-=abbo~sf

8
\Vater & Sewer Services REPORT To: Abbotsford/Mission Water & Sewer Commission (WSC) From: Len Stei n, Director of Utility Operations Date: November 26,2012 Subject: JAM ES Plant Monthly Report - Nove mber 2012 Fi le : 5500-90 Rep ort No .: WSC 118-2012 UTILITY MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE (UMC) RECOMMENDATION THAT Report No . WSC 118-2012, dated November 26,2012, from Len Stein, Director of Utility Operations, regarding JAMES Plant Monthly Report - November 2012, be received. DISCUSSION Th e plant effluent quality met all regulatory parameters for effluent discharge during the month of November 2012 and was we ll with in the regulated limits. The key plant measurement parameters discussed below are defined and tabulated in appendices A-E. Al l results are forwa rd ed to MoE on a qu arterly and yearly basis. All non-complian ce parameters are listed in the reports to MoE. InfluenVEffluent Data (Appendix A) This shows the daily flows and influent and effluent quality on each day of th e month. Th e fecal coliform test gives an indication that bacteria originating from the intestines of warm blooded an imals may be present in the wa stewater. All the required fecal coliform testing for the month of November 2012 were within acceptable limits . Th e limit for coliforms is 200 counts per 100 ml outside the init ia l dilution zone. Th e counts recorded are end of pipe prior to dilution from the Fraser River. Biochemical Oxygen Deman d (BOD) (Appendix B) BOD is the rate at which ox ygen in was te water is used for the decomposition of organic matter in the waste wa ter. Hig h BOD rates reflect high organic content in the was te wate r. Treatment plant processes reduce BOD levels before discharge to the environmen t. Th e following chart compares monthly ave rag e BODs in mg/I.

Upload: others

Post on 10-Jul-2022

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: -=Abbo~sf

-=Abbo~sf<?rd rr>' I/~flSSlOn

\Vater & Sewer Services

REPORT

To: Abbotsford/Mission Water & Sewer Commission (WSC)

From: Len Stein, Director of Utility Operations

Date: November 26,2012

Subject: JAMES Plant Monthly Report - November 2012

File: 5500-90

Report No.: WSC 118-2012

UTILITY MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE (UMC) RECOMMENDATION

THAT Report No. WSC 118-2012, dated November 26,2012, from Len Stein, Director of Utility Operations, regarding JAMES Plant Monthly Report - November 2012, be received.

DISCUSSION

The plant effluent quality met all regulatory parameters for effluent discharge during the month of November 2012 and was well within the regulated limits. The key plant measurement parameters discussed below are defined and tabulated in appendices A-E. Al l results are forwa rded to MoE on a quarterly and yearly basis. All non-compliance parameters are listed in the reports to MoE.

InfluenVEffluent Data (Appendix A)

This shows the daily flows and influent and effluent quality on each day of the month. The fecal coliform test gives an indication that bacteria originating from the intestines of warm blooded an imals may be present in the wastewater.

All the required fecal coliform testing for the month of November 2012 were within acceptable limits. The limit for coliforms is 200 counts per 100 ml outside the initial dilution zone. The counts recorded are end of pipe prior to dilution from the Fraser River.

Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) (Appendix B)

BOD is the rate at which oxygen in wastewater is used for the decomposition of organic matter in the waste water. High BOD rates reflect high organic content in the wastewater. Treatment plant processes reduce BOD levels before discharge to the environment.

The following chart compares monthly average BODs in mg/I.

Page 2: -=Abbo~sf

WSC Report No. 118-2012 Page 2 of 3

Nov. Oct. Sept. Nov. Nov. 2011/2012 2011/2012 2011/2012

Parameter Re(lulation 2012 2011 Variance Variance Variance BOD Influent mg/l n/a 295.6 309.1 -13.5 +95.1 +140.1 BOD Effluent mg/l 45.0 4.9 9.3 -4 .3 -1.9

The average BOD strength in the plant effluent for the three months listed was well below the regulated limit of 45 mg/!. BOD on the influent has increased due to industrial loading and increased concentration (not being diluted from the domestic sewage from Langley).

Total Suspended Solids (TSS) (Appendix C)

Total suspended solids are the total amount of solids that remain in suspension in the water. The higher the suspended solids concentration the harder the effluent is to disinfect and the higher the Biochemical oxygen demand will be.

The following chart compares monthly averages TSS in mg/!.

Nov. Oct. Sept.

-1 .6

Nov. Nov. 2011/2012 201112012 2011/2012 Parameter Regulation 2012 2011 Variance Variance Variance TSS Influent mg/l n/a 452.8 382.1 +70.7 +434.3 +356.8 TSS Effluent mg/l 45.0 7.5 13.0 -5.5 -4.0 -6.0

The above compares the average of TSS influent and TSS effluent strength over the same time period one year previous, for three consecutive months and is well below the regulated limit of 45 mg/!. For the month of November influent TSS are still higher than last year but are returning to a more normal level over the two prev,ious months.

Ammonia (NH3l (Appendix D)

Nov. Oct. Sept. Nov. Nov. 2011/2012 2011/2012 2011/2012

Parameter Regulation 2012 2011 Variance Variance Variance NH3 Influent mg/l n/a 24.2 23.8 +0.4 +3.8 +1 .2 NH3 Effluent mg/l ** 12.6 11 .1 +1.4 +6.3 +10.7

** Acute ToxIcity threshold chart Appendix E

All tests done for the month of November were well below the toxicity curve. In recent months Ammonia has increase over the same time period last year. Ph in the effluent has also increased slightly increasing towards the toxicity curve. This can be seen in appendix E.

Biosolids Utilization

2012 Biosolids Utilization Program (total to end of October. 2012) Highland Valley Mine 2,763 tonnes Biosolids to Val-E-Gro 2,729 tonnes Val-E-Gro sales 13,748 yards

Page 3: -=Abbo~sf

WSC Report No. 118-2012 Page 3 of 3

SUMMARY

The plant effluent quality throughout the month of November 2012 met all regulatory parameters for effluent discharge.

Jim Gor on, P.Eng. Gener Manager of Engineering and Regional Utilities

---~-

Len Stein, A.Sc.T. Director of Utility Operations

Page 4: -=Abbo~sf

CITY OF ABBOTSFORD J.A.M.E.S POLLUTION CONTROL CENTRE INFLUENT/EFFLUENT DATA FOR THE MONTH OF NOVEMBER 2012

Influent Effluent Influent Effluent Effluent Effluent

Date Weather Flow

cBOD cBOD Suspended Suspended Total Fecal

(m3/d ay) Solids Solids Ammonia Coliforms (mg/L) (mg/L)

(mg/Ll (mg/Ll (mg/L) (CoI/100mL) 1 L' ht rain . 62,60(1.0 408.0 4.0 657.0 " 11.3

2 Cloud 55.100.0 267.0 5.0 340.0 7.8 11.4

3 Rain. 57,460.0 265.0 4.0 394.0 8.2 11.2

4 Overcast 55.070.0 192.0 4.0 356.0 8.6 11 .5

5 Partl cloudv 57,930.0 260.0 40 341.0 8.0 9.1

6 Overcast. 56,690.0 274.0 30 400.0 9.6 12.1

7 A few clouds. 55,920.0 247.0 40 346.0 7.0 16.7 00

8 A few clouds. 52 ,660.0 304.0 50 427.0 8.8 15.4

9 A few clouds. 49,580.0 364,0 5.0 473.0 4.0 10.9

10 A few clouds 47,350.0 358.0 5.0 4440 8.8 15.6

11 Overcast. 45.850,0 272.0 50 344 .0 8.2 13,7

12 Rain showers. 55.360.0 > > 501 .0 8A 154

13 Overcast 54.590.0 270.0 G 425.0 7.8 16.7

14 Overcast 55.260.0 331 .0 10.0 525.0 8A 14.7 10.0

15 >0 . 51 .950.0 G G 630.0 6.6 11.4

16 A few clouds. 51.970.0 H H 600.0 78 14.0

17 Overcast. 55,410.0 H H 465.0 6.0 15.9

18 Cloud . 52,510.0 318.0 6.0 477.0 6.0 12.3

19 Heavy ra in 68,140.0 304.0 5.0 459.0 9A 9.2

20 Overcast 64,840,0 559.0 7A 7.7

21 Cloud . 60.2700 523.0 8.2 11.6

22 Overcast 55,000.0 344.0 A A 00

23 Rain. 59.570.0 379.0 5.8 10,5

24 >0 . 54.500.0 346.0 5.8 116

25 Cloud. 51 .390.0 565.0 6A 12.3

26 Part cloud

27

28

" 30

Min 45,850.0 192.0 30 340.0 40 7.7 0.0

M" 68,140.0 408.0 10.0 657.0 9.6 16.7 10~ Avo 55,478.8 295.6 4.9 452.8 7.51 12.6 3.31 Total 1,386.970.0

Municipal Wastewater Regulations Parameters

Maximum Flow • 122,SOO cubic meters/day BOD Average Reduction: 98% BOD - 45 mgtl Suspended Solids • 4S mg/l Suspended Solids Ave. Reduction: 98% Fecal Coliform, max - 200 coioniesf100 ml sample Note: Fecal coliform testing is done once per week. Weather is obtained at 8:00 am daily from : TheWeatherNetwork.com (Location : Abbotsford, BC)

Appendix A

DEFINITIONS

BOD (Biochemical Oxygen Demand) is defined as the rate at which microorganisms use the oxygen in waste­water while stablizing decomposable organic matter under

aerobic conditions.

BOD Test is a procedure that measures the rate of oxygen use under controlled conditions of time and temperature. Standard test conditions include dark incubation at 20 C for a period of 5 days.

Suspended Solids (s.s.) are solids that either float on the surface and/or are suspended in water, wastewater, or other liquids, and which are largely removable by laboratory

filtering.

Ammonia N (Ammonia Nitrogen) is tested as an indicator of toxicity in the ptant effluent. General rule of thumb is that toxicity is being approached when the Ammonia N is in the 20 - 25 mg/l range if the PH is above 7.S. At that range or beyond, there is a good possibility of failing the required 96 hour LCSO Bioassay Test as outlined by Environment Canada

Fecal Coliform Test is an indicator for the presence of bacteria originating from the intestines of warm-blooded animals and their presence may be indicative of the presence of disease producing organisms that may be found with them. Zero or counts below the maximum level of 200 cotonies/100 ml sample indicates that sufficient chtorine has been used for disinfection purposes. Coliform counts are end of pipe, the regulation is oul side the initial dilution zone

LEGEND (NOTES):

A· No "''''pIe dUll to PO""'" 001"(10

e _ No .. mple du~ to plu9JOld SlImp/o r r.,o$.

C· No samp'" due to frn~en .. mple< lubi"ll

O · No ""mp'" d U<l to sample r error

E · DO ' .... di"ll _. be/owaccoptobi< ",,,.,.. R.""lto di""arded

F· No l. bo.-atory technicOa n In, Tuting noldon •.

G ·Oth~, (Equipmenl error)

H · 800 IN analysis past holding time .

Page 5: -=Abbo~sf

JAMES Pollution Control Centre Three Month BOD Data Comparision 2011 vs . 2012

Biochemical Oxygen Demand Municipal Wastewater Regulation Parameter

Effluent BOD - 45mgll maximum

Date Variance

o n 11 n ')ao n 1Ino n ~ n n " n [ 252.0[ 458.0[ 6.0[ 6.0[ 3230[ 353.01 vv [ ~v[ vvv.v[ ,"v.v[ .v.v[ 2 5.0 3 ' n

4 204.01 272.01 4.01 501 332.01 415.01 fO[ 5.0[ [431 .01 192.0 5 242.01 335.01--I~J 5.01 363.01 439.01 15.01 4.01 366.01 260.0 6

8 I 259.0[ 179.0 [ 7.0 [ 4.0[ 340.0[ 361~01 8.01 4.01 339.01 304.01 10.01 5.1 9 EI 279.01 4.0[ 4.0[ 286.0[ 383.01 7.0[ 12.0[ 410.01 364.01 10.01 5.0 10 303.01 334.01 6.0[ ".0[ 296.01 370.01 9.0[ 4.0[ 448.01 358.0[ 13 .0[ 5. 11 161 .01 372.01 6 .01 5.0[ [303.0[ 299.01 _6,OL 6.0[ [274.01 272.0[ 9.0[ 5. 12 I 206.01 295.01 501 . 6~01--r 305.01 462.01 L 5.01 5.01 210.01 F 13 333.01 356.01 7.0[ A[ 301 .01 301 .01 7.0[ 3.0[ 280.01 270.0[ 6.0 14 01 558.01 6.0[ 7.0[ 350.01 693.01 ~ __ Aj 293.01 331 .0[ 8.0[ 10.1 15 474.01 450.0 1 6.01 7.0 1 '313.01 681.01 7.01 6 .01 322.01 GI 5.01 G 16 01 328.01 8.0[ 4.0[ 235.0[ 751 .01 6.0[ 6 .0[ 371.01 H[ 12.0[ H 17 01 289.01 4.0[ 3.0 [ 313 .0[ 417.01 9.0[ 15.0[ 373.01 H[ ".2[ H

- ' -8 -1227.01 320.01 7.01 3.01 272.01 655.01 9.01 8.01 246:01 318.01 5.01 6.1 19 I 277.01 719.01 6.01 6.01 259.0[ 409.01 7.01 5.01 [276.01 304.01 7.01 5.0 20 313.01 484.01 15.0[ 4.0[ 351 .0[ 451 .01 8.0 [ 5.0[ 212.01 7.0 21 312.01 921 .01 6.0[ 3.0[ 340.0[ 369.01 LQL __ 4,QL 1.,265,OL 10.0 ~[--E]'-'-615.ol ,. -n-EI~C 01 367.01 7.01 5.01 264.01 10.0

23 T 248.OT 287.OT I 7.0 3.0 338.0 371 .OT T 7.OT 7.OT I 213.OT I T 22.OT 24 I 210.0 293.0 6 .5 3.0 290.0 318.0 I 8.0 AI 257.01 I 7.0 I 25 -L 243.Q1 489.Q1 -L 6.0 4.0 347.0 SI. ~ 8.0 EI 345.01 I 9.0 I 26 . I 223.01 60401 8.01 4.01 275.01 265:OJ ~ 8.01 5.01 319.01 18.0 27 233.01 467.01 5.0 [ 5.0[ 275.0[ 292.01 8.0 [ 4.0[ 246.01 ..lQ 28 326.01 491 .01 6.01 5.01 359.01 239.01 9.0 [ 5.0[ 276.0[ 9.0 29 I 313.01 542.01 7.0[ 4.01 337.01 250.01 9.01 4.0J 018.01 7.0

IM IN 161 .0[ 179.' 18.0 5.0 3.0 3.0 [MAX 474.01 921 .0 447.0 l' 341 15.0 17.0

-2.01 210.0 2.01 448.0

192.01 -18.0 408.01 -40.0 22.0

[AVG 267.31 407.4 140.

LEGEND (NOTES): A - No sample due to power outage. B - No sample due to plugged sampler lines. C - No sample due to frozen sampler tubing. o - No sample due to sampler error. E - DO reading was below acceptable level - Results discarded. F - No laboratory technician in. Testing not done. G - Other (Equipment malfunction). H - BOD Analysis past holding time.

91 7.9 6.0 -1.91 309. 295.61 -13.5 9.3

Appendix B

3.0 10.0

4.9

Elf.

0.0

-12.0 -4.3

Page 6: -=Abbo~sf

JAMES Pollution Control Centre Three Month TSS Data Comparision 2011 VS. 2012

DATE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12 13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

MIN.

MAX.

AVG.

Sep-11 Sep-12 Variance Sep-11 Inf. TSS Inf. TSS Inf. Eff. TSS

332.0 649.0 6.6 321 .0 491 .0 12.0 287.0 362.0 13.0 291 .0 457.0 13.8 414.0 587.0 10.0 436.0 590.0 0 466.0 697.0 25.8 451 .0 603.0 15.0

G 695.0 11.2 345.0 570.0 14.4 132.0 654.0 13.0 304.0 367.0 16.2 310.0 685.0 13.8

0 604.0 16.0 368.0 652.0 12.2

0 720.0 13.0 0 557.0 13.8

243.0 538.0 12.8 338.0 1,351 .0 14.6 339.0 932.0 13.6 322.0 1,113.0 13.4 302.0 1,068.0 11 .2 307.0 652.0 12.0 295.0 480.0 10.6 278.0 666.0 11.8 298.0 1,191 .0 15.2 326.0 779.0 12.8 373.0 825.0 14.2 349.0 642.0 13.0 431 .0 516.0 0

132.0 362.0 230.0 6.6 466.0 1,351 .0 885.0 25.8 333.0 689.8 356.8 13.4

LEGEND (NOTES): A - No sample due to power outage . 8 - No sample due to plugged sampler lines. C - No sample due to frozen sampler tubing. o - No sample due to sampler error.

Sep-12 Variance Eff. TSS Efl.

10.2 9.8 9.6 6.8 9.0 5.6 5.8 8.6 6.4

10.0 7.2 6.8

A 4.2 7.0 8.8 7.8 4.2 9.2 5.4 5.2 6.2 7.2 6 .8 4.6 9.0 5.8

10.2 7.4

10.2

4.2 -2.4 10.2 -15.6

7.4 -6.0

E - DO reading was below acceptable level- Results discarded. F - No laboratory technician in. Testing not done. G - Other (Equipment malfunction).

Total Suspended Solids

Oct·11 Oct·12 Variance Oct-11 Oct-12 Variance Inf. TSS Inf. TSS Inf. Eff. TSS Eff. TSS Efl.

322.0 775.0 14.2 8.6 280.0 662.0 16.4 12.4 449.0 0 18.0 0 319.0 748.0 16.6 6.2 317.0 535.0 12.6 5.8 393.0 845.0 13.2 10.0 307.0 547.0 12.6 13.4 334.0 609.0 16.4 12.4 320.0 668.0 15.0 8.2 352.0 700.5 17.6 15.6 360.0 1,040.0 14.4 12.8 431 .0 1,220.0 15.2 11.2 355.0 1,213.0 13.6 13.2 356.0 1,027.0 13.0 A 311 .0 1,485.0 12.4 9.6 301 .0 1,628.0 13.8 8.2 466.0 1,382.0 11 .0 13.2 344.0 1,721 .0 19.6 10.8 350.0 771 .0 15.4 9.0 446.0 680.0 12.6 10.6 384.0 576.0 9.2 10.0

0 752 .0 12.0 10.8 358.0 750.0 12.0 9.6 345.0 442.0 12.4 A 391 .0 604.0 13.6 9.2 415.0 525.0 19.0 5.0 410.0 428.0 11 .8 9.0 408.0 397.0 10.0 12.6 475.0 521 .0 12.8 8.2 389.0 443.0 14.4 4.2

0 392.0 12.4 9.0

280.0 392.0 112.0 9.2 4.2 -5.0 475.0 1,721 .0 1,246.0 19.6 15.6 -4.0 368.6 802.9 434.3 14.0 10.0 -4.0

Appendix C

Nov·11 Nov·12 Inf. TSS Inf. TSS

G 657.0 431 .0 340.0 361 .0 394.0 417.0 356.0 334.0 341 .0 313.0 400.0 527.0 346.0 481 .0 427.0 477.0 473.0 477.0 444.0 363.0 344.0 276.0 501 .0 403.0 425.0 637.0 525.0 627.0 630.0 334.0 600.0 367.0 465.0 272.0 477.0 372.0 459.0 252.0 559.0 334.0 523.0 405.0 344.0 322.0 379.0 317.0 346.0 379.0 565.0 369.0 325.0 197.0 383.0 330.0

197.0 340.0 637.0 657.0 382.1 452.8

Municipal Wastewater Regulation Parameter EffTSS - 45mgll maximum

Variance Nov·11 Nov·12 Variance Inf. Eff. TSS Eff. TSS Efl.

G 7.4 15.2 7.8 11.2 8.2

0 8.6 0 8.0 0 9.6

16.2 7.0 10.8 8.8 17.6 4.0

9.4 8.8 10.8 8.2

9.2 8.4 10.0 7.8 15.8 8.4 12.4 6.6 16.8 7.8 11.4 6.0 22.8 6.0 21.8 9.4 11.4 7.4 14.2 8.2 13.2 A 13.0 5.8 12.0 5.8 10.8 6.4 13.4

8.0 13.6

7.0 9.8

143.0 7.0 4.0 -3.0 20.0 22.8 9 .6 -13.2 70.7 13.0 7.5 -5.5

Page 7: -=Abbo~sf

JAMES Pollution Control Centre Three Month Ammonia Data Comparision 2011 VS. 2012

Date Sep-11 I Sep.12 I Variance I Sep-11 I Sep-12 Inf. NH3 Int. NH3 lnt. Eft. NH3 Eft. NH3

18 .51 25.91 7.31 17.8 2

-'-4

5 5 11 6 c 17.4

16.: 22.5 5.: 19.2 8 16.6 22. 3: 19.5 9 D 2_4.. 38 18.4

~ 22: 25 5. 20.3

--'l 20. 12 19. 13

14 18. 15 24 20-" j O. 12.0 16 -" 20.~ 9.6 16.4 17 D 18 19

20

21

22 5.6 14.4 23 21 .5 19.1 3.5 13 .5 24 22, -~.() 7.2 11 . 25 23. 24.4 8.4 15: 26 23. 22.7 11.3 15.' 27

~ 29

Efl.

Ammonia

Oct-11 I Oct-12 I Variance I Oct-11 I Oct-1 2 I Variance I Nov-11 I Nov-12 I Variance I Nov-11 I Nov-12 I Variance I Inf. NH3 lnf. NH3 Int. Eft. NH3 Eft. NH3 Eft. Inf. NH3 Inf. NH3 Inf. Eft. NH3 Eft. NH3 Eft.

25.21 6 .51 16 22.51 7.01 16.

21 1 c. ~4 , 28.3 10.5 12.8 22. 23.8 D 9.

22.5 29.2 7.4 11.8 2UJ _ 23.6 D ---'-£. 24.5 31.3 7. 16. 23.6 ~ _' 4.§ -.!§.. 213 :),6,0 6 , 16.2 23. 27.6 16.0 15.4 N. 32.1 6.5 15.5 14.8

25.8 6 . 29.0 11.4 14.

17.9 27.9 ~ ~ 2S.! 3.2 10.0 --.1.1A ---'JL 13.0 1~ .

3.4 2. 4 7.4 7.9

18. 6.3 7. ).0 13.5 6.4 12.: 2§.: 19.6 12. --'-1..§ c 27.2 3.B 16.: ~ 27. 6.9 A

22: 21 .5 4.6 14.4 ~4 .

~ 6.6 D 19. 2' 7. 15.6

16. 16.51 8.41 1231 23.81. -'- ___ 11M

30

31

D .. 23~ 1 ~~:~ I ~~i l 1~; 1 ~ ....... r---t

IMIN

IMAX

LEGEND (NOTES); A . No sample due to power outage. S • No sample due to plugged sampler lines. C • No sample due to frozen sampler tubing . 0- No sample due to sampler error. E - DO reading was below acceptable level · Results disca rded. F - No laboratory techniciabn in . Testing not done. G - Other (Eq uipment malfunction).

-' ~9.1 11

1' •. 1~ .

Appendix D

Page 8: -=Abbo~sf

November 2012 Effluent Ammonia vs pH

200

180

160

140

_ 120 ...J c;, .s .~ 100 c: 0 E E ~ 80

60

40

20

i

\ \ \ \ -+-Acute Toxicity Threshold

\ • Effluent Data

\ \ ~

~¥l" ~ • .lito.

0 . 6 6.4 6.8 7.2 7.6 8 8.4 8.8 9.2 9.6

pH

Appendix E