a progress with pt mire alla yurova hydrometcentre of russia

15
A progress with PT Mire Alla Yurova Hydrometcentre of Russia

Upload: holly-walker

Post on 13-Dec-2015

226 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: A progress with PT Mire Alla Yurova Hydrometcentre of Russia

A progress with PT MireAlla Yurova

Hydrometcentre of Russia

Page 2: A progress with PT Mire Alla Yurova Hydrometcentre of Russia

Priority task: mire parameterization

Ground water

Modified TERRA MMWH modelRg, Rs

Latent heat flux (LHF)parameterizationWater content (WC)

LHFThermal conductivitydependency on WC

Surface fluxes and soil temperatureverification SCLM

Page 3: A progress with PT Mire Alla Yurova Hydrometcentre of Russia

External parameter database:mire distribution. Example of St Petersburg region

COSMO, soil_type=8 TERRA satellite image processing (Bartalev et al)

Page 4: A progress with PT Mire Alla Yurova Hydrometcentre of Russia

00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.9

0.25 0.5 0.75 1

normalizad water content

ther

mal

con

duct

ivity

, W

m-1

K-1 model meas

00.10.20.30.4

0.50.60.70.80.9

0.25 0.5 0.75 1

normalized water content

ther

mal

con

duct

ivity

, W

m-1

K-1

model meas

Peat thermal conductivity as a function of normalized water content: a) as in original TERRA parameterization, b) according to new parameterization and observed.

Peat thermal conductivity

Johansen equation from TERRA used. Peat-specific parameters from Lawrence and Slater(2007), reverse problem solved to obtain Kersten number as a function of water content

Page 5: A progress with PT Mire Alla Yurova Hydrometcentre of Russia

Formulation for the shallow WT

W=Fleff-q,GW=- W(sat-)q=lq·i·K_h(zcat-zwt),

W, -water content, Fleff- gravitational water flux from the layer above minus capillary rise, q-runoff, sat-porosity,i-slope of the water table,·K_h-transmissivity coefficient, lq-lumped parameter

WTWeighted average between saturated and unsaturated water content in the layer Zk goesTo Richards’ equation

Zk

Page 6: A progress with PT Mire Alla Yurova Hydrometcentre of Russia

Results: water content in soil . March 2011

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0 1 2

WC

lay

er

t=1

t=2

t=3

t=4

t=5

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0 1 2

WC

laye

r

t=1

t=2

t=3

t=4

t=5

Ground water parameterizationGWstart=1.5 m

Standard run

Page 7: A progress with PT Mire Alla Yurova Hydrometcentre of Russia

,,1

,)()()(, 33

2210

Lwt

LwtLwtLwtLwt

zzif

zzifzzszzszzssmmPETET

25,617.0

6525,53.0

65,427.0

wt

wt

wt

zifPETET

zifPETET

zifPETET1

2

ET-evapotranspirationРЕТ-potential ET

y = -0.1671x2 + 8.2973x - 27.163R2 = 0.9863

0102030405060708090

20 25 30 35 40

WTD, cm

mea

n E

T,

WT

/m2 Measurements at Degero

Stormyr mire, summer 2008

Evapotranspiration parameterization

Page 8: A progress with PT Mire Alla Yurova Hydrometcentre of Russia

Results: surface fluxes at Degero Stormyr mire, July 2008, SCLM simulations

020406080

100120140

H LE

mea

n f

lux,

W/m

2

meas mod

Page 9: A progress with PT Mire Alla Yurova Hydrometcentre of Russia

Results: Bowen ratio Degero Stormyr mire, July 2008, SCLM simulations

-2.5

-2

-1.5

-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

01

.07

.08

0:0

0

01

.07

.08

13

:00

02

.07

.08

2:0

0

02

.07

.08

15

:00

03

.07

.08

4:0

0

03

.07

.08

17

:00

04

.07

.08

6:0

0

04

.07

.08

19

:00

05

.07

.08

8:0

0

05

.07

.08

21

:00

06

.07

.08

10

:00

06

.07

.08

23

:00

07

.07

.08

12

:00

08

.07

.08

1:0

0

08

.07

.08

14

:00

09

.07

.08

3:0

0

09

.07

.08

16

:00

10

.07

.08

5:0

0

10

.07

.08

18

:00

11

.07

.08

7:0

0

11

.07

.08

20

:00

12

.07

.08

9:0

0

12

.07

.08

22

:00

13

.07

.08

11

:00

14

.07

.08

0:0

0

14

.07

.08

13

:00

15

.07

.08

2:0

0

15

.07

.08

15

:00

16

.07

.08

4:0

0

measmodel

Page 10: A progress with PT Mire Alla Yurova Hydrometcentre of Russia

Results: soil temperature at 2 cm Degero Stormyr mire, July 2008, SCLM simulations.

Effect of initialization

Page 11: A progress with PT Mire Alla Yurova Hydrometcentre of Russia

Results: soil temperature at 2 cm Degero Stormyr mire, July 2008, SCLM simulations.

Effect of hydraulic diffusivity in the upper peat layer

Page 12: A progress with PT Mire Alla Yurova Hydrometcentre of Russia

2m temperature difference between the modified (with the mire parameterization) and the standard COSMO model. 36h forecast, starting at 00 UTC, 10 August 2011, COSMO-RU domain

Results of the tests with the mire parameterization in the 3D COSMO model

Page 13: A progress with PT Mire Alla Yurova Hydrometcentre of Russia

Conclusions

• In many areas in Russia mires are more numerous then indicated by soil_type=8

• The parameterization of soil water is very sensitive to initial conditions

• More advanced parameterization is needed for the vertical structure of hydraulic conductivity and diffusivity

Page 14: A progress with PT Mire Alla Yurova Hydrometcentre of Russia

Additional ideas arisen from the PT

• Varying depth lower boundary conditions could be use for the whole hydrophobic-dry soil gradient

• …but initialization scheme should be use to assimilate ground water depth data

• Draining and rewetting mires changes the regional climate

• Rice paddies are significant modifiers of the temperature regime in Asia

Page 15: A progress with PT Mire Alla Yurova Hydrometcentre of Russia

Thanks for cooperation and your attention!