a tram stop for vancouver

31
1 A STREETCAR SHELTER FOR THE ARBUTUS CORRIDOR A STUDIED SIMPLICITY: EXPRESSING THE W-SHAPE BENJAMIN BYE | ARCHITECTURE 462 | THURSDAY NOON LAB | LAUREN GARVEY

Upload: benjamin-bye

Post on 22-Mar-2016

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Structural design in steel.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: A Tram Stop For Vancouver

1

A STREETCAR SHELTER FOR THE ARBUTUS CORRIDORA STUDIED SIMPLICITY: EXPRESSING THE W-SHAPE

BENJAMIN BYE | ARCHITECTURE 462 | THURSDAY NOON LAB | LAUREN GARVEY

Page 2: A Tram Stop For Vancouver

2

Page 3: A Tram Stop For Vancouver

3

SIMPLICITY IN STEEL

In the design of a steel streetcar stop for the Arbutus Corridor in Vancouver, B.C. the exploration of structure as ornament was made. Taking precedent from the structures of Mies Van Der Rohe, the streetcar station showcases the steel that makes its structure. To exemplify and showcase the steel, W-shape mem-bers where utilized for their clear identifi ability as structural ele-ments. To strengthen the purity and clarity of the Van Der Rohe infl uenced structure, a simple and clearly defi ned structural hi-erarchy and load distribution was designed. The structure con-tains four levels of member hierarchy. Purlins act as stiffening members, bracing the weak axis of the cantilevered joists. The joists, running cross sectionally, are the primary spanning mem-bers, collecting the initial snow load and material load on the structure. Two longitudinal girders direct loads from the joists into the four columns. The building is braced through the use of moment connections. Bents are created as the columns are connected by spanning joists and girders. To further brace the structure against strong lateral loads the columns are driven into the ground forming a moment connection at the base of the column. Through the process of designing with pure structural intention a truly simple and beautiful structure can be created. With the focus on clarity and purity of structure, a balance of structural effi ciency and articulation was made. Some members were slightly oversized for this cause, giving more importance to the aesthetic possibilities of the structure than could have been achieved with a purely effi ciency based design. The outcome is one of aesthetically reasoned structural design.

< EXPLODED AXONThe axon brakes apart the streetcar stop and exemplifi es the rational simplicity to which the structure was designed. The ar-ticulation of structural members becomes the ornament of the streetcar stop.

PURLINS

JOISTS

GIRDERS

COLUMNS

CLEAR HIERARCHY

IIT Crown Hall. Mies Van Der Rohe. Structure as Ornament

Page 4: A Tram Stop For Vancouver

4

AXONOMETRIC DRAWING: STRUCTURAL GEOMETRY

Page 5: A Tram Stop For Vancouver

5

MODEL PHOTOGRAPHS

STRUCTURAL ARTICULATION

Page 6: A Tram Stop For Vancouver

6

LONGITUDINAL ELEVATION 1/4”=1’

CROSS SECTION 1/4”=1’

20ft

12ft

8ft

8ft

THE STRUCTURAL UNIT DRAWN

Page 7: A Tram Stop For Vancouver

7

LONGITUDINAL ELEVATION 1/4”=1’

PLAN 1/4”=1”

20ft

12ft

Page 8: A Tram Stop For Vancouver

8

EARLY DESIGN WORK:THINKING THROUGH DRAWING

left: many different formal and structural ex-plorations where made at the beginning of the design process, and an evolution was made towards the current structural scheme.

above: day dreaming a simple design detail was born that was to be the genesis of the structure.

below: through drawing, geometries and porpor-tions were tweaked until the final scheme was produced.

thinking through drawing.

unsettling proportions early on... considered, balanced, and appropriate proportions...

Page 9: A Tram Stop For Vancouver

9

Page 10: A Tram Stop For Vancouver

10

Page 11: A Tram Stop For Vancouver

11

Page 12: A Tram Stop For Vancouver

12

Page 13: A Tram Stop For Vancouver

13

Page 14: A Tram Stop For Vancouver

14

.75 snow load: w= .75k/ft

.75 wind load: 1.8k

.75 wind load: 1.8k

.75 snow load: w= .0375k/ft

dead load: w= .12k/ft

dead load: w= .06k/ft

note: the loads are placed on the joist members because ultimately in this design the purlins purposes is to brace the weak axis of the joists. In studying forces flow in the structure, it was most acurate to distribute loads in this man-ner.

MULTIFRAME: AN OVERVIEW OF THE MODEL

Page 15: A Tram Stop For Vancouver

15

.75 wind load: 1.8k

Moment Diagram: Because of the high level of wind load on the structure, the columns provide the most lateral resistance so they have the highest moments. The moment graph also illustrates the clear necesity for member hierarchy with the col-umns needing to resit the most force, and the purlins the least. The only member with noticeable weak axis bending is the column, which will be illustrated in the column de-sign check.

Mmax for the structure: 4.825k-ft (column)

Axial Stress Diagram: As tributary mem-bers for all loading on the structure, the columns are the main members that need to take compression and tension stresses in mind. The joists between the columns also contain higher compression stresses, acting as bracing members reacting against the high wind load.

Pmax for the Structure: 3.017k (column)

Deflection Diagram: Deflection in the structure is most prominant in the columns with a total deflection of 0.052 inches. The deflection is well below the maximum al-lowed deflection factor. This graph also illustrates how there is a slight torsional effect in the girder due to the support of the joist cantilever. The actual deflection is neg-ligable, it is just exagerated in the deflection diagram.

Total Deflection For Structure: 0.052in

Page 16: A Tram Stop For Vancouver

16

TYPICAL CANTILEVER JOIST: A-36 Steel | W6 x 9 Shape | Spanning Member

Mx-max : 1.021k-ft

The weak axis My-max is negligable at 0.002k-ft

Pmax : 0.00k

Page 17: A Tram Stop For Vancouver

17

Max Deflection: 0.005in

Deflection Check:

Allowable Deflection = l = 4ft x 12in/ft = 0.26in 180 180

Allowable Deflection: 0.26in > Max Deflection: 0.005in

passes deflection check

Page 18: A Tram Stop For Vancouver

18

DEPARTMENT OF ARCHITECTURESchool of Architecture and Allied ArtsUniversity of Oregon

Architecture 462/562Mark Donofrio

Winter 2012

W ShapesStructural Design - Steel Design Spreadsheet

Copyright © 2011 by Mark Donofrio 1 of 2

Designer: GTF:Ben Bye Lauren Garvey

Material Properties: Section Properties:Steel Type: A36 Section: W6X9

Fy: 36 ksi Area: 2.68 in2

Fu: 58 ksiE: 29000 ksi Axis X-X (Strong Axis) Axis Y-Y (Weak Axis)

Ix: 16.4 in4 Iy: 2.2 in4

Sx: 5.56 in3 Sy: 1.11 in3

rx: 2.47 in ry: 0.905 in

Member Data:Member ID: Typ. Cantilever Axial Properties (Column Buckling):

Unbraced Length - X-Axis: 4 ft Unbraced Length - Y-Axis: 2 ftK-Condition: e K-Condition: eK-Value: 2.1 K-Value: 2.1

Member Loads: Axial Tension P: 0 kipsMoment - Strong Axis: Mx MAX: 1.021 kip-ftMoment - Weak Axis: My MAX: 0.002 kip-ft

Axial - Tension Check [AISC Spec D1]:Utilization:

ft: 0.00 ksi < Ft: 22 ksi OK 0.0%

Axial - Compression Check [AISC Spec E2]:

Strong Axis - X: Weak Axis - X:KL/rx: 40.8 KL/rx: 55.7 <-- Governs

Cc: 126.1

Governing Effective Slenderness Ratio:KL/r = 55.7 Cc = 126.1 Therefore, use EQN E2-1 [AISC]

Utilization:fc: N/A ksi Fc: 17.8 ksi N/A

Flexure Check - Strong Axis [AISC Spec. F1]: Fbx = 0.6Fy

Utilization:fbx: 2.20 ksi < Fbx: 22 ksi OK 10.2%

Flexure Check - Weak Axis [AISC Spec. F2]: Fby = 0.75Fy

Utilization:fby: 0.02 ksi < Fby: 27 ksi OK 0.1%

Designer: GTF:Ben Bye Lauren Garvey

Member ID: Typ. Cantilever

Combined Stress Check:Axial Compression and Bending [AISC Spec H1]:

F'ex: 89.7 ksi F'

ey: 48.1 ksiCmx: 1 Cmy: 1

Page 19: A Tram Stop For Vancouver

19

DEPARTMENT OF ARCHITECTURESchool of Architecture and Allied ArtsUniversity of Oregon

Architecture 462/562Mark Donofrio

Winter 2012

W ShapesStructural Design - Steel Design Spreadsheet

Copyright © 2011 by Mark Donofrio 2 of 2

AISC EQN H1-1

AISC EQN H1-2

AISC EQN H1-3

Axial Tension and Bending [AISC Spec H2]:

AISC EQN H2-1

0.00 + 0.10 + 0.00 = 0.10 < 1.0 OK

Section is satisfactory

Page 20: A Tram Stop For Vancouver

20

TYPICAL COLUMN: A-36 Steel | W8 x 31 Shape | Supporting Member

Mx-max: 4.825k-ft (strong axis)

My-max: 0.646k-ft (weak axis)

Page 21: A Tram Stop For Vancouver

21

My-max: 0.646k-ft (weak axis)

Max Deflection: 0.052in

P-max: 3.017k compression

Deflection Check:

Allowable Deflection = h = 8ft x 12in/ft = 0.192in 500 500 Allowable Deflection: 0.192in > Max Deflection: 0.052in

passes deflection check

Page 22: A Tram Stop For Vancouver

22

DEPARTMENT OF ARCHITECTURESchool of Architecture and Allied ArtsUniversity of Oregon

Architecture 462/562Mark Donofrio

Winter 2012

W ShapesStructural Design - Steel Design Spreadsheet

Copyright © 2011 by Mark Donofrio 1 of 2

Designer: GTF:Ben Bye Lauren Garvey

Material Properties: Section Properties:Steel Type: A36 Section: W8X31

Fy: 36 ksi Area: 9.12 in2

Fu: 58 ksiE: 29000 ksi Axis X-X (Strong Axis) Axis Y-Y (Weak Axis)

Ix: 110 in4 Iy: 37.1 in4

Sx: 27.5 in3 Sy: 9.27 in3

rx: 3.47 in ry: 2.02 in

Member Data:Member ID: Typ. Column Axial Properties (Column Buckling):

Unbraced Length - X-Axis: 8 ft Unbraced Length - Y-Axis: 8 ftK-Condition: c K-Condition: cK-Value: 1.2 K-Value: 1.2

Member Loads: Axial Compression P: 3.017 kipsMoment - Strong Axis: Mx MAX: 4.825 kip-ftMoment - Weak Axis: My MAX: 0.646 kip-ft

Axial - Tension Check [AISC Spec D1]:Utilization:

ft: N/A ksi Ft: 22 ksi N/A

Axial - Compression Check [AISC Spec E2]:

Strong Axis - X: Weak Axis - X:KL/rx: 33.2 KL/rx: 57.0 <-- Governs

Cc: 126.1

Governing Effective Slenderness Ratio:KL/r = 57.0 < Cc = 126.1 Therefore, use EQN E2-1 [AISC]

Utilization:fc: 0.33 ksi < Fc: 17.7 ksi OK 1.9%

Flexure Check - Strong Axis [AISC Spec. F1]: Fbx = 0.6Fy

Utilization:fbx: 2.11 ksi < Fbx: 22 ksi OK 9.7%

Flexure Check - Weak Axis [AISC Spec. F2]: Fby = 0.75Fy

Utilization:fby: 0.84 ksi < Fby: 27 ksi OK 3.1%

Designer: GTF:Ben Bye Lauren Garvey

Member ID: Typ. Column

Combined Stress Check:Axial Compression and Bending [AISC Spec H1]:

F'ex: 135.5 ksi F'

ey: 45.9 ksiCmx: 1 Cmy: 1

AISC EQN H1-1

Page 23: A Tram Stop For Vancouver

23

DEPARTMENT OF ARCHITECTURESchool of Architecture and Allied ArtsUniversity of Oregon

Architecture 462/562Mark Donofrio

Winter 2012

W ShapesStructural Design - Steel Design Spreadsheet

Copyright © 2011 by Mark Donofrio 2 of 2

AISC EQN H1-2

fa/Fa: 0.02 < 0.15

AISC EQN H1-3

0.02 + 0.10 + 0.03 = 0.15 < 1.0 OK

Section is satisfactory

Axial Tension and Bending [AISC Spec H2]:

AISC EQN H2-1

Page 24: A Tram Stop For Vancouver

24

TYPICAL GIRDER CANTILEVER: A-36 Steel | W8 x 10 Shape | Spanning Member

Mx-max : 1.616k-ft

Pmax : 0k

Page 25: A Tram Stop For Vancouver

25

Max Deflection: .042in

Deflection Check:

Allowable Deflection = l = 6ft x 12in/ft = 0.4in 180 180 Allowable Deflection: 0.4in > Max Deflection: 0.042in

passes deflection check

Page 26: A Tram Stop For Vancouver

26

DEPARTMENT OF ARCHITECTURESchool of Architecture and Allied ArtsUniversity of Oregon

Architecture 462/562Mark Donofrio

Winter 2012

W ShapesStructural Design - Steel Design Spreadsheet

Copyright © 2011 by Mark Donofrio 1 of 2

Designer: GTF:Ben Bye Lauren Garvey

Material Properties: Section Properties:Steel Type: A36 Section: W8X10

Fy: 36 ksi Area: 2.96 in2

Fu: 58 ksiE: 29000 ksi Axis X-X (Strong Axis) Axis Y-Y (Weak Axis)

Ix: 30.8 in4 Iy: 2.09 in4

Sx: 7.81 in3 Sy: 1.06 in3

rx: 3.22 in ry: 0.841 in

Member Data:Member ID: Typ. Girder Axial Properties (Column Buckling):

Unbraced Length - X-Axis: 6 ft Unbraced Length - Y-Axis: 4 ftK-Condition: e K-Condition: eK-Value: 2.1 K-Value: 2.1

Member Loads: Axial Compression P: 0 kipsMoment - Strong Axis: Mx MAX: 1.616 kip-ftMoment - Weak Axis: My MAX: 0.01 kip-ft

Axial - Tension Check [AISC Spec D1]:Utilization:

ft: N/A ksi Ft: 22 ksi N/A

Axial - Compression Check [AISC Spec E2]:

Strong Axis - X: Weak Axis - X:KL/rx: 47.0 KL/rx: 119.9 <-- Governs

Cc: 126.1

Governing Effective Slenderness Ratio:KL/r = 119.9 < Cc = 126.1 Therefore, use EQN E2-1 [AISC]

Utilization:fc: 0.00 ksi < Fc: 10.3 ksi OK 0.0%

Flexure Check - Strong Axis [AISC Spec. F1]: Fbx = 0.6Fy

Utilization:fbx: 2.48 ksi < Fbx: 22 ksi OK 11.5%

Flexure Check - Weak Axis [AISC Spec. F2]: Fby = 0.75Fy

Utilization:fby: 0.11 ksi < Fby: 27 ksi OK 0.4%

Page 27: A Tram Stop For Vancouver

27

DEPARTMENT OF ARCHITECTURESchool of Architecture and Allied ArtsUniversity of Oregon

Architecture 462/562Mark Donofrio

Winter 2012

W ShapesStructural Design - Steel Design Spreadsheet

Copyright © 2011 by Mark Donofrio 2 of 2

Designer: GTF:Ben Bye Lauren Garvey

Member ID: Typ. Girder

Combined Stress Check:Axial Compression and Bending [AISC Spec H1]:

F'ex: 67.7 ksi F'

ey: 10.4 ksiCmx: 1 Cmy: 1

AISC EQN H1-1

AISC EQN H1-2

fa/Fa: 0.00 < 0.15

AISC EQN H1-3

0.00 + 0.11 + 0.00 = 0.12 < 1.0 OK

Section is satisfactory

Axial Tension and Bending [AISC Spec H2]:

AISC EQN H2-1

Page 28: A Tram Stop For Vancouver

28

TYPICAL BRACING JOISTA-36 Steel | W6 x 9 Shape | Bracing Member

Mx-max : 2.735 k

Pmax : 0.768 k Compression

Page 29: A Tram Stop For Vancouver

29

Max Deflection: .02in

Deflection Check:

Allowable Deflection = l = 4ft x 12in/ft = 0.133in 360 360 Allowable Deflection: 0.133in > Max Deflection: 0.02in

passes deflection check

Page 30: A Tram Stop For Vancouver

30

DEPARTMENT OF ARCHITECTURESchool of Architecture and Allied ArtsUniversity of Oregon

Architecture 462/562Mark Donofrio

Winter 2012

W ShapesStructural Design - Steel Design Spreadsheet

Copyright © 2011 by Mark Donofrio 1 of 2

Designer: GTF:Ben Bye Lauren Garvey

Material Properties: Section Properties:Steel Type: A36 Section: W6X9

Fy: 36 ksi Area: 2.68 in2

Fu: 58 ksiE: 29000 ksi Axis X-X (Strong Axis) Axis Y-Y (Weak Axis)

Ix: 16.4 in4 Iy: 2.2 in4

Sx: 5.56 in3 Sy: 1.11 in3

rx: 2.47 in ry: 0.905 in

Member Data:Member ID: Typ. Brace JoistAxial Properties (Column Buckling):

Unbraced Length - X-Axis: 4 ft Unbraced Length - Y-Axis: 4 ftK-Condition: a K-Condition: aK-Value: 0.65 K-Value: 0.65

Member Loads: Axial Compression P: 0.768 kipsMoment - Strong Axis: Mx MAX: 2.735 kip-ftMoment - Weak Axis: My MAX: 0.02 kip-ft

Axial - Tension Check [AISC Spec D1]:Utilization:

ft: N/A ksi Ft: 22 ksi N/A

Axial - Compression Check [AISC Spec E2]:

Strong Axis - X: Weak Axis - X:KL/rx: 12.6 KL/rx: 34.5 <-- Governs

Cc: 126.1

Governing Effective Slenderness Ratio:KL/r = 34.5 < Cc = 126.1 Therefore, use EQN E2-1 [AISC]

Utilization:fc: 0.29 ksi < Fc: 19.6 ksi OK 1.5%

Flexure Check - Strong Axis [AISC Spec. F1]: Fbx = 0.6Fy

Utilization:fbx: 5.90 ksi < Fbx: 22 ksi OK 27.3%

Flexure Check - Weak Axis [AISC Spec. F2]: Fby = 0.75Fy

Utilization:fby: 0.22 ksi < Fby: 27 ksi OK 0.8%

Page 31: A Tram Stop For Vancouver

31

DEPARTMENT OF ARCHITECTURESchool of Architecture and Allied ArtsUniversity of Oregon

Architecture 462/562Mark Donofrio

Winter 2012

W ShapesStructural Design - Steel Design Spreadsheet

Copyright © 2011 by Mark Donofrio 2 of 2

Designer: GTF:Ben Bye Lauren Garvey

Member ID: Typ. Brace Joist

Combined Stress Check:Axial Compression and Bending [AISC Spec H1]:

F'ex: 935.9 ksi F'

ey: 125.6 ksiCmx: 1 Cmy: 1

AISC EQN H1-1

AISC EQN H1-2

fa/Fa: 0.01 < 0.15

AISC EQN H1-3

0.01 + 0.27 + 0.01 = 0.30 < 1.0 OK

Section is satisfactory

Axial Tension and Bending [AISC Spec H2]:

AISC EQN H2-1