a user assessment of decision support tools

35
A User Assessment of Decision Support Tools for Addressing Nonpoint Source Pollution in the Saginaw Basin Watershed: Environmental Learning Using Computer Interactive Decisions (ELUCID) and the Great Lakes Watershed Management System (GLWMS) Laura Young, Research Assistant Saichon Seedang, Research Specialist Michigan State University Institute of Water Research 69 th Soil Water Conservation Society International Annual Conference Making Waves in Conservation July 29, Lombard, Illinois

Upload: soil-and-water-conservation-society

Post on 20-Jun-2015

236 views

Category:

Environment


0 download

DESCRIPTION

69th SWCS International Annual Conference July 27-30, 2014 Lombard, IL

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: A user assessment of decision support tools

A User Assessment of Decision Support Tools for Addressing Nonpoint Source Pollution in the Saginaw Basin Watershed:

Environmental Learning Using Computer Interactive Decisions (ELUCID) and the Great Lakes Watershed Management System (GLWMS)

Laura Young, Research AssistantSaichon Seedang, Research Specialist

Michigan State University Institute of Water Research

69th Soil Water Conservation Society International Annual ConferenceMaking Waves in ConservationJuly 29, Lombard, Illinois

Page 2: A user assessment of decision support tools

CONTEXT & SYSTEMS OVERVIEW

Page 3: A user assessment of decision support tools

Context

Awarded Great Lakes Restoration Initiative (GLRI) grant

Enhance technical assistance

Accelerate BMP implementation

Reduce non‐point source pollution

Page 4: A user assessment of decision support tools

Trainings

• May 2014• Overview and walkthrough of systems• Tutorials• Evaluation

Page 5: A user assessment of decision support tools

ELUCID

Environmental Learning Using Computer Interactive Decisions

Developed with input from various stakeholders

Flint River Watershed

Page 6: A user assessment of decision support tools

ELUCID

Engage and inform various users groupsField staff, watershed groups, teachers, the public

Page 7: A user assessment of decision support tools

ELUCIDSubwatershed Prioritization Field‐level Prioritization

Page 8: A user assessment of decision support tools

ELUCID

Seamlessly linked with other systemsEPA databases, GLWMS

Page 9: A user assessment of decision support tools

Great Lakes Watershed Management System

Evolved through various multi‐partner efforts

Four GLRI priority watersheds (Saginaw Bay)

Page 10: A user assessment of decision support tools

Great Lakes Watershed Management System

Subwatershed prioritization for NPS pollutants

Page 11: A user assessment of decision support tools

Great Lakes Watershed Management System

Provides baseline NPS pollution model estimates at field‐scales

Page 12: A user assessment of decision support tools

Great Lakes Watershed Management System

Conducts field‐scale scenario evaluations of land cover changes or best management practices (BMPs)

Page 13: A user assessment of decision support tools

Great Lakes Watershed Management System

Page 14: A user assessment of decision support tools

FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATION

Page 15: A user assessment of decision support tools

Assessment PurposeTo evaluate:

– Perceived usefulness of system2

• Prioritizing high risk sites• Engaging producers

– Impacts of usage on efficiency at work– Integration into conservation work processes1

– Ease of use1– Transparency1– Anticipated Usage– Identify additional features needed to improve DSS’s– Participants’ understanding of material presented at the training

1. Inman, D., M. et. al. 2011. 

2. Ives., B., M. Olson, J. Baroudi. 1983.

Page 16: A user assessment of decision support tools

Survey Instrument

• Types of Questions– ELUCID, GLWMS, Training– Five‐point Likert Scale (51)– Multiple Choice (7)– Short Answer (12)

• Administered online through Survey Gizmo

Page 17: A user assessment of decision support tools

RESULTS

Page 18: A user assessment of decision support tools

Survey Population

Sample size: 17 trainees

Response Rate: 82%– 14 completions– 1 partial completion– 2 did not take survey

Page 19: A user assessment of decision support tools

Profession

Page 20: A user assessment of decision support tools

Will help me work with producers to place BMPs on high risk areas

Will help me work with producers to place BMPs on high risk areas

Will increase my ability engage with a producer

Will increase my ability engage with a producer

A producer will more motivated to implement a BMP on a high risk area

after reviewing data in ELUCID

A producer will more motivated to implement a BMP on a high risk area

after reviewing data in GLWMS

ELUCID

GLWMS

Perceived Usefulness

Page 21: A user assessment of decision support tools

ELUCID

GLWMS

Will help me work with producers to place BMPs on high risk areas

Will help me work with producers to place BMPs on high risk areas

Perceived Usefulness

Page 22: A user assessment of decision support tools

A producer will be more motivated to implement a BMP on a high risk area

after reviewing data in ELUCID

A producer will be more motivated to implement a BMP on a high risk area

after reviewing data in GLWMS

ELUCID

GLWMS

Perceived Usefulness

Page 23: A user assessment of decision support tools

Will increase my ability to engage with a producer

Will increase my ability to engage with a producer

ELUCID

GLWMS

Perceived Usefulness

Page 24: A user assessment of decision support tools

Will make my work easier

Will make my work easier

Will reduce the amount of effort I spend on certain aspects of my work.

Will reduce the amount of effort I spend on certain aspects of my work.

Will reduce the amount of time I spend on certain aspects of my work.

Will reduce the amount of time I spend on certain aspects of my work.

Perceived Impacts on Efficiency

ELUCID

GLWMS

Page 25: A user assessment of decision support tools

Will make my work easier

Will make my work easier

Perceived Impacts on Efficiency

ELUCID

GLWMS

Page 26: A user assessment of decision support tools

Will reduce the amount of effort I spend on certain aspects of my work.

Will reduce the amount of effort I spend on certain aspects of my work.

Perceived Impacts on Efficiency

ELUCID

GLWMS

Page 27: A user assessment of decision support tools

Will reduce the amount of time I spend on certain aspects of my work.

Will reduce the amount of time I spend on certain aspects of my work.

Perceived Impacts on Efficiency

ELUCID

GLWMS

Page 28: A user assessment of decision support tools

ELUCID will easily integrate into my conservation work process.

The GLWMS will easily integrate into my conservation work process.

Perceived Potential for Integration

ELUCID fills a gap in the current set of tools I frequently use to do my job.

The GLWMS fills a gap in the current set of tools I frequently use to do my job.

ELUCID

GLWMS

Page 29: A user assessment of decision support tools

ELUCID fills a gap in the current set of tools I frequently use to do my job.

The GLWMS fills a gap in the current set of tools I frequently use to do my job.

Perceived Potential for Integration

ELUCID

GLWMS

Page 30: A user assessment of decision support tools

ELUCID will easily integrate into my conservation work process.

The GLWMS will easily integrate into my conservation work process.

Perceived Potential for Integration

ELUCID

GLWMS

Page 31: A user assessment of decision support tools
Page 32: A user assessment of decision support tools
Page 33: A user assessment of decision support tools

Future Work

• Follow‐up survey– Barriers to targeted conservation– How respondents have used the system

• Focus groups• Examining Google Analytics data with evaluation results

Page 34: A user assessment of decision support tools

ReferencesInman, D., M. Blind, I. Ribarova, A. Krause, O. Roosenschoon, A. Kassahun, H. Scholten, G. Arampatzis, G. 

Abrami, B. McIntosh, P. Jeffery. 2011. Perceived effectiveness of environmental decision support systems in participatory planning: Evidence from small groups of end‐users. Environmental Modelling & Software. 26, 302‐309.

Ives, B. M. Olson, and J. J. Baroudi. 1983. The Measurement of User Information Systems. Communications of the ACM. 26 (10): 785‐793.

Matthews, K.B., M. Rivington, K.L. Blackstock, G. McCrum, K. Buchan, and D.G. Miller. 2010. Raising the bar? The challenges of evaluating the outcomes of environmental modelling and software. Environmental Modelling & Software. 26: 247‐257.

Rhee, C. and H. Raghav Rao. 2008. Evaluation of Decision Support Systems. International Handbook on Information Systems. 

Page 35: A user assessment of decision support tools

QUESTIONS?

www.iwr.msu.edu/flintriverelucid.iwr.msu.eduwww.iwr.msu.edu/glwms

Laura [email protected]

517‐353‐8587