a life history perspective on size, health and adult mortality in the gambia
DESCRIPTION
A life history perspective on size, health and adult mortality in the Gambia. Rebecca Sear London School of Economics. Life history theory and demography. Life history is concerned with allocation of energy over the life course - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
A life history perspective on size, A life history perspective on size, health and adult mortality in the health and adult mortality in the
GambiaGambia
Rebecca Sear
London School of Economics
Life history theory and demographyLife history theory and demography
• Life history is concerned with allocation of energy over the life course
• How do organisms solve problem of adaptively allocating energy between growth, body subsistence and repair, and reproduction?
• Demography a key component of LHT – both a constraint on, and an outcome of, life history decisions
Adult mortality and resource Adult mortality and resource availabilityavailability
• This study investigates relationship between adult mortality and resource availability
• Measures of resources availability
– Height
– BMI
– Haemoglobin (Hb)
HeightHeight
• Height: measure of past investment in growth
– Previous research:
• Human studies (height):
– height usually found to be negatively correlated with mortality
– but recent evidence suggests mortality higher in tall people for certain causes
• Animal studies (size):
– caloric restriction increases longevity
– costs of fast growth
BMI & HbBMI & Hb
• BMI & Hb: measures of current body condition
– Mortality should be inversely related to both BMI and Hb but
• What is the shape of the relationship?
• Does this relationship differ between women and men?
– Previous (human) studies suggest a non-linear relationship between BMI and mortality
AnalysisAnalysis
• Analysis of adult (21+ years) mortality by:– Height
– BMI
– Haemoglobin level
• Investigating both whether there is a relationship, and the shape of the relationship
• For both women and men
DataData
• Data collected 1950-74
• 4 rural villages
• Demographic data collected continuously
• Anthropometric surveys conducted (at least) annually
Adult anthropometricsAdult anthropometricsWomenWomen MenMen
Height (cm)
Mean 158 168 Range 122-178 128-197 N (measurements) 13,290 9,680BMI
Mean 20.7 20.4 Range 12-40 13-30 % underweight 16 13 % overweight 4 1 N (measurements) 11,598 9,674Hb (g/dl)
Mean 11.8 13.5 Range 2-17 3-20 % anaemic 48 33 N (measurements) 10,986 9,653
Height and ageHeight and age
154
156
158
160
162
164
166
168
20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75
Age
Hei
gh
t
Men
Women
BMI and ageBMI and age
18
18.5
19
19.5
20
20.5
21
21.5
22
20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75
Age
BM
I
Women
Men
Hb and ageHb and age
10
10.5
11
11.5
12
12.5
13
13.5
14
20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75
Age
Hb Women
Men
Adult mortalityAdult mortality
Age (years)
9080706050403020
Pro
po
rtio
n s
urv
ivin
g
1.0
.8
.6
.4
.2
0.0
Women
Men
MethodsMethods
• Discrete-time event-history analysis on probability of adult death (21+ years)
• Separate models for women and men
• Anthropometric variables entered as time dependent
• Controlled for birth cohort
ResultsResultsWomenWomen MenMen
Variable Estimate (SE)
Constant 84.3 (37.0)* 4.81 (4.64)
Age -0.02 (0.03) 0.07 (0.01)*
Height
Height2
-0.95 (0.47)*
0.003 (0.001)*
0.005 (0.01)
BMI
BMI2
-0.86 (0.27)*
0.02 (0.01)*
-0.91 (0.39)*
0.02 (0.01)*
Hb
Hb*age
-0.68 (0.14)*
0.01 (0.002)*
-0.23 (0.03)*
No. deaths 182 172
No. survivors 823 683
Height and mortalityHeight and mortality
0
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
135 140 145 150 155 160 165 170 175
Height (cm)
Pro
bab
ilit
y o
f d
yin
g
WomenMen
BMI and mortalityBMI and mortality
0
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
0.03
0.035
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
BMI
Pro
bab
ilit
y o
f d
yin
g
WomenMen
Hb and mortalityHb and mortality
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
0.14
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Haemoglobin
Pro
bab
ilit
y o
f d
yin
g
WomenMen
Conclusions IConclusions I
• Height:– matters for female mortality – though relationship not linear
– Why not for men?
• Measures of current body condition significantly correlated with mortality for both sexes– High BMI increases mortality (costs of fat storage?), but low
BMI more important
– Hb important for both sexes, especially women (maternal mortality?)
Conclusions IIConclusions II
• Clearly, there is variation in adult mortality by resource availability
• Though these relationships tend not to be linear• Current health/body condition matters for both sexes,
height only for women– growing tall has costs for women (or linked to greater
reproductive effort of tall women?), but apparently not for men?
• Influence of genetic factors?