AccessibilityProposed Code Modifications

Glitch Modifications

This document created by the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation -

850-487-1824

Page 1 of 32

27/06/2013 Page 1 of 32

TAC: AccessibilityTotal Mods for Accessibility in Approved as Submitted: 14

Total Mods for report: 14

Accessibility2013 Glitch

Page 2 of 32

27/06/2013 Page 2 of 32

Sub Code: Building

Attachments

T Stafford

No

4/27/2013

Approved as Submitted

202

Pending Review

No

Proponent

Affects HVHZ

Date Submitted

TAC Recommendation

Section

Commission Action

A6191

2Chapter

Related Modifications

Summary of Modification

Corrects a conflict within the updated code. Type A and Type B Dwelling units are not used by the Florida Accessibility Code.

Rationale

Corrects a conflict within the updated code. The terms Type A and Type B Dwelling Units are not used by the Florida Accessibility

Code.

Fiscal Impact Statement

Impact to local entity relative to enforcement of code

No impact to local entities.

Impact to building and property owners relative to cost of compliance with code

No impact to building and property owners.

Impact to industry relative to the cost of compliance with code

No impact to industry.

Requirements

Has a reasonable and substantial connection with the health, safety, and welfare of the general public

Corrects a conflict within the updated code.

Strengthens or improves the code, and provides equivalent or better products, methods, or systems of construction

Corrects a conflict within the updated code.

Does not discriminate against materials, products, methods, or systems of construction of demonstrated capabilities

Corrects a conflict within the updated code.

Does not degrade the effectiveness of the code

Corrects a conflict within the updated code.

Is the proposed code modification part of a prior code version?

YES

The provisions contained in the proposed amendment are addressed in the applicable international code?

NO

The amendment demonstrates by evidence or data that the geographical jurisdiction of Florida exihibits a need to strengthen

the foundation code beyond the needs or regional variation addressed by the foundation code and why the proposed

amendment applies to the state?

YES

The proposed amendment was submitted or attempted to be included in the foundation codes to avoid resubmission to the

Florida Building Code amendment process?

NO

(a.) Conflicts within the updated code;X

(b.) Conflicts between the updated code and the Florida Fire Prevention Code adopted pursuant to chapter

633;

(c.) Unintended results from the integration of previously adopted Florida-specific amendments with the

model code;

(d.) Equivalency of standards;

(e.) Changes to or inconsistencies with federal or state law;

(f.) Adoption of an updated edition of the National Electrical Code if the commission finds that delay of

implementing the updated edition causes undue hardship to stakeholders or otherwise threatens the public

health, safety, and welfare.

Accessibility2013 Glitch

Page 3 of 32

27/06/2013 Page 3 of 32

Pa

ge

: 1

http://w

ww

.flo

ridabuild

ing.o

rg/U

plo

ad/M

odifi

catio

ns/

Rendere

d/M

od_6191_T

ext

OfM

odifi

catio

n_1.p

ng

A6191 T

ex

t M

od

ific

ati

on

Accessibility2013 Glitch

Page 4 of 32

27/06/2013 Page 4 of 32

Attachments

T Stafford

No

4/27/2013

Approved as Submitted

403.4.8

Pending Review

No

Proponent

Affects HVHZ

Date Submitted

TAC Recommendation

Section

Commission Action

A6193

4Chapter

Related Modifications

Summary of Modification

Corrects a conflict within the updated code. Corrects section references.

Rationale

Corrects a conflict within the updated code. Corrects section references. Section 1007 has been deleted and references the Florida

Accessibility Code.

Fiscal Impact Statement

Impact to local entity relative to enforcement of code

No impact to local entities.

Impact to building and property owners relative to cost of compliance with code

No impact to building and property owners.

Impact to industry relative to the cost of compliance with code

No impact to industry.

Requirements

Has a reasonable and substantial connection with the health, safety, and welfare of the general public

Corrects a conflict within the updated code.

Strengthens or improves the code, and provides equivalent or better products, methods, or systems of construction

Corrects a conflict within the updated code.

Does not discriminate against materials, products, methods, or systems of construction of demonstrated capabilities

Corrects a conflict within the updated code.

Does not degrade the effectiveness of the code

Corrects a conflict within the updated code.

Is the proposed code modification part of a prior code version?

YES

The provisions contained in the proposed amendment are addressed in the applicable international code?

NO

The amendment demonstrates by evidence or data that the geographical jurisdiction of Florida exihibits a need to strengthen

the foundation code beyond the needs or regional variation addressed by the foundation code and why the proposed

amendment applies to the state?

OTHER

Explanation of Choice

Corrects and incorrect section reference.

The proposed amendment was submitted or attempted to be included in the foundation codes to avoid resubmission to the

Florida Building Code amendment process?

NO

(a.) Conflicts within the updated code;X

(b.) Conflicts between the updated code and the Florida Fire Prevention Code adopted pursuant to chapter

633;

(c.) Unintended results from the integration of previously adopted Florida-specific amendments with the

model code;

(d.) Equivalency of standards;

(e.) Changes to or inconsistencies with federal or state law;

(f.) Adoption of an updated edition of the National Electrical Code if the commission finds that delay of

implementing the updated edition causes undue hardship to stakeholders or otherwise threatens the public

health, safety, and welfare.

Accessibility2013 Glitch

Page 5 of 32

27/06/2013 Page 5 of 32

Pa

ge

: 1

http://w

ww

.flo

ridabuild

ing.o

rg/U

plo

ad/M

odifi

catio

ns/

Rendere

d/M

od_6193_T

ext

OfM

odifi

catio

n_1.p

ng

A6193 T

ex

t M

od

ific

ati

on

Accessibility2013 Glitch

Page 6 of 32

27/06/2013 Page 6 of 32

Attachments

T Stafford

No

4/27/2013

Approved as Submitted

406.4.1

Pending Review

No

Proponent

Affects HVHZ

Date Submitted

TAC Recommendation

Section

Commission Action

A6194

4Chapter

Related Modifications

Summary of Modification

Corrects a conflict within the updated code. Corrects section references.

Rationale

Corrects a conflict within the updated code. Corrects section references. Chapter 11 has been deleted and references the Florida

Accessibility Code.

Fiscal Impact Statement

Impact to local entity relative to enforcement of code

No impact to local entities.

Impact to building and property owners relative to cost of compliance with code

No impact to building and property owners.

Impact to industry relative to the cost of compliance with code

No impact to industry.

Requirements

Has a reasonable and substantial connection with the health, safety, and welfare of the general public

Corrects a conflict within the updated code.

Strengthens or improves the code, and provides equivalent or better products, methods, or systems of construction

Corrects a conflict within the updated code.

Does not discriminate against materials, products, methods, or systems of construction of demonstrated capabilities

Corrects a conflict within the updated code.

Does not degrade the effectiveness of the code

Corrects a conflict within the updated code.

Is the proposed code modification part of a prior code version?

YES

The provisions contained in the proposed amendment are addressed in the applicable international code?

NO

The amendment demonstrates by evidence or data that the geographical jurisdiction of Florida exihibits a need to strengthen

the foundation code beyond the needs or regional variation addressed by the foundation code and why the proposed

amendment applies to the state?

OTHER

Explanation of Choice

Corrects and incorrect section reference.

The proposed amendment was submitted or attempted to be included in the foundation codes to avoid resubmission to the

Florida Building Code amendment process?

NO

(a.) Conflicts within the updated code;X

(b.) Conflicts between the updated code and the Florida Fire Prevention Code adopted pursuant to chapter

633;

(c.) Unintended results from the integration of previously adopted Florida-specific amendments with the

model code;

(d.) Equivalency of standards;

(e.) Changes to or inconsistencies with federal or state law;

(f.) Adoption of an updated edition of the National Electrical Code if the commission finds that delay of

implementing the updated edition causes undue hardship to stakeholders or otherwise threatens the public

health, safety, and welfare.

Accessibility2013 Glitch

Page 7 of 32

27/06/2013 Page 7 of 32

Pa

ge

: 1

http://w

ww

.flo

ridabuild

ing.o

rg/U

plo

ad/M

odifi

catio

ns/

Rendere

d/M

od_6194_T

ext

OfM

odifi

catio

n_1.p

ng

A6194 T

ex

t M

od

ific

ati

on

Accessibility2013 Glitch

Page 8 of 32

27/06/2013 Page 8 of 32

Attachments

T Stafford

No

4/27/2013

Approved as Submitted

419.9

Pending Review

No

Proponent

Affects HVHZ

Date Submitted

TAC Recommendation

Section

Commission Action

A6195

4Chapter

Related Modifications

Summary of Modification

Corrects a conflict within the updated code. Corrects section references.

Rationale

Corrects a conflict within the updated code. Corrects section references. Chapter 11 has been deleted and references the Florida

Accessibility Code.

Fiscal Impact Statement

Impact to local entity relative to enforcement of code

No impact to local entities.

Impact to building and property owners relative to cost of compliance with code

No impact to building and property owners.

Impact to industry relative to the cost of compliance with code

No impact to industry.

Requirements

Has a reasonable and substantial connection with the health, safety, and welfare of the general public

Corrects a conflict within the updated code.

Strengthens or improves the code, and provides equivalent or better products, methods, or systems of construction

Corrects a conflict within the updated code.

Does not discriminate against materials, products, methods, or systems of construction of demonstrated capabilities

Corrects a conflict within the updated code.

Does not degrade the effectiveness of the code

Corrects a conflict within the updated code.

Is the proposed code modification part of a prior code version?

YES

The provisions contained in the proposed amendment are addressed in the applicable international code?

NO

The amendment demonstrates by evidence or data that the geographical jurisdiction of Florida exihibits a need to strengthen

the foundation code beyond the needs or regional variation addressed by the foundation code and why the proposed

amendment applies to the state?

OTHER

Explanation of Choice

Correct and incorrect section reference.

The proposed amendment was submitted or attempted to be included in the foundation codes to avoid resubmission to the

Florida Building Code amendment process?

NO

(a.) Conflicts within the updated code;X

(b.) Conflicts between the updated code and the Florida Fire Prevention Code adopted pursuant to chapter

633;

(c.) Unintended results from the integration of previously adopted Florida-specific amendments with the

model code;

(d.) Equivalency of standards;

(e.) Changes to or inconsistencies with federal or state law;

(f.) Adoption of an updated edition of the National Electrical Code if the commission finds that delay of

implementing the updated edition causes undue hardship to stakeholders or otherwise threatens the public

health, safety, and welfare.

Accessibility2013 Glitch

Page 9 of 32

27/06/2013 Page 9 of 32

Pa

ge

: 1

http://w

ww

.flo

ridabuild

ing.o

rg/U

plo

ad/M

odifi

catio

ns/

Rendere

d/M

od_6195_T

ext

OfM

odifi

catio

n_1.p

ng

A6195 T

ex

t M

od

ific

ati

on

Accessibility2013 Glitch

Page 10 of 32

27/06/2013 Page 10 of 32

Attachments

T Stafford

No

4/27/2013

Approved as Submitted

709.4

Pending Review

No

Proponent

Affects HVHZ

Date Submitted

TAC Recommendation

Section

Commission Action

A6197

7Chapter

Related Modifications

Summary of Modification

Corrects a conflict within the updated code.

Rationale

Conflict with updated code. The provisions of Section 1007 have been deleted and references the Florida Accessibility Code.

Fiscal Impact Statement

Impact to local entity relative to enforcement of code

No impact to local entities.

Impact to building and property owners relative to cost of compliance with code

No impact to building and property owners.

Impact to industry relative to the cost of compliance with code

No impact to industry.

Requirements

Has a reasonable and substantial connection with the health, safety, and welfare of the general public

Corrects a conflict within the updated code.

Strengthens or improves the code, and provides equivalent or better products, methods, or systems of construction

Corrects a conflict within the updated code.

Does not discriminate against materials, products, methods, or systems of construction of demonstrated capabilities

Corrects a conflict within the updated code.

Does not degrade the effectiveness of the code

Corrects a conflict within the updated code.

Is the proposed code modification part of a prior code version?

YES

The provisions contained in the proposed amendment are addressed in the applicable international code?

NO

The amendment demonstrates by evidence or data that the geographical jurisdiction of Florida exihibits a need to strengthen

the foundation code beyond the needs or regional variation addressed by the foundation code and why the proposed

amendment applies to the state?

OTHER

Explanation of Choice

corrects incorrect section reference.

The proposed amendment was submitted or attempted to be included in the foundation codes to avoid resubmission to the

Florida Building Code amendment process?

NO

(a.) Conflicts within the updated code;X

(b.) Conflicts between the updated code and the Florida Fire Prevention Code adopted pursuant to chapter

633;

(c.) Unintended results from the integration of previously adopted Florida-specific amendments with the

model code;

(d.) Equivalency of standards;

(e.) Changes to or inconsistencies with federal or state law;

(f.) Adoption of an updated edition of the National Electrical Code if the commission finds that delay of

implementing the updated edition causes undue hardship to stakeholders or otherwise threatens the public

health, safety, and welfare.

Accessibility2013 Glitch

Page 11 of 32

27/06/2013 Page 11 of 32

Pa

ge

: 1

http://w

ww

.flo

ridabuild

ing.o

rg/U

plo

ad/M

odifi

catio

ns/

Rendere

d/M

od_6197_T

ext

OfM

odifi

catio

n_1.p

ng

A6197 T

ex

t M

od

ific

ati

on

Accessibility2013 Glitch

Page 12 of 32

27/06/2013 Page 12 of 32

Attachments

T Stafford

No

4/27/2013

Approved as Submitted

907.5.2.2.4

Pending Review

No

Proponent

Affects HVHZ

Date Submitted

TAC Recommendation

Section

Commission Action

A6198

9Chapter

Related Modifications

Summary of Modification

Corrects a conflict within the updated code.

Rationale

Conflict with updated code. The provisions of Chapter 11 have been deleted and references the Florida Accessibility Code.

Fiscal Impact Statement

Impact to local entity relative to enforcement of code

No impact to local entities.

Impact to building and property owners relative to cost of compliance with code

No impact to building and property owners.

Impact to industry relative to the cost of compliance with code

No impact to industry.

Requirements

Has a reasonable and substantial connection with the health, safety, and welfare of the general public

Corrects a conflict within the updated code.

Strengthens or improves the code, and provides equivalent or better products, methods, or systems of construction

Corrects a conflict within the updated code.

Does not discriminate against materials, products, methods, or systems of construction of demonstrated capabilities

Corrects a conflict within the updated code.

Does not degrade the effectiveness of the code

Corrects a conflict within the updated code.

Is the proposed code modification part of a prior code version?

YES

The provisions contained in the proposed amendment are addressed in the applicable international code?

NO

The amendment demonstrates by evidence or data that the geographical jurisdiction of Florida exihibits a need to strengthen

the foundation code beyond the needs or regional variation addressed by the foundation code and why the proposed

amendment applies to the state?

OTHER

Explanation of Choice

Corrects and incorrect section reference.

The proposed amendment was submitted or attempted to be included in the foundation codes to avoid resubmission to the

Florida Building Code amendment process?

NO

(a.) Conflicts within the updated code;X

(b.) Conflicts between the updated code and the Florida Fire Prevention Code adopted pursuant to chapter

633;

(c.) Unintended results from the integration of previously adopted Florida-specific amendments with the

model code;

(d.) Equivalency of standards;

(e.) Changes to or inconsistencies with federal or state law;

(f.) Adoption of an updated edition of the National Electrical Code if the commission finds that delay of

implementing the updated edition causes undue hardship to stakeholders or otherwise threatens the public

health, safety, and welfare.

Accessibility2013 Glitch

Page 13 of 32

27/06/2013 Page 13 of 32

Pa

ge

: 1

http://w

ww

.flo

ridabuild

ing.o

rg/U

plo

ad/M

odifi

catio

ns/

Rendere

d/M

od_6198_T

ext

OfM

odifi

catio

n_1.p

ng

A6198 T

ex

t M

od

ific

ati

on

Accessibility2013 Glitch

Page 14 of 32

27/06/2013 Page 14 of 32

Attachments

T Stafford

No

4/27/2013

Approved as Submitted

1003.7

Pending Review

No

Proponent

Affects HVHZ

Date Submitted

TAC Recommendation

Section

Commission Action

A6200

10Chapter

Related Modifications

Summary of Modification

Corrects a conflict within the updated code.

Rationale

Conflict with updated code. the provisions of section 1007 have been deleted and reference the Florida Accessibility Code.

Fiscal Impact Statement

Impact to local entity relative to enforcement of code

No impact to local entities.

Impact to building and property owners relative to cost of compliance with code

No impact to building and property owners.

Impact to industry relative to the cost of compliance with code

No impact to industry.

Requirements

Has a reasonable and substantial connection with the health, safety, and welfare of the general public

Corrects a conflict within the updated code.

Strengthens or improves the code, and provides equivalent or better products, methods, or systems of construction

Corrects a conflict within the updated code.

Does not discriminate against materials, products, methods, or systems of construction of demonstrated capabilities

Corrects a conflict within the updated code.

Does not degrade the effectiveness of the code

Corrects a conflict within the updated code.

Is the proposed code modification part of a prior code version?

YES

The provisions contained in the proposed amendment are addressed in the applicable international code?

NO

The amendment demonstrates by evidence or data that the geographical jurisdiction of Florida exihibits a need to strengthen

the foundation code beyond the needs or regional variation addressed by the foundation code and why the proposed

amendment applies to the state?

OTHER

Explanation of Choice

Corrects an incorrect section reference.

The proposed amendment was submitted or attempted to be included in the foundation codes to avoid resubmission to the

Florida Building Code amendment process?

NO

(a.) Conflicts within the updated code;X

(b.) Conflicts between the updated code and the Florida Fire Prevention Code adopted pursuant to chapter

633;

(c.) Unintended results from the integration of previously adopted Florida-specific amendments with the

model code;

(d.) Equivalency of standards;

(e.) Changes to or inconsistencies with federal or state law;

(f.) Adoption of an updated edition of the National Electrical Code if the commission finds that delay of

implementing the updated edition causes undue hardship to stakeholders or otherwise threatens the public

health, safety, and welfare.

Accessibility2013 Glitch

Page 15 of 32

27/06/2013 Page 15 of 32

Pa

ge

: 1

http://w

ww

.flo

ridabuild

ing.o

rg/U

plo

ad/M

odifi

catio

ns/

Rendere

d/M

od_6200_T

ext

OfM

odifi

catio

n_1.p

ng

A6200 T

ex

t M

od

ific

ati

on

Accessibility2013 Glitch

Page 16 of 32

27/06/2013 Page 16 of 32

Attachments

T Stafford

No

4/27/2013

Approved as Submitted

1004.4

Pending Review

No

Proponent

Affects HVHZ

Date Submitted

TAC Recommendation

Section

Commission Action

A6201

10Chapter

Related Modifications

Summary of Modification

Corrects a conflict within the updated code.

Rationale

Conflict with updated code. The provisions of Chapter 11 have been deleted and reference the Florida Accessibility Code.

Fiscal Impact Statement

Impact to local entity relative to enforcement of code

No impact to local entities.

Impact to building and property owners relative to cost of compliance with code

No impact to building and property owners.

Impact to industry relative to the cost of compliance with code

No impact to industry.

Requirements

Has a reasonable and substantial connection with the health, safety, and welfare of the general public

Corrects a conflict within the updated code.

Strengthens or improves the code, and provides equivalent or better products, methods, or systems of construction

Corrects a conflict within the updated code.

Does not discriminate against materials, products, methods, or systems of construction of demonstrated capabilities

Corrects a conflict within the updated code.

Does not degrade the effectiveness of the code

Corrects a conflict within the updated code.

Is the proposed code modification part of a prior code version?

YES

The provisions contained in the proposed amendment are addressed in the applicable international code?

NO

The amendment demonstrates by evidence or data that the geographical jurisdiction of Florida exihibits a need to strengthen

the foundation code beyond the needs or regional variation addressed by the foundation code and why the proposed

amendment applies to the state?

OTHER

Explanation of Choice

Corrects and incorrect section reference.

The proposed amendment was submitted or attempted to be included in the foundation codes to avoid resubmission to the

Florida Building Code amendment process?

NO

(a.) Conflicts within the updated code;X

(b.) Conflicts between the updated code and the Florida Fire Prevention Code adopted pursuant to chapter

633;

(c.) Unintended results from the integration of previously adopted Florida-specific amendments with the

model code;

(d.) Equivalency of standards;

(e.) Changes to or inconsistencies with federal or state law;

(f.) Adoption of an updated edition of the National Electrical Code if the commission finds that delay of

implementing the updated edition causes undue hardship to stakeholders or otherwise threatens the public

health, safety, and welfare.

Accessibility2013 Glitch

Page 17 of 32

27/06/2013 Page 17 of 32

Pa

ge

: 1

http://w

ww

.flo

ridabuild

ing.o

rg/U

plo

ad/M

odifi

catio

ns/

Rendere

d/M

od_6201_T

ext

OfM

odifi

catio

n_1.p

ng

A6201 T

ex

t M

od

ific

ati

on

Accessibility2013 Glitch

Page 18 of 32

27/06/2013 Page 18 of 32

Attachments

T Stafford

No

4/27/2013

Approved as Submitted

1008.1.5

Pending Review

No

Proponent

Affects HVHZ

Date Submitted

TAC Recommendation

Section

Commission Action

A6202

10Chapter

Related Modifications

Summary of Modification

Corrects a conflict within the updated code.

Rationale

Conflict with updated code. The terms Type A and Type B Dwelling Units are not used by the Florida Accessibility Code.

Fiscal Impact Statement

Impact to local entity relative to enforcement of code

No impact to local entities.

Impact to building and property owners relative to cost of compliance with code

No impact to building and property owners.

Impact to industry relative to the cost of compliance with code

No impact to industry.

Requirements

Has a reasonable and substantial connection with the health, safety, and welfare of the general public

Corrects a conflict within the updated code.

Strengthens or improves the code, and provides equivalent or better products, methods, or systems of construction

Corrects a conflict within the updated code.

Does not discriminate against materials, products, methods, or systems of construction of demonstrated capabilities

Corrects a conflict within the updated code.

Does not degrade the effectiveness of the code

Corrects a conflict within the updated code.

Is the proposed code modification part of a prior code version?

YES

The provisions contained in the proposed amendment are addressed in the applicable international code?

NO

The amendment demonstrates by evidence or data that the geographical jurisdiction of Florida exihibits a need to strengthen

the foundation code beyond the needs or regional variation addressed by the foundation code and why the proposed

amendment applies to the state?

OTHER

Explanation of Choice

Corrects and incorrect section reference.

The proposed amendment was submitted or attempted to be included in the foundation codes to avoid resubmission to the

Florida Building Code amendment process?

NO

(a.) Conflicts within the updated code;X

(b.) Conflicts between the updated code and the Florida Fire Prevention Code adopted pursuant to chapter

633;

(c.) Unintended results from the integration of previously adopted Florida-specific amendments with the

model code;

(d.) Equivalency of standards;

(e.) Changes to or inconsistencies with federal or state law;

(f.) Adoption of an updated edition of the National Electrical Code if the commission finds that delay of

implementing the updated edition causes undue hardship to stakeholders or otherwise threatens the public

health, safety, and welfare.

Accessibility2013 Glitch

Page 19 of 32

27/06/2013 Page 19 of 32

Pa

ge

: 1

http://w

ww

.flo

ridabuild

ing.o

rg/U

plo

ad/M

odifi

catio

ns/

Rendere

d/M

od_6202_T

ext

OfM

odifi

catio

n_1.p

ng

A6202 T

ex

t M

od

ific

ati

on

Accessibility2013 Glitch

Page 20 of 32

27/06/2013 Page 20 of 32

Attachments

T Stafford

No

4/27/2013

Approved as Submitted

1009.4

Pending Review

No

Proponent

Affects HVHZ

Date Submitted

TAC Recommendation

Section

Commission Action

A6203

10Chapter

Related Modifications

Summary of Modification

Corrects a conflict within the updated code.

Rationale

Conflict with updated code. The provisions of Section 1007 have been deleted and reference the Florida Accessibility Code.

Fiscal Impact Statement

Impact to local entity relative to enforcement of code

No impact to local entities.

Impact to building and property owners relative to cost of compliance with code

No impact to building and property owners.

Impact to industry relative to the cost of compliance with code

No impact to industry.

Requirements

Has a reasonable and substantial connection with the health, safety, and welfare of the general public

Corrects a conflict within the updated code.

Strengthens or improves the code, and provides equivalent or better products, methods, or systems of construction

Corrects a conflict within the updated code.

Does not discriminate against materials, products, methods, or systems of construction of demonstrated capabilities

Corrects a conflict within the updated code.

Does not degrade the effectiveness of the code

Corrects a conflict within the updated code.

Is the proposed code modification part of a prior code version?

YES

The provisions contained in the proposed amendment are addressed in the applicable international code?

NO

The amendment demonstrates by evidence or data that the geographical jurisdiction of Florida exihibits a need to strengthen

the foundation code beyond the needs or regional variation addressed by the foundation code and why the proposed

amendment applies to the state?

OTHER

Explanation of Choice

Corrects and incorrect section reference.

The proposed amendment was submitted or attempted to be included in the foundation codes to avoid resubmission to the

Florida Building Code amendment process?

NO

(a.) Conflicts within the updated code;X

(b.) Conflicts between the updated code and the Florida Fire Prevention Code adopted pursuant to chapter

633;

(c.) Unintended results from the integration of previously adopted Florida-specific amendments with the

model code;

(d.) Equivalency of standards;

(e.) Changes to or inconsistencies with federal or state law;

(f.) Adoption of an updated edition of the National Electrical Code if the commission finds that delay of

implementing the updated edition causes undue hardship to stakeholders or otherwise threatens the public

health, safety, and welfare.

Accessibility2013 Glitch

Page 21 of 32

27/06/2013 Page 21 of 32

Pa

ge

: 1

http://w

ww

.flo

ridabuild

ing.o

rg/U

plo

ad/M

odifi

catio

ns/

Rendere

d/M

od_6203_T

ext

OfM

odifi

catio

n_1.p

ng

A6203 T

ex

t M

od

ific

ati

on

Accessibility2013 Glitch

Page 22 of 32

27/06/2013 Page 22 of 32

Attachments

T Stafford

No

4/27/2013

Approved as Submitted

1009.7.5.3

Pending Review

No

Proponent

Affects HVHZ

Date Submitted

TAC Recommendation

Section

Commission Action

A6204

10Chapter

Related Modifications

Summary of Modification

Corrects a conflict within the updated code.

Rationale

Conflict with updated code. The provisions of Section 1007 have been deleted and reference the Florida Accessibility Code.

Fiscal Impact Statement

Impact to local entity relative to enforcement of code

No impact to local entities.

Impact to building and property owners relative to cost of compliance with code

No impact to building and property owners.

Impact to industry relative to the cost of compliance with code

No impact to industry.

Requirements

Has a reasonable and substantial connection with the health, safety, and welfare of the general public

Corrects a conflict within the updated code.

Strengthens or improves the code, and provides equivalent or better products, methods, or systems of construction

Corrects a conflict within the updated code.

Does not discriminate against materials, products, methods, or systems of construction of demonstrated capabilities

Corrects a conflict within the updated code.

Does not degrade the effectiveness of the code

Corrects a conflict within the updated code.

Is the proposed code modification part of a prior code version?

YES

The provisions contained in the proposed amendment are addressed in the applicable international code?

NO

The amendment demonstrates by evidence or data that the geographical jurisdiction of Florida exihibits a need to strengthen

the foundation code beyond the needs or regional variation addressed by the foundation code and why the proposed

amendment applies to the state?

OTHER

Explanation of Choice

Corrects an incorrect section reference.

The proposed amendment was submitted or attempted to be included in the foundation codes to avoid resubmission to the

Florida Building Code amendment process?

NO

(a.) Conflicts within the updated code;X

(b.) Conflicts between the updated code and the Florida Fire Prevention Code adopted pursuant to chapter

633;

(c.) Unintended results from the integration of previously adopted Florida-specific amendments with the

model code;

(d.) Equivalency of standards;

(e.) Changes to or inconsistencies with federal or state law;

(f.) Adoption of an updated edition of the National Electrical Code if the commission finds that delay of

implementing the updated edition causes undue hardship to stakeholders or otherwise threatens the public

health, safety, and welfare.

Accessibility2013 Glitch

Page 23 of 32

27/06/2013 Page 23 of 32

Pa

ge

: 1

http://w

ww

.flo

ridabuild

ing.o

rg/U

plo

ad/M

odifi

catio

ns/

Rendere

d/M

od_6204_T

ext

OfM

odifi

catio

n_1.p

ng

A6204 T

ex

t M

od

ific

ati

on

Accessibility2013 Glitch

Page 24 of 32

27/06/2013 Page 24 of 32

Attachments

T Stafford

No

4/27/2013

Approved as Submitted

1010.7.4

Pending Review

No

Proponent

Affects HVHZ

Date Submitted

TAC Recommendation

Section

Commission Action

A6205

10Chapter

Related Modifications

Summary of Modification

Corrects a conflict within the updated code.

Rationale

Conflict with updated code. The provisions of Chapter 11 have been deleted and reference the Florida Accessibility Code.

Fiscal Impact Statement

Impact to local entity relative to enforcement of code

No impact to local entities.

Impact to building and property owners relative to cost of compliance with code

No impact to building and property owners.

Impact to industry relative to the cost of compliance with code

No impact to industry.

Requirements

Has a reasonable and substantial connection with the health, safety, and welfare of the general public

Corrects a conflict within the updated code.

Strengthens or improves the code, and provides equivalent or better products, methods, or systems of construction

Corrects a conflict within the updated code.

Does not discriminate against materials, products, methods, or systems of construction of demonstrated capabilities

Corrects a conflict within the updated code.

Does not degrade the effectiveness of the code

Corrects a conflict within the updated code.

Is the proposed code modification part of a prior code version?

YES

The provisions contained in the proposed amendment are addressed in the applicable international code?

NO

The amendment demonstrates by evidence or data that the geographical jurisdiction of Florida exihibits a need to strengthen

the foundation code beyond the needs or regional variation addressed by the foundation code and why the proposed

amendment applies to the state?

OTHER

Explanation of Choice

Corrects and incorrect section reference.

The proposed amendment was submitted or attempted to be included in the foundation codes to avoid resubmission to the

Florida Building Code amendment process?

NO

(a.) Conflicts within the updated code;X

(b.) Conflicts between the updated code and the Florida Fire Prevention Code adopted pursuant to chapter

633;

(c.) Unintended results from the integration of previously adopted Florida-specific amendments with the

model code;

(d.) Equivalency of standards;

(e.) Changes to or inconsistencies with federal or state law;

(f.) Adoption of an updated edition of the National Electrical Code if the commission finds that delay of

implementing the updated edition causes undue hardship to stakeholders or otherwise threatens the public

health, safety, and welfare.

Accessibility2013 Glitch

Page 25 of 32

27/06/2013 Page 25 of 32

Pa

ge

: 1

http://w

ww

.flo

ridabuild

ing.o

rg/U

plo

ad/M

odifi

catio

ns/

Rendere

d/M

od_6205_T

ext

OfM

odifi

catio

n_1.p

ng

A6205 T

ex

t M

od

ific

ati

on

Accessibility2013 Glitch

Page 26 of 32

27/06/2013 Page 26 of 32

Attachments

Ken Cureton

No

4/19/2013

Approved as Submitted

106

Pending Review

Yes

Proponent

Affects HVHZ

Date Submitted

TAC Recommendation

Section

Commission Action

A6083

11Chapter

Related Modifications

None

Summary of Modification

Revise the definition for the term “Commercial Facilities” for consistency with 28 CFR Part 36 (2010).

Rationale

Revise definition for “Commercial Facilities” for consistency with 28 CFR Part 36 (2010). See attached.

Fiscal Impact Statement

Impact to local entity relative to enforcement of code

None

Impact to building and property owners relative to cost of compliance with code

None

Impact to industry relative to the cost of compliance with code

None

Requirements

Has a reasonable and substantial connection with the health, safety, and welfare of the general public

Yes

Strengthens or improves the code, and provides equivalent or better products, methods, or systems of construction

Yes

Does not discriminate against materials, products, methods, or systems of construction of demonstrated capabilities

Does not discriminate against materials, products, methods, or systems of construction of demonstrated capabilities.

Does not degrade the effectiveness of the code

Does not degrade the effectiveness of the code.

Is the proposed code modification part of a prior code version?

YES

The provisions contained in the proposed amendment are addressed in the applicable international code?

NO

The amendment demonstrates by evidence or data that the geographical jurisdiction of Florida exihibits a need to strengthen

the foundation code beyond the needs or regional variation addressed by the foundation code and why the proposed

amendment applies to the state?

OTHER

Explanation of Choice

For consistency with Federal Law

The proposed amendment was submitted or attempted to be included in the foundation codes to avoid resubmission to the

Florida Building Code amendment process?

NO

(a.) Conflicts within the updated code;

(b.) Conflicts between the updated code and the Florida Fire Prevention Code adopted pursuant to chapter

633;

(c.) Unintended results from the integration of previously adopted Florida-specific amendments with the

model code;

(d.) Equivalency of standards;

(e.) Changes to or inconsistencies with federal or state law;X

(f.) Adoption of an updated edition of the National Electrical Code if the commission finds that delay of

implementing the updated edition causes undue hardship to stakeholders or otherwise threatens the public

health, safety, and welfare.

Accessibility2013 Glitch

Page 27 of 32

27/06/2013 Page 27 of 32

Pa

ge

: 1

http://w

ww

.flo

ridabuild

ing.o

rg/U

plo

ad/M

odifi

catio

ns/

Rendere

d/M

od_6083_T

ext

OfM

odifi

catio

n_1.p

ng

A6083 T

ex

t M

od

ific

ati

on

Accessibility2013 Glitch

Page 28 of 32

27/06/2013 Page 28 of 32

Pa

ge

: 1

http://w

ww

.flo

ridabuild

ing.o

rg/U

plo

ad/M

odifi

catio

ns/

Rendere

d/M

od_6083_R

atio

nale

_M

od 6

083 A

ttach

ment A

1_1.p

ng

A6083 R

ati

on

ale

Accessibility2013 Glitch

Page 29 of 32

27/06/2013 Page 29 of 32

Attachments

Ken Cureton

No

4/19/2013

Approved as Submitted

224

Pending Review

No

Proponent

Affects HVHZ

Date Submitted

TAC Recommendation

Section

Commission Action

A6084

11Chapter

Related Modifications

None

Summary of Modification

Revise Table 224.2 to correct tabular reference to indicate Section 224.6.3, which includes language regarding values in Table 224.2.

Rationale

Corrects tabular reference to indicate Section 224.6.3, which includes language regarding values in Table 224.2.

Fiscal Impact Statement

Impact to local entity relative to enforcement of code

None

Impact to building and property owners relative to cost of compliance with code

None

Impact to industry relative to the cost of compliance with code

None

Requirements

Has a reasonable and substantial connection with the health, safety, and welfare of the general public

Yes

Strengthens or improves the code, and provides equivalent or better products, methods, or systems of construction

Yes

Does not discriminate against materials, products, methods, or systems of construction of demonstrated capabilities

Does not discriminate against materials, products, methods, or systems of construction of demonstrated capabilities.

Does not degrade the effectiveness of the code

Does not degrade the effectiveness of the code.

Is the proposed code modification part of a prior code version?

YES

The provisions contained in the proposed amendment are addressed in the applicable international code?

NO

The amendment demonstrates by evidence or data that the geographical jurisdiction of Florida exihibits a need to strengthen

the foundation code beyond the needs or regional variation addressed by the foundation code and why the proposed

amendment applies to the state?

OTHER

Explanation of Choice

Editorial / correct reference section.

The proposed amendment was submitted or attempted to be included in the foundation codes to avoid resubmission to the

Florida Building Code amendment process?

NO

(a.) Conflicts within the updated code;X

(b.) Conflicts between the updated code and the Florida Fire Prevention Code adopted pursuant to chapter

633;

(c.) Unintended results from the integration of previously adopted Florida-specific amendments with the

model code;

(d.) Equivalency of standards;

(e.) Changes to or inconsistencies with federal or state law;

(f.) Adoption of an updated edition of the National Electrical Code if the commission finds that delay of

implementing the updated edition causes undue hardship to stakeholders or otherwise threatens the public

health, safety, and welfare.

Accessibility2013 Glitch

Page 30 of 32

27/06/2013 Page 30 of 32

Pa

ge

: 1

http://w

ww

.flo

ridabuild

ing.o

rg/U

plo

ad/M

odifi

catio

ns/

Rendere

d/M

od_6084_T

ext

OfM

odifi

catio

n_1.p

ng

A6084 T

ex

t M

od

ific

ati

on

Accessibility2013 Glitch

Page 31 of 32

27/06/2013 Page 31 of 32

Accessibility2013 Glitch

Page 32 of 32

27/06/2013 Page 32 of 32