aashto product evaluation list (apel) minutes/apel...nikita reed fldot [email protected]...

45
AASHTO Product Evaluation List (APEL) Meeting Agenda Working Session #5 Tuesday, May 19, 2015 8:00 AM – 9:30 AM Please sign the attendance sheet via the iPad 1) 8:10-8:40 AM: Program Status Update (Ross “Oak” Metcalfe) See slideshow for more information -APEL is used to post data for innovated products for state usage. Current APEL platform is over 14 years old. A new website is under development. APEL develops and carries out new test evaluations and posts state certifications and evaluations. APEL allows states and vendors to save time and money by having product evaluated just once. -APEL Council is made up of the APEL Coordinator, chair, vice chair, and 1 member from each region (minimum of 4 total; currently have 7). The chair and vice chair are currently vacant. We are looking for State Material Engineers to volunteer for these positions. Interested people can also become members at large of the council. -The council’s role is to review product applications and decide whether to proceed with testing. They evaluate the product to determine if it fits the scope of APEL before testing. Monthly meetings are conducted to discuss products and issues. -Products with existing specs/evaluation protocols are NOT applicable for APEL. Also, products already tested/evaluated by states should be posted in APEL by the testing state. -APEL process: initial request, detailed application, scope of work is developed, testing is performed, review and posting of evaluation results. State certifications/evaluations don’t go through much review and can be posted directly onto the APEL website. -7 products are in different phases of evaluation, 1 product completed, 3 products pending evaluation, 2 are going through review. 8 states have listed products on the APEL site with 54 total products tested. -APEL is looking to increase state participation. Developing a new, improved web module and seeking to evaluate more products. -AASHTO evaluated products are accelerated lab tested only (no field evaluation), with a cap of 12 months of testing timeframe. -State submitted products can be lab tested, field tested, or a combination 2) 8:40-9:10 AM: New APEL Module (Riaz Ahmad) Riaz gave a brief overview of what APEL is. APEL 2.0’s main goal is to simplify every process. New homepage gives summary of number of products currently housed in the APEL website. The website will have 3 separate product areas: AASHTO evaluated products: new products with no testing that have to go through APEL review process before testing DOT evaluated products: products already evaluated by DOT (no login required to post), very quick review process before posting to website by AASHTO State certified products: products certified by states go through simple review process before posting on website, certification wording comes from CFR Website allows any state member to post product information. This is reviewed by AASHTO before going live on the website

Upload: others

Post on 09-Jul-2020

16 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

AASHTO Product Evaluation List (APEL)

Meeting Agenda Working Session #5

Tuesday, May 19, 2015 8:00 AM – 9:30 AM

Please sign the attendance sheet via the iPad

1) 8:10-8:40 AM: Program Status Update (Ross “Oak” Metcalfe) See slideshow for more information

-APEL is used to post data for innovated products for state usage. Current APEL platform is over 14 years old. A new website is under development. APEL develops and carries out new test evaluations and posts state certifications and evaluations. APEL allows states and vendors to save time and money by having product evaluated just once. -APEL Council is made up of the APEL Coordinator, chair, vice chair, and 1 member from each region (minimum of 4 total; currently have 7). The chair and vice chair are currently vacant. We are looking for State Material Engineers to volunteer for these positions. Interested people can also become members at large of the council. -The council’s role is to review product applications and decide whether to proceed with testing. They evaluate the product to determine if it fits the scope of APEL before testing. Monthly meetings are conducted to discuss products and issues. -Products with existing specs/evaluation protocols are NOT applicable for APEL. Also, products already tested/evaluated by states should be posted in APEL by the testing state. -APEL process: initial request, detailed application, scope of work is developed, testing is performed, review and posting of evaluation results. State certifications/evaluations don’t go through much review and can be posted directly onto the APEL website. -7 products are in different phases of evaluation, 1 product completed, 3 products pending evaluation, 2 are going through review. 8 states have listed products on the APEL site with 54 total products tested. -APEL is looking to increase state participation. Developing a new, improved web module and seeking to evaluate more products. -AASHTO evaluated products are accelerated lab tested only (no field evaluation), with a cap of 12 months of testing timeframe. -State submitted products can be lab tested, field tested, or a combination

2) 8:40-9:10 AM: New APEL Module (Riaz Ahmad) Riaz gave a brief overview of what APEL is. APEL 2.0’s main goal is to simplify every process. New homepage gives summary of number of products currently housed in the APEL website. The website will have 3 separate product areas:

AASHTO evaluated products: new products with no testing that have to go through APEL review process before testing DOT evaluated products: products already evaluated by DOT (no login required to post), very quick review process before posting to website by AASHTO State certified products: products certified by states go through simple review process before posting on website, certification wording comes from CFR Website allows any state member to post product information. This is reviewed by AASHTO before going live on the website

-Google search appliance will be utilized to make searching for products much easier. -APEL website is currently being designed and should go live in summer 2015.

LindsayBrown
Typewritten Text
Please scroll down to view attendance and the two presentations
LindsayBrown
Typewritten Text
LindsayBrown
Typewritten Text

NTPEP 2015 APEL Session AttendanceFirst Name Last Name Employer Email Phone

1 Riaz Ahmad iEngineering Corporation [email protected] 703-722-2980

2 Abu-Hawash Ahmad IA DOT [email protected]

3 Sam Allen TRI/Environmental, Inc. [email protected]

4 Tony Allen WA State DOT [email protected] 360-709-5450

5 Kenny Anderson INDOT [email protected] 317-610-7251 x203

6 Andrew Artar Gregory Industries, Inc. [email protected] 330-477-4800 x123

7 Kean Ashurst KY Transportation Center [email protected] 859-257-4513

8 Kyle Baranowski WVDOT [email protected]

9 Todd Bennett MODOT [email protected] 573-751-1045

10 Ken Berg UTDOT [email protected]

11 Jason Booth Quality Manager [email protected] 912-534-5757

12 Eric Booth Vice President [email protected] 912-534-5757

13 Heidi Bulgrin SmartDitch [email protected] 608-617-9078

14 Paul Burch AZ DOT [email protected] 602-712-8085

15 Brian Chestnut Lane Enterprises, Inc. [email protected]

16 Chris Cooper Azdot [email protected] 602-712-8365

17 Bill Corbett KTA-Tator, Inc. [email protected] 412-788-1300

18 Jack Cowsert NCDOT [email protected] 919-329-4000

19 David DeBruler Dayton Superior [email protected]

20 Kidada Dixon ALDOT [email protected] 334-353-6940

21 Thanh Do 3M Company [email protected] 651-733-2419

22 Rick Douds GADOT [email protected] 404-608-4805

23 Ashish Dubey Usg Corporation [email protected] 847-970-5256

24 John Eiche NVDOT [email protected]

25 Jeannie Elliott Crown Technology [email protected] 706-553-9500

26 Anne Ellis AZDOT [email protected]

27 William Faber Arizona DOT [email protected]

28 Kyle Fleege Phoenix National Laboratories [email protected] 602-431-8887

29 Keelie Floyd Compound Technologies [email protected]

30 Georgene Geary Principal Engineer [email protected] 770-337-5817

31 Jenjer Gella Fratco, Inc. [email protected] 219-954-0138

32 Paul Gentry FLDOT [email protected]

33 Jay Goldbaum CDOT [email protected] 303-398-6561

34 Dan Grasser WIDOT [email protected] 608-266-6885

35 Ethan Griffiths IDDOT [email protected]

36 Heather Hall TNDOT [email protected] 615-350-4104

37 Kelly Hanks Diamond Vogel Paints [email protected]

38 James Henry DCDOT [email protected] 202-671-2393

39 Wendy Henry QUIKRETE [email protected] 404-926-3180

40 Stan Hibma Vogel Paint Companies [email protected]

41 Bobby Howard Fratco, Inc. [email protected] 574-806-0936

42 Stephanie Huang AZDOT [email protected] 602-712-6430

43 Scott Hughes ILDOT [email protected] 217-782-7208

44 Brian Hunter NCDOT [email protected] 919-329-4093

45 Steven Ingram ALDOT [email protected]

46 Joe Kerstetter TNDOT [email protected] 615-350-4193

47 Wan Soo Kim VADOT [email protected]

48 Winson King PennDOT [email protected] 717-783-6716

49 Danielle Kleinhans Concrete Reinforcing Steel Institute [email protected]

50 Brian Korschgen AASHTO [email protected] 202-624-8566

51 David Kotzer CODOT [email protected] 303-398-6566

52 Dave Kuniega PennDOT [email protected] 717-787-3966

53 Henry Lacinak AASHTO [email protected] 225-752-2877

54 Julie Lamberson MoDOT [email protected] 573-751-2847

55 Danny Lane TNDOT [email protected] 615-350-4175

56 Brian Lewis The Euclid Chemical Company [email protected] 216-375-9027

57 George Lian GADOT [email protected]

58 Mike MacDonald PPG Industries [email protected]

59 Katheryn Malusky AASHTO [email protected] 202-624-3695

60 David McKee Plastic Safety Systems [email protected] 216-403-0898

61 Andrew McNair MSDOT [email protected] 601-946-6158

62 Robert Meinzer Contech Engineered Solutions [email protected] 913-940-1451

63 Oak Metcalfe MTDOT [email protected] 406-444-9201

64 Johnnie Miller TXDOT [email protected]

65 Brandi Mitchell KY Transportation Cabinet [email protected] 502-564-3160

66 Shelby Mock Microbac Laboratories, Inc. [email protected] 720-406-4800

67 Willy Morrison American Engineering Testing, Inc. [email protected] 847-902-7548

68 Andrew Mroczkowski CTDOT [email protected] 860-594-3296

69 Matthew Mueller ILDOT [email protected]

70 Richard Mulcahy MADOT [email protected] 617-951-1333

71 Ting Nahrwold INDOT tnahrwold.indot.in.gov

72 Skip Neal Field Lining Systems, Inc. [email protected]

73 Mark Nelson Nelson Testing Laboratories [email protected]

74 Brad Nemunaitis The Euclid Chemical Company [email protected]

75 Randy Pace NCDOT [email protected] 919-329-4200

76 Mike Paipal Five Star Products [email protected]

77 Charles Palmer AR State Highway and Transportation Department [email protected] 501-569-2185

78 Chris Peoples NC DOT [email protected] 919-329-4000

79 Jerry Peterson TXDOT [email protected] 512-506-5821

80 Keith Platte AASHTO [email protected] 202-624-3697

81 Michael Pluimer Crossroads Engineering Services, LLC [email protected] 612-236-8169

82 Joseph Putherickal IADOT [email protected] 515-239-1259

83 Bill Real NHDOT [email protected] 603-271-3151

84 Nikita Reed FLDOT [email protected]

85 Erany Robinson-Perry GADOT [email protected]

86 Brennan Roney GADOT [email protected] 404-608-4816

87 Evan Rothblatt AASHTO [email protected] 202-624-3648

88 Jesus Sandoval-Gil AZ DOT [email protected] 602-712-2592

89 Robert Sarcinella Sarc Engineering & Consulting [email protected] 512-791-5591

90 Greg Schafer Haviland Drainage Products [email protected] 419-576-7204

91 Kenny Seward OKDOT [email protected]

92 Bin Shi UTDOT [email protected] 801-633-6260

93 Temple Short SCDOT [email protected] 803-737-6648

94 Guy Skirpan AzDOT [email protected] 602-206-0447

95 Greta Smith AASHTO [email protected] 202-624-5815

96 John Staton MIDOT [email protected] 517-322-5701

97 Joseph Stilwell MEDOT [email protected] 207-215-3643

98 Paul Sullivan Materials Evaluation Testing Engineer Azdot [email protected] 602-712-8205

99 Jeffrey Syar OHDOT [email protected] 614-275-1373

100 Douglas Todd Contech Engineered Solutions Consultant [email protected] 770-331-6418

101 Jim Trepanier ILDOT [email protected] 217-782-9607

102 Michael Vanantwerp Microbac Laboratories [email protected] 720-406-4800

103 Paul Vinik FLDOT [email protected] 352-955-6649

104 Anita Vuckovska W.R. Meadows, Inc. [email protected] 847-214-2100

105 Robert Wade ADOT [email protected] 602-712-4875

106 Brenda Waters PennDOT [email protected]

107 Terry Williams Thracelinq, Inc. [email protected]

108 Brad Young OHDOT [email protected] 614-351-2882

109 Robert Ziskey Usg [email protected] 248-219-1259

110 Merrill Zwanka SCDOT [email protected] 803-737-6682

National Transportation Product Evaluation Program

AASHTO Product Evaluation List Ross “Oak” Metcalfe, P.E.

Testing Engineer Montana Department of Transportation

& AASHTO Region IV Representative on the APEL Council

What is APEL? (Before)

Presenter
Presentation Notes
The AASHTO Product Evaluation List technical service program was developed to address the requirement of the Code of Federal Regulations – 23 CFR 635.411(a)(2) – as a means to evaluate and post data for innovative and/or proprietary products in order to speed their delivery to market.

What is APEL? (After – More to come…)

Presenter
Presentation Notes
This is a screen shot of the landing page of the new module that is currently under construction. There will be more on this later – Riaz with Iengineering is here and will discuss this shortly…

APEL’s Mission

• Evaluate innovative and/or proprietary materials, products, and devices of common interest for use in highway and bridge construction Develop and carry out new test evaluations Post state certifications and evaluations

Why use APEL?

• APEL Evaluations Member States save time and money Data from independent and credible source Vendors save time and money by having a product

evaluated just once (similar to NTPEP)

Why use APEL?

• State Certifications and Evaluations States can use each others

certifications/evaluations Streamline and possibly eliminate the PIF process 23 CFR 635.411 FHWA-HRT-12-009 http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/construction/cqit/propriet.cfm

Presenter
Presentation Notes
You can use “other” states evaluations or certifications to streamline and possibly eliminate the PIF process called for in CFR. This has been a controversial issue in past due to inconsistent interpretation of FHWA’s guidance by State division offices. There is language on the FHWA website that defines what is a certification and what is an evaluation. FHWA continues to support the listing of state certifications and evaluations so other states can benefit.

Who is APEL?

• AASHTO APEL Coordinator APEL Council Chair APEL Council Vice Chair APEL Council Members

• (At least) One from each of the four AASHTO regions

Presenter
Presentation Notes
APEL is a Technical service program managed under the National Transportation Product Evaluation Program, and is run by the APEL Council. The Council consists of a chair, vice chair, and at least one representative from each of the 4 AASHTO Regions; they are tasked with reviewing all product submittals, including state evaluations, and establishing guidelines for the development of independent evaluation protocols.

APEL Council

APEL Coordinator Evan Rothblatt

(AASHTO)

CHAIR (Vacant)

Region 1 Doug Gayne (ME DOT)

Region 2 Terry Swygert

(SC DOT)

Region 3 Brad Young (OH DOT)

Region 4 Ross “Oak” Metcalfe

(MT DOT)

VICE-CHAIR (Vacant)

Council at Large Rodney Wynn

(MD DOT)

Council at Large Mark Gawedzinski

(IL DOT)

Presenter
Presentation Notes
In addition to that “at least one” rep from each region we now have a few “at large” reps. Not mentioned here is Connecticut, so if anyone out there is interested…we are looking for Materials Engineers to fill the chair/vice chair positions and will consider anyone interested in serving on the council at large.

AASHTO Regions

What is AASHTO’s Role?

• Facilitate the Review Process through the APEL Coordinator Communication Organization Coordination of Testing Reviewing Information Posting Test Results

Role of the Council

• The APEL Council makes the decision to proceed with an evaluation based on: Product application information Best and common interests of the States

Presenter
Presentation Notes
It is the role of the regional representatives to seek comment from the regional states on the viability of any new product submitted.

Product Application

• Standard form designed to capture relevant and important product information to be used as the basis for the Council’s decision.

• Does it fit within the scope of APEL?

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Does it fit? More on that later…

Best Interests of the States

• Are the States interested in using the product? • How would it benefit the States? Does it increase or provide Quality Cost Effectiveness Sustainability Etc…

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Regional council members are tasked with seeking interest from their region’s states.

How Often Does the Council Meet?

• Minimum of once per month • Try to meet the last Wednesday of each month • Meet in person during the Annual NTPEP

meeting • Communication must go through the APEL

Coordinator – no official contact between vendors and the Council or Labs under contract with the Council

What is NOT applicable for APEL?

Products with existing specifications or evaluation programs AASHTO NTPEP States

Products currently under research Products not ready for implementation

Presenter
Presentation Notes
If an item has already been evaluated by a state or independent entity there is no need to re-evaluated it here. APEL is also NOT a research program, these products must be ready for prime time, as they say.

APEL Review Process

• Initial request for product evaluation • Detailed application submittal • Development of SOW for evaluation • Review and posting of evaluation results

o State evaluation or certification

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Vendor summits a request to APEL for consideration of their product or material to be evaluated for possible inclusion into the APEL listing. The APEL coordinator reviews the applications and decides if the product fails to meet the basic acceptance criteria described above. If the product doesn’t meet, the vendor is notified and encouraged to follow other means more appropriate for their product. Please note that the coordinator does not decide whether to test the product or not; the coordinator makes sure the products that go in front of the Council meet the scope of APEL. If the product meets, the coordinator forwards the evaluation request to the Council for review and discussion on the next scheduled teleconference. The council then decides if the product moves to stage 2. There are specific documents, requirements and financial obligations from the vendor at this point if a decision is made to move ahead to stage 2. Once the detailed product application and fees have been received, the coordinator reviews for completeness and forwards the request to the Council for review and discussion at the next teleconference. The council reviews the application and provides basic direction to the coordinator if further questions or information are required, how to proceed in the evaluation of the product, basic variables of interest, laboratory to use, types and duration of tests, etc. With all the relevant details of the test program identified, the coordinator communicates with the laboratory to describe the testing guidelines and obtain a scope of work and cost estimate for testing based on the decisions of the Council. Aside from the cost estimate, the lab provides a detailed breakdown as to what the test regimen entails and the cost of either individual tests or a wholesale value for the entire evaluation. The estimate of cost is given to the vendor in order to provide an opportunity to decide if proceeding with the evaluation is in their best interest. If the vendor confirms participation and payment, the laboratory is asked to proceed. The laboratory may at this point contact the vendor to acquire an appropriate number of product samples. The lab then conducts testing. When the report is received from the testing lab, the results are reviewed by the APEL coordinator for proper content and formatting, and then the report is forwarded to the vendor. The vendor then has the opportunity to decide if they wish to publish the data. If they wish to publish the data, the test report becomes available for review and use by state product coordinators. In certain instances a state may have previously conducted testing on a vendor’s product and certified it for use. In such instances the state may post their certificate as well as the resulting data at any time. If a state has not posted evaluation data, a vendor may submit a request through the APEL module to have the state product coordinator post their certificate to the site. The APEL Council or state product coordinators that review this data may request additional testing or new evaluations to be completed should the previous data/evaluation not meet their required acceptance criteria.

In the Queue… • 7 products in different phases of evaluation • 1 complete evaluation • 3 products pending evaluation • 2 products going through preliminary review • 1 product at the initial phase • 8 States with products listed (AZ, CO, CT,

ME, MD, MT, NY, OH • 54 products total

Where do we go from here???

• New module under development • More products are being proposed • How do we increase State participation? • Are we serving your needs as Member States?

QUESTIONS????

APEL.TRANSPORTATION.ORG

APEL AASHTO Product Evaluation List

May 19, 2015

Outline

Introduction

APEL 2.0

Questions/Feedback

What is APEL?

The APEL program and its online database module have been designed to be a repository for findings from the evaluation and testing of innovative and/or proprietary engineered transportation products.

Through APEL, products that do not currently have an evaluation protocol may be submitted to AASHTO for full development, cost analysis, and execution of an evaluation.

What is APEL?

APEL also provide a listing of new products that have been previously evaluated and certified by the state DOTs through formal laboratory or field test procedures.

APEL is NOT an approved products list, rather it is a source for independent, unbiased data and information from which state product coordinators may determine to use new, innovative products in conformance with the Code of Federal Regulations 23 CFR 635.411 (a)(2).

Existing APEL Web Site

Developed in 2005

APEL 2.0 Login | Contact Us | Help

AASHTO Evaluated Products DOT Evaluated Products State Certified Products

State Certified ProductsDOT Evaluated ProductsAASHTO Evaluated Products

Welcome to the AASHTO Product Evaluation List (APEL) web site. This site provides a repository consisting of findings from the evaluation and testing of new, innovative, and/or proprietary engineered transportation products and materials. The three types of information contained within the site are as follows: AASHTO Evaluated Products, State Evaluated Products, and State Certified Products. It is important to note that APEL is NOT an approved products list, rather it is a source for independent, unbiased data and information from which state product coordinators may determine to use new, innovative products in conformance with the Code of Federal Regulations 23 CFR 635.411 (a)(2).

© American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.444 N Capitol St. NW - Suite 249 - Washington, DC 20001

About AASHTO | Legal Information | Privacy Policy | Copyright Notice | Malfunction Report

Patented or proprietary products deemed essential for synchronization with existing highway facilities, or that do not have an

existing, equally suitable alternate, may be certified by state DOTs. The states may

post their certifications here.

(View all State Certified Products)

Data and information for products that have previously been evaluated by a state

DOT, whether laboratory and/or field tested, may be posted here.

(View all DOT Evaluated Products)

New, innovative products that do not currently have an evaluation protocol can be submitted for accelerated laboratory testing by AASHTO. A protocol will be developed and implemented with a timeframe not to exceed 1 year in

duration. At the conclusion of testing a final report will be posted here.

(View all AASHTO Evaluated Products)

Submit State Certified ProductSubmit DOT Evaluated ProductsSubmit AASHTO Evaluation Request

Total State Certified Products: 234Total DOT Evaluated Products: 587

GO

Home

Total AASHTO Evaluation Requests: 230

230 Submitted

95 In Progress

135 Published

APEL 2.0 Features

AASHTO Evaluated Products

DOT Evaluated Products

State Certified Products

AASHTO Evaluated Products

New, innovative products that do not currently have an evaluation protocol can be submitted for accelerated laboratory testing by AASHTO. A protocol will be developed and implemented with a timeframe not to exceed 1 year in duration. At the conclusion of testing a final report will be posted on the APEL web site.

AASHTO Product Evaluation Process

Step #1: Any manufacturer/vendor can submit request for product evaluation to AASHTO.

Step #2: Product evaluation request will be reviewed by AASHTO and APEL Council.

Step #3: If accepted, AASHTO will contact the manufacturer/vendor to initiate evaluation process.

Step #4: Evaluation progress and results will be posted on the APEL web site.

DOT Evaluated Products

Data and information for products that have previously been evaluated by a state DOT, whether laboratory and/or field tested, may be posted to APEL by the state DOTs.

DOT Product Evaluation Process

Step #1: State DOTs can submit product information and evaluation report of any previously evaluated product to the APEL web site.

Step #2: Product evaluation information will be reviewed by AASHTO.

Step #3: If accepted, the evaluation will be published on the APEL web site.

State Certified Products

Patented or proprietary products deemed essential for synchronization with existing highway facilities, or that do not have an existing, equally suitable alternate, may be certified by state DOTs. The states may post their certifications on the APEL web site.

State Product Certification Process

Step #1: State DOTs can submit product information and evaluation report of any previously certified product to the APEL web site.

Step #2: Product certification information will be reviewed by AASHTO.

Step #3: If accepted, the certification will be published on the APEL web site.

Prototype Demonstration

State Certification Products Process

Visit NTPEP/APEL booth for more information.

State Certified Products

State Certified Products

© American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.444 N Capitol St. NW - Suite 249 - Washington, DC 20001

About AASHTO | Legal Information | Privacy Policy | Copyright Notice | Malfunction Report

Find Products

Submittal Year

2013

More...

2012

Al l

Agency

2015

2014

Product Name

Al l

3M

3M

3M

Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.

Advanced Infrastructure Technologies

Amano McGann, Inc.

Cable Technologies, Inc. (A Tokyo Rope Company)

Manufacturer Evaluation AgencyProduct Name

3M Opticom

Canoga

Series 380/390 Pavement Marking Tape

N-12 HP Storm Pipe

Bridge-in-a-Backpack

GridSmart 360

Parking Access Control

Ohio Department of Transportation

Maryland Department of Transportation

Arizona Department of Transportation

Maine Department of Transportation

Maine Department of Transportation

Maine Department of Transportation

Maine Department of Transportation

There are 2 of 7 product(s) currently selected.

Submit State Certified Product

Area

Al l

Manufacturer

Al l

Category

Al l

Login | Contact Us | Help

AASHTO Evaluated Products DOT Evaluated Products State Certified Products

GO

Home

Global Search

Multi-select Find Attributes

All data columns will be wide enough so that no text is stripped off.

State Certified Product Submission

Submit State Certified Product

© American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.444 N Capitol St. NW - Suite 249 - Washington, DC 20001

About AASHTO | Legal Information | Privacy Policy | Copyright Notice | Malfunction Report

APEL

Next

User Information

Email Address*: Required

?

Cancel

AASHTO Evaluated Products

DOT Evaluated Products

State Certified Products

Submit State Certified Product

Login | Contact Us | Help

AASHTO Evaluated Products DOT Evaluated Products State Certified Products

GO

Home

Presenter
Presentation Notes
State Certified product submission process has been simplified. User email address domain will be verified. If domain of the email address matches AASHTO member domain, then system will allow application submission. Otherwise, a message will be displayed that the submitting is only allowed to AASHTO members.

State Certified Product Submission (Cont.)

Submit State Certified Product

© American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.444 N Capitol St. NW - Suite 249 - Washington, DC 20001

About AASHTO | Legal Information | Privacy Policy | Copyright Notice | Malfunction Report

Submit

User Information

User Name*:

[email protected] Address*:

?

Product Information

Manufacturer*:

Product*:

Product Description:

?

Category*:

Add New Manufacturer

Adhesives and Bonding Agents

Asphalt Mixes and Additives

Asphalt Surface Treatments

Barriers Fencing and Roadside Structures

Intended Use:

Select Category

Select Manufacturer

Cancel

Attach File(s):

3M Opticom 2013-01-09.pdf

3M Opticom 2013-01-16.pdf

Upload

Evaluation Agency

Agency*:

?

Select Agency

Login | Contact Us | Help

AASHTO Evaluated Products DOT Evaluated Products State Certified Products

GO

Home

APEL

AASHTO Evaluated Products

DOT Evaluated Products

State Certified Products

Submit State Certified Product

Attaching documents

Add new Manufacturer

Presenter
Presentation Notes
User can select from existing manufactures or can add new manufacturer. User can attached multiple documents with the application. On successful submission of the certified product, confirmation email will be send to the submitter and application goes to AASHTO for processing and approval.

State Certified Product Information

State Certified Products

© American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.444 N Capitol St. NW - Suite 249 - Washington, DC 20001

About AASHTO | Legal Information | Privacy Policy | Copyright Notice | Malfunction Report

Find Products

Select Product Canoga

Manufacturer Name: 3M

Product Name: Canoga

Product Description: Loop amplifiers/detectors

Intended Use:

Category (ies): Traffic Control Devices - Loop Detectors

Date Added: 4/30/2014

Product Information

There are 2 of 7 product(s) currently selected.

Product Details

Canogo will be used for the following pruposes:1) To environmentally track the inductance of a loop detector (i.e. cold to warm to cold pavements as a the result of thermal heating / rain and snow) of thermal heating / rain and snow) 2) To calibrate the units based upon actual ?t inductance change values rather the percentage of change to ?t values (i.e. the amplifiers can detect small mass vehicles such as motorcycles with 1,000’ lead-in cables)

3) The ability to operate our non-invasive micro-loop detector devices that are currently deployed in the field as upstream / advance detection

Certification Status: Product Certified

Tracking Number: MD-2014-0003

Agency: Maryland Department of Transportation

Area: Traffic Safety

Basis of Approval: Synchronization

Extent: Statewide

Submittal Date: 3/15/2013

Approval Date: 3/20/2013

Expiration Date: 3/15/2016

Attachment(s): 3M Canoga.pdf

Comments:

Certification Status

Please refer to attachment provided. If you have any questions or need further information, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Michael L. Paylor, P.E., Chief, Traffic Engineering Design Division (TEDD), SHA at 410-787-7697, toll free 1-888-963-0307 or via email at [email protected].

Submittal Year

2013

More...

2012

Al l

Agency

2015

2014

Product Name

Al l

Area

Al l

Manufacturer

Al l

Category

Al l

Login | Contact Us | Help

AASHTO Evaluated Products DOT Evaluated Products State Certified Products

GO

Home

Navigate to different products

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Detail page will provide all information on a single.

Search

Search will be powered by Google Search Appliance

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Global search will be implemented using GSA.

Schedule

Design

Spring 2015 Development

Summer 2015

Testing

Summer 2015 AASHTO will test APEL web site.

Deployment

Summer 2015

Comments and Feedback

For more information/feedback/suggestions, please contact: Evan Rothblatt ([email protected])

Riaz Ahmad ([email protected])