aakash mankaney ciuffetti laboratory department of botany and plant pathology

18
Characterization of ROS production and cell wall modifications induced by the host-selective toxins of Pyrenophora tritici-repentis Ptr ToxA and Ptr ToxB Aakash Mankaney Ciuffetti Laboratory Department of Botany and Plant Pathology Oregon State University

Upload: ahava

Post on 24-Feb-2016

61 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Characterization of ROS production and cell wall modifications induced by the host-selective toxins of Pyrenophora tritici-repentis Ptr ToxA and Ptr ToxB. Aakash Mankaney Ciuffetti Laboratory Department of Botany and Plant Pathology Oregon State University. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Aakash Mankaney Ciuffetti Laboratory Department of Botany and Plant Pathology

Characterization of ROS production and cell wall modifications induced by the host-selective toxins of

Pyrenophora tritici-repentis Ptr ToxA and Ptr ToxB

Aakash Mankaney

Ciuffetti LaboratoryDepartment of Botany and Plant Pathology

Oregon State University

Page 2: Aakash Mankaney Ciuffetti Laboratory Department of Botany and Plant Pathology

Pyrenophera-tritici repentis (Ptr)

• Plant fungal pathogen

• Causal agent of tan spot disease of wheat

• Responsible for destruction of 2% to 40% of wheat crop

• Produces host-selective toxins (HSTs)

Page 3: Aakash Mankaney Ciuffetti Laboratory Department of Botany and Plant Pathology

Host-selective toxins

• HSTs are defined as a group of metabolites produced only by fungal pathogens

• Function as essential determinants of pathogenicity • In toxin sensitive plants, HSTs produce disease symptoms

in absence of pathogen that produces them

• Understanding the mode-of-action of HSTs will contribute towards designing strategies to prevent tan spot disease of wheat

Page 4: Aakash Mankaney Ciuffetti Laboratory Department of Botany and Plant Pathology

Ptr ToxA (ToxA) and Ptr ToxB (ToxB)

• ToxA and ToxB are two proteinaceous HSTs isolated from P. tritici-repentis

• ToxA and ToxB can be heterologously expressed in Escherichia coli and Pichia pastoris, respectively

• ToxA necrosis (cell death)ToxB chlorosis (breakdown of chlorophyll)

Ptr ToxA

Sensitive

Insensitive

Ptr ToxB

Page 5: Aakash Mankaney Ciuffetti Laboratory Department of Botany and Plant Pathology

Mode-of-action of Ptr ToxA

• Internalizes in ToxA sensitive mesophyll cells

• Localizes to the chloroplast • Light dependent

• Disruption of photosynthesis

• Accumulation of high levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS)

R G D

Page 6: Aakash Mankaney Ciuffetti Laboratory Department of Botany and Plant Pathology

Reactive Oxygen Species

Hydrogen Peroxide – H2O2 Superoxide – O2- OH- attacking DNA

• Highly reactive due to unpaired valence electron

• Bi-product of several metabolic pathways

• Often produced in stressful environment

• Targeted by anti-oxidants

Page 7: Aakash Mankaney Ciuffetti Laboratory Department of Botany and Plant Pathology

Does ToxB treatment induce the production of ROS in the sensitive cultivar?

• Requires light for symptom development

• ToxB is involved in photooxidation of chlorophyll, affecting its function

• We hypothesize that Ptr ToxB will increase the cellular levels of ROS

Page 8: Aakash Mankaney Ciuffetti Laboratory Department of Botany and Plant Pathology

Objectives

• Determine if ToxB induces production of ROS in a sensitive wheat cultivar

• Compare the effect of ToxA and ToxB on basic plant defense responses on sensitive and insensitive wheat cultivars– Production of phenolic compounds

Page 9: Aakash Mankaney Ciuffetti Laboratory Department of Botany and Plant Pathology

ROS Detection Procedure

Infiltration Centrifugation Freeze using N2

Measurement of fluorescence

• After N2 treatment, the leaf tissue is ground and suspended in Tris-HCl

• After centrifugation, supernatant is removed and H2DCFDA is added

• H2DCFDA fluoresces in the presence of ROS

H2DCFDA DCF

ROS

Page 10: Aakash Mankaney Ciuffetti Laboratory Department of Botany and Plant Pathology

No Treatment Water ToxA ToxB0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

0.17 0.11

2.7

0.98

ROS Production vs. Treatments

Rela

tive

Fluo

resc

ence

Uni

ts

ROS Quantification

• Sensitive wheat leaves infiltrated by water and no treatment produce roughly the same level of ROS

• Sensitive wheat leaves incubated with ToxA produce more ROS after 48 hours than sensitive wheat leaves incubated with ToxB

Page 11: Aakash Mankaney Ciuffetti Laboratory Department of Botany and Plant Pathology

ROS Visualization using Nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT)

Infiltration NBT Staining Chlorophyll Extraction Visualization

• NBT forms a blue, formazen deposit when oxidized

• The blue deposit is viewed under a microscope

• NBT is oxidized by O2-

NBT

Page 12: Aakash Mankaney Ciuffetti Laboratory Department of Botany and Plant Pathology

ToxB H2O

Sensitive

Insensitive

ROS Visualization using NBT

• Only the ToxB treated leaves contain formazan deposits

• ToxB treated sensitive leaves contain more formazan deposits than ToxB treated insensitive leaves

• Leaves treated with ToxB produce ROS-Sensitive leaves produce greater amounts of ROS

Page 13: Aakash Mankaney Ciuffetti Laboratory Department of Botany and Plant Pathology

Objectives

1. To determine whether the accumulation of reactive oxygen species plays a role in the mode-of-action of ToxB– ROS include H2O2, O2

-, OH

2. To compare the effect of ToxA and ToxB on basic plant defense responses on sensitive and insensitive wheat cultivars– Production of phenolic compounds

Page 14: Aakash Mankaney Ciuffetti Laboratory Department of Botany and Plant Pathology

Phenolic Compounds

• Phenolic compounds are secondary metabolites consisting of a hydroxyl group bonded to an aromatic hydrocarbon

• Accumulation of phenolics is a typical response to plant pathogens

• Phenolics are precursors to structural barriers

• Activate plant defense genes

• Include tyrosine, capsaicin, flavonoids and tannins

– Flavonoids, tannins, hydroxycinnamate

Page 15: Aakash Mankaney Ciuffetti Laboratory Department of Botany and Plant Pathology

Extraction and quantification of phenolic compounds

Infiltration Centrifugation Freeze using N2

Absorbtion at 725 nm

• After N2 treatment, the leaf tissue is ground and suspended in 50% CH3OH

• After centrifugation, supernatant is removed and mixed with the Folin-Ciocalteau reagent

• After 20 minutes incubation, the absorption is measured at 725 nm, and total phenolics are quantified

Page 16: Aakash Mankaney Ciuffetti Laboratory Department of Botany and Plant Pathology

Quantification of free phenolic compounds in ToxA and ToxB treated plants

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2Quantification of free phenolics in toxin sensitive (Katepwa) and insensitive (Auburn) wheat cultivars

Tota

l phe

nolic

s (u

g p-

coum

aric

aci

d pe

r m

g of

fres

h w

eigh

t)

S I S I S I IIIS S SToxB ToxBWater WaterToxA ToxA

• Only leaves treated with ToxA produced phenolic compounds 24 hours after treatment

• Leaves incubated with ToxB do not produce a significant level of phenolics at 24 hours, however production is greater at 48 hours

• ToxA produced phenolics at a higher rate than ToxB

24 hours 48 hours

Page 17: Aakash Mankaney Ciuffetti Laboratory Department of Botany and Plant Pathology

Conclusions

• Leaves treated with ToxB produce ROS-Sensitive leaves produce greater amounts of ROS

• Both ToxA and ToxB induce production of phenolic compounds in sensitive wheat cultivars

• Sensitive leaves incubated with ToxA produce phenolic compounds at a faster rate than ToxB

• Phenolic production is greater in sensitive wheat cultivars at 48 hours of incubation verses 24 hours incubation

Page 18: Aakash Mankaney Ciuffetti Laboratory Department of Botany and Plant Pathology

Dr. Kevin Ahern University Honors CollegeHHMI committee Dr. Lynda CiuffettiDr. Melania BettsDr. Iovanna PandelovaViola Manning

Acknowledgements