a. martyniuk a, p. miyagawa b, m. owen c, o. trifis c, v. chavda c, and u.k. yang c a: university of...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: A. Martyniuk a, P. Miyagawa b, M. Owen c, O. Trifis c, V. Chavda c, and U.K. Yang c a: University of Victoria b: University of Sheffield c: University](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649ec65503460f94bd21ba/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
A. MartyniukA. Martyniukaa, P. Miyagawa, P. Miyagawabb, M. Owen, M. Owencc, O. , O. TrifisTrifiscc, V. Chavda, V. Chavdacc, and U.K. Yang, and U.K. Yangcc
a: a: University of VictoriaUniversity of Victoriab: b: University of SheffieldUniversity of Sheffield
c: c: University of ManchesterUniversity of Manchester
Higgs Meeting, August 27, 2012Higgs Meeting, August 27, 2012
1
Thanks to the Editorial Board: Michel Vetterli (Chair)Martin zur Nedden, Wouter Verkerke, James Ferrando
![Page 2: A. Martyniuk a, P. Miyagawa b, M. Owen c, O. Trifis c, V. Chavda c, and U.K. Yang c a: University of Victoria b: University of Sheffield c: University](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649ec65503460f94bd21ba/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
A charged Higgs boson is predicted by the Beyond SM: Two Higgs Doublet Model: H0, h0, A0, H±
Charged Higgs productions from top quark decays Huge top production, focus on H H++cs cs at low tan Complementary to HH++at high tan
2
ν
W+
W/H-
b-jet
b-jet
jet
jet
t
e/
t
![Page 3: A. Martyniuk a, P. Miyagawa b, M. Owen c, O. Trifis c, V. Chavda c, and U.K. Yang c a: University of Victoria b: University of Sheffield c: University](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649ec65503460f94bd21ba/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Dijet mass 2 fitter Semi-leptonic tt sample
3
ν
W+
W/H-
b-jet
b-jet
jet
jet
t
e/
t
Likelihood Fit, Br(tH+b): Discovery or 95% Limits
![Page 4: A. Martyniuk a, P. Miyagawa b, M. Owen c, O. Trifis c, V. Chavda c, and U.K. Yang c a: University of Victoria b: University of Sheffield c: University](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649ec65503460f94bd21ba/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Previous analysis with 35 pb-1 data (≥ 1 b-tag), comparable to the Tevatron limits ( ATL-CONF-2011-127, ATL-COM-PHYS-2011-130)
Updated analysis with 4.7 pb-1 (2011 full data) High-pt lepton with 4 jets (at least 2 b-tag)
Single lepton trigger samples Use the Top group selection cuts and have a good agreement Lep Pt>25 (e), 20 (m), Jet Pt>25, MET> 35(e), 20(m), MV1 w>0.6 The list of the full event selections cuts is in the backup slide
Supporting document ATL-COM-PHYS-2012-660
The updated analysis has a conditional approval in June, 2012 Issues with systematic Issues with fit stability
4
![Page 5: A. Martyniuk a, P. Miyagawa b, M. Owen c, O. Trifis c, V. Chavda c, and U.K. Yang c a: University of Victoria b: University of Sheffield c: University](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649ec65503460f94bd21ba/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
A dijet mass 2 fitter: lepton plus 4 jets Improved the dijet mass dist. by reconstructing whole ttbar event Constrain W(e/m) and top quarks masses to be the PDG values, by
floating jet/lepton energy within their resolutions The 5th jet can be replaced as a W daughter jets with any of the two
untagged 3rd, 4th jets Remove poorly reconstructed events with 2<10
5Before Fitting After Fitting
![Page 6: A. Martyniuk a, P. Miyagawa b, M. Owen c, O. Trifis c, V. Chavda c, and U.K. Yang c a: University of Victoria b: University of Sheffield c: University](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649ec65503460f94bd21ba/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Signals and background templates
Seven H+ signal templates from 90 to 150 GeV by 10 GeV step
SM ttbar template
Non-ttbar template (10%): Single top, W/Z+jets, QCD, and diboson
![Page 7: A. Martyniuk a, P. Miyagawa b, M. Owen c, O. Trifis c, V. Chavda c, and U.K. Yang c a: University of Victoria b: University of Sheffield c: University](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649ec65503460f94bd21ba/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Set limits on the branching ratio to charged Higgs boson using the frequentic procedure
A likelihood function is define as
where ni: observed events, i: expected events in each bin
Limits are calculated on a test Statistics qb based on a profile Likelihood ratio
7
The exp. events of ttbar bkg and H+ signal as BR(tH+b)
![Page 8: A. Martyniuk a, P. Miyagawa b, M. Owen c, O. Trifis c, V. Chavda c, and U.K. Yang c a: University of Victoria b: University of Sheffield c: University](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649ec65503460f94bd21ba/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Missing contributions in the limits b-JES/c-JES syst. Mtop syst. Updated Stop t-ch. norm
Implementation of the syst. band in the kinematic distributions
Check the output nuisance parameters and their correlations
(N-1) limits to show the syst. effect of each item
Limits without a constraint on the (ttbar)
8
Limits presented in the approval meeting in June
Raised in the Higgs Approval meeting and by the Edboard
![Page 9: A. Martyniuk a, P. Miyagawa b, M. Owen c, O. Trifis c, V. Chavda c, and U.K. Yang c a: University of Victoria b: University of Sheffield c: University](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649ec65503460f94bd21ba/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
![Page 10: A. Martyniuk a, P. Miyagawa b, M. Owen c, O. Trifis c, V. Chavda c, and U.K. Yang c a: University of Victoria b: University of Sheffield c: University](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649ec65503460f94bd21ba/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Missing syst. contributions (b-/c-JES, Mtop, proper Stop t-ch. norm.) are included. Their contributions are small (done)
After ICHEP deadline passed, we decided to update our analysis• Use the most updated JES calibration and it’s uncertainty ( tag 00-05-09): lower eff. for Njet>=4 cut• Use the updated luminosity with small error: 4.66 /fb with 1.8% (old:
4.71/fb with 3.4%) no change in the data, but the bkgd prediction based on the MC is reduced by 1.2%
10
Implementation of the syst. band the kinematic distributions (done) Check the output nuisance parameters and their correlations (done) Limits without a constraint on the (ttbar) (done) (N-1) limits to show the syst. effect of each item (done)
![Page 11: A. Martyniuk a, P. Miyagawa b, M. Owen c, O. Trifis c, V. Chavda c, and U.K. Yang c a: University of Victoria b: University of Sheffield c: University](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649ec65503460f94bd21ba/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
oldnew
data
SMttbar
old
new
![Page 12: A. Martyniuk a, P. Miyagawa b, M. Owen c, O. Trifis c, V. Chavda c, and U.K. Yang c a: University of Victoria b: University of Sheffield c: University](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649ec65503460f94bd21ba/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
![Page 13: A. Martyniuk a, P. Miyagawa b, M. Owen c, O. Trifis c, V. Chavda c, and U.K. Yang c a: University of Victoria b: University of Sheffield c: University](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649ec65503460f94bd21ba/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
![Page 14: A. Martyniuk a, P. Miyagawa b, M. Owen c, O. Trifis c, V. Chavda c, and U.K. Yang c a: University of Victoria b: University of Sheffield c: University](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649ec65503460f94bd21ba/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
The fit results are consistent with null Higgs hypothesis
14
Stat. Only
![Page 15: A. Martyniuk a, P. Miyagawa b, M. Owen c, O. Trifis c, V. Chavda c, and U.K. Yang c a: University of Victoria b: University of Sheffield c: University](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649ec65503460f94bd21ba/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
mH=90 GeV mH=110 GeV
![Page 16: A. Martyniuk a, P. Miyagawa b, M. Owen c, O. Trifis c, V. Chavda c, and U.K. Yang c a: University of Victoria b: University of Sheffield c: University](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649ec65503460f94bd21ba/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
The effect of the individual syst.?
The only one syst. Item is removed in the fit, “(N-1)” limit Basically, the (N-1) limits are close to the N limits due to the
correlations with other parameters
16
![Page 17: A. Martyniuk a, P. Miyagawa b, M. Owen c, O. Trifis c, V. Chavda c, and U.K. Yang c a: University of Victoria b: University of Sheffield c: University](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649ec65503460f94bd21ba/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Groups of the correlated systematic JES, Mtop, bJES: c bTag, (ttbar) Gen, I/FSR, PS and JER
mH=90 GeV
![Page 18: A. Martyniuk a, P. Miyagawa b, M. Owen c, O. Trifis c, V. Chavda c, and U.K. Yang c a: University of Victoria b: University of Sheffield c: University](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649ec65503460f94bd21ba/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
A group of the correlated parameters (x) is removed in the fit to check the effect of their syst. on the limits
The (N-x) limits look reasonable
![Page 19: A. Martyniuk a, P. Miyagawa b, M. Owen c, O. Trifis c, V. Chavda c, and U.K. Yang c a: University of Victoria b: University of Sheffield c: University](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649ec65503460f94bd21ba/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
In the current fit,(ttbar) is constrained with +7%/-9% uncertainties
What if we remove this constraint? basically 2 parameter fitting: Br(tH+b) and (ttbar) The limits are not changed The resulting cross sections are consistent with the SM
19
![Page 20: A. Martyniuk a, P. Miyagawa b, M. Owen c, O. Trifis c, V. Chavda c, and U.K. Yang c a: University of Victoria b: University of Sheffield c: University](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649ec65503460f94bd21ba/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
The full 2011 data (4.7 fb-1) have been analyzed to search for a charged Higgs from top quark decays.
The results are consistent with null Higgs hypothesis The 95% limits on Br(tH+b) are set between 5% to 1%,
depending mHare improved by a factor of 5 to 10, with respect to the current best limits in csbar channel
The limits, equivalent to the limits from the three combined tau channels.
We plan to publish these results
20
![Page 21: A. Martyniuk a, P. Miyagawa b, M. Owen c, O. Trifis c, V. Chavda c, and U.K. Yang c a: University of Victoria b: University of Sheffield c: University](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649ec65503460f94bd21ba/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
![Page 22: A. Martyniuk a, P. Miyagawa b, M. Owen c, O. Trifis c, V. Chavda c, and U.K. Yang c a: University of Victoria b: University of Sheffield c: University](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649ec65503460f94bd21ba/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Semi-leptonic channel: e/ plus at least 4 jets (2 b-tag) Use the Top group selection cuts and have full agreement:
acceptance challenge Cuts are:
One el with ET > 25 GeV & |η| < 2.47, with a veto (1.37 < |η| < 1.52), OR one mu with pT > 20 GeV and |η| < 2.5 with single lepton triggers (EF_e20_medium,EF_e22_medium, EF_mu18, EF_mu18_medium)
Remove events tagged as e-mu overlap Require a primary vertex with at least five tracks MET > 35 GeV (el), OR MET > 20 GeV (mu) Mt(W) > 25 GeV (el) OR MET + Mt(W) > 60 GeV (mu)
≥ 4 jets with ET > 25 GeV and |η| < 2.5 and |JVF|>0.75
Events with loose bad jets with pT > 20 GeV are rejected ≥ 2 jet tagged with MV1 weight > 0.601713
22
![Page 23: A. Martyniuk a, P. Miyagawa b, M. Owen c, O. Trifis c, V. Chavda c, and U.K. Yang c a: University of Victoria b: University of Sheffield c: University](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649ec65503460f94bd21ba/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
SM ttbar (~90% of the total bkgd) Use MC@NLO sample for shape and normalization with NNLO cross
section W+jets, Wbb/cc+jets, Wc+jets (~3.6% of the total bkgd)
Use ALPGEN interfaced with Herwig samples for shape and normalization
Normalized with K*cross sections plus the SFs derived from the Top W+jets group based on the W+/W- charge asymmetry in the data
Single top (~3.7% of the total bkgd) Use MC@NLO sample for Wt and s-channel, but AcerMC for t-channel
normalized with NNLO cross section (also shape) Multi-jets (~2.5% of the total bkgd)
Use anti-electron data-driven method provided by the Top fake group (normalization)
23
![Page 24: A. Martyniuk a, P. Miyagawa b, M. Owen c, O. Trifis c, V. Chavda c, and U.K. Yang c a: University of Victoria b: University of Sheffield c: University](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649ec65503460f94bd21ba/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
![Page 25: A. Martyniuk a, P. Miyagawa b, M. Owen c, O. Trifis c, V. Chavda c, and U.K. Yang c a: University of Victoria b: University of Sheffield c: University](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649ec65503460f94bd21ba/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Powheg plus Herwig vs Pythia? With Pythia AMTB1 tune: 11% difference in acceptance, disfavored
by the jet shape data. New PS syt. with Pythia Perugia 2011 C tune:3% difference in acceptance
The effect due to the PS on the limit is very minimal.
Pythia AMBT1 tune Pythia Perugia 2011 C tune