achieving high reliability of complex advanced energy ...mr. abrams is a renowned expert in the...
TRANSCRIPT
Engineering Solutions for Success
PRESENTED BY:PRESENTED BY:SCOTT B. ABRAMS, P.E.SCOTT B. ABRAMS, P.E.
NOVEMBER 19, 2009NOVEMBER 19, 2009
ACHIEVING HIGH RELIABILITY OF ACHIEVING HIGH RELIABILITY OF COMPLEX ADVANCED ENERGY SYSTEMSCOMPLEX ADVANCED ENERGY SYSTEMS
Engineering Solutions for Success
WHO WE ARE
• AWARD-WINNING ENGINEERING COMPANY
• ESTABLISHED 1984
• GLOBAL PRESENCE
• 96% REPEAT CUSTOMER BASE
RECOGNIZED INDUSTRY LEADERRECOGNIZED INDUSTRY LEADER
Engineering Solutions for Success
WHAT WE DO
• ENSURE THE RELIABILITY AND SAFETY OF NEW AND EMERGING SYSTEMS AND PRODUCTS– SAFETY-CRITICAL– REVENUE-CRITICAL– MISSION-CRITICAL
• RELIABILITY AND SAFETY IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVES ON EXISTING LEGACY SYSTEMS AND PRODUCTS
• PROVIDE SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT
• DEVELOP TURN-KEY TEST EQUIPMENT
WORK WITH DEVELOPMENT TEAMWORK WITH DEVELOPMENT TEAM
Engineering Solutions for Success
WHY COMPANIES DEPEND ONTHE OMNICON GROUP
ENHANCERESOURCES
SCHEDULERECOVERY
REDUCEOPERATING
COSTS
FOCUS ONCORE
BUSINESS
ACCESSTO WORLD
CLASSTALENT
INCREASEPROFIT
REDUCEPROGRAM
RISK
OMNICONADVANTAGE
Engineering Solutions for Success
• AWARD-WINNING COMPANY WITH AWARD WINNING ENGINEERS– HIGHEST NUMBER OF ENGINEERS NAMED
“RELIABILITY ENGINEER OF THE YEAR” BY THE IEEE– YEAR-AFTER-YEAR BUSINESS ACHIEVEMENTS– NUMEROUS TESTIMONIALS AND COMMENDATIONS
• EXTREMELY LOYAL CUSTOMER BASE– RELATIONSHIPS CONTINUING FOR OVER 25 YEARS– LONG TRACK RECORD SATISFYING
CUSTOMERS WITH A UNIQUE BLEND OF EXPERTISE,IMAGINATION ANDCUSTOMER-ORIENTEDSERVICE
WHAT SETS US APART FROM OTHER ORGANIZATIONS?
Engineering Solutions for Success
WHAT IS A RELIABLE SYSTEM?
• PERFORMS ITS INTENDED FUNCTION FOR THE REQUIRED DURATION WITHIN A GIVEN ENVIRONMENT (HIGH OPERATIONAL AVAILABILITY)
• ADDITIONAL BENEFITS– SYSTEM OPTIMIZED FOR RELIABILITY VERSUS
PERFORMANCE, COST & NET REVENUE– LOWERS OPERATING COSTS– ACHIEVES CUSTOMER
EXPECTATIONS
Engineering Solutions for Success
BATHTUB CURVE
Engineering Solutions for Success
OPTION 1 SCALEABLE SOLAR ARRAY FIELD
TRANSFORMER
12.4KV OUTPUT
TRANSFORMER
12.4KV OUTPUT
12.4KV, 3PHCOLLECTION
LINES(4.0 MW)
TRACKERS/CONCENTRATORS
MONITORS ANDCONTROL
COMBINERBOXES DISCONNECTS
2,496 SOLARPANELS
(104 STRINGSOF 24 PANELS)
480V 3PH,500KW
INVERTER
2,496 SOLARPANELS
(104 STRINGSOF 24 PANELS)
480V 3PH,500KW
INVERTER
2,496 SOLARPANELS
(104 STRINGSOF 24 PANELS)
480V 3PH,500KW
INVERTER
2,496 SOLARPANELS
(104 STRINGSOF 24 PANELS)
480V 3PH,500KW
INVERTER
2,496 SOLARPANELS
(104 STRINGSOF 24 PANELS)
480V 3PH,500KW
INVERTER
2,496 SOLARPANELS
(104 STRINGSOF 24 PANELS)
480V 3PH,500KW
INVERTER
2,496 SOLARPANELS
(104 STRINGSOF 24 PANELS)
480V 3PH,500KW
INVERTER
2,496 SOLARPANELS
(104 STRINGSOF 24 PANELS)
480V 3PH,500KW
INVERTER
TRACKERS/CONCENTRATORS
TRANSFORMER
12.4KV OUTPUT
TRANSFORMER
12.4KV OUTPUT
Engineering Solutions for Success
OPTION 2 SCALEABLESOLAR ARRAY FIELD
TRANSFORMER
12.4KV OUTPUT
TRANSFORMER
12.4KV OUTPUT
12.4KV, 3PHCOLLECTION
LINES(4.0 MW)
TRACKERS/CONCENTRATORS
MONITORS ANDCONTROL
TRACKERS/CONCENTRATORS
4,992 SOLARPANELS
(208 STRINGSOF 24 PANELS)
480V 3PH,1.0MW
INVERTER
DISCONNECTSCOMBINER
BOXES
4,992 SOLARPANELS
(208 STRINGSOF 24 PANELS)
480V 3PH,1.0MW
INVERTER
4,992 SOLARPANELS
(208 STRINGSOF 24 PANELS)
480V 3PH,1.0MW
INVERTER
4,992 SOLARPANELS
(208 STRINGSOF 24 PANELS)
480V 3PH,1.0MW
INVERTER
Engineering Solutions for Success
RELIABILITY COMPARISON QUESTIONS
• HOW DOES DECREASE IN EQUIPMENT QUANTITY, AFFORDED BY INCREASE IN EQUIPMENT POWER, EFFECT RELIABILITY (MTBF, MTBCF, MTBMA)?– HOW DOES 1MW INVERTER COMPARE TO 500KW
INVERTER?– HOW DOES 2MW TRANSFORMER COMPARE TO 1MW
TRANSFORMER?
• HOW DOES DIFFERENT SYSTEM ARCHITECTURES EFFECT INTERCONNECT RELIABILITY AND GRACEFUL DEGRADATION?
• WHAT IS TIME & COST TO CORRECT FAILED EQUIPMENT (SPARES AVAILABILITY, MTTR, LOGISTICS DELAY TIME, LOST REVENUE)?
Engineering Solutions for Success
BENEFIT OF REDUNDANCY
Reliability of One Unit
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Time (months)
R(t
) & P
erce
nt Im
prov
emen
t
Single Unit
1 of 2 Units Rqd
Improvement
Engineering Solutions for Success
BENEFIT OF REDUNDANCY WITH GRACEFUL DEGRADATION
Reliability of Four Units
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Time (months)
R(t
) & P
erce
nt Im
prov
emen
t
4 Units
4 of 5 Units Rqd
Improvement
100% Improvement
after 40 Months of Operation
Reliability near 100% if failed unit repaired
before next unit fails
Engineering Solutions for Success
ACHIEVING A COST EFFECTIVERELIABLE SYSTEM (1 OF 3)
• KNOW THE DESIGN & ENVIRONMENT REQUIREMENTS• DEVELOP SYSTEM & EQUIPMENT SUCCESS CRITERIA’S• FLOW DOWN REQUIREMENTS • DEVELOP RELIABILITY MODELS• PERFORM/SUPPORT TRADE-OFF STUDIES• IDENTIFY CRITICAL ITEMS• DERATE EQUIPMENT & COMPONENTS• IDENTIFY LIMITED LIFE ITEMS• NEGOTIATE WITH EQUIPMENT SUPPLIERS
– WARRANTY – MANUFACTURER RESPONSE TIME– UP-TIME GUARANTEE
• PARTICIPATE IN FORMAL DESIGN REVIEWS• ACCOMPLISH WORST CASE ANALYSES
Engineering Solutions for Success
ACHIEVING A COST EFFECTIVERELIABLE SYSTEM (2 OF 3)
• PREDICT EQUIPMENT & SYSTEM RELIABILITY• APPLY PHYSICS OF FAILURE• KNOW YOUR DISSIMILAR METALS• UNDERSTAND PROPERTIES OF MATERIALS• PERFORM FAILURE MODE AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS• IDENTIFY SINGLE POINT FAILURES• DOCUMENT COMPENSATING PROVISIONS• DEVELOP FAULT/SUCCESS TREES• ASSESS DIAGNOSTICS CAPABILITIES• DEVELOP TROUBLESHOOTING TREES• ASSESS FEASIBILITY & BENEFITS OF PROGNOSTICS• DETERMINE IF COMMON CAUSE FAILURES EXIST• ASSESS EFFECTS OF SHIPPING & INSTALLATION• DETERMINE OPTIMUM ON-SITE SPARES
Engineering Solutions for Success
ACHIEVING A COST EFFECTIVERELIABLE SYSTEM (3 OF 3)
• PERFORM RELIABILITY TESTING• PERFORM MAINTAINABILITY ANALYSIS • OPTIMIZE MAINTENANCE CONCEPT• DEVELOP SUPPORTABILITY PLAN• CONSIDER HUMAN FACTORS EFFECT ON RELIABILITY• IDENTIFY, ELIMINATE & DOCUMENT SAFETY HAZARDS• DEVELOP PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ACTIONS• MAINTAIN LIST OF SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE TASKS• MAINTAIN LIST OF DEFERRED MAINTENANCE ITEMS• DEVELOP CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES• PERFORM FAILURE ANALYSIS• MAINTAIN FAILURE REPORTING & CORRECTIVE ACTION
SYSTEM• SHARE LESSONS LEARNED WITH KEY SUPPLIERS
Engineering Solutions for Success
CONCLUSION
• APPLICATION OF RELIABILITY PRINCIPLES & PRACTICES TO ADVANCED ENERGY SYSTEMS– HELPS CONTROL PROJECT RISK– MINIMIZES COSTLY BAND-AIDS– INCREASES LIFE OF INVESTMENT– INCREASES POWER OUTPUT– MINIMIZES LIFE CYCLE COSTS– INCREASES NET PROFITS– INCREASES LENDER & CUSTOMER
SATISFACTION
WILL PAY FOR ITSELF!WILL PAY FOR ITSELF!
Engineering Solutions for Success
CONTACT INFORMATION
SCOTT B. ABRAMS, [email protected] X304
THE OMNICON GROUP INC40 ARKAY DRHAUPPAUGE, NY 11788WWW.OMNICONGROUP.COM
Scott B. Abrams is President and CEO of The Omnicon Group, an award-winning engineering company recognized for ensuring the reliability of new and emerging systems and products. Since 1984, Mr. Abrams and The Omnicon Group have worked with technology companies throughout the world to analyze and improve the reliability and safety of their products, to develop robust systems and software, and to provide comprehensive test engineering services.
Mr. Abrams is a renowned expert in the reliability field and was dubbed “Mr. Reliability” by the Long Island Business News and “The Gizmo Doctor” by the New York Times. His most proud citation is the “Reliability Engineer of the Year” award he received from his peers at the IEEE Reliability Society.
Mr. Abrams received his B.E. in Electrical Engineering from Stony Brook University and a M.S. in Electrical Engineering from Polytechnic University. He is a licensed Professional Engineer in New York State.