a study on traffic management measure at ......ring road passes along the mrts line and connects...
TRANSCRIPT
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 686 [email protected]
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET)
Volume 8, Issue 8, August 2017, pp. 686–697, Article ID: IJCIET_08_08_069
Available online at http://http://www.iaeme.com/ijciet/issues.asp?JType=IJCIET&VType=8&IType=8
ISSN Print: 0976-6308 and ISSN Online: 0976-6316
© IAEME Publication Scopus Indexed
A STUDY ON TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT
MEASURE AT VIJAYANAGAR INTERSECTION
–VELACHERY
Edwin. A
Dept. of Civil Engineering, SRM University, Chennai, India
M. Jemimah Carmichael
Dept. of Civil Engineering, Karunya University, Coimbatore, India
D. Justus Reymond
Dept. of Civil Engineering, SRM University, Chennai, India
K. Prasanna
Dept. of Civil Engineering, SRM University, Chennai, India
S. Ramesh
Dept. of Civil Engineering, SRM University, Chennai, India
ABSTRACT
Transportation has always been a crucial aspect of human civilization, but it is
only in the second half of the last century that the phenomenon of traffic congestion
has become predominant due to the rapid increase in the number of vehicles and in
the transportation demand in virtually all transportation modes.
The Government has taken initiatives to develop the National Highways at the rate
of about 20 km per day (i.e. about 7,300 km per year). Accordingly, an Average
project implementation period of about 3 years, works of about 20,000 km is to be in
progress at any point of time. Tamil Nadu is having a total road length of 1,99,040 km
Tamil Nadu has about 14257 km of Highways network which is designated as
National Highways and State Highways on the basis of traffic intensity and
connectivity. There are 25 national highways in Tamil Nadu out of which 12 national
highways runs within Tamil Nadu. Tamil Nadu has an extensive road network. State
road network covers about 153 km per 100 km2 area, which is higher than the
country's average road network coverage of 103 km per 10 km2 area.
Key words: National Highways, Highways network, State Highways, traffic intensity
and connectivity.
A Study on Traffic Management Measure at Vijayanagar Intersection–Velachery
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 687 [email protected]
Cite this Article: Edwin. A, M. Jemimah Carmichael, D. Justus Reymond, K.
Prasanna and S. Ramesh, A Study on Traffic Management Measure at Vijayanagar
Intersection–Velachery. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology,
8(8), 2017, pp. 686–697.
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/issues.asp?JType=IJCIET&VType=8&IType=8
1. INTRODUCTION
The rapid growth of Velachery as a commercial and residential hub, could be attributed to its
geographical advantage in terms of the connectivity to other parts of the city. The Velachery
main road on the south, connects the fastest growing suburbs of south Chennai and Mount
Road (Anna Salai) at Guindy via Velachery. A section of this road connects Guindy and
Velachery and is home to some of the oldest localities. The 100 ft Bye-pass road connects
Guindy on the north west. The Taramani link road on the north east connects Velachery with
Rajiv Gandhi Salai (OMR). The Jawaharlal Nehru Salai also called the 100 ft road or Inner
Ring Road passes along the MRTS line and connects near the airport the GST road, an arterial
road in Chennai. The Taramani Link Road in Velachery also connects to MGR Salai, an
arterial road that connects to OMR. Velachery, comes under the Taluk of Mambalam-Guindy
in Chennai District
Figure 1 Opposite side of Velachery- Vijayanagar bus terminus.
Figure 2 Aerial View of Vijayanagar Junction. Figure 3 Google map shows Velachery area in Chennai.
Edwin. A, M. Jemimah Carmichael, D. Justus Reymond, K. Prasanna and S. Ramesh
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 688 [email protected]
The growth of Velachery during the last decade can be cited due to the growth of the IT
sector in South Chennai. It acts as an important hub connecting the rapidly growing business
class Information Technology corridor popularly called OMR; the more mature and well-
connected GST road and the Central Business Districts of the city, which has more relevance
to the history of Chennai. Velachery as a whole draws a perfect balance between Old and
New Chennai and is a phenomenon in terms of growth. The infrastructure of Velachery is a
reflection of the lessons learnt from old Chennai and a glimpse of new Chennai.
1.1. Need for the Study
Road traffic has been growing a very rapid rate in India during the past three decades. The
number of motor vehicles has been growing at a rate around 10 percent per annum. The
growth rate of various vehicle classes has been as under:
Cars : 7.5 percent
Buses : 5.3 percent
Trucks : 6.2 percent
Two wheelers : 17.2 percent
As a result of the steep growth of motor vehicle population, the traffic on the roads has
been increasing, both in terms of volume and intensity. The investments on roads have not
kept pace with the growth of traffic, with the result there is severe congestion on the roads.
Speeds are low and vehicle operating costs are high. Accident rate is also usually high. Traffic
engineering measures provide a valuable tool to understand the problems and evolve suitable
measure to overcome the deficiencies.
1.2. Scope of the Work
To reduce the traffic congestions in and around the Vijayanagar junction, Velachery.
To introduce and make use of new alternate routes in and around Vijayanagar junction,
Velachery.
Can avoid new construction of 2 way bridges.
To make the traffic flow in a uniform manner, without having any stops at an intermediates.
To give drivers and passengers, a smooth, tension- free and safe driving.
1.3. Objectives of the Work
To identify the issues regarding traffic congestion in the study area.
To conduct the traffic volume survey at Vijayanagar
To analyze the traffic data.
To suggest the suitable traffic management measures by reducing the conflict points in the
Vijayanagar junction.
A Study on Traffic Management Measure at Vijayanagar Intersection–Velachery
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 689 [email protected]
2. ANALYSIS OF DATA
2.1. Traffic Volume Counts: Location 1
Table 1 Shows the Vehicles turning left from Vijayanagar Junction
Vehicles Turning Left. Location 1: From Hotel Milan.
Time (hrs) Car, Auto,
3 Wheelers Bus Truck
Motor- Cycles
& Scooters Total
PCUs
Total
7.00- 7.30 12 6 4 30 52 57
7.30- 8.00 25 11 2 47 85 87.5
8.00- 8.30 55 17 3 40 115 135
8.30- 9.00 65 6 3 40 114 112
9.00- 9.30 75 7 7 50 139 142
9.30- 10.00 90 5 2 95 192 158.5
10.00- 10.30 53 3 5 50 111 102
10.30- 11.00 58 5 3 40 106 102
11.00- 11.30 45 3 3 33 84 79.5
11.30- 12.00 35 2 1 28 66 58
12.00- 12.30 29 1 2 22 54 49
12.30- 13.00 25 0 4 20 49 47
13.00- 13.30 22 2 3 17 44 45.5
13.30- 14.00 20 0 0 18 38 29
14.00- 14.30 18 1 1 15 35 31.5
14.30- 15.00 15 0 1 20 36 28
15.00- 15.30 21 1 0 45 67 46.5
15.30- 16.00 35 5 1 63 104 84.5
16.00- 16.30 50 3 3 56 112 96
16.30- 17.00 65 7 4 65 141 130.5
17.00- 17.30 70 5 2 72 149 127
17.30- 18.00 70 3 2 95 170 132.5
18.00- 18.30 80 5 5 127 217 173.5
18.30- 19.00 85 3 3 145 236 175
19.00- 19.30 90 2 2 151 245 177.5
19.30- 20.00 95 2 1 150 248 179
Graph for Location 1 Phase Diagram
177.5
0
50
100
150
200
7.0
0-7
.30
8.0
0-8
.30
9.0
0-9
.30
10
.00
-10
.30
11
.00
-11
.30
12
.00
-12
.30
13
.00
-13
.30
14
.00
-14
.30
15
.00
-15
.30
16
.00
-16
.30
17
.00
-17
.30
18
.00
-18
.30
19
.00
-19
.30
PC
Us
TOTA
L
TIME
Edwin. A, M. Jemimah Carmichael, D. Justus Reymond, K. Prasanna and S. Ramesh
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 690 [email protected]
2.2. Traffic Volume Counts: Location 2
Table 2 Shows the Vehicles moving straight from Vijayanagar Junction.
Vehicles moving straight. Location 2: From CADD Centre.
Time (hrs) Car, Auto, 3
Wheelers Bus Truck
Motor- Cycles
& Scooters Total
PCUs
Total
7.00- 7.30 117 10 5 125 257 224.5
7.30- 8.00 122 7 7 115 251 221.5
8.00- 8.30 191 12 7 160 370 328
8.30- 9.00 237 7 11 160 415 371
9.00- 9.30 275 5 5 220 505 415
9.30- 10.00 300 4 7 200 511 433
10.00- 10.30 280 5 3 197 485 402.5
10.30- 11.00 252 8 5 170 435 376
11.00- 11.30 200 3 4 160 367 301
11.30- 12.00 135 4 3 145 287 228.5
12.00- 12.30 121 2 5 133 261 208.5
12.30- 13.00 112 3 3 125 243 192.5
13.00- 13.30 100 3 5 115 223 181.5
13.30- 14.00 136 1 2 100 239 195
14.00- 14.30 181 2 3 90 276 241
14.30- 15.00 166 4 5 80 255 233
15.00- 15.30 185 2 7 75 269 249.5
15.30- 16.00 204 7 3 97 311 282.5
16.00- 16.30 230 2 8 120 360 320
16.30- 17.00 250 9 5 140 404 362
17.00- 17.30 265 11 1 165 442 383.5
17.30- 18.00 300 7 2 180 489 417
18.00- 18.30 315 7 4 200 526 448
18.30- 19.00 325 5 2 215 547 453.5
19.00- 19.30 348 4 0 209 561 464.5
19.30- 20.00 308 5 3 185 501 424.5
Graph 2 for Location 2 Phase Diagram
464.5
0
100
200
300
400
500
PC
Us
TOTA
L
TIME
A Study on Traffic Management Measure at Vijayanagar Intersection–Velachery
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 691 [email protected]
2.3. Traffic Volume Counts: Location 3
Table 3 Shows the Vehicles turning right from Vijayanagar Junction
Vehicles Turning Right. Location 3: From Velachery Dhaneeshwaram Road.
Time Car, Auto, 3
Wheelers Bus Truck
Motor- Cycles
& Scooters Total
PCUs
Total
7.00- 7.30 63 7 1 60 131 117
7.30- 8.00 75 18 3 60 156 168
8.00- 8.30 93 12 5 90 200 189
8.30- 9.00 104 13 5 80 202 198
9.00- 9.30 100 12 5 100 217 201
9.30- 10.00 127 11 4 55 197 199.5
10.00- 10.30 101 8 5 100 214 190
10.30- 11.00 110 12 4 90 216 203
11.00- 11.30 92 10 2 75 179 165.5
11.30- 12.00 70 8 1 60 139 127
12.00- 12.30 72 5 3 50 130 121
12.30- 13.00 60 5 5 43 113 111.5
13.00- 13.30 62 4 2 38 106 99
13.30- 14.00 45 3 1 32 81 73
14.00- 14.30 40 2 1 25 68 65.1
14.30- 15.00 35 2 2 20 59 57
15.00- 15.30 53 4 2 35 94 885
15.30- 16.00 62 7 5 50 124 123
16.00- 16.30 75 5 8 75 163 151.5
16.30- 17.00 90 12 3 90 195 180
17.00- 17.30 95 13 5 103 216 200.5
17.30- 18.00 121 9 7 124 261 231
18.00- 18.30 147 12 9 153 321 286.5
18.30- 19.00 152 16 7 166 341 304
19.00- 19.30 177 7 7 176 367 307
19.30- 20.00 183 6 6 175 370 306.5
Graph 3 for Location 3 Phase Diagram
307
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
PC
Us
TOTA
L
TIME
Edwin. A, M. Jemimah Carmichael, D. Justus Reymond, K. Prasanna and S. Ramesh
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 692 [email protected]
2.4. Traffic Volume Counts: Location 4
Table 4 Shows the Vehicles moving Straight from Vijayanagar Junction.
Vehicles moving straight. Location 4: From Hotel Anjappar.
Time Car, Auto,
3 Wheelers Bus Truck
Motor- Cycles
& Scooters Total
PCUs
Total
7.00- 7.30 75 28 14 105 222 253.5
7.30- 8.00 120 33 17 137 307 338.5
8.00- 8.30 280 29 23 340 672 606
8.30- 9.00 265 43 43 381 732 713.5
9.00- 9.30 375 45 10 387 817 733.5
9.30- 10.00 303 37 11 376 727 635
10.00- 10.30 273 31 14 297 615 556.5
10.30- 11.00 233 28 6 270 537 470
11.00- 11.30 140 17 6 160 323 289
11.30- 12.00 135 5 4 145 289 234.5
12.00- 12.30 120 6 5 133 264 219.5
12.30- 13.00 102 7 3 105 217 184.5
13.00- 13.30 100 4 5 87 196 170.5
13.30- 14.00 115 7 2 92 216 188
14.00- 14.30 100 4 3 65 172 153.5
14.30- 15.00 75 3 3 60 141 123
15.00- 15.30 85 8 6 75 174 164.5
15.30- 16.00 112 3 4 97 216 181.5
16.00- 16.30 120 12 7 120 259 237
16.30- 17.00 150 14 2 140 306 268
17.00- 17.30 165 13 1 165 344 289.5
17.30- 18.00 187 17 1 180 385 331
18.00- 18.30 215 16 2 230 463 384
18.30- 19.00 203 6 7 225 441 354.5
19.00- 19.30 218 10 6 299 533 415.5
19.30- 20.00 200 9 5 275 489 379.5
Graph 4 for Location 4 Phase Diagram
733.5
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
PC
Us
TOTA
L
TIME
A Study on Traffic Management Measure at Vijayanagar Intersection–Velachery
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 693 [email protected]
2.5. Traffic Volume Counts: Location 5
Table 5 Shows the Vehicles turning right from Vijayanagar Junction
Vehicles turning right. Location 5: From Velachery Byepass road.
Time Car, Auto, 3
Wheelers Bus Truck
Motor- Cycles
& Scooters Total
PCUs
Total
7.00- 7.30 25 8 1 39 73 71.5
7.30- 8.00 37 10 3 50 100 101
8.00- 8.30 43 12 5 56 116 122
8.30- 9.00 65 11 5 60 141 143
9.00- 9.30 69 9 5 71 154 146.5
9.30- 10.00 63 10 4 69 146 139.5
10.00- 10.30 71 14 5 87 177 171.5
10.30- 11.00 81 12 4 19 116 174
11.00- 11.30 61 11 2 75 149 137.5
11.30- 12.00 36 8 1 60 105 93
12.00- 12.30 41 5 3 50 99 90
12.30- 13.00 43 5 5 43 96 94.5
13.00- 13.30 24 4 2 38 68 61
13.30- 14.00 25 3 1 32 61 53
14.00- 14.30 31 2 1 25 59 52.5
14.30- 15.00 35 2 2 30 69 57
15.00- 15.30 43 4 2 35 84 78.5
15.30- 16.00 32 7 5 50 94 93
16.00- 16.30 65 5 8 75 153 141.5
16.30- 17.00 82 12 3 90 187 172
17.00- 17.30 95 13 5 103 216 200.5
17.30- 18.00 80 8 7 122 217 186
18.00- 18.30 101 10 9 151 271 233.5
18.30- 19.00 90 9 7 161 267 218.5
19.00- 19.30 85 11 7 172 275 225
19.30- 20.00 83 5 6 171 265 201.5
Graph 5 for Location 5 Phase Diagram
233.5
0
50
100
150
200
250
PC
Us
TOTA
L
TIME
Edwin. A, M. Jemimah Carmichael, D. Justus Reymond, K. Prasanna and S. Ramesh
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 694 [email protected]
2.6. Traffic Volume Counts: Location 6
Table 6 Shows the Vehicles turning right from Velachery Signal.
Vehicles turning right. Location 6: From Velachery Signal.
Time Car, Auto, 3
Wheelers Bus Truck
Motor- Cycles &
Scooters Total
PCUs
Total
7.00- 7.30 115 8 5 125 253 216.5
7.30- 8.00 120 7 7 165 299 244.5
8.00- 8.30 190 9 7 260 466 368
8.30- 9.00 265 15 10 285 575 482.5
9.00- 9.30 275 15 10 399 699 549.5
9.30- 10.00 235 12 5 220 472 396
10.00- 10.30 415 5 5 288 713 589
10.30- 11.00 280 13 10 370 673 534
11.00- 11.30 200 6 1 160 367 301
11.30- 12.00 135 5 0 145 285 222.5
12.00- 12.30 120 2 2 133 257 198.5
12.30- 13.00 112 2 0 125 239 180.5
13.00- 13.30 100 1 0 115 216 160.5
13.30- 14.00 85 0 0 80 165 125
14.00- 14.30 80 1 2 90 173 134
14.30- 15.00 65 4 0 80 149 117
15.00- 15.30 67 3 0 75 145 113.5
15.30- 16.00 122 1 1 97 221 176.5
16.00- 16.30 105 5 10 120 240 210
16.30- 17.00 250 13 6 177 446 395.5
17.00- 17.30 265 9 4 254 532 431
17.30- 18.00 300 3 5 280 588 464
18.00- 18.30 315 9 7 300 631 513
18.30- 19.00 325 12 7 317 661 540.5
19.00- 19.30 348 6 3 309 666 529.5
19.30- 20.00 300 6 1 385 692 513.5
Graph 6 for Location 6. Phase Diagram
589
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
PC
Us
TOTA
L
TIME
A Study on Traffic Management Measure at Vijayanagar Intersection–Velachery
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 695 [email protected]
3. CONGESTION AREA IN VELACHERY
Figure 4 shows the Congestion area in Velachery
The frenzied traffic movement at Vijayanagar intersection in Velachery may soon be a
thing of the past with the state highways department planning to build a multi-level flyover at
the busy junction. STUP Consultants Limited has been appointed to conduct a detailed study
and come up with a report on traffic pattern, project design and cost estimates. The flyover
will cater to the huge vehicular population coming in from the suburbs. The Vijaya Nagar
intersection is at the confluence of Velachery Bypass, Taramani Link Road, Velachery Main
Road and the Velachery-Tambaram High Road. With growth in real estate in the recent years,
traffic has become chaotic. The MTC bus terminus at the junction adds to the congestion.
Pedestrian movement has been badly hit due to more people using private transport.
3.1. Traffic Volume Increasing in Velachery
Table 7 Traffic volume increasing in Velachery
Year 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
PCUs 2890 3212 3680 4122 4616 5169 5788
PCUs in future
6433 7133 7881 8677
3.2. Road Measurement in Velachery
The growth of Velachery during the last decade can be cited due to the growth of the IT sector
in south Chennai. It acts as an important hub connecting the rapidly growing business class
Information Technology corridor popularly called OMR; the more mature and well-connected
GST road and the Central Business Districts of the city, which has more relevance to the
history of Chennai. Velachery as a whole draws a perfect balance between Old and New
Chennai and is a phenomenon in terms of growth. The infrastructure of Velachery is a
reflection of the lessons learnt from old Chennai and a glimpse of new Chennai.
Figure 5 Road measurement in Velachery Junction.
Edwin. A, M. Jemimah Carmichael, D. Justus Reymond, K. Prasanna and S. Ramesh
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 696 [email protected]
Figure 6 Road measurement in Velachery study area.
3.3. Present Velachery Routs
The Velachery main road on the south connects the fastest growing suburbs of south Chennai
and Mount Road (Anna Salai) at Guindy via Velachery.
A section of this road connects Guindy and Velachery and is home to some of the oldest
localities.
The 100 ft By-pass road connects Guindy on the North West.
The Taramani link road on the north east connects Velachery with Rajiv Gandhi Salai (OMR).
The Jawaharlal Nehru Salai also called the 100 ft road or Inner Ring Road passes along the
MRTS line and connects near the airport the GST road, an arterial road in Chennai. The
Taramani Link Road in Velachery also connects to MGR Salai, an arterial road that connects
to OMR. Velachery comes under the Taluk of Mambalam-Guindy in Chennai District.
3.4. Traffic Management Measure at Velachery using Roads
Figure 7 Traffic Management Measure at Velachery using Roads
A Study on Traffic Management Measure at Vijayanagar Intersection–Velachery
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 697 [email protected]
4. CONCLUSIONS
The conclusion of this work is to provide congestion less traffic movement. This is done by
removing the signals and by diverting the routes and also by closing the side roads. This
provides us less journey time with more satisfaction. This ensures safety and reduces
accidents. This provides a uniform flow of traffic with no chaos and congestion.
5. SUMMARY
Traffic intersections are problem spots on any highway, which contribute to a large share of
accidents. For safe operation, these locations should be kept under some level of control
depending upon the traffic quantity and behaviour. Based on this, intersections and
interchanges are constructed. This is studied and analyzed at Velachery intersection.
REFERENCE
[1] Journal of Emerging Trends in Computing and Information Sciences
http://www.cisjournal.org
[2] Mateen, S.M.; “Estimating and Relieving Urban Congestion”, Seminar Report R.E.C.
Warangal.
[3] Vehicular growth and its management: Visakhapatnam city in India– A case study S. S. S.
V. Gopala Raju, K. V. G. D. Balaji and K. Durga Rani.
[4] Central Road Research Institute, “Traffic Congestion on Selected arterials in Delhi – A
Review”, Central Road Research Institute, New Delhi, 1986.
[5] Central Road Research Institute, “Capacity of Roads in Urban Areas”, Final Report of the
Project Sponsored by Ministry of Surface Transport, India, 1988.
[6] Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, Vol. 6, pp. 2291 - 2306,
2005. Franklyn T. AMISTAD, Jose Regin F. REGIDOR, Dr. Eng.
[7] Study of the effect of traffic volume and road width on PCE value of vehicles using
microscopic simulation V. THAMIZH ARASAN and K. KRISHNAMURTHY.
[8] Engineering Letters, 14:1, EL_14_1_12 (Advance online publication: 12 February 2007)
Carpooling: A Step to Reduce Congestion (A Case Study of Delhi) KUM KUM DEWAN
and ISRARAHMAD.
[9] Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 6(5): 529-542, 2010 © 2010, INSInet Publication
Corresponding Author: Olayiwola Ademola Gbolahan Oni Ph.D.
[10] ITPI journal 4: 2 (2007) 52 – 59, spaces of mobility in the city Centre, Bangalore – the
role and impact of transportation infrastructure MAMATHA P. RAJ, MADHU CHAND
K.R.
[11] IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering (IOSR-JMCE), ISSN: 2278-1684
Volume 4, Issue 5 (Nov. - Dec. 2012), PP 23-27, www.iosrjournals.org.
[12] EXCEL International Journal of Multidisciplinary Management Studies Vol.2 Issue 7,
July 2012, ISSN 2249 8834 Online available at http://zenithresearch.org.in.
[13] European Transport \ Trasporti Europei (2012) Issue 52, Paper no 5, ISSN 1825-3997.
Urban Transport in India: Issues, Challenges, and the Way Forward SANJAY KUMAR
SINGH.
[14] Sandeep Panchal and Lalit Singh Rawat. Pattern of Road Traffic Accident: A Case Study
of Hamirpur District in Himachal Pradesh (H.P). International Journal of Mechanical
Engineering and Technology, 8(2), 2017, pp. 194–197.
[15] Dr.S.Ramachandran and S.Aravindan An Analysis of Traffic, Transportation And
Operations of Nargolport, India–A Case Study. International Journal of Civil Engineering
and Technology, 8(6), 2017, pp. 465–476.