a county school facility sales tax success story steve ptacek, superintendent, jacksonville cusd...
TRANSCRIPT
A County School Facility Sales Tax Success Story
Steve Ptacek, Superintendent, Jacksonville CUSD 117
Noel Beard, Board of Education President, Jacksonville CUSD 117
Michael Oldenettel, Sales Tax Referendum Campaign Committee Member
Kyle Harding, Bond Counsel, Chapman & Cutler LLP
Tammie Beckwith Schallmo, Financial Advisor, PMA Securities, Inc.
November 21, 2015
IASB – IASA – IASBO Joint Annual Conference
For a copy of this PowerPoint and much more visit:
Vision117.com
County School Facility Sales Tax Overview County School Facility Sales Tax Law enacted by General Assembly
on October 17, 2007, and amended on August 23, 2011, July 13, 2012 and August 27, 2013.
Law based on similar legislation in Iowa. Allows school districts to submit a ballot question to county voters to
implement a county sales tax for school facility purposes.– In 0.25% increments– Up to 1%
Of the 102 counties in Illinois, 62 have voted on the sales tax. Tax implemented in 33 counties. Tax imposed on the same general merchandise base as state sales
tax, excluding titled or registered tangible personal property (such as vehicles, watercraft, aircraft, trailers, and mobile homes) and qualifying food, drugs and medical supplies.
3
County SchoolFacility Sales Tax Map
4
5
“School Facility Purposes”
Acquisition, development, construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, improvement, financing, architectural planning and installation of capital facilities consisting of buildings, structures and durable equipment
Acquisition and improvement of real property required, or expected to be required, in connection with capital facilities
Payment of bonds or other obligations issued for school facility purposes (such as alternate bonds) or issued to refund such bonds or other obligations, provided that the taxes levied to pay such bonds are abated by the sales tax proceeds used to pay such bonds
Fire prevention, safety, energy conservation, disabled accessibility, school security, and specified repair purposes set forth under Section 17-2.11 of the School Code
6
Ballot Question
How to put the question on the ballot: The regional superintendent of schools (ROE) for the county must,
upon receipt of resolutions of school boards representing more than 50% of the student enrollment in the county, certify the question to the proper election authority.
Enrollment means the head count of students residing in the county on the last school day of September of each year, as reported on the Fall Housing Report.
Ballot question (form prescribed in law): "Shall a retailers’ occupation tax and a service occupation tax
(commonly referred to as a “sales tax”) be imposed in The County of __________, Illinois, at a rate of 1% to be used exclusively for school facility purposes?”
7
Election Results
A majority of the votes cast needed to pass If referendum is successful, the sales tax is imposed at
the rate set forth in the question The election results must be certified by the county clerk
and filed with the Illinois Department of Revenue (IDOR) If pass in March 2016, file with IDOR on or before May 1,
2016, tax begins on July 1, 2016 If pass in November 2016, file with IDOR on or before
May 1, 2017, tax begins on July 1, 2017
8
Flow of Funds
Tax is collected by IDOR and held by State Treasurer; State retains 2% of collections for administration costs.
By 25th of each month, IDOR certifies to State Comptroller the amount to be disbursed to the ROE for the counties where the tax has been imposed and collected during the second preceding calendar month.
Within 10 days after receipt of certification from IDOR, Comptroller causes orders to be drawn for amounts contained in the certification.
Within 30 days after receipt, ROE disburses sales tax proceeds to school districts.
9
Distribution of Funds
ROE distributes sales tax proceeds to school districts on a monthly basis– Distributed on enrollment basis– Only students residing in the county are eligible for funding– Need to determine distribution process with ROE
School districts must deposit the sales tax proceeds in a separate School Facility Occupation Tax Fund
Monies on deposit in the School Facility Occupation Tax Fund may only be used for “school facility purposes”
10
Duration of Sales Tax
No limit in sales tax law nor does law authorize inclusion of sunset in ballot proposition
Referenda required to reduce or discontinue the sales tax at any time– County Board must certify question to reduce or discontinue the
sales tax– If referendum is successful, sales tax will be reduced or
discontinued (as set forth in the ballot question), provided that such reduction or discontinuance does not adversely affect a district’s ability to pay debt service on bonds that are secured by sales tax receipts or necessitate the extension of additional property taxes to pay debt service on bonds (e.g., sales tax alternate bonds).
Timeline
11
Election Date March 15, 2016 November 8, 2016
Individual school boards representing more than 50% of total county
enrollment adopt resolution in support of CSFST referendum
Prior to December 28, 2015 Prior to August 22, 2016
ROE certifies ballot proposition to the County Clerk
Prior to January 7, 2016 Prior to August 31, 2016
County Clerk publishes election notice
Between February 14 and March 5, 2016
Between October 8 and October 28, 2016
County Clerk posts election notice Not later than March 5, 2016 Not later than October 28, 2016
Election day March 15, 2016 November 8, 2016
County Clerk canvasses election April 5, 2016 November 29, 2016
Sales tax effective date July 1, 2016 (provided canvass is filed with IDOR by May 1, 2016)
July 1, 2017 (provided canvass is filed with IDOR by May 1, 2017)
Sales tax revenues received monthly from ROE
Beginning no later than October, 2016
Beginning no later than October, 2017
12
Four Phases of CSFST Success
1. Preliminary Research and Planning
2. Pre-Referendum Community Engagement and Visioning
3. Referendum: Community Campaign
4. Post CSFST Referendum: Bond Sale
Phase I:
Preliminary Research and Planning
13
14
Jacksonville School District 117 General Overview
3300+ students grades K-12 76% of the students in Morgan County 62% Low Income 10 District Buildings
– One High School– One Junior High School– Six Elementary Schools– Central office/Kindergarten Center– “The Bowl” gymnasium
(Pre-K Centers in Morgan County Housing Spaces)
15
Political Overview
Very conservative county “Tea Party” influence Last successful referendum: 1978 2012 CSFST failed with only 36% yes vote Multiple failed referendums in past 35 years
16
Financial Limitations
Morgan County passed PTELL in 1996
JSD117 Debt Service (DSEB) is ZERO
(We can’t sell HLS bonds!)
Each year we use Ed. Fund money for HLS needs
17
State of District Facilities
Most recent building: JHS 1982 2 buildings 40+ years 1 building 50+ years 4 buildings 60+ years 1 building 80+ years 1 building almost 100 years old (1917)
18
Starting Questions
Why are we asking voters for money?
What are we planning on doing with the voters’ money?
How do we get community support?
19
Where to Start?
Board and Superintendent early focus - Establish Unity – Develop a central team – Community Facilitation Team
(Team includes: Board members, administrators, teachers, and diverse community representatives.)
Invest in consultants (JSD117 utilized the professional services of BLDD Architects and Unicom ARC)
Empower and direct Facilitation Team with an official “Charge from the Board” (Approved November 2013)
20
IMPORTANT POINT 1
Do not attempt to pass the Sales Tax unless you can show the voters that the money is needed!
JSD117 was in dire need of this revenue source, but we needed to demonstrate our need.
21
IMPORTANT POINT 2
Focus on developing unified, community support of the facility improvement plan – NOT on the money!
Show the voters what you will do with their money!
Previous JSD117 efforts had disagreement amongst supporters on how to spend the money.
Many people voted no because they couldn’t support the plan, not because they didn’t want to invest in schools.
Phase II:
Pre-Referendum
Community Engagement and Visioning
22
Facilitation Team
23
10 diverse community members, 2 teachers, 2 board members, 3 district administrators
3 Community chair leaders Utilized professional consultants 10 total meetings: November 2013 – June 2014 Subject to Open Meetings Act First Tasks:
– Formalize the structure of the process– Create a Brand– Develop a list of possible improvement scenarios – Prepare for large community engagement events
Community Engagement Process
Four large community engagement events– Jan, Feb, March, April 2014– Average attendance over 200 community members– Structured: Community chair, architect, and Superintendent
presentations– Work activities for community members with small group reports– Data from each event analyzed by Facilitation Team – No “open mic” events
Professional political phone survey Vision117.com and Vision117 Facebook
24
Branding
25
Very important to create a brand for the process First Facilitation Team meeting included lengthy
brainstorming session Team chose:
“Vision117: Honoring Our Past – Looking to Our Future” Focused on Jacksonville’s proud educational history
“Athens of the West”
Brand
26
Improvement Scenarios
Facilitation Team originally developed 21 possible improvement scenarios.
Scenarios underwent a thorough analysis including:– Physical needs assessment– Educational adequacy of each building using national standards– Cost/Benefit ratio for each scenario
Following analysis, 21 scenarios reduced to 11
27
Improvement Scenarios
Larger community engagement examined 11 scenarios– Received input from political phone polling and community
engagement sessions – Included possible funding limitations (Money was not discussed until the 3rd community engagement
session)
Scenarios reduced to final 5 that fit within budget that could be supported by community
Further community input helped develop final Facilitation Team recommendation presented to the Board of Education in June, 2014
28
District Role
District developed the Vision117.com webpage to regularly update and communicate with the community:– Pictures of the condition of the buildings– Explanation of the impact of having zero DSEB– Timeline of Jacksonville’s proud educational history– Explanation of the sales tax law– FAQ– Clarified misrepresentations – Much more
(The original pages have been moved to the “Archive” heading.)
Superintendent took active community role prior to issue being placed on ballot.
29
30
IMPORTANT POINT 3a
Commit to an extensive, structured community engagement process!
Show the voters what you will do with their money.
31
IMPORTANT POINT 3b
Utilize professional consultants for both:1. a structured process, and
2. physical needs and educational adequacy assessments.
The Vision117 process worked because it was very structured, focused, and included objective data.
32
IMPORTANT POINT 4
Develop a brand!
Vision117 has become its own “entity” defining the partnership between the district and community focused on school and community improvement.
33
IMPORTANT POINT 5
Have a smart final plan!
The final plan of Vision117 was the only plan that had a positive impact on everyone, fixed a building with extreme need, and fit within the budget.
34
IMPORTANT POINT 6
Don’t be frightened of social media, use it to your advantage!
The intense communication through Facebook and Vision117.com were instrumental in the success of this process.
35
IMPORTANT POINT 7
On a personal level, be willing to compromise!
The final plan was not what most of the Facilitation Team wanted when the process began, but everyone was in agreement in the end.
36
IMPORTANT POINT 8
Overall, develop trust between community and district!
Communication and transparency helped develop trust between the district and the community.
Phase III:
Referendum:
Community Campaign
37
38
Separate Entities
Once the issue is on the ballot: Things Change! The community efforts, including fund raising must be
driven by community members. (No district involvement) Public Funds are NOT allowed to be used to support a
proposition on a ballot. – Superintendents are considered “on duty” 24 hours a day. – Board members can be involved with referendum as community
members only!
(See 9-25.1 of Election Code: Election Interference)
39
Community Committee
40
Community Committee
Structure– Leadership– Meetings
Fundraising– Personal donations– Corporate donations
Game Plan– Radio– Signs– Facebook– Community Blitz
41
District Role
Maintained Vision117.com website– Factual information including answering misrepresentations
Superintendent gave weekly tours of junior high to show physical state of building
Maintained community presence – Factual information only
Kept in regular contact with attorney to ensure that communication never “crossed the line” into election interference
42
IMPORTANT POINT 9
Don’t be frightened of communicating during the election period, but only give factual information! (Talk to your attorney on a regular basis)
The district continued to present data and clarify misrepresentations after the sales tax was on the ballot.
43
Result
In November, 2014 Morgan County voters passed the CSFST with
60% yes votes!
Phase IV:
Post CSFST Referendum:
Bond Sale
44
45
Bond Sale Considerations
The District’s number one financing goal was to achieve the lowest cost of capital– A secondary goal was to make bonds available to Jacksonville
residents, who supported the CSFST referendum
The District’s financial advisor, PMA Securities sent a Request for Proposal to several underwriters
After thorough review of the proposals, PMA recommended that the District select a team of three underwriters to sell its bonds to investors
46
Underwriting Team
The three underwriters had various strengths:– Firm one:
Sold bonds to retail (individual) investors– Primary focus on Jacksonville residents
Had four brokerage offices in Jacksonville– Firm two:
Sold bonds to retail investors– Firm three:
Sold bonds to larger institutional investors (banks, insurance companies, etc.)
Jacksonville residents were given first priority for retail orders, followed by other Illinois residents and then out-of-state individuals
47
Conduit Issuer
The District also decided to sell its bonds through a conduit issuer– Western Illinois Economic Development Authority (WIEDA)
By purchasing bonds through WIEDA, investors enjoy both state and federal tax exemption on its interest earnings– Results in a lower interest cost for the District than if it sold bonds
on its own (federal tax exemption only)
48
Financing Goals Achieved
The District positioned itself to secure the lowest possible financing cost– Assembled a strong underwriting team who focused on various
types of investors– Sold its bonds through WEIDA
Jacksonville residents had an opportunity to purchase the District’s bonds – “Full circle” community support for the District’s projects
49
District Update
The Facilitation Team (Vision117 Committee) was reconvened to discuss how to use the excess proceeds from the bond sale
This spring we will renovate our first elementary school The community is getting more than the initial plan they
supported We are working on Phase II
50
IMPORTANT POINT 10
Hire an outstanding Municipal Advisor and Law Firm to help with your bond sale!
PMA and Chapman & Cutler have been amazing assets in helping to secure our maximum funding.
51
IMPORTANT POINT 11
Keep communicating after the election!
Trust between the community and the district will be critical for future phases of Vision117.
Lessons Learned
52
Q&A
53
This document has been prepared by Chapman and Cutler LLP attorneys for informational purposes
only. It is general in nature and based on authorities that are subject to change. It is not intended as
legal advice. Accordingly, readers should consult with, and seek the advice of, their own counsel with
respect to any individual situation that involves the material contained in this document, the
application of such material to their specific circumstances, or any questions relating to their own
affairs that may be raised by such material.
© 2015 Chapman and Cutler LLP
54
The information contained herein is solely intended to suggest/discuss potentially applicable financing applications and is not intended to be a specific buy/sell recommendation, nor is it an official confirmation of terms. Any terms discussed herein are preliminary until confirmed in a definitive written agreement. Any portion of this presentation prepared by persons not affiliated with PMA is solely the responsibility of such preparer and PMA disclaims all responsibility for such information.
The analysis or information presented herein is based upon hypothetical projections and/or past performance that have certain limitations. No representation is made that it is accurate or complete or that any results indicated will be achieved. In no way is past performance indicative of future results. Changes to any prices, levels, or assumptions contained herein may have a material impact on results. Any estimates or assumptions contained herein represent our best judgment as of the date indicated and are subject to change without notice. Examples are merely representative and are not meant to be all-inclusive.
The information set forth herein was gathered from sources which we believe, but do not guarantee, to be accurate. Neither the information, nor any options expressed, constitute a solicitation by us for purposes of sale or purchase of any securities or commodities. Investment/financing decisions by market participants should not be based on this information.
You should consider certain economic risks (and other legal, tax, and accounting consequences) prior to entering into any type of transaction with PMA Securities, Inc. or PMA Financial Network, Inc. It is imperative that any prospective client perform its own research and due diligence, independent of us or our affiliates, to determine suitability of the proposed transaction with respect to the aforementioned potential economic risks and legal, tax, and accounting consequences. Our analyses are not and do not purport to be appraisals of the assets, or business of the District or any other entity. PMA makes no representations as to the actual value which may be received in connection with a transaction nor the legal, tax, or accounting effects of consummating a transaction. PMA cannot be relied upon to provide legal, tax, or accounting advice. You should seek out independent and qualified legal, tax, and accounting advice from outside sources. This information has been prepared for informational and educational purposes and does not constitute a solicitation to purchase or sell securities, which may be done only after client suitability is reviewed and determined.
Securities, public finance and institutional brokerage services are offered through PMA Securities, Inc. PMA Securities, Inc. is a broker-dealer and municipal advisor registered with the SEC and MSRB, and is a member of FINRA and SIPC. Prudent Man Advisors, Inc., an SEC registered investment adviser, provides investment advisory services to local government investment pools. All other products and services are provided by PMA Financial Network, Inc. PMA Financial Network, Inc., PMA Securities, Inc. and Prudent Man Advisors (collectively “PMA") are under common ownership. Securities and public finance services offered through PMA Securities, Inc. are available in CA, CO, FL, GA, IL, IN, IA, KS, MI, MN, MO, NE, OH, OK, PA, SD, TX and WI. This document is not an offer of services available in any state other than those listed above, has been prepared for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute a solicitation to purchase or sell securities, which may be done only after client suitability is reviewed and determined. All investments mentioned herein may have varying levels of risk, and may not be suitable for every investor. For more information, please visit us at www.pmanetwork.com.
© 2015 PMA Securities, Inc. For institutional use only.
Disclaimer
55