absence as presence: an analysis of schumann’s “im ... · an analysis of schumann’s “im...

13
Lindsay Pope 1 Lindsay Pope MUTH 5360 June 25, 2018 Absence as Presence: An Analysis of Schumann’s “Im wunderschönen Monat Mai” Composed in 1840, Robert Schumann’s Dichterliebe (Opus 48) sets selected poems from Heinrich Heine’s Lyrisches Intermezzo. The first piece, “Im wunderschönen Monat Mai,” establishes an emotional framework for the entire cycle — the exploration of love’s absence. The narrator, who speaks in the first person from the present moment, recounts a past romantic experience (see Example 1): Im wunderschönen Monat Mai, Als alle Knospen sprangen, Da ist in meinem Herzen Die Liebe aufgegangen. Im wunderschönen Monat Mai, Als alle Vögel sangen, Da hab ich ihr gestanden Mein Sehnen und Verlangen. In the wonderfully beautiful month of May, When all the buds were bursting, Then it was in my heart (that) Love rose up. In the wonderfully beautiful month of May, When all the birds sang, Then I confessed to her My yearning and my desire. Example 1. Heinrich Heine, “Im wunderschönen Monat Mai,” Translation. I think that Schumann’s setting of Heine’s poetry reinforces certain aspects of the text, but ultimately alters and adds upon Heine’s content. While Heine’s poem has a repetitive quality — expressed through meter, rhythm, and structure — Schumann’s setting is reiterative. 1 The composer uses repeated motives, harmony, and melody to create a fragmented, circular structure that is ultimately more painful than the poem’s initial meaning. Schumann suggests, through tonal ambiguity and a latent key area, the complete absence of the narrator’s love. I do not feel that this 1 I am using the definitions of “repetitive” and “reiteration” that we received in class. Repetition

Upload: others

Post on 27-Jul-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Absence as Presence: An Analysis of Schumann’s “Im ... · An Analysis of Schumann’s “Im wunderschönen Monat Mai” Composed in 1840, Robert Schumann’s Dichterliebe (Opus

LindsayPope

1

LindsayPopeMUTH5360June25,2018

AbsenceasPresence:AnAnalysisofSchumann’s“ImwunderschönenMonatMai”

Composedin1840,RobertSchumann’sDichterliebe(Opus48)setsselected

poemsfromHeinrichHeine’sLyrischesIntermezzo.Thefirstpiece,“Im

wunderschönenMonatMai,”establishesanemotionalframeworkfortheentire

cycle—theexplorationoflove’sabsence.Thenarrator,whospeaksinthefirst

personfromthepresentmoment,recountsapastromanticexperience(see

Example1):

ImwunderschönenMonatMai,AlsalleKnospensprangen,DaistinmeinemHerzenDieLiebeaufgegangen.ImwunderschönenMonatMai,AlsalleVögelsangen,DahabichihrgestandenMeinSehnenundVerlangen.

InthewonderfullybeautifulmonthofMay,Whenallthebudswerebursting,Thenitwasinmyheart(that)Loveroseup.InthewonderfullybeautifulmonthofMay,Whenallthebirdssang,ThenIconfessedtoherMyyearningandmydesire.

Example1.HeinrichHeine,“ImwunderschönenMonatMai,”Translation.

IthinkthatSchumann’ssettingofHeine’spoetryreinforcescertainaspectsof

thetext,butultimatelyaltersandaddsuponHeine’scontent.WhileHeine’spoem

hasarepetitivequality—expressedthroughmeter,rhythm,andstructure—

Schumann’ssettingisreiterative.1Thecomposerusesrepeatedmotives,harmony,

andmelodytocreateafragmented,circularstructurethatisultimatelymorepainful

thanthepoem’sinitialmeaning.Schumannsuggests,throughtonalambiguityanda

latentkeyarea,thecompleteabsenceofthenarrator’slove.Idonotfeelthatthis

1Iamusingthedefinitionsof“repetitive”and“reiteration”thatwereceivedinclass.Repetition

Page 2: Absence as Presence: An Analysis of Schumann’s “Im ... · An Analysis of Schumann’s “Im wunderschönen Monat Mai” Composed in 1840, Robert Schumann’s Dichterliebe (Opus

LindsayPope

2

absenceisexplicitinthepoemitself.Theaimofthispaperistoexplorethewayin

whichSchumann’ssettingsubtlyexpressesHeine’stextwhilealsocreatingthis

additionallayerofmeaning.

Thepoem,intwoquatrains,isiniambictetrameter(seeExample2).2In

quatrain#1,thefirstlineestablishesarhythmicexpectationoffourcompletefeet

perline;line1endsonthestressedsyllable“Mai.”However,thesecondlineis

incomplete.Thefinalstressedsyllableisnotspoken,butratherisimpliedthrougha

pause.3Onemightthenexpectthemeteroflines1and2torepeatforlines3and4,

withfourcompletefeetinline3and3½feetinline4.Thisstrikesmeasavery

familiarrhymescheme;theregularityoftheversewouldcreateabalanceand

wholenesstothepoem’srhythmicstructure.Heineinsteadoptsforlines3and4to

alsobeincomplete,withimpliedpausesaftertheunstressedsyllables.Thefactthat

therhythmisiambicisnotuncommongiventhelanguage;however,itmeansthat

thepauseisalwaysonastressedsyllable,givingextraweighttothesilence.

Quatrain#1:

Line1Line2Line3Line4

Quatrain#2:

Line5Line6Line7Line8

ImwunderschönenMonatMai,AlsalleKnospensprangen,/DaistinmeinemHerzen/DieLiebeaufgegangen./ImwunderschönenMonatMai,AlsalleVögelsangen,/Dahabichihrgestanden/MeinSehnenundVerlangen./

Endrhyme:abxbabxb

Example2.HeinrichHeine,“ImwunderschönenMonatMai,”

AnalysisofStructure,Meter,andRhyme.

2InExample2,Ihaveindicatedstressedsyllablesthroughboldfontwiththemoststressedsyllableinitalics.Allsyllablesinregularfrontareunstressed.3InExample2,Ihaveinserted“/”whereIfeelthispausetoexistnaturallyinthepoem’srhythm.

Page 3: Absence as Presence: An Analysis of Schumann’s “Im ... · An Analysis of Schumann’s “Im wunderschönen Monat Mai” Composed in 1840, Robert Schumann’s Dichterliebe (Opus

LindsayPope

3

Theextremeasymmetryofthemeterevokesanimbalanceand

incompletenessthatthereaderfeels,andwishestoberectified.Quatrain#2repeats

thesamepattern.Thisrepetitionaddssignificanceasthereaderyearnsfor

conclusion,butstilldoesnotreceiveit.ThistechniqueaffirmsMeyer’stheoryin

music,whichcertainlyalsoappliestopoetry:“…musicarousesexpectations,some

consciousandothersunconscious,whichmayormaynotbedirectlyand

immediatelysatisfied”(Meyer25).Meyerwouldfurtherarguethatthedelayin

gratificationiswhatcreatesthestrongestemotionalreaction.

Bothquatrainsutilizethesamerhymescheme:a-b-x-b.Asopposedtoan

EnglishorItaliansonnetstructure,whichhasabuilt-inconclusion,thisfolk-like

rhymeschemecreatesasenseofcontinuum.Ratherthanthispoemexistingasa

completeidea,therhymeschemeimpliesadropping-in,asifthepoemexisted

beforeitbeganandwillcontinueonafterwespeakit.Thisconceptparallels

Romanticidealsofutilizingfolkartasinspirationfor“high-class”art.The

continuousqualityevokedconnectsthereadertoahigherSource,perhapseternity.

Italsofurtherevokestheyearninginherentinthetext’smeaning.

Bothquatrainscontainthesamemeterandrhymescheme,andalsoimplya

parallelstructure.Theintroductorylinesofeachquatrain,lines1and5,amplifythis

parallelstructure.Theyareareexactreiterations.Bothquatrainsalsosharea

grammaticalframework.Thequestionthenbecomes—evenasHeinecreatesmany

connectionsbetweenthetwoquatrainsintermsofpoeticorganization,howdothey

differ?Ibelievethatthemaindifference,whileobvious,isthesubjectmatter.

Page 4: Absence as Presence: An Analysis of Schumann’s “Im ... · An Analysis of Schumann’s “Im wunderschönen Monat Mai” Composed in 1840, Robert Schumann’s Dichterliebe (Opus

LindsayPope

4

Thepersonalexperienceofthenarratorisextremelydifferentinthefirst

stanzaversusthesecond(seeExample1).Thenarratorusesimagesfromthe

naturalworldtoevokethesecontrastingmoments.Inthefirststanza,thenarrator

comparesthebloomingflowersinMaytothelovethatpowerfullyemergedinhis

heart.Inthesecondstanza,thesingingbirdsinMayareusedtorepresentthe

vocalizationofhislove—theoutwardexpressionofhislongingandhisdesire.In

thefirststanza,thenarratorhasaninternalexperience,andinthesecond,an

externalexperience.Abloomingflowerisamuchquieterimagethanasingingbird.

Thecontrastisinfactshocking,andthereisnothingcircularaboutthisaspectofthe

poem.

Heineisconcernedwiththenarrator’sinnerpsychology,apsychologythatI

believedevelopsoverthecourseofthepoem.Hisinnerdesiremustultimatelyburst

openandbeexpressed.Thepauseswherestressedsyllablesareabsentcouldthen

beinterpretedasanupwardmovingofbreath,aninnerexcitementthatcanno

longerbecontained.Forme,Heine’spoemcreatesatrajectoryfromINSIDEà

OUTSIDE.WhatisnotclearfromHeine’spoemishowtheobjectofhisdesire

responds.Didshereciprocatehislove,ordidsherejecthim?ForHeine’spurposes,I

don’tthinkitmatters.Heineisconcernedonlyfortheexperienceofthenarrator.

Incontrast,Schumann’sinterpretationofthepoemisveryinterestedinhow

theloverresponds.Theentiresettingcentersonadepictionoflove’sabsence.This

isnottheabsencethatHeinedepicts—ayearningforone’slover—butrathera

permanentabsence—alovethatnolongerexists,andhasn’tforawhile.Schumann

impliesthroughhismusicalsettingthatthewomanisnolongerinthenarrator’s

Page 5: Absence as Presence: An Analysis of Schumann’s “Im ... · An Analysis of Schumann’s “Im wunderschönen Monat Mai” Composed in 1840, Robert Schumann’s Dichterliebe (Opus

LindsayPope

5

life.Itisnotcleartomewhetherthewomanisabsentthroughrejection,distance,or

death;butthepermanentabsenceiswhatSchumanncaresmosttoevoke.

BeforeexploringhowSchumanncreatesanadditionalmeaningwithin

Heine’spoem,IwouldliketobrieflytouchuponwaysthatSchumann’ssettingdoes

expressHeine’sintent.Schumannisinterestedinexpressingtheyearning,longing,

anddesirethatthenarratorexpresses.Theseemotionalstatessuggestadistance

betweenthenarratorandhislove.Asdiscussedpreviously,Heinedepictsthis

distancethroughincomplete4-footiambictetrameterinthefinalthreelinesofeach

quatrain.Schumannfurtheremphasizesthisdistancethroughtheaccompaniment,

whichincludesplentifulnon-chordtones,specificallysuspensionsand

diatonic/chromaticneighbors.Theveryfirstnotesoundedinthepiece(pickuptom.

1,seeExample3)introducesa9-8suspensiononbminor-6.Thesecond16thnotein

thelefthandisachromaticleadingtone,anA#thatresolvesimmediatelytoB(7-8).

ThismomentremindsmeoftheintroductiontoSchubert’s“DerLeiermann”—a

briefchromaticmomentinthelefthandthatexpressesa“realityeffect”throughthe

starting-upofthehurdy-gurdy.Similarly,Schumannmaybeevokinga“reality

effect”ofthenarrator’sincompleteness,orthestrugglewithinhissituation.

Example3.RobertSchumann,“ImwunderschönenMonatMai,”m.1-4,Non-chordtones.

Page 6: Absence as Presence: An Analysis of Schumann’s “Im ... · An Analysis of Schumann’s “Im wunderschönen Monat Mai” Composed in 1840, Robert Schumann’s Dichterliebe (Opus

LindsayPope

6

Schumannleadsintom.2withadescendingmotiveintherighthandonG#-

F#-E#.TheG#whichcouldbeheardasanon-chordtone,orasuggestedharmony

(g#half-diminishedseventh)thatisnotresolved.(Iwilldiscussthismomentarily.)

Inm.2,another7-8soundsonbeat1inthelefthand.Attheendofthemeasure,

diatonicneighbortonesresolvetoaC#.ThisC#isthencarriedoverthebarlineto

becomeanother9-8suspensioninb.Thepatternrepeats.

Tome,thisintroductorypattern,whichisrepeatedasaninterlude(m.12-

15)andapostlude(m.23-26),expressesHeine’simagesofboththebursting

flowersandthesingingbirds.Theupwardarpeggiationofthelefthandrepresents

theflowersopening,whiletherighthandsuspensionfollowedbythedescending3-

notefigureatattheendofthebarrepresentsabirdcall.Thenon-chordtonesin

bothpartsevoketheyearningofthenarratorthatisexpressedthroughthese

images.(Theseare“emo”flowersandbirds.)Theseaccompanimentalexpressions

arepivotalmomentsthatnotonlyevoketheimagesthemselves,butinSchumann’s

mind,howtheseimagesrepresentlove’sabsence.Theflowers’andbirds’presence

remindthenarratorofwhathedoesnothave.Schumannachievesthis

compositionallythroughbothtonalambiguityandthesuggestionoflatent

harmoniesthatareneverabletosound.

Inthefirstfourbarsofthepiece,thelistenerhearstwochordsrepeatedina

2+2phrasestructure:bminorinfirstinversionfollowedbyC#Majordominant

seventh.Throughthisprogression,Schumanncreatescertainharmonic

expectationsthatintentionallyconfusethelistener.First,theG#attheendofm.1

thatsoundsoverthebminorchordsuddenlysuggestsag#half-diminishedseventh

Page 7: Absence as Presence: An Analysis of Schumann’s “Im ... · An Analysis of Schumann’s “Im wunderschönen Monat Mai” Composed in 1840, Robert Schumann’s Dichterliebe (Opus

LindsayPope

7

chordthatonemightexpecttoresolvetoAMajor(seeExample3).Giventhekey

signatureofthepiece,thisseemsquitepossible.However,Schumanndoesn’tgo

there.Rather,theG#foreshadowsthefifthscaledegreeofC#Major-7.TheC#7

chordthensuggestsaneventualresolutiontof#minor.Schumanndoesn’tgothere

either.Instead,heshiftsbacktobminor,andthepatternrepeats.Atthismoment,it

isnotclearwhetherSchumannwishesthelistenertohearthepieceisAMajororf#

minor.Theambiguityevokesthenarrator’sinnerturmoil.Therepetitionsuggests

theincessantrememberingofhislove’sabsence.

Atthebeginningofboththefirstandsecondverses,Schumanndoesresolve

toAMajor(m.6andm.17)asthenarratorsingstheintroductoryremark,“Inthe

wonderfullybeautifulmonthofMay.”Itisthefirstcadentialmomentinthepiece.I

thinkthisshiftinmodalitytoAMajorrepresentsboththebeautyofMayaswellasa

timewhenthenarratorwashappy.However,eventhisAMajorisobtrudedbya4-3

suspensioninaninnervoice(seeExample4).Whileonthesurfacethenarratorwas

happyatthismoment,underneaththismemoryhisangstremains.The4-3

suspensionalsosuggeststhatperhapsAMajorisnotthepiece’stonalcenter,as

thereisneveramomentwherewefullyresolvethere.Infact,Schumannavoids

resolutionwitha4-3-5movementthatresultsinanopen5thonbeat2ofthe

measure(seeExample4).

Page 8: Absence as Presence: An Analysis of Schumann’s “Im ... · An Analysis of Schumann’s “Im wunderschönen Monat Mai” Composed in 1840, Robert Schumann’s Dichterliebe (Opus

LindsayPope

8

Example4.RobertSchumann,“ImwunderschönenMonatMai,”m.5-6.

Theclearestindicatortomethatthepieceisinf#minor—asonoritythat

neversounds,bytheway—aretheconsistentC#7chordsthatframethework.The

mosttellingofthesemomentsisthefinalmeasure(m.26),forwhichSchumann

placesthefinalfermataontheseventhscaledegreeofC#Major(seeExample5).

Theseventhscaledegreelingersonandfurtherpronouncesthenarrator’slonging

to“resolve.”Itisthroughthestrongsuggestionoff#minorbutultimatelyits

absencefromthepiecethatSchumannexpressestheabsenceofthenarrator’slove.

Example5.RobertSchumann,“ImwunderschönenMonatMai,”m.25-26.

Page 9: Absence as Presence: An Analysis of Schumann’s “Im ... · An Analysis of Schumann’s “Im wunderschönen Monat Mai” Composed in 1840, Robert Schumann’s Dichterliebe (Opus

LindsayPope

9

WhileIhavenowestablishedthatthepieceisinf#minor,Schumannalso

explorestonicizationsinotherkeyareasforhissettingofthesecondhalfofeach

quatrain.(Forsimplicity,IwillrefertoVerse1measurenumbers,knowingthat

thesemomentsarealsoapplicableforVerse2).Afterthealmost-resolutiontoA

Majorinm.5-8,Schumannsuddenlyshiftstoatonicizationofbminorfollowedbya

tonicizationinDMajor(seeExample6).Thesecadentialpatternsactuallyechothe

introduction—iv-V7movementintherespectivekeyarea—andprovidefurther

claritythatultimatelythepieceisinf#minor(animplication-realizationmoment!).

ThedifferencebetweenthesecadencesandtheintroductionisthatSchumann

actuallyallowsthesecadencestoresolve.Tome,thesequenceoftonalareas

exploredthroughtheverses—AMajortobminortoDMajor—suggestsan

expressivetonality.Theriseofthekeyareascreatesasenseofanticipationthat

echoesthetext’ssentiment:“Thenitwasinmyheart(that)loveroseup.”

Prelude(m.1-4)

m.1 m.2 m.3 m.4b6 C#7 b6 C#7f#:iv V7 iv V72 2

Verse1(m.5-12)&Verse2(m.16-23)m.5m.16

m.6m.17

m.7m.18

m.8m.19

m.9m.20

m.10m.21

m.11m.22

m.12m.23

b6–E7 A b6–E7 A e6–F#7 b g-A7 D--bf#:iv6-V7/IIIA:ii6-V7

IIII

A:ii6-V7 I b:iv-V7 i D:iv-V7

I–vi

4(2+2) 4(2+2)

• DifferencesbetweenVerses1&2:Longercrescendoinm.22(comparewithm.11)

Page 10: Absence as Presence: An Analysis of Schumann’s “Im ... · An Analysis of Schumann’s “Im wunderschönen Monat Mai” Composed in 1840, Robert Schumann’s Dichterliebe (Opus

LindsayPope

10

Interlude(m.12-15)&Postlude(m.23-26)m.12m.23

m.13m.24

m.14m.25

m.15m.26

D-b C#7 b C#7f#:VI-iv V iv V2 2

• DifferencesbetweenInterlude&Postlude:ritardandoinm.24,fermatasinm.26Example6.RobertSchumann,“ImwunderschönenMonatMai,”

Harmonic,RomanNumeral,andPhraseAnalysis. Throughouttheserisingtonicizations,IfindSchumann’ssettingoftheb

minorchordinm.10fascinating(seeExample7).Notonlydoesitincludechromatic

movementinthearpeggiationwith#4-5followed7-8,buttheuppergnaturalat

theendofthemeasurestrikestheearasunusualaftertheestablishedG#’soverab

minorchordintheintroduction.Schumannisusingthegnaturaltoforeshadowthe

gminorinfirstinversiontofollow.ButSchumannalsousesthegnaturaltocontrast

thestepwiseascenttog#inm.12.Thegnaturalmakestheg#thatfollowsmore

significant,andbringsoutthereturntomusicalmaterialtofurtheremphasizethe

music’scircularity.ThiscircularityisfurtheremphasizedbySchumann’sexact

reiterationofthemusicfromVerse1toVerse2(seeExample6).

Example7.RobertSchumann,“ImwunderschönenMonatMai,”m.9-12.

Page 11: Absence as Presence: An Analysis of Schumann’s “Im ... · An Analysis of Schumann’s “Im wunderschönen Monat Mai” Composed in 1840, Robert Schumann’s Dichterliebe (Opus

LindsayPope

11

Therepeatofmusicforbothversesofpoetryseemsnaturalgiventheparallel

structureofthepoem.Myquestionthenbecomes,doesSchumannacknowledgethe

differenceinsubjectmatterbetweenthetwoverses?Doesheexpresstheshiftfrom

inwardtooutwardthatthenarratornaturallyportrays?Theanswerisyes,butina

waythatwouldbebarelyrecognizableunlessthesingeremphasizedit.Thesingle

differenceIcouldfindbetweenthetwoversesisinthelengthofthecrescendoinm.

11versusthecomplementarymusicinm.22(compareExample7withExample8).

Theriseofthevocallineinmeasures9,11,and20isaccompaniedbyacrescendo

onthesecondhalfofthemeasure.Incontrast,Schumannwritesacrescendoover

theentiretyofmeasure22.Ithinkthisalternativeexpressivemarkingispivotal.Itis

theonlywaythatSchumannacknowledgestheshiftinexpressionbetweenHeine’s

twoquatrains.Thelongcrescendonaturallyevincesthenarrator’s“longingand

desire.”Withoutacknowledgementofthiscrescendo,Schumanntrulyisexpressing

solelyacircular,fragmenteddepictionofthenarrator’swoes.

Example8.RobertSchumann,“ImwunderschönenMonatMai,”m.21-22.

ThereiscertainlyayearningthatisinnateinHeine’spoem,andSchumann

takesthisyearningtoanotheremotionallevelinhismusicalsetting.WhileHeine’s

poemhasaparallelstructure,thesubjectmatterportraysfirstaninnerthanan

Page 12: Absence as Presence: An Analysis of Schumann’s “Im ... · An Analysis of Schumann’s “Im wunderschönen Monat Mai” Composed in 1840, Robert Schumann’s Dichterliebe (Opus

LindsayPope

12

outwardperspective.WhileHeine’spoemisrepetitive,Schumann’ssetting,withthe

exceptionofalonecrescendo,isreiterative.Schumannsetsamonotonous

experience—aworldinwhichthemalesuitorrecountsoverandoverhislovefor

andprofessionofloveforthiswoman.Thiscirculardepictionisnotdeveloping

somewhere;itremindsmeofsomeonewhoisrepeatedlyhittingtheirheadagainst

thewall.Itisreiterativelypainfulanddepressing.

WhileSchumannisclearlya19thcenturyRomanticcomposer,hissettingof

“ImwunderschönenMonatMai”suggestsalooseningofsubordinatemusical

principles,andaforeshadowingofbi-tonal,coordinativestructures.Thereiterative

qualityofthisworksoundsalmostlikeapre-cursortoJohnAdams’minimalism.The

nuanceddifferencesbetweenHeine’spoemandSchumann’ssettingmightdepicta

shiftinpsychologythatwasoccurringthroughoutthe19thcentury;ashiftthat

ultimatelyledtomusic’sre-structuring.

Page 13: Absence as Presence: An Analysis of Schumann’s “Im ... · An Analysis of Schumann’s “Im wunderschönen Monat Mai” Composed in 1840, Robert Schumann’s Dichterliebe (Opus

LindsayPope

13

WorksCited

Meyer,Leonard.(1956)EmotionandMeaninginMusic.Chicago:UniversityofChicagoPress.