a century of fed failure - mises circle 2010

46
A Century of Failure: The Case for Ending the Fed

Upload: torkill

Post on 22-Nov-2014

535 views

Category:

Education


0 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: A Century of FED Failure - Mises Circle  2010

A Century of Failure:

The Case for Ending the Fed

Page 2: A Century of FED Failure - Mises Circle  2010
Page 3: A Century of FED Failure - Mises Circle  2010
Page 4: A Century of FED Failure - Mises Circle  2010
Page 5: A Century of FED Failure - Mises Circle  2010
Page 6: A Century of FED Failure - Mises Circle  2010

the fed’s mission

• To “Promote effectively the goals of maximum employment, stable prices, and moderate long-term interest rates.” • To “contain financial disruptions and [prevent] their spread outside the financial sector.”

Page 7: A Century of FED Failure - Mises Circle  2010
Page 8: A Century of FED Failure - Mises Circle  2010

“”””’’“Stable prices allow people to rely on the dollar as a measure of value when making long-term contracts, engaging in long-term planning, or borrowing or lending for long period.”

Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke

Page 9: A Century of FED Failure - Mises Circle  2010

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

Consumer Price Index, 1790-2009

Page 10: A Century of FED Failure - Mises Circle  2010
Page 11: A Century of FED Failure - Mises Circle  2010

Jan-14

Jan-19

Jan-24

Jan-29

Jan-34

Jan-39

Jan-44

Jan-49

Jan-54

Jan-59

Jan-64

Jan-69

Jan-74

Jan-79

Jan-84

Jan-89

Jan-94

Jan-99

Jan-04

Jan-09-20

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

U.S. Monthly Inflation, 1914-2009

Axis Title

Page 12: A Century of FED Failure - Mises Circle  2010
Page 13: A Century of FED Failure - Mises Circle  2010
Page 14: A Century of FED Failure - Mises Circle  2010
Page 15: A Century of FED Failure - Mises Circle  2010

“A broad historical look finds many more periods of deflation with reasonable growth than with depression, and many more periods of depression with inflation than with deflation.”

Atkeson and Kehoe (AER 2004)

Page 16: A Century of FED Failure - Mises Circle  2010
Page 17: A Century of FED Failure - Mises Circle  2010
Page 18: A Century of FED Failure - Mises Circle  2010
Page 19: A Century of FED Failure - Mises Circle  2010

Percent Deviation of GNP from Trend: Standard Measure

Page 20: A Century of FED Failure - Mises Circle  2010
Page 21: A Century of FED Failure - Mises Circle  2010

Percent Deviation of GNP from Trend: Romer’s Revision

Page 22: A Century of FED Failure - Mises Circle  2010

Government Outlays as Percent of GDP

Page 23: A Century of FED Failure - Mises Circle  2010
Page 24: A Century of FED Failure - Mises Circle  2010
Page 25: A Century of FED Failure - Mises Circle  2010

“Recessions have not become noticeably shorter over time. The average length of recessions is actually one month longer in the post-World War II era than in the pre-World War I era. There is also no obvious change in the distribution of the length of recessions between the prewar and postwar eras.”

Christina Romer (1999)

Page 26: A Century of FED Failure - Mises Circle  2010
Page 27: A Century of FED Failure - Mises Circle  2010
Page 28: A Century of FED Failure - Mises Circle  2010

Percentage of Output Forecast Error Variance Explained by Supply Shocks

Years Ahead Pre-1914 Post-World War II

1 95 88.66* 5

2 97 83.84* 21

4 98 77.19* 40

10 99 77.00* 68

Sources: Keating and Nye (1998), *Bordo and Redish (2004)

Page 29: A Century of FED Failure - Mises Circle  2010
Page 30: A Century of FED Failure - Mises Circle  2010

“There were no more than three major banking panics between 1873 and 1907, and two incipient banking panics in 1884 and 1890. Twelve years elapsed between the panic of 1861 and the panic of 1873, twenty years between the panics of 1873 and 1893, and fourteen years between 1893 and 1907: three banking panics in half a century! And in only one of the three, 1893, did the number of bank suspensions match those of the Great Depression.”

--Elmus Wicker (2000)

Page 31: A Century of FED Failure - Mises Circle  2010
Page 32: A Century of FED Failure - Mises Circle  2010
Page 33: A Century of FED Failure - Mises Circle  2010
Page 34: A Century of FED Failure - Mises Circle  2010

Willem Buiter: Fed Interventions, including its rescue of Bear Stearns, appear “to have been designed to maximize bad incentives for future reckless lending and borrowing by the institutions affected by them.”

Page 35: A Century of FED Failure - Mises Circle  2010
Page 36: A Century of FED Failure - Mises Circle  2010

I know it will be said that in this work I have pointed out a deep malady, and only suggested a superficial remedy. I have tediously insisted that the natural system of banking is that of many banks keeping their own cash reserve, with the penalty of failure before them if they neglect it. I have shown that our system is that of a single bank keeping the whole reserve under no effectual penalty of failure. And yet I propose to retain that system, and only attempt to mend and palliate it.

Page 37: A Century of FED Failure - Mises Circle  2010

I can only reply that I propose to retain this system because I am quite sure that it is of no manner of use proposing to alter it... You might as well, or better, try to alter the English monarchy and substitute a republic, as to alter the present constitution of the English money market, founded on the Bank of England.

Page 38: A Century of FED Failure - Mises Circle  2010
Page 39: A Century of FED Failure - Mises Circle  2010
Page 40: A Century of FED Failure - Mises Circle  2010
Page 41: A Century of FED Failure - Mises Circle  2010
Page 42: A Century of FED Failure - Mises Circle  2010
Page 43: A Century of FED Failure - Mises Circle  2010
Page 44: A Century of FED Failure - Mises Circle  2010
Page 45: A Century of FED Failure - Mises Circle  2010
Page 46: A Century of FED Failure - Mises Circle  2010