a visual analysis of the illuminated opening pages of a sixteenth … · 1 abstract of proposed...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Abstract of proposed paper for the Eighth Islamic Manuscript Conference at Queen’s College, University of Cambridge,
9-11 July 2012 for The Science of Manuscripts.
A visual analysis of the illuminated opening pages of a sixteenth century Iranian manuscript, and
a reconstruction with reference to contemporary treatises and empirical practical
experimentation. Anita Chowdry
Expanded Abstract
This paper covers a unique approach to studying and analyzing the processes and materials employed in
creating illuminated and illustrated manuscripts using a combination of non-invasive visual evidence,
empirical experimentation and studies of treatises contemporary to the material in question.
The documented process of investigation includes study-room notes and evidence from macro-photography,
followed by details of the author’s reconstruction of one of the pages. The reconstruction includes the
selection and preparation of paper, analysing and drawing the design, and discussing the challenges involved
on the subject of ruling lines, with reference to passages in treatises.
The analysis continues with the selection, preparation and properties of the colours used in the exercise and
some surprising observations about technique. There will be a demonstration of how processes and
preparations are informed by a combination of personal experience and recent re-translations by the author
of some well-known Iranian treatises, and finally a progressive series of images showing how the
reconstruction of the page has been built up.
The object of the case-study offered is SOAS MS. 25293 folios 1v-2r, a copy of the Divan of Jami dated 941AH
(1534-35 CE) probably produced in Herat. In a brief description of the manuscript in the 2007 catalogue
“Objects of Instruction: Treasures of the School of Oriental and African Studies” Anna Contadini comments
on the style:
“...The arrangement of this decoration, with its particular palette, strongly resembles that of manuscripts
produced in Herat, and its quality, together with that of the paper and the beautiful calligraphic nasta’liq
script, suggests that it may have been produced for a high ranking patron such as Bahram Mirza, governor of
Herat from 1530-1534.” (Contadini, 2007)
2
OBSERVING, DECONSTRUCTING, AND RECONSTRUCTING THE SUBJECT
OBSERVING AND ANALYZING THE LAYOUT AND CONSTRUCTION OF THE DESIGN
The measurements of the manuscript are H: 23.5 cm X W:
14.5 cm; it has clearly been trimmed down slightly from its
original dimensions, repaired and rebound in a European
binding.
The design is basically a mirror-image of itself over the two
pages, symmetrical and restrained in its execution, in
keeping with styles of illumination developed in Herat over
the previous century.
This figure shows a scaled diagram of one side of the
design, with the measurements of some of the elements.
The layout of these two pages would have been designed
as an integral part of the general layout of the entire
manuscript; it is in fact the title-page(s) and contains the
title of the book, stylized invocations and dedications. In
this case we will examine one side of the double-page
design.
The first stage of drafting the design would be the mastar/jadval or ruling which would probably have been
done by a specialist according to specific formats favoured within the workshop. The outer border measures
2.5 cm in width, and is composed of a regular reciprocal arch design in lapis lazuli and gold, punctuated on
each of its three sides by a superimposed taj or crown design, each taj being identical. There is no border on
one side of the page, only a series of rulings indicating that this is the binding side. The section within the
border contains two identical cartouches, top and bottom, to contain title and invocations, and a central
text panel bordered on each side by an illuminated strip. Each element of the design is separated from the
other by a narrow gold border containing a band-e-rumi design, and the outer border is embellished with
lapis lazuli “rays”.
Observation of the jadval on the gutter edge of the page with
reference to a treatise translated by Minorsky[2] shows a similarity in
the sequence of colours and outlines between the 16th century
treatise and the manuscript. Interestingly the manuscript is lacking a
line mentioned in the treatise: “..Still lower, draw a light green
line...” . There is a clear cut in the original page at this point, and it
has been remounted on a fresh strip of paper. This suggests that the
absent green line was ruled in zengar or verdigris pigment which on
degrading could well have created a precise cut in the fabric of the
paper.
3
Observation of the verso of one of
the illuminated pages shows
distinct areas where elements of
the illuminated design have
‘burned’ through the paper,
indicating the use of reactive
mineral pigments. In this case the
areas of discolouration
correspond to areas of red, white
and green, suggesting lead
carbonates and copper acetates.
Macro photography reveals details
of the craft of the mozaheb or
illuminator, showing the sequence
in which design elements and
colours were applied and also
greater detail of areas that have
degraded, such as the white
(possibly lead carbonate) above.
Areas of green (possibly copper
acetate) which have been applied
on top of gold appear to have
maintained their integrity.
There is great spontaneity of execution within the rigid overall structure of the design; the detailed elements
of eslimi or ‘arabesques’ and the floral elements are clearly drafted freehand, with an acceptance of the
inherent asymmetry. There is another interesting observation in the image above right, which shows a
detail of the taj: the stems of the foliage are burnished to contrast with the un-burnished gold ground. The
burnishing is executed on top of the ground, contradicting conventional wisdom in current practice, where
burnished areas are always executed first, with the un-burnished ground painted in around them. This is
further verified by the fact that the black lines that define the stems ‘mis-register’ with the burnished lines.
4
The designs of different elements of the
illuminated page have been recreated using
proportional measurements and
observations from the original. Given that
the original illuminator has worked within a
traditional grammar in which infinite
variations can be built up using specific
conventions, this is not as difficult to
analyze as may first seem. There are
specific underlying constructions, such as
the reciprocal arches on the border, the
superimposed crenellated taj or crown,
the central eslimi motif on the taj and the
geometric band-e-rumi border that defines
and separates different parts of the overall
composition of the page. The design is
afforded an illusion of greater complexity
by means of the meandering floral ‘fillers’.
Below is a demonstration of how a simple
leaf element is used quasi-geometrically to
construct a variety of design elements such
as are seen in the illumination under study.
These constructions are known collectively
as eslimi, and some of the structures have
specific names, such a ‘dragon’s mouth’
dahan-e-azdehar. (Takestani, 2004)
There are several contemporary historical
references for design elements in
illumination; one of the most well known is
the treatise “Qanun al-sovar” written by
the 16th century painter Sadeqi Beg Afshar
(Afshar, circa 1530) who served in the
Safavid court. The original Persian text has
been published by Yves Porter. (Porter,
1994, 2007) In a wonderfully detailed
section about how to handle the bush
Sadeqi Beg cleverly inserts the main
‘principles’ of painting into his couplets
“...my master showed me the way, which
has Eslimi also Khatai, If you are aware of
Abru and Vaq, then you will be in demand
like a Niloufar Farangi , And do not forget
Band-e-Rumi, commit to memory the name
of each one.
5
Understanding these ‘seven principles of painting’ or haft asl-e-naqqashi was clearly an important aspect of
an illuminator’s training at the time, and though we are not precisely clear as to the exact definition of all of
them, they can be roughly understood as follows: Eslimi is usually translated into English as ‘Arabesque’ and
refers to the structural designs above, based on stylized leaves and tendrils; Khatai could refer to anything to
do with line (khat) or with Chinese art, Abru means cloud – it is unclear whether this means marbling in the
Turkish sense of Ebru or whether is refers to Chinese cloud designs, Vaq refers to foliage designs
incorporating the faces of people or animals, and suggests legends of the island of Vaq-Vaq where voyagers
found beautiful maidens growing on trees; Niloufar is the Chinese-inspired lotus, Farangi means foreign,
referring to elements borrowed from European design, and Band-e-Rumi is a specific type of geometrical
border derived from Byzantine decorative art.
RECONSTRUCTING THE DESIGN
Undertaking the project of re-creating the illuminated page is a valuable exercise in that it holistically brings
into focus all aspects of the illuminator’s art. Basing this practice on fresh and rigorous observation and with
reference to historical records lends it authenticity as a process of research. Ideally it should be undertaken
in collaboration with scientific analysis; where this is not immediately possible, empirical deduction – which
may or may not be accurate, is acceptable as long as it is acknowledged as such. In this case I was obliged to
research modern papers in order to find a surface that would offer similar qualities to the original paper of
the manuscript. It needed to be thin and fine textured with a strong internal sizing so that it could withstand
the processes of dyeing and burnishing. In colouring the paper I referenced the work of Dr. Mandana
Barkeshli * on henna as a dye for paper (please help me with the exact reference for this academic paper).
Another challenge that presented itself was in the ruling of lines, a process which requires great skill and
adequate tools –I had to source historical tools for the purpose as modern tools are neither precise nor fine
enough for the job, and the challenge opened up another avenue for potential research – that of the design
and manufacture of technical and scientific instruments in 16th century Iran. (I hope someone can enlighten
us at the forthcoming conference)
6
In the original page all the black lines are riled first, followed by burnished gold rulings and bands measuring
approximately 6mm in width which will take the band-e-Rumi design. White lines edging these sections are
painted on top of the gold, and finally the defining lines in black. White separations between elements of the
design are a distinctive feature of illumination in the Herat style, and it seems that all of these are also
applied at this stage.
Band-e-Rumi designs are rigidly geometrical ‘woven’ patterns which require guidelines for their
construction. At this small scale drawing them in would create an incomprehensible mess, so it is vital firstly
to understand the construction (see sketches above) and then to find a way of applying a framework that is
as unobtrusive as possible – the only practical solution at this scale is to make tiny pin-pricks indicating
intersections of the grid, using the eye to measure their distances. The use of a practiced eye for measuring
is clearly apparent when a section of the design on the original is observed in magnification – the work is by
no means mechanically perfect, and there are even areas where the illuminator has confused the sequence a
little. The white lines bordering the band-e-Rumi (degraded to grey in the original) are embellished with a
primitive pattern composed of tiny dashes and crosses – a simple device that was continuously and
extensively used in Iran and Mughal India to define illuminated passages.
The salient lines of the illuminated patterns are drawn in with black pigment and a brush using clear
calligraphic lines, precise and fluid at the same time. It is my opinion that the aesthetic for the execution of
illuminated design stems directly from that of calligraphy, with the emphasis on movement (harkat),
proportion and beauty of line – a fine example of the illuminator’s art such as this demonstrates that
mechanical exactitude is not a desired priority, but rather that the free-flowing ‘hand’ of the artist should be
7
apparent. In his section ‘On holding the brush’ Sadequi Beg advises: “...Do not grasp your brush (at the place
of the knots) in your fist, with two fingers make a holding place for your brush; Three others will support
those two, so that the drawing of your brush becomes considered. At the time of working you must be
courageous; you must not hold the brush too tightly...” (Afshar, circa 1530)
After the areas of gold and the basic construction of the design have been applied, the pattern details are
built up in logical progression, starting with the eslimi structures, and progressing to the meandering floral
fillers.
The ground colours of lapis lazuli and black are applied at the end. Whereas this would seem to be an
unnecessarily tedious way of working – it would appear more logical to paint the elements on top of the
background – there are good reasons for this, driven by the properties of the pigments themselves, most
particularly the properties of the blue lapis lazuli ground.
Lapis Lazuli or lajevard is a precious pigment used extensively in Iranian illumination. The Herat school
favoured darker and richer shades whereas other centres of the art such as Tabriz, Shiraz and Esfahan
favoured a brighter cornflower blue. Lapis lazuli stone was and still is mined at Badakshan, now on the
border of Afghanistan, and the specialist process of extracting the pigment ‘lazurite’ from the mineral was
complicated and difficult, the details of which are not in the remit of this paper. What is important however
is the range of characteristics inherent in the pigment itself, which makes it equally difficult to use.
An earlier empirical experiment
demonstrates the difficulty in applying
other colours on top of a field of lapis
lazuli. This is particularly noticeable when
using gold, which sinks right into the lapis
lazuli and cannot be burnished. The
particles of the pigment, even when finely
ground, are gritty and sharp, making it
difficult to apply an even ground, and
difficult indeed to bind. Conservators will
also notice that though the colour itself is
very stable and does not degrade, that it
is prone to rub off like a powder, rather
than flake off like most colours.
8
I have found that applying more gum Arabic medium than is necessary darkens the colour, and this may
have been one of the methods used by illuminators trained in Herat to create an illusion of richness in the
colour, and also to make it a little easier to handle. The overall conclusion is that the properties of the
pigment made it necessary to apply it last of all, using the illuminator’s skill to work it cleanly around the fine
lines of intricate design.
The range of colours used in the illumination are shown above, and include other pigments that require
more detailed consideration, such as zengar - verdigris or copper acetate- and kermes. This is still ‘work in
progress’ and may also extend the length of the paper beyond its permitted length (please advise)
For the conclusion to the presentation the intention is to show an animation with progressive frames
representing the documentation of the reconstruction as it developed, ending with a comparison between
the reconstruction and the original page.
9
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Contadini, A. (2007). Objects of Instruction: Treasures of the School of Oriental and African Studies. London:
SOAS University of London.
Minorsky, T. A. (1959). Calligraphers and Painters: treetise by Qadi Ahmad, son of Mir-munshi (circa
A.H.1015,/ A.D.1606. Washington, D.C.: Washington D.C. Freer Gallery of Art. Occaisional papers; v.3, no.2.
Porter, Y. (1994, 2007). Painters, Paintings and Books: An essay on Indo-Persian Technical Literature, 12 - 19
Centuries. New Delhi: Manohar, Centre for Human Sciences, New Delhi.
Takestani, A. M. (2004). The Art of Illumination. Tehran: Soroush Press.