a come adrenalina ed - italian resuscitation council (irc) · • somministra adrenalina e...
TRANSCRIPT
A come Adrenalina edAmiodarone: quali farmaci?
Claudio Sandroni
ILCOR ALS Task Force - ERC ALS Science and Education Committee
Chair, ESICM Trauma and Emergency Medicine Section
COI
• Co-author, ERC guidelines, Advanced Life Support 2015
• Co-author, ERC guidelines on Post-Resuscitation Care, 2015
EPINEPHRINE
Coronary perfusion pressure (CPP)
ROSC only when CPP≥15 mmHg
Paradis NA. JAMA 1990; 263: 1106-13
# 100 pts
Epinephrine
• It increases coronary blood flow– Michael JR et al. Circulation 1984;69:822-35
– Brown CG et al. Circulation 1987;75:491-7
• It increases cerebral blood flow– Michael JR et al. Circulation 1984;69:822-35
– Burnett AM et al. Resuscitation 2012; 83:1021–24
• Microcirculation?
Epinephrine: – Increases arterial
pressure
– Decreases cerebral microcirculation
– Decreases oxygen pressure (PbO2) inside cerebral tissue
Ristagno G et al Crit Care Med 2009;37:1408-15
Hagihara A et al, JAMA. 2012;307(11):1161-116
Nakahara S et al BMJ 2013;347:f6829
(9058 pairs)
(1990 pairs)
• Randomised trial, non-traumatic OHCA
• 851 adult patients
• Intervention:– ALS with drugs
– ALS with no drugs (1st venous access 5’ after ROSC)
• Strict control of CPR quality
Olasveengen, JAMA 2009; 302:2222-9
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
ROSC Alive @ ICU Discharge 1 year
No drugs Drugs
p<0.001
p=0.002
NSNS
Olasveengen, JAMA 2009; 302:2222-9
However
• Not blinded
• Not only epinephrine
– Antiarrhythmics
– Atropine
Olasveengen, JAMA 2009; 302:2222-9
“Do i.v. adrenaline use risks in cardiac arrestoutweigh benefit?”
Perkins GD et al. N Engl J Med. 2018; 379:711-721
“In a trial, the standard dose of adrenaline should be compared with which of the following?”
Perkins GD et al. N Engl J Med. 2018; 379:711-721
• 8014 adult OHCA in UK
• Epinephrine vs. placebo (double-blinded)
• Primary outcome: survival @30 days
• Secondary outcome: discharge w/mRS 1-3
Perkins GD et al. N Engl J Med. 2018; 379:711-721
modified Rankin Score (mRS)
Score Definition
0 No symptoms
1 No significant disability. Able to carry out all usual activities, despite some symptoms
2 Slight disability. able to look after own affairs without assistance, but unable to carry out all previous activities
3 Moderate disability. Requires some help, but able to walk unassisted
4 Moderately severe disability. Unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance, and unable to walk unassisted
5 Severe disability. Requires constant nursing care and attention, bedridden, incontinent
6 Dead
Results
Epinephrine
(n= 4015)36.3% 3.2% 2.2%
Placebo
(n= 3999)11.7% 2.4% 1.9%
ROSC 30-d survival 30-d mRS 1-3
OR 1.47 (1.09–1.97) OR 1.19 (0.85–1.68)p <0.001
Perkins GD et al. N Engl J Med. 2018; 379:711-721
Epinephrine: benefits?
• Significant increase of survival to discharge– Quantitatively modest (0.8%)
– NNT = 113
• Nonsignificant increase of survival with good neurological outcome– Higher rate of poor neurological outcome in
survivors
Perkins GD et al. N Engl J Med. 2018; 379:711-721
Good neurological outcome Survival
Perkins GD et al. N Engl J Med. 2018; 379:711-721
Future sub-studies
• Timing of epinephrine
• Administration route
• Cost analysis
Perkins GD et al. N Engl J Med. 2018; 379:711-721
ILCOR Statement: Vasopressors• We recommend administration of epinephrine during CPR
– (strong recommendation, low to moderate certainty of evidence).
• For PEA/asystole, we recommend administration of epinephrine as soon as feasible during CPR – (strong recommendation, very low certainty of evidence).
• For VF/pVT, we suggest administration of epinephrine after initial defibrillation attempts are unsuccessful during CPR– (weak recommendation, very low certainty of evidence).
www.costr.ilcor.orgMarch 21, 2019
ANTIARRHYTHMICS
In caso di FV / TV refrattaria
• Somministra adrenalina e amiodarone 300 mg dopoil 3° shock
• In alternativaall’amiodarone: lidocaina1-1,5 mg/kg
RCP per 2 minuti
RCP per 2 minuti
durante RCPAdrenalina 1 mg ev
Amiodarone 300 mg ev
Eroga 2° shock
Eroga 3° shock
• Double-blind RCT (ALPS trial) in VF/pVT OHCA
• Shock-resistant (≥1) VF/pVT were randomised (1:1:1):
•Amiodarone (Nexterone®) 300 mg (+ 150)
•Lidocaine 120 mg (+ 60)
•Placebo
• Primary endpoint: survival to discharge
•Secondary endpoint: survival to discharge with good mRS
Kudenchuck PJ. et al., NEJM 2016;374:1711-22.
ALPS trial: characteristics
• Captisol-enabled amiodarone (Nexterone® Baxter)– To avoid the haemodynamic effects of Polysorbate-80
• Either i.v. or i.o. administration route
• Powered to detect a 6% absolute difference between amiodarone and placebo– 3000 patients needed
Kudenchuck PJ. et al., NEJM 2016;374:1711-22.
ALPS trial: key process variables
Kudenchuck PJ. et al., NEJM 2016;374:1711-22.
Results
Amiodarone
(n= 974)35.9% 24.4% 18.8%
Lidocaine
(n= 993)39.9% 23.7% 17.5%
Placebo
(n= 1059)35.6% 21.0% 16.6%
ROSC Survival 2HD HD mRS 1-3
Kudenchuck PJ. et al., NEJM 2016;374:1711-22.
Rates of hospital admission
n = 3026
Kudenchuck PJ. et al., NEJM 2016;374:1711-22.
Rates of survival to discharge
n = 3026
Kudenchuck PJ. et al., NEJM 2016;374:1711-22.
Limitations
• Underpowered
• Predicted absolute difference in survival to discharge 6.3%; actual 3.4%)
• ≈ 9,000 patients needed
• Generalisability?
• Nexterone used instead of Amiodarone
• Drugs used after 1 unsuccessful shock
• Survival according to administration route?Kudenchuck PJ. et al., NEJM 2016;374:1711-22.
Survival according to administration route
route
Kudenchuck PJ. et al., NEJM 2016;374:1711-22.
rou
te
ALPS trial: conclusions
• In patients with VF/pVT resistant to ≥1 shock, both amiodarone and lidocaine are associated with increased survival to hospital admission as compared to placebo
• There is a non-significant trend towards increased survival to discharge as well
• Amiodarone ≡ Lidocaine
Kudenchuck PJ. et al., NEJM 2016;374:1711-22.
ILCOR COSTR: Antiarrhythmics
• We suggest the use of amiodarone or lidocaine in adults with shock refractory ventricular fibrillation/pulseless ventricular tachycardia (VF/pVT)
– (weak recommendation, low quality evidence).
www.costr.ilcor.orgFebruary 25, 2019
• The ILCOR CoSTR suggests that any beneficial effects of amiodarone or lidocaine are similar.
• This ERC update does not make any major changes to the recommendations for the use of antiarrhythmic drugs during advanced life support for shock refractory cardiac arrest.
Soar J et al. Resuscitation 2019; 134:99-103
Conclusions
• Epinephrine increases survival to discharge
– Trend towards better neurological outcome
• Both amiodarone and lidocaine increase ROSC
– No effect on good neurological survival
• Both trials underpowered
– No reason to change guidelines for now