a dual role for nicotine in reinforcement: the interaction between nicotine and non-drug cues (what...
TRANSCRIPT
A dual role for nicotine in reinforcement: the interaction between
nicotine and non-drug cues
(What can a lab rat tell us about why people smoke?)
Nadia Chaudhri
Center for NeuroscienceUniversity of Pittsburgh
Will pressfor
nicotine
Why do people smoke?
“nicotine is the drug in tobacco
that causes addiction”
Health Consequences of Smoking: Nicotine Addiction. A report by the Surgeon General, USDHHS, 1988
Nonpharmacological factors
• Smoking cigarettes is more rewarding than isolated nicotine delivery
• De-nicotinized cigarettes reduce craving and withdrawal
• Sensory stimuli, such as visual and olfactory cues associated with smoke are reinforcing
• Smoking cigarettes is more rewarding than isolated nicotine delivery
Nonpharmacological factors
• De-nicotinized cigarettes reduce craving and withdrawal
• Sensory stimuli, such as visual and olfactory cues associated with smoke are reinforcing
Do nonpharmacological stimuli impact nicotine self-administration in rats?
Nonpharmacological stimuli DOimpact nicotine reinforcement in rats
Nicotine and nonpharmacological stimuliinteract synergistically to result in high
levels of operant behavior
Dual-reinforcing properties of nicotine:
• Relatively weak, primary reinforcer
• Enhance the reinforcing properties of behaviorally relevant, nonpharmacological environmental stimuli
Donny EC, Chaudhri N & Caggiula AR et al. (2003)
Psychopharmacology
FR 1 FR 5FR 2
Fixed-ratio Reinforcement Schedule (60 min)
Responses : 3, 6, 10, 15, 20, 25, 32, 40 … Infusion # 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 …
Progressive Ratio Reinforcement Schedule (4 hours)
Signals
Cue Light
House Light
Infusion
Nic Delivery
(on) Nic +
(off) Nic -
Compound Visual Stimulus
• Male, Sprague Dawley rats• Reversed light/dark cycle• 20 g food per day• Prior food training
Nicotine self-administration in rats
Nicotine - 0.03 mg/kg/inf
Day
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Response on Active Lever20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
FR 1 FR 2 FR 5
Contingent nicotine + VS
Acquisition of NIC-SA with or without VS
Nicotine - 0.03 mg/kg/inf
Day
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Response on Active Lever20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
FR 1 FR 2 FR 5
Contingent nicotine + VS
Contingent Saline + VS
Contingent Saline + no VS
Acquisition of NIC-SA with or without VS
Nicotine - 0.03 mg/kg/inf
Day
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Response on Active Lever20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
FR 1 FR 2 FR 5
Contingent nicotine + VS
Contingent Saline + no VS
Contingent nicotine + no VSContingent Saline + VS
Acquisition of NIC-SA with or without VS
Nicotine - 0.03 mg/kg/inf
Day
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Response on Active Lever20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
FR 1 FR 2 FR 5
Contingent nicotine + VS
Contingent nicotine + no VSContingent Saline + VS
Nicotine + VS - additive
Acquisition of NIC-SA with or without VS
Interim summary
1. Nicotine does function as a primary reinforcer, although this effect is relatively weak in the absence of a nonpharmacological stimulus
2. Nicotine interacts synergistically with non-drug stimuli to promote stable, high levels of operant behavior
3. Like nicotine, the VS we use is also a weak primary reinforcer
• How does such a powerfully addictive behavior, smoking, emerge from such a weak primary reinforcer, nicotine?
Smoking paradox
Is nicotine functioning as more than
just a primary reinforcer?
• How can a weak primary reinforcer, nicotine,
synergize with environmental stimuli to produce high rates of self-administration in rats (and smoking in people)?
Impact of noncontingent NIC on responding for the VS
Donny EC, Chaudhri N & Caggiula AR et al. (2003) Psychopharmacology
Impact of noncontingent NIC on responding for the VS
Donny EC, Chaudhri N & Caggiula AR et al. (2003) Psychopharmacology
Interim summary
1) Is noncontingent nicotine as effective at enhancing the reinforcing value of the VS across a range of doses, and does it impact motivation to obtain the VS when assessed using a progressive ratio reinforcement schedule?
2) Does noncontingent nicotine enhance the salience of all nonpharmacological stimuli equally?
Nicotine, delivered noncontingently, elevated responding for a weakly reinforcing, nonpharmacological stimulus, suggesting that nicotine can enhance the reinforcing properties of:
Rats: Environmental stimuli in self-administration experimentsHumans: Sight, smell, taste of cigarette smoke and other stimuli in environment while smoking.
Impact of noncontingent NIC : dose-response
Session
Number of Reinforcers2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22 0.01 mg/kg/inf 0.03 mg/kg/inf 0.09 mg/kg/inf
FR5 FR5 FR59 11 13 15 1710 12 14 16 9 11 13 15 1710 12 14 16 9 11 13 15 1710 12 14 16
Noncontingent NIC + VSSaline + VS
Contingent NIC + VS
Impact of noncontingent NIC : dose-response
Session
Number of Reinforcers2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22 0.01 mg/kg/inf 0.03 mg/kg/inf 0.09 mg/kg/inf
FR5 FR5 FR59 11 13 15 1710 12 14 16 9 11 13 15 1710 12 14 16 9 11 13 15 1710 12 14 16
Noncontingent NIC + VSSaline + VS
Contingent NIC + VS
Impact of noncontingent NIC : dose-response
Session
Number of Reinforcers2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22 0.01 mg/kg/inf 0.03 mg/kg/inf 0.09 mg/kg/inf
FR5 FR5 FR59 11 13 15 1710 12 14 16 9 11 13 15 1710 12 14 16 9 11 13 15 1710 12 14 16
Noncontingent NIC + VSSaline + VS
Contingent NIC + VS
Session
Number of Reinforcers1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10 0.01 mg/kg/inf 0.03 mg/kg/inf 0.09 mg/kg/inf
Noncontingent NIC + VSSaline + VS
Contingent NIC + VS
PR PR PR1819 20 2122 2324 25 26 27 28 29 1819 20 2122 2324 25 26 27 28 29 1819 20 2122 2324 25 26 27 28 29
Impact of noncontingent NIC on a PR schedule
Session
Number of Reinforcers1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10 0.01 mg/kg/inf 0.03 mg/kg/inf 0.09 mg/kg/inf
Noncontingent NIC + VSSaline + VS
Contingent NIC + VS
PR PR PR1819 20 2122 2324 25 26 27 28 29 1819 20 2122 2324 25 26 27 28 29 1819 20 2122 2324 25 26 27 28 29
Impact of noncontingent NIC on a PR schedule
Does noncontingent nicotine enhance the salience of all nonpharmacological stimuli equally?
STIMULUS = 5 second tone onset and 5 second house light offset
Group 1 - PAIREDSucrose (60)
Stimulus (30)
Pavlovian conditioningDays 1-14; levers retracted
Group 2 - UNPAIREDSucrose (60)
Stimulus (30)
30 min
Pavlovian-to-Instrumental Transfer (Test-day) Day 15; levers extended; no sucrose; 30-min from 1st press
Self-administration sessions (FR and PR)
PAIRED UNPAIREDSaline + CR Saline + CRContingent NIC + CR Contingent NIC + CR Noncontingent NIC + CR Noncontingent NIC + CR
10
20
30
40
50 PAIRED (n=50)
Active lever Inactive Lever Stimulus CR (p)
Test-day
Paired
10
20
30
40
50 UNPAIRED (n=32)
Active lever Inactive Lever StimulusCR (un-p)
Unpaired
Session
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Number of Reinforcements5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Noncontingent SAL + CR (p) Noncontingent SAL + CR (un-p)
FR1 FR2 FR5 FR1
Impact of noncontingent NIC on a differentially reinforcing, nonpharmacological stimulus
Session
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Number of Reinforcements5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Contingent NIC + CR (p)Noncontingent SAL + CR (p)
FR1 FR2 FR5 FR1
Impact of noncontingent NIC on a differentially reinforcing, nonpharmacological stimulus
Paired Stimulus
Session
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Number of Reinforcements5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Contingent NIC + CR (p)Noncontingent NIC + CR (p) Noncontingent SAL + CR (p)
FR1 FR2 FR5 FR1
Impact of noncontingent NIC on a differentially reinforcing, nonpharmacological stimulus
Paired Stimulus
Session
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Number of Reinforcements5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Contingent NIC + CR (un-p) Noncontingent SAL + CR (un-p)
FR1 FR2 FR5 FR1
Impact of noncontingent NIC on a differentially reinforcing, nonpharmacological stimulus
Unpaired Stimulus
Session
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Number of Reinforcements5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Contingent NIC + CR (un-p) Noncontingent NIC + CR (un-p) Noncontingent SAL + CR (un-p)
FR1 FR2 FR5 FR1
Impact of noncontingent NIC on a differentially reinforcing, nonpharmacological stimulus
Unpaired Stimulus
Impact of noncontingent NIC on a differentially reinforcing, nonpharmacological stimulus
Session
25 26 27
Number of Reinforcements1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Noncontingent SAL + CR (p)
Noncontingent SAL + CR (un-p)
Progressive Ratio Schedule
Impact of noncontingent NIC on a differentially reinforcing, nonpharmacological stimulus
Session
25 26 27
Number of Reinforcements1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Contingent NIC + CR (p)
Noncontingent NIC + CR (p)
Noncontingent SAL + CR (p)
Progressive Ratio Schedule
Paired Stimulus
Impact of noncontingent NIC on a differentially reinforcing, nonpharmacological stimulus
Session
25 26 27
Number of Reinforcements1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Contingent NIC + CR (un-p)
Noncontingent SAL + CR (un-p)
Progressive Ratio Schedule
Unpaired Stimulus
Impact of noncontingent NIC on a differentially reinforcing, nonpharmacological stimulus
Session
25 26 27
Number of Reinforcements1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Contingent NIC + CR (un-p)
Noncontingent NIC + CR (un-p)
Noncontingent SAL + CR (un-p)
Progressive Ratio Schedule
Unpaired Stimulus
Impact of noncontingent NIC on a differentially reinforcing, nonpharmacological stimulus
Contingency by Pairing Interaction p <0.05
Reinforcements
(last 2 days of PR)
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Contingent NIC + CR
Noncontingent NIC + CR
Paired Unpaired
Interim summary
1. The reinforcement-enhancing effects of nicotine are not specific to one type of nonpharmacological stimulus, the VS
2. The ability of nicotine to enhance the reinforcing properties of a nonpharmacological stimulus depends on the reinforcing value of that stimulus
3. Like self-administered nicotine, response-independent nicotine delivery can increase motivation to obtain nonpharmacological stimuli, as tested with a progressive ratio schedule
““People smoke to receive nicotine”People smoke to receive nicotine”Primary Reinforcer: Behaviors that lead to nicotine delivery are strengthened
““Nicotine makes people smokeNicotine makes people smoke”Reinforcement-Enhancing: Nicotine can amplify or enhance the motivational/reinforcing properties of other stimuli by a mechanism that is not dependent on a predictable temporal (contingent) association with either the stimuli or the behavior
Why do people smoke?