a research of the difference between the design of mmrtg...

15
1 A Research of The Difference between the Design of MMRTG and common TEG Jue Bo Feixiang Sun ME 6950 Professor: Dr. HoSung Lee

Upload: others

Post on 27-Jan-2021

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 1

    A Research of The Difference between the Design of

    MMRTG and common TEG

    Jue Bo

    Feixiang Sun

    ME 6950

    Professor: Dr. HoSung Lee

  • 2

    Abstract

    A radioisotope thermoelectric generator is an electrical generator that makes use of

    series of thermocouples to convert the heat released by the decay of some radioactive

    material into electricity. RTGs have already been used in space probes and some remote

    facilities. Since they have no moving parts that will lose effectiveness or wear out, RTGs

    have historically been considered as a highly reliable power option especially for space

    application. This work is based on summary current researches, analysis the impact factors

    of power output efficiency. As a result, due to the condition of usage and environment, an

    optimal design is secondary under the most circumstances. The design must submit to the

    load of the RTG.

    Keywords: thermoelectric, generator, radioisotope, RTG, Radioisotope thermoelectric

    generator, impact factor, optimal design

  • 3

    Content

    Content ....................................................................................................................... 3

    Introduction ................................................................................................................. 4

    Basic Model ................................................................................................................ 6

    Assumption ................................................................................................................. 8

    Procedure .................................................................................................................... 9

    Conclusion ................................................................................................................ 13

    Referance .................................................................................................................. 15

  • 4

    Introduction

    RTG is a thermoelectric generator with radioisotope as heat source. Plutonium-238 is

    used most widely as power source in lots kinds of devices. Such as Pacemaker, Artificial

    aircraft and Lighthouse Beacons. What’s more, Pu-238 has some big advantages like long

    life for power output with low reduction, low requirement of protection of radio and it has

    most decay energy per unit mass among all known isotope. Compared with the traditional

    thermoelectric generator, RTG has always been considered as a higher reliable selection.

    Because it has no moving parts that can be changed. RTGs have been used in many different

    ways and they are always been used in variable situations for lots of different missions. So

    what we usually see in series devices is MMRTG which is Multi-mission Radioisotope

    Thermoelectric Generator. What’s more, in this paper we will also talk about some methods

    to improve the MMRTG.

  • 5

    Fig.1. Power output of Pu-238

    PowerPerKg 540W

    kg

    Power mass lifetime( ) PowerPerKg mass1

    2

    lifetime

    halflife

  • 6

    Basic Model

    Fig. 2. Cut-away view of the MMRTG

    Fig. 3. Schematic Diagram of an RTG System

  • 7

    In this simple RTG model provided for the pacemaker (Fig.3), Plutonium-238 as the

    isotope heat source provide heat of decay for the hot junction. And of course, there is some

    heat lost due to insulation, cracks and support structure. Then from the thermoelectric

    generator module, this device output the electrical power finally. Also as we can see the

    Cut-away view of the MMRTG in Fig.2, there are several modules with the heat source

    which can be considered as the core of the device with the aluminum cover outside.

    Furthermore, some additional components help the whole MMRTG device more reliable

    as well. Now, we are facing some difficult situations like the scarcity of the Pu-238 fuel

    and high associated cost. So increasing the efficiency of RTGs became a very serious issue.

    For the same power to be generated from generators, this could allow less usage of the Pu-

    238 fuel and present a lower payload weight to the launch vehicle.

    MMRTG with Pu-238 used in satellite

  • 8

    Assumption

    The TE (Thermoelectric) couples of the MMRTGs usually have one PbTe n-leg and

    one segmented PbSnTe/TAGS-85 p-leg (see fig.4). Then we can make an assumption as:

    While with the TE efficiency being related to the figure of merit (ZT), selecting some new

    kinds of materials with those having higher figure of merit will be a good choice. What’s

    more, giving a better chemical stability at higher temperatures can increase the efficiency

    as well. We can call the new design of MMRTG eMMRTG which is enhanced Multi-

    mission Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator.

    Fig.4. MMRTG and eMMRTG couples

  • 9

    Procedure

    Assume both MMRTG and eMMRTG are designed with maximum power output,

    therefore the figure of merit Z can be reverse calculate by the maximum power

    efficiency ηmp equation (Eq.1). [1]

    ZTc, Figure of Merit at cold junction temperature

    Tc, The temperature of cold junction temperature.

    Th, The temperature of hot junction temperature.

    By the design parameters of the MMRTG and eMMRTG system(Table I), when the

    at cold junction temperature is 150°C while hot junction temperature is 525°C, the

    figure of merit of MMRTG ZTc is 0.35 and the figure of merit of eMMRTG ZTc is 0.385-

    0.434. Therefore, at the hot junction the figure of merit of MMRTG and eMMRTG are

    0.778@525°C and 0.794-0.895@600°C, respectively, which is a great agreement with

    the data in Fig.5.

    mp

    1Tc

    Th

    21

    21

    Tc

    Th

    4

    Tc

    Th

    ZTc

  • 10

    Table I. the design parameter of the MMRTG and eMMRTG systems [2]

    Design parameters MMRTG Enhanced MMRTG

    Design-point QHS 1984 WTH TBD

    TE hot-side temp 525°C 600 °C

    TE cold-side temp 100-200°C 100-200°C

    Initial Power ~120W ~145-170W

    Initial system efficiency 6.0% 7.6-8.3%

    Calculation

    by Eq1

    ZTc 0.35@150°C 0.385-0.434@150°C

    ZTh 0.778@525°C 0.794-0.895@600°C

  • 11

    Obviously, a higher hot-junction-temperature will provide a higher efficiency, but

    it need an emissive coating implemented on the heat source isolation liner when

    above 550°C to protect overheat damage and retard the aging of TE module. [2]

    However the figure of merit Z can only be treated as constant in a small

    temperature range, it is various in a large range, which makes it not a straight line but

    a curve. At the same time, the ZT of many kinds of TE martial does not increase or

    even decrease above some certain temperature as Fig.5. [3]

    Fig.5. Thermoelectric figure-of-merit, ZT, of the materials used in the MMRTG and

    proposed for the eMMRTG systems.

  • 12

    Note that the several increase output power point of Curiosity’s MMRTG (Fig.7),

    in these time point, the environmental conditions on the Mars raise the temperature

    of the fin root of the generator, which in turn raised the hot-junction-temperature

    back into the designed temperature range. This phenomenon mention us that the

    environment condition of the destination is also an important factor that must be

    consider during the design process. As well as a large difference of temperature does

    not mean a very low cold-junction-temperature. [4]

    Fig 6

    560 580 600 620 640

    80

    100

    120

    140

    eMMRTG_Power Thi

    Thi /°C

    500 510 520 530 540 55080

    100

    120

    140

    160

    180

    MMRTG_Power Thi

    Thi /°C

  • 13

    Conclusion

    From what have been shown above, the assumption can be proved. While select the

    new materials with those having higher figure of merit, the TE efficiency increased. What’s

    more, from fig.5 we can directly see that giving a higher temperatures can increase the

    figure of merit which could increase the TE efficiency as well.

    A design of MMRTG includes many impact factors. By considering maximum power

    output efficiency equation alone, lower cold side temperature, higher hot side temperature

    and better thermoelectric material are the only three factors that impact the efficiency

    Fig.7. Output power of Curiosity’s MMRTG during flight and on the surface of Mars

    during its first Martian year. [5]

  • 14

    directly. However, due to the limitation of material property, a too high temperature will

    bring a negative drop for certain material as well as increase the risk of overheat damage

    of the load. Considering the space application is the most widely usage of MMRTG where

    the equipment on it always needs good protection and has huge difficulty or even hardly to

    repair, a simple high hot-side temperature or low cold-side temperature is only a better

    design for the generator but not the entire system. The better way to increase the efficiency

    of RTG system is using better and more reliable thermoelectric material.

  • 15

    Referance

    [1] H. Lee, "Thermoelectric Generator," in Thermal Design: Heat Sinks,

    Thermoelectrics, Heat Pipes, Compact Heat Exchangers, and Solar Cells, New

    Jersey, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. .

    [2] R. B. T. H. TIM C. HOLGATE, "Increasing the Efficiency of the Multi-

    mission Radioisotope," The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society, vol. 44, pp.

    1814-1821, 2015.

    [3] X. W. Wang, H. Lee, Y. C. Lan, G. H. Zhu, G. Joshi, D. Z. Wang, J. Yang,

    A. J. Muto, M. Y. Tang and J. Klatsky, "Enhanced thermoelectric figure of merit

    in nanostructured n-type silicon germanium," Applied Physics Letters, 2008.

    [4] B. Poudel, H. Qing, M. Yi, L. Yucheng, M. Austin , Y. Bo, Y. Xiao, W. Dezhi,

    M. Andrew, V. Daryoosh, C. Xiaoyuan, L. Junming, D. S. Mildred, C. Gang and

    R. Zhifeng, "High-Thermoelectric Performance of Nanostructured Bismuth

    Antimony Tellurid Bulk Alloys," Science, pp. 634-638, May 2008.

    [5] NASA, Curiosity, 2011-2015.