a scintillation detector for neutrons below 1 mev with gamma-ray rejection scintillators are 3 mm...
TRANSCRIPT
A scintillation detector for neutrons below 1 MeV with gamma-ray rejection
Scintillators are 3 mm BC408, 10 layers totalAdjacent layers are optically isolatedActive scint. area approx. 10 cm x 10 cm in this prototypeEach PMT discriminator triggered near top of 1 photoelectron distributionL-R and T-B thresholds approx. 10 keVee; Coincidence requirement removes noise
The light response of BC-418 plastic scintillator to protons with energies from 60 keV to 5 MeV
Motivation
• primary interest in n+p=>d+γ for Big-Bang Nucleosynthesis models
• Important neutron kinetic energies: 50 – 500 keV=> produced deuteron kinetic energy 25 – 250 keV
• we used fast plastic scintillator BC-418 as active target (AT)
• AT in coincidence with NE-213 liquid scintillator used to test limits of the detector and observe low energy proton recoils from n-elastic scattering in BC-418
Motivation
• data on relative light response of plastic scintillators to heavy charged particles scarce and/or non-existent below 350 keV
=> Determination of neutron detector efficiency depends on the threshold, big systematic errors for detection of low energy neutrons
=> Cross calibration with γ-sources difficult
• general applications: - (not so) fast neutron, proton detection - nuclear safeguards (search for 3He substitute(s)) - modeling of detector response - etc…
light response• The only information from Bicron (aka Saint-Gobain) is for BC-400, or semi-generic for high energy only. => what about BC-418 ?
htt
p:/
/ww
w.d
ete
cto
rs.s
ain
t-g
ob
ain
.co
m
Smith et al., NIM64(1968)
300 keV
Same as BC-400
• light response data scarce and/or nonexistent for Eproton< 300 keV
Experiments at WNR
• proton beam (Ep=800 MeV) impinges on bare tungsten spallation target
• 4FP15R – neutron beam line 15° on the right of the proton beam axis – neutron energies ~450 keV – 800 MeV (with 1.8 μs beam pulses) – neutron energies ~120 keV – 800 MeV (with 3.6 μs beam pulses)
Experimental setup
• neutron beam impinges on the active target (BC-418; 2mm thick)
• energy of beam particles is determined from their time-of-flight • when neutron is elastically scattered in the active target (AT) the recoil proton (Ep = f Ebeam) is detected in AT in coincidence with elastically scattered neutron detected in neutron detector (NE-213 2x2 inch cylinder) (En= (1-f) Ebeam )
• f is function of scattering angle (=0.11 for Θ=20°; =0.5 for Θ=45°; )• analog signal from AT integrated by LeCroy 4300B FERA QDC
• most of the beam neutrons with energies ~ 1-5 MeV
• time-of-flight to AT for 1 MeV neutron is ~ 1.2 us
• time resolution ~ 2ns => high energy-resolution
• events of neutron elastic scattering in AT selected from 2D-plot of ToF(AT=>ND) vs. Ebeam
=> defined by complete kinematics
Ebeam [MeV]
Ebeam [MeV]
To
F(A
T=
>N
D) [
ns
]c
ou
nts
elastic scattering
Experimental results
Ep-recoil [MeV] Ep-recoil [MeV]
co
un
ts
co
un
ts
lig
ht
res
po
ns
[A
.U.]
lig
ht
res
po
ns
[A
.U.]
high gain low gain
Ep-recoil = 100 ±10 keV Ep-recoil = 250 ±25 keV
light respons [A.U.]light respons [A.U.]
241Am (59.54 keV)
133Ba (~31 keV)
Smith et al. (68)
Experimental results
• measurement of the BC-418 light response to both protons and electrons reaches new low energy limits for plastic scintillators
Experimental results
• BC-418 light response data seem to confirm that light response to protons increases with respect to light response to electrons below ~ 300-500 keV
p/β ratios:
November 4, 2010DNP Fall Meeting, 2010
Brian DaubMassachusetts Institute of Technology
13 Of 16
Measurement of Neutron-Proton Total Scattering Cross Section by
Neutron Transmission
Brian Daub, Vladimir HenzlMassachusetts Institute of Technology
Michael Kovash, Khayrullo ShoniyozovUniversity of Kentucky
November 4, 2010DNP Fall Meeting, 2010
Brian DaubMassachusetts Institute of Technology
14 Of 16
Motivation
There are numerous fields which would benefit from precise n-p total cross section data.
Two Body Nucleon Interactions Nuclear Reactors Detector Efficiencies Particle Astrophysics
November 4, 2010DNP Fall Meeting, 2010
Brian DaubMassachusetts Institute of Technology
15 Of 16
MotivationHowever, there are few measurements of the n-p total
cross section below 500 keV.
November 4, 2010DNP Fall Meeting, 2010
Brian DaubMassachusetts Institute of Technology
16 Of 16
Transmission Measurement
Data taken using the Van de Graaff Accelerator at the University of Kentucky.
Neutrons produced by pulsed protons on a LiF target, through the 7Li(p,n)7Be reaction.
Detector is placed directly in the beam.
Sample is placed in the beam-line upstream of the detector.
Neutrons are scattered out of the beam by the sample.
Determine total cross section from number of neutrons scattered out.
November 4, 2010DNP Fall Meeting, 2010
Brian DaubMassachusetts Institute of Technology
17 Of 16
Transmission Measurement
Setup for Transmission Measurement
287 cm from LiF to Neutron Detector
85 cm from LiF to Sample
November 4, 2010DNP Fall Meeting, 2010
Brian DaubMassachusetts Institute of Technology
18 Of 16
Transmission Measurement
2.25 MeV protons pulsed at 1.8 MHz to produce neutrons up to 450 keV. Minimum energy was 200 keV.
Neutron detector was 5-inch diameter BC501 liquid scintillator.
287 cm flight path from LiF target to neutron detector.
November 4, 2010DNP Fall Meeting, 2010
Brian DaubMassachusetts Institute of Technology
19 Of 16
Transmission Measurement
Four Samples
1/2 Inch Carbon
1/2 Inch CH2
1/4 Inch CH2
Wax Blocker Ratios of normalized
target-in to target-out yields give cross section independent of dead time and efficiency.
November 4, 2010DNP Fall Meeting, 2010
Brian DaubMassachusetts Institute of Technology
20 Of 16
Transmission Measurement
γ-flash from LiF target
neutrons producedfrom LiF target
Neutron time of flight spectra, showing deficit of neutrons.
November 4, 2010DNP Fall Meeting, 2010
Brian DaubMassachusetts Institute of Technology
21 Of 16
Transmission MeasurementCorrelated band in neutron energy (from time of flight) vs. neutron
detector pulse height, used to exclude non-neutron background.
November 4, 2010DNP Fall Meeting, 2010
Brian DaubMassachusetts Institute of Technology
22 Of 16
First Results - Carbon Total n-C scattering cross sections with Endf Tabulation.
Data matches Endf within ~2%.
November 4, 2010DNP Fall Meeting, 2010
Brian DaubMassachusetts Institute of Technology
23 Of 16
First Results - Carbon Our results are consistent with previous measurements.
November 4, 2010DNP Fall Meeting, 2010
Brian DaubMassachusetts Institute of Technology
24 Of 16
First Results - Hydrogen Total n-p scattering cross sections with Endf tabulation and
other data in range. Most results ~10-15% difference with Endf.
November 4, 2010DNP Fall Meeting, 2010
Brian DaubMassachusetts Institute of Technology
25 Of 16
Results Tabulations match with higher and lower energy range, but
deviates in region with our results.
November 4, 2010DNP Fall Meeting, 2010
Brian DaubMassachusetts Institute of Technology
26 Of 16
Future Measurements
γ-ray background-rejecting detector
Discriminates between neutrons and γ-rays Tested at LANSCE in August 2010
Extending results to
Lower Energies: Lower repetition rate beam at UKY allows for longer times of flight; tested in March 2010.
Higher Energies: Increased proton energy yields higher incident neutron energies.
Planned run in January 2011 at UKY with these additions.
November 4, 2010DNP Fall Meeting, 2010
Brian DaubMassachusetts Institute of Technology
27 Of 16
Cross Section Calculation
Intensity as a function of Thickness Yield is Intensity times efficiency timeslivetime.
Yield as a function of thickness. Efficiency cancels in ratio.
November 4, 2010DNP Fall Meeting, 2010
Brian DaubMassachusetts Institute of Technology
28 Of 16
Cross Section Calculation
Intensity proportional to beam current. T x J = Q, livetime integrated current.
Cross Section is now independent of efficiency and deadtime.