.5Elementary 11,425 3.3 14.0High school 14,457 8.6 45.5College + 10,263 10.6 39.9

  • Regional underemployment rate

    Source: Yearbook of Labor Statistics, 2009.

    0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0

    National Capital Region

    Cordillera Admininistrative Region

    Ilocos Region

    Cagayan Valley

    Central Luzon

    CALABARZON

    MIMAROPA

    Bicol Region

    Western Visayas

    Central Visayas

    Eastern Visayas

    Zamboanga Peninsula

    Northern Mindanao

    Davao Region

    SOCCSKSARGEN

    Caraga

    ARMM

    2008

    2004

  • -2.0%

    -1.0%

    0.0%

    1.0%

    2.0%

    3.0%

    4.0%

    5.0%

    6.0%

    7.0%

    8.0%

    Growth of GDP and aggregate employment, 1999-2009

    Employment

    GDP

  • Employment by sector and class of worker 2003-2009

    2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

    TOTAL EMPLOYMENT (in '000) 30,635 31,613 32,313 32,636 33,560 34,089 35,061

    BY SECTOR (shares)Agriculture, Fishing, & Forestry 37 36 36 36 35 35 34 Industry 16 16 16 15 15 15 15 Manufacturing 10 10 10 9 9 9 8 Services 48 48 48 49 50 50 51

    BY CLASS OF WORKER (shares)Wage & Salary Workers 50 52 50 51 52 52 53 Self-Employed 38 37 37 37 36 35 35 Unpaid Family Workers 12 11 12 12 12 12 12

    Source: Philippine Industry Yearbook of Labor Statistics (2008), Current Labor Statistics (April 2010)

  • Labor market mismatches

    2 in every 5 establishments have job openingsApproximately 1/3 (or 35.3%) of which are -to-

    Hard-to-Fill Vacancies Defined as vacancies for which establishments found difficulties in recruitment

  • BLES-K> ^,:April 2010

    1 out of 4 hard to fill vacancies is for a professional worker

    Top 10 Hard-to-Fill Vacancies (Professionals)

    1 Accountants2 Systems analysts & designers3 Electrical engineers4 Computer programmers5 Computer engineers6 Mechanical engineers7 Chemical engineers8 HRD professionals9 Electronics & communications engineers

    10 Industrial engineers

    Next Top 10 Hard-to-Fill Vacancies (Professionals)

    11 Medical technologists12 Civil engineers13 Journalists/writers14 Pharmacists15 Architects16 Chemists17 Librarians/archivists18 Medical doctors19 Geologists and geophysicists20 Social work professionals

  • BLES-K> ^,:April 2010

    12.7% of hard-to-fill vacancies are for technicians and associate professionals

    Top 5 Hard-to-Fill Vacancies (Technicians and Associate Professions)

    1 Mechanical engineering technicians2 Aircraft pilots, navigators and flight engineers3 Bookkeepers4 Social work associate professionals5 Air traffic safety technicians

  • BLES-K> ^,:April 2010

    Nearly half of the hard-to-fill vacancies are for clerks

    Top 5 Hard-to-Fill Vacancies (Clerks)1 Call center agents2 Cashiers & ticket clerks3 Accounting & bookkeeping clerks4 Data entry operators5 Medical transcriptionists

  • BLES-K> ^,:April 2010

    Recruitment Criteria & Practices: College degree is a minimum requirement. Years of work experience is a big advantage in job search. Network of friends/relatives/neighbors and classified adsare the most dominant modes of recruitment.

    School preference is not important in recruitment. Employers have high regard for the readiness.

  • Employment insecurityPercentage disagreeing or strongly disagreeingD (Source: Green, 2009)

  • Difficulty of job replacement and worry about job loss Source: Green, 2009)

  • 010,000

    20,000

    30,000

    40,000

    50,000

    60,000

    70,000

    80,000

    0

    500

    1,000

    1,500

    2,000

    2,500

    3,000

    3,500

    2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

    ESTABLISHMENTS Resorting to Permanent Closure (L)DISPLACED WORKERS (R )

    Establishments Resorting to Permanent Closure/RetrenchmentDue to Economic Reasons and Permanently Displaced Workers

    Source: Yearbook of Labor Statistics, 2008.

  • Establishments resorting to permanent closure/retrenchment (by reason)

    2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

    REASONS 3,262 2,008 2,943 2,979 2,468

    Lack of Market 720 419 505 498 325

    Uncompetitive Price of Product 27 25 40 30 10

    Competition from Imported Products 12 7 10 16 11

    High Cost of Production 88 75 92 72 75

    Lack of Capital 111 70 91 67 44

    Peso Depreciation 4 3 4 - 4

    Financial Losses 431 339 526 690 443

    Economic Crisis 24 18 20 16 5

    Reorganization/Downsizing/Redundancy 1,566 904 1,343 1,302 1,265

    Change in Management/Merger 97 43 70 65 49

    Lack of Raw Materials 28 17 25 20 12

    Minimum Wage Rate Increase 5 3 40 22 15

    Others 149 85 177 181 210

    INDICATOREstablishments Reporting

    Source: Yearbook of Labor Statistics, 2008.

  • Permanently displaced workers (by reason)

    2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

    REASONS 67,977 36,163 57,594 59,376 51,125

    Lack of Market 22,734 9,932 11,146 14,947 7,458

    Uncompetitive Price of Product 829 1,857 1,523 1,089 282

    Competition from Imported Products 150 117 175 519 757

    High Cost of Production 3,421 1,970 2,062 1,231 2,019

    Lack of Capital 1,810 968 2,511 1,603 1,585

    Peso Depreciation 58 48 25 - 338

    Financial Losses 9,222 7,134 11,601 13,133 12,066

    Economic Crisis 655 118 697 414 138

    Reorganization/Downsizing/Redundancy 18,788 9,452 14,103 15,981 17,350

    Change in Management/Merger 2,666 1,705 5,253 2,196 1,864

    Lack of Raw Materials 1,626 890 5,461 1,148 569

    Minimum Wage Rate Increase 78 54 580 457 484

    Others 5,940 1,918 2,457 6,658 6,215

    INDICATORDisplaced Workers

    Source: Yearbook of Labor Statistics, 2008.

  • 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000

    National Capital Region

    Cordillera Administrative Region

    Ilocos Region

    Cagayan Valley

    Central Luzon

    CALABARZON

    MIMAROPA

    Bicol Region

    Western Visayas

    Central Visayas

    Eastern Visayas

    Western Mindanao

    Northern Mindanao

    Southern Mindanao

    Central Mindanao

    Caraga

    Permanently Displaced Workers by Region, 2009 (preliminary)

    Source: Yearbook of Labor Statistics, 2009.

  • 0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000

    2003

    2004

    2005

    2006

    2007

    Permanently Displaced Workers by Industry

    Wholesale and Retail Trade, Repair of Motor Vehicles, Motorcycles and Personal and Household GoodsManufacturing

    Agriculture, Hunting and Forestry

    ALL INDUSTRIES

    Source: Yearbook of Labor Statistics, 2008.

  • Accession & separation ratesNCR, 2003-2008

    Source: BLES, Current Labor Statistics, various years.

    6.827.12

    8.66

    9.22

    10.4710.75

    9.38

    6.76

    6.09

    7.67 7.7 7.64

    8.37 8.4

    2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

    Accession rate Separation rate

  • Labor turnover rate, NCR 2003-2008

    Source: BLES, Current Labor Statistics, various years.

    0

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    3

    2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

    Turnover Rate = (Accession Rate - Separation Rate)

  • Labor turnover rate, NCR 2003-2008

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

    Due to replacement

    Due to expansion

    Accession Rate

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

    Employer-initiatedEmployee-initiated

    Separation Rate

    Source: BLES, Current Labor Statistics, various years.

  • Insecurity in employment is popularly associated with the use of short-term, contingent, low-paying contracts.

    86 percent of 1200 firms (PLFS, 2000) 30 percent of 2.5 million workers in establishments with more than 20 workers (BLES, 2004)

    28 percent of rank-and-file employees are non-regular (BLES 2008)

  • Insecurity also depends upon the ease of finding a job that is comparable to the present one.

    Displaced workers have a low re-absorption rate and options limited to short-term jobs.

    A high percentage either become unemployed or prematurely exit the labor force making re-absorption more difficult.

    Exit from labor force becomes permanent with skills deterioration.

  • Human capital investment is key to employment security.

    The best insurance against permanent job loss is lifelong education and training.

    But this needs to be complemented by a labor market information system and some form of income support to mitigate losses arising from job separations.

  • Labor market flexibility is equated with job insecurity in the Philippines because of the dominance of numerical flexibility as a strategy to adjust to competition.

    &states which underwrite a supportive social Z

  • Do labor regulations inhibit job creation?

    Most common are : minimum wages and employment protection

    Minimum wage still an intensely debated issue in the Philippines

    Employment protection: some laborcontracts are considered illegal (labor-only contracting); employees have to be employer

  • Level of minimum wages in 2007 (PPP US$)

    WDtth highest out of 130 (among top 50%)

    Source: ILO, March 2009

  • Levels of minimum wages relative to GDP per capita: developing &

    transition economies

    Source: ILO, March 2009

  • Wages and minimum wages (monthly levels in local currency, 2002/2004)

    Source: Saget (2008)

  • `MWs that seem far too high to be considered reasonable

    `Maxi MWs the MW is too high to be considered as a genuine MW Causes: MW negotiation tends to become a platform for actual wage negotiations, reinforced by system of exemptions

    D

  • Limited only to wage and salary workers in private establishments (which is about half of the employed) and family-operated activities

    Scope of Philippine minimum wages

    Employed Persons by Class of Workers (Share to total), 1991-2007

    Source: NSO Labor Force Surveys

    Around 75% worked for private establishments (roughly a third of

    the total employed); the rest worked for government

    Around 12% are employers

    Employed persons by class of workersshare to total, 1991-2007

    -

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    1991

    1992

    1993

    1994

    1995

    1996

    1997

    1998

    1999

    2000

    2001

    2002

    2003

    2004

    2005

    2006

    r20

    07

    in p

    erce

    nt

    Wage and Salary Workers Own-account workers Unpaid Family workers

  • Class of worker Poor Non-poor

    Wage and salary 39.8 50.9

    Self-employed 40.9 37.1

    Unpaid family worker 19.3 12.0

    Total 100.0 100.0

    Population in thousands 6,336 20,951

    Poverty and employment by class of worker (1998, in percent)

  • Exemptions and non-complianceWorkers in micro, cottage, and small Small and medium enterprises (SMEs) comprise 99.6% of all registered business in the Philippines and employ 70% of the workforce (NSCB, 2001)

    The analysis of geographic distribution of enterprises throughout the country indicates a high concentration in the National Capital Region (NCR), which accounts for 24.4% of all establishments and 40.1% of all employees.

    Part-time workers

    Scope of Philippine minimum wages

  • ^

    38% of non-agricultural workers receive wages lower than MW; 78% in agriculture

    Close to 50% in 15-24 age group earn below the MW By sector, proportions below MW areWholesale and retail trade 50%Manufacturing at least 30% Transport, communication and storage above 30%

    Community, social and personal services 27-32% NCR increased after 2005

  • Views on the minimum wage

    Dt in fact it has been set beyond that level; viewed as second to the most problematic among labor policies after restrictions on worker termination (Sicat, 2009). Firms without fiscal incentives, those with export orientation, domestically owned, of larger size, and younger tended to have stronger views against the current minimum wage policy.

  • Views on the minimum wage

    Organized labor: mixed views from abolition of RTWPBs to across-the-board wage legislation; MW policy has too many objectives, need to agree on what it is for: a wage bargaining)

    But if safety net, there should be no exemptions; however, level should be subject of negotiation.

  • Minimum wage effects

    Few studies in developing Asia (e.g. Indonesia); negligible in Philippines

    Aside from employment and income distribution effects, there are also effects on unions, CBAs, and inflation.

  • Effect of an increase in minimum wages: transition matrix

    Household heads and spouses (national)

    July 2006below

    minimum wage

    within minimum

    wage

    above minimum

    wageself employed unemployed not in the labor force Total

    below minimum wage 425 16 54 108 18 34 655within minimum wage 63 72 37 15 9 6 202above minimum wage 76 47 590 57 11 17 798Total 564 135 681 180 38 57 1,655

    January 2007

    Household heads and spouses (national), percent

    July 2006below

    minimum wage

    within minimum

    wage

    above minimum

    wage

    self employed unemployed

    not in the labor force Total

    below minimum wage 65% 2% 8% 16% 3% 5% 100%within minimum wage 31% 36% 18% 7% 4% 3% 100%above minimum wage 10% 6% 74% 7% 1% 2% 100%Total 34% 8% 41% 11% 2% 3% 100%

    January 2007

  • Effect of an increase in minimum wages: transition matrix

    Household heads and spouses (non-agriculture)

    July 2006below

    minimum wage

    within minimum

    wage

    above minimum

    wageself employed unemployed not in the labor force Total

    below minimum wage 222 14 41 45 11 18 351within minimum wage 59 66 36 11 8 6 186above minimum wage 59 45 564 48 10 17 743Total 340 125 641 104 29 41 1,280

    January 2007

    Household heads and spouses (non-agriculture), percent

    July 2006below

    minimum wage

    within minimum

    wage

    above minimum

    wage

    self employed unemployed

    not in the labor force Total

    below minimum wage 63% 4% 12% 13% 3% 5% 100%within minimum wage 32% 35% 19% 6% 4% 3% 100%above minimum wage 8% 6% 76% 6% 1% 2% 100%Total 27% 10% 50% 8% 2% 3% 100%

    January 2007

  • Effect of an increase in minimum wages: transition matrix

    Household heads and spouses (manufacturing)

    July 2006below

    minimum wage

    within minimum

    wage

    above minimum

    wageself employed unemployed not in the labor force Total

    below minimum wage 50 2 9 6 3 9 79within minimum wage 19 25 10 0 1 2 57above minimum wage 12 8 134 7 2 6 169Total 81 35 153 13 6 17 305

    January 2007

    Household heads and spouses (manufacturing), percent

    July 2006below

    minimum wage

    within minimum

    wage

    above minimum

    wage

    self employed unemployed

    not in the labor force Total

    below minimum wage 63% 3% 11% 8% 4% 11% 100%within minimum wage 33% 44% 18% 0% 2% 4% 100%above minimum wage 7% 5% 79% 4% 1% 4% 100%Total 27% 11% 50% 4% 2% 6% 100%

    January 2007

  • Effect of an increase in minimum wages: transition matrix

    Household heads and spouses (production/laborers)

    July 2006below

    minimum wage

    within minimum

    wage

    above minimum

    wageself employed unemployed not in the labor force Total

    below minimum wage 123 7 26 30 7 11 204within minimum wage 44 45 23 9 6 5 132above minimum wage 35 32 244 31 6 9 357Total 202 84 293 70 19 25 693

    January 2007

    Household heads and spouses (production/laborers), percent

    July 2006below

    minimum wage

    within minimum

    wage

    above minimum

    wage

    self employed unemployed

    not in the labor force Total

    below minimum wage 60% 3% 13% 15% 3% 5% 100%within minimum wage 33% 34% 17% 7% 5% 4% 100%above minimum wage 10% 9% 68% 9% 2% 3% 100%Total 29% 12% 42% 10% 3% 4% 100%

    January 2007

  • Thank You!

    21 July 2010