ABSTRACT

Two-dimensional electrophoretic (2-DE) analysis of differential protein expression is limited by the number of proteins detectable on a single gel. One technological area that directly addresses this limitation is improved sample preparation and protein solubilization. This presentation describes the application of various sample preparation techniques aimed at increasing the protein analytical power of 2-DE. Pressure Cycling Technology (PCT) uses alternating cycles of high and low pressures to induce cell lysis. Tissues placed in specially designed PULSE Tubes were subjected to alternating cycles of maximum (35,000 PSI) and minimum (ambient) pressures in the Barocycler [1]. Mouse liver lysates produced by sonication or with a ground glass tissue grinder were compared to lysates produced by PCT. PDQuest analysis of two-dimensional gels of the PCT lysate revealed 2,126 protein spots compared to 1,832 protein spots in duplicate gels of the tissue grinder lysate. The lysate produced by sonication yielded 1,739 protein spots with a preponderance towards diminished recovery of high molecular weight proteins. This corresponded with a general increase in the spot intensities of low molecular weight proteins suggesting that some protein degradation might be occurring during sonication. (Supported in part by AFOSR Grant F49620-03-1-0089 (FAW))

METHODS

250 mg of fresh, ice-cold saline-perfused mouse and rat liver samples were excised and frozen.

Ground-glass (GG) Homogenization Eight (8) volumes (2 mL) of lysis buffer (9M urea, 4% NP-40, 0.5% ampholytes pH 3-10, 1% DTT) were added to the samples in a 50 mL beaker; the samples were thoroughly minced with surgical scissors [2].Minced liver was transferred to GG tubes for homogenization (at RT).Lysates were stored in microcentrifuge tubes until 2-DE.

Sonication (Son)Eight volumes (2 mL) of lysis buffer (9M urea, 4% NP-40, 1% ampholytes pH 3-10, 1% DTT) were added to the liver sample and sonicated.

Pressure Cycling Technology (PCT)Mouse liver (250 mg) or rat liver samples (250 mg) were placed in specially designed PULSE Tubes (Figure 1) with 1.25 mL of the lysis buffer described above and subjected to alternating cycles of high and low pressures in a pressure-generating instrument (Barocycler Model NEP3229, Figure 2).PULSE Tubes were subjected to 10 pressure cycles; each cycle consisted of 20 seconds at 35,000 PSI followed by 20 seconds at ambient pressure. Following PCT, the lysates were collected and cellular debris was removed by centrifugation at 20,000 RCF for 10 minutes.

2-DEProtein concentration was determined using an Amido black assay 1st dimension = pH 3-10 non-linear, BioRad 24 cm IPG strips, 500 μg loaded onto each strip by passive rehydration2nd dimension = 11-17% polyacrylamide, 20 x 25 x 0.15 cmGels were run in a 20 gel DALT tank to minimize variationGels were stained with colloidal CBB [3], scanned, and analyzed with PDQuest to detect the number of spots for each sample

RESULTS

In the initial experiment, replicate mouse liver samples (n=2) were solubilized as described. PDQuest detected the following in each preparation group (see Figure 3):

PCT 2,126 ± 44Sonication 1,739 ± 178Ground glass 1,832 ± 21

PCT significantly improved protein spot detection over both sonication (22%) and ground glass homogenization (16%). Sonication and GG results did not differ significantly.

Many higher molecular weight proteins were significantly diminished in the sonicated sample (see Figure 4) compared to PCT and GG.

A second experiment compared rat liver sample (n=5) preparation by PCT, GG, GG with sonication, and GG/sonication in twice the lysis buffer volume (16 volumes). PDQuest detected the following in each preparation group (see Figure 5):

PCT 2,280 ± 173 GG 1,620 ± 137 GG/Son 1,735 ± 144

GG/Son/2X 1,682 ± 165

PCT significantly improved protein spot detection over GG (40%), GG/Son (31%), and GG/Son/2X (36%). None of the GG-based preparation methods differed significantly from one another.

Representative gel images of each of these groups are shown in Figure 6.

INTRODUCTION

Two-dimensional electrophoresis (2-DE) is a powerful protein analytical tool whose major strengths include semi-global quantitation and charge separation of complex protein mixtures, enabling the analysis of variable post-translational modification.

One of 2-DE’s limitations relates to its limited dynamic range and consequently the number of proteins expressed that can be analyzed on a single gel.

In an attempt to improve the yield of detectable proteins during sample preparation, we applied a novel extraction technique, Pressure Cycling Technology (PCT). PCT uses alternating cycles of high and low pressures to induce cell lysis.

Our hypothesis contends that tissue samples subjected to PCT in the presence of a suitable lysis buffer will liberate a greater abundance of cellular proteins for subsequent 2-DE and improve the utility of this proteomic approach.

Application of Pressure Cycling Technology (PCT) in Proteomics:Application of Pressure Cycling Technology (PCT) in Proteomics:Increased Yield of High Molecular Weight Proteins in Mouse Liver LysatesIncreased Yield of High Molecular Weight Proteins in Mouse Liver Lysates

Frank WitzmannFrank Witzmann11, Heather Ringham, Heather Ringham11, Gary Smejkal, Gary Smejkal22, James Behnke, James Behnke22

11Department of Cellular & Integrative Physiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, IndianapolisDepartment of Cellular & Integrative Physiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis , IN, USA, IN, USA22Pressure BioSciences, Inc., West Bridgewater, MA, USAPressure BioSciences, Inc., West Bridgewater, MA, USA

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms and extends previous results with E. coli where PCT sample preparation for 2-DE improved protein spot detection by 14.2% compared to standard bead mill treatment [4].

In mouse liver samples, PCT improved overall protein extraction from tissue as indicated by a significantly higher number of protein spots detected by 2-DE.

In rat liver samples, PCT demonstrated an even greater improvement in protein extraction.

To overcome some of 2-DE’s limitations (with respect to sensitivity), it is beneficial to include PCT whole tissue sample preparation protocols.

To better understand the mechanism of PCT’s utility, ongoing experiments are aimed at identifying proteins where relative abundance on 2-DE is selectively enhanced (or decreased) by PCT in lysis buffer.

Additional studies are necessary to optimize the PCT conditions (duration, number of cycles, etc.) for unique tissue and cell culture samples.

Figure 1. PULSE Tubes (PT). Liver samples were placed on the lysis disk in the PT and subjected to 10 pressure cycles in the Barocycler instrument.

The combination of physical passage through the PT lysis disk, rapid pressure changes, and other bio-physical mechanisms effectively induced cell lysis.

Figure 2. The Barocycler NEP3229 bench top instrument used to extract liver samples in this study is capable of processing up to three samples simultaneously.

Sonication PCT Ground Glass

calreticulingrp78

hsc70

PDI

F1 ATPase beta

endoplasmin100

80

60

50

40

MW

(k

Da)

Figure 4. Sections of representative mouse liver (500 μg) gel images (pI range ~4.5-6.5 and MW ~30-100 kDa) illustrating the loss of higher MW proteins with sonication. Overall protein spot detection is significantly higher in PCT prepared samples.

F= 6.167P < 0.005n = 5

Sp

ots

Det

ect

ed

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

PCT GG/Son GG GG/SonVolx2

Comparison P value Significant?

PCT vs. GG/No Son 0.002 YesPCT vs. GG/Son/x2 Vol 0.003 YesPCT vs. GG/Son 0.006 YesGG/Son vs. GG/No Son 0.519 NoGG/Son/x2 Vol vs. GG/No Son 0.728 NoGG/Son vs. GG/Son/x2 Vol 0.764 No

** *

Rat Liver Sample Preparation

Figure 5

Mouse Liver Sample Preparation

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

SonPCT GG

Sp

ots

Det

ect

ed

Comparison P value Significant?

PCT vs. Son 0.03 YesPCT vs. GG 0.02 YesSon vs. GG 0.816 No

t-testn = 2

Figure 3.

**

PCT GG/Son

GG GG/Son vol 2X

Figure 6. Representative rat liver 2D gel images (pI range 3-10 and MW ~5-150 kDa) illustrating colloidal Coomassie blue-stained rat liver samples (500 μg) prepared as labeled. Overall protein spot detection is significantly higher in PCT prepared samples.

REFERENCES

1. Schumacher R.T., M. Manak, P. Garrett, W. Miller, N. Lawrence, and F. Tao. (2002). Automated Solution for Sample Preparation: Nucleic Acid and Protein Extraction From Cells and Tissues Using Pressure Cycling Technology (PCT). Am. Laboratory 34 (16): 38-43.

2. Witzmann, F.A. (2005). Preparation of Mammalian Tissue Samples for Two-dimensional Electrophoresis. In: The Proteomics Protocols Handbook, J.M. Walker, ed., The Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, pp. 31-35.

3. Candiano G., M. Bruschi, L. Musante, L. Santucci, G.M. Ghiggeri, B. Carnemolla, P. Orecchia, L. Zardi & P.G. Righetti. (2004). Blue silver: a very sensitive colloidal Coomassie G-250 staining for proteome analysis. Electrophoresis 25:1327-1333.

4. Smejkal, G.B. M.H. Robinson, N.P. Lawrence, F. Tao, C.A. Saravis, and R.T. Schumacher. (2006). Increased Protein Yields From Escherichia coli Using Pressure Cycling Technology. J. Biomolecular Techniques (in press).