abb pa life cycle services serviceport access to ... · finding a needle in a hay stack few units...
TRANSCRIPT
ABB PA Life Cycle Services
ServicePort – Access to Efficiency Performance Services
© ABB Group
September 26, 2012 | Slide 2
Lifecycle Services Development Charter (agenda)
Identify
Value
Packaged Services
Sales
Productivity
Service
Tools
Optimize
Processes
Maximize
Systems
Responsive Efficient
Standard
Develop services and tools that address customer needs
Increase
Efficiency Increase Productivity
Leverage
Knowledge Built on
Expertise
Service
Development
Identify
Value Packaged Services
© ABB Group
September 26, 2012 | Slide 3
Lifecycle Services Development Charter (agenda)
Identify
Value
Packaged Services
Sales
Productivity
Service
Tools
Optimize
Processes
Maximize
Systems
Responsive Efficient
Standard
Develop services and tools that address customer needs
Increase
Efficiency Increase Productivity
Leverage
Knowledge Built on
Expertise
Service
Development
Identify Value
Packaged Services
© ABB Group September 26, 2012 | Slide 4
Fingerprint Services follow a proven process
Diagnose (Fingerprints) Measure performance gap
Forecast Return on Investment
Deliver action plan
Implement (HandsOn) Fix performance gap
Define monitor plan
Sustain (Scan/Track) Manage performance gap
Schedule maintenance
Define condition triggers
Maintain to conditions
Proactive and collaborative
Increased
performance
1
Service
2
3
Diagnose
(Fingerprints)
Implement
(HandsOn)
Sustain
(Scan/Track)
Scalable Advanced Services delivery
Scalable Service Delivery
0 100
75
50
25
Best Option
Technical Tools
Troubleshooting/Implementation
Fingerprint
Stand alone
1. Service Solution – Loop Performance, Loop Tuning, Batch Performance
2. Service delivery – Fingerprint, Remote analysis, Continuous monitoring
3. Fingerprint is a light application with no hardware using technical tools
4. Technical Tool usage for Troubleshooting and implementation
5. ServicePort provides continuous monitoring, requires ServicePort Channels
ServicePort
Channels -
Continuous
monitoring
© ABB Group September 26, 2012 | Slide 7
© ABB Group September 26, 2012 | Slide 7
© ABB Group September 26, 2012 | Slide 7
© ABB Group September 26, 2012 | Slide 7
ABB Fingerprint Services: packaged deliverables for control systems and customer processes
Common Fingerprint:
Boiler, Paper Machine, OMC,
Alarm/Security
QCS (VPA, Shift Day, Standardize)
Loop Performance
Transition Analysis
Batch Analysis
Tuning
Loop Performance Services
Data Collection
DL300
Loop Performance Fingerprint
Loop Analyzer
Signal Analyzer
Loop Tuning
LoopTune
Plant Wide Disturbance Analysis
Loop Analyzer
Batch Analysis
Sequence Analyzer
High Speed data analysis
HSD500/AGP400
Loop Performance Monitoring
ServicePort Loop Performance Channel
© ABB Group
September 26, 2012 | Slide 8
Continuous
Improvement at
Maximum efficiency
Diagnose
Implement
Solution Problem
Loop
Performance
Management
© ABB Group
September 26, 2012 | Slide 9
LoopScan makes process troubleshooting efficient
Easy to identify issues
Hard to find THE
problem.
Impractical to find with
simple tools
Important to avoiding
false positives.
Finding a needle in a hay stack
Few units
Many units
Control loops will degrade in performance
PID Controllers are designed to:
Regulate the process
Reduce product instability
Improve operations
Manual Operation Output Out of range Increasing Variability Improving process
However, ABB is finding that:
PID loops are not being maintained
PID loops have degraded
PID loops are standing in the way of
production and performance.
35%
15% 30%
25%
Half life of process controllers Given: 100 PID loops all tuned at once.
Then: within 6 months, 50 of these loops will
degrade in performance.
Months
100
Loop p
erf
orm
ance
de
gra
da
tio
n
50
06
Simple PID utilization
© ABB Group
September 26, 2012 | Slide 11
Diagnose Implement Sustain
Performance
potential
Application
Process
Time
Loop Performance Services manage performance gap
© ABB Group
September 26, 2012 | Slide 12
Diagnose Implement Sustain
Performance
potential
Application
Process
Time
Loop Performance Services manage performance gap
1) Fingerprint
1
Gap
Goal Present
DiagnoseDiagnose
Gap
Goal Preset
© ABB Group
September 26, 2012 | Slide 13
Diagnose Implement Sustain
Performance
potential
Application
Process
Time
Loop Performance Services manage performance gap
2) Implementation
2
Implement
1 2 3
Implement
1) Fingerprint
1
Gap
Goal Present
DiagnoseDiagnose
Gap
Goal Preset
© ABB Group
September 26, 2012 | Slide 14
Diagnose Implement Sustain
Performance
potential
Application
Process
Time
Loop Performance Services manage performance gap Sustain
Periodic Evaluation Periods
3) Scan
3 Manage
performance
gap
2) Implementation
2
Implement
1 2 3
Implement
1) Fingerprint
1
Gap
Goal Present
DiagnoseDiagnose
Gap
Goal Preset
© ABB Group
September 26, 2012 | Slide 15
Diagnose Implement Sustain
Performance
potential
Application
Process
Time
Loop Performance Services manage performance gap Sustain
Periodic Evaluation Periods
3) Scan
3 Manage
performance
gap
4
4) Track
Alert
2) Implementation
2
Implement
1 2 3
Implement
1) Fingerprint
1
Gap
Goal Present
DiagnoseDiagnose
Gap
Goal Preset
Fingerprint
On-Site
Performance Services reactive to proactive Event-driven action
Scheduling Collection Analysis Resolution
Collection Analysis Resolution
Collection Analysis
Collection Analysis Resolution
KPI
Trending
On Site
Remote On Site
On Site
Data Pool Remote
On Site
Data Pool
Resolution
On Site
On Site
On Site
Collection Analysis Resolution
Condition
Monitoring
On Site
Data Pool Remote
Event Trigger
On Site
Se
rvic
eP
ort
Reactive
Proactive
Short Lead time
No Lead time
Scan Services
Track Services
Periodic Remote
Enabled Service
Modules
© ABB Group September 26, 2012 | Slide 17
© ABB Group September 26, 2012 | Slide 17
ABB Fingerprint finds gaps, develops customer ROI
Data Collection/Testing
12 to 24 hours at 5-second data
Controller parameters
Customer interview: process area and
loop criticality definitions.
Performance Evaluation
Standard Methodology
Analysis Expertise
Performance Visualization
Report
Gap Analysis
ROI Forecast
Action Plan
Benchmark ROI Findings Plan
OPC
Collection
Tools
People
Process
Tools
Report
Action
Problem
Interpret
Analyze
View
Get
Goal: Continuous Improvement
Process Loops
Prioritize
and
Categorize
Tuning
Actuator
Signal
Logic
1 2
3
4
1 2
3
4
1 2
3
4
1 2
3
4
Action Plan
Implement
Stand Alone Tools Signal Analyzer
LoopTune
Loop Analyzer
Continuous Tools • ServicePort
© ABB Group
September 26, 2012 | Slide 19
Optimization Services: Performance Migration
Maximum Off Specification
Diagnose: Current
Implementation: Corrective Action
Sustain: Improvement Projects
Optimal: Mechanical Constraints
Reduction in Variability = Less Raw Material Usage
Improved energy consumption
Wider Operating Window
Increases in production, quality, and product purity
Faster troubleshooting time
Advanced Automation Solutions
Goal
© ABB Group
September 26, 2012 | Slide 20
QCS Performance Fingerprint
Production Capability Thruput
Reel Speed
Lost Time
Reel Variability Total
Distribution
Trends
Control Utilization Auto/Manual
Grade change
Fingerprint Inputs: Shift/Day Report
VPA reel Report
Standardize Report
Check Sample Reports
Tuning/Setup Parameters
ABB Analysis Tools VPA200
CU100
SA100
MD400
Excel
ReportPro
Non Invasive – One week of scope
Sensor Stability Standarize
Check Sample
Calibrate Sample
Settings
QCS Performance Fingerprint
© ABB Group
September 26, 2012 | Slide 21
QCS Performance
Fingerprint
Packaged Service
Modules
Implementation
Solutions
Production Capability
Reel Statistics
Control Utilization
Sensor Stability
Tuning/Setup Cluster
Non Invasive
Well defined
decision tree for
optimal solution
definition
© ABB Group
September 26, 2012 | Slide 22
QCS Performance Fingerprint Production: Variability and Lost Time
Range 100 t/d
Average 3 hr/day
If variability can be reduced,
Then the reduction translates
into a production increase.
Lost time contribution: Grade
Change, Sheet Break, start
up, quality problems.
Control Utilization tool – reading Shift/Day Info
© ABB Inc.
September 26, 2012 |
System Reel Report
?
Target Actual Efficiency RES MDL CD TOT
38.28 38.28 100.00 1.54 0.34 0.81 1.77
Target Actual Efficiency RES MDL CD TOT
3.70 3.70 100.00 1.08 0.30 0.59 1.26
Basis Wt 1 LBS
Moisture 1 PCT
Quality Analysis
2-Sigma’s
© ABB Group
September 26, 2012 | Slide 24
QCS Performance Fingerprint: Variability Distribution
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
2 Sigma as % of Process [Umidita Pope]
Perc
ent
CD MDL MDS TOT
Master_85_90 Master_100_120 Master_140_180 Master_200 Master_230_240
Master_280 Master_300_320 Master_350_360 Master_400
Master_85_90 13.553 14.629 8.509 21.682
Master_100_120 10.292 11.733 7.589 17.355
Master_140_180 9.875 12.138 6.150 16.813
Master_200 8.376 7.117 4.372 11.800
Master_230_240 8.228 10.451 5.314 14.324
Master_280 8.058 10.040 4.929 13.785
Master_300_320 7.479 10.216 5.885 13.962
Master_350_360 8.957 9.473 5.206 14.038
Master_400 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
2 Sigma as % of Process [Grammatura]
Perc
ent
CD MDL MDS TOT
Master_85_90 Master_100_120 Master_140_180 Master_200 Master_230_240
Master_280 Master_300_320 Master_350_360 Master_400
Master_85_90 1.557 1.587 2.463 3.318
Master_100_120 1.711 1.365 2.426 3.268
Master_140_180 1.113 1.670 1.617 2.578
Master_200 1.398 1.233 1.364 2.310
Master_230_240 1.609 2.655 1.546 3.468
Master_280 1.617 2.342 1.599 3.264
Master_300_320 1.465 2.806 1.476 3.493
Master_350_360 0.877 2.575 2.074 3.421
Master_400 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.3
2 Sigma [Ceneri]
2 S
igm
a
C D MD L MD S TO T
Master_85_90 Master_100_120 Master_140_180 Master_200
Master_230_240 Master_280 Master_300_320 Master_350_360 Master_400
A ll data in participating groups
Master_85_90 0.177 1.075 0.682 1.285
Master_100_120 0.138 0.932 0.575 1.104
Master_140_180 0.145 0.983 0.456 1.094
Master_200 0.138 0.777 0.441 0.904
Master_230_240 0.105 0.740 0.421 0.858
Master_280 0.118 1.043 0.457 1.145
Master_300_320 0.109 1.023 0.451 1.123
Master_350_360 0.102 0.813 0.641 1.040
Master_400 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
A ll data in participating groups 0.135 0.941 0.515 1.081
Grammatura Umidità
Ceneri MDL represents the frequency band
between 1 minute and 45 minutes.
MDL is 3 to 5 times higher than
expected in all measurements
© ABB Group
September 26, 2012 | Slide 25
QCS Performance Fingerprint: Control Utilization
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Machine 0 Controller Utilization By Month
MonthOct 2010 Nov 2010 Dec 2010 Jan 2011 Feb 2011 Mar 2011
CassaAfflusso Ceneri Grammatura PastaalSecco Umidita1Umidita2 VelocitaCoordinata
Month
CassaAfflusso 82.03 93.17 74.21 86.24 88.11 91.76Ceneri 80.18 90.03 71.64 84.14 83.04 89.40
Grammatura 79.76 90.68 71.65 83.14 84.86 88.78PastaalSecco 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.37 14.79 16.60
Umidita1 74.89 86.86 70.92 78.76 78.61 86.62Umidita2 60.47 53.39 47.35 54.85 58.17 55.24
VelocitaCoordinata 34.75 35.84 25.32 37.92 30.81 35.73
Goal >95%
1
QCS Performance Fingerprint: Tuning Number KPI’s
© ABB Group
September 26, 2012 | Slide 26
Value High Limit Low Limit Value High Limit Low Limit Value High Limit Low Limit Value High Limit Low Limit
Name DW01_Control MT01_Control MT02_Control AC01_Control
Description Reel Bone Dry Reel Moisture Size Moisture Reel Ash
MV and SP Units (cu) lbs/ream % % %
Output Units (cu) % % % %
Number of Decimals 2 2 2 2
Range Maximum (cu) 100 20 20 30
Range Minimum (cu) 0 0 0 0
Maximum Setpoint (cu) 100 20 20 30
Minimum Setpoint (cu) 0 0 0 0
Setpoint Ramp (customer/sec) 0.200 1.000 0.010 0.100 1.000 0.010 0.100 1.000 0.010 0.060 1.000 0.010
Deadband (fraction) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Normal Control Error (fraction) 0.300 0.300 0.100 0.300 0.500 0.200 1.000 1.000 0.200 0.200 0.300 0.100
Control Error Sp Change (fraction) 0.300 0.400 0.100 0.400 0.500 0.200 1.000 1.000 0.200 0.300 0.400 0.100
Control Model Filter (sec) 40 80 20 40s 100 30 50s 100 30 1m40s 180 40
Filter for Control (1=MDMS, 2=Filt MDMS,
3=FWPM, 4=Advanced) 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Filter for Display (1=MDMS, 2=Filt MDMS,
3=FWPM, 4=Advanced) 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Extended Sheet Break Time (sec) 20s 180 0 20s 180 0 20s 180 0 20s 180 0
Minimum Control Speed (cu) 10 200 5 10 200 5 10 200 5 10 200 5
Extended Control Speed Time (sec) 20s 180 0 20s 180 0 20s 180 0 20s 180 0
Download Auto Mode Restore FALSE 0 0 FALSE 0 0 FALSE 0 0 FALSE 0 0
Modeling Value High Limit Low Limit Value High Limit Low Limit Value High Limit Low Limit Value High Limit Low Limit
Process Response (proc/actr) 0.026 0.2 0.005 -0.100 -0.05 -0.5 -0.100 -0.05 -0.5 0.021 0.1 0.01
Process Response Gain (unitless) 1.200 1.3 0.7 1.000 1.3 0.7 1.000 1.3 0.7 1.000 1.3 0.7
Process Response Final Calculated 0.031 0.2 0.005 -0.100 -0.05 -0.5 -0.100 -0.05 -0.5 0.021 0.1 0.01
Process Time Constant (sec) 52s 80 25 1m00s 120 40 1m10s 120 40 2m00s 180 60
Transport Distance (distance) 1100 2000 300 350 1000 100 450 1000 100 1100 2000 300
Actuator DeadTime (sec) 1m00s 120 20 1m00s 90 10 1m10s 90 10 1m30s 180 60
Closed-loop Time Constant (TAU) 1.5 3 1.2 1.5 3 1.2 1.5 3 1.2 1.5 4 1.5
Max Actuator Change (actr/sec)) 300 500 100 50 100 20 50 100 20 1.5 200 20
Max Actuator Change in AGC mode (actr/sec) 500 500 100 50 100 20 50 100 20 1.5 200 20
Feed Forward (stock flow) Value High Limit Low Limit Value High Limit Low Limit Value High Limit Low Limit Value High Limit Low Limit
Enable TRUE 1 0 TRUE 1 1 FALSE 0 0
Process Response 0.015 0.05 0.005 0.018 0.000 0.5 0
Process Resp Gain 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Process Time Constant 50s 80 25 20s 80 25 52s 80 25
Transport Distance (Feet) 1100 2000 300 700 2000 300 500 2000 300
Actuator Deadtime (Sec) 1m00s 120 20 1m00s 120 20 1m00s 120 20
Filter Time 0s 20 0 0d0h0s 20 0 0s 20 0
Error Check (frac of SP) 1 1 0.2 1 1 0.2 1 1 0.2
Additional ChecksControl Model Filter Matches Process Time
Constant
Stock Feed Forward Time Constant matches
Stock to Weight Time Constant
Ratio of Feedforward time constant to primary
process time constant is not greater than 2.5
Feed forward filter is only used when feed
forward is tuned as a lead action
Weight Reel Moisture Size Moisture AshConfiguration
Tuning Check
Advanced Controls
Speed
Auto grade
MD Tuning Numbers
Scan Level
Modeling
Feed forward
Level 1
CD Tuning Numbers
Tuning
Modeling
Setup/Tuning Validation
Limit Check
Cross Check
QCS Performance Fingerprint: Sensor Stability
© ABB Group
September 26, 2012 |
Standardize Reports
Ensure reliable measurements
Check Sample Reports
Ensures repeatable measurements
Calibrate Sample
Ensures exact process measurements
0
1
Standardize Problems
Sta
ndari
ze P
roble
m S
en
sors
Air Column StdzAsh Stdz
Brightness StdzCaliper Stdz
Color StdzFormation Stdz
Moisture StdzOpacity Stdz
Weight Stdz
5
6
7
8
9
10
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
0
2
4
6
8
10
10
20
30
40
50
0
20
40
60
80
100
10
20
30
40
50
8 Thu
Jan 2009
15 Thu22 Thu 1 Sun 8 Sun 15 Sun22 Sun 1 Sun 8 Sun 15 Sun22 Sun
Frame 1:Caliper - Caliper Standardize
Sen
sor
Max
Sen
sor
Nois
e
Sen
sor
Zero
Bot
Pre
ssu
re
Sta
tus
Top
Pre
ssu
re
Sensor Max Sensor Noise Sensor Zero
Bot Pressure Status Top Pressure
1
© ABB Group
September 26, 2012 | Slide 28
© ABB Group September 26, 2012 | Slide 28
Harmony Fingerprint uses Harmony Analyzer
Firmware
Loading •GMI Suppression of Exception Reports
•Process Control Unit Overload
•Control way Problem Evidence
•TMax Exception Period Collision
•Error Counters
Jumpers
1
Control System Performance Fingerprint:
• Proprietary analysis tools
• Defined Scope
• Trained Engineers
System Issues
Harmony Diagnostic Tools Overview
© ABB
Aug 13, 2012 | Slide 29
Harmony Diagnostic Tools: semAPI
Harmony Direct (OPC Server)
DL300 (Datalogger)
HPA200 (Analyzer)
Prerequisites: CIU (ICT03/13) on central loop
Local bridges consist of IIT03 w/ B.4
firmware
1 Fingerprint can contain up to 3 loop,
50 PCUs per loop
Analyzing Diagnostic Data Harmony Performance Analyzer (HPA200)
© ABB
Aug 13, 2012 | Slide 30
The Harmony Performance Analyzer is used to analyze the collected data from the DL300 and provide valuable information using graphs and
tables that could help improve system performance.
Harmony Analyzer (HPA200) System Layout
© ABB
Aug 13, 2012 | Slide 31
The Harmony Analyzer provides a system topology layout. Each scanned loop becomes available for viewing. All PCUs, CIUs, and Bridge
nodes become visible in proper node order.
Harmony Analyzer (HPA200) Firmware Audit
© ABB
Aug 13, 2012 | Slide 32
A firmware audit can be conducted using the HPA200. Each module’s firmware revision is compared to the latest released revision. The HPA200
highlights modules with outdated firmware. Major revision changes are shown in red and minor changes are highlighted in yellow.
Harmony Control System Fingerprint Report
© ABB
Aug 13, 2012 | Slide 33
The report summarizes the system and any issues found. Each issue is given a recommended plan of action for an engineer
to tackle. Auto-generated reporting will eventually become an added feature to the Harmony Analyzer.
ServicePort – Scan solution
© ABB Group
September 26, 2012 | Slide 34
OS -35
Return On Investment
Steady State -Variability Reduction
Target Shift
Quality Improvement
Less Broke as related to variability
Improved Lab test
Sheet Break reduction
Disturbance Rejection
Transient
Grade/Shade Change
Sheet Break recovery time – MD
Sheet Break recovery time – CD
Reduced Start Up time
© ABB Inc.
September 26, 2012 |
Machine
Response
Product
Variability
Stock
Approach
Stability Poor regulation
Offset from setpoint
Good regulation
Fingerprint: Weight and Moisture
0
20
40
60
80
100
CD
Deca
de 1
Deca
de 2
Deca
de 3
Deca
de 4
Deca
de 5
Deca
de 6C
OV
as a
perc
en
t o
f to
tal
weight
moisture
COV Weight = 5.17
COV Moisture = 36.45
Slow response
Fast response
Cyclic response
-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65
Actual vs. Calc. Profiles for 1 inch Zones
Profi
le
Zones
Actual Calculated
Profiling
Capability S
igm
a
Current Potential
Evaluates: Cyclic content of Weight and
Moisture in: Cross Direction and Machine
Direction from High Frequency up 500Hz
down to Low Frequency of 5 hours.
Evaluates: Automatic and
Manual mode operation of:
Weight, Moisture, and Total
Head.
Evaluates: On control
Performance and model for:
Weight, Moisture, and Caliper
Evaluates: On control
Performance of: Total Head,
Thick Stock Flow, Thick Stock
Consistency, Machine Chest
Level
Provides information on:
• Start up time
• Grade Change recovery
• Disturbance reduction
• Sheet break recovery
• Responsiveness
Provides information on:
• Controllable Energy
• Mechanical Pulsations of vibrations
• Benchmark of machine stability
Provides information on:
• Controllable Energy
• Stock Approach performance
• Tuning Quality
• Oscillation sources
Provides information on:
• Will CD control improve the profile?
• Is current CD control optimized?
Fingerprint: Paper Machine
History (VPA)
OS
-3
7
Spectral Overlay
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.000
0.025
0.050
0.075
0.100
10-3 10-2 10-1 100 101
Sensor m100 Power Spectrum Comparison
BW11 m1
00MW
11 m100
Frequency (Cycle/Time)
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
0.000
0.025
0.050
10-2 10-1 100 101 102
Sensor M1k Power Spectrum Comparison
BW11 m1
kMO1
1 m1k
Frequency (Cycle/Time)
0.0000
0.0005
0.0010
0.0015
0.0020
0.0000
0.0025
0.0050
0.0075
0.0100
10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1
Overnight Power Spectrum Comparison
/AI C
hann
el/1M
E1.C
W11M
V:VA
LUE
1MT1
CTRL
:MV
Frequency (Cycle/Time)
Weight
Moisture
Weight
Moisture
Weight
Moisture
Single Point
1000Hz sample
3.4 min duration
Single Point
100Hz sample
34 min duration
Scanning
0.5Hz sample
5.7 Hrs duration
9.8 Min 17 Min
0.36 Hz
60 Hz
12 Hz
OS
-3
8
PM Fingerprint: Product Variability
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Fingerprint Comparison - % Total COV
Co
mp
ariso
n
CD Decade 1 Decade 2 Decade 3 Decade 4 Decade 5 Decade 6
Weight Moisture
Weight 25.3743210 50.5483932 6.1163764 1.8690249 6.7068100 3.6419485 5.7431183 Moisture 2.2876263 84.7719421 3.6153731 0.5106572 0.8314567 2.8962073 5.0867424
QCS DCS Mechanical
Provides a summary of
the cyclic energy in the
sheet over a
corresponding frequency
band.
Includes Cross direction,
Weight and moisture up to
100 hertz.
OS
-3
9
PM Fingerprint: Machine Response
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Machine Response IndexTotal = 38.476
Comp
ariso
n
1 2 3
Total Head Weight Moisture
Total Head 32.733Weight 3.040
Moisture 2.703
Acceptable
Performance
Provides an index for the
regulatory capability of
the control application. Machine
Response
Product
Variability
Fiber
Line
StabilityPoor regulation
Offset from setpoint
Good regulation
Fingerprint: Weight and Moisture
0
20
40
60
80
100
CD
Deca
de 1
Deca
de 2
Deca
de 3
Deca
de 4
Deca
de 5
Deca
de 6C
OV
as a
perc
en
t o
f to
tal
weight
moisture
COV Weight = 5.17
COV Moisture = 36.45
Slow response
Fast response
Cyclic response
-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
0 5 1 0 1 5 2 0 2 5 3 0 3 5 4 0 4 5 5 0 5 5 6 0 6 5
A c tu a l v s . C a lc . P r o file s fo r 1 in c h Z o n e s
Pro
file
Z o n e s
A c tu a l C a l c u l a te d
Profiling
Capability
Sig
ma
Current Potential
Machine
Response
Product
Variability
Fiber
Line
StabilityPoor regulation
Offset from setpoint
Good regulation
Fingerprint: Weight and Moisture
0
20
40
60
80
100
CD
Deca
de 1
Deca
de 2
Deca
de 3
Deca
de 4
Deca
de 5
Deca
de 6C
OV
as a
perc
en
t o
f to
tal
weight
moisture
COV Weight = 5.17
COV Moisture = 36.45
Slow response
Fast response
Cyclic response
-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
0 5 1 0 1 5 2 0 2 5 3 0 3 5 4 0 4 5 5 0 5 5 6 0 6 5
A c tu a l v s . C a lc . P r o file s fo r 1 in c h Z o n e s
Pro
file
Z o n e s
A c tu a l C a l c u l a te d
Profiling
Capability
Sig
ma
Current Potential
OS
-4
0
PM Fingerprint: Machine Response
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Machine Response IndexTotal = 38.476
Comp
ariso
n
1 2 3
Total Head Weight Moisture
Total Head 32.733Weight 3.040
Moisture 2.703
Acceptable
Performance
Provides an index for the
regulatory capability of
the control application. Machine
Response
Product
Variability
Fiber
Line
StabilityPoor regulation
Offset from setpoint
Good regulation
Fingerprint: Weight and Moisture
0
20
40
60
80
100
CD
Deca
de 1
Deca
de 2
Deca
de 3
Deca
de 4
Deca
de 5
Deca
de 6C
OV
as a
perc
en
t o
f to
tal
weight
moisture
COV Weight = 5.17
COV Moisture = 36.45
Slow response
Fast response
Cyclic response
-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
0 5 1 0 1 5 2 0 2 5 3 0 3 5 4 0 4 5 5 0 5 5 6 0 6 5
A c tu a l v s . C a lc . P r o file s fo r 1 in c h Z o n e s
Pro
file
Z o n e s
A c tu a l C a l c u l a te d
Profiling
Capability
Sig
ma
Current Potential
Machine
Response
Product
Variability
Fiber
Line
StabilityPoor regulation
Offset from setpoint
Good regulation
Fingerprint: Weight and Moisture
0
20
40
60
80
100
CD
Deca
de 1
Deca
de 2
Deca
de 3
Deca
de 4
Deca
de 5
Deca
de 6C
OV
as a
perc
en
t o
f to
tal
weight
moisture
COV Weight = 5.17
COV Moisture = 36.45
Slow response
Fast response
Cyclic response
-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
0 5 1 0 1 5 2 0 2 5 3 0 3 5 4 0 4 5 5 0 5 5 6 0 6 5
A c tu a l v s . C a lc . P r o file s fo r 1 in c h Z o n e s
Pro
file
Z o n e s
A c tu a l C a l c u l a te d
Profiling
Capability
Sig
ma
Current Potential
1 2 8 .0
1 2 8 .5
1 2 9 .0
1 2 9 .5
1 3 0 .0
8 5 .0 0
8 5 .2 5
8 5 .5 0
0 5 0 1 0 0 1 5 0 2 0 0 2 5 0 3 0 0 3 5 0 4 0 0 4 5 0 5 0 0 5 5 0 6 0 0
T o ta l H e a d : B o t to mT D H 3 0 - 4 6 0
SP
an
d M
VO
utp
ut
D a ta P o in ts , T s = 5 s e c
Automatic Mode
Closed Loop Test
SP Change
Manual Mode
Open Loop Test
Output Change
Also, visible signal
conditioning problems present
OS
-4
1
Machine
Response
Product
Variability
Fiber
Line
StabilityPoor regulation
Offset from setpoint
Good regulation
Fingerprint: Weight and Moisture
0
20
40
60
80
100
CD
Deca
de 1
Deca
de 2
Deca
de 3
Deca
de 4
Deca
de 5
Deca
de 6C
OV
as a
perc
en
t o
f to
tal
weight
moisture
COV Weight = 5.17
COV Moisture = 36.45
Slow response
Fast response
Cyclic response
-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
0 5 1 0 1 5 2 0 2 5 3 0 3 5 4 0 4 5 5 0 5 5 6 0 6 5
A c tu a l v s . C a lc . P r o file s fo r 1 in c h Z o n e s
Pro
file
Z o n e s
A c tu a l C a l c u l a te d
Profiling
Capability
Sig
ma
Current Potential
Machine
Response
Product
Variability
Fiber
Line
StabilityPoor regulation
Offset from setpoint
Good regulation
Fingerprint: Weight and Moisture
0
20
40
60
80
100
CD
Deca
de 1
Deca
de 2
Deca
de 3
Deca
de 4
Deca
de 5
Deca
de 6C
OV
as a
perc
en
t o
f to
tal
weight
moisture
COV Weight = 5.17
COV Moisture = 36.45
Slow response
Fast response
Cyclic response
-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
0 5 1 0 1 5 2 0 2 5 3 0 3 5 4 0 4 5 5 0 5 5 6 0 6 5
A c tu a l v s . C a lc . P r o file s fo r 1 in c h Z o n e s
Pro
file
Z o n e s
A c tu a l C a l c u l a te d
Profiling
Capability
Sig
ma
Current Potential
PM Fingerprint: Stock Approach Stability
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Fiber Stability IndexTotal = 7.8261
Comp
ariso
n
1 2 3 4
Total Head Chest Level Stock Flow Consistency
Total Head 0.1115000Chest Level 7.4440999Stock Flow 1.9641000
Consistency 1.4011000
Acceptable
Performance
Index points to Machine chest level
as the primary problem
Indicates the stability of the
fiber line. A high index
suggests problems related to:
process, control, mixing, etc.
OS
-4
2
Machine
Response
Product
Variability
Fiber
Line
StabilityPoor regulation
Offset from setpoint
Good regulation
Fingerprint: Weight and Moisture
0
20
40
60
80
100
CD
Deca
de 1
Deca
de 2
Deca
de 3
Deca
de 4
Deca
de 5
Deca
de 6C
OV
as a
perc
en
t o
f to
tal
weight
moisture
COV Weight = 5.17
COV Moisture = 36.45
Slow response
Fast response
Cyclic response
-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
0 5 1 0 1 5 2 0 2 5 3 0 3 5 4 0 4 5 5 0 5 5 6 0 6 5
A c tu a l v s . C a lc . P r o file s fo r 1 in c h Z o n e s
Pro
file
Z o n e s
A c tu a l C a l c u l a te d
Profiling
Capability
Sig
ma
Current Potential
Machine
Response
Product
Variability
Fiber
Line
StabilityPoor regulation
Offset from setpoint
Good regulation
Fingerprint: Weight and Moisture
0
20
40
60
80
100
CD
Deca
de 1
Deca
de 2
Deca
de 3
Deca
de 4
Deca
de 5
Deca
de 6C
OV
as a
perc
en
t o
f to
tal
weight
moisture
COV Weight = 5.17
COV Moisture = 36.45
Slow response
Fast response
Cyclic response
-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
0 5 1 0 1 5 2 0 2 5 3 0 3 5 4 0 4 5 5 0 5 5 6 0 6 5
A c tu a l v s . C a lc . P r o file s fo r 1 in c h Z o n e s
Pro
file
Z o n e s
A c tu a l C a l c u l a te d
Profiling
Capability
Sig
ma
Current Potential
PM Fingerprint: Stock Approach Stability
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Fiber Stability IndexTotal = 7.8261
Comp
ariso
n
1 2 3 4
Total Head Chest Level Stock Flow Consistency
Total Head 0.1115000Chest Level 7.4440999Stock Flow 1.9641000
Consistency 1.4011000
Acceptable
Performance
Index points to Machine chest level
as the primary problem
Indicates the stability of the
fiber line. A high index
suggests problems related to:
process, control, mixing, etc.
130
135
60
70
80
1800
1850
1900
4.1
4.2
0 250 500 750 1000 1250 1500 1750
Fiber Stability TrendsP oints = 1681
Total
Hea
dCh
est L
evel
Stoc
k Flow
Cons
isten
cy
raw data
Raw Data Trend (~5 hours) shows
that chest level impacts consistency
and stock flow.
OS
-4
3
PM Fingerprint: Profile Capability
-3.5
-3.0
-2.5
-2.0
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Actual vs. Calc. Profiles for 7.14 inch Zones
Profi
le
Zones
Actual Calculated
2 Sigma
• Original 0.54
• Capability 0. 38
• 30% Potential
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
0.030
0.035
0.040
0.045
0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07
Calc. Power SpectrumPoint Width = 7.14
Powe
r (va
rianc
e)
Frequency (Cycle/Distance)
Actual Calculated
Power Spectrum
Current and
Forecast
Machine
Response
Product
Variability
Fiber
Line
StabilityPoor regulation
Offset from setpoint
Good regulation
Fingerprint: Weight and Moisture
0
20
40
60
80
100
CD
Deca
de 1
Deca
de 2
Deca
de 3
Deca
de 4
Deca
de 5
Deca
de 6C
OV
as a
perc
en
t o
f to
tal
weight
moisture
COV Weight = 5.17
COV Moisture = 36.45
Slow response
Fast response
Cyclic response
-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
0 5 1 0 1 5 2 0 2 5 3 0 3 5 4 0 4 5 5 0 5 5 6 0 6 5
A c tu a l v s . C a lc . P r o file s fo r 1 in c h Z o n e s
Pro
file
Z o n e s
A c tu a l C a l c u l a te d
Profiling
Capability
Sig
ma
Current Potential
Machine
Response
Product
Variability
Fiber
Line
StabilityPoor regulation
Offset from setpoint
Good regulation
Fingerprint: Weight and Moisture
0
20
40
60
80
100
CD
Deca
de 1
Deca
de 2
Deca
de 3
Deca
de 4
Deca
de 5
Deca
de 6C
OV
as a
perc
en
t o
f to
tal
weight
moisture
COV Weight = 5.17
COV Moisture = 36.45
Slow response
Fast response
Cyclic response
-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
0 5 1 0 1 5 2 0 2 5 3 0 3 5 4 0 4 5 5 0 5 5 6 0 6 5
A c tu a l v s . C a lc . P r o file s fo r 1 in c h Z o n e s
Pro
file
Z o n e s
A c tu a l C a l c u l a te d
Profiling
Capability
Sig
ma
Current Potential
Using process data, setup information,
controller type, ABB can predict what
the capability of a current or new set of
actuators can do.
OS
-4
4
Fingerprint Block Diagram - Schedule
Paper Machine
Production
Data
Process
Data
VPA MR SS PC PV
RO
I
Exit Meeting: Benchmark, Initial findings and recommendations
Final Reports: Executive, Technical, and
Implementation Plan
Analysis
Final Analysis
Daily Activity List
Power Point per area
Week 1
Week 2
© ABB Inc.
September 26, 2012 |
High Frequency Results
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
0.0
0.2
0.4
10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1
Amplitude Spectrum ComparisonP oints = 131072
Basis W
eight
Moisture
1Mois
ture2
Cycles/PointX1000 Hz
Frequency Period BW MT1 MT2 diameter length Potential Source0.061 16.38 0.27 0.8 0.44 265 832 Machine Chest Level?
0.36 2.78 0.048 0.33 0.358 45.1 141.7 Top Felt
0.71 1.39 0.046 0.29 0.25 22.6 70.8 Wire?
1.84 0.54 0 0.298 0 8.76 27.5 ?
3.15 0.317 0.07 0.38 0 5.13 16.1 After Section Dryer
6.3 0.159 0.09 0.55 0 2.56 8.06 After Section Dryer
10.3 0.1 0.07 0.26 0.12 4.9 1.56 fan pump?
(Yankee speed = 3049fpm)
Amplitude
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
A E D C B G F
Single Point Frame data
collected at 100 Hz and
1000 Hz for complete high
frequency picture.
Provides insight into
pulsation and vibration in
both weight and moisture
OS
-4
6
Machine Chest Level Control Logic
65.0
67.5
70.0
72.5
75.0
55
60
65
70
75
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000
Raw Data
PM1_
AC45
0B_U
DMISC
_LI20
-331_
I_abb
svr_A
ccuR
ay_O
bjePM
1_AC
450B
_UDM
ISC_L
T20-3
10_I_
abbs
vr_Ac
cuRa
y_Ob
je
Sample Number, Ts = 5 , Total Samples = 7304
Manual
Operation
New
Control
Manual
Operation
New
Control
Control Logic Added,
Improvement > 90%
To
p C
he
st
Le
ve
l
B
ott
om
Ch
est
Le
ve
l
Diagnose: Fiber Stability Index High due to poor Machine chest regulation.
Implementation: Found that the poor Machine chest regulation was a control logic
problem. The logic was corrected, the loops were re-tuned, and the variability dropped by
over 90%
Sustain: Teach operators how to use new control logic, changed the SOP to make sure
control stayed in range.
OS
-4
7
Weight Before vs. After Tuning Changes
42.0
42.5
43.0
6
7
8
8300
8400
8500
4000 4500 5000 5500 6000 6500 7000 7500 Sample Number, Ts = 5 , Total Samples = 8653
Before After
Conditioned Weight
Moisture
Stock Flow
Improvement
45%
45%
50%
Additional 20 to 30% potential with improved stock flow regulation
OS
-4
8
Headbox 2 Before Vs After Tuning
07PIC2201 G: 6 to 2.2, Ti 11 to 13
07LIC2202 G: 1.4 to 0.6
Before After
OS
-4
9
Base Stock AI Setup Change
2300
2310
2320
2330
54.75
55.00
55.25
55.50
55.75
850 900 950 1000 1050 1100 1150 1200
Raw Data
Sample Number, Ts = 5 , Total Samples = 3242
07FIC101:MV 07FIC101:WSP
07FIC101:POUT 07ZI100.AI:VALUE
MV Deadband changed from 0.4% to 0.0%
Loop Performance Fingerprint
Evaluates: Overnight data - along
with the current DCS current loop tuning
parameters are used to benchmark DCS control
performance .
Evaluates: Bump
Tests - Performance of the
DCS control loops within two
categories including control,
process, and signal
conditioning issues.
Evaluates: Historical
Data - Process and control
loop interactions. Identifies
true source of process
disturbances.
Provides information on:
• Over and under control
• Output Oscillation
• Offset and out of range loops
• Limit cycle and manual mode
• Control loop tuning validity
Provides information on:
• Process and interactions
• Product Variability
• Raw material supply
Provides information on:
• Process upset response
• Bad Valves
• Over filtering
• Quantized signals
• Noisy signals
Root Cause Analysis
Loop Tuning
Evaluation
Process Stability
Proportional
Inte
gra
l
Pressure Control Tuning
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60
Proportional
Inte
gra
l
Pressure Control Tuning
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60
Proportional
Inte
gra
l
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Process Stabilit y Index
Occurr
ence
Oscillation Strange Bad Valve Process Out Of Range No Signal
27.10
27.12
27.14
27.16
27.18
27.20
27.22
27.24
27.26
27.28
27.30
27.32
42.0
42.1
42.2
42.3
42.4
42.5
42.6
42.7
42.8
42.9
43.0
43.1
93 421 749 1077 1405 1733 2061 2389
26-PIC-0334
MV
OU
T
26-PIC-0334.MV
26-PIC-0334.OUT
Operations interview to
define loop priority
Control Goals
Controller-
Set Point
Error Output
Controller Process Signal Conditioning
Controller Process FCE - Set Point Actual Process
Measured Process
Sensor
Disturbances
Error Output Input
Reduce error: SP-PV Insure Output impacts
Process
Minimize difference between actual
and measured process
Process FCE Actual Process
Disturbances
Output Input
Actual Process
Measured Process
Sensor
CONTROL PROCESS SIGNAL CONDITION
C1: Static Output P1: FCE Out of Range S1: Dead Signal
C2: Over tune P2: FCE Size S2: MV Out of Range
C3: Slow tune P3: FCE Broke S3: Quantization
C4: FCE travel P4: Calibration / FCE Leakage S4: Compression
C5: Offset P5: Intermittent Disturbance S5: Excessive Noise
C6: Error Deadband P6: Persistent oscillatory Dist. S6: Spikes
C7: Setpoint Oscillations P7: Questionable S7: Step Out
C8: Controller update rate slow S8: Over filter
C9: Questionable S9: Sampling rate
S10: Questionable
Signal
Conditioning
© ABB Group
September 26, 2012 | Slide 52
Terms
Signal Conditioning: Getting the measurement to the controller with as “true” a signal as possible! (~15 items)
Sample time, Filtering, Quantization, deadbands, compression, compensation, calibration, saturation, decimal points, Dead Signals, Spikes, Outliers, non-Gaussian noise, Noise bursts, square root extraction.
Process: Ensuring that the FCE to Actual Process (Transfer Function) is repeatable and predictable. (~21 items)
Disturbances that are more powerful than the FCE, Process nature changes, process nonlinearity (sideways tank), FCE failure: Stiction, Backlash, hysteresis, resolution (on time, pulse width), valve size, valve type, DP drop across valve, cavitation, vena contracta, valve positioners, cams, electronic cams, VFD, process out of range.
Control: Deals with keeping the error near or at zero. Means is we want the MV to track the SP. (~25 items)
Tuning parameters, algorithm type, Setup parameters related to hi and low setpoint, output, and PV ranges, number of decimal points, Controller execution rate, Control deadbands, Additional degrees of freedom such as non linearity compensation options: gain scheduling, “beta” factor, adaptive control, out of range: wind up, loop is off(manual), offset from setpoint, rate of change of output, rate of change of setpoint, filtering.
ProcessFCE Actual ProcessSensor
Disturbances
Output Input
Process Actual Process
Measured Process
Sensor
Signal Conditioning Process
Controller-
Set Point
Error Output
Control
KPI Determination
Data
Mathematical Formulations
KPI
Rules
Diagnoses
Solution Surface
Loop Performance
Setpoint
Measured Value
Output
Mode (Optional)
Setup
Tuning Parameters
KPI Navigation
Trend Visualization
KPI sorted by severity
KPI sorted by number of problems
Overall rating for KPI Categories
Loop Analyzer
Loop Performance KPI’s
• Control
• Process
• Signal Conditioning
Sorting on KPI severity
Oscillating
Output Manual
Over
Control
Output
Out Of
Range
Slow
Control
Oscillating
Setpoint Offset Deadband Noisy Spikes Quantized
Over
Filtered Oscillation Strange
Bad
Valve
Process
Out Of
Range
1 LIC21-1115
PIC21-
1112
LIC21-
1132
LIC21-
1081
1MT1.CT
RL FIC101ST
LIC21-
1095 FIC21-1110 FIC20-311
LIC21-
1146 TDH30-460 LIC21-1101
PDIC11-
1006
LIC21-
1132
FIC30-
1403
2 PIC21-1140
LIC21-
1146 PIC20-301
LIC21-
1115 FIC20-335 1PL1.CTRL FIC30-425
FIC21-
1112 LIC21-1147 LIC11-030
LIC21-
1095
LIC21-
1125
FIC30-
1402
3 LIC21-1101
PIC21-
1103B
FIC21-
1114
LIC21-
1101
FIC21-
1108 FIC20-311 FIC20-335 1MT1.CTRL
FIC21-
1154 FIC30-425
4 LIC21-1125
FIC21-
1156
CIC21-
1129
PIC21-
1140
FIC21-
1109
NIC30-
772:MV FIC21-1114
FIC21-
1092
PIC21-
1140
5 LIC21-1132
FIC21-
1154
PIC21-
1150
LIC11-
1001
RIC21-
130
FIC21-
1113 LIC21-1115
FIC21-
1155 BP_SIZE
6 PIC21-1145
FIC21-
1092 LIC20-310
LIC21-
1132 FIC101ST
PIC21-
1103B LIC21-2005
FIC21-
1107
7 LIC21-2005
LIC21-
1147
FIC21-
1110
1PL1.CTR
L
PIC21-
1145 PIC20-301
8 PIC20-301
PIC21-
1112A
FIC21-
1107
FIC21-
1114
FIC21-
1003 PIC21-1140
9 FIC21-1114 LIC11-030 LIC30-462 BP_SIZE 1PL1.CTRL
10 PIC21-1150
FIC21-
1112
CIC21-
1129 RIC21-130
11 LIC20-310
FIC21-
1003 PIC20-301 LIC21-1132
12 RIC21-130
PDIC11-
1006 LIC30-462
1SP.CTRL:
MV
13 BP_SIZE
FIC21-
1113
LIC21-
1132 LIC30-462
14 FIC30-425 LIC20-310 LIC20-310
15 LIC30-462
FIC21-
1113
16
1DW1.CT
RL
17
1MT1.CT
RL
18
FIC21-
1110
19 FIC20-335
20
FIC21-
1155
21
FIC21-
1107
22
LIC11-
1001
Control Signal Conditioning Process
Classification
KPI Reporting
Supports Loop Performance
Fingerprint
© ABB Inc.
September 26, 2012 | Slide 56
Loop Performance Fingerprint Loop Analyzer – Performance Calculations
Navigation
options
Diagnosis
results
in tree
Loops Ranked
for selected
Diagnosis
Diagnosis results in frame for selected loop
Navigate by
clicking on
bars
© ABB Inc.
September 26, 2012 | Slide 57
Loop Performance Fingerprint Loop Analyzer – More Plots
Plot types
Quick comparison plots, any plot
type, one tag frozen on top half
Power Spectrum
Histogram
Group Trend
© ABB Inc.
September 26, 2012 | Slide 58
Loop Performance Fingerprint Final Control Element Problem
This is a flow controller that is the inner loop of a cascade.
Exhibits classic stiction
Controller output ramps up and down in triangular pattern
Process variable moves in square wave
Loop Analyzer on Compressed Data
Compressed Data resulting in wrong classification
© ABB Inc.
September 26, 2012 | Slide 61
Loop Performance Fingerprint Report
The report highlights some loops, as shown in the previous
slides and summarizes the results in tables. This table is
for the TFE Synthesis section of the plant.
© ABB Inc.
September 26, 2012 | Slide 62
Loop Performance Fingerprint Plant wide Disturbance Analysis
Disturbances in chemical plants act on many process variables
LC1
TI1
TI7
DP1
TI6
TI2
TI3
DP2
TI4
LI2 TI5
TC1
TI2 TI1
DP2
LI2
DP1
LC1
TI2 TI1
DP2
LI2
DP1
LC1
TI2 TI1
DP2
LI2
DP1
LC1
TI2 TI1
DP2
LI2
DP1
LC1
TI2 TI1
DP2
LI2
DP1
LC1
TI2 TI1
DP2
LI2
DP1
LC1
TI2 TI1
DP2
LI2
DP1
LC1
TI2 TI1
DP2
LI2
DP1
LC1TI2
TI1
DP2
LI2
DP1
LC1
TI2 TI1
DP2
LI2
DP1
LC1
TI2 TI1
DP2
LI2
DP1
LC1
TI2 TI1
DP2
LI2
DP1
LC1
Disturbances can propagate counter flow because of recycle and
thermal integration
© ABB Inc.
September 26, 2012 | Slide 63
Loop Performance Fingerprint Plant wide Disturbance Analysis
Disturbances in chemical plants act on many process variables
LC1
TI1
TI7
DP1
TI6
TI2
TI3
DP2
TI4
LI2 TI5
TC1
TI2 TI1
DP2
LI2
DP1
LC1
TI2 TI1
DP2
LI2
DP1
LC1
TI2 TI1
DP2
LI2
DP1
LC1
TI2 TI1
DP2
LI2
DP1
LC1
TI2 TI1
DP2
LI2
DP1
LC1
TI2 TI1
DP2
LI2
DP1
LC1
TI2 TI1
DP2
LI2
DP1
LC1
TI2 TI1
DP2
LI2
DP1
LC1TI2
TI1
DP2
LI2
DP1
LC1
TI2 TI1
DP2
LI2
DP1
LC1
TI2 TI1
DP2
LI2
DP1
LC1
TI2 TI1
DP2
LI2
DP1
LC1
Disturbances can propagate counter flow because of recycle and
thermal integration
© ABB Inc.
September 26, 2012 | Slide 64
Loop Performance Fingerprint Plant wide Disturbance Analysis
Disturbances in chemical plants act on many process variables
LC1
TI1
TI7
DP1
TI6
TI2
TI3
DP2
TI4
LI2 TI5
TC1
TI2 TI1
DP2
LI2
DP1
LC1
TI2 TI1
DP2
LI2
DP1
LC1
TI2 TI1
DP2
LI2
DP1
LC1
TI2 TI1
DP2
LI2
DP1
LC1
TI2 TI1
DP2
LI2
DP1
LC1
TI2 TI1
DP2
LI2
DP1
LC1
TI2 TI1
DP2
LI2
DP1
LC1
TI2 TI1
DP2
LI2
DP1
LC1TI2
TI1
DP2
LI2
DP1
LC1
TI2 TI1
DP2
LI2
DP1
LC1
TI2 TI1
DP2
LI2
DP1
LC1
TI2 TI1
DP2
LI2
DP1
LC1
Disturbances can propagate counter flow because of recycle and
thermal integration
© ABB Inc.
September 26, 2012 | Slide 65
Loop Performance Fingerprint PCA Cluster Example
Find signals with
similar patterns,
probably due to
disturbances
Not looking for
oscillating signals
Here all signals are
in two columns that
are adjacent
© ABB Inc.
September 26, 2012 | Slide 66
Implementation Example PID Loop Parameter Example
Improved tuning after
implementation phase
The tuning documented
during Fingerprint
Questionable
Range
Sweet Spot
Signal Analysis
LoopTune: Implementation improvements
© ABB Group September 26, 2012 | Slide 68
Analysis
Identification
Tuning and Simulation
LoopTune Standard Reporting
Visualization
and Setup
Collection
LoopTune
Results stored as a LoopTune channel in ServicePort
Provides long term process model tracking.
Supports
Self Regulating
Non-Self Regulating
Auto Model Identification
LoopTune: Tuning/Simulation
Supports
800xA Controllers
Harmony/Infi90 Controllers
Mod300 Controllers
Generic industry standard controllers
Plug in modules for custom controllers
LoopTune: Loop Tuning Report
Automatically generates
Loop Tuning Reports
© ABB Group September 26, 2012 | Slide 72
© ABB Group September 26, 2012 | Slide 72
Example of improved control loop performance
Original Tuning
(Unstable)
New Tuning
Manual Operation
Much
Better
AGP400: High Speed Data Collection
© ABB Group
September 26, 2012 | Slide 73
Portable
or
Continuous
P/V Kit
© ABB Group September 26, 2012 | Slide 74
© ABB Group September 26, 2012 | Slide 74
Sequence Analysis
Multiple Changes
Custom Trend Visualization
Detailed Analysis
Standard KPI
Transition
Time Deviation Error
Prediction
Accuracy
KPIs
Batch Analysis Overview of Methodology Define Event Marking
Perform Aggregate Statistics and KPI’s Data View
Batch Process
Sequence 3
Segment Definitions
Sequence Definition options: leading edge, falling edge, time
trigger, user defined, external triggers, logical conditions
Sequence 1
Sequence 2
© ABB Group
September 26, 2012 | Slide 77
© ABB Group September 26, 2012 | Slide 77
Introducing Performance Channels
Goal: Maintain improved
performance level
Adjust service operating
procedures
Improve standard operating
procedures
Remote Capable monitoring
Specifics are a function of the
Implement phase
Periodic monitoring of key
process indicators utilizing
local or remote expertise
© ABB Group
September 26, 2012 | Slide 78
Scan/Track: Remote Enabled Delivery Options
Root Cause
Analysis
Loop Tuning
Evaluation
ProcessStability
Proportional
Inte
gra
l
Pressure Control Tuning
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60
Proportional
Inte
gra
l
Pressure Control Tuning
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60
Proportional
Inte
gra
l
Proportional
Inte
gra
l
Pressure Control Tuning
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60
Proportional
Inte
gra
l
Pressure Control Tuning
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60
Proportional
Inte
gra
l
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Process Stabilit y Index
Occurr
ence
Oscillation Strange Bad Valve Process Out Of Range No Signal
27.10
27.12
27.14
27.16
27.18
27.20
27.22
27.24
27.26
27.28
27.30
27.32
42.0
42.1
42.2
42.3
42.4
42.5
42.6
42.7
42.8
42.9
43.0
43.1
93 421 749 1077 1405 1733 2061 2389
26-PIC-0334
MV
OU
T
26-PIC-0334.MV
26-PIC-0334.OUT
Packaged Services
(Fingerprint)Periodic
(LoopScan)
Continuous
(LoopTRACK)
Root Cause Analysis
Cluster Analysis
Loop Stability
KPI
KPI
KPI
TroubleshootingLocal DeliveryAutomated
Reporting
Event
Reporting
Notify
Alarm
Phone
Message
Trigger
Diagnose Sustain
Corr
ective A
ction
Implement
Local Remote Enabled Delivery
3
© ABB Group September 26, 2012 | Slide 79
ABB’s Advanced Process Control Methodology
Stabilize
Process -
Loop
Performance
Fingerprint
Process
Interaction
Matrix
Identification -
APC
Fingerprint
APC
System
Solution
(MIMO)
Process
Interaction
Matrix
Identification -
APC SCAN
Monitor
Performance
LoopSCAN
Pre Study + Implementation
Quick Customer Value
Project delivery improved
Installation and
commissioning Periodic Service
No results erosion
Continuous Improvement
Proven Approach
Service Service
3
© ABB Group
September 26, 2012 | Slide 80
Technical Tool Architecture
System
Hardware
Software
Control
Process
Sort Notify
Driver
Event History: KPI + Data
Optimization Tools
KPIs
Structured
Data Alarm
Phone
Message
Trigger
Fingerprint
Report
Scan Report
Track
Report Get
View Analyze Interpret Report
Unique Solutions
Common Infrastructure
DataPro
Data Segments
Service Applications
LCS Service
Data file
KPI
File User
ABB Applications
Key:
Technical Tools
Analyzer
Engine
Application
User Interface Fingerprint
Report
OPC
DL300
Data
Logger
Diagnostic Service Tools
Stand alone
User Driven
File based
Implementation
Corrective Action:
Tuning, Software,
Hardware, etc.
Stand alone – Technical Tools
Establish Value
Proof Statement
Standard Apps: Boiler Fingerprint
Alarm/Event Fingerprint
System Performance
Loop Analysis
Transition Analysis
Batch Analysis
Tuning
APC Fingerprint
LCS Service
Data file
KPI
File User
ABB Applications
Key:
Technical Tools
Analyzer
Engine
Application
User Interface Fingerprint
Report
OPC
DL300
Data
Logger
Diagnostic Service Tools
Stand alone
User Driven
File based
Implementation
Corrective Action:
Tuning, Software,
Hardware, etc.
Stand alone – Technical Tools
Scan Services
Regular
Track Services
Monitoring
ServicePort
Establish Value
Proof Statement
Standard Apps: Boiler Fingerprint
Alarm/Event Fingerprint
System Performance
Loop Analysis
Transition Analysis
Batch Analysis
Tuning
APC Fingerprint
© ABB Group
September 26, 2012 | Slide 83
© ABB Group September 26, 2012 | Slide 83
ABB ServicePort – Access to Efficiency!
The ABB ServicePort is the secure
portal through which customers access
configuration tools, diagnostic
applications, improvement activities,
performance-sustaining troubleshooting,
and scanning software that deploys
agreed actions. ABB can connect to any
system through ServicePort, which
resides at the customer site, and
implement fixes to diagnosed problems.
Regular delivery of Scan and Track services can
be done safely and securely with ABB’s
ServicePort.
© ABB Group
September 26, 2012 | Slide 84
ServicePort topology
Drives OCS Operator Stations Historian Instruments/
Actuators
Customer-Defined Access
Service Capabilities
APC Scan/Track
Services
Control Tuning Optimization
Services
Event
Notification
Support
Services
Software
Support
Remote
Troubleshooting
System
Health Check
DriveScan/Track LoopScan/Track HoistScan/Track ServicePro
Troubleshooting
Services
System Scan/Track
Engineering Stations
Local
Remote
Secure Access
Customer-Defined Access
Secure Tunnel
Firewall
Performance Channel Guide concept
© ABB Group
September 26, 2012 | Slide 85
ServicePort: Data Flows
800xA
Loop
Analyzer
Loop
Tune
Loop
Channel
Loop
Tune
ServicePort Explorer
Standard OPC
Batch
Analyzer
Batch
Channel
OCS OPC Direct
PDA
Analyzer
PDA
Channel
Alarm
Analyzer
Alarm
Channel
ABB
OPC
Data
Logger
(DL300)
800xA Standard OPC Raw
Data HSD500 OPC
© ABB Group
September 26, 2012 | Slide 87
ServicePort Explorer
Define/Search
for Triggers
ServicePort
Explorer
Channels
KPI1 Engine KPI2 Engine KPIn Engine
Event 1 Event 2 Event n
Explorer: View/Scan/Track Service Channels
• Process
• Platform
• System
• Drives
. . .
Service Channel Components
SCAN
TRACK
View
Goal Present
Math
Function
KPI(s)
Rules
Gap> rule= Alarm
Trend for Experts
• Expert level.
• Visual validation.
• No automatic triggers.
• Data arranged by asset requirements.
• Determination of a KPI that is
proportional to expert evaluation.
• Defines good and bad
performance.
Seve
rity
• Continuous evaluations of KPI
calculations and reporting.
• Tailored to customer requirements
of asset criticality.
ServicePort Explorer – Dave View
1. Select ServicePort – Displays navigation Menu 2. Expand Performance Analysis menu item
3. Expand Channel 10.1 – View
4. Select DataView. This will cause the display that is shown to appear 5. Next Select a loop name and a time event. The SP, MV, and Out along with loop
KPI’s will be displayed
ServicePort Explorer – Scan: Event and Time Views
1. Select ServicePort – Displays navigation Menu 2. Expand Performance Analysis menu item
3. Expand Channel 10.2 – Scan
4. Select EventView. This will cause the display that is shown to appear 5. Next Select a time event. The number of loops with problems related to control,
signal conditioning, or Process for this time event will be shown.
6. KPI Level 1 and Level 2 Pareto charts can be drilled into from the top drop down menu.
7. Historical Trends of KPI’s per event can be evaluated by selecting Time Based View
In this case, the
Signal Conditioning
KPI’s indicate a
large number of
violations.
ServicePort Explorer – Scan: Level 1 Event view
In this case, data compression is the cause of the signal KPI violations. This causes analysis results to be less accurate
ServicePort – Data View
ServicePort Explorer – Improved Navigation
Much Faster presentation of information.
ServicePort Explorer – Track (Near Future Release)
User builds Notification Rules.
Rules are logical expressions comparing KPI’s to thresholds of interest.
Violations will be stored in an event list or sent via email for support
User can pick the KPI of interest
© ABB Group
September 26, 2012 | Slide 95
Sustain: Scan KPIs to ensure improvement
1
KP
I T
rac
kin
g
Kpi1
Kpi3
Kpi2
Kpi4
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Delivery Schedule
Production
increase!
Variability
decrease!
Continuous
Improvement
LoopScan Performance Service Report
Statistical Evaluation of Historical KPI’s performed twice a year
Ensures stability of KPI’s
Reduces the risk of false positives
Keep up to date with process
Crucial to ensure continuous improvement
Service Delivery – Single Channel Delivery model
January December
SCAN Service Report: SCAN Analysis /report/Implementation planning/ Notification Validation
On Demand Service: Remote troubleshooting assistance/Track Triggered
Calibration Fingerprint/Training
Regular Performance Calculations/evaluations/Daily Usage
Pharma Oil and Gas
Chemical Channel Offerings
Industrial Automation
Loop Performance
Batch Performance
Transition Performance
Plant wide disturbance analysis
LoopTuning
OEE
APC Interactions
Platform Diagnostic Services
Harmony Performance
800xA Performance
Alarm and Event
Security
Drives
GMD
Low Voltage
Minerals
Hoist Performance
Dragline
Pulp and Paper
VPA
Control Utilization
Standardize
Check Sample
Calibrate Sample
Machine Direction Grade
Change Transition
Batch
Sheetbreak recovery
Startup efficiency
Profile performance
Profile transition
profile recovery
Profile tuning
Machine Direction QCS
Tuning
Product Variability
Machine Response
Profile Capability View Options: View – Scan - Track
Pharma Oil and Gas
Chemical Channel Offerings
Industrial Automation
Loop Performance
Batch Performance
Transition Performance
Plant wide disturbance analysis
LoopTuning
OEE
APC Interactions
Platform Diagnostic Services
Harmony Performance
800xA Performance
Alarm and Event
Security
Drives
GMD
Low Voltage
Minerals
Hoist Performance
Dragline
Pulp and Paper
VPA
Control Utilization
Standardize
Check Sample
Calibrate Sample
Machine Direction Grade
Change Transition
Batch
Sheetbreak recovery
Startup efficiency
Profile performance
Profile transition
profile recovery
Profile tuning
Machine Direction QCS
Tuning
Product Variability
Machine Response
Profile Capability View Options: View – Scan - Track
Customized Service
from
Proven Solutions
Service Delivery – Multi Channel Delivery model
January December
Scheduled SCANService: SCAN Analysis /report/Implementation planning/ Notification Validation
On Demand Service: Remote troubleshooting assistance
Calibration Fingerprint/Training
Periodic Performance Calculations/evaluations: Time based, Event based
Time
Event
Channel – Process/Equipment
ServicePort Pilot sites
© ABB Group
September 26, 2012 | Slide 101
SCA Eerbeek, NL
Gasco Habshan, AE
Glatfelter Chillicothe, OH, US
ABB Finland (development system)
IP Augusta, GA, US
ISAB Powerplant, IT
Kinross Mining, BR
Lion Copolymer Geismar, LA, US
Sappi Nijmegen, NL
UPM Changshu, Jiangsu, CN
GP Big Island, VA, US
APP Tjiwi Kima, Sidoarjo, ID
Boise International Falls, MN, US
Domtar Ashdown, AR, US
NOVA Chemical Painesville, OH, US
ServicePort - Benefit to Customer
Maintenance Expense
Production
Platform Stability
Tre
nd
s
ServicePort provides:
Proven Solutions, Immediate access to experts, Customizable Applications
Directly impacts: Production
ABB Apps
1 2 3 4 5 . . .
Advanced services: increasing customer loyalty and expanding service scope
Example: Chillicothe paper, Ohio, USA
Customer challenge: poor maintenance practices, poor
system performance and low quality after market parts
used by a third party negatively effecting the customers
own product quality.
ABB solution: A QCS performance Fingerprint,
ServicePro contract management tool were utilized to
identify the issues and to show best practices and tools.
Optimization services like continuous performance
tracking with ServicePort were included to create
customer value beyond traditional maintenance contracts.
Customer benefits: Value-add analysis which provided
the customer with increased automation efficiency beyond
the original scope of the audit.
Advanced services: increasing customer loyalty and expanding service scope
Example: Lion Copolymer, Louisiana, USA
Customer challenge: A three-line chemical polymers
plant makes multiple grade changes. Automation
performance has declined as product line expanded into
specialty chemicals.
ABB solution: LoopPerformance and Transition
Fingerprints packaged with Implementation Services for
Tuning and Corrective Action. ServicePort for sustaining
production enhancements.
Customer benefits: Estimates of over $1Million per year
in increased production and reduced off-spec waste
byproducts.
ABB benefit: 1st Chemicals Industry contract in the USA
with Transition Fingerprint and ServicePort. 1st Fingerprint
plus Implementation service contract for Chemicals
Industry growth initiative. Enhanced competitive position
against 3rd party with black box APC claims.
© ABB Group
Customer need
Replacement of knowledge that left the company
Expert support for legacy control system
Fast responses to production issues
ABB’s response
ServicePort for onsite control system support
Delivers ABB expert resources remotely
Provides tech support
Performs non-invasive checks on the operating
system
Temporary resident field service engineer
Customer Benefit
Replaces lost expertise
Solves tech support issues immediately
Identifies problems before they occur
Provides diagnostics to troubleshoot disturbances
Delivers ABB Optimization Solutions
Reduces costs
Need-identification-to-resolution within 45 days
Site: Pulp Mill, AR, USA
Unit: Pulp Mill
Issues:
Customer lost an important engineer
INFI 90 system required upgrade
Self-maintenance no longer possible
Agreement:
1-yr agreement + resident engineer
Customer Case Study Pulp mill, Arkansas, USA
ServicePort: Partnering for Success
Customer Benefit
Use of same technical tools that ABB experts use.
Regular updating of software.
Training/support/access to world class subject matter
experts.
Continuous Monitoring of customer defined assets.
Optimize time to solution as well as resource planning.
Periodic Performance Scan reports to ensure continuous
process improvement, reduced false positives, improved
key performance indicators, adaptation to conditions or
process changes.
ServicePort + Channels
© ABB Group
September 26, 2012 | Slide 107
ServicePort Base Unit
Calibration Fingerprint
Start-up Services
Process Channels
2 scan reports per year
On Demand Process Support
Equipment Channels
2 scan reports per year
On Demand Process Support
Workbench Troubleshooting/Implementation Tools:
DataLogger, Signal Analyzer, LoopTune, Loop Analyzer,
Sequence Analyzer
Remote Access Platform
Loop Performance Services Portfolio
Saleable Service Selection
Fingerprint
Implementation
WorkBench Tools
Data Logger
Signal Analyzer
Loop Tune
Loop Analyzer
ServicePort Base Unit
Process Channel
Remote Access Platform
Secure Data Tunnel
Training
© ABB Group
September 26, 2012 | Slide 108