abenomics in the second stage ~challenges for the long-term … · 2019-02-06 · abenomics in the...
TRANSCRIPT
Abenomics in the Second Stage
~Challenges for the Long-term Growth and
Fiscal Consolidation
March 2016
Kenta Ichikawa
Ministry of Finance, Japan
600 tril yen
Economy
Disclaimer
The views expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect
the opinions of the organizations to which the author belongs.
-2.5
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
(%, change from the previous year)
(CY)(Note) The effects of consumer tax rate change in April 2014 on CPI are eliminated.(Source) MOF, Cabinet Office, Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, BOJ
527
499
503
519
538
525
527
544
460
470
480
490
500
510
520
530
540
550
ⅠⅡⅢⅣⅠⅡⅢⅣⅠⅡⅢⅣⅠⅡⅢⅣⅠⅡⅢⅣ
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
(trillion yen)
(CY)
Mar. 2011
The Great East Japan
Earthquake
Abenomics
Real GDP
Real GNI Nominal GNI
Nominal GDP
Abenomics is strengthening Japan’s “earning power” in the global market, and Japan is getting out of deflation.
(Source) Cabinet Office, Government of Japan "Quarterly Estimates of GDP", "Fiscal 2016 Economic Outlook (Dec, 2015)" 2
Abenomics
1.1
0.0
2.5
1.6
0.8 0.8
-2.3
(Source) Bloomberg
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
18,000
20,000
22,000
Jan
-11
May
-11
Sep
-11
Jan
-12
May
-12
Sep
-12
Jan
-13
May
-13
Sep
-13
Jan
-14
May
-14
Sep
-14
Jan
-15
May
-15
Sep
-15
Jan
-16
Nikkei Stock Average (LHS)
USD/JPY (RHS)
(yen) (dollar/yen)
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
230
235
240
245
250
255
260
265
270
08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15
Real Compensation of Emplyees
Nominal Compensation of Employees
Job Opening-to-Application Ratio (RHS)
(Seasonally adjusted、
trillion yen)
(CY)
Employment and Wage (ratio)
Market may fluctuate, but economic fundamentals are solid. Good cycles are developing in the economy.
3 (Source) Ministry of Finance, Cabinet Office, Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare
(Note) The figures of “Corporate Earnings” exclude financial and insurance industry.
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
百万
Corporate Earnings(trillion yen, seasonally adjusted)
(CY)
All industry
Non-manufacturer
Manufacturer
-15.0
-10.0
-5.0
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ
11 12 13 14 15
Capital Investment (excl. softweare)
(CY)
(%, change from the previous year)
100
105
110
115
1 4 7 10 1 4 7 10 1 4 7 10 1 4 7 10 1 4 7 10
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Consumption
Private Consumption Integrated
Estimates (seasonally adjusted
series)
(CY2005=100)
Consumption Tax Hike
5% → 8%
Consumption Tax Hike(apporoved by the Diet)
40.75
37.00
33.33
29.97(2016)→29.74(2018) 29.72
25.00 24.20
20.0017.00
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
U.S. France Germany China Korea U.K. Singapore
(%)
34.62(2014)
32.11(2015)
Growth Strategy continues evolution.
4
Immigration
Special economic zones
(SEZs)
Agriculture
Energy
Tax reform
Womenomics
A
B+
B
C
Corporate governance
Labour reform
A
B
C
D
Grade
“Abe Scorecard”
(Sep 10, 2015 Financial Times p.6) Economic effect boosting up GDP by 2.6% (13.6 trill yen)
(Projection by Cabinet Secretariat)
① Successful Agreement of TPP negotiation Oct 5, 2015
② FY2016 Tax Reform Bill reduced Corporate Tax Rate Dec 24, 2015 (cabinet decision)
③ Employment Insurance Reform Bill Jan 29, 2016 (cabinet decision)
・Expand the coverage to non-regular workers (Oct 2016-)
・Decrease the insurance premium rate (1.0%→0.8%)
・Expand child care and long-term care leaves
→ Further discussion on labor market reform
Japan
Progress after Scorecard
Abenomics’ initiatives in “Labor participation”, “Support for working generation” and “Distribution” should effectively address structural bottlenecks, and strengthen Japan’s growth potential.
5
Positive Cycle of Growth and Distribution
GDP 600 trillion yen by 2020
・・・ 6.55 mil seeking job 2.95 mil want longer working hour
Creating Market for Age-related
Demand (utilizing idle property)
Privatization of Public Welfare
Service
Promotion of Global Marketing (regional tourism resources, healthy
and long life service)
Labor Participation and Human
Resource Development (removal of tax / insurance disincentives,
expanding child care and long-term care
support, retirement age)
Structural Reform (corporate governance reform)
Capital Investment, R&D (supporting innovation, enhancing
inward investment)
Improvement of Disposable Income
(wage negotiation, minimum wage (+3%/yr), employment
insurance)
Establishing “Equal Pay for Equal Work”
Continued Policy Support for Working Generation
child care, education birthrate 1.8
long-term care no one is forced to quit his/her job
Demand Side Supply Side
Income / Distribution
New Three Arrows (Targets) Sep.2015
① GDP 600 tril yen
② birthrate 1.8
③ no quitting job for long-
term care of parents
-16.0
-12.0
-8.0
-4.0
0.0
4.0
2001 2006 2011 2016
(%)
Japan
U.S.
U.K. France
Italy
Canada
Germany
6
Fiscal balance is improving, but Debt to GDP is yet to be stabilized. Japan aims at Primary Surplus by 2020.
6 (Source) OECD “Economic Outlook 98”(November 2015)
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
210
240
2001 2006 2011 2016
(%)
Japan
Italy
France U.K.
U.S.
Canada
Germany
Expenditures Tax
Revenues,
etc.
Debt Service
23.6
73.1
Other
Expenditures
Primary
Deficit
62.3
10.8
Fiscal Balance Debt to GDP
(FY2016 Budget)
tril yen
-6.6 -5.8
-4.1
-3.3-2.9 -2.3
-2.1 -2.2 -2.3
-2.2 -1.7 -1.4
-1.1
-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
-3.3
Primary Surplus Target
-12.4 trillion Yen
●
Benchmark : approx. -1%●
●:Economic Revitalization Case (Nominal: more than 3%, Real: more than 2%)
●:Baseline Case (Nominal: mid 1%, Real: less than 1%)
●
-6.5 trillion Yen
(FY)
(ratio to nominal GDP:%)
Japan has successfully halved the deficit by 2015. In coming years, however, growth alone is not enough.
(Note) Excluding the expenditures and fiscal resources for the recovery and reconstruction measures.
(Source) Cabinet Office 7
2010 2015 2020
Primary Balance of the Central
and Local governments
(Source) Cabinet Decision: Basic Policy on Economic and Fiscal Management and Reform (June 2015)
The Economic and Fiscal Revitalization Plan (2016 to 2020) (1) pursues realizing “Economic Revitalization Case”, and (2) implements fiscal measures below to achieve FY2020 Primary Surplus Target.
8 8
The government continues current pace of tight expenditure control in coming three years. (Total increase by FY2018 (real terms) is limited to 1.6 trillion yen, including 1.5 trillion yen for social security expenditures.)
Thorough reform will be implemented on social security programs and other expenditures according to Reform Timetable and Key Performance Indicators.
Progress toward primary surplus target of FY2020 will be reviewed at the
mid-point FY2018*. The government will consider to take, if necessary, additional measures on expenditure and/or revenue sides.
growth
expenditure
control
*High growth scenario and planned expenditure control together is expected to reduce the
primary deficit to around -1% in FY2018.
FY2016 Budget fully satisfies limits and conditions of the Plan.
Government continues careful debt management, and steadily advances fiscal consolidation according to “Economic and Fiscal Revitalization Plan”.
(The end of Sep 2015)
Insurance
and Pension
etc. 28.4% Banks etc.
28.4%
Bank of
Japan 30.3%
Household
1.4%
Foreigners 9.8%
General
Government
(ex Public
Pensions)
1.7%
Total \1,040 trillion
(≒$8.6 trillion)
JGB Shareholders
(Source) Bank of Japan, Bloomberg 9
-0.3
-0.2
-0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
2014/10 2015/04 2015/10
10Y
5Y
2Y
(%)2014/12/1Aa3 → A1
(Moody's)
2015/9/16AA- → A+
(S&P)
2015/4/27A+ → A
(Fitch)
Negative Interest Rate
QQE2
Summary
10
Japan is getting out of deflation. Positive cycles of
“corporate earnings - investment” and “household income
– consumption” are developing.
Abe government is decisively propelling growth strategy,
including all needed structural reforms and social welfare
program reviews to improve Japan’s potential growth.
There is a good progress in fiscal consolidation. Reliable
plan is set, and steady implementation started.
The Golden Goose • Nutrition(capital)
• Exercise(structural reform)
• Discipline(fiscal consolidation)
(blank page)
Appendix
Background of Abenomics
13
FY2010
- 6.6%
FY2015
Cut 1/2 (- 3.3%)
FY2020
PB Surplus
Primary Balance / GDP Target Deflation
Nominal
GDP Growth Rate
- 1.3%
CPI
- 0.6%
Abenomics Three Arrows
Tax Revenues*
0.1%
(Average of 2009-2012)
*FY base
Bold monetary policy
→Joint statement with BOJ
→Price stability target
(inflation target(2%))
→Quantitative Qualitative
Easing (QQE)
Flexible fiscal policy →FY2012 supplementary
budget (10 trillion yen)
Growth strategy
→private consumption and
investment promotion
→structural reform
Achievement of Abenomics
14
Nominal GNI 488 trillion yen (FY2012, 4Q) → 525 trillion yen (FY2015, 4Q) Corporate Earnings 64.6 trillion yen (FY2014, record high)
Labor Market Job Opening-to-Application Ratio: 1.28 (Jan. 2016, highest in 24 years) Unemployment Rate: 3.2% (Jan. 2016) Wage Increase: 2.20% (2015, highest in 17 years)
Outward Direct Investment 94.0 trillion yen (2012) → 159.9 trillion yen (2014) Net External Assets 3.0 trillion dollars (2014, the best in the world)
Foreign Currency Reserve 1.2 trillion dollars (2014, 2nd in the world)
Inbound Tourists Number of tourists: 19.74 million (2015, record high) Expenditures by tourists: 3.4 trillion yen (2015, record high)
Agriculture Exports : 611.7 billion yen (2014, record high)
Energy Effectiveness Energy Consumption (manufacturer): 43% improvement (FY1973-2012) Expansion overseas of Japanese Companies 68,573 (Oct. 1, 2014, record high)
Women in Business More than one million increase (during Abe Administration) Proportion of women in management position: 6.9% (2012) → 8.3% (2014) Economic Effect of Tokyo Olympic 2020 Boost up real GDP growth by 0.2 - 0.3% annually (FY2015-2018) Increase in Tax Revenues 57.6 trillion yen (FY2016) (+ 13.7 trillion yen since Abe Cabinet started)
(Source) Cabinet Office, Bank of Japan
Society in which All Citizens are Dynamically Engaged (Abenomics’ new “Three Arrows”)
15 (Source) Cabinet Office
The 1st Arrow “A robust economy that gives rise to hope” Nominal GDP toward 600 trillion yen
• Increase in labor share by raising wages
• Expansion of private investment through revolution in productivity
• Increase in the labor participation rate through working-style reforms and improvement
in productivity through innovation
The 2nd Arrow “Dream-weaving Childcare Supports” Desirable birthrate of 1.8
• Stabilization of youth employment and improvement in working conditions
• An environment enabling balance of working with childcare
• Ceaseless supports in each stage from marriage, pregnancy, childbirth to childcare
including childcare services
The 3rd Arrow “Social Security that provides reassurance No one forced to leave their jobs for nursing care
• Securement of nursing services
• An environment enabling balance of working with nursing
• Consulting and supporting systems for families
• Extension of healthy life expectancy
Put a brake on the declining birthrate and aging population, and
maintain the population at 100 million people 50 years from now
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
19
90
19
91
19
92
19
93
19
94
19
95
19
96
19
97
19
98
19
99
20
00
20
01
20
02
20
03
20
04
20
05
20
06
20
07
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
11
20
12
20
13
20
14
20
15
20
16
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
Real GDP Growth (left) Total Expenditure (right)
Tax Revenues (right) CPI (less fresh food, left)
(%, YoY)
(Source) Cabinet Office、Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications、Minisry of Finance
(trillion yen)
Crocodile Mouth is Closing
16
17
Projection of Social Security Benefit
(Source) Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare
Pension
53.8 trillion yen
Medical care
35.1 trillion yen
Long-term care 8.4 trillion yen
Others 12.2 trillion yen
Pension
60.4 trillion yen
Medical Care
54.0 trillion yen
Long-term care
19.8 trillion yen
Others 14.6 trillion yen
GDP 479.6 trillion yen
(FY2012)
Pension
1.12 times
Medical care
1.54 times
Long-term care
2.34 times
Total benefits
1.36 times
109.5 trillion yen
GDP 610.6 trillion yen
(FY2025) GDP 1.27 times
148.9 trillion yen
Size of Government (OECD)
18
(as of FY2011)
(Source) OECD, EU, Cabinet Office
(expenditures and revenues are general government base)
(Some countries’ data are not released by OECD)
(as of FY2012)
Rate to GDP (%)Rank in
OECD members
Social Security
Expenditures25.3
11
29
Other
Expenditures14.8
29
29
Tax Revenues 16.8 32
34
【Reference】
Tax and Social Security
Contributions Ratio*
(Rate to NI)40.5
27
33
*Total taxes as a percentage of National Income (NI)
+ Social Security Contribution as a percentage of NI
19 (Source) Ministry of Finance
Expenditure
Expansion
Revenue
Decreasing
Contribution to Expenditure Expansion and Revenue Decreasing (FY1990=0)
Highlights of the Draft Budget for FY2016
20
Steady growth is expected
Real GDP growth rate: FY2016: 1.7%
→largely in line with the medium-term outlook
Increase in tax revenues
57.6 trillion yen (+ 13.7 trillion yen since Abe Cabinet started)
→exceeds the level of tax revenues before Lehman Shock (increase for 7 years in a row)
Adhering to Strict Expenditure Control
FY2016 budget limited expenditure increase to 530 billion yen (including social security
expenditure increase to 500 billion yen) by optimization of drug prices and other reforms
Reduction of the amount of newly issued government bonds
Newly issued government bonds: 34.4 trillion yen (- 2.4 trillion yen from the previous year)
→Reduction for 6 years in a row
Bond dependency ratio: 35.6%
→the lowest level after FY2008 (decrease for 6 years in a row)
Decline in Primary Deficit (not including local governments)
-10.8 trillion yen (+2.6 trillion yen from the previous fiscal year)
(Source) Ministry of Finance
21
Long-Term Fiscal Sustainability Analysis in Japan (Updated Edition)
Conducted long-term projections of Japan’s fiscal position toward FY2060 adopting the analysis method of European Commission, and found…
Fiscal System Council (Oct. 9, 2015)
Primary Balance gets worse after FY2021 and Gross Debt to GDP also increases and diverges due to
the increase of “the age-related expenditure” and etc., in case fiscal condition is not improved (no-
policy-change).
Continuing current pace of expenditure control (+1.6 tril yen / 3yrs) until FY2020 will eliminate the most
of PB deficit.
On top of this, necessary fiscal balance improvement for stabilizing Gross Debt to GDP ratio on and
after FY2060 is calculated as 5.6 - 7.3% of GDP (in case it is improved at a stroke in FY2020)
(including 2.7 - 2.9% of GDP for reducing PB deficit and covering expenditure increase for population
aging).
Consumption Tax
22
Purpose of the revenue resources:Social Security Expenditure
(pension, medical, Long-term care, child care)
Introduce multiple tax rate system in April, 2017
8%:①food and drinks excluding alcohol and those served at restaurants
②newspaper subscription fee
10%:other goods and services
For the necessary revenue of the reduced tax rate, tax reform bill
provides the following. ①Stable and permanent fiscal sources will be secured
②Further review will be made on consumption tax system and social security reform
based on the interim evaluation of the fiscal consolidation plan in FY2018
Raise the consumption tax rate from 8% to 10% on Apr. 1, 2017
Economic Situations (Impact of Last Consumption Tax Hike)
23 (Source) Cabinet Office
2012
3Q 4Q
2013
1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q
2014
1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q
2015
1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q
Private
Consumption
(%) -0.4 +0.2 +0.7 +0.9 +0.3 +0.1 +2.3 -5.0 -0.0 +0.6 +0.2 -0.8 +0.4 -0.8
Real GDP
Growth
(%) -0.5 -0.1 +1.0 +0.7 +0.5 -0.1 +1.2 -2.0 -0.6 +0.6 +1.0 -0.3 +0.3 -0.4
Consumption Tax Hike 5%8% (Change from the previous quarter, seasonally adjusted)
FY2014 FY2017
Interval 17 years
(FY1997~FY2014)
3 years
(FY2014~FY2017)
Tax Rate 5% → 8%
(+ 8.1 trillion yen)
8% → 10%
(+ 5.4 trillion yen)
Others ー Introduction of Reduced Tax Rates
(-1.0 trillion yen)
【Comparison of Consumption Tax Increase】
Consumption Tax Hike (approved by the Diet)
International Comparison of VAT
(Note1) Japan: national consumption tax rate of 6.3% and local consumption tax rate of 1.7%
(Note2) Canada: Provincial Sales Tax (PST) etc. are added to Goods and Services Tax (GST) in almost all states. e.g.; 8% in Ontario State
(Note3) U.S.: Sales Tax is imposed by each state, county, and city. e.g.; 8.875%in total of NY State and NY city
(Source) Ministry of Finance
27
25 25 25 2524 24 24
23 23 23 2322 22
21 21 21 21 21 2120 20 20 20 20 20
19 19 1918 18 18
17 1716
15
1312
10 10 108.875
8 87 7
5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Hungary
Denm
ark
Sw
eden
Cro
atia
Norw
ay
Fin
land
Rom
ania
Icela
nd
Gre
ece
Irela
nd
Pola
nd
Port
ugal
Italy
Slo
venia
Belg
ium
Czech R
epublic
Neth
erlands
Spain
Latv
ia
Lithuania
Austr
ia
Esto
nia
Fra
nce
Slo
vakia
United K
ingdom
Bulg
aria
Germ
any
Cypru
s
Chile
Malta
Isra
el
Turk
ey
Luxem
bourg
Chin
a
Mexic
o
New
Zeala
nd
Canada(O
nta
rio)
Phili
ppin
es
Austr
alia
Republic
of K
ore
a
Indonesia
U.S
.(N
Y)
Japan
Sw
itzerland
Sin
gapore
Thaila
nd
Taiw
an
(%)
24
BOJ’s QQE with Negative Interest Rate
25
(Source) Bank of Japan
※To support firms’ investment in physical and human capital.
BOJ will start selling stocks 0.3 trillion yen per year from FY2016
simultaneously.
○ JGB Market Impact
BOJ’s share 26.5% (Mar, 2015)→28.5% (Jun, 2015)→30.3% (Sep, 2015)
+0.1% same
as current interest
− Average
outstanding balance
of excess reserves
from Jan. to Dec.
2015
− A-(B+C)
‒ Outstanding of required reserves
‒ Outstanding of the BOJ‘s provision of
credit through the “Loan Support
Program” and the “Funds-Supplying
Operation”
− Outstanding balance calculated as a
certain ratio of (C)
Policy-Rate
Balance
Macro
Add-on Balance (B)
-0.1%
0%
Basic Balance
(C)
<23 tril yen>
<24 tril yen>
<206 tril yen>
< > : Test calculated amounts for January current account outstanding
(Source) Bank of Japan
Annual Pace of Increase Negative Interest Rate
QQE
(Apr.4 2013-)
About 60-70
About 50
(Average
maturity of
JGB
purchases)
About 7 yearsAbout 7-
10 years
About 1
About 0.03
-
Eligible
for
purchase
ETF About 3
J-REIT About 0.09
JPX-Nikkei
Index 400
(ETF)
About 0.3 ※
(from FY2016)
Long-term
BondsAbout 80
About 7-12 years
(from CY2016)
Expansion of QQE
(Oct.31 2014-)
Supplementary
Measures for QQE
(Dec.18 2015-)
Monetary
baseAbout 80
(trillion yen)
Overview of Primary JGB Market
Total
Issuance
162.2 trillion yen
FILP Bonds FILP
16.5 trillion yen
Budget Newly Issued Bonds
Refunding Bonds
34.4 trillion yen
109.1 trillion yen
Construction Bonds 6.1tril.
Special Deficit-
financing Bonds 28.4tril.
Breakdown by
Legal Grounds
Coupon-bearing
Bonds
T-Bill
129.2 trillion yen
33.0 trillion yen
40Y Bond 2.4 tril.
30Y Bond 9.6 tril.
20Y Bond 13.2tril.
10Y Bond 28.8tril.
5Y Bond 28.8tril.
2Y Bond 27.6tril.
For Retail
Investors 2.0tril.
etc.
Reconstruction
Bonds
2.2 trillion yen
General Bonds
(注)計数は27年度当初予算ベース
※ Refunding Bonds are issued so that redemption is completed in
60 years with regard to Construction Bonds and Special Deficit-
financing Bonds.
145.7 trillion yen
26
※
Breakdown by
Issuance Type
(Source) Ministry of Finance
(FY2016)
Outstanding Amount of JGBs
27 (Source) Ministry of Finance
12.9 75.2
187.4 236.9 224.9 238.3 246.3 248.3 249.9 260.1 270.3 274.9
2.1
59.2
107.8
304.5 321.0 355.6
390.0 410.9 442.2
471.6 500.8
529.3 551.0
10.7
10.3 9.0
8.3
7.8
7.6 2.6
5.2
4.9
4.6 4.4
139.8 131.1
122.2
118.2110.9
109.3
104.299.0
96.893.8
15.0
134.4
295.2
681.2 677.0 716.2
754.5
780.8 814.3
848.1 873.1
908.9 931.6
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1,000
1975 1985 1998 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016(at the end of FY)
FILP BondsSpecial Bonds for covering Public Pension FundingReconstruction BondsSpecial Deficit-Financing BondsConstruction Bonds
(Note1) Figures may not sum up to total because of rounding.(Note2) Up to FY2014: Actual figures, FY2015 - FY2016: Estimates(Note3) Special Deficit-Financing Bonds include the Refunding Bonds which were issued as a result of takeover of the debt transferred from other accounts.
(trillion yen)
774.1
743.9705.0
669.9636.3
594.0545.9
General Bonds837.8
541.5
812.1
258.0
3.7 3.0 2.6 2.0
5.3 5.26.8
9.611.3
6.3 6.8 7.610.0
11.610.911.811.610.811.711.512.012.313.1
(13.3)(13.7)
10.910.710.8
10.8
10.810.7
10.9
10.6
10.1
9.5 8.8 7.9
7.5
7.17.1
7.5 7.67.7
7.9 8.1 8.0 8.18.3
(8.8)
(9.9)
20.8%
18.3%
18.2%
16.9%
20.4%
20.3%
21.0%
22.8%
24.0%
18.7%18.6%18.9%
20.6%
21.9%22.1%
23.6%
22.6%
18.3%
20.5%
19.5%
20.6%20.4%
21.7%
(23.0%)
(24.4%)
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0Interest Payments
Redemption of the National Debt
National Debt Service / Total Expenditures (%)
(trillion yen, %)
ActualBudget(2015:supplementary)
(2016:initial)
(FY)
Historical Changes in Debt Service
28
Assumption interest rate
1.6% / 10Year
(Source) Ministry of Finance