aappppeennddiixx ff ppuubblliicc iinnvvoollvveemmeenntt ... f … · provide guidance in planning...

AAAppppppeeennndddiiixxx FFF PPPuuubbbllliiiccc IIInnnvvvooolllvvveeemmmeeennnttt aaannnddd RRRuuunnnwwwaaayyy

EEExxxttteeennnsssiiiooonnn LLLeeetttttteeerrrsss

SOUTHWEST DISTRICTCITIZENS PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE

NOTICEThe Southwest CPAC 2005

meeting dates, times and locations are as follows:*

Monday, January 10, 2005, following the Mayor’s Town Hall meeting at Forrest High School

Monday, February 14, 2005, 7 p.m. at FCCJ Kent Campus

Monday, March 14, 2005, 7 p.m. at FCCJ Kent Campus

Monday, April 11, 2005, 7 p.m. at Forrest High School

Monday, May 9, 2005, 7 p.m. at FCCJ Kent Campus

Monday, June 13, 2005, 7 p.m. at FCCJ Kent Campus

Monday, July 11, 2005, 7 p.m. at Forrest High School

Monday, August 8, 2005, 7 p.m. at FCCJ Kent Campus

Monday, September 12, 2005, 7 p.m. at FCCJ Kent Campus

Monday, October 10, 2005, 7 p.m. at Forrest High School

Monday, November 14, 2005, 7 p.m. at FCCJ Kent Campus

Monday, December 12, 2005, 7 p.m. at FCCJ Kent Campus

*These dates are subject to change at the discretion of the CPAC.

AGENDA

Herlong Airport Master Plan Update Herlong Airport Technical Advisory Committee Meeting April 10, 2006 4:30 p.m.

Introduction Project Status

Demand/Capacity and Facility Requirements Airport Capacity and Delay Design Aircraft and Runway Requirements Airfield Facility Requirements General Aviation Facilities Airport Support Facilities

Airport Alternatives Analysis Airfield Development Concepts Land Use Considerations Landside Development Concepts

Questions and Next Steps Questions Address Comments on Working Papers 2 and 3 FAA Review of Forecasts Refinement of Airport Development Options Submit Working Paper 4 (Refined Alternatives) for Review

Additional Information: Phil Jufko and Tricia Fantinato of the LPA GROUP INCORPORATED will make a presentation on the airport master plan project, including key aspects associated with the Facility Requirements and Alternatives Development phases of the study.

AGENDA

Herlong Airport Master Plan Update Project “Kick-Off” Meeting June 21, 2005 1:30 p.m. Jacksonville Airport Authority Offices, Herlong Air port Attendees: See Attendee List

Introduction Goals and Objectives of Study Master Planning Process Deliverables

Project Schedule Dates for Deliverables: - Internal Review - 2 week before TAC Meeting -2 weeks following TAC Meeting for comments Technical Advisory Committee Members JAA Airport Contacts and Coordination Meetings Public Advisory Meetings FAA Internal Review

Inventory and Existing Conditions On-Airport Contact Local Business Information Chamber of Commerce Information Historical aircraft operations, based aircraft, fleet mix, etc. Financial Data, etc

Questions?

1

AGENDA

Herlong Airport Master Plan Update Technical Advisory Meeting September 13, 2006 4:00 p.m.

Introduction Project Status

Airport Issues Overview of Key Airport Issues

Refined Airport Alternatives Areas of Interest Recommended Development Alternatives Recommended Development Concept, including:

• Airport Land Use • Environmental Impacts • Airport Noise • Flight Patterns, and • Support Facilities

Capital Improvement Program and Cost Estimates Recommended Projects Project Phasing Cost Estimates per Project and Phase

Financial Plan Existing Airport Revenues and Expenses Overview of Cash Flow Analysis

Draft Airport Layout Plan Overview of Set, including:

• Airport Layout Plan • Terminal Drawing • Inner Approach Surface Drawings • Airspace Drawing • Airport Land Use, and • Airport Property Map

2

AGENDA

Herlong Airport Master Plan Update Technical Advisory Meeting September 13, 2006 4:00 p.m.

Questions and Next Steps Questions Address Comments on:

• Refined Alternatives • Capital Improvement Program • Financial Plan, and • Draft ALP and Report

Tentative Submittal of Draft Report to FAA and FDOT for Review

Additional Information: Phil Jufko of the LPA GROUP INCORPORATED will make a 30-minute presentation on airport master plan project, including key aspects associated with airport recommended development.

1

Master Plan UpdateHerlong Airport

Technical Advisory Committee Meeting

September 14, 2005

Goals & Objectives

Community leaders providing input into long-range planning for aviation authority consideration.

Intended as a forum to freely present issues, ideas, and provide guidance in planning for future aviation facilities.

Provide diverse representation of community interests and opinions relative to airport development to address all issues of concern to the community and region.

Provide input related to aviation, community, political, planning & legal issues.

Provide a linkage to various groups that committee members have been drawn from and to the larger community as a whole.

What is a Master Plan?

Projection of the Airport’s ultimate growth over a 20-year timeframe.

Plan for the ultimate development of physical facilities.

Development guide, including timing and costs, that considers adjacent land uses and environmental issues.

Step-by-step description of the logic used in formulating the plan.

Display of the plan in graphical and written form.

Positions the Airport to compete for FAA and FDOT funding (up to 95%).

Master Plan Process

Inventory

Aviation Activity Forecasts

Airfield Capacity Analysis

Facility Requirements Analysis

Airport Alternatives Analysis

Airport Layout Plans

Financial Plan/Capital Improvement ProgramPublic Involvement

Advisory Committee MeetingsAirport Authority MeetingsPublic MeetingCoordination MeetingsBriefings to JAA

Existing Conditions

Combination civilian/military airspace: Class E, overlapping Classes C & D; MOAsNon-precision instrument approachesEast/west apron: accommodate 92 aircraftFBO terminal: renovated in 2001

Runway 7-25Primary runway: 4,000 ft x 150 ftARC B-II design designation; good condition

Runway 11-29Secondary/crosswind runway: 3,501 ft x 100 ftARC B-II design designation; visual approach only; good condition

Existing Conditions, Cont’d

***Insert figure or graph, pending Chapter 2 Update***

Existing AirfieldExisting Airfield

2

Existing Conditions: Issues

Automobile parkingSurface access: ground transportationDense, overlapping airspaceTurf runwayUtilities

SecurityPerimeter and Airside

Diverse Aircraft Type ActivityPrompts Need for Control Tower to Control Ground and Air Movement

Historical Aviation Activity

Significant growth in number of based aircraft

Increasing varietygrowth in recreational based aircraft

Operations AAGRItinerant: 1.71%Local: 1.46%

2004/2005 Historical Based Aircraft by Aircraft Classification

1

0

15

54

125

120

Single EngineMulti-EngineJet-EngineHelicopterGliderUltralightSeaplaneMilitary


1

0

15

54

125

120


0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

Num

ber o

f O

pera

tions

Operation

2004/2005 Aircraft Operations

2004

2005

2004 39,900 32,528 2,573 0

2005 40,877 33,459 2,500 0

Local GA Itinerant Military Air Taxi

Purpose of Forecasting

To develop a realistic assessment of market conditions and market performance.

To address unique local conditions not fully considered in national, macro level forecast efforts.

To provide a benchmark for comparing current facilities against a reasonable estimate of future demand to define potential future facility needs.

Consider the current recession coupled with the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 and their impacts well into the future.

Forecast Methodology

Market share approach was used

Calculations were made to determine what has historically been the airport’s contribution to the nation’s GA activity.

These rates were then applied with the FAA’s national forecasts to project the anticipated level of GA operations for the planning period.

The resulting level of GA activity reflects a positive growth rate.

Aviation Forecasts

1.46%56,44352,49748,82745,41442,239Local GA

-0.43%2,5002,5002,5002,5002,723Military

1.85%49,65346,18242,95339,95134,434Itinerant GA

OPERATIONSOPERATIONS

1.50%218202188174162Based Aircraft

0%00000Air Taxi

Average Annual Growth

Rate

20252020201520102005

Base YearBase Year

3

Aviation Forecast: GA Operations

0

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

100,000

120,000

Forecast Year

# of

Ope

ratio

ns Local GAItinerant GAMilitaryTotal Total

Local GA 42,239 45,414 48,327 52,497 56,443

Itinerant GA 34,424 39,951 42,953 46,182 49,653

Military 2,723 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500

Total 79,386 87,865 93,780 101,179 108,596

2005 2010 2015 2020 2025

Next Steps

Address comments on Working Paper 1Refinement of Forecasts/FAA Review

Airfield Capacity and Facility Requirements AnalysesTAC meeting to review results of Working Paper 2Airport Alternatives AnalysisAirport Plans SetFinancial Plan/Capital Improvement Program

Question & AnswerForum

Project Schedule

Inventory & Forecast – 3 monthsCapacity & Facility Requirements – 2 monthsAlternatives Analysis – 4 monthsFinancial Plan – 2 monthsAirport Layout Plan and Report – 3 monthsAgency Review (FAA/FDOT) – 3 months

1

What is a Master Plan?What is a Master Plan?













Master Plan ProcessMaster Plan Process

Inventory








Inventory








Existing ConditionsExisting Conditions

Combination civilian/military airspace: Class E, overlapping Classes C & D; Special Use AirspaceNon-precision instrument approachesEast/West apron: accommodate 92 aircraftFBO terminal: renovated in 2001



Combination civilian/military airspace: Class E, overlapping Classes C & D; Special Use AirspaceNon-precision instrument approachesEast/West apron: accommodate 92 aircraftFBO terminal: renovated in 2001



Existing Conditions: IssuesExisting Conditions: Issues



Diverse Aircraft Type ActivityRunway length requirementsNavigational Aids, andPotential demand for ATC related to diverse Ground and Air Movement



Diverse Aircraft Type ActivityRunway length requirementsNavigational Aids, andPotential demand for ATC related to diverse Ground and Air Movement

Historical Aviation ActivityHistorical Aviation Activity








1

0

15

54

125

120



1

0

15

54

125

120


0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

Num

ber o

f O

pera

tions

Operation

2004/2005 Aircraft Operations

2004

2005

2004 39,900 32,528 2,573 0

2005 40,877 33,459 2,500 0

Local GA Itinerant Military Air Taxi

2

Purpose of ForecastingPurpose of Forecasting









Forecast MethodologyForecast Methodology









Approved Aviation ForecastApproved Aviation Forecast

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

70,000

80,000

90,000

Ann

ual O

pera

tions

MilitaryItinerant GALocal GATotal Operations

Military 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000

Itinerant GA 28,321 31,336 33,147 35,063 37,089

Local GA 34,740 35,622 37,680 39,858 42,161

Total Operations 65,300 68,958 72,828 76,921 81,251

2005 2010 2015 2020 2025

Demand/CapacityDemand/Capacity

20052010

20152020

2025

0

50,000

100,000

150,000

200,000

250,000

Ann

ual O

pera

tions

Year

ASV

60% ASV

Forecast Operations

Annual Service Volume (ASV)Weighted hourly capacity of 116 operations204,128 operationsForecast operations will not exceed ASV during planning period

Annual Service Volume (ASV)Weighted hourly capacity of 116 operations204,128 operationsForecast operations will not exceed ASV during planning period

40%81,251122,477204,1282025

38%76,921122,477204,1282020

36%72,828122,477204,1282015

34%68,958122,477204,1282010

32%65,300122,477204,1282005

% of ASVDemand60% ASVASVYear

Runway Length AnalysisRunway Length Analysis

Runway LengthExtension needed to accommodate larger aircraftAirport elevation, temperature adjustment, maximum takeoff weight (MTOW) and pavement condition variables used

SATSVery light jet (VLJ) aircraft

Fleet MixExpected to change with larger jet presenceExtension minimizes larger aircraft payload penalties

Runway LengthExtension needed to accommodate larger aircraftAirport elevation, temperature adjustment, maximum takeoff weight (MTOW) and pavement condition variables used

SATSVery light jet (VLJ) aircraft

Fleet MixExpected to change with larger jet presenceExtension minimizes larger aircraft payload penalties

Eclipse 500

Runway Length RequirementsRunway Length Requirements

Data of Aircraft Manufacturer Runway Length Recommendation comes from the aircraft manufacturer’s website and published manuals.

1 Maximum Allowable Takeoff Weight (MTW) comes from the manufacturer’s website or published manuals.2. The recommended runway length is for aircraft at MTW at standard ISA, at sea level.3. Runway length was determined by adjusting the manufacturer’s recommended runway length for the

elevation (increased by 0.08%) and temperature (21.16%) at HEG.4. Wet runway length was calculated by applying a 15% increase to the calculated runway length

4,9014,2623,51513,500SJ30-2

3,9603,4432,8407,394TBM 850

6,0655,2744,35016204Jetstream 31

4,4343,8553,18016,300Citation Ultra

4,1693,6252,99013,500Citation II

4,7604,1393,41418,700Citation Excel

4,2943,7343,08010,400Citation Jet (CJ1/CJ2)

5,2874,5973,79212,500Premier Jet

4,5733,9773,28016,500Learjet 31A

7,1366,2055,11815,000Learjet 25

5,9955,213430013,500Learjet 24

5,6824,941407518,740Learjet 28/29

6,2045,3954,45018,740Falcon 10

5,8135,0544,16916,100Beech jet 400

Wet Runway Length

Requirement4

Calculated Runway Length Requirement3

Manufacturer’s Runway Length

Recommendation2MTW1Aircraft

CALCULATED AIRCRAFT LENGTH REQUIREMENTS

Cessna 525 Cessna 525 CitationJetCitationJet

Cessna 550 Citation IICessna 550 Citation IISino Swearingen SJ30-2

3

Facility RequirementsFacility RequirementsRunway and Taxiway Improvements• Extend Rwy 7-25 to at least 4,500 feet• Install Runway overruns of Runway 7-25• Construct new turf runway• Re-surface/re-mark closed runways as taxiways• Re-surface/re-mark Runway 11-29• Extend Taxiway C to approach end of 7-25• Extend Taxiway A to full parallel with 7-25• Install MITL on closed runways and Taxiways A & C

Other Airfield Needs:• Install precision instrument approach •Construct new access road entrance•Rehabilitate airfield signage•Relocate or install additional electrical vault•Upgrade security fencing•Install utilities on the east side and south side of the airfield•Construct additional automobile parking adjacent to Terminal

General Aviation Needs•Construct at least 35 T-hangar units•Construct at least 28,333 SY of Apron•Construct additional Aircraft Maintenance Hangar•Provide glider and experimental aircraft facilitiesAdjacent to Turf Runway

Alternatives AnalysisAlternatives Analysis

Airfield Concept 1:“Limited Development” Scenario

Airfield Concept 1:“Limited Development” Scenario

• Most cost effective• No impacts to existing

facilities or environment• Improved aircraft access

to south airfield

StrengthsStrengths

• Accommodates ARC B-II aircraft only

• No capacity increases for larger aircraft

• No access improvement to Runways 7-25 and 11-29

WeaknessesWeaknesses

Airfield Concept 2: “Runway Extension” Scenario

Airfield Concept 2: “Runway Extension” Scenario

• Requires realignment of perimeter road

• Requires relocation of Runway 7 PAPIs

• Significant cost• Requires replacement of MIRL

with HIRL on Runway 7-25• Requires installation of

utilities on south side to accommodate taxiway lighting


• Provides required length of 4,500 feet

• Accommodates ARC C-II aircraft

• Provides precision and non-precision approach

• Provides full runway access, avoiding back taxiing

• Improved aircraft access to southern quadrant of airfield

StrengthsStrengths

Airfield Concept 3:“Runway Ext. with Overruns” Scenario

Airfield Concept 3:“Runway Ext. with Overruns” Scenario

• Accommodates C-II critical aircraft

• Accommodates runway length requirements during standard and poor weather conditions

• Provides Turf Runway• Provides precision and non-

precision approach• No property acquisition required• Taxiway access to southern

portion of airfield • Provides full runway access,

avoiding back taxiing• Improved aircraft access to

southern quadrant of airfield

StrengthsStrengths

• Highest cost alternative• Requires environmental

assessment• Requires relocation of PAPIs• Requires significant pavement

removal and rehabilitation• Requires roadway realignment • Requires installation of utilities

on south side of airfield


Airfield Alternative Analysis MatrixAirfield Alternative Analysis Matrix

$7.4 million$6.3 million$1.6 millionOrder of Magnitude Cost

Expect full community and airport user acceptance

Expect community and partial user acceptance

Expect partial community acceptance since doesn’t meet needs of users

Community Recommendations/Acceptance

Significant cost, but allows for the greatest growth potential.

Significant cost, but allows for growth.

Airport Opportunity Costs LimitedFiscal Effects

Minor impacts to on-airport wetland associated with Turf Runway development

No ImpactNo ImpactEnvironmental Impacts

Accommodates existing and future critical aircraft; improves airfield capacity beyond the 20-year planning period; & provides additional margin of safety

Accommodates critical aircraft & improves airfield capacity

Short and long-term capacity affectedOperational Performance

Limited on-airport impact; development based upon demand; no land acquisition required

Limited on-airport impact; development based upon demand; no land acquisition required

Limited on-airport impact & no land acquisition required

Phasing/Construction

Provides the greatest opportunity & meets user needs

Allows for growth, but doesn’t fully satisfy user needs

Growth Limited & doesn’t satisfy user needsTotal Growth Potential

Concept 3Concept 2Concept 1Airfield Evaluation Criteria

4

North Landside Development:Concept I

North Landside Development:Concept I

• Does not meet long-term T-hangar demand

• Does not meet corporate hangar demand

• No land acquisition required• Provides mix of facilities for

aircraft hangar storage• Provides adequate automobile

parking and aircraft tie-down and ramp space


StrengthsStrengths

North Landside Development:Concept II

North Landside Development:Concept II

• Does not meet clear span hangar and maintenance hangar demand

• No land acquisition required

• Provides mix of facilities for aircraft hangar storage

• Provides adequate automobile parking and aircraft apron space

• Exceeds T-Hangar demand over long-term


StrengthsStrengths

North Landside Development:Concept III

North Landside Development:Concept III

• Does not meet long-term T-hangar demand

• Limited corporate and conventional hangar development

• No land acquisition required

• Provides mix of facilities for aircraft hangar storage

• Provides adequate automobile parking and aircraft ramp space

• Does not require wetland mitigation


StrengthsStrengths

East Commerce Park DevelopmentEast Commerce Park Development

• No utilities (electricity, sewer, water, etc)

• Access road and facilities will need to be developed

• No land acquisition required• Provides mix of facilities (office

buildings, hotels, restaurants, etc.) for revenue diversification

• Provides development opportunities

• Provides buffer between airport and community


StrengthsStrengths

Mid-Field GA Development:Concept I

Mid-Field GA Development:Concept I

• Likely requires stormwater retention facilities

• No utilities (electricity, sewer, water, etc)

• May require wetland mitigation• Significant cost for development

• No land acquisition required• Provides mix of aircraft storage

facilities• Exceeds automobile parking, hangar

and apron space requirements• Exceeds corporate and conventional

hangar demand • Provides additional FBO or

maintenance facility


StrengthsStrengths

Mid-Field GA Development:Concept II

Mid-Field GA Development:Concept II

• Likely requires stormwater retention facilities

• May require wetland mitigation• No utilities (electricity, sewer,

water, etc)• Estimated Cost: ~$13.7 million

• No land acquisition required• Provides mix of facilities for aircraft

hangar storage• Exceeds automobile parking,

hangar and apron space requirements

• Exceeds corporate and conventional hangar demand

• Provides additional FBO or maintenance facility


StrengthsStrengths

5

South Development: Concept I “Industrial/Commerce Park”

South Development: Concept I “Industrial/Commerce Park”

• Significant initial cost• Utilities need to be provided• Potential issues in

preventing unauthorized access to airside

• Requires additional fencing• Requires wetland mitigation• Requires perimeter road

expansion and realignment

• Additional source of on-going revenue

• Utilizes existing property• Buffer between airport and

off-airport development• May attract aviation and

non-aviation businesses


StrengthsStrengths

South Development:Concept II “Residential Fly-In”

South Development:Concept II “Residential Fly-In”

• Decreases available property• Requires fence line

relocation• Requires perimeter road

relocation• No additional revenue

streams after sale of property• Requires installation of

additional gates

• Sale of land provides influx of cash for on-airport improvements

• Residents will support on-airport facilities


StrengthsStrengths

Recommended Development PlanRecommended Development Plan

East Commerce/Industrial Development

South Commerce/Industrial Development

Mid-Field Hangar, FBO, Apron Development

Turf Runway

North GA Hangar Development

South Access Road

Lengthened Runway 7

Recommended North GA AlternativeRecommended North GA Alternative

Recommended Mid-Field AlternativeRecommended Mid-Field Alternative Recommended South GA AlternativeRecommended South GA Alternative

6

Next StepsNext Steps

Refine Airport Alternatives

Develop Airport Layout Plan Set

Develop Financial Plan/Capital Improvement Program

Submit Final Master Plan Update to FAA/FDOT for Review

Refine Airport Alternatives

Develop Airport Layout Plan Set

Develop Financial Plan/Capital Improvement Program

Submit Final Master Plan Update to FAA/FDOT for Review

Question & Answer ForumQuestion & Answer Forum

aappppeennddiixx ff ppuubblliicc iinnvvoollvveemmeenntt ... f … · provide guidance in planning...

Documents