“a semantic map of russian aspect ” laura a. janda unc chapel hill [email protected]
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 2: “A semantic map of Russian aspect ” Laura A. Janda UNC Chapel Hill janda@unc.edu](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022080915/56649dbd5503460f94aaf964/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Overview
• Theoretical issue: Implications of – Conceptual space (Croft 2001, 2003)– Semantic maps (Haspelmath 1997a&b, 2003)
• Practical issue: aspectual pairs vs. verb clusters – There are several types of perfective, both
semantically and morphologically– The structure of verb clusters is highly
constrained
![Page 3: “A semantic map of Russian aspect ” Laura A. Janda UNC Chapel Hill janda@unc.edu](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022080915/56649dbd5503460f94aaf964/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Defining Terms
• Activity (= Process + Repetition)
• Completion Act (= Accomplishment + Achievement)– Natural Perfective – Specialized Perfective
• Complex Act (= Aktionsart: Delimitative, Perdurative, Ingressive, Terminative, etc.)
• Single Act (= Semelfactive)
![Page 4: “A semantic map of Russian aspect ” Laura A. Janda UNC Chapel Hill janda@unc.edu](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022080915/56649dbd5503460f94aaf964/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Aspect and the potential for a dynamic semantic map
• Most semantic maps are synchronically static, though they may reflect historical development
• Russian aspect, however, rather than giving just a menu of alternatives, combines grams in a dynamic fashion, and produces verb clusters
![Page 5: “A semantic map of Russian aspect ” Laura A. Janda UNC Chapel Hill janda@unc.edu](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022080915/56649dbd5503460f94aaf964/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
The Conceptual Space of Aspect
• Three semantic dimensions:– closed vs. open (Smith 1991; Isačenko 1960;
Avilova 1976, Jakobson 1957/1971, Padučeva 1996; Talmy 2000; Forsyth 1970; Bondarko 1971; Comrie 1976; Dickey 2000; Maslov 1965; Bondarko 1971; Timberlake 1982; van Schooneveld 1978 )
– completable vs. non-completable (Smith (1991; Mehlig 2003; Croft in preparation)
– durative vs. instantaneous (Smith 1991; Čertkova 1996; Bondarko 1971; Padučeva (1996)
![Page 6: “A semantic map of Russian aspect ” Laura A. Janda UNC Chapel Hill janda@unc.edu](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022080915/56649dbd5503460f94aaf964/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
The Conceptual Space of Aspect
open
closed closed
closed closed
completable
non-completable
durative instantaneous
![Page 7: “A semantic map of Russian aspect ” Laura A. Janda UNC Chapel Hill janda@unc.edu](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022080915/56649dbd5503460f94aaf964/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Russian Grams and the Conceptual Space of Aspect
Imperf suffixessimplexes
prefixes ну suffix
Completion Acts
Activities
Complex ActsSingle Acts
![Page 8: “A semantic map of Russian aspect ” Laura A. Janda UNC Chapel Hill janda@unc.edu](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022080915/56649dbd5503460f94aaf964/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Proposed Semantic Map of Russian Aspect
Activity
Specialized Perfective
NaturalPerfective
Complex Act Single Act
![Page 9: “A semantic map of Russian aspect ” Laura A. Janda UNC Chapel Hill janda@unc.edu](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022080915/56649dbd5503460f94aaf964/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
But are all verbs like щипатьi ‘pinch, plucki’ ?
• Do all verb clusters have the same pathway structure or are there variations?
• If there are variations, are there patterns?
• Are there pathways that do not exist?• What are the overall implications and
constraints of the system?
![Page 10: “A semantic map of Russian aspect ” Laura A. Janda UNC Chapel Hill janda@unc.edu](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022080915/56649dbd5503460f94aaf964/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Data: A survey of 283 verb clusters
• Culled from the simplexes in Townsend’s (1975) verb inventory
• Simplex Imperfective = Activity; Natural Perfective identified by Ožegov
• Simplex Perfective = Natural Perfective• Specialized Perfective(s) identified by
Zaliznjak• Complex Act verified on internet• Single Act identified in Obratnyj slovar’
![Page 11: “A semantic map of Russian aspect ” Laura A. Janda UNC Chapel Hill janda@unc.edu](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022080915/56649dbd5503460f94aaf964/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
The Three Dominant Cluster Types
• Represent most verbs in Russian (each accounts for under 20%, collectively account for 56%)
• Contain three or four elements = Activity + Specialized Perfective + Natural Perfective and/or Complex Act
• Exclude Single Acts
![Page 12: “A semantic map of Russian aspect ” Laura A. Janda UNC Chapel Hill janda@unc.edu](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022080915/56649dbd5503460f94aaf964/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Uncommon but well-attested cluster types
• Each accounts for under 10%, collectively account for 35%
• All attested cluster types that contain a Single Act verb appear in this grouping
• All cluster types that contain a Single Act verb also contain a Complex Act verb
• Activity + Natural Perfective is in low end of this group
![Page 13: “A semantic map of Russian aspect ” Laura A. Janda UNC Chapel Hill janda@unc.edu](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022080915/56649dbd5503460f94aaf964/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Rare cluster types
• Each accounts for <1%-2%, collectively account for less than 8%
• With one exception, all types in this group conform to patterns established by larger groups
• One cluster type not attested in survey violates restraint requiring Activity to precede Natural or Specialized Perfective
![Page 14: “A semantic map of Russian aspect ” Laura A. Janda UNC Chapel Hill janda@unc.edu](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022080915/56649dbd5503460f94aaf964/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Some Generalizations
• Most possible cluster types are not attested • A quarter of the possible types account for over
90% of verbs in survey• All attested cluster types contain an Activity• Over half of verbs have a cluster type consisting
of Activity + Specialized Perfective, with Natural Perfective and/or Complex Act
• Single Act verb in a cluster requires the presence of Complex Act
• Clusters that contain a Perfective simplex do not contain a Single Act verb
![Page 15: “A semantic map of Russian aspect ” Laura A. Janda UNC Chapel Hill janda@unc.edu](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022080915/56649dbd5503460f94aaf964/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Implicational Hierarchy
• Implicational hierarchy (completable or non-completable):
Activity > (Specialized Perfective/Natural Perfective) > Complex Act > Single Act
![Page 16: “A semantic map of Russian aspect ” Laura A. Janda UNC Chapel Hill janda@unc.edu](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022080915/56649dbd5503460f94aaf964/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Comparison with aspectual pair model
• Cluster types consisting of only two elements are uncommon
• Activity + Natural Perfective should be predominant cluster type, but less than 10% of verbs have this cluster type, and they are semantically unusual
• Aspectual pair model denies existence of larger clusters in which “pairs” are almost always embedded
• Aspectual pair model fails to capture significant patterns and implicational hierarchies