aac in the icu: critical issues and preliminary research mary beth happ, ph.d., r.n. kathryn...
TRANSCRIPT
AAC in the ICU:AAC in the ICU: Critical Issues and Critical Issues and
Preliminary ResearchPreliminary ResearchMary Beth Happ, Ph.D., R.N.
Kathryn Garrett, Ph.D., CCC-SLP
Tricia Roesch, B.S.N., R.N.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
School of Nursing University of Pittsburgh
Duquesne University, Pittsburgh PA
ASHA Convention November 2003 Chicago
OverviewOverview Part I: Literature Review Part II: Feasibility study of electronic VOCAs in the Surgical Otolaryngology
Unit and Case Example Part III: Feasibility study of electronic VOCAs in the Medical Intensive Care Unit Part IV: NIH-funded Intervention Study --
The SPEACS Project
Note:Note:
• Please refer to the Microsoft Word document by the same title for a narrative version of this presentation
• The Word document will also contain the reference list.
Descriptive reports of the Descriptive reports of the mechanical ventilation experience mechanical ventilation experience
in the ICUin the ICU
• Patients experience:• FEAR• PANIC • STRESS
• As a result of the inability to speak
Nurse-Patient communication in ICU: Brief (< 5 min), task-oriented, commands &
reassurances during physical care.
ICU interactions do NOT usually involve communication of the patient’s ideas, patient’s initiation of messages or elaboration.
Communication difficulty with mechanically ventilated (MV) patients - related to illness severity, anger
(Menzel, 1998)
Greater difficulty communicating with family than with nurses (Menzel, 1998)
Under-recognition & high levels of pain reported in MV patients (SUPPORT studies)
RNs/MDs more likely to communicate with patients who are more responsive.
Statement of the Problem
Few data-based communication intervention studies with acutely/critically ill adults have been published
(Dowden et al, 1986; Stovsky et al, 1988)
Alphabet & picture boards preferred by a critical care survivors (n=5) (Fried-Oken et al, 1991)
Clinical case reports
Introducing AAC preoperatively & word banking (Costello, 2000)
Multidisciplinary post-operative AAC plans for head and neck cancer patients (Fox & Rau, 2001)
Descriptions of AAC use in ICU (Fried-Oken, 2001)
A need exists for:A need exists for:• Specific data on communication
interventions for nonspeaking, intensive care unit patients
• Analysis of high tech versus low tech interventions
• Perceptual, qualitative, and quantitative analyses
• Comparisons between different ICU populations
• Usage data as well as interactional data
PurposePurposeExplore the feasibility of electronic
voice output communication aids (VOCAs) for use with nonvocal patients
(1) in a medical ICU and
(2) following head-neck cancer surgery.
What are the …What are the …
Patient characteristics (illness severity, neuromotor ability)
Usage patterns (message categories, frequency, assistance required)
Communication quality (ease, satisfaction)
Barriers to communication
…when VOCAs are used by when VOCAs are used by hospitalized adultshospitalized adults?
Complementary DesignComplementary Design
QUAL + quanQUAL + quan
No hypothesesNo hypotheses
Purposive-theoretical samplingPurposive-theoretical sampling
Morgan, 1998
Small samplesSmall samples
Settings: University of Pittsburgh Medical CenterUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center
- Otolaryngology surgical unit- Medical ICU – 20 beds
Entry Criteria:• Respiratory intubation Respiratory intubation • Responsive to verbal stimuliResponsive to verbal stimuli• Follows commands consistentlyFollows commands consistently• Initial Cognitive-Linguistic ScreenInitial Cognitive-Linguistic Screen**
* Dowden, Honsinger & Beukelman, 1986
Education & Set-UpEducation & Set-Up
Nurse Inservice (15 min) Patient Instruction (20 min) +
reinforcement Message Inventories
• What does he/she want to say?
• To whom?
• How? *Costello, 2000*Costello, 2000
Data Collection Data Collection
Enrollment Pre-test Ease of Communication Scale2
APACHE, Motor Screen1
Daily Observations (20min) Chart Review Extubation Post-test Ease of Communication Scale2
Exit Interviews
1. P. Dowden et al. (1986) 2 L.. Menzel (1998).
Part IIPart II
Pilot Research:Pilot Research:
Head and Neck Surgical Head and Neck Surgical UnitUnit
Equipment donationsEquipment donations::
DynaVox Systems, Inc.DynaVox Systems, Inc.
WordsPlus, Inc.WordsPlus, Inc.
AbleNetAbleNet
FundingFunding: : AACN/ Sigma Theta Tau AACN/ Sigma Theta Tau ONS Foundation/ OrthoBiotech ONS Foundation/ OrthoBiotech
Mentorship/Consultation:Dr. Richard Hurtig, University of IowaStephanie Williams, SLP, Dynavox Systems, Inc
I’m OK
AFRAID
Pain shot
HOT
MEDICINE
MOUTH CARE
SICK
MY MOUTH
TV
NURSE
BATH
CAT
NOT OK
GLASSES
HUNGRY
MUSIC DRINK
COLD
DOG
DOCTOR FAMILY
ILOVEYOU HOME TIME
2
3
4
1 Say
BackSpace
Clear
Repeat
TIRED SAD HAPPY ANGRY
PAINNAUSEA
BEDPANSUCTION
WHY?WHERE?HEAR
MessageMateTM
Basic MessagesBasic Messages
Pain Shortness of Breath Suction Help! Hot/Cold Home/Family Anxiety/Worry
Qualitative Data AnalysisQualitative Data Analysis
Fieldnotes and interviews coded for:
1. method2. content 3. barriers 4. facilitators
Quantitative Data AnalysisQuantitative Data Analysis
Descriptive statistics (dispersion) Pattern recognition Nonparametric within case
comparison (EOC)
Study #1: Exploring the Feasiblity of VOCAs with Head and Neck Cancer
Patients Following Surgery
MB. Happ1
S. Kagan2
T. Roesch1
E. Holmes1
Funding: ONS Foundation/OrthoBiotech
1 University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing2 University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing
Head & Neck SampleHead & Neck Sample(n=10)(n=10)
7 men, 3 women all Caucasian 5 MessageMate 5 DynaMyte
Observation & InterviewObservation & Interview
Observations: = 66Communication Events = 50 (75.8%)
Formal Interviews: = 9
Patient = 8Nurse = 1
CharacteristicsCharacteristics (n=10)(n=10)
Ages: 45-82 yrs (57.1+12.8)
Education: 12-20 yrs (13.5+2.9)
Computer Use: 7*
*minimal level = 3/7
CharacteristicsCharacteristics (cont).(cont).
Days w/ device: 3-24 (9.1+ 6.2)
Post-op days prior to device: 1-6 (1.9+.1.6)
APACHE III: 5-53 (27.1+13.2)
Neuromotor Characteristics Neuromotor Characteristics
+ Motor Screen Tasks = 10
+ Write legibly = 10
+ Narcotics/sedation = 35/50 (70%)
Usage PatternsUsage Patterns• VOCAs were used by some of the post surgical patients
- some required extensive assistance, whereas others required limited or no assistance
• Other modalities were used as well-Writing- Gesture
- Mouthing Words- Head Nods
Other findingsOther findings• Of the observed communication events
in which patients utilized the VOCA, patients initiated more frequently than a historical (no-intervention) group.
• a slight increase in ease of communication was observed in the VOCA group when compared with a historical (no-intervention) group.
Novel Scenarios in which Novel Scenarios in which VOCAS were usedVOCAS were used
1. Cardiology evaluation
2. Telephone usage
What were the barriers to What were the barriers to device use?device use?
device out-of-reach upper extremity & neck
wounds blurred vision insufficient staff training in
use patient preference for writing or
other method
Message ContentMessage Content
Comfort needs (pain, thirst, suction)
Questions about home & family “I love you” Questions about tests and
condition Phone conversations
Characteristics of the head and Characteristics of the head and neck patient population that neck patient population that
may have been associated with may have been associated with successful AAC device use:successful AAC device use: All were able to write All were liberated from ventilator Voicelessness was expected More independence
““Tim”Tim”
• 46 year old Caucasian male• S/P Total laryngectomy & tooth
extraction• No prior history of intubation and
mechanical ventilation• No significant past medical history
““Tim”Tim”
• High school graduate• Previous personal computer use• Vision corrected with eyeglasses• Right hand dominance
EnrollmentEnrollment
• Immediate post operative phase• Transferred from Medical Intensive Care
Unit (MICU) to Head and Neck ICU• Patient appeared withdrawn
• Deferred until third post operative day• “just don’t feel like it”
• No device training prior to study enrollment
Device Set UpDevice Set Up
• Device options Message Mate- simple, smaller message
capacityDynaMyte- larger capacity, multi-level
message display
• At bedside• Duration ~1.5 hours• Initial method of communication
• Writing/Gestures
Tim’s RequestsTim’s Requests
• Voice selection
• Message deletions• “Yes/No”• “What time is it?”
• Message Additions• “Hello” & “Good-bye”
Tim’s RequestsTim’s Requests
• Icon/Message change
• Performed at bedside
• Requested by patient and/or family
• During entire enrollment period
• Affect change
Observation of Observation of Communication Events Communication Events
(OCE’s)(OCE’s)
• 7 OCE’s from 5 study days• Narcotic analgesia
• 5/7 OCE’s
• Additional non-AAC methods• Head Nods• Hand Gestures
Tim’s AAC UseTim’s AAC Use
• Most utilized mode• Keyboard feature
Utilized bilateral hands predominantly index fingers and thumb
• 6 available “pop-up” icons with additional methods• Effective navigation
General Interactions with General Interactions with AAC UseAAC Use
• Convey feelings to nurse
• Pain
• Anxiety• Establishing need for suctioning• Requesting assistance in bathing• Communication with RN’s, MD’s, family
Aspects of AAC UseAspects of AAC Use
Positive Negative
Ownership Time Consuming
Sense of Control Unfamiliarity
Connection with Others
Use of space
FeedbackFeedback
• Tim• “I can say everything I want to say right
now through typing [VOCA] and writing.”• “I am satisfied with the way I communicate
in the hospital.”
• Tim’s Sister• “Patients need this device until prosthesis
is in place. It is a great help.”
Practical ChallengesPractical Challenges
• Patient lost access to the device when he transferred off of the Head and Neck Unit (to Cardiology)
• Expensive• Nursing, Physician, Clinician unfamiliarity• Battery back up• Infection control issue -- how to keep the
device sterile• Discharge to home without device?
Tim Taught UsTim Taught Us
• Communication method needs to be customized for each patient
• Options for changes/deletions of various messages at all times
• Once a method is established, it is difficult to change or add another method
Results of this exploratory Results of this exploratory study will be submitted for study will be submitted for
publication….publication….
• Stay tuned…you will be able to access more specific data after the manuscript has been accepted to a peer-reviewed journal.
Part IIIPart III
Pilot Study #2 -- Medical Pilot Study #2 -- Medical Intensive Care Unit Intensive Care Unit (MICU)(MICU)
Exploring the Feasiblity of Exploring the Feasiblity of VOCAs withVOCAs with Nonspeaking ICU Nonspeaking ICU
PatientsPatients
M.B. Happ, PhDT. K. Roesch, BSN
MICU SampleMICU Sample(n=11)(n=11)
15 patients identified 11 participated (73%) 7 men, 4 women 10 Caucasian
Observation & InterviewObservation & Interview
Observations: = 49 Communication Events = 41 (83.7%)
Formal Interviews: = 14
Patient = 8Family = 3Clinician = 3
CharacteristicsCharacteristics (n=11)(n=11)
Ages: 20-72 yrs (45.5+16)
Education: 0-16+ yrs (13+1.9)*
Computer Use: 6
*MR patient excluded from mean
CharacteristicsCharacteristics Intubation:
Tracheostomy: 4Oral ET tube: 7
Primary Medical Dx:Pneumonia/ARDS/Sepsis 7Lung CA 1COPD 1Subglottic Stenosis 1SCI 1
CharacteristicsCharacteristics (cont).(cont).
Days w/ device: 1-14 (5.7+ 4.6)
Ventilator Days: 1-44 (15.5+12.2)
APACHE III: 10-54 (27.5+16.1)
Neuromotor CharacteristicsNeuromotor Characteristics (n=11 Study Patients)(n=11 Study Patients)
+ Motor Screen Tasks = 8- Blind, quadriplegia- Quadriplegia- Morbid Obesity
+ Write legibly = 3
Neuromotor CharacteristicsNeuromotor Characteristics(n=49 observations)(n=49 observations)
Narcotic analgesia = 13 (26.5%)
Anxiolytics/sedation = 22(44.9%)
Usage PatternsUsage Patterns
• Ventilated patients in the MICU used VOCA systems in over 1/4 of the observed communication events• However, usage patterns ranged from “limited”
to “required cues to use”.
• Most of the patients used more than one communication method
• Increased patient initiations were associated with availability of the VOCA
Observed VOCA MessagesObserved VOCA Messages “I love you” = 9 FAQs (go home, restraints, breathing
tube) = 4 Anxiety/worry/ fear = 4 Pain = 3 Comfort (thirst, position, cold) = 3 Family =1
Novel Scenarios in which MICU Novel Scenarios in which MICU patients used VOCAs to patients used VOCAs to
communicatecommunicate1. Informed consent – to participate in
research & diagnostic testing2. Semantically complex message
building3. Patient initiated messages
What is your religion? Is the house clean? I want my sister!
QualityQuality Patient ratings of “Ease of
Communication” increased significantly in the VOCA versus no VOCA (pretreatment) condition.
Anecdotal Reports of Anecdotal Reports of SatisfactionSatisfaction
That [VOCA] was a good thing there, it really helped me. (patient)
It was easier to understand what she wanted. I can’t read sign language…I’m not a good guesser. (husband)
I think it’s more complete and decisive. (RN)
SatisfactionSatisfactionSuggested Design Improvements
Larger screens Greater touch sensitivity Easier keyboard access (DynaMyte) Simplier – less expandable (DynaMyte) Realtime Tracking/Storage of Messages Backlighting (MessageMate)
BarriersBarriers poor positioning/out-of-reach UE weakness blurred vision fluctuating cognition/attention deterioration in condition
BarriersBarriers
It was easier for me to talk with him, and not have to pull out the device, because time is precious around here… Where he could get his point across to me with lip talking, it seemed to lessen the time… - RN
Partner Behaviors that Partner Behaviors that Facilitated VOCA useFacilitated VOCA use
Cueing patients in selection of messages
Repositioning patient or device Aids: glasses, hearing, access tools Patience with slow message
generation Improved condition and UE strength
What we learned about AAC…What we learned about AAC… Start simple Basic instruction card SLP support Tech support Partner training
What we learned about AAC…What we learned about AAC…
Use progressive, expandabletechniques
Capitalize on combined methods Cueing Consistency Repeat instructions
For further information and For further information and specific data from Study #2:specific data from Study #2:
• Keep an eye out for the following article:• Happ, M.B., Roesch, T.K., & Garrett, K.L.
(in press --expected 2004). Exploring the use of electronic VOCAs in the medical intensive care unit. Heart & Lung, 33, issue 2 or 3.
Time for a large-scale study…Time for a large-scale study…• A “large n” study across multiple ICU
units • Planned prospective design with 3
patient/nurse cohorts• Treatment: A systematically designed
AAC and basic communication intervention “package” implemented by nurses and an SLP
• Quantitative analysis of the INTERACTIONS between the nonspeaking patient AND the primary nurse caregiver
SPEACS:SPEACS:SStudy of tudy of PPatient-Nurse atient-Nurse EEffectiveness with ffectiveness with AAssisted ssisted CCommunication ommunication SStrategiestrategies
Multidisciplinary Research TeamMultidisciplinary Research TeamMary Beth Happ, Ph.D., R.N.
Kathryn Garrett, Ph.D., CCC-SLPSusan Sereika, Ph.D.
Elisabeth George, Ph.D., R.N.Michael Donahoe, M.D.Judith Tate, M.S., R.N.
* * * * * * * * * * * School of Nursing University of Pittsburgh
Duquesne University University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
Expert consultants:Maria Connolly, B.S.,R.N. -- Loyola UniversityMelanie Fried-Oken, Ph.D., CCC-SLP -- OHSUNeville Strumpf, Ph.D., R.N. -- U. of Penn
5-Year Funding (2003 -- 2008)5-Year Funding (2003 -- 2008): : National Institute of Child Health and National Institute of Child Health and
Human Development (NICHHD)Human Development (NICHHD)
* * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * *““Improving Communication with Improving Communication with
Nonspeaking Patients in the ICU” Nonspeaking Patients in the ICU” (R01-HD043988-01)(R01-HD043988-01)
OverviewOverview Background and Rationale Research Questions & Study Aims Research Design & Model Independent Variables: Description of 2-Phase
Intervention Packages Procedures Dependent Variables/Data Collection Data Analysis Potential Challenges Invitation to Comment
Definition of Definition of Augmentative & Augmentative & Alternative Communication Alternative Communication
(AAC):(AAC): All communication methods that supplement natural speech including unaided (signing, vocalizations) or aided (writing, typing, electronic device) techniques
- from Beukelman & Mirenda, 1998
• Natural, minimally aided communication strategies are the most frequently used by nonspeaking patients in the ICU.
• Typically, AAC devices are not available.• Problems with relying on natural communication alone
can include:• Mouthing: Patients often cannot clearly mouth words
around the endotracheal tube• Writing: Paper/pen is not made available, the patient is
illiterate, or upper extremity function is inadequate• Gestures: Patients/nurses have no consistently shared
gestural lexicon (Connolly, 1992)• Opportunities: Patients do not receive adequate
opportunities to initiate their own topics and messages (e.g., “Please find my reading glasses”)
• Rate: Message co-construction can be a slow process
Prosthetic Oral ApproachesProsthetic Oral Approaches
Electrolarynx
Tracheostomy one-way speaking valve
Aided Strategies:Aided Strategies:Low tech symbol boards/Low tech symbol boards/
direct selection direct selection
MessageMate
DynaMyteTM
TM
Electronic VOCAsElectronic VOCAs• • synthesized or digitized synthesized or digitized voice outputvoice output• • symbolized messagessymbolized messages• • multiple level optionmultiple level option• • scanning optionscanning option
ChallengesChallenges• AAC is not considered “customary care”
• Nurses do not have easy access to AAC technologies• Nurses do not receive training in their use• Natural communication strategies and/or AAC
technologies are not applied systematically to all conscious ICU patients
• Communication strategies are not individualized for specific patients
• Ongoing consultation about communication strategies typically is not available for nurses in the ICU
SPEACS:SPEACS:SStudy of tudy of PPatient-Nurse atient-Nurse EEffectiveness with ffectiveness with AAssisted ssisted CCommunication ommunication SStrategiestrategies
RQ/Specific Aim #1RQ/Specific Aim #1
What is the impact of two experimental interventions…
(1)Basic Communication Skills Training (BCST) for nurses
(2)AAC techniques and education + individualized SLP consultation
(AAC-SLP)
…on ease, quality, frequency and success of nurse-patient communication?
RQ/Specific Aim #2RQ/Specific Aim #2
How do interactions in the two communication intervention conditions (BCST and AAC-SLP) compare with those in a control (usual care) cohort?
Interventions
AAC/SLPBCST
NurseCommunicationProcess
VoicelessPatient
Outcomes
SuccessEase
QualityFrequency
Happ, M.B. & Garrett, K.L. (2003)
AAC-SLP > BCST > Control on:
easequalityfrequencysuccessfulness
of nurse-patient communication interactions.
Our HYPOTHESIS:
Nonconcurrent Cohort DesignNonconcurrent Cohort Designwith Repeated Measureswith Repeated Measures
Year 1Control
T1 T2 T3 T4
Year 2BCST
X1T1 T2 T3 T4
Year 3AAC-SLP
X2T1 T2 T3 T4
Condition 1 - Usual TreatmentCondition 1 - Usual Treatment
• No specific communication training for nurses
• Communication interaction and intervention at the discretion of the patient or untrained nurses
Condition 2 -- BCSTCondition 2 -- BCST• Training for nurses in basic communication
skills prior to data collection• Delivery:
• 2 hour inservice (instruction & roleplay) with SLP <2 months prior to data collection
• Website consistently available
Sample Basic Communication Sample Basic Communication SkillsSkills
• Approach patient• Alert patient (“George…”)• Tag yes/no questions (“Yes…or No?”)• Provide auditory or written choices • Ask open-ended questions when appropriate (“Tell me what’s on
your mind.”)• Instruct patients to use specific natural modalities if they do not
initiate• Show me one of the gestures we talked about.• Write it for me.• Can you mouth the words more clearly?
• Interpret utterances/mirror gestures
Condition 3 -- AAC + SLPCondition 3 -- AAC + SLP• Incorporates basic communication skills
training• SLP also works with nurse to develop
individualized communication intervention plan for each patient.
• SLP also sets up AAC technologies, conducts message inventory, teaches patient, and trains nurse as appropriate
• SLP is available on an ongoing basis to consult with nurse about communication
Nurse Sample Nurse Sample (quasi-random selection)(quasi-random selection)
5 RNs/unit = 10 RNs x 3 phases
= 30 RNsRN Entry Criteria: 1-year critical care experience Full-time staff, not permanent night Selected from pool of volunteers
Patient SamplePatient Sample 3 pts/RN = 30 pts x 3 phases
= 90 patients
Patient Entry Criteria:• Respiratory intubation • Likely to remain intubated for a min of 48 hrs• Understand English• Glasgow Coma Scale > 13
Exclusion :• Premorbid inability to communicate verbally or
nonverbally (a score of <3 on the NOMS cognition, expressive, and receptive language subscales
• Delirium or limited movement OK
Data SourcesData Sources• Transcriptions of videorecorded
nurse-patient interactions • 3 minute segments -- 2x/day for
2 days for each nurse/patient dyad
• Observer ratings• Field Notes• Clinical record/chart
• Videotapes of the 2-minute nurse/patient interactions will be transcribed and coded for the following variables:• How frequently did the patient initiate
communication?• With which modality?• How many of the nurse-patient communication
exchanges resulted in successful message communication?
• How many breakdowns occurred? How many were successfully repaired?
• How often did the nurse demonstrate behaviors that facilitated communication?
• What was the function of the message?
Observer Ratings of Ease of Observer Ratings of Ease of CommunicationCommunication
Ease of Communication Observer Rating
1. Overall how difficult was it for the patient to communicate with the nurse?
Not difficult <1 2 3 4 5 6 7> Extremely Difficultat all
2. How difficult was it for the patient to communicate physical needs (such asbeing suctioned, being turned, etc.)?
Not difficult <1 2 3 4 5 6 7> Extremely Difficultat all
3. How difficult was it for the patient to communicate thoughts and feelings?
Not difficult <1 2 3 4 5 6 7> Extremely Difficultat all
4. Overall the nurse appeared to feel ________ at the end of the interaction
Calm/satisfied <1 2 3 4 5 6 7> Frustrated/angry
• Field Notes will also be compiled for qualitative analysis of:• Setting variables
• Topics
• Affect
• Unusual circumstances
• Presence of restraints
• Patient’s cognitive status
• Etc.
Data SampleData Sample
4 observations/pt x 30 pts/phase = 120 observations/phase x 3 phases
360 observations
CovariatesCovariates• Will specific patient or nurse variables
explain/predict patterns in the data?
• Patient Co-variates• Gender• Type of ICU• Premorbid communication ability
• Measured by subscales of the NOMS• Severity of Illness (APACHE)• Length of Intubation prior to study
enrollment • Degree of Agitation (CAM-ICU)• Degree of Sedation (RASS)• Motor Ability (Lowenstein)
• Nurse Co-variates
• Total nurse contact time with patient
• Time elapsed since training
• Critical care experience
VoicelessPatient
CommunicationProcess
Outcomes
Interventions
AAC/SLP
Nurse
BCST
Level of Consciousness
Illness Severity
Communication Fx
Motor Fx
SuccessEase
QualityFrequency
Nurse Contact Time
Time Elapsed Since Training
Data Analysis (S.S.)Data Analysis (S.S.)• Exploratory data analysis• Hierarchical generalized linear
modeling (HGLM)• Linear contrasts based on
hypotheses• Model assessment (i.e., residual
analysis and evaluation of outlier/ influential observations)
Potential Problems & Potential Problems & SolutionsSolutions• Brief ICU stays/2 day data collection period• Variable nurse scheduling/ day nurses only, request
same patient• Fluctuation in patient condition/ track delirium and
severity of illness as a co:variate• Diffusion of the intervention/ assess in 2 ICUs, use 3
separate cohorts• Measurement intrusiveness and complexity/ extra effort• Is 2 days enough time to develop an effective
communication intervention?/ oh well -- it represents the real life challenge!
Our timelineOur timeline• January 2004: Final Instrument Development &
Pilot Testing of Procedures• March 2004: Nurse/Patient enrollment for
Usual Care Condition• March 2005: Begin BCST Condition
• January 2006: Begin AAC-SLP Condition
• January 2007: Data Analysis
• July 2008: Complete Data Summarization
HandoutsHandouts• Please cite information from this
presentation as follows: ******• Correspondence:
• Mary Beth Happ, Ph.D., R.N.• University of Pittsburgh• [email protected]
• Kathryn Garrett, Ph.D., CCC-SLP• Duquesne University• [email protected]