a comparative analysis of international frameworks natalie pareja roblin ghent university (belgium)...

24
21 st century competences A comparative analysis of international frameworks Natalie Pareja Roblin Ghent University (Belgium) Joke Voogt University of Twente (The Netherlands)

Upload: britney-cummings

Post on 17-Dec-2015

231 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

21st century competences

A comparative analysis of international frameworks

Natalie Pareja RoblinGhent University (Belgium)

Joke VoogtUniversity of Twente (The Netherlands)

Mass producti

on

Society has changed from an industrial society…

Knowledge

…to a knowledge society

Drivers for change

Changes in economy and labor market

Increase in demand for people with (formal) high and medium qualifications

Jobs occupied by highly qualified people are expected to rise by 16 million between 2010 and 2020 (European Commission)

By 2020, knowledge and skills intensive jobs (e.g. managers, professionals ) will represent more than 42% of total employment (Cedefop)

Changes in economy and labor market

Increase in demand for people with (formal) high and medium qualifications

Students need to be prepared for jobs that do not yet exist

The most demanded jobs in 2010 did not exist in 2004 (US Secretary of Education)

Changes in the way we live, learn, work

Need for new competences

Key competences

21st century learning

21st century skills

Life long learning competences

Knowledge, skills and attitudes

Frameworks for 21st century competences

Research questions and goals

21st century competences

What are 21st century competences?

ICT Competences

What are 21st century competences?

Implementation of 21st century competences

Implementation: Approaches

Implementation: 21st century learning

Aspect Traditional pedagogy

Less…

Emergent pedagogy for knowledge society

More…

Active Activities prescribed by teacher

Whole class instruction Little variation Pace determined by the

program

Activities determined by learners

Small groups Differentiation Pace determined by

learners

Collaborative

Individual Homogeneous groups

Working in teams Heterogeneous groups

Creative Reproductive learning Apply known solutions to

problems

Productive learning Find new solutions to

problems

Integrative No link between theory and practice

Separate subjects Discipline based

Strong theory and practice links

Relations between subjects Thematic(Adapted from Voogt, 2003)

Assessment of 21st century competences

Largely performance-based

Enable the collection of multiple types of information about learners’ performance (e.g. outcomes, processes, rationales).

Focused on accountability (assessment of learning) as well as on productive and useful feedback (assessment for learning)

Flexible and responsive to new developments

Meets the criteria of good assessments (i.e., fair, valid, part of a comprehensive assessment system)

Stakeholders

Challenges

How can 21st century competences be operationalized? What should students learn at different age levels in terms of knowledge, skills and attitudes?

How are 21st century competences connected to core subjects?

What is the role of formal and informal education in facilitating the acquisition of 21st century competences?

How can the use of ICT promote the mastery of 21st century competences?

Further steps...

Create awareness: stimulate public debate among

various stakeholders

Encourage collaboration and networking

Establish stronger connections between formal and informal learning

Create ownership among teachers and provide them

with professional development opportunities

Build on already existing (good) practices

Research

“It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the

most intelligent that survives. It is the one that is the most adaptable to change”

Charles Darwin