a practical guide and new trends to price european options
TRANSCRIPT
HAL Id: hal-01322698https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01322698v1
Preprint submitted on 27 May 2016 (v1), last revised 18 Nov 2016 (v2)
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open accessarchive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-entific research documents, whether they are pub-lished or not. The documents may come fromteaching and research institutions in France orabroad, or from public or private research centers.
Lโarchive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, estdestinรฉe au dรฉpรดt et ร la diffusion de documentsscientifiques de niveau recherche, publiรฉs ou non,รฉmanant des รฉtablissements dโenseignement et derecherche franรงais ou รฉtrangers, des laboratoirespublics ou privรฉs.
A practical guide and new trends to price Europeanoptions under Exponential Lรฉvy models
Khaled Salhi
To cite this version:Khaled Salhi. A practical guide and new trends to price European options under Exponential Lรฉvymodels. 2016. hal-01322698v1
A practical guide and new trends to price Europeanoptions under Exponential Lรฉvy models
Khaled Salhi a,b,c,โ
May 27, 2016
Abstract
In this paper we develop a thorough survey of the European option pricing underexponential Lรฉvy models. We sweep all steps from equivalent martingale measuresconstruction to numerical valuation of the option price under these measures. Weapply the Esscher transform technique to provide two examples of equivalent martin-gale measures: the Esscher martingale measure and the minimal entropy martingalemeasure. We numerically compute the option price using the fast Fourier transform.The results are detailed with an example of each exponential Lรฉvy class. The maincontribution of this paper is to build a comprehensive study from the theoreticalpoint of view to practical numerical illustration and to give a complete characteri-zation of the studied equivalent martingale measures by discussing their similarityand their applicability in practice.
Keywords: Lรฉvy process, incomplete market, Esscher martingale measure, minimal en-tropy martingale measure, fast Fourier transform, Merton model, variance gamma model.
1 IntroductionStochastic processes are intensively used for modeling financial markets. The Black &Scholes model is one of the most known models. It describes the stock price as a geometricBrownian motion. In this context, the option pricing problem is solved using the riskneutral approach [7]. The key tool is the uniqueness of the equivalent martingale measure(EMM) and the derivative price is therefore the unique arbitrage-free contingent claimvalue.
It has become clear, however, that this option pricing model is inconsistent withoptions data. In the real world, we observe that asset price processes have jumps orspikes and risk managers have to take them into consideration. Moreover, the empiricaldistributions of asset returns exhibit fat tails and skewness behaviors that deviate froma Universitรฉ de Lorraine, Institut Elie Cartan de Lorraine, UMR 7502, Vandoeuvre-lรจs-Nancy, F-54506,
France.b CNRS, Institut Elie Cartan de Lorraine, UMR 7502, Vandoeuvre-lรจs-Nancy, F-54506, France.c Inria, Villers-lรจs-Nancy, F-54600, France.โ Email: [email protected]
1
normality [4]. Hence, models that accurately fit return distributions are essential toestimate profit ans loss (P&L) distributions. Similarly, in the risk-neutral world, weobserve that implied volatilities are constant neither across strikes nor across maturitiesas stipulated by the Black & Scholes model [35, 36]. Therefore, traders need modelsthat can capture the behavior of the implied volatility smiles more accurately, in order tohandle the risk of trades. Lรฉvy processes provide the appropriate tools to adequately andconsistently describe all these observations, both in the real world and in the risk-neutralworld [3, 14, 15, 31].
By allowing the stock price process to jump, problems become more complicated. Assoon as the security can have more than a single jump size, the market will be incomplete.Thus, under the assumption of no arbitrage, there are infinitely many equivalent martin-gale measures. This induces an interval of arbitrage-free prices. In order to construct anoption pricing model, we have to select a suitable martingale measure. Once an equivalentmartingale measure Pห is selected, the price ๐p๐ปq of an option ๐ป is given by
๐p๐ปq โ Eหr๐ยด๐๐๐ปs, (1)
where ๐ is the risk-free interest rate and ๐ is a maturity. This is the idea of the equivalentmartingale measure method.
This survey is a practical guide to option pricing when the log of the stock priceis modeled with a Lรฉvy process. This work aims at explaining in a single documentall stages of the option valuation process, as a global understanding of this process isnecessary and useful for a practical purposes. Considering a price process model underthe historical probability measure, we explicit this model under an equivalent martingalemeasure. Then, we numerically compute the option price using the fast Fourier transformtechnique (FFT) developed in [10].
Outline. This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we give an overview ofthe exponential Lรฉvy model and the option pricing in this context. For backgroundinformation on exponential Lรฉvy models, the reader may refer to textbooks [1, 12]. InSection 3, we explain how to define an equivalent martingale measure Pห using the Esschertransform technique. We detail two examples: the Esscher martingale measure and theminimal entropy martingale measure. For these measures, the logarithm stock priceprocess is still a Lรฉvy process under Pห and its characteristic triplet is known. Thesimilarity between the Esscher martingale measure and the minimal entropy martingalemeasure is studied. Otherwise, we show that while the former is still a good tool forpricing applications, the latter cannot be applied in a practical context. In Section 4,we give the Madan-Carr method and develop an expression of the option price, based onthe characteristic function of the log price process. The application of the FFT here ispossible and will be the subject of Section 5. Finally, in Section 6, we detail our approachon three examples of exponential Lรฉvy models: the standard Black & Scholes model, theMerton model and the variance gamma model.
2 Exponential Lรฉvy modelIn this section, we introduce the exponential Lรฉvy model and give some of its properties.
Definition 2.1. Let pฮฉ,โฑ , pโฑ๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s,Pq be a filtered probability space satisfying the usualconditions. The exponential Lรฉvy model is defined by an asset price process p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s ofthe form:
๐๐ก โ ๐0 ๐๐๐ก , (2)
2
where ๐0 ฤ 0 is a constant and p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s is a one-dimensional Lรฉvy process [1, 6, 38]with a characteristic triplet p๐, ๐2, ๐q. The discounted price is given by ๐๐ก โ ๐ยด๐๐ก๐๐ก where ๐is the risk-free interest rate.
Notation. In the sequel, the notations used in Definition 2.1 will always be valid.
The measure ๐ on R, called the Lรฉvy measure, determines the intensity of jumps ofdifferent sizes: ๐pr๐1, ๐2sq is the expected number of jumps on the time interval r0, 1s,whose sizes fall in r๐1, ๐2s. The Lรฉvy measure satisfies the integrability condition
ลผ
R1^ |๐ฅ|2๐pd๐ฅq ฤ 8.
Note that ๐pr๐1, ๐2sq is still finite for any compact set r๐1, ๐2s such that 0 R r๐1, ๐2s. Ifnot, the process p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s would have an infinite number of jumps of finite size on everytime interval r0, ๐กs, which contradicts the cร dlร g property of p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s. Thus ๐ definesa Radon measure on Rzt0u. However, ๐ is not necessarily a finite measure. The aboverestriction still allows it to blow up at zero and p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s may have an infinite number ofsmall jumps on r0, ๐กs. In this case, the sum of the jumps becomes an infinite series andits convergence imposes some additional conditions on the measure ๐.
The law of ๐๐ก at any time ๐ก is determined by the triplet p๐, ๐2, ๐q. In particular, theLรฉvy-Khintchine representation gives the characteristic function of p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s under P
ฮฆ๐กp๐ขq :โ Er๐๐๐ข๐๐กs โ ๐๐กฮจp๐ขq, ๐ข P R (3)
where ฮจ, called the characteristic exponent, is given by
ฮจp๐ขq โ ๐๐๐ขยด1
2๐2๐ข2
`
ลผ
R
`
๐๐๐ข๐ฅ ยด 1ยด ๐๐ข๐ฅ1|๐ฅ|ฤ1ห
๐pd๐ฅq. (4)
Furthermore, if the Lรฉvy measure also satisfies the conditionล
|๐ฅ|ฤ1|๐ฅ|๐pd๐ฅq ฤ 8, the
jump part process, defined by๐๐ฝ
๐ก โรฟ
๐ Pp0,๐กsฮ๐๐ โฐ0
โ๐๐ ,
becomes a finite variation process. In this case, the process p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s can be expressedas the sum of a linear drift, a Brownian motion and a jump part process:
๐๐ก โ ๐พ๐ก` ๐๐ต๐ก `๐๐ฝ๐ก ,
where ๐พ โ ๐ยดล
|๐ฅ|ฤ1๐ฅ๐pd๐ฅq. The characteristic exponent can be expressed by
ฮจp๐ขq โ ๐๐พ๐ขยด1
2๐2๐ข2
`
ลผ
R
`
๐๐๐ข๐ฅ ยด 1ห
๐pd๐ฅq.
Note that the Lรฉvy triplet of p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s is not given by p๐พ, ๐2, ๐q, but by p๐, ๐2, ๐q. Infact, ๐ is not an intrinsic quantity and depends on the truncation function used in theLรฉvy-Khintchine representation while ๐พ has an intrinsic interpretation as the expectationslope of the continuous part process of p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s. The expectation Er๐๐กs is given by thesum of the linear drift and the expectation of jump part equal to p๐พ `
ล
R ๐ฅ๐pd๐ฅqq๐ก.
3
Now, by using Itรดโs formula, we can observe that p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s is the solution to thefollowing SDE
๐๐ก โ ๐0 `
ลผ
p0,๐กs
๐๐ ยด๐๐ , (5)
where๐ก :โ ๐๐ก `
1
2x๐๐
y๐ก `รฟ
๐ Pp0,๐กs
t๐ฮ๐๐ ยด 1ยดโ๐๐ u (6)
and p๐๐๐ก q๐กPr0,๐ s is the continuous part of p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s. Hence, p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s can be rewritten as:
๐๐ก โ ๐0 โฐpq๐ก, (7)
where pโฐpq๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s stands for the Dolรฉans-Dade exponential of p๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s, [27]. Further-more, p๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s is still a Lรฉvy process under P. By expressing its Lรฉvy-Itรด decomposition,we obtain that the characteristic triplet of p๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s is given by p, ๐2, ๐q (see [12, 19] fordetails) where
โ ๐`1
2๐2`
ลผ
|๐ฅ|ฤ1
๐ฅ๐pd๐ฅq ยด
ลผ
|๐ฅ|ฤ1
๐ฅ๐pd๐ฅq (8)
and๐pd๐ฅq โ ๐ ห ๐ฝยด1pd๐ฅq where ๐ฝp๐ฅq :โ ๐๐ฅ ยด 1 for ๐ฅ P R. (9)
Remark 2.1. (i) It holds that
suppt๐u ฤ pยด1,8q.
(ii) If ๐ has a density ๐p๐ฅq, then ๐ has a density ๐p๐ฅq given by
๐p๐ฅq โ1
1` ๐ฅ๐plogp1` ๐ฅqq.
(iii) From the economical point of view, p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s represents the logarithmic return pro-cess of p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s, while p๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s represents the simple return process of p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s.
We consider a call with maturity ๐ and strike ๐พ. The payoff of this option is given bythe random variable ๐ป โ p๐๐ ยด๐พq`. Let ๐ซ denote the set of all equivalent martingalemeasures (also called risk-neutral measures)
๐ซ โ!
Pห โ P, p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s is a martingale under Pห)
.
In a complete market, there is only one equivalent martingale measure Pห. Then, therisk-neutral price of the option at ๐ก โ 0 is given by
๐ถp๐พq โ ๐ยด๐๐Eหrp๐๐ ยด๐พq`s, (10)
where Eห is the expectation under Pห.With exponential Lรฉvy models, we are mostly in the incomplete market case. There-
fore, several equivalent martingale measures can be used to price the option. The rangeof option prices is given by
โ
infPหP๐ซ
๐ยด๐๐Eหrp๐๐ ยด๐พq`s, supPหP๐ซ
๐ยด๐๐Eหrp๐๐ ยด๐พq`s
.
4
So, one can always choose a measure Pห P ๐ซ according to some criteria and price theoption using the formula (10).
Another difficulty with exponential Lรฉvy models is that closed-form expressions existfor their characteristic function while their density function is usually unknown. It is thusdifficult to find a closed-form formula of ๐ถp๐พq, and even not possible for some pricingmeasures and Lรฉvy processes. Nevertheless, the analytic expression of the characteristicfunction ฮฆห๐ก under the pricing measure Pห is known, one can use the fast Fourier transform(FFT) method developed by Carr & Madan [10] to numerically compute the option price.
Assume now that the characteristic function ฮฆ๐ก of p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s under P is analyticallyknown. The pricing procedure has two steps:
โ Choose an equivalent martingale measure Pห P ๐ซ under which we have an analyticexpression of the characteristic function, called ฮฆห๐ก .
โ Apply the FFT in ฮฆห๐ to compute the option price.
3 Equivalent martingale measureThe equivalent martingale measure method is one of the most powerful methods of optionpricing. The no-arbitrage assumption can be expressed by the existence of at least oneequivalent martingale measure. If the market is arbitrage-free and incomplete, thereare several equivalent martingale measures and we have to select, with respect to somecriteria, the most suitable one in order to price options.
Several candidates for an equivalent martingale measure are proposed in the literature.To construct them, two different approaches are employed:
โ Esscher transform method: The Esscher transform method is widely used in risktheory. It consists in applying an Esscher transform with respect to some riskprocess. This risk process can be the logarithmic return p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s in the case ofthe Esscher martingale measure [8, 21], the simple return p๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s in the case ofthe Minimal entropy martingale measure [18, 19, 33] or the continuous martingalepart p๐๐
๐ก q๐กPr0,๐ s of the Lรฉvy process p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s in the case of the mean correctingmartingale measure [42].
โ Minimal distance method: This method is more related to the maximization ofexpected utility and hedging problem. This includes the utility-based martingalemeasure [26], the minimal martingale measure [17] and the variance optimal mar-tingale measure [39].
3.1 Esscher martingale measure
The Esscher martingale measure is constructed by applying an Esscher transform withrespect to the process p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s. One of the greatest advantages is that p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s is stilla Lรฉvy process under this equivalent measure. Let us give the definition of the Esschertransform and the condition under which we obtain an equivalent martingale measure.
Definition 3.1. Let p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s be a Lรฉvy process on pฮฉ,โฑ , pโฑ๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s,Pq. We call Esschertransform with respect to p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s any change of P to an equivalent measure Pห by adensity process ๐๐ก โ
dPห
dP
ห
ห
โฑ๐กof the form:
๐๐ก โ๐๐๐๐ก
E r๐๐๐๐กs, (11)
where ๐ P R.
5
The Esscher density process ๐๐ก โdPห
dP
ห
ห
โฑ๐ก, which formally looks like the density of a
one-dimensional Esscher transform, leads to one-dimensional Esscher transforms of themarginal distributions, with the same parameter ๐:
Pหp๐๐ก P ๐ตq โ
ลผ
1๐ตp๐๐กq๐๐๐๐ก
Er๐๐๐๐กsdP โ
ลผ
1๐ตp๐ฅq๐๐๐ฅ
Er๐๐๐๐กsdP๐๐กpd๐ฅq,
for any set ๐ต P โฌpRq.One advantage of using p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s as a risk process is that the density process only
depends on the current stock price. In what follows, we give the condition for the existenceof the density process ๐๐ก โ
dPห
dP
ห
ห
โฑ๐กand the characteristic triplet of p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s under Pห in
such case.
Proposition 3.1. Let p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s be a Lรฉvy process on R with characteristic triplet p๐, ๐2, ๐qand let ๐ P R. The exponential moment Er๐๐๐๐กs is finite for some ๐ก or, equivalently, forall ๐ก ฤ 0 if and only if
ล
|๐ฅ|ฤ1๐๐๐ฅ๐pd๐ฅq ฤ 8. In this case,
Er๐๐๐๐กs โ ๐๐กฮจpยด๐๐q,
where ฮจ is the characteristic exponent of the Lรฉvy process defined by (4).
For a proof, see [38, Theorem 25.17].
Proposition 3.2. Let p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s be a Lรฉvy process on R with characteristic triplet p๐, ๐2, ๐qunder P. For all ๐ P R such that E
โ
๐๐๐1โฐ
ฤ 8,
(i) The process p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s given by (11) defines a density process.
(ii) The process p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s is a Lรฉvy process with triplet p๐ห, ๐2, ๐หq under Pห where
๐หpd๐ฅq โ ๐๐๐ฅ๐pd๐ฅq, for ๐ฅ P R,
and๐ห โ ๐` ๐2๐ `
ลผ
|๐ฅ|ฤ1
๐ฅ๐หpd๐ฅq ยด
ลผ
|๐ฅ|ฤ1
๐ฅ๐pd๐ฅq.
Proof. (i) Recall that Er๐๐๐๐กs โ ๐๐กฮจpยด๐๐q โ`
Er๐๐๐1sห๐ก. Then, ๐๐ก is integrable for all ๐ก.
Using the independence and stationary properties of the Lรฉvy process p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s, we havefor ๐ ฤ ๐ก,
Er๐๐ก|โฑ๐ s โ1
E r๐๐๐๐กsEr๐๐p๐๐กยด๐๐ `๐๐ q|โฑ๐ s โ
1
E r๐๐๐๐กsEr๐๐p๐๐กยด๐๐ q|โฑ๐ s Er๐๐๐๐ |โฑ๐ s
โ1
E r๐๐๐๐กsEr๐๐p๐๐กยด๐๐ qs ๐๐๐๐ โ
๐๐๐๐
E r๐๐๐๐ sโ ๐๐ .
Thus, p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s is a P-martingale.(ii) We prove that p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s is a Lรฉvy process under the probability measure Pห by
computing its characteristic function under Pห :
ฮฆหp๐ขq โ Eหr๐๐๐ข๐๐กs โ
ลผ
๐๐๐ข๐๐กdPห โลผ
๐๐๐ข๐๐ก๐๐๐๐ก
Er๐๐๐๐กsdP
โEr๐p๐`๐๐ขq๐๐กs
Er๐๐๐๐กsโ exp p๐ก pฮจpยด๐p๐ ` ๐๐ขqq ยดฮจpยด๐๐qqq .
6
Define ฮจหp๐ขq โ ฮจpยด๐p๐ ` ๐๐ขqq ยดฮจpยด๐๐q for ๐ข P R. Then,
ฮจหp๐ขq โ
ห
๐p๐ ` ๐๐ขq `๐2
2p๐ ` ๐๐ขq2 `
ลผ
R
`
๐p๐`๐๐ขq๐ฅ ยด 1ยด p๐ ` ๐๐ขq๐ฅ1|๐ฅ|ฤ1ห
๐pd๐ฅq
ห
ยด
ห
๐๐ `๐2
2๐2 `
ลผ
R
`
๐๐๐ฅ ยด 1ยด ๐๐ฅ1|๐ฅ|ฤ1ห
๐pd๐ฅq
ห
โ ๐p๐` ๐2๐q๐ขยด๐2
2๐ข2`
ลผ
R
`
๐๐๐ฅp๐๐๐ข๐ฅ ยด 1q ยด ๐๐ข๐ฅ1|๐ฅ|ฤ1ห
๐pd๐ฅq
โ ๐
ห
๐` ๐2๐ `
ลผ
|๐ฅ|ฤ1
p๐๐๐ฅ ยด 1q๐ฅ๐pd๐ฅq
ห
๐ขยด๐2
2๐ข2`
ลผ
R
`
๐๐๐ฅp๐๐๐ข๐ฅ ยด 1ยด ๐๐ข๐ฅ1|๐ฅ|ฤ1qห
๐pd๐ฅq.
By defining๐หp๐ฅq โ ๐๐๐ฅ๐p๐ฅq, for ๐ฅ P R
and๐ห โ ๐` ๐2๐ `
ลผ
|๐ฅ|ฤ1
๐ฅ๐หpd๐ฅq ยด
ลผ
|๐ฅ|ฤ1
๐ฅ๐pd๐ฅq,
we obtain a Lรฉvy-Khintchine representation for ฮฆห. Thus, p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s is a Lรฉvy processunder Pห with triplet p๐ห, ๐2, ๐หq.
To interpret the expression of ๐ห, let us remember that the jump measure ๐ can havea singularity at zero. Thus, there can be infinitely many small jumps and the character-istic function of their sum
ล
|๐ฅ|ฤ1p๐๐๐ข๐ฅ ยด 1q๐pd๐ฅq does not necessarily converge. To obtain
convergence, this jump integral was centered and replaced by its compensated version inthe Lรฉvy-Khintchine representation. We integrate this compensator
ล
|๐ฅ|ฤ1๐ฅ๐pd๐ฅq in the
drift. When we change the measure P to Pห, we must naturally truncate the compensatorof ๐ from the drift and add the one of ๐ห. We thus obtain ๐ห.
Theorem 3.1. Let p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s be a Lรฉvy process with triplet p๐, ๐2, ๐q under P. Supposethat ๐1 is non-degenerate and has a moment generating function ๐ข รร Erexpp๐ข๐1qs onsome open interval p๐1, ๐2q with ๐2 ยด ๐1 ฤ 1. Assume that there exists a real number๐ P p๐1, ๐2 ยด 1q such that
๐` ๐2๐ `๐2
2`
ลผ
R
`
๐๐๐ฅp๐๐ฅ ยด 1q ยด ๐ฅ1|๐ฅ|ฤ1ห
๐pd๐ฅq โ ๐, (12)
or equivalentlyEr๐p๐`1q๐๐กs โ ๐๐๐กEr๐๐๐๐กs, (13)
where ๐ is the risk-free interest rate. Then the real ๐ is unique and the equivalent mea-sure Pห given by the Esscher transform with respect to p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s
dPห
dP
ห
ห
ห
ห
โฑ๐ก
โ๐๐๐๐ก
E r๐๐๐๐กs
is an equivalent martingale measure.
Proof. Proposition 3.2 guarantees that p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s is a Lรฉvy process under all measures Pหgiven by an Esscher transform. By the independence and stationarity of increments of
7
p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s, the martingale property of p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s under Pห is implied by Eหr๐๐กs โ ๐0 for๐ก ฤ 0. From the definition of the Esscher measure transform,
Eหr๐๐กs โ Eหr๐0 ๐๐๐กยด๐๐กs โ Eโ
๐0 ๐๐๐กยด๐๐ก๐๐๐๐ก
Er๐๐๐๐กs
โ ๐0 ๐ยด๐๐กEr๐p๐`1q๐๐กs
Er๐๐๐๐กs. (14)
Thus, Eหr๐๐กs โ ๐0 if and only if there exists a real ๐ such that (13) holds. This real ๐must be in p๐1, ๐2ยด1q to ensure the existence of the moment generating function in ๐ and๐ ` 1.
Using Proposition 3.1, we rewrite (13) in terms of the characteristic exponent under P
ฮจpยด๐p๐ ` 1qq ยดฮจpยด๐๐q โ ๐.
We then develop the expression of ฮจ given by (4) and we obtain the condition (12). Thediscounted price p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s is a martingale under the equivalent measure given by theEsscher transform with ๐ (if it exists) solution to this equation (12).
3.2 Minimal Entropy martingale measure (MEMM)
The MEMM has been investigated in various settings by several authors [16, 17, 18,33, 39]. In particular, the MEMM for Exponential Lรฉvy process has been discussed in[11, 19, 23, 34]. It turns out that this measure can be obtained by applying an Esschertransform with respect to the simple return process p๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s. Furthermore, p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s
is still a Lรฉvy process under this measure. In this section, we recall the definition of therelative entropy and give the condition on the Esscher parameter for the existence of theMEMM, as well as the characteristic triplet of p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s under this measure.
Definition 3.2. Let ๐ข be a sub-๐-field of โฑ and Q a probability measure on ๐ข. Therelative entropy on ๐ข of Q with respect to P is defined by
H๐ขpQ|Pq :โ
$
โ
&
โ
%
ลผ
log
ห
dQdP
ห
ห
ห
ห
๐ข
ห
๐Q, if Q ! P on ๐ข,
`8, otherwise,(15)
where dQdP
ห
ห
๐ข stands for the Radon-Nikodym derivative of Q|๐ข with respect to P|๐ข.
Theorem 3.2. Let p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s be a Lรฉvy process with triplet p๐, ๐2, ๐q under P. Supposethat there exists a real number ๐ฝ P R such that
ลผ
๐ฅฤ 1
๐๐ฅ๐๐ฝp๐๐ฅยด1q๐pd๐ฅq ฤ 8 (16)
and๐` ๐2๐ฝ `
๐2
2`
ลผ
R
`
p๐๐ฅ ยด 1q๐๐ฝp๐๐ฅยด1q
ยด ๐ฅ1|๐ฅ|ฤ1ห
๐pd๐ฅq โ ๐, (17)
where ๐ is the risk-free interest rate. Then,
1. The real ๐ฝ is unique and the equivalent measure Qห given by the Esscher transformwith respect to p๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s,
dQห
dP
ห
ห
ห
ห
โฑ๐ก
โ๐๐ฝ๐ก
Eโ
๐๐ฝ๐ก
ฤฑ
is an equivalent martingale measure, where p๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s is given by (6).
8
2. The stochastic process p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s is still a Lรฉvy process under Qห with the followingcharacteristic triplet
ห
๐` ๐ฝ๐2`
ลผ
|๐ฅ|ฤ1
๐ฅ๐หpd๐ฅq ยด
ลผ
|๐ฅ|ฤ1
๐ฅ๐pd๐ฅq, ๐2, ๐Qห
ห
,
where๐Qห
pd๐ฅq โ ๐๐ฝp๐๐ฅยด1q๐pd๐ฅq.
3. The probability measure Qห attains the minimal entropy in ๐ซ
Hโฑ๐pQห|Pq โ min
QP๐ซHโฑ๐
pQ|Pq.
For a proof, see [19].Thus, the minimal entropy martingale measure can be simply expressed as an Esscher
transform with respect to the simple return process p๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s. Note that although wehave the characteristic triplet of the process p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s under Qห, the analytic expressionof the characteristic function under this equivalent martingale measure is often difficultto express and the pricing with the characteristic function is not possible in this case.
4 Pricing with characteristic functionWe consider here the problem of European call valuation of maturity ๐ . Various tech-niques have been applied to answer this question. For example, one can resort to MonteCarlo techniques to simulate sample paths for the asset. Averaging a sufficiently largenumber of realized payoffs then yields the required price, see for example [5, 22]. One canalso attempt to derive a partial differential equation for pricing which can be solved usingnumerical methods [41]. Yet another method is based on the Fourier analysis, which isthe subject of the current section.
Two methods based on the Fourier analysis exist in the literature. Both of them relyon the availability of the characteristic function of the stock price logarithm. Indeed, fora wide class of stock models characteristic functions have been obtained in a closed-formformula even if the risk-neutral densities (or probability mass function) themselves are notexplicitly available. Examples of Lรฉvy process characteristic functions have been derivedin [24, 30, 43].
The first of these Fourier methods is actually the application of the Gil-Palaez inversionformula in finance. This idea originates from [24]. However, singularities in the integrandprevent it to be an accurate method. The second, called the Carr-Madan method, wasfirst proposed by [10]. It ensures that the Fourier transform of the call price exists thanksto the inclusion of a damping factor. Moreover, the Fourier inversion can be accomplishedby the fast Fourier transform (FFT) in this case. The tremendous speed of the FFT allowsoption pricing for a huge number of strikes to be evaluated very rapidly. In this section,we illustrate the Carr-Madan method.
Let ๐๐ โ ๐0 expp๐๐ q be the terminal price of the underlying asset of a European callwith strike ๐พ, where p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s is a Lรฉvy process with triplet p๐, ๐2, ๐q. Denote by Pห theselected equivalent martingale measure and by ๐ห๐ (its analytic expression is unknown)the risk-neutral density of ๐๐ . The characteristic function of ๐๐ under Pห can be writtenas
ฮฆห๐ p๐ขq โ
ลผ
R๐๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ห๐ p๐ฅqd๐ฅ. (18)
9
Let ๐ โ logp๐พ๐0q be the logarithm of the normalized strike. The risk-neutral valuationunder Pห yields
๐ถp๐พq โ ๐ยด๐๐Eหrp๐๐ ยด๐พq`s
โ ๐0๐ยด๐๐Eหrp๐๐๐ ยด ๐๐q`s
โ ๐0๐ยด๐๐
ลผ 8
๐
p๐๐ฅ ยด ๐๐q๐ห๐ p๐ฅqd๐ฅ.
Define the function ๐0 by ๐0p๐q โ ๐ถp๐0๐๐q. The Fourier inversion technique consists
in the following assertion: ๐ถp๐พq โ ๐0p๐q and ๐0 โ FTยด1 หFTp๐0q where FT is the Fouriertransform operator. Since
lim๐รยด8
๐0p๐q โ lim๐พร0
๐ถp๐พq โ ๐0,
we see that ๐0 is not in ๐ฟ1, the space of integrable functions, as the limit of ๐0p๐q as ๐ goesto minus infinity is different from zero. For that, we cannot directly apply the Fourierinversion technique as the Fourier transform of ๐0p๐q does not converge. To get aroundthis problem of integrability, we consider the modified call price
๐๐ผp๐q โ ๐๐ผ๐๐0p๐q
where ๐ผ ฤ 0.In the next two propositions, we develop a closed-form formula for the Fourier trans-
form of ๐๐ผp๐q and obtain the option price ๐ถp๐พq by applying the inverse Fourier transformto the developed formula.
Proposition 4.1. Let ๐ผ ฤ 0 such that Eหr๐p๐ผ`1q๐๐ s ฤ 8. The Fourier transform of ๐๐ผp๐qis well defined and given by:
๐๐ผp๐ฃq โ๐0๐
ยด๐๐ฮฆห๐ p๐ฃ ยด p๐ผ ` 1q๐q
๐ผ2 ` ๐ผ ยด ๐ฃ2 ` ๐p2๐ผ ` 1q๐ฃ, @๐ฃ P R, (19)
where ฮฆห๐ is the characteristic function of ๐๐ under Pห.
Proof. Assume for the moment that ๐๐ผp๐ฃq is well defined. We have
๐๐ผp๐ฃq โ
ลผ 8
ยด8
๐๐๐ฃ๐๐๐ผp๐qd๐
โ
ลผ 8
ยด8
๐๐๐ฃ๐๐๐ผ๐๐ถp๐0๐๐qd๐
โ
ลผ 8
ยด8
๐๐๐ฃ๐๐๐ผ๐ห
๐0๐ยด๐๐
ลผ 8
๐
p๐๐ฅ ยด ๐๐q๐ห๐ p๐ฅqd๐ฅ
ห
d๐
โ ๐0๐ยด๐๐
ลผ 8
ยด8
๐ห๐ p๐ฅq
หลผ ๐ฅ
ยด8
๐p๐ผ`๐๐ฃq๐p๐๐ฅ ยด ๐๐qd๐
ห
d๐ฅ
โ ๐0๐ยด๐๐
ลผ 8
ยด8
๐ห๐ p๐ฅq
ห
๐๐ฅลผ ๐ฅ
ยด8
๐p๐ผ`๐๐ฃq๐d๐ ยด
ลผ ๐ฅ
ยด8
๐p๐ผ`1`๐๐ฃq๐d๐
ห
d๐ฅ
โ ๐0๐ยด๐๐
ลผ 8
ยด8
๐ห๐ p๐ฅq
ห
๐p๐ผ`1`๐๐ฃq๐ฅ
๐ผ ` ๐๐ฃยด
๐p๐ผ`1`๐๐ฃq๐ฅ
๐ผ ` 1` ๐๐ฃ
ห
d๐ฅ.
10
By substituting (18) here in, we obtain the expression (19).We now prove the existence of ๐๐ผp๐ฃq. First note that Eหr๐p๐ผ`1q๐๐ s ฤ 8 implies
๐๐ผp0q ฤ 8, (20)
since
๐๐ผp0q โ๐0๐
ยด๐๐ฮฆห๐ pยดp๐ผ ` 1q๐q
๐ผ2 ` ๐ผโ
๐0๐ยด๐๐Eหr๐p๐ผ`1q๐๐ s
๐ผ2 ` ๐ผ.
On the other hand, as ๐๐ผp๐q is positive, we have
|๐๐ผp๐ฃq| โ
ห
ห
ห
ห
ลผ 8
ยด8
๐๐๐ฃ๐๐๐ผp๐qd๐
ห
ห
ห
ห
ฤ
ลผ 8
ยด8
๐๐ผp๐qd๐ โ ๐๐ผp0q.
Combining this with (20) completes the proof.
Proposition 4.2. Let p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s be a Lรฉvy process with characteristic function ฮฆห underan equivalent martingale measure Pห. The option price is given by
๐ถp๐พq โ๐ยด๐ผ logp๐พ๐0q
๐Re
"ลผ 8
0
๐ยด๐๐ฃ logp๐พ๐0q๐๐ผp๐ฃqd๐ฃ
*
, (21)
where ๐๐ผ is given by (19).
Proof. The inverse Fourier transform gives us
๐๐ผp๐q โ1
2๐
ลผ
R๐ยด๐๐ฃ๐๐๐ผp๐ฃqd๐ฃ. (22)
Then,
๐ถp๐พq โ๐ยด๐ผ logp๐พ๐0q
2๐
ลผ
R๐ยด๐๐ฃ logp๐พ๐0q๐๐ผp๐ฃqd๐ฃ โ
๐ยด๐ผ logp๐พ๐0q
๐Re
"ลผ 8
0
๐ยด๐๐ฃ logp๐พ๐0q๐๐ผp๐ฃqd๐ฃ
*
,
(23)where the last equality follows from the observation that
ลผ
R๐ยด๐๐ฃ logp๐พ๐0q๐๐ผp๐ฃqd๐ฃ โ
ลผ 8
0
๐ยด๐๐ฃ logp๐พ๐0q๐๐ผp๐ฃqd๐ฃ `
ลผ 0
ยด8
๐ยด๐๐ฃ logp๐พ๐0q๐๐ผp๐ฃqd๐ฃ,
and where the second term on the right-hand side can be written asลผ 0
ยด8
๐ยด๐๐ฃ logp๐พ๐0q๐๐ผp๐ฃqd๐ฃ โ
ลผ 8
0
๐๐๐ข logp๐พ๐0q๐๐ผpยด๐ขqd๐ข โ
ลผ 8
0
๐ยด๐๐ข logp๐พ๐0q๐๐ผp๐ขqd๐ข
โ
ลผ 8
0
๐ยด๐๐ข logp๐พ๐0q๐๐ผp๐ขqd๐ข.
This concludes the proof.
We only have considered the pricing of vanilla calls. Obviously, one can obtain prices ofvanilla puts by using the put-call parity. The price ๐๐ p๐พq of a vanilla put can alternativelybe obtained with the Carr-Madan inversion by choosing a negative value for ๐ผ, see [29].
11
5 Discretization and FFTComputing the price of a call option ๐ถp๐พq โ ๐ยด๐๐Eหrp๐๐ ยด ๐พq`s under the pricingrule Pห requires the inversion of the Fourier transform in (22). In general, this will notbe analytically tractable. A numerical approach is necessary. In doing so we give aformulation to which we can apply the fast Fourier transform (FFT) [13, 40]. Here wedefine the discrete Fourier transform (DFT) as
๐น๐ข โ
๐รฟ
๐โ1
๐๐๐p๐ยด1qp๐ขยด1q๐ , ๐ข โ 1, . . . , ๐ (24)
where ๐๐ โ ๐ยด2๐๐๐ . The software R provides an efficient FFT-algorithm for this formula-
tion.We are interested in computing the integral
ลผ 8
0
๐ยด๐๐ฃ๐๐๐ผp๐ฃqd๐ฃ,
where ๐๐ผp๐ฃq is given by (19).For ๐๐p๐ฃq โ ๐ยด๐๐ฃ๐๐๐ผp๐ฃq, the trapezoidal rule yields
ลผ ๐ด
0
๐๐p๐ฃqd๐ฃ ยซโ๐ฃ
2
ยซ
๐๐p๐ฃ1q ` 2๐ยด1รฟ
๐โ2
๐๐p๐ฃ๐q ` ๐๐p๐ฃ๐q
ff
(25)
โ โ๐ฃ
ยซ
๐รฟ
๐โ1
๐๐p๐ฃ๐q ยด1
2r๐๐p๐ฃ1q ` ๐๐p๐ฃ๐qs
ff
, (26)
where ๐ด โ p๐ ยด1qโ๐ฃ. As we truncated the interval of integration, a truncation error willresult and we refer to [10] for discussions on this topic. Let
๐ฃ๐ โ p๐ยด 1qโ๐ฃ (27)
where ๐ โ 1, . . . , ๐. Furthermore, let
๐๐ข โ ๐1 ` p๐ขยด 1qโ๐, (28)
where ๐ข โ 1, . . . , ๐, be the grid in the ๐-domain. The constant ๐1 P R can be tuned suchthat the grid is laid around aimed strikes. If we are interested in options with particularstrikes around a value ๐พ, we take ๐1 โ logp๐พ๐0q ยด
๐2
โ๐ฃ. Substituting (27) and (28) in(26) yields
ลผ ๐ด
0
๐๐๐ขp๐ฃqd๐ฃ ยซ โ๐ฃ
ยซ
๐รฟ
๐โ1
๐ยด๐rp๐ยด1qฮ๐ฃsr๐1`p๐ขยด1qฮ๐s๐๐ผp๐ฃ๐q ยด1
2r๐๐๐ขp๐ฃ1q ` ๐๐๐ขp๐ฃ๐qs
ff
โ โ๐ฃ
ยซ
๐รฟ
๐โ1
๐ยด๐ฮ๐ฃฮ๐p๐ยด1qp๐ขยด1q๐๐1p๐ฃ๐q ยด1
2r๐๐๐ขp๐ฃ1q ` ๐๐๐ขp๐ฃ๐qs
ff
.
By setting
โ๐ฃ โ๐ โ2๐
๐,
12
we haveลผ ๐ด
0
๐๐๐ขp๐ฃqd๐ฃ ยซ โ๐ฃ
ยซ
๐รฟ
๐โ1
๐p๐ยด1qp๐ขยด1q๐ ๐๐1p๐ฃ๐q ยด
1
2r๐๐๐ขp๐ฃ1q ` ๐๐๐ขp๐ฃ๐qs
ff
. (29)
The above sum in (29) takes the form of (24) with ๐๐ โ ๐๐1p๐ฃ๐q. Hence FFT can beapplied to evaluate this sum. The final result for the Carr-Madan inversion is thus:
๐ถp๐0๐๐๐ขq ยซ
๐ยด๐ผ๐๐ข
๐Re
#
โ๐ฃ
ยซ
๐รฟ
๐โ1
๐p๐ยด1qp๐ขยด1q๐ ๐๐1p๐ฃ๐qs ยด
1
2r๐๐๐ขp๐ฃ1q ` ๐๐๐ขp๐ฃ๐qs
ff+
.
Instead of the trapezoidal rule, we can apply the more accurate Simpsonโs rule. Alongthe same lines as above, one can easily show that in this case we have
๐ถp๐0๐๐๐ขq ยซ
๐ยด๐ผ๐๐ข
๐Re
#
โ๐ฃ
3
ยซ
๐รฟ
๐โ1
๐p๐ยด1qp๐ขยด1q๐ ๐๐1p๐ฃ๐qp3` pยด1q๐ ยด ๐ฟ๐ยด1q
ยด r๐๐๐ขp๐ฃ๐ยด1q ` 4๐๐๐ขp๐ฃ๐qs
ff+
, (30)
where ๐ฟ๐ยด1 denotes the Kronecker delta function that equals 1 whenever ๐ โ 1.To apply the FFT algorithm, ๐ must be a power of 2. For that, we fix ๐ โ 4096 and
โ๐ฃ โ 0.25. This gives โ๐ โ 6.13 ยจ10ยด3. We are interested in strikes around at the money๐พ โ ๐0. We fix then ๐1 โ ยด
๐2
โ๐.
6 ApplicationsFinancial models with jumps fall into two categories. In the first category, called jump-diffusion models, the evolution of prices is given by a diffusion process, punctuated byjumps at random intervals. Here the jumps represent rare events as crashes and largedrawdowns. Such an evolution can be represented by modeling the log-price as a Lรฉvyprocess with a nonzero Gaussian component and a jump part, which is a compoundPoisson process with a finite number of jumps in every time interval. Examples of suchmodels are the Merton jumps diffusion model with Gaussian jumps [32] and the Koumodel with double exponential jumps [28]. In these models, the dynamical structure ofthe process is easy to understand and describe, since the distribution of jump sizes isknown. The second category consists of models with an infinite number of jumps in everytime interval, which called infinite activity models. In these models, one does not needto introduce a Brownian component since the dynamics of jumps is already rich enoughto generate a nontrivial small time behavior [9] and it has been argued [9, 20] that suchmodels give a more realistic description of the price process at various time scales. Inaddition, many models from this class can be constructed via Brownian subordinationwhich gives them additional analytic tractability compared to jump-diffusion models.Two important examples of this category are the variance gamma model [10, 30] andthe normal inverse Gaussian model [2, 3, 37]. However, since the real price process isobserved on a discrete grid, it is difficult, and even impossible, to empirically observeto which category the price process belongs. The choice becomes rather a question ofmodeling convenience than an empirical one. In this section, we start by recalling thestandard Black & Scholes model. Then, we apply the pricing method in a jump-diffusionexample, the Merton model. We end by the variance gamma model: an infinite activityexample. Unless otherwise stated, we use the parameters summarized in Table 1 fornumerical applications.
13
Market B&S Merton VG FFT
๐0 โ 100 ๐ โ 0.145 ๐พ โ 0.1 ๐พ โ 0.1 ๐ โ 4096
๐ โ 0.02 ๐ โ 0.3 ๐ โ 0.3 ๐ โ ยด0.01 โ๐ฃ โ 0.25
๐ โ 0.5 ๐ โ 1 ๐ฟ โ 1 โ๐ โ 2๐๐ฮ๐ฃ
๐ โ ยด0.1 ๐ โ 0.2 ๐1 โ ยด๐2
โ๐
๐ฟ โ 0.2
Table 1: Summary of numerical values of different parameters used in Section 6.
6.1 Black & Scholes model
The Black & Scholes model, proposed by [7], is one of the most popular models in finance.The price process p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s is solution to the SDE
๐๐๐ก โ ๐๐๐ก๐๐ก` ๐๐๐ก๐๐ต๐ก; ๐0 ฤ 0, (31)
where ๐ P R, ๐ ฤ 0 and p๐ต๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s is a standard Brownian motion. By applying Itรดโsformula, we re-write p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s as an exponential Lรฉvy process (2) where
๐๐ก โ
ห
๐ยด๐2
2
ห
๐ก` ๐๐ต๐ก, (32)
for ๐ก P r0, ๐ s. The process p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s is a Lรฉvy process with tripletยด
๐ยด ๐2
2, ๐2, 0
ยฏ
. In fact,
for each ๐ก P r0, ๐ s, as ๐๐ก follows a Gaussian distribution ๐ฉ pp๐ยด ๐2
2q๐ก, ๐2๐กq, its characteristic
function is given by
ฮฆ๐กp๐ขq โ Er๐๐๐ข๐๐กs โ exp
ห
๐ก
ห
๐
ห
๐ยด๐2
2
ห
๐ขยด๐2
2๐ข2
หห
.
In this model, the price process does not have jumps. So, we are here in the completemarket case where there is only one equivalent martingale measure.
Esscher martingale measure. The exponential moment Er๐๐๐1s is finite for all ๐ P R.To prove the existence of the Esscher martingale measure Pห, we look for a real ๐ P Rsolution to
ห
๐ยด๐2
2
ห
` ๐2๐ `๐2
2โ ๐. (33)
The solution is given by ๐ โ p๐ ยด ๐q๐2 and the measure Pห defined by the Esschertransform with respect to p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s and with the parameter ๐ is the unique equivalentmartingale measure. The process p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s is again a Lรฉvy process under Pห with tripletp๐ ยด ๐2
2, ๐, 0q.
This means that p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s can be written as
๐๐ก โ
ห
๐ ยด๐2
2
ห
๐ก` ๐๐๐ก,
where p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s given by ๐๐ก โ ๐ต๐ก`๐ยด๐๐
๐ก is a standard Brownian motion under Pห. Thediscounted price
๐๐ก โ ๐0 ๐๐๐๐กยด๐2
2๐ก
14
solves the equation๐๐๐ก โ ๐๐ก๐๐๐ก; ๐0 ฤ 0.
We found the same context of Black & Scholes modeling and the Girsanov theorem formeasure changes.
Pricing with FFT. For a Black & Scholes model with parameters corresponding tothe values in Table 1, the Esscher parameter that gives the Esscher martingale measureis ๐ โ p๐ ยด ๐q๐2 โ ยด1.39. The numerical computation of the call price is presented inFigure 2 with respect to the strike ๐พ. We see that the option price approaches ๐0 as๐พ ร 0 and goes to 0 as ๐พ ร `8.
Otherwise, we have compared the closed-form price of Black & Scholes with the optionprice given by the Carr-Madan method. The absolute error of the numerical method isof order 6 ยจ 10ยด7 whatever the strike is.
6.2 Merton model
This model is proposed by [32]. The price is described by an exponential Lรฉvy process (2)where
๐๐ก โ ๐พ๐ก` ๐๐ต๐ก `
๐๐กรฟ
๐โ1
๐๐, (34)
with ๐พ P R, p๐ต๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s is a standard Brownian motion, p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s is a Poisson process withintensity ๐ and p๐๐q๐ฤ1 are i.i.d. Gaussian random variables with parameters ๐ and ๐ฟ2.For each 0 ฤ ๐ก ฤ ๐ , the characteristic function of ๐ is given by
ฮฆ๐กp๐ขq โ Er๐๐๐ข๐๐กs โ ๐๐กฮจp๐ขq,
andฮจp๐ขq โ ๐๐พ๐ขยด
๐2
2๐ข2` ๐
ห
exp
ห
๐๐๐ขยด๐ฟ2
2๐ข2
ห
ยด 1
ห
.
Define๐p๐ฅq โ ๐ห
1?
2๐๐ฟexp
ห
ยดp๐ฅยด๐q2
2๐ฟ2
ห
, ๐ฅ P R
and๐ โ ๐พ `
ลผ
|๐ฅ|ฤ1
๐ฅ ๐pd๐ฅq.
Then, ฮจ can be written on the form
ฮจp๐ขq โ ๐๐พ๐ขยด๐2
2๐ข2`
ลผ
R
`
๐๐๐ข๐ฅ ยด 1ห
๐pd๐ฅq
โ ๐๐๐ขยด๐2
2๐ข2`
ลผ
R
`
๐๐๐ข๐ฅ ยด 1ยด ๐๐ข๐ฅ1|๐ฅ|ฤ1ห
๐pd๐ฅq.
We conclude that, under P, p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s is a Lรฉvy process with triplet p๐, ๐2, ๐q. Withthis model, the market is incomplete. The compound Poisson process makes the riskuncontrolled and there exists an infinity of equivalent martingale measures.
15
Esscher martingale measure. The exponential moment Er๐๐๐1s is finite for all ๐ P R.To prove the existence of the Esscher martingale measure Pห, we look for a real ๐ P Rsolution to
๐พ ` ๐2๐ `๐2
2`
ลผ
R๐๐๐ฅ p๐๐ฅ ยด 1q ๐pd๐ฅq โ ๐,
or farther๐พ ` ๐2๐ `
๐2
2` ๐
ยด
๐๐p๐`1q`๐ฟ2
2p๐`1q2
ยด ๐๐๐` ๐ฟ2
2๐2ยฏ
โ ๐.
For numerical application with the parameters given in Table 1, we obtain ๐ ยซ ยด0.352.The characteristic function of p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s under Pห is given by
ฮฆห๐ก p๐ขq โ ๐๐กฮจหp๐ขq,
whereฮจหp๐ขq โ ๐p๐พ ` ๐2๐q๐ข`
๐2
2๐ข2` ๐
ยด
๐๐p๐`๐๐ขq`๐ฟ2
2p๐`๐๐ขq2
ยด ๐๐๐` ๐ฟ2
2๐2ยฏ
.
We conclude that, with the Esscher martingale measure, we are able to provide analyticexpression of the characteristic function under an equivalent martingale measure. Thisanalytic form will be numerically inverted with the fast Fourier transform later to providethe option price.
Using Proposition 2.1, the process p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s is a Lรฉvy process under Pห with tripletp๐ห, ๐2, ๐หq defined by
๐ห โ ๐พ ` ๐2๐ `
ลผ
|๐ฅ|ฤ1
๐ฅ๐หpd๐ฅq
and๐หp๐ฅq โ ๐๐๐ฅ๐p๐ฅq โ ๐ห ห
1?
2๐๐ฟexp p๐ฅยด p๐` ๐ฟ2๐qq2p2๐ฟ2q,
where ๐ห โ ๐ expp๐๐ ` ๐ฟ2๐2
2q. Hence, the Esscher martingale model p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s is once
again a jump diffusion with compound Poisson jumps:
๐๐ก โ p๐พ ` ๐2๐q๐ก` ๐๐๐ก `
๐ห๐ก
รฟ
๐โ1
๐ ห๐ ,
where p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s is a Pห-standard Brownian motion, p๐ห๐ก q๐กPr0,๐ s is a Pห-Poisson process
with intensity ๐ห and p๐ ห๐ q๐ฤ1 are i.i.d. Gaussian random variables with parameters ๐`๐ฟ2๐and ๐ฟ2.
Minimal entropy martingale measure. The existence of the minimal entropy mar-tingale measure Qห is equivalent to the existence of a real ๐ฝ solution to
๐พ ` ๐2๐ฝ `๐2
2`
ลผ
R
`
p๐๐ฅ ยด 1q๐๐ฝp๐๐ฅยด1q
ห
๐pd๐ฅq โ ๐,
in the Merton model framework. With the same parameters of Table 1, we get numerically๐ฝ ยซ ยด0.365.
Using Theorem 3.2, p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s is a Lรฉvy process under Qห with triplet p๐Qห
, ๐2, ๐Qห
q
defined by
๐Qห
โ ๐พ ` ๐ฝ๐2`
ลผ
|๐ฅ|ฤ1
๐ฅ๐Qห
pd๐ฅq
16
and๐Qห
p๐ฅq โ ๐๐ฝp๐๐ฅยด1q๐p๐ฅq โ ๐Qห
๐Qห
p๐ฅq
where ๐Qห
โล
๐Qห
pd๐ฅq is the intensity of the Qห-Poisson process and ๐Qห
p๐ฅq โ ๐Qหp๐ฅq
ล
๐Qหpd๐ฅq
is the jump size density under Qห.The role of the damping factor ๐๐๐ฅ in the case of the Esscher martingale measure Pห
and the dumping factor ๐๐ฝp๐๐ฅยด1q in the case of the minimal entropy martingale measure
Qห is to mitigate the general trend of the log price. In the Merton model, the generaltrend is given by Er๐๐กs โ p๐พ ` ๐๐q๐ก. A positive expectation slope of the log price leadsto a negative parameters ๐ and ๐ฝ which permit to give more weight to negative jumpsand less weight to positive jumps in the Lรฉvy densities ๐ห and ๐Qห , to rebalance themarket in the risk-neutral world and to have the martingale property. Conversely, if thelog price expectation is negative, the dumping factors will strongly reduce the left tail ofthe risk-neutral Lรฉvy densities.
The initial Lรฉvy density ๐ and the two risk-neutral Lรฉvy densities ๐ห and ๐Qห , as wellas the corresponding jump densities, are depicted in Figure 1 for different values of thelog price expectation. We vary the jump size expectation ๐ โ tยด0.1,ยด0.3, 0.3u to havedifferent signs of Er๐๐กs and therefore different signs of ๐ and ๐ฝ. The remaining parametersof the model are the ones given in Table 1. Depending on the Esscher parameter sign, wehave a dumping of the right tail or the left tail of the risk-neutral Lรฉvy density. Despitethis dumping effect in the Lรฉvy densities, we observe in the right hand figures that thejump size densities are not affected by this change of measures and the main effect is thenan increase or decrease in the jump intensities ๐ห and ๐Qห .
On the other hand, when we compare ๐ห to ๐Qห , we find that both functions arealmost equal with variations that do not exceed 1.6 ห 10ยด2. We can explain this by thefact that ๐ and represent respectively the compound and the simple returns of thestock price. So, we consider models with small jump ๐ฅ for which ๐๐ฅ ยด 1 ยซ ๐ฅ. Thus, theEsscher martingale measure and the minimal entropy martingale measure are almost thesame.
While we have the triplet of p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s under the minimal entropy martingale mea-sure, we still do not have an analytic expression of the characteristic function under thismeasure. For that, using the FFT to compute option prices under the minimal entropymartingale measure will be not possible.
Pricing with FFT under the Esscher martingale measure. In Figure 2, we com-pare the option price under a Black & Scholes model and a Merton model having thesame expectation of p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s. We choose models parameters such that ๐ยด ๐2
2โ ๐พ`๐๐.
The numerical computation of the call price is presented in Figure 2 with respect to thestrike ๐พ. As the Merton model allows bigger negative jumps, the probability to finishin-the-money is smaller. Otherwise, the option price can always be written
๐ถp๐พq โ ๐0ฮ 1 ยด๐พ๐ยด๐๐Pp๐๐ ฤ ๐พq,
where ฮ 1 is the delta of the option. The call price is thus greater around the money inthe Merton model.
Option price sensivity to jumps. To discuss the effects of jumps on the option price,we compare the results of the Merton model with respect to the jump intensity. Recallthat the B&S and Merton models are exponential Lรฉvy models with triplets p๐ยด ๐2
2, ๐2, 0q
17
and p๐พ `ล
|๐ฅ|ฤ1๐ฅ๐pd๐ฅq, ๐2, ๐q respectively, where
๐p๐ฅq โ ๐ห1
?2๐๐ฟ
exp`
p๐ฅยด๐q2p2๐ฟ2qห
.
Then, a B&S model is a Merton model with particular parameters ๐พ โ ๐ ยด ๐2
2et
๐ โ 0. This model does not contain jumps as the jump intensity ๐ โ 0. To see the effectof jumps on the option prices, we fix parameters such that ๐พ โ ๐ ยด ๐2
2and compare the
B&S model to Merton models with different jump intensities. We take the parameters ofTable 1 except for ๐ that varies in t2, 4, 6u. Note that this choice of parameters respectsthe condition ๐พ โ ๐ ยด ๐2
2. The different option prices are presented in Figure 3. For
all models, the option price approaches ๐0 as ๐พ ร 0 and goes to 0 as ๐พ ร `8. Thejump intensity modifies the option price only for strikes around at-the-money. Otherwise,as the intensity increases, we have more jumps in the period r0, ๐ s and the varianceVarp๐๐กq โ p๐
2 ` ๐p๐2 ` ๐ฟ2qq ๐ก increases. Consequently, the option price increases becauseof greater risk that jumps brings to the seller. The same observation is found when thejump size volatility increases. We present it in Figure 5. The price with respect tothe jump size mean is given by Figure 4. With a negative average of jumps size in theasset price, we have interesting out-the-money options, while in-the-money options is lessinteresting. A positive average of jumps size leads to reverse statement
6.3 Variance gamma model
The variance gamma process is proposed by [31] to describe stock price dynamics isteadof the Brownian motion in the original Black & Scholes model. Two new parameters: ๐skewness and ๐ kurtosis are introduced in order to describe asymmetry and fat tails ofreal life distributions. A variance gamma process is obtained by evaluating a Brownianmotion with a drift at a random time given by a gamma process.
Definition 6.1. The variance gamma (VG) process p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s with parameters p๐, ๐ฟ, ๐ qis defined as
๐๐ก โ ๐๐พ๐ก ` ๐ฟ๐ต๐พ๐ก ,
where p๐ต๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s is a standard Brownian motion and p๐พ๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s is a gamma process withunit mean rate and variance rate ๐ .
Proposition 6.1. The VG process p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s is a Lรฉvy process with characteristic func-tion ฮฆ๐ก and characteristic triplet p
ล
|๐ฅ|ฤ1๐ฅ๐pd๐ฅq, 0, ๐q where
Er๐๐๐ข๐๐กs โ
ห
1
1ยด ๐๐๐ ๐ข` p๐ฟ2๐ 2q๐ข2
ห๐ก๐
and
๐p๐ฅq โ1
๐ |๐ฅ|exp
ยจ
ห
๐
๐ฟ2๐ฅยด
b
๐2
๐ฟ2` 2
๐
๐ฟ|๐ฅ|
ห
โ.
From the expression of ๐, there exists infinitely small jumps. Such a process is calledan infinite activity process. It does not admit a distribution of jump size since jumpshappen infinitely.
18
To describe the stock price, we just add a drift component to the VG process. ABrownian component is not necessary and the process moves essentially by jumps. Theprice process is defined by an exponential Lรฉvy model (2) where
๐๐ก โ ๐พ๐ก` ๐๐ก.
The process p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s is a Lรฉvy process with characteristic tripletยด
๐พ `ล
|๐ฅ|ฤ1๐ฅ๐pd๐ฅq, 0, ๐
ยฏ
and characteristic ffunction given by
ฮฆ๐กp๐ขq โ Er๐๐๐ข๐๐กs โ๐๐๐พ๐ข๐ก
p1ยด ๐๐๐ ๐ข` p๐ฟ2๐ 2q๐ข2q๐ก๐
.
Esscher martingale measure. By solving the inequality 1 ยด ๐๐๐ ๐ข ` p๐ฟ2๐ 2q๐ข2 ฤ 0with respect to ๐ข, we show that ๐๐ก for some ๐ก or, equivalently, for all ๐ก, possesses a momentgenerating function ๐ข รร Erexpp๐ข๐๐กqs on
ยด
ยด๐๐ฟ2 ยดa
๐2๐ฟ2 ` 2๐ ๐ฟ,ยด๐๐ฟ2 `a
๐2๐ฟ2 ` 2๐ ๐ฟยฏ
.
To apply Theorem 3.1, we assume that 2a
๐2๐ฟ2 ` 2๐ ๐ฟ ฤ 1. Under this assumption,we look for ๐ P
ยด
ยด๐๐ฟ2 ยดa
๐2๐ฟ2 ` 2๐ ๐ฟ,ยด๐๐ฟ2 `a
๐2๐ฟ2 ` 2๐ ๐ฟ ยด 1ยฏ
solution to
Eโ
๐p๐`1q๐๐กโฐ
โ ๐๐๐กEโ
๐๐๐๐กโฐ
.
For the parameters given in Table 1, the moment generating function of ๐๐ก is welldefined on pยด3.15, 3.17q. Numerically, we obtain ๐ โ ยด0.57.
The characteristic function of p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s under Pห is given by
ฮฆห๐ก p๐ขq โEr๐p๐`๐๐ขq๐๐กs
Er๐๐๐๐กsโ
๐๐๐พ๐ข๐ก`
1ยด ๐๐ห๐ ๐ข` p๐ฟห2๐ 2q๐ข2ห๐ก๐
,
where ๐ห โ p๐` ๐ฟ2๐q๐ด, ๐ฟห โ ๐ฟ?๐ด and ๐ด โ 1ยด๐๐ ๐ยด ๐ฟ2๐
2๐2. Hence, p๐๐กq๐กPr0,๐ s is once
again a variance gamma process under Pห with characteristic tripletยด
๐พ `ล
|๐ฅ|ฤ1๐ฅ๐หpd๐ฅq, 0, ๐ห
ยฏ
where
๐หp๐ฅq โ ๐๐๐ฅ๐p๐ฅq โ1
๐ |๐ฅ|exp
ยจ
ห
๐ห
๐ฟห2๐ฅยด
b
๐ห2
๐ฟห2 `2๐
๐ฟห|๐ฅ|
ห
โ.
The initial Lรฉvy density and the risk-neutral Lรฉvy density are given in Figure 6. Withour choice of parameters, the general trend Er๐๐กs โ p๐พ `๐q๐ก is positive, which leads toa negative ๐. The large positive jumps will be nearly irrelevant for pricing options, whilelarge negative jumps will still contribute.
Pricing with FFT under the Esscher martingale measure. The explicit form ofthe characteristic function under the Esscher martingale measure Pห is applied to pricecall options. Figures 7 and 8 represent the sensivity of the call price to a variation ofthe parameters ๐ฟ and ๐ respectively. We take the parameters of Table 1 except for ๐ฟthat varies in t0.6, 0.8, 1u in Figure 7 and ๐ that varies in t0.02, 0.2u in Figure 8. Theparameters ๐ฟ and ๐ provide control over volatility and kurtosis respectively. Increasing ๐ฟleads to greater volatility which in turn increases the option price. In the other hand,when ๐ inscreases, the distribution tails of the asset price become fatter and the price ofthe out-the-money call increases, while the price of the at-the-money option decreases.
19
7 ConclusionIn this survey, we studied step by step how to price European option under an Exponen-tial Lรฉvy model. We used the Esscher transform technique to construct two equivalentmartingale measures: the Esscher martingale measure and the minimal entropy martin-gale measure. From the observation that the compound return and the simple return of astock price process are very close, we showed that these two measures are almost similar.However, the minimal entropy martingale measure is not adequate to the Carr-Madanpricing method as the characteristic function under this latter does not have an analyticexpression, even in simple models. Under the Esscher martingale measure, we numericallycomputed the price of European option using the Carr-Madan method based on the fastFourier transform. Numerical error of the Carr-Madan method is shown with comparisonto the closed-form formula in the Black & Scholes context. Moreover, the sensivity ofoption price to jumps is presented in the Merton model and the variance gamma modelwith respect to jump parameters.
References[1] David Applebaum. Lรฉvy processes and stochastic calculus. Cambridge University
Press, 2009.
[2] Ole E Barndorff-Nielsen. Normal inverse Gaussian distributions and stochasticvolatility modelling. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 24(1):1โ13, 1997.
[3] Ole E Barndorff-Nielsen. Processes of normal inverse Gaussian type. Finance andStochastics, 2(1):41โ68, 1997.
[4] David S Bates. Post-crash moneyness biases in S&P 500 futures options. Rod-ney, L. White Center working paper, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania,Philadelpia, PA, 1995.
[5] Fred Espen Benth, Martin Groth, and Paul C Kettler. A quasi-Monte Carlo algorithmfor the normal inverse Gaussian distribution and valuation of financial derivatives.International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance, 9(06):843โ867, 2006.
[6] Jean Bertoin. Lรฉvy processes, volume 121. Cambridge University Press, 1998.
[7] Fischer Black and Myron Scholes. The pricing of options and corporate liabilities.Journal of Political Economy, 81(3):637โ654, 1973.
[8] Hans Bรผhlmann, Freddy Delbaen, Paul Embrechts, and Albert N Shiryaev. No-arbitrage, change of measure and conditional Esscher transforms. CWI quarterly,9(4):291โ317, 1996.
[9] Peter Carr, Hรฉlyette Geman, Dilip Madan, and Marc Yor. The fine structure of assetreturns: An empirical investigation. The Journal of Business, 75(2):305โ333, 2002.
[10] Peter Carr and Dilip Madan. Option valuation using the fast Fourier transform.Journal of Computational Finance, 2(4):61โ73, 1999.
[11] Terence Chan. Pricing contingent claims on stocks driven by Lรฉvy processes. Annalsof Applied Probability, 9(2):504โ528, 1999.
20
[12] Rama Cont and Peter Tankov. Financial modelling with jump processes. Chapman &Hall/CRC Financial Mathematics Series. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton (Fla.),London, New York, 2004.
[13] James W Cooley and John W Tukey. An algorithm for the machine calculation ofcomplex Fourier series. Mathematics of Computation, 19(90):297โ301, 1965.
[14] Ernst Eberlein and Ulrich Keller. Hyperbolic distributions in finance. Bernoulli,1(3):281โ299, 1995.
[15] Ernst Eberlein, Ulrich Keller, and Karsten Prause. New insights into smile, mispric-ing, and Value-at-Risk: The hyperbolic model. The Journal of Business, 71(3):371โ405, 1998.
[16] Robert J Elliott, Leunglung Chan, and Tak Kuen Siu. Option pricing and Esschertransform under regime switching. Annals of Finance, 1(4):423โ432, 2005.
[17] Hans Follmer and Martin Schweizer. Hedging of contingent claims. Applied StochasticAnalysis, 5:389, 1991.
[18] Marco Frittelli. The minimal entropy martingale measure and the valuation problemin incomplete markets. Mathematical Finance, 10(1):39โ52, 2000.
[19] Tsukasa Fujiwara and Yoshio Miyahara. The minimal entropy martingale measuresfor geometric Lรฉvy processes. Finance and Stochastics, 7(4):509โ531, 2003.
[20] Hรฉlyette Geman. Pure jump Lรฉvy processes for asset price modelling. Journal ofBanking & Finance, 26(7):1297โ1316, 2002.
[21] Hans-Ulrich Gerber and Elias S W Shiu. Option pricing by Esscher transforms.Transactions of the Society of Actuaries, XLVI:99โ191, 1994.
[22] Paul Glasserman. Monte Carlo methods in financial engineering, volume 53. SpringerScience & Business Media, 2003.
[23] Thomas Goll and Ludger Rรผschendorf. Minimax and minimal distance martingalemeasures and their relationship to portfolio optimization. Finance and Stochastics,5(4):557โ581, 2001.
[24] Steven L Heston. A closed-form solution for options with stochastic volatility withapplications to bond and currency options. Review of Financial Studies, 6(2):327โ343, 1993.
[25] Friedrich Hubalek and Carlo Sgarra. Esscher transforms and the minimal entropymartingale measure for exponential Lรฉvy models. Quantitative Finance, 6(2):125โ145, 2006.
[26] Julien Hugonnier, Dmitry Kramkov, and Walter Schachermayer. On utility-basedpricing of contingent claims in incomplete markets. Mathematical Finance, 15(2):203โ212, 2005.
[27] Jean Jacod and Albert Shiryaev. Limit theorems for stochastic processes, volume288. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013.
21
[28] Steven G Kou. A jump-diffusion model for option pricing. Management Science,48(8):1086โ1101, 2002.
[29] Roger W Lee et al. Option pricing by transform methods: extensions, unificationand error control. Journal of Computational Finance, 7(3):51โ86, 2004.
[30] Dilip Madan, Peter Carr, and Eric Chang. The variance gamma process and optionpricing. European Finance Review, 2(1):79โ105, 1998.
[31] Dilip Madan and Eugene Seneta. The variance gamma (V.G.) model for share marketreturns. The Journal of Business, 63(4):511โ524, 1990.
[32] Robert C Merton. Option pricing when underlying stock returns are discontinuous.Journal of Financial Economics, 3(1-2):125โ144, 1976.
[33] Yoshio Miyahara. Canonical martingale measures of incomplete assets markets. Prob-ability Theory and Mathematical Statistics (Tokyo, 1995), pages 343โ352, 1996.
[34] Yoshio Miyahara. [Geometric Lรฉvy Process & MEMM] pricing model and relatedestimation problems. Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, 8(1):45โ60, 2001.
[35] Mark Rubinstein. Nonparametric tests of alternative option pricing models using allreported trades and quotes on the 30 most active CBOE option classes from august23, 1976 through august 31, 1978. The Journal of Finance, 40(2):455โ480, 1985.
[36] Mark Rubinstein. Implied binomial trees. The Journal of Finance, 49(3):771โ818,1994.
[37] Tina Hviid Rydberg. The normal inverse Gaussian Lรฉvy process: simulation and ap-proximation. Communications in Statistics. Stochastic Models, 13(4):887โ910, 1997.
[38] Ken-iti Sato. Lรฉvy processes and infinitely divisible distributions. Cambridge Univer-sity Press, 1999.
[39] Martin Schweizer. On the minimal martingale measure and the Fรถllmer-Schweizerdecomposition. Stochastic Analysis and Applications, 13(5):573โ599, 1995.
[40] James S Walker. Fast Fourier transforms, volume 24. CRC press, 1996.
[41] P Wilmott. Derivatives, the theory and practice of financial engineering. JohnWiley&Sons, Chichester, 1998.
[42] Luogen Yao, Gang Yang, and Xiangqun Yang. A note on the mean correcting martin-gale measure for geometric Lรฉvy processes. Applied Mathematics Letters, 24(5):593โ597, 2011.
[43] Jianwei Zhu. Modular Pricing of Options (MPO). In Modular Pricing of Options:An Application of Fourier Analysis, pages 25โ97. Springer, 2000.
22
ฮฝ(x)ฮฝโ(x)ฮฝQ
โ(x)
ฮธ โ โ0.35
ฮฒ โ โ0.37
-1.0 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
00.
51
1.5
2
(a) ๐ โ ยด0.1
Jump density of ฮฝ(x)Jump density of ฮฝโ(x)Jump density of ฮฝQ
โ(x)
ฮปโ โ 1.04
ฮปQโ โ 1.03
-1.0 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
00.
51
1.5
2
(b) ๐ โ ยด0.1
ฮฝ(x)ฮฝโ(x)ฮฝQ
โ(x)
ฮธ โ 0.67
ฮฒ โ 0.73
-1.0 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
00.
51
1.5
2
(c) ๐ โ ยด0.3
Jump density of ฮฝ(x)Jump density of ฮฝโ(x)Jump density of ฮฝQ
โ(x)
ฮปโ โ 0.83
ฮปQโ โ 0.84
-1.0 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
00.
51
1.5
2
(d) ๐ โ ยด0.3
ฮฝ(x)ฮฝโ(x)ฮฝQ
โ(x)
ฮธ โ โ2.73
ฮฒ โ โ2.53
-1.0 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
00.
51
1.5
2
(e) ๐ โ 0.3
Jump density of ฮฝ(x)Jump density of ฮฝโ(x)Jump density of ฮฝQ
โ(x)
ฮปโ โ 0.51
ฮปQโ โ 0.48
-1.0 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
00.
51
1.5
2
(f) ๐ โ 0.3
Figure 1: Lรฉvy densities and jump size densities under the historical measure, the Esschermartingale measure and the minimal entropy martingale measure in the Merton model.23
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
020
4060
8010
0
Strike K
Opt
ion
pric
eC(K
)
B&S : ยต = 0.145, ฯ = 0.3Merton : ฮณ = 0.2, ฯ = 0.3, ฮป = 1,m = โ0.1, ฮด = 0.2
Figure 2: Option price with respect to the strike ๐พ. A comparison between a B&S modeland a Merton model with the same expectation ๐ยด ๐22 โ ๐พ ` ๐๐.
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
020
4060
8010
0
Strike K
Opt
ion
pric
eC(K
)
ฮป = 0ฮป = 2ฮป = 4ฮป = 6
Figure 3: Call price sensivity to the jump intensity in Merton model.
24
80 100 120 140 160
05
1015
2025
Strike K
Opt
ion
pric
eC(K
)
m = โ0.1m = โ0.3m = 0.3
Figure 4: Call price sensivity to jump size mean in Merton in model.
80 100 120 140 160
05
1015
2025
Strike K
Opt
ion
pric
eC(K
)
ฮด = 0.1ฮด = 0.2ฮด = 0.4
Figure 5: Call price sensivity to jump size variance in Merton model.
25
020
4060
80
ฮฝโ(x)ฮฝ(x)
-0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
Figure 6: The risk neutral Lรฉvy density ๐หp๐ฅq of the Esscher martingale measure in thevariance gamma model, compared to the initial Lรฉvy density ๐p๐ฅq.
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
020
4060
8010
0
Strike K
opti
onpr
iceC(K
)
ฮด = 0.6ฮด = 0.8ฮด = 1
Figure 7: Call price sensivity to the volatility parameter in variance gamma model.
26
Strike K
Opt
ion
pric
eC(K
)
80 120 160 200 240 280
510
1520
2530
3540
ฮบ = 0.2ฮบ = 0.02
Figure 8: Call price sensivity to the kurtosis parameter in variance gamma model.
27