a project funded by african bird club (abc)
TRANSCRIPT
ASSESSING THE CONSERVATION STATUS OF AVIFAUNA AND THE FOREST HABITAT OF NORTH
NANDI IMPORTANT BIRD AREA, KENYA
AUTHORS: Simon Musila, Alex Syingi, Nickson Sajita
A Project Funded by African Bird Club (ABC)
2
FINAL REPORT: ASSESSING THE CONSERVATION STATUS OF AVIFAUNA AND THE FOREST HABITAT AT NORTH NANDI IMPORTANT BIRD AREA, KENYA Simon Musila1, Alex Syingi2, Nickson Sajita3
1 National Museums of Kenya, Mammalogy Section, P. O Box 40658, GPO 00100 Nairobi-Kenya. Tel. +254-020-3742131/61-64 ext 242/3. Fax. 3741424, 3741049. Email: [email protected], [email protected]
2 National Museums of Kenya, Ornithology Section, P. O Box 40658, GPO 00100 Nairobi-Kenya. Tel. +254-020-3742131/61-64 ext 242/3. Fax. 3741424, 3741049.
3 Kakamega Environmental Education Program (KEEP), Naturalist and guide-Kakamega Forest Important Bird Area, Kenya. SUMMARY: North Nandi Forest Important Bird Area is one of the most sites for the conservation of globally-threatened Chapin’s Flycatcher Muscicapa lendu in Kenya. In between July and October 2009, avian surveys were conducted in the eastern part of this forest to assess the conservation status of Chapin’s Flycatcher and other avifauna. Five different transects about 500M from each other and 3-3.5Km in Length were used. A total of 108 bird species were recorded which were 68% of 160 recorded in 1999. Out of 108 species, 33 were forest specialist (FF), 37 generalist (F) and 37 visitors (f). 21 Afro-Tropical Highland Biome species recorded in the survey represented 62 % (21/34) of 34 in the past, while 21 Guineo-congolian Forest Biome forest bird species recorded represented 88% (21/24) of the 24 recorded in this forest in 1999. The globally threatened Chapin’s Flycatcher was not recorded in this study. Five individuals of globally-threatened Turner’s Eremomela Eremomela turneri were recorded in Ngatatia-Kapkuto transect foraging on top of Croton megalocarpus tree. Threats to forest included cattle grazing, firewood collection and extraction of building/fencing poles and timber. No evidence of recent large-scale commercial logging and charcoal burning was recorded in the eastern part. The high species riches of FF, biome-restricted species in the small area (157ha) surveyed in the current study probably indicates that North Nandi Forest has faced minimal habitat degradation for the last 10 years (1999-2009). We therefore, recommend additional research on biodiversity of this forest, improved patrols by Kenya Forest Service (KFS) guards to reduce illegal forest exploitation and engagement of the surrounding local community to undertake activities which sustainably improve livelihoods and forest conservation. INTRODUCTION: North Nandi Forest Important Bird Area (IBA) is a strip of high-
canopy Forest Reserve on the edge of the Nandi escarpment, Rift Valley, Kenya.
Biogeographically, the forest is transitional between the lowland forest of west and
central Africa and montane forests of the central Kenya highlands (Bennun and Njoroge,
1999). The forest belongs to the Kakamega and Nandi forests Secondary Area of
endemism, defined by the presence of the globally threatened and restricted-range
3
Chapin’s Flycatcher Muscicapa lendu (Stattersfield et al. 1998; Bird Life International,
2000). Avifauna is similar to that of the adjacent Kakamega Forest mostly comprising of
Guinea-Congo forests (24 out of 43 Kenyan species) and Afro-tropical Highland biomes
(34 out of 67 species) species; and abound 160 species have been recorded in the past
(Bennun and Njoroge, 1999; Zimmerman et al. 1996). It is one of the important sites in
Kenya for globally threatened Chapin’s Flycatcher (vulnerable). Species of regional
concern includes African Green Ibis Bostrychia olivacea, African Crown Eagle
Stephanoaetus coronatus, Red-chested Owlet Glaucidium perlatum, Thick-billed
Honeyguide Indicator conirostris, Least Honeyguide Indicator exilis, Grey-chested
Illadopsis Kakamega poliothorax, Yellow-bellied Wattle-eye Dyaphorophyia concreta
(all vulnerable) and Southern Hyliota Hyliota australis (Zimmerman et al. 1996). The
main threats to the forest habitat include illegal timber extraction, charcoal burning, forest
grazing and unsustainable removal of forest products (Ng’weno et al., 2004; Musila, et
al., 2005; Bennun and Njoroge, 1999). Such activities are likely to reduce significantly or
locally exterminate populations of avian species highly sensitive to habitat disturbance.
Overall Aim
The main goal of this study was to assess avifaunal richness and abundance, conservation
status of Chapin’s Flycatcher and threats to forest habitats of North Nandi Forest IBA.
Specific Objectives were;
1. Determine the current status of globally threatened and restricted-range Chapin’s
Flycatcher.
2. Investigate the bird species richness and abundance.
3. Investigate the current threats to the avifauna and forest habitats.
4. Recommend the appropriate conservation strategy to conserve birds and their habitats.
4
METHOD AND MATERIALS
Study area. This project was conducted in North Nandi Forest which occurs in between
00°00’ S 35° 00’E in Rift Valley Province of Kenya at an altitude of 1700-2130m (Fig 1).
This area receives about 1500mm of rainfall annually, and has soils which are well
drained. The forest is an Important Bird Areas and legally protected as a Forest Reserve
in Kenya under the management of Kenya Forest Service (KFS). This study was
conducted in the eastern part of the forest in between July and October 2009, during the
wet season in Kapchepkok area of North Nandi Forest. In 1999, the gazetted forest area
covered 10,500ha which included 8000ha of indigenous close-canopy forest and 2,500 ha
of cultivation, grasslands, plantation and tea fertile (Bennun and Njoroge, 1999).
Figure 1: Map of Kenya and the study area from Bennun and Njoroge (1999)
5
Bird Surveys: Birds were surveyed using transects, which were routes used by the locals
grazing in the forest, collecting firewood or accessing the western part of the forest. Five
transects (Kamokuywo-Chesombe-3.5Km; Ngatatia-Kipsamoite-3.0Km; Kamokuywo-
Epeso Hill-3.0Km; Ngatatia-Kapkuto-3.0Km & Singoro-Irewa-3.2Km) were established
on the eastern side of North Nandi Forest on the side of Kapsisiywa (Fig 1), identified in
four villages (Kamokuywo, Chesombe, Ngatatia and Singoro) in Kapchepkok Sub-
location. The transects were about 500M from each other and 3-3.5Km in Length into
the forest. The start of each route was marked using GPS. Three observers surveyed birds
from dawn (6:30am) and ended at 10:00am, when bird activities declined. All bird seen
or heard calling within 50 M from observes from both sides of the transect were recorded
including the species, number and type of contact (Bibby, et al.,1998; and Bibby. et al.,
1992). To compile a comprehensive checklist of birds from the forest we recorded any
new spices encountered in the forest after the end of transect surveys and beyond 50M
from observers. Human activities such as cattle grazing, logging and firewood collection
were noted along each transect and some locals were interviewed about utilization of
forest products and their participation in the conservation of North Nandi Forest.
Data analysis: Data for the two surveys (July and October) for the five transects was
combined and analyzed because it covered the same section of the North Nandi Forest. A
checklist of birds was prepared reflecting avifaunal composition of the IBA. Bird species
were categorized into their dependence (forest specialist, generalist and visitors) on the
forest following classifications provided by Bennun et al., (1996). Densities of Forest
Specialists (FF) and Forest Generalists (F) were calculated by dividing the total number
of individuals of each species recorded by the total area of the five transects. The total
area surveyed was 157ha (transect width (50M one side *2=100M)* total length of five
transects 15.7KM (15700M) =1,570,000M2/10,000 M2 (1ha-10,000M2). Out of 10,500ha
of North Nandi Forest in 1999 we estimated visually that 6000 ha (25% (2000 ha lost
since 1999) was the remaining undisturbed primary habitat suitable for forest specialists
birds. We also estimated that 8000ha of existing forest in 2009 was suitable for forest
generalist birds. The population size of forest specialist and generalist birds was
estimated by multiplying the calculated density of each species with the remaining
primary (6000ha) and secondary (8000ha) habitats.
6
RESULTS
Species richness: A total of 108 bird species were recorded in the five transects inside
North Nandi Forest in July and October 2009 surveys (Appendix 1). A total of 68 species
were recorded in Ngatatia-Kipsamoite transect, 57 in Kamokuywo-Chesombe, 55 in
Ngatatia-Kapkuto, 51 in Kamokuywo-Epeso Hill and 41 in Singoro-Irewa. A total of 33
forest specialist (FF), 37 generalist (F) and 37 visitors (f) birds were recorded in the five
transects (Table 1).
Table 1: Summary of different forest birds recorded in North Nandi Forest.
FOREST BIRD CATEGORY
TOTAL
SPP
PERCENTAGE
(%)
1 Forest Specialist (FF) 33 31
2 Forest Generalist (F) 38 35
3 Forest Visitors (f) 37 34
TOTAL 108 100
Species Abundance: Using bird densities per ha. as indicators of bird abundance in the
forest: Cabanis Greenbul Phyllastrephus cabanisi a forest specialist was the most
abundant followed by Buff-throated Apalis Apalis rufogularis, Stuhlmann's Starling
Poeoptera stuhlmanni, Olive Sunbird Nectarinia olivacea, Dusky Tit Parus funereus and
Brown-chested Alethe Alethe poliocephala (Table 2). Yellow-whiskered Greenbul
Anthropadus latirostris was the most abundant forest generalist, followed by Yellow-
rumped Tinkerbird Pogoniulus bilineatus, Black-collared Apalis Apalis pulchra, Ludher's
Bush-shrike Laniarius luethderi, Grey-throated Barbet Gymnobucco bonapartei,
Cinnamon-chested Bee-eater Merops oreobates and Chubb's Cisticola Cisticola chubby
(Table 3).
7
Table 2: Forest specialist birds-their densities and estimated population size
BIRD SPECIES
NUMBER RECORDED
BIRD DENSITY(bird/ha)
POPULATION ESTIMATE
1 Grey Cuckoo-shrike 1 0.006 382 Mountain Greenbul 1 0.006 383 Red-tailed Ant Thrush 1 0.006 384 Brown Illadopsis 2 0.013 765 Cameroon Sombre Greenbul 2 0.013 766 Fine-banded Woodpecker 2 0.013 767 Grey-headed Negrofinch 2 0.013 768 Hartlaub's Turaco 2 0.013 769 Mountain Illadopsis 2 0.013 76
10 Pink-footed Puff Back 2 0.013 7611 Red-tailed Bristle-bill 2 0.013 7612 Slender-billed Greenbul 2 0.013 7613 Chestnut Wattle-eye 3 0.019 11514 Petit's Cuckoo-shrike 3 0.019 11515 White-tailed Ant Thrush 3 0.019 11516 African Hill Babbler 4 0.025 15317 Shelly's Greenbul 4 0.025 15318 White-headed Wood-hoopoe 4 0.025 15319 Turner's Eremomela 5 0.032 19120 Brown-capped Weaver 7 0.045 26821 Equitorial Akalat 7 0.045 26822 Jameson Wattle-eye 7 0.045 26823 Scaly-breasted Illadopsis 8 0.051 30624 Black-faced Rofous Warbler 10 0.064 38225 Honeyguide Greenbul 10 0.064 38226 Uganda Woodland Warbler 12 0.076 45927 White-tailed Crested Flycatcher 14 0.089 53528 Brown-chested Alethe 17 0.108 65029 Dusky Tit 19 0.121 72630 Olive Sunbird 23 0.146 87931 Stuhlmann's Starling 39 0.248 149032 Buff-throated Apalis 40 0.255 152933 Cabanis Greenbul 110 0.701 4204
8
Table 3: Forest generalist birds-their densities and estimated population size
BIRD SPECIES NUMBER
RECORDED
BIRD DENSITY (bird/ha)
POPULATIONESTIMATE
1 Black-white Casqued Hornbill 1 0.01 512 Brown-eared Woodpecker 1 0.01 513 Great Sparrow hawk 1 0.01 514 Narina Trogon 1 0.01 515 Snowy-headed Robin Chat 1 0.01 516 Yellow-crested Woodpecker 1 0.01 517 African Emerald Cuckoo 2 0.01 1028 African Goshawk 2 0.01 1029 Dusky-crested Flycatcher 2 0.01 102
10 Yellow Throated Leaflove 2 0.01 10211 Yellow-billed Barbet 2 0.01 10212 African Dusky Flycatcher 3 0.02 15313 Black-throated Wattle-eye 3 0.02 15314 African Dusky Flycatcher 3 0.02 15315 African Green Pigeon 4 0.03 20416 Collared Sunbird 4 0.03 20417 Ross's Turaco 4 0.03 20418 White-spotted Flufftail 4 0.03 20419 Green-headed Sunbird 5 0.03 25520 Joyful Greenbul 5 0.03 25521 Red-chested Cuckoo 6 0.04 30622 Western Black-headed Oriole 6 0.04 30623 Southern Hyliota 8 0.05 40824 Dark-backed Weaver 9 0.06 45925 Grey-green Bush-shrike 9 0.06 45926 Blue-shouldered Robin Chat 10 0.06 51027 Red-headed Bluebill 10 0.06 51028 White-eyed Slaty Flycatcher 10 0.06 51029 White-chinned Prinia 13 0.08 66230 Tambourine Dove 16 0.10 81531 Northern-double Collared Sunbird 19 0.12 96832 Chubb's Cisticola 24 0.15 122333 Cinnamon-chested Bee-eater 24 0.15 122334 Grey-throated Barbet 25 0.16 127435 Ludher's Bush-shrike 30 0.19 152936 Black-collared Apalis 52 0.33 265037 Yellow-rumped Tinkerbird 55 0.35 280338 Yellow-whiskered Greenbul 186 1.18 9478
9
Status of globally threatened species and other species of regional concern: The
globally threatened (Vulnerable) Chapin’s Flycatcher was not recorded in this study.
However, five individuals of globally threatened (Vulnerable) Turner’s Eremomela
Eremomela turneri were recorded in Ngatatia-Kapkuto transect foraging on top of Croton
megalocarpus tree. 21 Afro-Tropical Highland Biome species were recorded, which
represented 62 % (21/34) of 34 afro-tropical highland biome species recorded in this
forest in North Nandi Forest in the past (1999). There were 21 Guineo-congolian Forest
Biome bird species recorded in this survey, which represented 88% (21/24) of the 24
biome species recorded in this forest in 1999 (Appendix 1). Southern Hyliota
(endangered) was the only regionally threatened birds in this survey.
Threats to forest habitats: There were four main habitat types which were recorded in
North Nandi Forest. These included a wetland, open grasslands, indigenous forest
habitats and plantations. The wetland inside the forest which extended to the outside of
the forest into Kapchepkok was about 300 ha. The wetland had reeds and other aquatic
vegetation and a permanent stream flowing outside the forest (Fig 2). The indigenous
forest habitat comprising of the primary and the secondary habitat was the largest and
possibly covered about more than 8000 ha (Fig 3), with the primary undisturbed habitat
covering about 6000ha . The plantation forest of exotic trees was probably more than
1500 ha. Small glades and large grassed open areas (like the one in Epeso hill) occurring
inside the forest covered approximately 500ha. It was not possible to establish how much
forest cover had been lost since the last survey in 1994. The start of each transect and
about 50-100M into the forest had been heavily logged in the past about 5 years ago
(2004). The remaining habitat in the edge comprised of an open canopy with a few
scattered tall (20-40M high) indigenous trees and an undergrowth of thick shrubs (c. 5M
high) dominated by pioneer species such as Solanum mauritanium, Neobotonia
macrocalyx among others. More than 200M from the edge into the interior of the forest,
the under-story lacked Solanum mauritanium, Neobotonia macrocalyx plants; had thick
mid and high canopy characterized by tall indigenous trees indicating that this section of
the forest was in good condition to support sensitive birds and other mammals.
10
Evidence of cattle grazing such as grazing animals, hoof prints of domestic cattle were
recorded in all five transects. The forest was the main source of forage for locals keeping
at most five animals in their farms. The locals were allowed grazing rights in the forest
and the activity did not seem regulated by the Kenya Forest Service (KFS) managing the
forest. The forest was the main source of firewood to the locals. Locals used the different
routes to extract firewood from the forest for domestic use. Firewood collection was
regulated by KFS by issuance of firewood permits to women to collect wood once per
day. Illegal subsistence extraction of building logs and fencing poles was recorded in all
transects. The loggers targeted old dead felled trees which were split and moved away for
domestic use or commercial purposes. A section of Ngatatia-Kapkuto transect was
heavily logged between January-February 2007 during the post-election violence in
Kenya, when large trees of indigenous hardwoods were felled using saws and transported
from the forest using tractors. No evidence of large-scale commercial logging and
charcoal burning was noticed.
Human settlements and crop (maize, beans, tea) cultivation extended up to the forest
edges in some parts of Singoro-Irewa and Kamokuywo-Epeso Hill transects where a
barrier of Nyayo Tea Zone was unavailable/lacking. Nyayo Tea Zone is a 50M wide strip
of area planted with tea around forests in Kenya to act as a barrier against encroachment
of human settlements or cultivation into protected forest reserves (Fig 6). However, it
was not possible to establish how much of human encroachment was happening in the
same manner around the entire forest.
DISCUSSION: A total of 108 bird species were recorded in this forest, this represents
about 68% (108/160) of 160 recorded in North Nandi Forest in the past (Zimmerman, et
al, 1996). Additional bird species from this site can be recorded by using long term
surveys which combine different methods in different seasons both day and night (Bibby,
et al., 1998). The current work also covered a very small area (about 157 ha) of 10,500ha
of the entire area of North Nandi Forest. Additional species could also be recorded by
covering different habitats found in the forest such as wetlands, grasslands and
plantations.
11
A total of 33 forest specialists were recorded in this survey. Forest specialists are the true
forest birds, rarely occurring in non forest habitat, but characteristic of the interior of
little-disturbed forest, where they breed (Bennun and Howell, 2002). Forests with large
number of forest specialist birds have relatively good habitat conditions as a result of
minimal human habitat disturbance. A total of 21 Afro-tropical highland bird species
were recorded, which represented 62 % (21/34) of 34 individuals recorded in the IBA in
the past (Bennun and Njoroge, 1999). Additionally, the 21 Guineo-congolian Forest
Biome bird species recorded represented 88% (21/24) of the 24 biome species recorded
in this forest in past. Therefore, the record of large number of biome-restricted species in
the small area in the current short study probably indicates that North Nandi Forest has
faced minimal habitat degradation for the last 10 years (1999 Bennun and Njoroge,
1999)-2009). Even though, the forest was facing habitat threats such as uncontrolled
cattle grazing, subsistence extraction of building and fencing poles; firewood collection
etc the section surveyed appeared to be healthy and capable of supporting sensitive
avifauna and other biodiversity. No evidence of large-scale commercial timber extraction
and charcoal burning recorded in the past (Bennun and Njoroge, 1999) were noticed in
the section surveyed in the current study.
The globally threatened Chapin’s Flycatcher was not record even though this IBA is one
of the most important sites (Bennun and Njoroge, 1999) for it in Kenya. The species is a
scarce resident (Zimmerman et al. 1996) of the Kakamega Forest Important Bird Area.
The lack of obvious detection cues in this species such as audible calls, large sizes,
plumage coloration and flocking makes it challenging to detect in the forest (Musila, et
al, 2004). However, the existing healthy habitat condition in the surveyed section is likely
to support the flycatcher. The globally threatened Turner’s Eremomela (Vulnerable) was
recorded in this survey. This species has been recorded in adjacent South Nandi Forest
(its stronghold) and Kakamega Forest (Bennun and Njoroge, 1999). A regionally
endangered Southern Hyliota was also recorded in this survey. Eight individuals of the
hyliotas were recorded feeding in the forest canopies. Other regionally threatened bird
species such as African Green Ibis, African Crown Eagle, Red-chested Owlet, Thick-
billed Honeyguide, Least Honeyguide, Grey-chested Illadopsis and Yellow-bellied (all
12
vulnerable) were not recorded. Long-term surveys in different section of the indigenous
forest habitat in future can determine the status of the regionally and the two globally
threatened bird species.
Overall the forest habitat in the part of the North Nandi Forest surveyed appeared to be in
good habitat condition. However, the uncontrolled allowance of cattle grazing in the
forest might interfere with the rate of forest regeneration. This might be happening
through trampling of young germinating tree seedlings by animals as well as feeding and
damaging of young saplings by grazing animals. Additionally, even though firewood
collection seemed to be controlled through issuance of permits, the continuous removal
of dead wood by the surrounding community might affect the density and distribution of
cavity nesting bird species (eg wood peckers) due to the decline in quantity of holes and
food (invertebrates which they feed on) Waiyaki, 1995). The extraction of fencing poles
illegally by locals targeting dead trees might in the future go for the live hard woods
when the dead trees are completely exploited
To address some of the conservation challenges facing North Nandi some conservation
interventions have been implemented. A community based organisation group (Pyramid
Youth Group) based near the forest in partnership with the Kenya Forest Service official
has been involved in re-afforestation program. At total of 7000 indigenous tree seedlings
were planted in logged and open areas in 2009. This was a positive conservation measure
aimed at mobilising the community to participate in the conservation of the forest which
provides important ecosystem service and resources to locals such as water, firewood,
forage and medicinal plants.
The Kenya Forest Service (KFS) has intensified security operation in this forest. Three
security posts for increasing policing for illegal activities of the forest have been set up.
These are located around the forest in Chomisha, Kipsamoite and Septonok. Regular
patrols and apprehending of culprits has reduced dramatically the levels of wildlife
hunting and illegal extraction of forest products. The KFS forest guards together with
13
home guards (community guards-locals recruited to assist the government in the
provision of security) located around the forests also assist in weeding re-afforested areas
and prevent grazing animals from accessing areas where 7000 seedlings were planted.
The Nyayo Tea Zone a Kenyan Government Parastatal has been active in establishing
strips of tea in between the forest edge and local communities in North Nandi Forest. The
tea zone is a forest conservation strategy in Kenya (Fig 6) which aims to prevent
encroachment of human settlements and cultivation into the protected forest areas.
Evidence of on-going establishment of the Nyayo Tea Zone were witnessed in all
transects surveyed. However, some sections Kamokuywo-Epeso Hill and Kamokuywo-
Chesombe transects lacked this barrier. It was not possible to establish how much of the
entire North Nandi Forest lacked the barrier, but sections having the tea barrier in place
were secure and unlikely to be encroached by human activities which directly convert the
forest area into different land-uses in future.
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS: North Nandi Forest is rich in
avifauna. The forest section surveyed appeared to be in good habitat condition. It had a
rich potential for eco-tourism which has not been exploited. The thick forest canopy was
rich in interesting birds and many mammals (Black and White Colobus Monkey Colobus
guereza, Blue Monkey Cercopithecus mitis, Red-tailed Monkey C. ascanius, African
Giant Squirrel Protoxerus stangeri (all seen in this survey) and Potto Perodicticus potto,
Lord Derby’s Anomalure Anomalurus derbianus and African Palm Civet Nandinia
binotata, (not seen in this survey). The Epeso Hill in the middle of the forest with a few
rock outcrops provide a very fantastic view of the forest canopy for bird and mammal
watching and camping site (Fig 4 and 5). Even though the section of the forest surveyed
appeared to be in relatively good habitat condition, there is need to build the capacity of
the increasing human population living adjacent to the forest to actively participate in
activities which will simultaneously improve forest conservation and address their
livelihoods. The following interventions are therefore proposed;
14
1. More surveys should be extended into the western parts of the forest in order to
understand the status of that section of the forest.
2. More detailed biodiversity surveys and ecological researches are required to
enable better understanding of North Nandi forest biodiversity and human
interaction.
3. Mapping of the North Nandi Forest to establish the actual sizes of the different
habitat such as indigenous forest, wetland, glades and other open areas and
plantations.
4. Local people around the forest reserve need to be engaged in livelihood activities
which have minimum impact on the forest habitat such as;
• Practise conservation agriculture-growing crops using agricultural
techniques which conserve biodiversity and maximise yields.
• Plant woodlots in the households to be source of firewood, building and
fencing poles.
• Locals should be assisted with marketing of agricultural products such as
maize, milk, tea, vegetable in order to prevent exploitation by middle men.
• Bee-keeping and fish-farming as being championed by Pyramid Youth
Group should be developed in the area to increase household income.
5. There is need to build the capacity of Members of Pyramid Youth Group
(operating in Kapchepkok Sub-location) to participate in biodiversity monitoring
and strengthening of their environmental education program in order to reach
many members of the community (Fig 4).
15
REFERENCES
Bennun, L., Dranzoa, C. and Pomeroy, D. (1996). The Forest Birds of Kenya and Uganda. J. E. Afr. Nat. Hist. 85: 23-48. Bennun, L. and Njoroge, P. (1999). Important Bird Areas in Kenya. East Africa Natural History Society, Nairobi, Kenya. Bibby, C. Jones, M.and Marsden, S. (1998). Bird Surfeys. Expendition Field Techniques. Expendition Adfisory Center, London. Bibby. C.J., Burges, N.D., & Hill, D.A. (1992). Bird Census Techniques. Academic Press. London. Birdlife International. (2000). Threatened Birds of the World. Barcelona: Lynx Edicions. pp 2403. Musila, S. N., Ngweno, F., Matiku, P., Bennun, L., Kanyanya, E., Mulwa, R., Mwema, M., Kiragu, A., Siele, J., Musina, J., Buckley, P., Machekele, J.and Njihia, S. (eds) (2005). Important Bird Areas (IBAs) Status and Trends Report 2005. Unpublished Report. Nairobi: Nature Kenya. pp 60.
Musila, S. N., Muchane, M. and Ndang’anga, K. (2004). The distribution and population status of Chapins’ Flycatcher Muscicapa lendu in Kakamega Forest. National Museums of Kenya. Center of Biodiversity Report. Nairobi.
Ng’weno, F., Otieno, N. and Matiku, P. eds.( 2005). Important Birds areas Status and Trends 2004. East Africa Natural History Society, Nairobi, Kenya. Stattersfield, A.J., Crosby, M.J., Long, A.J. & Wege, D.C. (1998). Endemic bird areas of the world: priorities for biodifersity conserfation. BirdLife Conserfation Series no. 7. Cambridge: BirdLife International. Waiyaki, E. (1995). Effects of Forest Fragmentation, Isolation, and Structure on the Richness and Abundance of Bird Communities in Major Coastal Forests of South coast, Kenya. Unpublished MSc. Thesis, university Kent at Canterbury. pp 75. Zimmerman, D.A, Turner, D.A. & Pearson, D.J. (1996). Birds of Kenya and Northern Tanzania. Halfway House, South Africa: Russel Friedman Books.
16
ANNEXES
Appendix 1: List of bird species recorded in the five transects in the eastern side of North Nandi Forest IBA
BIRD SPECIES
NUMBER
RECORDED
FOREST BIRD
CATEGORY
HIGHLAND-
TROPICAL
FOREST
BIRDS
(ATHBS)
GUINEO-
CONGOLIANS
FOREST
BIRDS (GCBS)
1 African Blue Flycatcher Elminia longicauda 11 F
2 African Citril Serinus citrinelloides* 5 F ATHBS
3 African Dusky Flycatcher Muscicapa adusta 3 F
4 African Emerald Cuckoo Chrysococcyx cupreus 2 F
5 African Goshawk Accipiter tachiro 2 F
6 African Green Pigeon Treron calva 4 F
7 African Hill Babbler Pseudoalcippe byssinica 4 FF ATHBS
8 African Paradise Flycatcher Terpsiphone viridis 16 f
9 African Thrush Turdus pelios 2 f
10 Baglafecht Weaver Ploceus baglafecht 3 F ATHBS
11 Bearded Woodpecker Dendropicos namaquus 1 f
12 Black Saw-Wing Psalidoprocne holomelas 4 f
13 Black-collared Apalis Apalis pulchra 52 F ATHBS
14 Black-crowned Waxbill Estrilda nonnula 2 f
15 Black-cuckoo Shrike Campephaga flava 1 f
16 Black-faced Rofous Warbler Bathmocercus rufus 10 FF
17 Black-throated Wattle-eye Platysteira peltata 3 F
18 Black-white Casqued Hornbill Bycanistes subcylindricus 1 F GCBS
19 Blue-shouldered Robin Chat Cossypha cyanocampter 10 F GCBS
20 Bronze Sunbird Nectarinia kilimensis 2 F ATHBS
21 Brown Illadopsis Trichastoma fulvescens 2 FF GCBS
22 Brown-capped Weaver Ploceus insignis 7 FF ATHBS
23 Brown-chested Alethe Alethe poliocephala 17 FF
24 Brown-eared Woodpecker Campethera caroli 1 F GCBS
25 Buff-throated Apalis Apalis rufogularis 40 FF GCBS
26 Cabanis Greenbul Phyllastrephus cabanisi 110 FF
27 Cameroon Sombre Greenbul Andropadus curvirostris 2 FF GCBS
28 Cardinal Woodpecker Dendropicos fuscescens 1 f
29 Chestnut Wattle-eye Dyaphorophyia castanea 3 FF GCBS
30 Chubb's Cisticola Cisticola chubby 24 F ATHBS
31 Cinnamon-chested Bee-eater Merops oreobates 24 F ATHBS
32 Collared Sunbird Anthreptes collaris 4 F
33 Common Bulbul hycnonotus barbatus 88 f
34 Common Drongo Dicrurus adsimilis 3 f
17
CONT. BIRD SPECIES
NUMBER
RECORDED
FOREST BIRD
CATEGORY
HIGHLAND-
TROPICAL
FOREST
BIRDS
(ATHBS)
GUINEO-
CONGOLIANS
FOREST
BIRDS (GCBS)
35 Common Stonechat Saxicola torquatus 2 f
36 Common Wattle-eye Platysteira cyanea 5 f
37 Crowned Hornbill Tockus alboterminatus 3 f
38 Dark-backed Weaver Ploceus bicolor 9 F
39 Diedrick Cuckoo Chrysococcyx caprius 3 f
40 Dusky Tit Parus funereus 19 FF GCBS
41 Dusky-crested Flycatcher Elminia nigromitrata 2 F
42 Equatorial Akalat Sheppardia eaquatorialis 7 FF ATHBS
43 Fine-banded Woodpecker Campethera tullbergi 2 FF ATHBS
44 Grassland Pipit Anthus cinnamomeus 4 f
45 Great Sparrowhawk Accipiter Melanoleucus 1 F
46 Green-headed Sunbird Nectarinia verticalis 5 F, GCBS GCBS
47 Grey Cuckoo-shrike Coracina caesia 1 FF, ATHBS ATHBS
48 Grey-backed Cameroptera cameroptera brachyura 69 f
49 Grey-backed Fiscal Lanius excubitoroides 4 f
50 Grey-capped Warbler Eminia lepida 2 f
51 Grey-headed Bush-shrike Malaconotus blanchoti 9 F GCBS
52 Grey-headed Negrofinch Nigrita canicapilla 2 FF
53 Grey-throated Barbet Gymnobucco bonapartei 25 F
54 Hartlaub's Turaco Tauraco hartlaubi 2 FF ATHBS
55 Honey-guide Greenbul Baeopogon indicator 10 FF GCBS
56 Jameson Wattle-eye Dyaphorophyia jamesoni 7 FF GCBS
57 Joyful Greenbul Chlorocichla laetisssima 5 F ATHBS
58 Klaas's Cuckoo Chrysococcyx klaas 1 f
59 Lesser Honeyguide indicator minor 4 f
60 Little Rock Thrush Monticola r. rufocinereus * 2 f
61 Long-crested Eagle Lophaetus occipitalis 3 f
62 Luhder's Bush-shrike Laniarius luethderi 30 F
63 Mountain Greenbul Anthropadus nigriceps 1 FF ATHBS
64 Mountain Illadopsis Trichastoma pyrrhopterum 2 FF ATHBS
65 Narina Trogon Apaloderma narina 1 F
66 Northern Black Flycatcher Melaenornis ardesiacus 1 f
67 Northern-double Colored Sunbird Nectarinia preussi 19 F ATHBS
68 Olive Sunbird Nectarinia olivacea 23 FF
69 Petit's Cuckoo-shrike Campephaga petit 3 FF GCBS
70 Pink-footed Puff Back Dryoscopus angolensis 2 FF
71 Pin-tailed Whydah Vidua macroura 5 f
72 Red-chested Cuckoo Cuculus solitaries 6 F
73 Red-headed Bluebill Spermophaga ruficapilla 10 F
74 Red-tailed Ant Thrush Neocossyhpus rufus 1 FF
18
CONT. BIRD SPECIES
NUMBER
RECORDED
FOREST BIRD
CATEGORY
HIGHLAND-
TROPICAL
FOREST
BIRDS
(ATHBS)
GUINEO-
CONGOLIANS
FOREST
BIRDS (GCBS)
75 Red-tailed Bristle-bill Bleda syndactyla 2 FF GCBS
76 Ring-necked Dove Streptopelia capicola 2 f
77 Ross's Turaco Musophaga rossae 4 F
78 Scaly-breasted Illadopsis Illadopsis albipectus 8 FF GCBS
79 Shelly's Greenbul Anthropadus masukuensis 4 FF ATHBS
80 Singing Cisticola Cisticola cantans 4 f
81 Slender-billed Greenbul Andropadus gracilirostris 2 FF
82 Snowy-headed Robin Chat Cossypha niveicapilla 1 F
83 Southern Hyliota Hyliota australis 8 F
84 Speckled Mousebird Colius striatus 14 f
85 Streaky Seed-eater Serinus striolatus 8 F ATHBS
86 Stuhlmann's Starling Poeoptera stuhlmanni 39 FF ATHBS
87 Tambourine Dove Turtur tympanistria 16 F
88 Tropical Boubou Laniarius aethiopicus 6 f
89 Turner's Eremomela Eremomela turneri 5 FF GCBS
90 Uganda-woodland Warbler Phylloscopus budongoensis 12 FF GCBS
91 Variable Sunbird Nectarinia venusta 23 f
92 Violet-backed Starling Cinnyricinclus leucogaster 12 f
93 Western Black-headed OrioleOriolus brachyrhynchus 6 F GCBS
94 White-bellied Tit Parus albiventris 5 f
95 White-chinned Prinia Prinia leucopogon 13 F
96 White-eyed Slaty Flycatcher Melaenornis fischeri 10 F ATHBS
97 White-headed Saw-Wing Psalidoprocne holomelas 1 f
98 White-headed Wood-hoopoe Phoeniculus bollei 4 FF
99 White-spotted Flufftail Sarothrura pulchra* 4 F GCBS
100 White-tailed Crested Flycatcher Trochocercus albonotatus 3 FF ATHBS
101 White-tailed Ant Thrush Neocossyphus poenis praepectoralis 14 FF GCBS
102 Willow Warbler Phyllscopus trochilus 5 F
103 Yellow Throated Leaflove Chlorocichla flavicollis 2 F
104 Yellow White-eye Zosterops senegalensis 121 f
105 Yellow-billed Barbet Trachylaemus purpuratus 2 F GCBS
106 Yellow-crested Woodpecker Dendropicos xantholophus 1 F
107 Yellow-rumped Tinkerbird Pogoniulus bilineatus 55 F
108 Yellow-whiskered Greenbul Anthropadus latirostris 186 F
Legend: f-forest visitor, F-forest generalist, FF-forest specialist, ATHBS-Afro-Tropical Highland Biome Species, GCBS-Guineo-congolian Biome Specie, * species recorded through opportunistic bird surveys.
19
Appendix 2: Photo galleries of North Nandi Forest Expedition
Fig 2: Wetland in North Nandi Forest which goes out of the forest in Ngatatia
village in Kapchepkok Sub-location
Fig 3: Thick forest canopy in North Nandi Forest-a view from Epeso Hill a potential site for bird and mammal watching and camping.
20
Fig 4: Children from neighboring school visiting Pyramid Youth Group as part of environmental education program conducted by the members.
Fig 5: Members of North Nandi Forest survey team at Epeso Hill. Notice the mist and the thick forest canopy in the background.
21
Fig 6: Nyayo Tea Zone (much greener strip) in between the protected forest and community to prevent human encroachment. QUOTING THE REPORT Musila, S., Syingi, A. M. and Sajita, N. (2010). Assessing the conservation status of avifauna and the forest habitat of North Nandi Important Bird Area, Kenya. National Museums of Kenya. Nairobi.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT: We would like to acknowledge the financial support provided by the African Bird Club (ABC) to conduct this survey. Permission to conduct this work in North Nandi Forest was provided by Director-Kenya Forest Service in Nairobi and supported on the ground by Mrs. R. J. Seroney-District Forest Officer North Nandi Forest. We are also very grateful to Francis Rono-Chairman of Pyramid Youth Group a community group based at Kapchepkok about 500M from the forest for the warm welcome and facilitation during the fieldwork period. Members of pyramid group were also very supportive; of particular mention is Kimila-Zephania who was our daily forest guide, Simon Birgen for providing traditional herbs to sort out our illness, Marcellar Jebitok for organizing purchase of our foods and other field logistical arrangements and Kipchirichiri-chiri our cook. Finally we would like to acknowledge the support provided by our employers the National Museum of Kenya and Kakamega Environmental Education Program (KEEP). For all we say ‘Nothing is impossible-yes we can-yes we made it’
22
SUMMARY BUDGET; 1 £ =120 KES
BUDGET PARTICULARS SUBSISTENCE & ACCOMODATION
NUMBER
COST/DAY
DAYS
TOTAL
Research Scientist 1 20.8 15 312.5Research Assistants 2 12.5 15 375.0Local Guide 2 5.8 10 116.7Sub-totals 804.2 TRANSPORTATION Nairobi-North Nandi (Kapsabet) 2 10.0 1 20.0North Nandi-Nairobi (Kapsabet) 2 10.0 1 20.0Kakamega-North Nandi (Kapsabet) 1 8.3 1 8.3North Nandi-Kakamega (Kapsabet) 1 8.3 1 8.3TAX (Nairobi & Kapsabet) 2 12.5 1 25.0Sub-totals 81.7 COMMUNICATION Credit (Safaricom& Zain) 1 25.0 1 25.0Sub-totals 25.0 STATIONERY Stationery 1 16.7 1 8.3Toner Purchase 1 41.7 1 41.7Colour Printing and Posting of Reports 1 8.3 1 8.3Guide Book (mammals) and Cooking Equipment 1 24.2 1 24.9Sub-totals 83.3 FUND BALANCE 5.9GRAND TOTAL 994.1