a confrontation with

29
Gerard ’t Hooft, Nobel Lecture 1999 infinity

Upload: gizi

Post on 25-Feb-2016

42 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

A Confrontation with. infinity. Gerard ’t Hooft, Nobel Lecture 1999. What does Renormalizability Mean ???. Understanding Small Distance Behavior !!. The Differential Equation. Discretized Space and Time. Continuous space and Time. -. +. Bare - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: A  Confrontation  with

Gerard ’t Hooft, Nobel Lecture 1999

infinity

Page 2: A  Confrontation  with

q

k q

k

42 2 2 2

1d ( )(( ) )

kk m k q m

Page 3: A  Confrontation  with

What does Renormalizability

Mean ???

Understanding SmallDistance Behavior !!

Page 4: A  Confrontation  with

The Differential Equation

= velocityxt

dxdt

Page 5: A  Confrontation  with

Discretized Space and Time

Continuous space and Time

Page 6: A  Confrontation  with

Mass and Charge Renormalization

Bare Charge

BareMass

ObservedCharge

ObservedMass

0

+

-

+

-

Page 7: A  Confrontation  with

Bare Charge

ObservedCharge

BareMass

ObservedMass

Keeping the Observed Properties Fixed

+

-

Page 8: A  Confrontation  with

All problems with renormalizing infinities can

be resolved by considering

of our theory(ies)

The Small Distance Limit

Page 9: A  Confrontation  with

The scale transformation

gg´

when particles are quantized ...

Page 10: A  Confrontation  with

Scaling and Dimensions4Examples: theory

410 210 1 210

distance scale

2, e

2and: Electro-magnetism, e

Page 11: A  Confrontation  with

Negative screening: Yang-Mills gauge theory

410 210 1 210

distance scale

2g

Page 12: A  Confrontation  with

Chiral theories:These are theories in which a field

has a fixed length:

Field strength

Page 13: A  Confrontation  with

Compare large distance with small distance:

At large distance scales, thecurvature is weak near linearity = weak interactions

At small distances, strongcurvature strong interactions

The quantum fluctuations at small distancein such a theory undermine its own structure.

Its small-distance behaviour is ILL-DEFINED

Page 14: A  Confrontation  with

Some theories have BAD short distance behaviour:

210 1 210

Page 15: A  Confrontation  with

Spontaneous symmetry breaking( left - right symmetry )

At short distancescales, our particle

theory lookslike this

At large distancescales, the situationis as described here

This degree offreedom corresponds to

the Higgs particle

Page 16: A  Confrontation  with

Breaking Rotational Symmetry

Now THIS becomes an essential degree

of freedomAnd THIS is theHiggs degree of

Freedom

Page 17: A  Confrontation  with

If there were no HIGGS particle in ourtheory, then the “Mexican Hat” would

be infinitely steep, or:

HiggsM This is exactly like the situation in a

“chiral field theory”:2 2F

Such a theory is ill-defined, since itssmall-distance structure runs out of control...

Page 18: A  Confrontation  with

How does force depend on distance ?

Weak:

Strong:

Strong

EMWeak

x

Force

q q

Electro-magnetic:

0

Page 19: A  Confrontation  with

Leptons

Quarks

Generation I Generation II Generation IIIThe Standard Model

Gauge Bosons g

us s

e

u

c

c

b b

b b

t t

0Z

dt

cs

e

u

c t

b

s

W

du t

W

e

u

c t

d

Graviton

L L L

e

u

d

cs

d

s b

dHiggs

L L L

R R R

RRR

Page 20: A  Confrontation  with

CERN

SpS&

LEP* *

Page 21: A  Confrontation  with

Linear Accelerator

Fermilablinear booster

Page 22: A  Confrontation  with

A symmetric object can be slightly out of equilibrium …

Page 23: A  Confrontation  with

An asymmetric equilibrium is unnatural ...

Page 24: A  Confrontation  with

Running Coupling Strengths

*

**

***

*

**

***

strongg

Elect-MagneWeakg

*

*

*

310 610 910 1210 1510 18101 GeV

1

0.5

Page 25: A  Confrontation  with

Super symmetric theories

strongg

Elect-MagneWeakg

*

*

*

*

**

*

**

*

**

***

310 610 910 1210 1510 18101 GeV

1

0.5

Page 26: A  Confrontation  with

Are strings continuous or are they discrete

at tiny distance scales ?

Super String Theory

Page 27: A  Confrontation  with

Otherwise, it is likely toexplode ….

A theory can only be successfulif we understand completelyhow its dynamical variables

behave at the tiniest possibletime- and distance scales

Page 28: A  Confrontation  with
Page 29: A  Confrontation  with

Otherwise, it is likely toexplode ….

With thanks to:

M. Veltman (teaching)C.T. de Laat (animation)

my wife and the rest of my family (support)many other physicists

and the Royal SwedishAcademy of Sciences