Oath of Office approach to all interactions:

Before I start I’d like to point out this is a work in progress, and changes quite often. Not so much changes but continues to get fleshed out, based on comments I receive. One was do you have any practical experience with this process. So at the end is my personal story of how and why I am saying the things I do. For the record, it’s not a process, it’s the Law.

Anyone reading this needs to first comprehend that “Laws, of which there are many kinds”, follow a hierarchy, being stacked on top of each other. We have all heard of statutes, codes, regulates, rules, all “laws” within a select society. If you’re not in that society they do not pertain to you. You have to volunteer to be “governed” by them.

Beyond “these Laws” that we have been exposed to by “them”, there are other levels of laws that need to be “remembered”. If we would just remember, what we have always known, we could stop learning, and get on to doing. Because these laws are not written, they are the laws of reason, the laws between men. Even The Law, the law of reason, has a set of rules to follow..

Divine Law, Natural Law, the Law of Reason… then everything else in a lower order. To be lawful your law cannot break Divine, or Natural law, as long as it doesn’t, it is the law of your land.

The Law of reason we now call “Common Law”, before that it was known as Feudal Law.. So why the name changes? Because the creators of “their system” try to control everything by naming it. It is one of their beliefs, and so far it has worked out quite well for them. “Why do they call it Marijuana ? , Cause you can’t charge hemp”..

Go look at a dictionary; most any word commonly used today has only been in existence for 500 years or less. Either the original word’s spelling has been changed, or it’s a word derived from a Latin word. In their system, there is only one language recognized.. Latin, high Latin.. the stuff the Pope and Courts use.

When it comes to the definition to use, it depends on the venue it is used in… only a definition for use in Common Law can begin with the words.. “In Law”.. If it says in statute law, or English Common Law.. it is inferior to In Law or In Common Law with no other modifiers allowed. Focus on definitions that say “in Law, or at worst in common law, or feudal law… all others are inferior.

What they gave us is a slave’s language, full of magic words. Common words that have very different meanings depending on the venue. Here is one of my favorites.

The “Legal” definition of Lie: TO LIE. That which is proper, is fit; as, an action on the case lies for an injury committed without force; corporeal hereditaments lie in livery, that is, they pass by livery; incorporeal hereditaments lie in grant, that is, pass by the force of the grant, and without any livery. Vide Lying in grant.

Tell a prosecutor, “that’s a lie”, bingo… magic word, you just agreed that what he said was proper. However words have many meanings, the first part is what it means in an inferior “legal” setting, and the last part of Lie has to do with the common law definition. More on that later.

The point I’m trying to make is when you have an idea what to look for it’s easier to find. Or another way identify the problem(s), and your half way to the answer. When you read a definition or statute etc, that goes on and on.. forget it.. Most definitions that are Lawful are at most a paragraph, and usually much shorter.. (it doesn’t take long to tell the truth).

I know I’ll take a lot of shit for this, but I do believe that “they” do follow the rules. And once you learn the rules instead of arguing the facts, they will honor you.. after all it’s the Law. No source of Law under the Law of Reason no matter what it’s called (Case Law, English Common Law, UCC, US Codes, etc..) can overturn the ruling of “The Court of Record with Final jurisdiction”.. I mean you.

Everything they have done is lawful, and therefore Legal, and it is why you cannot “win” in their system. Under the system of “Legal” this is the power of the Magistrate (Judge):

When an officer acts in both a judicial and ministerial capacity, he may be compelled to perform ministerial acts in a particular way; but when he acts in a judicial capacity, he can only be required to proceed; the manner of doing so is left entirely to his judgment. See 2 Fairf. 377; Bac. Ab. Justices of the Peace, E; 1 Conn. 295; 3 Conn. 107; 9 Conn. 275; 12 Conn. 464; also Judicial; Mandamus; Sheriff (They just told you, you cannot win in any court that uses codified law, (their court), this is the venue in which the magistrate has “Judicial” authority”).

Late entry: Brothers and sisters that have responded via email thanks for pointing out to me that the above needs to be stressed.. I know this now because so many of your responses keep referring to “them not following” their own laws, statutes, codes etc.. They don’t have to… read the definition again… “he acts in a judicial capacity (Judge), …he can only be required to proceed; the manner of doing so is left entirely to his judgment. Where does it say he has to follow a stinkn statue? Have you ever heard them say…”In my court”… that what it is.. his court… so do not go to his court, take yours to him.. The statutes are just so many rabbit holes for you to chase..

The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over expecting a different result.. It’s insane to go to their jurisdiction, the moment you walk in you are an incompetent. Stop being double minded.

At any level in the “Legal system, including UCC and international law”, it’s up to the discretion of the magistrate, and why they can keep coming and coming, and coming… So do you want to go to “their” court, as described above, or “be the court”, the Supreme Court is talking about below.

However, no statutory or constitutional court (whether it be an appellate or supreme court) can second guess the judgment of a court of record. “The judgment of a court of record whose jurisdiction is final, is as conclusive on all the world as the judgment of this court would be. It is as conclusive on this court as it is on other courts. It puts an end to inquiry concerning the fact, by deciding it." Ex parte Watkins, 3 Pet., at 202-203. [cited by SCHNECKLOTH v. BUSTAMONTE, 412 U.S. 218, 255 (1973)]

Your court of record, doesn’t follow any written law either, your guide to the law is “reason”, what is reasonable. Since no 2 situations are exactly the same, it would be impossible to write a law that covers them.. (that’s why “they” have over 60,000,000 laws… and still want more).. Statute Law sold itself as the codification of the Common Law.. .. Under common law, or law, you are the Lawmaker.. it’s your wish that makes the law… if you can’t wrap your head around the difference… then go look at as many definitions of common law and sovereign as you need to till it does..

They are talking about you… as a King… a LandLord given a fee simple estate in lands and tenements, by the Ultimate Sovereign being. Something only a people can be.. (try finding the word person in the Bible).. You are the trinity of mind, body and spirit, and the Tribunal of the Court of Record with Final Jurisdiction… No ifs ands or buts… you have final jurisdiction in all cases involving your nation.

Why bring up the bible? Because it shows the two available systems “Lawful and Legal” running side by side. Or you can find it in movies, songs, comedy’s, on a bill board etc.. Clues to the difference and how to chose which one you live under. After all either you can govern yourself, or surly someone will govern you.

Finally before we get to things more relevant to our situation today we must consider who set up these 2 systems… none other than our friends the Jesuits. They were given the charter hundreds of years ago over banking, commerce, and education.. Need I say more.. But I will… what we have is the sharpest tacks in the drawer working on, contemplating, instituting, managing both systems. They don’t take sides, and definitely know what system is Lawful, and which one is merely Legal.

Crazy talk you say? The Jesuits, and Church running the show… ? Sure enough, here is an example:

King John's grant of England to the Pope May 15, 1213

"We wish it to be known to all of you, through this our charter, furnished with our seal, that inasmuch as we had offended in many ways God and our mother the holy church, and in consequence are known to have very much needed the divine mercy, and can not offer anything worthy for making due satisfaction to God and to the church unless we humiliate ourselves and our kingdoms: we, wishing to humiliate ourselves for Him who humiliated Himself for us unto death, the grace of the Holy Spirit inspiring, not induced by force or compelled by fear, but of our own good and spontaneous will and by the common counsel of our barons, do offer and freely concede to God and His holy apostles Peter and Paul and to our mother the holy Roman church, and to our lord pope Innocent and to his Catholic successors, the whole kingdom of England and the whole kingdom Ireland, with all their rights and appurtenances, for the remission of our own sins and of those of our whole race as well for the living as for the dead; and now receiving and holding them, as it were a vassal, from God and the Roman church, in the presence of that prudent man Pandulph, subdeacon and of the household of the lord pope, we perform and swear fealty for them to him our aforesaid lord pope Innocent, and his catholic successors and the Roman church, according to the form appended; and in the presence of the lord pope, if we shall be able to come before him, we shall do liege homage to him; binding our successors and our heirs by our wife forever, in similar manner to perform fealty and show homage to him who shall be chief pontiff at that time, and to the Roman church without demur."

England got a “Crown” in return, the City of London, the 1 mile square.. there are 2 other Crowns floating around out there… the Spanish have or had one for the great work the did for the Pope in Central and South America, Mexico, . The last one escapes me now..

Most of what “The Controllers” did is simply “divide and conquer” , Divide, divide, divide, hiding the truth in more and more falsehoods, sprinkled liberally with Fear. First divide the concept of One, into Good and Evil, then back both sides, then divide the concept of Man being a trinity of mind, body and spirit being one into separate ideas. Go around the world and collect all the ancient text, and claim they were all burned or destroyed. Then overtime “educate” the next generations with your version of history.. adding layers to the onion.

You are not an “I”, you are a “We”..

And in the pyramid of power that the public is, at some level in every organization a “magistrate” knows that you are a We. I believe there are certain positions in the Public you can go to that know exactly what the game is, and if approached in peace, will honor your position. Their positions straddle the Living and the Public. If you go to them in the Living (Private), you go to them as one of your trusted vassals, in the Public you go to them as one of their inferior slaves.

One last thing on the Jesuits, they are not the Masters of the system of the public, they are the referee. A vicious referee maybe, but much harsher on those who take oaths to a society (like the United States and its Constitution), than those who take an oath to the Creator. For the record, you have no Constitutional rights, what you have are all the rights of a King and they are unalienable.

However, with both systems up and running the Public sells one system over the other, using the systems of Commerce, Banking, and Education provided by the Jesuits and convince you “by your will”. Now, you and I find ourselves under the oppressive system, indoctrinated to believe they have authority over you. But change your will, and you can exit the legal system and enter the lawful one. The one in which you are a self governing King.. “ A republic if you can keep it” ..

And so, here is a glimpse of when the system of the Public got started..

Vienne, 1311-12,"whoever shall hereafter dare to assert, maintain, or pertinaciously hold that the rational or intellectual soul is not per se and essentially the form of the human body, is to be regarded as a heretic"; (First the truth had to be put in the Public Record, and then from there hid as best they could)

When the intellectual soul shows up in the form of a human body proclaiming the “Law of Reason” to not honor that is considered heresy. It really is that simple, the truth is always simple. “Simply proclaim that you are an immortal living soul, created in the image of God, and they have no jurisdiction”. If they balk, or test you don’t get upset.. simply ask them “are you saying, I am not an immortal living soul? If so I want to speak to your superior” Ask questions, give an order, don’t argue.

Here is what I have been working on… based on “Law”, where it all started. As this is a work in progress towards the end is the latest thoughts I will add into the body of the text when I flesh out what they mean to me.. Eventully (shortly), I’ll test it for myself..right now just trying to get it straight in my head… So what you read today may be different that what it reads tomorrow..

If you find this at all usefull, or even just interesting you need to bookmark this site:

http://www.mindserpent.com/American_History/books/Tucker/tucker_index.htm

A searchabe Blackstone Commentiaries linked with a 1828 dictionary.. marvolus.. I highly juggest you use this to look up terms, and phrases , and the actual text that I am using for my theorys.. also under the American History section are many other books…

Another great one: http://www.mindserpent.com/American_History/books/Vattel/vattel.htm

This is a book on the Law of Nations… hopefully if you read this you will come away with a compreshension that your body is the Land, Nation, State they are talking about, and your spirit is called things like Landlord, Price, King etc… Just this change in preception changes the meaning of these passages written long ago by folks that could see what was happening in real time.

I hope to give evidence to anyone taking the time to read this narative of the power of accepting a magistrates oath, and bond. I don’t need to see it, I don’t need a copy, I just need to accept them, his oath and bond.. and if that ends up being true, then the other points I lay out should make for interesting reading…

“Homage, on the other hand, only made its appearance when the relation became one of land as well as of persons. It was the recognition of service due to the lord, not merely as superior, but as the' giver of a benefice or fee.”

Under feudal law, homage was the ceremonial acknowledgment by a vassal of allegiance to his lord of whom he held land or whose overlordship he accepted. The act of homage was construed to be the confirmation by the lord of the vassal's own rights.”

I’ll explain the above shortly, and how to use it … but first..

All law is contract, all contract is Law… heard that before? I’m sure you have if you’re a member of this site.. But if everything in the PUBLIC is fiction does that not include the contracts made in the Pubic? They don’t exist in the real world, therefor they are not law.. The law of contracts is Common Law:

Wikipedia definiton of Common Law: In common law legal systems (connotation 2), the common law (connotation 1) is crucial to understanding almost all important areas of law. For example, in England and Wales and in most states of the United States, the basic law of contracts, torts and property do not exist in statute, but only in common law (though there may be isolated modifications enacted by statute).

Only “real” contracts fall under Common Law (the unwritten law of reason). And that is where you need to take your business, stop trying to win in their court, you cannot do it, unless they let you. In all statutory courts, where codes, rules, regulations are used, the magistrate has Judicial power, and the descresion to use his “judgment” on what the “rule” ment… no matter what it says on the paper… your screwed. Even if your using the UCC, you go to their court as a person, a soulless being, a person.

But under common law, the magistrate is merely there to administer the justice of the Tribunal of the Court of Record. I just described your relationship with a magistrate under common law… it’s you that are the tribual of the court of record… If you put him in this positon of “serving you” by accepting his bond and oath and administering your orders, by

God you better not turn around and “charge him”.. By Fielty and Homage under common law you are both intrusted with each others protection.

Under Common law, a magistrate “is” your adminstrative process… Give an order then… “so let it be written, so let it be done”… Let the magistrate do the paperwork, and when completed place your “Kings Seal on it, (Red Thumbprint) .

For you not to be a person, you have to be complete, a trinity of , mind, body, and spirit.. made in the image of God, now you are not a person, you are a people. Only a people has the trinity inside them, and that trinity is what makes the Tribunal of The Court of Record… The only other “Tribunal” there can be in a Court of Law is a Jury of Peers.. (and a United States Citizen is not a peer).., only other Trinitys are.

You as-king of your land are the tribunal of the court of record with final jurisdiction in your land. And a King is never Legally liable for anything.

Land, state, nation all share one definition….. people. You were created as a people, and under common law (not to your knowledge) , you yourself, set the wheels in motion to degenerate from a people into a person.. natural and/or artificial… either case… you are now inferior, and cannot form the trinity…within the jurisdiction of the Estate by will, thanks to your birth certificate..

Burn this into your conscience: You do not “own” anything.. To “own it” would mean when you die and your body wears out, that your immrortal soul would take a thing with it. The only one that can Own anything is the LANDLORD, the Creator of all. And this is the basis of Common Law, or better yet just Law. What he gave you is exlusive right of use of Land and tenaments in a Fee Simple Estate of Inheritance. This is the other parallel path to the PUBLIC that you can live in.

“THE LANDLORD” gave you an inheritance in land, your body.. your own nation, state, your private property… where you are King, and Landlord.. You cannot sell it, or give it away, you do not own it, its not yours. You are a tenant with exlusive right of use (private property). Now you are a Landlord, subject only to the Creator, King of your castle. All other land not given by the Creator in a fee simple estate to the immortal souls on Earth is Public Property for use by all. You can take from this Public property all you need for your use, you can claim right of use, but you cannot claim Allodial ownership. If you create somehting from the fruits of this public property, you can claim the right of use until your done with it as private property, but the onwership never is relenquished by the LANDLORD.

They want you to think you can Own things.. and profit from them, by charging your brother… Instead of saying ..isn’t this invention great, let me share it with my brother, they want to you claim ownership, and charge your brother. Chase that dollar.. You cannot own an idea, and if you think you can and get a patent on it… you will soon find out who owns it.. not you.. Ask the 6,500 patent holders of alternative energy devices. The patent was given because the device does work, but it is kept out of production, cause the Public has to control the Energy as part of controlling the sheep. You can however give the idea freely, and if someone wants one built, then a mans labor is worth his hire. It’s your labor that has value, not the thing.

What else can you do with this inheritance.. Go read Blackstone explaniation on a fee-simple estate.. one of the things you can do is convey (lease) it. You can lease your land under a

Fee Conditional Estate (an estate not of inheritance) to a tenant. It is a lease at your will to a tenant, and for that lease the tenant is supposed to pay Rent. This isn’t charging your brother, this is a mutual benifical arrangment. They want to use your private property, and their labor to create something that you both share.

Your Birth Certificate is a common law conveyance (lease) to a tenant of a small portion of land (your blood on the document), that allows the tenant access to incorpreal hereditaments that “issue” from or are annexed to the corpreal hereditaments.. (the land your body) , using an expressed trust… So your drop of blood, is the “twig” handed over under a common law “livery in seisin” ceremony.

Now I’ve heard the birth certificate described as a Will, and I don’t disagree, except to say that what it might be is a lease contract showing “your will as king” to allow and estate “at your pleasure”. You can stop it at any time… I don’t have a Birth Certificate to look at, but how many witnesses are there on the document? A valid will and testament requires 3 witnesses, and I think the BC only has 2.. Nevertheless Wills do not exist in Common Law, but “by your will” is always the Kings prerogative.

The Rights of Things. (Blackstone) Book II.Ch.7

property is frequently in one man, while the appendage or service is in another.

Property is frequently in one man (his body), while the appendage(your drop of blood) and service (to the Landlord, you), is in another.

Thus Gaius may be seised as of fee of a way leading over the land, of which Titius is seised in his demesne as of fee.

Thus Gaius (Gaius a celebrated Roman jurist. Scholars know very little of his personal life. It is impossible to discover even his full name, Gaius or Caius being merely his personal name (praenomen).) may be seised as of fee (an estate in trust) of a way ( Way: Method; scheme of management) leading (leading: Guidance; the act of conducting; direction) over the land, (seised: Ownership/right of use …when he has no dominion in the thing itself, as in the case of an incorporeal hereditament,) of which Titius is seised in his demesne as of fee (fee: A loan of land). (A man is said to be seised in his demesne as of fee of a corporeal inheritance, because he has a property dominicum or demesne in the thing itself)

Ok, what the heck does that mean: here is my take.. with you being represented by Titius.

Gaius represents a person.. There are lots of persons including government, corporations etc.. what they have in common is they are all fictions. The estate in trust is your B.C. which Gaius has a devised a scheme of management conducting the direction over the land (Titus, you).

The B.C. is a scheme to control you the Land.. which you agreed to under common law, “by your will”.. What they do not elaborate on is that this estate in trust to the public is “by your will” and can be recalled “by your will”.. further….

The fee-simple or inheritance of lands and tenements is generally vested and resides in some person or other (your body) ; though divers inferior estates may be carved out of it (drop of blood) . As if one (you) grants a lease for twenty-one years, or for one or two lives, the fee-simple remains vested in him (you) and his heirs ; and after the deterinitiation of those years or lives, the land reverts to the grantor(you) or his heirs, who shall hold it again in fee-simple. Yet some times the fee may be in abeyance, that is (as the word signifies) in expectation, remembrance, and contemplation in law there being no person in esse, in whom it can vest and abide : thmough the law considers it as always potentially existing, and ready to vest whenever a proper owner appears. (This explains it better than I ever can if you look up most of the words above in a law dictionary). But lets break it down anyway..

The fee-simple or inheritance of lands and tenements is generally vested and resides in some person or other ; (It resides in your natural person.. the real you is not your natural person, it just your land) it includes lands and tenements.. (look up tenements and follow the links)

though divers inferior estates may be carved out of it. As if one grants a lease for twenty-one years, or for one or two lives, the fee-simple remains vested in him and his heirs ; and after the deterinitiation of those years or lives, the land reverts to the grantor or his heirs, who shall hold it again in fee-simple. (This is your Birth Certificate, but what he does not say in this particular quote is that the lease is “at your will” … and when you change your will, the B.C Estate reverts to the King.. you)..

Yet some times the fee may be in abeyance, that is (as the word signifies) in expectation, remembrance, and contemplation in law there being no person in esse, in whom it can vest and abide (abeyance .. as in the King(your soul) has left his land… the whole idea for making you think you are person, instead of a people.. in esse ..in existence, no person in existence in whom the estate can return to).. So in law there is no person it can revert to…. Persons do not exist in law, persons are fiction… However…

though the law considers it as always potentially existing, and ready to vest whenever a proper owner appears ( The Law… common law (the unwritten law of reason) the only law between Men that exist says…. The BC Estate (and that of your ancestors) is ready to vest …. Proper owner appears.. They did not call him a person.. they called him an owner…

Owner… “The rightful proprietor; one who has the legal or rightful title, whether he is the possessor or not” .. Proprietor: By the gift of God, man is constituted the proprietor of the earth

The Law is just waiting for the MAN to stand up, show he is in existence (in esse), and not abeyance, so the BC Estate can vest in him.. Not only yours but your ancestors.

Vest, v.i. To come or descend to; to be fixed; to take effect, as a title or right. Upon the death of the ancestor, the estate, or the right to the estate, vests in the heir at law

You are also the heir, to your ancestors fee-simple estates, they are vested in you as an heir. But the “man” (owner) must claim them because the Law does not recognize persons…

56. Estates upon condition (lease) in law are such as have a condition impliedly annexed to them, without any condition being specified in the deed or will. Litt. s. 378, 380; Co. Litt. 215, b; 233, b; 234, b. (This is what the Birth Certificate represents, it is a Estate “By your will”, and can be collapsed or controlled “by your will”.. If you’re a person, they control by your will, if you’re a people, King, Landlord, a sovereign Nation State of one, then you can control it… “by your will” …

LEASE, contracts. A lease is a contract for the possession and profits of lands and tenements on one side, and a recompense of rent or other income on the other; Bac. Ab. Lease, in pr.; or else it is a conveyance of lands and tenements to a person for life, or years, or at will, in consideration of a return of rent, or other recompense .

57. Considered as to the title which may be had in them, estates are legal and equitable. 1. A legal estate is one, the right to which can be enforced in a court of law. 2. An equitable, is a right or interest in land, which not having the properties of a legal estate, but being merely a right of which courts of equity will take notice, require the aid of such a court to make it available. See, generally, Bouv. Inst. Index, h.t.

( This is an interesting statement… Your B.C. was given lawfully “by your will” under common law, by you the King, forming the Estate “MR ALL CAPS”.. The inferior courts of Equity even though they do not have legal title, they know it exist within their system and charge it.. ) Only “their” court of law (court of record) can enforce it.

If they cannot get your persons agreement (contract) in Equity, and you argue, they pull out “their” court of record… as only it can charge for contempt.. This what happens when the Judge leaves, comes back and the defendant (person) says one more thing and bam.. contempt … done when an equity court changed the form of the court to a court of law.. by the exit and return of the magistrate… ).. When he takes a recess, he is changing the form of the court.. The only time a Judge in Equity will pull out their court of record is to charge for contempt, or if you on the record.. ..but you can do so much better…

They have a “court of record”, but it has limited jurisdiction.. (only over persons).. You as a people, King.. Landlord, are Tribunal of THE most superior court on the earth.. as it applies to you… All you have to do is claim it… accept their oath and bond (homage and fealty to the grantor of the fee), make them “your man” and they are bound to carry out your orders, and give you competent advice, so everything is done in your best interest. All you have to do is ASK.. You are obligated upon accepting their oath to protect them.. this can happen automatically as a magistrate under common law is merely administering the orders of the Tribunal, and has no legal liability. At the end of the day he is going to produce the record in the public, for the agreement already in place in the private….

So how do you know if you are in a Court of Equity… if the plead choices are Guilty or Not Guilty.

Many want to know, including myself, what is the B.C. “worth” to the Public, or… what was it sold for.. recently I watched a Youtube vidoe from a guy named Bill Turner, I don’t know Bill from Adam, but his explaniaiton is as good as any other I have heard.. and that is.. that your B.C. is sold (monitized) for your birth weight in gold. Here is a link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cFykQwImGwM , then you decide. Your drop of blood as a baby, was given the same value as your birth weight in gold.

That is the amount the public gets to work with under your Estate by will, and by their own rules and more importantly under common law, they have to protect this estate, as it really

belongs to the LandLord.. they only have the right of use. They are expected to make a profit on this estate, but for the benefit of having this lease is they are supposed to be paying rent.. more on that soon..

Lets get to the meat..

You were given an inheritance in Land from THE LANDLORD in a Fee Simple Estate, making you king.. it came with land and tenaments. Both can be inherited by your heirs, but you cannot sell the land, give it away, etc… its not yours it’s THE LANDLORDS.. what your heirs don’t claim reverts to the Lord.. ashes to ashes, dust to dust.

You could however, lease your land in estate in fee for years, or at pleasure etc.. That is what the BC is.. it’s a lease, and they owe you Rent, it’s being held in reserve waiting for the LandLord that issued the lease to ask for it. It is either Rent or Rente.. in either case your rent is “reserved upon a lease”

The rent is based not just on your controbution, but all your ancestors as well. Theirs is being held back as “Treasure-Trove”.. It also looks that, “by your wil, and pleasure” you can shut down this Estate, anytime you want… (I’m just not sure what the “right” time is yet)…

But back to the Rent… what exactly does that mean? RENT, estates, contracts. A certain profit in money, provisions, chattels, or labor, issuing out of lands and tenements in retribution for the use.

There are many forms of Rent..I kinda like this one:

Rack-Rent - An annual rent of the full value of the tenement or near it.

Or it could be Rente:

RENTE. In the French funds this word is nearly synonymous with our word annuity.

RENTE FONCIERE. This is a technical phrase used in Louisiana. It is a rent which issues out of land, and it is of its essence that it be perpetual, for if it be made but for a limited time, it is a lease. It may, however, be extinguished. Civ. Code of Lo. art. 2750, 2759; Poth. h.t. Vide Ground-rent.

RENTE VIAGERE, French law. This term, which is used in Louisiana, signifies an annuity for life. Civ. Code of Lo. art. 2764; Poth. Du Contract de Constitution de Rente, n. 215.

So we got rent coming, and our inheritance from our ancestors, currently being held somewhere, whom do we see about this? … Since all “their courts” are in the fiction, they maybe able to get away with saying “it is outside our jurisdiction”.. after all, they are dead.. we need to be in the living to be a people…

Welcome your new best friend, The Coroner:

The post of coroner is ancient, dating from approximately the 11th century, shortly after the Norman conquest of England in 1066.

Coroner: n. [Law Lat., a crown.] An officer whose office is concerned principally with pleas of the crown. (Plea: In law, that which is alleged by a party (King) in support of his demand).

Coroners also have a role in treasure trove cases. This role arose from the ancient duty of the coroner as a protector of the property of the Crown (King, you).

The coroner's court is a court of law (Not a Court of Justice…) Practice is over, this is Law, not Justice..

It’s worth mentioning, that All courts of Justice, can be Courts of Law.. the magistrate has 2 duties, in a Court of Justice (Statute, Codes etc) he can Judge, in a Court of Law, he administers the justice of the Tribunal (you).. I’ve said it before but it bears repeating.. in equity the magistrate judges, in Common law he administers… your orders.. Their Court of record has limited jurisdiction, yours has final.

Next to the Sherriff’s office the Coroner is next in importance under Common Law, because the Coroner is responsible directly to the King for the Crowns (your) Property. I’m not sure that Corporate Sherriffs are the same as Common Law Sherriffs. They could be, but still, by Law the Coroner is responsible for the Crowns (your) Property. Besides who better to say your not dead (person) , than the Cornoner?

Remember this: Vienne, 1311-12,"whoever shall hereafter dare to assert, maintain, or pertinaciously hold that the rational or intellectual soul is not per se and essentially the form of the human body, is to be regarded as a heretic"; If you take your BC to the Cororner, and declair in his presence yourself as an immortal linving soul, accept his oath and bond, hand him the BC and order him to collect the rent, and return to you the inheritance passed down by your ancestors, by Law “they” have until 6pm, but not later than midnight to pay the rent..

Actually the cororner is even more important to the King, because the King appointed the Coroner to keep an eye on the sherriff.. and keep track of his property.

I should stop here to metion that All public officials are magistates.

MAGISTRATE, mun. law. A public civil officer, invested with some part of the legislative, executive, or judicial power given by the constitution. In a narrower sense this term includes only inferior judicial officers, as justices of the peace. 2. The president of the United States is the chief magistrate of this nation; the governors are the chief magistrates of their respective states.

All the above has lead to this…… my theory…

I think you can take your Birth Certificate to the Coroner, accept his oath and bond to the office he holds, hand him the BC, and tell him go collect my rent, and claim my ancestoral inheritance. Not only that, but he would inform the public that the King (your conscience, soul etc), has retruned to the manor, and is no longer in abayance.

But, You have to accept his oath, and bond (same with every Public Officer)… here is why:

Oath of Fealty - Swearing an Oath , Homage –service “bound” to render.

FEALTY. Fidelity, allegiance.2. Under the feudal system, every owner of lands held them of some superior lord, from whom or from whose ancestors, the tenant had received them. By this connexion the lord

became bound to protect the tenant in the enjoyment of the land granted to him; and, on the other hand, the tenant was bound to be faithful to his lord, and defend him against all his enemies. This obligation was called fidelitas, or fealty

OATH. A declaration made according to law, before a competent tribunal or officer, to tell the truth; or it is the act of one who, when lawfully required to tell the truth, takes God to witness that what he says is true. It is a religious act by which the party invokes God not only to witness the truth and sincerity of his promise, but also to avenge his imposture or violated faith, or in other words to punish his perjury if he shall be guilty of it.

2. It is proper to distinguish two things in oaths; 1. The invocation by which the God of truth, who knows all things, is taken to witness. 2. The imprecation by which he is asked as a just and all-powerful being, to punish perjury.

Among promissory oaths may be classed all those taken by public officers on entering into office, to support the constitution of the United States, and to perform the duties of the office.

This obligation on the part of the vasal was called his fidelitas or fealty ; and an oath of fealty was required, by the feodal law, to be taken by all tenants to their landlord, which is couched in almost the same terms as our antient oath of allegiance a : except that in the usual oath of fealty there was frequently a saving or exception of the faith due to a superior lord by name, under whom the landlord himself was perhaps only a tenant or vasal. But when the acknowledgment was made to the absolute superior himself, who was vasal to no man, it was no longer called the oath of fealty, but the oath of allegiance ; and therein the tenant swore to bear faith to his sovereign lord, in opposition to all men, without any saving or exception : "contra omnes homines fidelitatem fecit b." Land held by this exalted species of fealty was called feudum ligium, a liege fee ; the vasals homines ligii, or liege men : and the sovereign their dominus ligius, or liege lord. And when sovereign princes did homage to each other, for lands held under their respective sovereignties, a distinction was always made between simple homage, which was only an acknowledgment of tenure c ; and liege homage, which included the fealty before mentioned, and the services consequent upon it

Homage, on the other hand, only made its appearance when the relation became one of land as well as of persons. It was the recognition of service due to the lord, not merely as superior, but as the' giver of a benefice or fee. (the giver of the estate).. When the tenant had thus professed himself to be the man of his superior or lord, the next consideration was concerning the service, which, as such, he was bound to render (Homage is his Bond, Fealty is his oath)

Under feudal law, homage was the ceremonial acknowledgment by a vassal of allegiance to his lord of whom he held land or whose overlordship he accepted. The act of homage was construed to be the confirmation by the lord of the vassal's own rights. (They have signed a bond, as a ceremonial acknowledgment of their allegiance to the landlord).

CONFIRMATION, contracts, conveyancing. 1 . A contract by which that which was voidable, is made firm and unavoidable.. You confirm their bond by accepting it, making it unavoidable that they act in your best interest. Not doing so by them would be considered perjury, or better said heresy.

So where does that leave us?

By accepting his bond and oath, God is now his witness and judging his actions that he will do his utmost for the Landlord (people) that has just accepted it, and puts up his Bond to do so. (as well as risk the sin of Heresy (Perjury) for not) … and they know how the Jesuits feel about Heretics.

The ACT OF HOMAGE is completed when you accept his oath and bond, and he is “now your man”. You make a verbal contact with him, when you accept the oath, and bond he has taken, he is your man, and his rights (the right of use of the Bond, so serve in the Public) have been confirmed

YOU HAVE TO ACCEPT THE SERVANTS OATH and BOND, before it becomes unavoidable. From the Cop that just pulled you over, to the magistrate sitting on the bench, to the prison warden holding your loved ones, to the CFO of the Bank trying to Foreclose on you… ACCEPT THEIR OATH, and Bond, then lay down the LAW..

Be warned, having accepted their oath, you cannot “Charge” them with anything, unless they do not fulfill their duties… These are Your Vassals, to do the Kings work, so why would you charge them? Once you accept their oath and bond, these Vassals are required to act as your consultants in your affairs, for your best interest.. You just have to Ask…. And if they waver, ask them to call a superior, soon enough you will find someone high enough in the pyramid that will know exactly what you are talking about.

Lastly on the point of oaths, and bonds.. these Offices that other Men act in (coroner, Judge, Governor), came as part of the Estate by your will, (your B.C.), they are offices from you to them, they are “your offices” of your nation state, for your benefit.

No, I haven’t done it yet, like I said above I have a couple of other things to figure out… however the more I think about it, the sooner I’ll do it, and this exercise was as much for me as information for you.

However if you have any controversy to deal with in the PUBLIC, this will work, it’s all lawful, using their definitions of words, and Blackstone’s Commentaries on English Law Books I and II as a study guide. You can download these books at http://openlibrary.org/ I picked one that was edited in 1916 but there are many others.. These later versions use more common language (it’s the law of common law to as much as possible use common language of the day)… and have added comments from other Common Law authorities. Or use the link I gave at the top ….

You can fill out another affidavit, send reply letters, use the UCC as your guide, and seem to keep them at bay, until they come back again… or instead of saying….

“I’m here today as the Secured party creditor….and I conditionally accept your offer…

Say: “We the trinity of mind, body and spirit, created in the image of God, here as the Tribunal of the Court of Record, accept your oath and bond to be my man”.. (or accept your oath and bond to the office you hold).. “The court of record is now open”. Then tell them your “wish” .. the kings will,…. and let the Vassals go to work…

Common law requires a trial in open court; "open court" means a court to which the public has a right to be admitted. This term may mean either a court that has been formally

convened and declared open for the transaction of its proper judicial business or a court that is freely open to spectators.

I think the above could mean that you need to do your business with the officer in front of you, not with paper. That might come later, but first you need to walk in the valley in the shadow of death, and fear no evil.

The reality is this, you are King, they are the vassal. What kind of King will you be? For once you step out of the public and into the private you are no longer under the jurisdiction of a Court of Justice. Nope, now you have to answer to the Court of Conscience….

Fully developed by 17th-century European theology, the concept of the Court Of Conscience held that one's conscience would testify for or against one's actions in life after death. During life, the faculty of conscience was like, but not the same as, the voice of God. It drew on divine knowledge and precepts, and applied these laws in order to direct the individual toward right action and warn against wrong action. After life, the function of conscience was that of a record—animated, if you will—that would speak to a divine tribunal, in judgment for or against you. Even if one's conscience was or seemed dormant (inactive, flawed, 'seared', asleep, etc.) during one's life—as was said to be the case in the worst of villains -- it came fully to life with a perfect and true memory of all one's actions before God.

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Court_of_Conscience"

You may get called into the Court of Conscience for not being a King of peace, bringing harmony to the dual system outlined by the Bible. And the only way to bring peace to the system is for you as King to forgive. After all “forgiveness is the only claim upon which relief can be granted”..

There is no need to go to war, the system is overwhelmingly weighted in your favor as a King of a self goverening nation with no subjets. (But “they” are your servants)..

If you’ve read this far, thanks for the interest.. It may seem like a lot to take in and foreign in many ways but ponder it for a while go to the links at the top, and just read what they say with the idea that you are a Trinity, and Landlord, that your body is a nation… Maybe your not ready to go talk to the cororer, yet have a pressing Public issue to deal with today… Then lets takle that.. after all you have to learn to crawl before you an walk…

The lower level of the pyramid know nothing about this, not suprising because if they did they would’nt participate. So a traffic cop, or other entry level employee may not have any idea what your talking about. And that is our fault. They are not the enemey, they are our brothers, misguided and taught faleshoods same as us.. So don’t threaten them, or charge them, inform them.

Same with attorneys (esq.) , when the Jesuits took over education they set up todays modern universities and colleges. In their “law schools” they only taught Civil Law (statute law).. they mentioned common law, but taught Civil Law …incendently all codified inferior law has its roots in Canon Law (Civil, Statute, Code etc.. )

Blackstone notes this in his commentaires, and what it would mean in the future.. They could see it in the 17th century, and no one paid attention.

Anyway some ideas on different situations you may need to deal with now.. First and foremost if you screw up, and get double minded thinking they have jurisdiciton over you be comforted with this, a King can never lose his prerogitve, you can always reqroup.. Robert

Bork said in his Supreme Court confirmation hearing that all persons in prision volenteered to be there… they consented to jurisditicion … Never, never consent to their jurisdiciton. I have a little experiece dealing with the public using these ideas that I retell at the end of this document. But here is what I might do given the circumstances.

Routine traffic stop.. (no one injured).. Cop… licence, registratoin, and proof of insurance…or Do you know why I am stopping you.. whatever his opening line.. You.. Forgive me officer, you seem to have me confused with a person, I am not a person I am a people, a trinity of mind, body and spirit, created in the image of God. Before you make a mistake I am obligated to inform you that you have no jurisdiciton over people, only over persons. Cop… what the heck are you talking about, … are you some kind of wiseguy (you are), give me your licence, registration, and insurance or I’m going to arrest you..

You… Brother I have no desire to charge you with bringing a controversy into my life. If you do not understand what I have told you, then for your own protection go to your car and contact a magistrate, and ask them if you have any jurisdiction over an immortal living soul. Your ignorance of the law is no excuse, and if you presist I’ll be forced to arrest the bond of the franchise your represent.

Cop, I’ll give you one more chance to cooperate.

You.. Very well, than on and for the record, I accept your oath and bond for the office you occupy, and that of your superiors. I am the tribuanl of the Court of Record, and I order you to immediately return to your vehicle and leave me in peace. If you refuse, then bring your superior before me, so I can lay down the law.

(who knows what will happen)..

IRS issue… You..calling the investigator or see their “person”.. Forgive me for my doublemindedness till this point. As you can imagine it can be difficult to distinguish fiction from reality. But after much soulseaching I found it. I am an immortal living soul created in the Image of God, and I ask ..why are you charging your brother? Why are you causing controversy and distubing the peace?

IRS…. I don’t know what you are talking about..

You… maybe you do, maybe you don’t.. maybe your testing me.. whatever you motive I can see where my past might lead you to believe that I am the Taxpayer. But for the record, I am the trinity of body, mind, and spirit, here today as one of the people, and your overlord. You are a servant of the people, and if you continue to disturb the peace, and fail to uphold your oath and bond to the landlords who control your existance I’ll find you in contempt of the Court of Record with final jurisdiction. As my man my wish is that you balance the books by the end of the day and remove the controversy.

IRS …. Are you threating the IRS..

You… I cannot threaten a ficiton, and I’m cautioning you not to violate your oath and bond.. If you do not understand my orders to you, then for your own protection you are to contact a high magistrate of your Tax Court for guidance, and by the end of the day confirm to me that the books have been balanced.

Court… You.. from the gallery.. “We the trinity of mind, body, and spirit, here today as the tribunal of ‘The Court of Record, with final jurisdiciton” , accept your oath and bond, and order that “this court” (their court), has no jurisdiciton in this matter. All originals are to be handed over to the Tribunal, and all copies are to be stricken from the Public Record.. Magistrare, would it be more comfortable for you if we did this in your chambers?

(I don’t care why your going to court… foreclosure, Tax, traffic, civil or criminal, you have final jurisdiction as the court of record with access to the prerogative writs only available to the sovereign.. check them out sometime.)… you can demand all originals, tell their court they have no jurisditon, etc.. They never have persona jurisdiction over you, unless you consent… be a people not a person..

You are a people, and they have no jurisdictoin over people, simple as that.. If you attempt using this info and feel yourself slipping just go back to that… What jurisdiction do you have over people.

That is the only issue you are interested in, no matter where they want to take it, it’s your parachute. They either produce the claim showing jurisdiction over a people, or leave me now in peace.

There is no need to go to war with them, and if you are now, stop…. Forgive yourself because you didn’t know better. Now you do, so move ahead, and stop looking back. Make them “your man” to administer your orders.. it’s why the took the oath and bond in the first place.

Ok, not sure where to go next with this other than put it to the test. Having put it in words has help me get closer to the inner peace I’m looking for before acting. I have experience in less involved settings with some of this, little test, that I asked for (careful what you ask for).. Great learning experiences.. I’ll share them below, but for the particular question of accepting their oath, the court of record adjourns.

This final leg of the journey got started in earnest for me a little over a year ago.. the year prior to that was mostly listening to a few talkshoes and reading others work. But things really started to get tough economically for me.

10 years before I owned a company with 12 employees, and offered a needed service in the economy of the time. Slowly over time what had been a pride of mine to belong to became an anchor around my neck. Driving me deeper and deeper into a unwanted seclusion. Watching the world go by, wondering just what the hell had happened, blaming everyone self included. Year after year, worse then before. I had gotten so far behind in Child Support that I was arrested once, paid enough to get out, the amount went up again, and bingo, another warrant is issued.. Paid that one down .. then bingo again.. another warrant.. still on the books..

To the point that about a year and a half ago I asked the creator to show me the truth and I would not look away.. Just show me which way to go. His answer apparently was a solid 8 months of no work. At the time I was less than 60 days from being broke, so it was a heck of a ride..

But I used that time as wisely as I felt I could.. I listened to many more talkshoes, or Creditors in Commerce audios, Jean Keating, Rod Class, Dave Mack, Angela, Batman, and many many others. Along with that was learning to distinguish between legal and lawful, be it a definition or explanation. 8, 10 or more hours a day… listen, read, contemplate..

Finally toward the end of this era, every “utility” or service was within 30 days of being shut off. The rent was 6 months past due, car needed work… and..and..and..

So I did my first A4V… with the IRS… I had them send me a list of all the outstanding charges against the Name (about $150,000) Accepted the top copy for value, placed my red thumb print on it and the rest, made up a blank money order, and a simple contract and sent it in.. Basically if I don’t hear back by affidavit or your keep my money order then we have a binding contract, and the debt is settled..

Off it went.. didn’t hear back.. Considered it over.. So what next.. How about the Utility and Service companies.. But this time I used some information from Jean Keating and others.. that by the UCC it was a Mistake in fact that they we charging me.. That in fact the coupon they sent monthly and wanted returned with payment, was in fact the payment from the Estate to settle the debt. And that the payments I had sent were done as a mistake in fact. That it appeared to me that this coupon was set aside by them in an escrow account attached to the Accountholder (Mr. All CAPs), that they claimed after 3 years as abandoned property. I presumed this to be the case, and therefore they were to pay the outstanding debt out of these funds in escrow and send me a check for the remainder.. In the mean time if I did not receive a rebuttal by affidavit and the service was to be cutoff, that they agreed to compensate me $5,000,000 prior to termination of service. These went to the CFO’s …

I did this with 5 different accounts, and only one responded, the Electric utility…

Their first response, was on a “blank” sheet of paper not company letter head, no signature, only the company name spelled in all caps at the bottom.. it was a one line reply.

“To avoid an interruption in service, please pay in legal tender”.

I replied to this, thanking them for accepting the offer as sent to them, as they had not responded by affidavit within the allotted time, and we therefore had and agreement, and now a binding contract. Please send me the remainder of the funds from the escrow account.

Their reply… again on blank paper…

Your letters are meaningless, to avoid an interruption in service, please pay in legal tender..

So I asked myself what is legal tender.. (I had an idea, but I wanted to see it from end to end).. after some research, it came down to my belief that I could make up my own money order and send it to them. It’s what I did with the IRS, and 2 months later the IRS hadn’t broken down my door yet.

So I sent them a money order for $2,000 for a $450.00 bill, and said here is your legal tender, monetize it, settle the debt and send me a check for the remainder. If they did not return it to me with in 7 days I considered the debt settled, and would be paying future debts the same way, and in the mean time send me my check for the remainder…

There reply to that was much thicker….

Out comes the company letter head, with titles, signatures etc… but what they sent me was a CC copy of what they had sent to the assistant federal prosecutor.. they were recommending to the prosecutor that he might want to investigate an apparent counterfeit money order (they had apparently sent the original to the prosecutor). And..and… and… Things are going to a different level..but after a couple of day I decided to handle it this way..

I wrote my reply to the prosecutor, and CC to the utility.. I told him I felt it my obligation to inform him that what the utility had sent them, if the same as they had sent me was not a complete copy of our contract. And since his involvement would be as a 3rd party intervener, and I did not want to compromise him into that position I could not send him an entire copy, but he should demand it from the Utility.

However if he decided to further the investigation I demanded his affidavit stating his authority over a private contract, and how any statute overrode the maxims of law, or the UCC. Further if the utility claimed to send him the original, then why the Board of Directors of the Utility should not be charged for counterfeiting a negotiable instrument, as they had sent me one.. copy attached.

Out it went, and till this day 7 months later I have never heard from the Federal prosecutor office.. at least directly.. more on that later.. and nothing else from the Utility until..

About day 86 since last payment I get a knock on the door at about 8AM… I open it to find a short squat hard hat wearing, scuffed booted, clipboard carrying Utility representative.. “are you MR All Caps.. ?” Who are you? , … I’m from consumers and here to turn off your power.. .. Did you bring a check? (remember the $5,000,000).. What are you talking about she says….

I said I have a private contract with your corporation, and seeing as how you represent them I guess you want to be an interested party, let me get you a copy of the agreement.. (in an envelope over the meter).. You can’t sue me she says… I not going to sue you I said, I’m going to lien all the interested parties to the contract if I do not get my check before the power is interrupted, so here is your copy, you might want to go to your truck and read it..

You can’t threaten me… “they” say your suing the CFO for counterfeiting”… I’m not suing anyone, I have a private contact, if I need to I may lien someone’s bond, but I’m not suing anyone..

So as she was headed to her truck, I made a mad dash to the kitchen to get a pot of coffee brewing, as I had no idea what would happen next… but a couple of minutes later I looked out and she was gone… Hey this shit does work!!!

Or it did till the next day, when about the same time, her and her boss show up and without knocking get ready to do their business. Hey I said, who are you? Consumers Energy, and we are turning off your power.. Got any ID? I don’t have to show you ID he said, …. It’s for our protection..

What do you mean you don’t have to show ID, you’re a public employee, and you do not have to show ID? Consumers is a private corporation.. No I said, it’s a public utility regulated by the government, making you a public servant, are you refusing to identify yourself? He said nothing …

How about you I said to the girl… Hey I’m just doing my job.. No I said, you’re a stranger trespassing on my property, and I guess I need to call the sheriff… I went to get the phone, just started dialing when she pulled the plug, and I lost the dial tone.. (I have Vonage)… and off they went, 2 days before thanksgiving.. leaving me in the soon to be dark…

Long story shorter… for the next 10 days I lived with out electricity, and had to use the library to “write” a couple of judges, and the Director of the IRS Criminal Investigation Division.. asking for the fraud to be looked into… but with no apparent change after 10 days, I relented to my moms concerns and had the power turned back on. … and time for the next chapter..

I had no other replies from any providers, (I had sent out 3 other money orders as an attempt to pay with legal tender)..

Soon after power was restored, Jean Keating was on a number of talkshoes, and he kept mentioning IRS Manual 6209, in which is shows among other things what class tax applies to every IRS form or publication.. and can you believe it, all W-2’s and 1099’s are considered “Class 5 Gift Tax” , further if you asked for your IMF (Individual Master File) it would show that most people are not required to fill out a 1040.. (it’s really not the right form for Gift tax… I think its 706 and 709)..

But by “mistake of fact” we have put it down on the income line of a 1040 form… The UCC says once a mistake of fact is recognized it voids any contract the mistake is part of… So I wrote the IRS claimed mistake of fact for the Taxpayer, and asked for an audit from the inception of the taxpayer, to correct the mistake of fact, and return any notes or securities that may have been sent do to mistake in fact, including any unjust enrichment they may have produced..

No reply… so in early January I was deciding what to try next… and was inspired to write the Inspector General of the Treasury, pointing out the apparent fraud of the IRS… I think I just did it via email thru the Treasury Website..

About a 10 days later I got a call, and it was game on… A special agent of the Inspector General of the Treasury called me.. and asked was I Mr. All caps… I asked, who is asking… and he gave his name and title.. for now we will call him John. I said John, I represent the name you mentioned, but no it is not me, how can I help you…

You sent an email to the IG, and we are not sure what you are asking, is there any chance we can meet to discuss it.. Well thanks for calling I said, sure when would you like to meet? John said, how about tomorrow at the federal building, I’m out of town today but will be back then.. He said the town he was in, so I said, well John, your driving right by address of the taxpayer, why not just stop in..

Well I guess I could he said, but it would be more convenient if you went to my office.. But John I said, who is getting paid to do this? Well Ok he says, it’s not that big of deal how

about 10 am.. Ok I said, any idea how long this will take… Oh could be 5 minutes could be a half an hour…

Ok then, call me when you get close and I’ll make sure I’m here.

Next day about 5 after 10 the phone rings, and John says.. hey ..my partner needed to use the restroom so we stopped at the diner just down the road, how about meeting us here for a cup of coffee.. (realizing their concern of running into a nutter I said sure, be down in about 10 minutes)..

The diner is less than ¼ mile away so I decided to walk, give myself the think of what I would say, and calm my spirit abit.. It was a cold, crisp, blue sky winter day in Michigan, glad I walked.. cause during the walk I decided on my opening line.. something I had heard on a talkshoe..

I walk in looking for 2 guys in suits.. don’t see any… hmmmmm.. then a guy in the corner stands up and says … Bob!! And there is a table with one guy and 3 cups of coffee… (I guess his partner has a weak bladder cause he was still in the restroom)… So as I reached the table and John stood up I took his hand and said.. Some think that shaking another’s hand is a sign of consenting to jurisdiction, but for the record, that is not so in this case”

That lit up Johns eyes.. he said, is that so… but cannot 2 men extend each other pleasantries? Yes John 2 men can, but not 2 persons.. As I was sitting down, and saying So John how can I help you? A person crossed behind me and took the other chair..

Now both treasury agents are sitting , one John about my age, early 50’s and a young guy maybe late 20’s… and John says to his partner what I had said to him when I sat down.. to which he said “really”.

John gave me his business card, and said, so what is it you are asking the IG to do, and then handed me a copy of the email I had sent the IG.. I said well look, I’m just a peaceful inhabitant, and represent the Trust MR ALL CAPS… It came to my attention that by mistake of fact the wrong IRS forms have been filled out for the taxpayer, and I just want to set the record straight.

He had a copy of what I had sent to the IRS, and said so this is the document you are talking about.. Well John, it’s more than a document, it’s a contract in the private, and by the UCC it is now a binding contract, but I have not heard from the IRS..

But you don’t have a signature on it he says.. Sure I do, and pointed out my thumbprint… on the original its in Red I told him.. Where is the date? Only persons use dates, its part of their system. This was sent by a man, and a man has no calendar.

Then he shifted to how was it that I came to believe the things I was saying.. I said by listening to other people, and doing my own research.. He said people like..@@@@@ . I said sorry he is not familiar to me, who is he… John said, he is in federal prison for tax evasion.

Well John, I’m not evading taxes, they do not apply to me.. they may apply to the TAXPAYER, but that is not me, I just represent him.. however as I pointed out I just want to set the record straight with the IRS but they refuse to respond, have not sent a rebuttal by affidavit as required, and therefore agree with me, so how can I be avoiding anything?

Then we went into where I grew up, what my parents did, did I have brothers and sisters, what I did for work etc… I answered them all, then said, but John, you already know all this or could.

This chit chat got us through our first cup of coffee , then early in the 2nd it got interesting.. He asked me had I done any other letters, or things? I said matter of fact John I have, I have sent out a number of private contracts under international law, none have been returned or rebutted by affidavit, and are therefore now binding on the recipients yet they refuse to follow the contract. Can you help with that?

Like what he says, what did you send them… so I told him the whole story about the electric utility.. So you sent them a money order he said, ….well not me.. my natural person did.. Mr. Signature..

Then he said.. is this it here, and reached into a manila envelope and pulled out one of various pieces of paper in it…. It happened to be the “money order” to the utility and the letter they had sent to the Federal prosecutor. So as he is handing it to me I’m thinking.. hmmm wonder where this is headed.. but to late to turn back…

So I took it, looked it over, looked John in the eye, and said, No John this is not mine, this is a counterfeit copy of mine, mine has a blue ink signature, and since it was never returned, it was accepted as payment, when you get back to your office can you ask this prosecutor to inquire with the utility why they are again threatening me with another interruption in power? And handed it back to him…

For one of the few times the young guy spoke up… so your saying this is a counterfeit copy? Sure I said, look at it, it is a full size copy of a negotiable instrument. If I did that with a dollar bill would it not be illegal.. He said so what is the stamp for on the bottom of the letter to the prosecutor? I said that puts it under the UPU, in international law, and out of your jurisdiction. Then he went quiet again..

So what account and bank is it drawn against John asked… here..this is the account number (I pointed to the SSN without dashes) and this is the bank.. (Treasury of the United States of America)..

John changed gears a little.. so what did you do when they came and turned your power off? You mean after they reneged on our contract… well John it was 2 days before Thanksgiving, and my kids were coming over for diner, so I spent most the first 2 days making other arrangements… But after a long holiday weekend without power, the only option left seemed to be to Lien the Board of Trustees as specified in the contract.. but in my heart that didn’t seem correct. If I lien the CFO I am affecting his family and they haven’t done anything to me… so I sent letters to a couple of Judges, and CID of the IRS.. None of it lead to anything so under pressure from my family I relented and paid the bill..

John said, well the money order is for $2,000, how much was your bill.. Well the bill was about $450.00 but I hadn’t worked in a while and needed some extra cash… John say’s from the utility company? I said why not, there just a bank, they monetize the coupon they send me, why not this?

Have you done any other Money orders… ? Yeah, couple of 3, but they were ignored also…

John says: You know Bob, many people are in prison for sending similar things… I said John, I respectfully disagree, there are no people in prison, only persons, if they knew they were a people they would be out immediately as you have no jurisdiction over people.

You not worried about being arrested ? John says… No John, you cant arrest me, I’m not a commodity. You could send 12 men, trespass on my property, destroy my house, shoot my dog, scare my kids, and kidnap me… but you cannot arrest me… I am not a person, and you have no jurisdiction..

Next thing I know we are getting our 3rd cup of coffee, some idle chit-chat ….

So where do you live… (A) I live in this vessel provided by the Creator. But you walked over here from somewhere else..(A).. I sometimes harbor my vessel at a local residence, but I never leave the vessel.

What do you consider yourself.. (A) … Well I used to consider myself a homo-sapiens, but the dictionary is so corrupted that now Homo means servant, and I am not a servant wise man.

Are you not a servant of God? (A), I think that’s a bad choice of words, we all have a spark of God in us, and I was created in his image, I think that makes me a child of God, not a servant of god, and since I am male in form, I guess I am a Son of God..

Do you consider yourself a Christian.. (A) again I guess it depends on the definition.. but for the record there is only one creator, God.. and who knows how many religions… I choose the simple route and just go directly to the creator.

Do you talk to God.. (A) all the time… bunch of times since I sat down with you..

Anyway eventually the young gun goes the restroom again.. when he was gone, John says to me… “I have been at this for over 15 years, and yours is the most intelligent explanation of why someone believes the way he does”.. That’s comforting to here John, but it doesn’t give me a remedy.. can you help me with that? Like what he says..

How about the bank? Nope, How about the utilities? Nope, can you tell me what you can help me with? Nope.. Ok, then I’ll quit asking.

So after his partner returned, and a little more idle talk John said, so what are you going to do next.. ? Not sure John, like I said I have a problem with liens. There has to be an easier way, and I’ll keep looking for it… Not sure exactly what it is, except that it will have to do with ordering it done, not requesting.

I could tell the conversation was coming to an end, so I asked John a question… John, like I said, I have a dog, and often one or more of my kids are over for the night. I don’t want them scared, or my dog shot, so is there any reason for me to worry about being kidnapped anytime soon.., because if so you are hereby noticed that I will go peacefully, without need of a militaristic response from the Public..

He looked at his young partner and said…I know I’ll take shit all the way to the office from him, for acting like a social worker, but in this case I’d have to say no, you do not have to worry. Unless you keep sending money orders, or put a lien on someone.. No John I’m done with that, next time you might hear from me is when I figure out how to order it done, not request it…

Then that’s good enough he said, and we have to get going to our next appointment.. We all stood up, shook hand, and went our separate ways… that was in January, and here in May I’m putting the final touches on my comprehension to see if I can make that happen… Just order it done, and always remember I am a people, and they have no jurisdiction..

In closing, and not to be boastful but to offer hope.. the agent actually told me 3 different time how intelligent my explanations were.. that has to mean something.. On top of that by their rules they had the evidence to arrest me… if I was under their jurisdiction.. heck I told them what I had done.. so either they had no jurisdiction, or they aided the escape of a felon… Warrant for back child support , A4V of IRS issues, Money orders off my printer… come on.. Did they let me go, or do they not have jurisdiction.

That’s why I write things like this and put it out there… I want them to know me.. I am a people and they have no jurisdiction. I do not want to disturb the peace, so try to gain the knowledge necessary not to have to charge anyone, simply order it done… Good luck to everyone and see you on the other side.