a study of brand equity and institutional image … study of brand equity and institutional... · a...
TRANSCRIPT
A STUDY OF BRAND EQUITY AND INSTITUTIONAL IMAGE BETWEEN TWO HIGHER EDUCATIONAL
INSTITUTIONS
Lai HueyYih
HF 5415.3 L185 lOll Corporate Master in Business Administration
2012
Pusat Khidmat Maklumat Akademik UNlVERSm MALAYSIA SARAWAK
P.KHIOMAT MAKLUMAT AKAOEMIK
11111 1llllli'iiill 11111111 1000245998
A STUDY OF BRAND EQUITY AND INSTITUTIONAL IMAGE BETWEEN TWO HIGHER EDUCATIONAL
INSTITUTIONS
LAIHUEYYIH
A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Corporate Master in Business Administration
Faculty of Economics and Business UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA SARA W AK
2012
I
1
I
APPROVAL PAGE
I certify that I have supervised and read this study and that in my opinion it confonns to
acceptable standards of scholarly presentation and is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a
research paper for the degree of Corporate Master in Business Administration
Prof. Dr Ernest Cyril De Run Supervisor
This research paper was submitted to the Faculty of Economics and Business, UNIMAS and
is accepted as partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Corporate Master in
Business Administration.
Prof. Dr Shazali Abu Mansor Dean, Faculty of Economics and Business
11
---------~
STATEMENT OF ORIGINALITY
The work described in this Research Paper, entitled • I
I "A STUDY OF BRAND EQUITY AND INSTITUTIONAL IMAGE
BETWEEN TWO HIGHER EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS"
is to the best of the author's knowledge that of the author except
where due reference is made.
~~VL-Date LAIHOtYYIH
(10031734)
111
,.. I
ABSTRACT
A STUDY OF BRAND EQUITY AND INSTITUTIONAL IMAGE
BETWEEN TWO HIGHER EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS
By
LAIHUEYYIH
( ThiS study aims to investigate the brand equity and institutional image of two higher
educational institutions to determine if there is a difference between both variables between . the two higher educational institutions. Apart from that, it is also the interest of the study to
find out if there is a difference in parents' and students' view on brand equity and institutional
image The results revealed that brand equity and institutional image between both institutions
are different. Results also revealed that parents and students have different perception towards
the brand equity and institutional image of institutions. Implications towards marketing of the
institutions shall be considered . ..
iv
1
ABSTRAK
KAJIAN MENGENAl EKUITI JENAMA DAN IMEJ INSTITUSI ANT ARA DUA INSTITUSI PENDIDlKAN TINGGI
Oleh
LAIHUEYYIH
Kajian ini mengkaji mengenai ekuiti jenama dan imej institusi antara dua institusi pendidikan
tinggi untuk menentukan samada perbezaan wujud antara kedua-dua pembolehubah di antara
kedua-dua institusi pendidikan tinggi yang di~aji. Di samping itu, kajian turut mengkaji
samada perbezaan wujud antara persepsi ibu-bapa dan pelajar terhadap ekuitijenama dan imej
institusi. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan bahawa ekuiti jenama dan imej institusi antara kedua
dua institusi pendidikan tinggi adalah berbeza. Keputusan turut menunjukkan bahawa persepsi
ibu-bapa dan pelajar terhadap ekuiti jenama dan imej institusi adalah berbeza. Implikasi
terhadap pemasaran institusi pendidikan tinggi harus dipertimbangkan.
v
-
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Thousands of gratitude should be addressed to many people who have contributed in making
this research paper a success. To the following individuals, I am grateful for their valuable
contributions.
First and foremost, I would like to address my appreciation to Prof. Dr Ernest Cyril De Run.
As the supervisor for my study, he provided me with multiple expert advice and assistance in
carrying out the research. I am grateful for his great patience and guidance which has brought
me thus far.
I would also like to thank the respondents who willingly spare their time to answer my
questionnaire. Their cooperation has given me sufficient data to be analyzed. Without their
cooperation, I would not have been able to continue with the research.
Appreciation shall also be addressed to those in the Faculty of Economics and Business,
UNIMAS. Their dedications in carrying out their responsibilities made this course a success
... thus giving me an opportunity to better equip myself with knowledge.
My sincere gratitude shall also go to the other individuals which I have not named. Their
contributions have led me to a success in completing the research paper.
vi
I
II
Pusat Khidmat Maklumat Akademik UNI VERSlTI MALAYSIA SARAWAK
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Approval Page 11
Abstract lV
Acknowledgements Vl
List of Tables Xl
Statement of Originality iii
Abstrak v
List of Figures xiii
Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Introduction
1.l.l Brand Equity 2
1.1.2 Institutional Image 3
1.1.3 Brand Equity, Institutional Image and Higher
Educational Institutions 3
1.2 Theoretical Framework 5
.' 1.2.1 Theory of Planned Behavior 6
1.2.2 Predicting Intentions: Attitudes, Subjective Norms and
Perceived Behavioral Control 6
1.3 Problem Statement 9
1.4 Research Objectives 10
1.4.1 General Objectives 10
1.4.2 Specific Objective(s) 11
vii
TABLE OF CONTENTS (CON'T)
1.5 Rationale of the Study
1.6 Research Scope
1.7 Limitations of the Research
1.8 Summary
I'
Chapter 2 LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Brand Equity
2.2.1 Brand Equity and Education
2.3 Institutional Image
2.3.1 Institutional Image and Education
Chapter 3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Conceptual Framework
3.3 Population
'" 3.4 Sample
3.5 Research Design Overview
3.6 Main Research Instrument
3.7 Research Measurements
3.8 Data Collection Method
3.9 Data Analysis
3.10 Research Hypotheses
Vlll
I
i
I 11
12
13
14
15 i 15
17
18
18
: 21
21
22
23
23
24
24
25 I I
26
28 I I
TABLE OF CONTENTS (CON'T)
Chapter 4 FINDINGS
4.1 Introduction 32
4.2 Profile of Respondents 32
4.3 Reliability of Variables 33
4.4 Means of Variables by Categories 34
4.5 Findings of ANOV A 35
4.6 Findings ofT-Test 35
4.7 Summary of Findings 39
Chapter 5 DISCUSSIONS OF FINDINGS
5.1 Introduction 43
5.2 Difference between Both Institutions 43
5.3 Difference between Parents and Students for Each Institution 45
5.4 Difference between Parents and Students between Each Institution 46
5.5 Summary 48
.' Chapter 6 CONCLUSIONS
6.1 Introduction 49
6.2 Conclusion 49
6.3 Managerial Implication 50
6.4 Theoretical Implication 51
6.5 Future Studies 52
ix
_ _ 111:::=====. ---..-.-------~-------------------~-
I
TABLE OF CONTENTS (CON'T)
REFERENCES 54
APPENDIX I: Sample Questionnaire (UNlMAS - Parents) xiv
APPENDIX II: Sample Questionnaire (UNIMAS - Students) xviii
APPENDIX ill: Sample Questionnaire (KLT - Parents) xxii
APPENDIX IV: Sample Questionnaire (KLT - Students) xxvi
x
LIST OF TABLES
Page
Table 4.1 Respondents Profile 33
Table 4.2 Reliability of Variables 33
Table 4.3 Means of Variables by Category for Each Institution 34
Table 4.4 Means of Variables by Category for Institutions, Students
and Parents 34
Table 4.5 ANOVA of Variables by Category of Respondents 35
Table 4.6 T -Test of Variables for Small Institution versus Large Institution 35
Table 4.7 T-Test of Variables for Small Institution Students versus
Small'Institution Parents 36
Table 4.8 T-Test of Variables for Large Institution Students versus
Large Institution Parents 36
Xl
LIST OF TABLES (CON'T)
Page
Table 4.9 T-Test of Variables for Small Institution Students versus
Large Institution Students 37
Table 4.10 T-Test of Variables for Small Institution Parents versus
Large Institution Parents 38
Table 4.11 Summary of Results Obtained by Category of Respondents
(From T-Test Analysis) 39
Xll
LIST OF FIGURES
Page
Figure 1.1 Theory of Planned Behavior 8
Figure 3.1 Conceptual Framework for Behavioral Intention 21
Xlll
I
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
Ll Introduction
Business environment has become more competitive today. Each business is continuously
trying to design marketing strategy in order to sustain in the competitive environment. In
order to be competitive, fIrms are increasing their efforts in the creation and development of
brands (Rio, Vazquez & Iglesias, 2001). Rising from this phenomenon is the importance of
branding. Branding has emerged as a top management priority in the last decade due to the
growing realization that brands are one of the most valuable intangible assets that fIrms have
(KeUer & Lehmann, 2006). Despite commonly being regarded as the look of a product or an
institution, a brand is more than looks but it is also a trustmark, a warrant, and a promise
(Sevier, n.d.). Brands serves several valuable functions such as being the ll:lrkers for the
offerings of a firm, helps to simply choice for customers, promise a particular quality level,
reduce risk and/or engender trust (Keller & Lehmann, 2006). With more fIrms realizing the
importance of brand, fIrms work to make their brand popular and known causing consumers
to be thrown with numerous brand names when it comes to picking a single item. Hence, by
focusing efforts on branding, a fIrm tries to get their product or institution included in the
choice set (Sevier, n.d.).
The service industry also considers brands and branding to be important. Turley and Moore
(1995) noted that the brand has been increasingly recognized as an important determinant of
consumer choice in the service sector. However, it is more difficult to evaluate a service
before experiencing it due to the unique characteristics of a service and different interpretation
~I
of an experience by individual consumers (Mourad, Enner & Kortam, 2010). Thus, the
importance of brand is to serve as a risk reliever, providing consumers with more confident
assurance and trust (Erdem & Swait, 1998).
1.1.1 Brand Equity
Previous researches made a variety of defmitions to the term brand equity. Brand equity is the
effect of the brand on the consumer response to the marketing activities associated with a
particular product (Keller, 1993). A customer sees brand equity as representation of attributes
such as better product performance, stronger risk reduction, lower information costs and a
positive image of the product (Mourad, Ennew & Kortam, 2010). To a firm, brand equity
represents attributes such as lower fmancial risk, incremental cash flow, higher rent, higher
entry barriers, lower marketing and distribution' costs for extensions and protection from
imitation via trade marketing (De Moji, 1993). For employees, brand equity reflects
uniqueness of company brand associations, brand consistency, brand creditability and brand
clarity (Supornpraditchai et al., 2007). Regardless of any definitions, brand equity in general
has to do with associations on attributes of a brand. Brand equity is significant in assisting
consumers to process information especially when the information is overloaded (Krishan &
Hartline, 200 I). In ord'er for an organization to have a st~ong brand, brand equity plays an
important role where marketers it are provided with an essential strategic bridge from the
organization's past to the future (Keller, 2003).
2
1.1.2 Institutional Image
Institutional image, like brand equity, is an important element that helps to attract and retain
customers. As suggested by Kotler and Fox (1995), the image and reputation of an institution
is more essential than quality as potential customers made their choices based on perceived
image. Thus, image can be very influential when it comes to persuading customers to make
the choice. As defined by Bone (2009), an institutional image is the opinions and perceptions
that customers hold on the institution that can become factors that triggers customers to make
the institution as their choice. Barich and Kotler (1991), on the other hand, explained that
institutional image as the overall impression of an organization which exists in the mind of the
consumers. The overall impression is usually generated from the physical and behavioral
attributes of the organization. The institutional image of an organization will not be the same
to all public but differs to different categories' of consumers reflective of their specific
experience with the organization (Gray, 1986). Like brand equity, when properly managed,
institutional image wil) playa critical role in customer's buying intention (Barich & Kotler,
1991). Thus, it can be generally assumed that institutional image is influential in pushing the
brand into the choice set of a customer.
1.1.3 Brand Equity, Institutional Image and Higher Educational Institutions
Education, as part of the service industry, views brand as important. As stated by Jevons
(2006), university branding and reputation management has been of concern for some time in
the USA. Argenti (2000) points out that there are hundreds of ranking scales of business
schools and that these have more effect on admissions, placement, hiring and giving than any
other single variables. Branding is important for educational institutions as branding can add
3
value to an education institution's offer and provide more satisfaction for the consumers
(Kotler & Fox, 1995).
In Malaysia, number of enrolment of tertiary students has been rapidly increasing due to the
national development (Ahmad, 1998). In response to that, tertiary education institutions in the
country also increased. As of 2009, there are around 600 private higher education institutions
and 20 public universities in Malaysia (Goi & Goi, 2009). With the huge amount of higher
educational institutions in Malaysia, branding becomes important in order to attract more
studepts to enroll to the institutions. Goi and Goi (2009) also pointed out that branding is
powerful in providing competitive advantage. Apart from that, for educational services, a
strong brand reflects a promise of future satisfaction (Berry, 2000). Rebranding which is
debated as one of the most significant brand management practice (Goi & Goi, 2009) has been
extensively practiced by the higher educational institutions in Malaysia in order to create
reputations in the local and international market (Goi & Goi, 2009). By creating and
increasing reputation of the brand, it is hoped that the institutions can be more competitive
and attract more enrolments .
..
4
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pusat I(hjdm· t M 1,1 UNIVERSm HM 3",Umat Akademik
ALAYSfA SARAWAK
1.2 Theoretical Framework
Fishbein (1980) indicated that the theory of reasoned action stemmed from describing how a
consumer leads to a certain buying behavior. The theory of reasoned action states that
attitudes towards buying and subjective norms are the antecedents of performed behavior (Ha,
1998). As quoted by Southey (2011), the theory of reasoned action offers a model that
potentially benefits the prediction of intention to perform a behavior based on a person's
attitudinal and normative beliefs.
The theory of reasoned action takes into consideration the attitude of an individual as well as
the subjective norm of the individual in predicting the individual ' s purchase intention. When
considering the attitude of an individual, it is no just the general attitude of the individual of
the product but also the attitude towards performing that behavior (Lutz, 1991). For example,
even when a person has favorable attitude towards a product, it does not mean that the person
will buy the product. The theory of reasoned action also takes into consideration the
subjective nonn which refers to the social influences in an individual ' s behavior (Lutz, 1991).
This refers to the influence of other people surrounding the individual, the individual ' s
expectations and etc towards the purchase intention. However, due to limitations to the theory,
the theory of reasoned action was later extended by accommodating developments in the
variables and renamed as the theory of planned behavior.
5
I
1.2.1 Theory of Planned Behavior
The limitation to the theory of reasoned action is that the theory did not consider the factor of
willingness of individual in their behavior. By putting this into consideration, the theory of
planned behavior was developed with the similar central factor as the theory of reasoned
action which is the individual's intention to perform a given behavior (Ajzen, 1991). As stated
by Ajzen (1991), intentions capture the influential motivational factors to a behavior. These
motivational factors will indicate the extent of willingness to try and the amount of efforts that
one planned to put in order to perform the action. Therefore, the assumption that can be
inferred is that the greater the intention to perform a behavior, the greater the chance the
behavior is performed. However, it should be clear that the behavior performed is under
volitional control where the individual can decide at will to perform the behavior (Ajzen,
1991 ). At times, individual can perform at will But some behaviors are being controlled by
some non-motivational factors such as available resources. When resources are available,
together with the intention to perform the behavior, the behavior is more than likely to be
perfomled (Ajzen, 1991). Under the theory of planned behavior, besides the two similar
antecedents of intentions i.e. attitude and subjective nonn, it also considered the third
antecedent which is the perceived behavioral control.
1.2.2 Predicting Intentions: Attitudes, Subjective Norms and Perceived Behavioral
Control
The theory of planned behavior proposed three factors leading to intention, namely attitudes
towards the behavior, subjective norm and perceived behavioral control (Ajzen, 1991).
Attitudes towards the behavior refer to whether or not an individual is in favor of the behavior
depending on the individual's evaluation towards the behavior. If an individual is .in favor of
6
the behavior, the individual will likely to perform the behavior. The greater is the degree of
favoritism towards the behavior, the greater is the intention, thus the higher the tendency the
behavior is performed and vice versa.
However subjective norms also come to play when deciding on an intention. Subjective
norms, as illustrated by Ajzen (1991), refers to the perceived social pressure to perform the
behavior or otherwise. Taking subjective norms into consideration, thus it could be said that
the degree of an individual in favor of an action is also influenced by helher social pressure
towards the behavior. If the behavior is socially unaccepted or not favored, thus the tendency
of the behavior to be performed becomes lower. However, if the behavior is socially favored,
the behavior stands at a higher chance of being performed.
In addition to attitudes towards the behavior and subjective norms, the theory of planned
behavior also included perceived behavioral control as one of the determinants of intention.
Perceived behavioral control refers 'to the perceived ease or difficulty of performing the
behavior and it is assumed to reflect past experience as well as anticipated impediments and
obstacles' (Ajzen, 1991). As postulated by Ajzen (1991), perceived behavioral control with
behavioral intention c<1:n be used to predict behavioral achievement. From this suggestion, it is
believed that the possibility of a successful performed behavior is positively related with
perceived behavioral control when behavior intention is held constant (Ajzen, 1991). Apart
from that, perceived behavioral control is often used as a substitute to measure the actual
control (Ajzen, 1991). However, perceived behavioral control may not be an accurate
indicator of intention or predictor of behavior when the individual does not have much
7
infonnation of the behavior or there are changes in the available resources of the individual or
when there are new elements to be considered for the specific situation (Ajzen, 1991).
Importance of attitudes, subjective norms and perceived behavioral control varies according to
different situations, different behaviors and different individuals (Ajzen, 1991). In some
situations, all three determinants may be important predictors while in some cases, only
attitudes and perceived behavioral control plays the role of predictors of behavior. At times,
only attitudes come into play in determining whether the behavior is to be performed or other
wise.
Attitude Toward Act or Behavior
Subjective Behavioral Behavior Nonn Intention
Perceived Behavioral Control
Figure 1.1 Theory of Planned Behavior
8
1.3 Problem Statement
Based on the theory of planned behavior, it is inevitable that attitudes towards the behavior is
a determinant of behavioral intention. Past researches have been done to examine the
relationship or impact of brands towards consumer attitudes and purchase intention. Banyte,
Joksaite and Virvilaite (2007) concluded in their studies that 'attitude could be formed or
affected by intangible attributes ofa brand'. In the study of brands, brand equity is particularly
relevant to consumer choice (Mourad, Ennew & Kortam, 2010). Mourad, Ennew and Kortam
(2010) also noted that brand equity is used as a measurement both by the organization and
consumer to evaluate the value of brand. From the perspective of a consumer, brand equity
stems from desirable attributes of the brand towards the consumer and it stands as a
foundation to build emotional bond with the consumer (Teas & Grapentine, 1996). Generally,
it can be assumed that brand equity which is viewed as measurements to attributes of a brand
may influence the attitudes of a consumer towards the brand and ihus influencing intention
behavior.
As brand equity is related to attitude towards brand, image is also related to attitude towards
brand. Researches have been done on the effect of country image towards the attitude towards
a brand (e.g.: Pappu, Quester & Cooksey, 2007). Consumers possess different attitude towards
products from different country based on the image of the country. Corporate image or
institutional image is also being researched on their influence or relationship towards attitudes
of consumers (e.g.: Nguyen & LeBlanc, 2001; Alves & Raposo, 2010). Institutional image
which also includes institutional reputation considering that reputation is the outcome of the
process of building an image is 'an aggregation process which incorporates numerous
information used in the consumer's perception of the organization' (Nguyen & LeBlanc,
9
2001). According to Nguyen and LeBlanc (2001), a consumer may already have certain
perceptions towards the institution even before having any personal experience or contact
with the institution as these perceptions may come from their evaluation towards information
gathered from the public, advertisement and etc. Nguyen and LeBlanc (2001) also noted that
consumers will rely on their perception of the institutional image which will form their
attitude towards the institution and determine their behavioral intention. This is especially
relevant to the service industry where consumers have to judge an institution and decide on
their intention before experiencing the service.
With related researches revealing the relationship of brand equity and institutional image on
the attitude of the consumers towards a product, institution or a brand, it is in the interest of
this study to investigate the brand equity and institutional image of higher educational
institutions with relevant to the consumers of higher educational institutions i.e. students and
parents.
1.4 Research Objectives
The main purpose of this study as well as its specific aims is discussed in further detail in the
following sections.
1.4.1 General Objective
The main purpose of this study is to investigate the perception of consumers towards the
brand equity and institutional image of higher education institutions. Comparison is done to
determine whether there is a difference between the brand equity and institutional image
between two institutions in the eyes of the consumers. This study also compares between
10