a new philosophy of religion? ivan strenski iahr, toronto, 16 august 2010
DESCRIPTION
A New Philosophy of Religion? Ivan Strenski IAHR, Toronto, 16 August 2010. Philosophy of (Lived) Religion. “Philosophy of Religion” ‘ philosophy’ AND ‘religion’. Both terms need to be unpacked, scrutinized, fleshed out. . Neither term can be left unanalyzed. . “philosophy”. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: A New Philosophy of Religion? Ivan Strenski IAHR, Toronto, 16 August 2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062812/568163c8550346895dd4ff4f/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
A New Philosophy of Religion?Ivan Strenski
IAHR, Toronto, 16 August 2010
![Page 2: A New Philosophy of Religion? Ivan Strenski IAHR, Toronto, 16 August 2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062812/568163c8550346895dd4ff4f/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Philosophy of (Lived) Religion
![Page 3: A New Philosophy of Religion? Ivan Strenski IAHR, Toronto, 16 August 2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062812/568163c8550346895dd4ff4f/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
“Philosophy of Religion”
‘philosophy’ AND ‘religion’
• Both terms need to be unpacked, scrutinized, fleshed out.
• Neither term can be left unanalyzed.
![Page 4: A New Philosophy of Religion? Ivan Strenski IAHR, Toronto, 16 August 2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062812/568163c8550346895dd4ff4f/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
“philosophy”
By ‘philosophy, ’ I mean ‘analytic philosophy’
Constructive philosophy and theologies are put on hold.
![Page 5: A New Philosophy of Religion? Ivan Strenski IAHR, Toronto, 16 August 2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062812/568163c8550346895dd4ff4f/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
“Religion” has taken its cues, in large part, from this guy
![Page 6: A New Philosophy of Religion? Ivan Strenski IAHR, Toronto, 16 August 2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062812/568163c8550346895dd4ff4f/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Thus, for classic analytic philosophy,
‘religion’ =• ‘Beliefs’, ‘doctrines’; • Moral imperatives;• ‘Theologies’; • Arguments; • = “Cognitivism”• Internal and Private
![Page 7: A New Philosophy of Religion? Ivan Strenski IAHR, Toronto, 16 August 2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062812/568163c8550346895dd4ff4f/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Classic analytic philosophy of religion presumes that
• it is about religious words.• ‘religion’ conforms to the Christian model• creeds – ‘confessions of faith’ – are normal; • Classical Western philosophy is normative: the
Greeks and Medievals;• Modern Western philosophy -- from
Descartes & Empiricism to contemporary successors -- is normative
![Page 8: A New Philosophy of Religion? Ivan Strenski IAHR, Toronto, 16 August 2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062812/568163c8550346895dd4ff4f/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Classic analytic philosophy of religion presumes religion...
• = propositional – statements, at times routinely identified with “theology”;
• = “spiritual,” disembodied, • = ‘internal,’ private• has ‘neither weight nor takes up space;• = neither temporal, nor historical;• = neither cultural, social, nor inter-subjective;• presumes a discrete, bodiless, personal and
‘interventionist’ deity
![Page 9: A New Philosophy of Religion? Ivan Strenski IAHR, Toronto, 16 August 2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062812/568163c8550346895dd4ff4f/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
But if “religion” differs, philosophy of religion should, too
![Page 10: A New Philosophy of Religion? Ivan Strenski IAHR, Toronto, 16 August 2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062812/568163c8550346895dd4ff4f/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Analytic political philosophy could serve as our model of a new philosophy of
religion:viz. Ernest Gellner and Isaiah Berlin
![Page 11: A New Philosophy of Religion? Ivan Strenski IAHR, Toronto, 16 August 2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062812/568163c8550346895dd4ff4f/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Their kind of political philosophy reflected on toleration, ideology, liberty, equality, diversity, modernity, nationalism, civil society, authority, despotism, power, republics, totalitarianism, servitude, sovereignty -- a “lived” politics --
historically & analytically articulated
![Page 12: A New Philosophy of Religion? Ivan Strenski IAHR, Toronto, 16 August 2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062812/568163c8550346895dd4ff4f/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
What Concept of
“Religion,” Then?
![Page 13: A New Philosophy of Religion? Ivan Strenski IAHR, Toronto, 16 August 2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062812/568163c8550346895dd4ff4f/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
“Lived” Religion
![Page 14: A New Philosophy of Religion? Ivan Strenski IAHR, Toronto, 16 August 2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062812/568163c8550346895dd4ff4f/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
“Religion” as
“the administration of the sacred”(Durkheim)
• An abiding source of energy, • A basis for identity, • Basis of authority, legitimacy, purpose, • A foundation for human flourishing, • Immanent in everyday life,• An environment in time and space.
![Page 15: A New Philosophy of Religion? Ivan Strenski IAHR, Toronto, 16 August 2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062812/568163c8550346895dd4ff4f/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Religion Is Not, Therefore
• about discrete acts of divine intervention;• about existential crises;• about the extraordinary or weird; • even about superhuman beings;
![Page 16: A New Philosophy of Religion? Ivan Strenski IAHR, Toronto, 16 August 2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062812/568163c8550346895dd4ff4f/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
This New Philosophy of
Lived ReligionWould Do What with Religion,
Exactly?
![Page 17: A New Philosophy of Religion? Ivan Strenski IAHR, Toronto, 16 August 2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062812/568163c8550346895dd4ff4f/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Reflect on the conditions of
Affiliation
Material Culture
![Page 18: A New Philosophy of Religion? Ivan Strenski IAHR, Toronto, 16 August 2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062812/568163c8550346895dd4ff4f/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
For Example….
Affiliation• Is religious affiliation
essentially hierarchical?• Must it be authoritarian?• How do rites establish
affiliation?• Why are bonds of affiliation
formed in religions often stronger than natural ones?
Material Culture• What physical changes
would make a particular sacred site more so, or less?
• Is there a general or even universal language of sacred space?
• Under what conditions does the materiality of religion serve or hinder a religion?
![Page 19: A New Philosophy of Religion? Ivan Strenski IAHR, Toronto, 16 August 2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062812/568163c8550346895dd4ff4f/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Reflect on the conditions of
Practices Emotional life
![Page 20: A New Philosophy of Religion? Ivan Strenski IAHR, Toronto, 16 August 2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062812/568163c8550346895dd4ff4f/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
For Example…..
Practices• Is there a sense in which
practices are merely external?
• To what extent can a regime of religious practices exist in the absence of beliefs?
• How do religious practices and moral principles articulate? Can they?
Emotional life
• Why are religious music and the emotions so closely linked? And, ‘emotions’ in what sense? Moods?
• Do religious emotions have cognitive value?
• Is there such a thing as religious emotional intelligence?
![Page 21: A New Philosophy of Religion? Ivan Strenski IAHR, Toronto, 16 August 2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062812/568163c8550346895dd4ff4f/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Reflect on the conditions of
Bodies Cultures Communities
![Page 22: A New Philosophy of Religion? Ivan Strenski IAHR, Toronto, 16 August 2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062812/568163c8550346895dd4ff4f/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
For Example….
Bodies• Male or female, Race: How
do they make a difference?• Age, Virility, Nubility: How
do they make a difference?• Whole or parts: what
matters most?• Fundamental biology: its
role, if any?
C
• Can there be ‘society ‘ without sacrifice?
• What are the minimum conditions for speaking of a religious culture or society?
• Why do men rule?• Why is the Buddhist Sangha
the longest lived voluntary community in the world?
Cultures Communities
![Page 23: A New Philosophy of Religion? Ivan Strenski IAHR, Toronto, 16 August 2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062812/568163c8550346895dd4ff4f/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
One More Thing ….
![Page 24: A New Philosophy of Religion? Ivan Strenski IAHR, Toronto, 16 August 2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062812/568163c8550346895dd4ff4f/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Is This Just Pre-Modern Religion?
![Page 25: A New Philosophy of Religion? Ivan Strenski IAHR, Toronto, 16 August 2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062812/568163c8550346895dd4ff4f/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Or, Is It Post-Post-Modern?
![Page 26: A New Philosophy of Religion? Ivan Strenski IAHR, Toronto, 16 August 2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062812/568163c8550346895dd4ff4f/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Have I Given Up On Philosophy?
![Page 27: A New Philosophy of Religion? Ivan Strenski IAHR, Toronto, 16 August 2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062812/568163c8550346895dd4ff4f/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Maybe
![Page 28: A New Philosophy of Religion? Ivan Strenski IAHR, Toronto, 16 August 2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062812/568163c8550346895dd4ff4f/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
But, Not Very Likely
![Page 29: A New Philosophy of Religion? Ivan Strenski IAHR, Toronto, 16 August 2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062812/568163c8550346895dd4ff4f/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Congenial Ideas for
Future Thinking, #1
“It is no use walking anywhere to preach unless our walking is
our preaching.”
![Page 30: A New Philosophy of Religion? Ivan Strenski IAHR, Toronto, 16 August 2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062812/568163c8550346895dd4ff4f/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Congenial Ideas for
Future Thinking, #2
“Preach the Gospel at all times, and
when necessary use words.”
![Page 31: A New Philosophy of Religion? Ivan Strenski IAHR, Toronto, 16 August 2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062812/568163c8550346895dd4ff4f/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Francis of Assisi (1181-1226)
FinisFinis