a model for technology acceptance in law enforcement

19
A Model for Technology Acceptance in Law Enforcement A Case Study involving Lawful Intercept Technology at a Prosecutor's Office By Vincent Gisonti May 4, 2012

Upload: cole-ware

Post on 03-Jan-2016

49 views

Category:

Documents


6 download

DESCRIPTION

A Case Study involving Lawful Intercept Technology at a Prosecutor's Office By Vincent Gisonti May 4, 2012. A Model for Technology Acceptance in Law Enforcement. What is technology acceptance?. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: A Model for Technology Acceptance in Law Enforcement

A Model for Technology Acceptance in Law

EnforcementA Case Study involving Lawful Intercept

Technology at a Prosecutor's OfficeBy

Vincent GisontiMay 4, 2012

Page 2: A Model for Technology Acceptance in Law Enforcement

What is technology acceptance?

Gattiker (1984) defined technology acceptance as “an individual’s psychological state with regard to his or her voluntary or intended use of a particular technology.”

Morris (1996) defined technology acceptance as “the degree to which an individual decides to use a technology.”

Page 3: A Model for Technology Acceptance in Law Enforcement

Why study technology acceptance?

An important area of research

Many technology acceptance models

User population, technology and context

Page 4: A Model for Technology Acceptance in Law Enforcement

What is a Mandatory Use Environment

Sørebø & Eikebrokk (2008) defined this term as an environment “consisting of an information system that users have to use in order to fulfill tasks that are required for their job assignments.”

Brown et al, (2002) defined a mandatory use environment as “one in which employees must use a specific system in order to perform their work tasks and to keep their jobs.”

Page 5: A Model for Technology Acceptance in Law Enforcement

Why study technology acceptance in a law enforcement?

Lack of research in technology acceptance

Bias in law enforcement research

Page 6: A Model for Technology Acceptance in Law Enforcement

Criminal Justice System

Page 7: A Model for Technology Acceptance in Law Enforcement

Why study technology acceptance in a prosecutor’s office?

Technology acceptance is dependent on user population, technology and the context in which the technology is used.

Distinct role and responsibilities

Distinct mission

Page 8: A Model for Technology Acceptance in Law Enforcement

Why study technology acceptance in a prosecutor’s office?

To date there has been no technology acceptance research involving prosecutor’s offices.

Page 9: A Model for Technology Acceptance in Law Enforcement

What are Law Enforcement Technologies?

Police Technologies

Legal Technologies

Page 10: A Model for Technology Acceptance in Law Enforcement

What is Lawful Intercept Technology?

Court-ordered electronic eavesdropping

A potent but controversial tool

Page 11: A Model for Technology Acceptance in Law Enforcement

Why Study Lawful Intercept Technology?

Page 12: A Model for Technology Acceptance in Law Enforcement

Why Study Lawful Intercept Technology?

• Challenges and Criticism– Network security– Vulnerability– Privacy– Minimization, Professional Hearing, and

Entextualization– Statistics– Advances in telecommunications

Page 13: A Model for Technology Acceptance in Law Enforcement

Why Study Lawful Intercept Technology?

To date there has been no technology acceptance research of lawful intercept technology.

Page 14: A Model for Technology Acceptance in Law Enforcement

04/20/23 14

Law Enforcement Technology Acceptance Model (LEM)

Intention

Attitude

Subjective Norm

Perceived Behavioral

Control

Relative Advantage

Compatibility

Complexity

Observability

Peer Influence

Subordinate Influence

Superior Influence

Computer Self-Efficacy

Top Mgmt Support

User Support

IS Professionalism

User Training

Availability

Page 15: A Model for Technology Acceptance in Law Enforcement

04/20/23 15

Research Questions

• What factors influence technology acceptance of lawful intercept technology in a law enforcement setting?

• How do these technology acceptance factors influence each other?

• Do the values of these factors differ between and among investigators and attorneys in the law enforcement domain?

Page 16: A Model for Technology Acceptance in Law Enforcement

04/20/23 16

Method

• Combination of qualitative and quantitative methods has been found to provide a fuller understanding of the research questions being investigated. (Akbulut, 2003; Lapczynski, 2004; Saviak, 2007)

• Qualitative method will involve interviews of six investigators and two attorneys

• Quantitative method will involve a survey of 150 investigators and 25 attorneys

• Analysis using standard techniques

Page 17: A Model for Technology Acceptance in Law Enforcement

04/20/23 17

Research Contributions

• Theoretical Contributions• This study responds to the need for and improves the

understanding of technology acceptance, in general, and mandatory-use environments, specifically.

• This study responds to the need for and improves the understanding of technology acceptance in a previously unstudied domain, prosecutor's offices, a vital and distinct component of the criminal justice system.

• This study responds to the need for and improves the understanding of technology acceptance of a previously unstudied technology, lawful intercept technology, one of the most potent and controversial technologies used by law enforcement.

Page 18: A Model for Technology Acceptance in Law Enforcement

04/20/23 18

Research Contributions

• Practical Contributions• The literature asserts that awareness of technology acceptance

factors will help aid in the development of policies, guide the implementation of technology, and improve the productivity and efficiency of users. (Mullen, 1996; Akbulut, 2003; Colvin and Goh, 2005; Hu, Lin, and Chen, 2005; Scott, 2006; Tosun, 2006; Saviak, 2007; Yalcinkaya, 2007; Lai, 2008)

• This study supports the work of information technology administrators, in general, by identifying factors that influence a user's acceptance of technology.

• This study supports the work of information technology administrators in law enforcement, specifically, by identifying factors that influence an investigator's and attorney's acceptance of technology.

Page 19: A Model for Technology Acceptance in Law Enforcement

A Model for Technology Acceptance in Law Enforcement

Remaining tasks: Survey and Analysis