acheson / bode food safety law 01-06-11
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Food Safety Modernization Act:
Implications of New Legislation
David W K Acheson M.D.Leavitt Partners LLC
John W. BodeOFW Law
Increased inspection frequency Expanded records access Import certification authority Mandatory recall authority Fees Port shopping Whistleblower protection
What is new? ◦ FDA must target inspection resources based on risk
Known safety risk of the food Compliance history of a firm Rigor and effectiveness of the facility’s hazard analysis
and risk-based preventive controls
◦ Mandatory inspection frequencies for: Domestic high-risk facilities Domestic low-risk facilities Foreign facilities
5
Who is impacted? ◦ All registered facilities (any factory, warehouse, or
establishment that manufactures, processes, packs or holds food)
◦ Some facilities that are small or very small businesses engaged in specific types of on-farm manufacturing, processing, packing or holding that are determined to be low-risk may be exempt from inspection frequency requirements (dependent on regulations to be issued by FDA)
6
What will be different?◦ FDA will not be able to meet requirements with
current resources◦ Utilize Federal, State, and Local regulatory partners
(domestic facilities)◦ Utilize third party certification (foreign facilities)◦ Agreements with foreign governments ◦ Deny import of food from firms refusing inspection
What does this mean?◦ Greater regulatory presence◦ Increased oversight of and focus on imported food
7
What is new? ◦ If FDA has a reasonable belief an article of food
will cause severe adverse health consequences must provide FDA access to all records -- Relating to that article of food Relating to any other article of food that may
have been impacted in a similar manner
Who is impacted? ◦ Anyone who manufactures, processes, packs,
distributes, receives, holds or imports food ◦ Farms and restaurants are excluded
8
What will be different? ◦ Previously, FDA only had access to records
relating to the specific article of food reasonably believed to present a threat of serious health consequences
What does this mean? ◦ “Lower bar” for FDA to access records
9
What is new? ◦ Gives FDA authority to require a mandatory recall
of product if responsible party refuses to voluntarily recall
◦ If FDA orders mandatory recall, informal hearing with the responsible party due within 2 days
◦ Failure to comply subject to civil penalties and criminal prosecution
◦ Incident Command Operation for each recall to coordinate government activities
10
Who is impacted? ◦ Registered facilities that manufacture, process,
pack, or hold food◦ Farms, restaurants, and retail food establishments
that are exempt from registering under Section 415 of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act will not be directly impacted, but may be involved in recalls
What will be different? Previously, if a firm refused to recall, FDA could issue press and seek court order for injunction and/or seizure of productGives FDA authority to take action without prior court approval
11
What does this mean? ◦ Majority of recalls occur voluntarily and quickly
because firms to not want to risk making consumers sick
◦ Mandatory recalls rare◦ Improved government coordination in recalls
12
What is new? ◦ FDA may require imported food to be certified by
accredited third-party auditor (which may be a foreign government) to ensure compliance with U.S. laws
◦ Certificates can apply to a specific shipment of food or to a facility
◦ Requirement for certification is based on: Known safety risks associated with the food Know safety risk of the country, territory, or region of
origin Strength of the food safety system in the country,
territory, or region of origin
13
Who is impacted? ◦ Foreign manufacturers, processors, packers, holders, and
importers◦ Food safety auditors
What will be different? ◦ Entry of product into the U.S. may be delayed until
certification is obtained
What does this mean? ◦ Gives FDA additional leverage ◦ How FDA defines risk will be important◦ Will likely take time to gain full effect, but may impact
selected foods immediately
14
Other Provisions—◦ Fees◦ Port shopping◦ Whistleblower protection
Facility registration Preventive controls Protection against intentional adulteration Performance standards Standards for fresh produce Accreditation of third party auditors Accreditation of laboratories Traceability Foreign supplier verification program Administrative detention of food Prior notice of imported food
Biennial registration of all food facilitiesBetween Oct. and Dec. of even numbered yearsSooner of 180 days or FDA issuance of regulationElectronic submission may be required after 5 years
Suspension of registrationFDA Commissioner finds food presents a reasonable probability of causing serious adverse health consequencesRegistrant entitled to administrative hearingSooner of interim final regulations or 180 days after enactment
Registered Facilities Plans and all related records available to FDA
during inspection Exemption
◦ Comparable plans already required◦ Others
Plans available to FDA at inspection FDA issue regulation within 18 months
19191919
Hazard analysisHazard analysis Preventive controlsPreventive controls ValidationValidation MonitoringMonitoring Verification Verification RecordkeepingRecordkeeping Corrective ActionsCorrective Actions Performance StandardsPerformance Standards
Sanitation proceduresSanitation procedures Recall planRecall plan Food allergen control Food allergen control
programprogram Supplier verification Supplier verification
activitiesactivities Environmental Environmental
samplingsampling TestingTesting
Every 2 years, FDA to review and evaluate relevant health data
Determine most significant foodborne contaminants
Issue contaminant-specific performance standards, which may include action levels
FDA to establish standards for safe production and harvesting For produce FDA has determined such standards minimize the risk of serious adverse health consequencesProposed rule for minimum standards within 1 yearPublish updated Good Agricultural Practices within 1 year
◦ FDA to issue regulations to protect against intentional adulteration
For foods at high risk of intentional adulteration
Regulation issued within 18 months◦ FDA to issue guidance on protection against
intentional adulteration, including model vulnerability assessment and examples of mitigation strategies and
measures Guidance issued within 1 year
FDA to establish a system to recognize accreditation bodies
Accreditation of 3rd party auditors Unannounced audits to certify “foreign
entities” or their food in compliance with FDA requirements
Auditors required to report to FDA serious deficiencies
Auditors’ accreditation subject to summary revocation if food linked to outbreak
Fees to cover cost of program
FDA must establish a program for the testing of food by accredited labs within 2 yearsFood testing for regulatory purposes must be conducted by accredited labs within 30 monthsRequires test results sent directly to FDA within 30 months
Role of epidemiological investigationsFDA to establish a product tracing system to receive information that allows FDA to effectively and rapidly track and trace food for consumption in USFDA conduct pilots of produce and processed food sectors within 180 daysNo specific timeline provided for establishing a product tracing system
Additional recordkeeping requirements for high-risk food
FDA to establish a list of high-risk foods within 1 yearFDA to issue a NRPM on expanded record-keeping requirements for high-risk food
Subject to expanded FDA records accessDuring foodborne disease outbreak or investigation orReasonable belief food presents threat of serious adverse health consequences (or food affected in a similar manner)
Starting 18 months after enactment, FDA may require responsible party to submit “consumer-oriented information”
FDA will then post 1-page summary of information on its website, and “grocery stores” with 15 or more locations will be required to display within 24 hours
FDA to publish list of means of display, which will include giving “target recall information” to the consumer upon purchase of a food
Risk based foreign supplier verification activities required of importers –◦ Preventive controls◦ Produce standards◦ Not adulterated or misbranded regarding allergens
Effective in 2 years Offering food for import without compliant
verification program subject to injunction and criminal prosecution
Voluntary Qualified Importer Program
FDA may detain food when “reason to believe” threat of serious adverse health consequencesPrevious standard was “credible evidence”Lower standard generally aligned with state detention authority FDA to issue an interim final rule within 180 days
Prior Notice requirement expanded to include “any country to which the article of food has been refused entry.”
Effective in 180 days
David Acheson, MD◦ Leavitt Partners◦ [email protected]◦ 801-910-5795◦ www.leavittpartners.com
John Bode◦ OFW Law◦ [email protected]◦ 202-518-6323◦ www.ofwlaw.com