activation at work in belgium employment pathways out of social assistance sarah carpentier herman...
TRANSCRIPT
Activation at work in Belgium Employment pathways out of social assistance
Sarah CarpentierHerman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy Antwerp University
MIPI meeting Stockholm, 15-16 June 2010
2
1. Introduction 2. Activation in the Belgian social assistance scheme3. Data 4. Methodology 5. Hypotheses6. Preliminary results 7. Tentative conclusions8. Further Analysis
Outline
3
1. Introduction
Research questions • Which employment pathways can we discern in the exit
from social assistance to paid labour? - Regular labour market versus labour market
integration programmes • Who has which employment pathway
- Individual socio-economic characteristics- Labour market history - Duration in social assistance
• Which are the characteristics of the employment along different pathways- Full time/ part time employment - Full/partial independency from social assistance
4
1. IntroductionLiterature• Two strands of activation literature
- International comparative studies focussing on policy design(e.g. Lodemel & Trickey, 2000; Barbier & Ludwig-Meyerhofer, 2004; Serrano Pascual & Magnusson, 2007; Eichhorst & Konle-Seidl, 2008; Immervol, 2009)
- Assessment of specific active labour market programmes (e.g. Heckman et al. 1999; Martin & Grubb, 2001; Card et al., 1999)
• Literature on social assistance dynamics (e.g. Bane & Ellwood, 1986; Blank, 1989; Leisering & Leibfried, 2001; Saraceno, 2001; Capellari & Jenkins, 2008; Dahl & Lorentzen, 2003; Hansen, 2008)
5
1. Introduction
Approach• Combination of longitudinal perspective &
policy design approach by studying trajectories to multiple exit statesby survival analysis
(self) selection of beneficiaries in employment paths
6
1. Introduction
Belgium is an instructive case because of • High expenditure on active labour market
programmes • Very rich administrative data• Nation-specific in-depth analysis• Federal country
division of competences strongly impacts on social assistance
2. The Belgian social assistance scheme
8
2.1. Overall characteristics
• Last financial safety-net for able-bodied persons at working age
• In addition to - Other categorical social assistance schemes- Unemployment benefits unlimited in time - Flat-rate benefit for school leavers
• Family-based means-test• Shared competence of the federal state and
589 local welfare agencies• Indirect multilevel governance
9
2.2.Activation
2002 Social Integration Act• Aim: maximum societal integration, participation and
self-sufficiencymainly through employment
• Social assistance can be provided as - A cash benefit, in combination with a personal social
integration contract- A job in an labour market integration programme
• Working in an activation programme: =working according to labour lawgoes with loss of social advantages linked to beneficiary statute, except when entitled to supplementary benefit
10
2.2. Activation
• Availability for work, except when exempted• Instruments: incentives and services
- Generosity: rather low to international standards, especially for singles & couples with children
- Strict time limit for youngsters: 3 months - Personal integration contract
obligatory for youngstersoptional for those aged 25 and more
11
2.2. Activation
- Fixed rate socio-professional exemption in calculation of the benefit to stimulate to take up a (part time) job
- Inactivity and poverty gaps Full time: Substantial gains, but differentiated along household types (less attractive for couples with a single wage earner and lone parents)Part time: less attractive, especially for couples with a single wage earner
12
2.3. Active labour market policy
• High expenditure on active labour market policy • Focus on job creation
low expenditure for vocational training & stimuli for self-employment
13
2.3. Active labour market policy
Labour market integration programmes for social assistance beneficiaries • Direct job creation programme (Article 60)
- Specific programme for social assistance beneficiaries - Welfare agency is the employer- “User” is the welfare agency itself, an non-profit organisation
or an acknowledged social economy initiative- During the number of days the beneficiary lacks to be entitled
to full social rights - Total exemption of employer’s contribution - Federal subsidy (circa 900 €/month if full time)- Minimum part time (max. 6 months); mainly full time (or 4/5)- Permanent/fixed-term contract (with clause)
14
2.3. Active labour market policy
• Other labour market integration programmes for beneficiariescommon features- Accessible on the basis of proved former periods of inactivity
(for age groups)- Fixed-term exemption from employer’s contribution & federal
subsidy- Min. 1/3 or part time work - Contract: permanent/ fixed-term/ temporary3 types- Activa (all beneficiaries; all types of employers)- SINE (low-skilled; acknowledged employer in the social
economy)- Work experience (on-the-job training; regional design
component)
15
2.3. Active labour market policy
Distance from labour market Article 60SINE ACTIVAWork Experience
• Other subsidised employment programmes (no fixed-term)Service VouchersPermanent subsidised workers in local governments
16
2.4. Labour law
• High employment protection for insiders distinction between blue collar workers and employees
• 3 types of contracts - Permanent - Fixed term - For a specific task
17
3. Data
• 28590 persons aged 18-64= stock population June 2005,
not working and not entitled to other benefits • 1/3 proportionally stratified sample• Administrative data from Datawarehouse
Labour Market and Social Protection • Result of the trade-off between
information on the duration in social assistance and the number of events observed
Lexus chart for stock population June 2005
18
23
28
33
38
43
48
53
58
63
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
a
g
h ij
bc
k
ef
d
19
3. Data
• Individual characteristics of the sample (June 2005)- 53% of women- 27% under 24 years old, 24% between 25-34 years- 65% has another nationality at birth; in 2005 17% of
these persons has acquired the Belgian nationality- 30% one person household, 23% lone parents,
14% couple with children, 26% other - Work intensity since 1999
72% has not worked in Belgium
Duration in social assistance
17
12
10
1018
33 1-6 months
7-12 months
13-18 months
19-24 months
25-32 months
33 months or more
21
4. Methodology
Classification of employment pathways • Compromise between 4 considerations
- What is theoretically interesting • Wage earner versus self-employed• Normal contract (FT/PT) versus temporary contract• Active labour market policy vs. regular job circuit
- Linked to (social assistance) beneficiary status- Fixed-term versus no time limit
- Which employment paths involve different processes & actors
- Possible to distinguish in the data- Substantial number of transitions
22
4. Methodology
• Five exit states- Article 60- Fixed-term active labour market programmes- Other subsidised employment/ regular labour
market - Temporary or seasonal work - Self-employment
23
4. Methodology
• Survival analysis - Late entry design
modelling calendar time, duration as a covariate- Competing risks analysis of employment pathways
(not yet integrated) - Event: exit to first employment
(can be combined with supplementary benefit)- Discrete-time framework
Complementary log log link function
24
5. Hypotheses
• Transition to work - Households with children have a lower probability to exit than
lone persons (financial incentives)- Men have a higher probability to find a job - Non-linear relationship for age
• Employment paths (active labour market programmes design)- Higher work intensity, higher probability to be employed in
the regular labour market; followed by activation programmes, and finally the article 60 programme
- Longer duration in social assistance, lower probability to exit to regular labour market, higher probability to exit to article 60 and activation programmes
6. Preliminary results
26
Survivor function
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
0,9
1
26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Survivor function (all employment paths) for the June 2005 stock population
Survivor functions by employment pathway for the
June 2005 stock population
0,0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
0,9
1,0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Article 60 programme
Fixed-term activation programme
Self-employment
Temporary work
Subsidised/regular work
Temporary or seasonal work 10%
Regular labour market/ No fixed-term ALMP 14%
Article 609%
Fixed-term activation Programme3%
Social assistance beneficiaries (100% of the stock population) Self-employed
1%
Death0.6%
Pension (no supplementary social assistance benefit)0.3%
Flat-rate unemployment benefit (no supplementary SA benefit)
0.2%
Other Unknown0.2%
No exit 61%
Invalidity 0%
38%
Employment pathways at first moment of employment by December 2007
25
7
39
27
3 Article 60
ALMP forbeneficiaries
Other subsidisedemployment /regularjob circuit
Temporary orseasonal work
Self-employed
30
6. Preliminary Results
Controlling for other characteristics• Duration
- longer duration, lower probability of exit to article 60 and interim
- non-linear relationship of duration for activationprogrammes
- No significant effect on exit to regular LBM or self-employment
• Work intensity- higher work intensity, significant less probability to exit
to article 60- no significant effect of the work history on the
probability to exit to an activation programme- Higher work intensity, higher probability to exit to
interim/self-employment/regular or subsidised work
31
6. Preliminary Results
• Household type (ref=lone person)- Article 60: lone parent higher probability; couple with/without children
& other lower probability - Activation Programme: no significant effect- Self-employed: couples with children, higher exit probability- Interim: unknown householdtype, higher probability- Regular/subsidised: couples with children & other higher probability
• Agefor all employment paths: non-linear effect
• Sexno significant effect for Article 60 & Activation Programmeman: higher probability of exit to interim/regular work & self-employment
• Nationality at birthArt.60: non-EU lower probabilityInterim: non-EU higher probability
• Similar for type of legislation, also higher probability to exit to regular/subsidised work
Percentage entitled to supplementary benefit at first moment of work by exit state
Article 60 0
Activation programme for beneficiaries 12
Other subsidised employment/regular work 26
Self-employed 32
Temporary/seasonal work 33
Total 30
Percentage of working time at first moment of
employment by employment path
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Article 60 ALMP beneficiaries Temporary work Subsidisedemployment/regular
circuit
1-10% 11-30% 31-50% 51-70% 71-90% 91%-100% (and more)
34
7. Tentative conclusions
• Social assistance population has a substantial distance from the labour market
• Remarkable high percentage (30%) combines work with a supplementary social assistance benefit
• Studying all employment paths is instructive and crucial to understand a welfare-to-work scheme- Employment by active labour market programmes
accounts for only 1/3th of all exits to paid labour - High share of seasonal or temporary workers
35
7. Tentative conclusions
• Employment paths mediated by individual characteristics, in addition to work and social assistance history
• Employment paths are linked with characteristics of employment
• Conceptualising activationemployment paths useful! Labour law
36
8. Further research
• Refining the classification of employment pathways
• Survival analysis with multiple events in discrete time
• Studying the sustainability of employment for the different employment paths
38
Questions for discussion
• Classification of employment pathways • Conceptualisation of cumulated statutes
(duration in social assistance; transition to employment)
Pro
ba
bil
ity
of
em
plo
ym
en
t
Pro
ba
bil
ity
of
em
plo
ym
en
t (w
ith
ou
t S
A)
Art
60
Fix
ed
-tim
e A
LM
P
Se
lf-e
mp
loy
ed
Se
as
on
al/
Te
mp
ora
ry w
ork
Re
gu
lar
lab
ou
r m
ark
et/
oth
er
AL
MP
SexMan 43 68 23 7 4 36 33Women 32 72 30 7 2 16 44Unknown 99 35 10 2 1 55 32Age at quarter of entry18-24 50 70 17 4 2 30 4825-34 47 66 21 7 3 29 3635-44 39 72 35 10 3 22 3045-54 22 74 46 8 5 19 2755-64 6 69 32 8 13 18 31WI0% 31 70 26 7 3 26 381-10% 53 65 24 6 2 30 3811-25% 56 68 25 8 3 29 3726-50% 57 76 26 7 3 24 4151-75% 56 81 20 6 6 23 4576-100% 49 83 35 9 14 11 32