a spiral organic chemistry sequence, 12 years after ......intro. to all the major functional groups,...
TRANSCRIPT
A spiral organic chemistry
sequence, 12 years after
implementation
Doug Schirch
BCCE July 2018
Outline
1. Why I switched
2. Course organization
3. Cognitive psychology and the spiral
approach
4. Results of ACS final exams before and
after switch
5. Student opinions
6. Observations and other course elements
Why I switched(Thank you Dan Berger)
• 1-semester students (Biology and
Environmental Science majors)
– Miss many functional groups common in nature
(carboxylic acids, amides, esters, amines, etc.)
– Forced to learn less relevant material
• Can’t offer separate courses
• Appeal of
– More incremental difficulty during year.
– Forcing students to review in 2nd semester.
Content Organization
1st Semester 2nd Semester
Review of bonding theories, EN, etc.
Const. and geometric isomers, conformers, intro to chirality
Intro. to all the major functional groups, their nomenclature, and properties
Fundamental reactions for each functional group
Major mechanisms
Multi-step synthesis problems
Lab: Standard purification techniques, TLC, melting points, a synthesis, GC-MS
1st Semester 2nd Semester
Review of bonding theories, EN, etc.
Const. and geometric isomers, conformers, intro to chirality
More depth on nucleophilic substitution and chirality
Intro. to all the major functional groups, their nomenclature, and properties
Spectroscopy
Fundamental reactions for each functional group
Additional reactions
Major mechanisms Additional mechanisms
Multi-step synthesis problems Longer multi-step synthesis problems
Lab: Standard purification techniques, TLC, melting points, a synthesis, GC-MS
Lab: Syntheses, literature project, qualitative analysis using MS, FT-NMR, FT-IR
Content Organization
Chapters from Carey, 9e
Chap. Fall Sp. Fall Sp.
1. Structure/properties √ 12. Aromatic subst. √ √
2. Alkanes √ 13. Spectroscopy √
3. Conformations √ 14. Organometallic cmpds √ √
4. Alcohols, alkyl halides √ 15. Alcohols, thiols √ √
5. Alkenes: structure & prep. √ √ 16. Ethers, epoxides √ √
6. Alkenes: add’n rxns √ √ 17. Aldehydes, Ketones √ √
7. Chirality √ √ 18. Carboxylic acids √ √
8. Nucleophilic subst. (√) √ 19. CA deriv.; Nu acyl subst. √ √
9. Alkynes √ √ 20. Enols, enolates √
10. Conjugation; allylic syst. √ √ 21. Amines √ √
11. Arenes, aromaticity √ √ 22. Phenols √ √
POGIL worksheets are used in some chapters. Ch. 3 is mostly a 3-hr. POGIL lab.
Cognitive Psychology and the Spiral Approach
What we’ve learned from cognitive
psychology about techniques for
successful learning.
p.47. Spaced Practice. “The increased
effort required to retrieve the learning
after a little forgetting has the effect
of retriggering consolidation.”
p. 49. Interleaved Practice (of two or
more subjects). “… research shows
unequivocally that mastery and long-
term retention are much better if you
interleave practice ...”
Cognitive Psychology and the Spiral Approach
p. 78. Easier Isn’t Better. “… the easier knowledge
or a skill is for you to retrieve, the less your retrieval
practice will benefit your retention of it. Conversely,
the more effort you have to expend to retrieve
knowledge or skill, the more the practice of retrieval
will entrench it.”
p. 81. “In other words, the more you’ve forgotten about a topic, the
more effective relearning will be in shaping your permanent
knowledge.” “This works to “bolster the cues and retrieval routes
for recalling it later, and weaken competing routes.”
p.87. Unsuccessful attempts to solve a problem encourage deep
processing of the answer when it is later supplied, creating fertile
ground for its encoding …”
Scores on ACS Final Exam - 2nd Semester
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
'05 '06 '07 '08 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '18
# Correct on
2002 ACS Org Chem
(70 Q.)
Year
2-tailed student’s t-test: only 3% probability 2 populations are the same.
Standard sequence
Spiral sequence
Survey of Student Perceptions
• 2010: Survey sent to all previous students
from the 3 years a spiral sequence used.
–Of 31 one-semester students, 17 (55%)
responded
–Of 49 two-semester students, 30 (61%)
responded
• “I think it was good to have the first semester of the
course be a general survey of organic chemistry that
covers the fundamental topics relevant to biology.”
1-semester students
2-semester students
Strongly Disagree 1 6% 0
Disagree 0 0
Neither agree nor disagree
0 2 7%
Agree 6 35% 15 50%
Strongly Agree 10 59% 13 43%
• “I found it confusing to be skipping some chapters or
sections in the textbook.”
1-semester students
2-semester students
Strongly Disagree 3 18% 7 23%
Disagree 11 65% 18 60%
Neither agree nor disagree
2 12% 3 10%
Agree 1 6% 2 7%
Strongly Agree 0 0
• “I think it would be better to follow the standard
sequence, going through the first half of the text in
the first semester and the second half of the text in the
second semester..”
1-semester students
2-semester students
Strongly Disagree 3 18% 8 27%
Disagree 11 65% 15 50%
Neither agree nor disagree
2 12% 7 23%
Agree 1 6% 0
Strongly Agree 0 0
• “For the content we covered in the first semester, I
think I would have learned better with a smaller
textbook designed for a 1-semester introduction to
organic chemistry course, instead of the larger 2-
semester text that we used parts of.”
1-semester students
Strongly Disagree 1 6%
Disagree 7 41%
Neither agree nor disagree
6 35%
Agree 3 18%
Strongly Agree 0
• “Instead of the large 2-semester text that we used for both
semesters, I think I would have learned better with a smaller
textbook designed for a 1-semester introduction to organic
chemistry course in the first semester, and then only using the
larger 2-semester text for the second semester.”
2-semester students
Strongly Disagree 5 17%
Disagree 11 37%
Neither agree nor disagree
7 23%
Agree 7 23%
Strongly Agree 0
• “Seeing some material twice during the year (at an
introductory level in the first semester and in more
depth during the second semester) helped me learn
the material better by the end of the course.”
2-semester students
Strongly Disagree 0 0%
Disagree 1 3%
Neither agree nor disagree
1 3%
Agree 12 40%
Strongly Agree 16 53%
Other Observations
• Students often do better in the 2nd semester, even
though the material is more difficult.
• But those with too many deficiencies from the 1st
semester crash and burn in the 2nd semester.
Other Observations
• Students often do better in the 2nd semester, even
though the material is more difficult.
• But those with too many deficiencies from the 1st
semester crash and burn in the 2nd semester.
Fall grade Spring: ave. change % # ↑ # ↓A -0.5 23 36
A- 0.5 11 8
B+ 1.3 10 6
B -1.7 9 11
B- -0.8 3 3
C+ -3.5 3 5
C -7.6 1 3
C- -39.4 0 2
D/D+ -19.8 0 2
Other Observations
• Students often do better in the 2nd semester, even
though the material is more difficult.
• But those with too many deficiencies from the 1st
semester crash and burn in the 2nd semester.
)
)Now blocked from 2nd
sem.
)
)
Half went up 1-2 grade steps.
Fall grade Spring: ave. change % # ↑ # ↓A -0.5 23 36
A- 0.5 11 8
B+ 1.3 10 6
B -1.7 9 11
B- -0.8 3 3
C+ -3.5 3 5
C -7.6 1 3
C- -39.4 0 2
D/D+ -19.8 0 2
Other Observations
• Problem: 1st semester: Need for additional
homework problems.
• Benefit: chapters finished quicker, meaning
homework due more frequently.
• Assistance for reviewing content on 2nd visit to
a chapter:
–Reaction cards required in 1st semester.
–Moodle quizzes the night before a POGIL
packet.
Other Helpful Tools
• Weekly 10-min. quizzes (17-20% of grade).
• Incentive to be in study groups (3 hrs/wk).
• Discovery labs that anticipate class content
(e.g. carbocation rearrangements)
• 3 practice exams before each exam.
• Exam wrappers.
Summary
• Spiral approach
– A much better experience for 1-semester students
– Supported by cognitive psychology for 2-semester
students.
– 2-semester students show increased learning and
prefer the spiral approach.
– The most significant problems (lack of specific
text, skipping sections, and transfer students) are
not deal-breakers.
• For more info: [email protected]
Questions??
Recognition
• Dan Berger, Bluffton University
• Michael Garoutte, Missouri Southern State
University
• Goshen College Faculty Development Funds