academic profession k.c. ting, ph.d., p.e. professor and head agricultural and biological...
TRANSCRIPT
Academic Profession
K.C. Ting, Ph.D., P.E.
Professor and Head
Agricultural and Biological Engineering Department
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Urbana, Illinois
USA
Academic Profession
Contents
• Academic Infrastructure
• Academic Responsibilities
• Performance Evaluation
• Institutional Culture
• Collegiality
• Professional Network
• Diversity
• Resource Generation and Utilization
• Faculty Issues vs. Administration Issues
• Getting Started and Professional Development
Academic Infrastructure
• University
• College
• Department
• Program
• School
• Institute
• Division
• Section
• Unit
• Group
• Center
• Office
Etc.
Academic Departments
* Administrative units which provide a discipline-oriented home base for faculty, staff, and students to develop, coordinate, manage, implement, evaluate, and modify teaching, research, and outreach programs.
* Resources - human, facility, financial, information, time, infrastructure, department by-laws, pattern of administration, etc.
* Processes - teaching, research, and outreach programs; administrative, service, and operational functions; academic, professional and social activities, etc.
* Deliverables - a learning organization; educated and trained professionals; generated and disseminated information; technical and professional services; development of discipline-oriented expertise; contribution to multiple-disciplinary programs; etc.
Academic Responsibilities
• Teaching
(Credit-Generating Instruction; Outreach/Extension Education)
• Research
(Discovery; Synthesis, Integration; Implementation)
• Service
(Academic; Administrative; Professional; Public; Community)
Unit Programs and Functions
Member of the Unit
PerformanceActivities
Teaching
Research
Service
Presence/ Support
Effort Excellence Scholarship/ Impact
Alignment
Increasing Value
Performance Matrix
Programs
Functions
K.C. Ting, June 2005
Performance Evaluation
Promotion and Tenure Process
• Guiding principles
• Policies and Procedures
• Schedules
• Documentations
• Resources
• PreparationsExample: http://www.provost.uiuc.edu/provost/communications/comm9/comm9criteriaprint.htm
Institutional Culture
- The way things are interpreted and done, as well as how people behave
Three aspects:
Values aspect –
Beliefs, Purposes
Rational aspect –
Structures, Systems
People aspect –
Attitudes, Behaviors
ABE Dept
ABE Dept Functions are:Teaching (Credit Generating & Extension)
ResearchService
TeachingResearchService
ExtensionResident
AE GraduateProgram
AE Undergraduate
Program
TSMUndergraduate
Program
Structures andEnvironment
Safety
Soil & Water Resources
Engineering
Bioenvironmental Engineering
Food and Bioprocess Engineering
Off-Road Equipment Engineering
Soil and Water Resources Engineering
Cross Functional and International Activities
Professional
Administrative
Community
Informational
Organization Chart of Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering (ABE),
College of Agricultural, Consumer, and Environmental Sciences (ACES)
College of Engineering (COE)
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC)
ACES and COE
Collegiality
- Professional relationships and interpersonal skills at work place -
• Short term relationship
• Long term relationship
• Understand generally accepted behavior and practices
• Expand complementary interests
• Mitigate conflicting goals (manage differences constructively)
• The importance of communication
• The last resort
Professional Network
• Establish collaboration
• Broaden views
• Keep informed
• Gain access
• Gather support
• Share opportunities
• Contribute to the larger scope
• Conduct a reality check
• Build friendships
Diversity
• Is a strength
• Is how the world is made up naturally
• Is a pleasant experience
• Is a policy and legal issue
• Is a learnable concept and skill
• Needs a broad and comprehensive definition
• Requires full understanding and attention
• Deserves continuous effort
Resource Generation and Utilization
• Time
• Energy (individual, group)
• Human (office and technical staff, students, mentors, peers, friends, family)
• Financial (allocated, targeted, competitive, gifts)
• Physical/Facility
• Informational
• Organizational
• Political
Faculty Issues vs. Administration Issues
• Faculty Input
• Faculty Participation
• Faculty Advisory
• Faculty Initiation
• Faculty Resolution
• Faculty Governance
• Faculty Committee
• Faculty Meeting
• Resource Allocation
• Resource Management
• Policy, Procedure,
and Rule Enforcement
• Unit Representation
• Faculty/Staff Coordination
Information Source: Department By-laws
Getting Started and Professional Development
• Start as early as you can
• Become familiar with faculty responsibilities, rights, and, career advancement issues
• Get on all key e-mail distribution lists
• Meet all key colleagues as soon as possible
• Although many colleagues will try to “protect”, and very interested in your success as a faculty member, you are ultimately responsible for your own career development
• Keep the big dreams and assess the reality
• Work closely with your mentors
• Remember the importance of professionalism and life-long learning
• Learn how to ask good questions
Questions/Answers and Discussion
? / ! & #*...
…...Thank you!
AUTOMATION: Machine Capabilities of Perception; Reasoning & Learning; Communication; and Task Planning & Execution
Agricultural and Biological Engineering - Automation-Culture-Environment-SYStems (ACESYS) Core Competencies for the Domains of Production of Food, Fiber and Ornamentals; Food Processing, Nutrition, and Food Safety;
Waste Processing, Resource Recovery, and Environmental Stewardship;
Facilities and Infrastructure; Safety and Health; and Enabling Technologies
ENVIRO
NMENT: T
he
Surroundin
gs an
d pro
cess
es
incl
uding A
ir, W
ater
, Soil,
and
contro
lled e
nviro
nmen
t C
ULTU
RE: B
iology of
Plants, Anim
als,
Microorganism
s, and
Hum
an
SYSTEMS: Studies, Analysis, and Integration for overall Technical Workability, Economic Viability, Energy Efficiency, Ecological Harmony, Optimization, and Management
Automation and Culture
Automation and Environment
Culture and Environment
Programs & Activities
Teaching;
Research;
Extension Education;
Service
Overarching Mission: “Bring life to engineering for enhancement of living systems”
April 2005
Core Competencies
Programmatic Sections (i.e. Domains)
(1)Automation:
Machine Capabilities of Perception,Reasoning &
Learning,Communication,Task Planning &
Execution
(2)Culture:
Biology of Plants, Animals, Microorganisms,
Human
(3) Environment:
The Surroundings and Processes
includingAir, Water, Soil,
Controlled Environment
(4) Systems:
Studies, Analysis & Integration for
Overall Technical
Workability,Economic Viability,
Optimization, Management
(5)Implementation:
Technology Transfer,
-Site Testing,Business and
Economic Development
(A) Bioenvironment
alEngineering
(B)Food and BioprocessEngineering
(C)Off-Road
Equipment Engineering
(D)Soil and Water
Resources Engineering
Agricultural and Biological Engineering “Bring life to engineering for enhancement of living systems”
The 3rd dimension:
Teaching (including credit-generating & Extension),
Research, and
Service
Programs
ace
sysTM
Strategic FramingStrategic FramingDevelop a statement containing a strategic foundation:•Purpose (Vision, Mission, and Domains)What are you inspired to be? What do you do best for whom? The issues of disciplinary relevance and impact
•Core Values (Principles)What do you stand for? What are fundamentally and deeply held?
•Overarching Goal (Intentions)What are the long-term (qualitative) accomplishments that you are committed to achieve?
As well as strategic actions in the forms of:•Indicators of Success What are the specific descriptions that make the overarching goals tangible?
•Experiments (Action Plans)What tactics will you take in order to achieve the overarching goal.A tactic includes a specific action, the person who is responsible for the action, and the time to complete.
Related Issues:•Players (parties that you are interacting with)•Context (relationships between the players and you)•Domains (strategic focus areas) K.C. Ting - 2000
ace
sysTM
Things Worthy of Attention:Things Worthy of Attention:
• Quality Work• Being Responsive • Meet the Deadlines• Think Globally, Do Locally• Honesty• Integrity• Team Work (Lead, Follow, Stay Out of the Way, and Cheer) • Be Part of the Solution• Collegiality• Interpersonal Skills• Enable Others to Succeed • We are in the business to “enPower Human Capacity with knowledge and Wisdom (kW).” A GREAT business to be in.
K.C. Ting - 2005
Faculty Appointment,
Performance Evaluation, and Promotion & Tenure Process
K.C. Ting, Ph.D., P.E.
Professor and Head
Agricultural and Biological Engineering Department
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Urbana, Illinois
USA
Contents
• Faculty Appointment
-Search
-Negotiation
-Appointment
• Performance Evaluation
-Purpose
-Documentation
-Criteria
-Performance Standards
-Merit (Performance, Impact, and Equity)
-Procedure
Promotion & Tenure Process
-Documentation
-Process
-Notification
-Related Issues
Faculty Appointment
Search
1. Position Authorization
2. Search Committee (affirmative action representative)
3. Position Description
4. Position Announcement
5. Screening of Applications
6. Identification of “Top” Candidates
7. Interview of Top Candidates
8. Committee Recommendation of Acceptable Candidate(s)
9. Department Chair’s Decision (in Consultation with College Dean)
10. Repeat 4. Through 9. Until the Position is Filled
Faculty Appointment
Negotiation
1. The Ultimate Goal: Enabling a successful professional and personal life for the employee that in turn will lead to a successful organization (i.e. a win-win situation)
2. Package: Type of appointment (9 or 12 month), Rank (and tenure), Appointment lines (general fund, experiment station, and Extension), Location, Salary/Benefits, Start date, Start-up costs, Technical and office support, Office and laboratory space, Support for immigration status, Moving expenses, etc.
3. Start-up costs may include: Operating dollars (cash or annual rate), Summer salary, Graduate student(s), Post-doctoral associate(s), Programmatic technical support, facility renovation, equipment/vehicle, Special space, etc.
4. Maintain professionalism and professional relationship
Faculty Appointment
Appointment
1. Letter of offer
2. Terms of appointment
3. Acceptance of offer
4. Preparation for the new responsibilities
5. Getting a good start with the new position
6. Resource persons
7. Mentoring committee
Performance Evaluation
Purpose
1. Assist faculty in sustaining/improving professional productivity and growth
2. Establish future goals and plans for professional development
3. Document achievement
4. Use as basis for merit-based salary adjustment
Performance Evaluation
Documentation
All Faculty Members –
1. Annual performance report for the last year (may follow Promotion and Tenure core dossier format)
2. Annual expectations summary (i.e. work plan) for the current year (covering Credit Generating Teaching, Outreach Instruction, Research, Service, International Activities, and Professional Development)
3. Supplemental materials
Untenured Faculty Members (additionally) –
1. Cumulative P&T review dossier
Performance Evaluation
Criteria
1. Things that are valued
• High quality professional work
• Relevance to the goals of the Department, College, and University
• Impact of program efforts
• Diversity of scholarly responsibilities and contributions
• Balanced recognition for research, teaching, and outreach efforts
• Disciplinary and multidisciplinary efforts
• Individual and team contributions
• Peer-review – both as validation of accomplishment and as a contribution to development of others Source: College of Food, Agricultural, and
Environmental Sciences, OSU, Faculty Review System Guidelines 2/8/2000
Performance Evaluation
Criteria
2. Scholarly Performance (Boyer, 1994 and Kolb, 1980)
• Discovery – The pursuit of the unknown, the investigative advancement of knowledge
• Integration – The interpretation and synthesis of new insights. Extending the knowledge of original research. Drawing together across disciplines and fitting specialized knowledge into larger intellectual patterns for broader, more comprehensive understanding.
• Transformation – The transformation of an individual or group through the extension and transmission of knowledge. Developing meaning and understanding within the learner.
• Application – The application of knowledge to consequential societal problems. Learning from practice.
Source: College of Food, Agricultural, and Environmental Sciences, OSU, Faculty Review System Guidelines 2/8/2000
Performance Evaluation
Criteria
3. Teaching (both crediting generating and outreach education)
(Measures)
• Mastery of the subject matter
• Continuous growth in subject matter knowledge
• Ability to organize and communicate class material with logic, conviction, and enthusiasm
• Objectivity
• Contributions to curricula or program development
• Creativity in course or program development, methods of presentation and incorporation of new materials and ideas
• Capacity to enhance students’ awareness of the relationship between subjects studied , important problems, and other field of knowledge
• Advising undergraduates, graduate students, and Extension Clientele
• Directing graduate and undergraduate research programs
Source: College of Food, Agricultural, and Environmental Sciences, OSU, Faculty Review System Guidelines 2/8/2000
Performance Evaluation
Criteria
3. Teaching (both crediting generating and outreach education)
(Outputs)
• Students who exit courses or other educational experiences with a high level of competence, as validated by job or advanced study placement or growth in their own life
• Instructional products developed that are adopted by peers
• Pedagogical innovation adopted by peers
• Students who are able to sufficiently perform at a high level of proficiency in subsequent courses and experiences
• Exiting students who are sufficiently enlightened to make life altering decisions and commitments
• Curriculum that is accepted by peers and validated by employers and graduate and professional schools
• Prestigious awards received
Source: College of Food, Agricultural, and Environmental Sciences, OSU, Faculty Review System Guidelines 2/8/2000
Performance Evaluation
Criteria
3. Teaching (additional dimensions for outreach education)
• An understanding of the needs for knowledge by outreach students/clients/users
• The ability to communicate effectively with outreach students
• The ability to anticipate the “teachable moment” regarding the needs of outreach students and to respond with appropriate educational activities
• The development and delivery of outreach educational programs which have a clear set of goals determined through needs assessments and active participation with the target audience
• Changed practices, policies or behavior from outreach education
• The extent to which it enables capacity building for individuals, communities, and institutions
• The development of teaching materials and curriculum
• Extension publications and peer reviewed presentations
• Ability to contribute to team and interdisciplinary efforts
Source: College of Food, Agricultural, and Environmental Sciences, OSU, Faculty Review System Guidelines 2/8/2000
Performance Evaluation
Criteria
4. Research and/or Creative Works (sources of validation)
• Publication in peer-reviewed journals
• Acceptance of peer-reviewed papers and presentations
• Publication of scholarly books
• Publication of peer-reviewed Extension publications
• Awarding of peer-reviewed grants
• Invited presentations
• Patents awarded
• Prestigious awards received
• Other forms of demonstrated scholarly excellence that are less traditional
Source: College of Food, Agricultural, and Environmental Sciences, OSU, Faculty Review System Guidelines 2/8/2000
Performance Evaluation
Criteria
4. Research and/or Creative Works (Additional indication of relevance)
• Relevance of research or scholarly work to the field
• The cutting edge nature of the research or scholarly work in the case of the scholarship of discovery
• Impact measures (who needs and who uses results)
• Productivity and/or efficiency of research and creative works
• Level of risk taking
Source: College of Food, Agricultural, and Environmental Sciences, OSU, Faculty Review System Guidelines 2/8/2000
Performance Evaluation
Criteria
5. Service (Department, College, University, Government, Professional Societies, Community)
• Serving on committees in response to assignments by the Chair, Dean, Provost, or President, and as a result of faculty election
• Serving in supportive administrative roles
• Serving the profession through such activities as service as an officer on the board of a professional organization or journal, and/or participating in organizing a symposium
• Representing the university in service to the non-academic government and community organizations
• Serving in special roles in the community by Extension or other personnel such as with commodity groups, community development groups, youth support groups, etc.
Source: College of Food, Agricultural, and Environmental Sciences, OSU, Faculty Review System Guidelines 2/8/2000
Unit Programs and Functions
Member of the Unit
PerformanceActivities
Teaching
Research
Service
Presence/ Support
Effort Excellence Scholarship/ Impact
Alignment
Increasing Value
Performance Matrix
Programs
Functions
K.C. Ting, June 2005
Performance Evaluation
Merit
1. Performance
2. Impact
3. Equity (internal and external)
Salary Adjustment
1. Across the Board (recurring)
2. Merit Based (recurring)
3. Cash Bonus (one time)
Performance Evaluation
Procedure
1. Call for documentations by department chair/head
2. Submission of documentations by faculty
3. One-on-one face-to-face conference between faculty and chair/head
4. Evaluation comments/letter by chair/head
5. Comments by faculty
6. Salary adjustment and reward decision by chair/head with approval from Dean
7. Salary adjustment
Promotion & Tenure Process
Documentation
1. Dossier (biographical data; documented accomplishments in teaching, research, and service; philosophy in teaching and research; external evaluation letters; internal evaluations and recommendations; etc)
2. Supplemental Materials (publications; awards; recognitions; etc)
Promotion & Tenure Process
Process
1. Department Promotion & Tenure Committee
2. Department Chair/Head
3. College Promotion & Tenure Committee
4. College Dean
5. Campus Promotion & Tenure Committee
6. Provost
7. President and University Board of Trustees
Promotion & Tenure Process
Related Issues
• Annual P&T Review of Untenured Faculty
• Unsuccessful P&T Cases
- Withdrawals
Mandatory (6th year)
Non-Mandatory
- Negative decisions (terminal year)
- Appeals
- Seventh Year Reviews
Questions/Answers and Discussion
? / ! & #*...
…...Thank you!