a multiphasic model describing the co2 injection problem
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: A Multiphasic Model Describing the CO2 Injection Problem](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020202/575024af1a28ab877eb00b9f/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
PAMM · Proc. Appl. Math. Mech. 10, 373 – 374 (2010) / DOI 10.1002/pamm.201010179
A Multiphasic Model Describing the CO2 Injection Problem
Irina Komarova1,∗ and Wolfgang Ehlers1
1 Institute of Applied Mechanics (CE), Pfaffenwaldring 7, 70569 Stuttgart / Germany
Internet: http://www.mechbau.uni-stuttgart.de/ls2
According to the annual data, the portion of ejected carbon dioxide (CO2) into the atmosphere is much higher in comparison
to other greenhouse gases. Therefore, the development of various scenarios in order to reduce the CO2 concentration in the
atmosphere is nowadays a challenge and a relevant subject in research. The current investigation is dedicated to the modelling
of a CO2 injection into a water-saturated aquifer as the most capable reservoir, where its upward migration is blocked by
a dense cap-rock layer. The major part of the study is focused on two specific processes taking place in the stored reser-
voir: the phase transfer phenomenon of the supercritical CO2 which occurs under changeable surrounding conditions and
the sequestration-driven deformation of the solid skeleton acting under the pressure of the pumped CO2. For the numerical
simulations within a continuum-mechanical framework, a multiphasic model based on the Theory of Porous Media is intro-
duced. Moreover, the main principles of developing a constitutive equation for the mass production term for the mass balance
equation are discussed here.
c© 2010 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
1 Introduction
There are different ideas and scenarios developed in the present, which can help to reduce CO2 emissions into the atmosphere
[1]. Besides other possibilities, one of the ways to reduce the amount of the CO2 in the atmosphere is its disposal into saline
aquifers. It is obvious that injection of CO2 will rise the variety of coupled physical, chemical and mechanical processes in the
reservoir. The current investigation is focused only on some of them, such as the solid deformation and the phase transition
phenomenon. These processes could be well described using the continuum-mechanical framework of the Theory of Porous
Media [2]. Herein, the theoretical description of the model is introduced with a particular attention on the specific constitutive
equations for the considered CO2 injection problem.
2 Theoretical Framework
Following the basic concepts of the Theory of Porous Media (TPM), the properties of a multiphasic aggregate with several
individual constituents ϕα with α ∈ {S: solid, β: fluids} are based on a statistical distribution of the components over a
representative elementary volume. Within the TPM, the deformation of the solid matrix ϕS is given within a Lagrangean
description, whereas the fluid constituents ϕβ are described by a modified Eulerian description, where the seepage velocities
of the fluid phases are represented with respect to the velocity of the solid constituent.
supercriticalregion
triple
criticalpoint
point
gaseous
liquid
solid
θ [K]θtr = 216.6 θc = 304.18
0.5
7.38
p [MPa]
Fig. 1 CO2 phase diagram.
The examined porous media model consists of a solid skeleton percolated
by several fluid phases. More precisely, two different approaches regard-
ing the number of the fluid phases are proposed for a consideration. Both
models consist of a solid constituent ϕS represented by the rock and a liq-
uid phase ϕW represented by the water in the aquifer. The difference be-
tween the two formulations is given by the description of the CO2 state.
In the frame of the first formulation, the CO2 occurs only in the supercrit-
ical phase ϕL without any phase transition, while the second formulation
includes phase transition by the possibility for the CO2 to be divided into
two phases: liquid or gaseous ϕG and supercritical ϕL, cf. Fig. 1. The split-
ting of the CO2 into two different phases can occur during the propagation
in the aquifer caused by a change of the surrounding conditions (p, θ). This
leads to the fact that CO2 can change its phase.
Therefore, the question arises how to describe the phase-exchange process carefully. This problem can be solved by providing
an additional constitutive equation for the mass production term, which defines the amount of the supercritical CO2 transferred
into the gaseous CO2 over time.
Within the modelling of coupled multiphasic problems, the behaviour of each constituent can be mathematically described
by primary variables. Usually, as a kinematic primary variable for the solid skeleton ϕS , the displacement vector uS is chosen.
For the fluid phase ϕβ , the pressure usually is taken as primary variable, whereas, for the temperature dependent problem, the
temperature θ is taken into account. The general form of the corresponding governing equations (momentum balance, mass
∗ Corresponding author e-mail: [email protected], Phone: +49 711 685 - 69253, Fax: +49 711 685 - 66347
c© 2010 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
![Page 2: A Multiphasic Model Describing the CO2 Injection Problem](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020202/575024af1a28ab877eb00b9f/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
374 Section 7: Coupled Problems
balance and energy balance) can be found, for example, in [2]. Further on, by evaluation of the entropy inequality, most of
the constitutive relations which are necessary to close the system of the equation could be derived, cf. [4]. Other constitutive
relations could be developed separately using, for example, the basic thermodynamical principles. Within this contribution,
only some specific constitutive constraints are introduced.
More precisely, the materially incompressible solid exhibits elastic properties. The momentum and energy production
terms differ for the two approaches caused by the mass production term ρG. The seepage velocities for the fluid phases are
described by modified Darcy law. The liquid phase represented by water is materially incompressible, while the other fluid
phases represented by supercritical or gaseous CO2 are materially compressible and described by the Peng-Robinson equation
of state [3]:
pGR =RG θ
ν − B−
A αω
ν2 + 2 B ν − B2. (1)
Therein, A and B are constants depending on the critical properties of CO2, ν is the specific volume, RG = RG/MG is the
specific gas constant, and αω is a constant depending on the acentric factor ω. The capillary-pressure-saturation relationship
between the fluid phases is presented by the van Genuchten law, [4] . Additionally, the constitutive equation for the mass
production is developed. In order to derive this constitutive relation, the entropy balance is used:
ρα(ηα)′α = div (−1
θq
α) +1
θρα rα + ζα . (2)
In (2), ηα is the entropy, qα is the heat flux, which can be calculated by Fourier’s law, rα is the external loading (radiation),
which is set to zero here, ζα = ηα − ραηα is the entropy production term and∑
α ηα ≥ 0. For a reversible process, as
provided in this investigation, a strong assumption can be used stating that the sum of the entropy productions terms is equal
to zero:∑
α ηα = 0. Under this restriction, the relation for the mass production term ρG can be easily found as
ρG =1
ηG − ηL
∑
α
(
−div (1
θq
α) − ρα(ηα)′α +1
θραrα
)
. (3)
The numerical treatment of the problem is carried out by the implementation into the Finite-Element solver PANDAS
(Porous media Adaptive Nonlinear finite element solver based on Differential Algebraic Systems).
3 Carbon Dioxide Injection into an Aquifer
The presented numerical example (Fig. 2) shows the influence of the distribution of the CO2 plume within the reservoir on the
deformation of the solid skeleton within the cap-rock layer and aquifer excluding the possible effects from phase transition
process.
Herein, the CO2 is injected from the left side into the aquifer
at the supercritical state with a density of ρ = 479 [kg/m3]. The
aquifer has the permeability KS0S = 10−7 [m2], while the perme-
ability of the cap-rock is KS0S = 10−13 [m2]. The Lame con-
stants of the solid skeleton are µS = 5.58 · 107 [kN/m2], λS =8.36 · 107 [kN/m2] corresponding to sand. As a result of the simula-
tion, the distribution of the liquid saturation is illustrated in the Fig. 2.
More specifically, a propagation of the CO2 within the aquifer caused
by the buoyancy forces is shown on the picture. The CO2 is blocked
by the nearly dense cap-rock layer and stays within the reservoir.
Further investigation will be focused on the implementation of the
phase-exchange process between CO2 phases into the model using
the constitutive equation presented above.
0.1
0.5
0.98
cap-rock
aquifer
CO2
sL
Fig. 2 CO2 injection into aquifer.
References
[1] B. Metz, O. Davidson, H. C. de Coninck, M. Loos and L. A. Meyer (eds.), Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage (Cambridge University
Press, Cambridge, 2005), p. 442.
[2] W. Ehlers, International Journal of Advances in Engineering Sciences and Applied Mathematics 1, 1–24 (2009).
[3] D.-Y. Peng and D. B. Robinson, Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Fundamentals 15, 59–64 (1976).
[4] T. Graf, Multiphasic flow processes in deformable porous media under consideration of fluid phase transitions. Dissertation, Report
No. II-17 of the Institute of Applied Mechanics (CE), University of Stuttgart 2008.
c© 2010 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim www.gamm-proceedings.com