a broad overview (session 1) overview.pdf · source: tti 2011 urban mobility report (dec 2011)...
TRANSCRIPT
TOD – A Broad Overview (Session 1)
Florida’s TOD Framework & Typology (Session 2)
Place Type Methodology & Analysis (Session 3)
Lunch Break
Model Regulations (Session 4)
Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives & Policies (4.1)
BREAK
Land Development Regulations (4.2)
Implementation (Session 5)
Questions & Wrap-Up
2
Session 1
Florida Population :
18.8 Million (2010 est.)
SOURCE: TTI 2011 Urban Mobility Report (Dec 2011)
Florida’s Annual Congestion Costs
REGION HOURS
LOST TOTAL COST
Jacksonville 18M $371 M
Central (Orlando, Tampa)
91 M $1.91 B
Southwest (Cape Coral/Sarasota)
15.6M $319 M
Southeast (PB, Broward, Miami-Dade)
140 M $2.9 B
Annual Costs
to Florida (partial)
265 M Hours!
The Big Questions:
How Will We Settle the Next
10 (or 20) Million Floridians?
… And How Will They Move?
A Paradigm Shift
Predictability?
“Let our advance worrying become advance thinking and planning.” -- Winston Churchill
Is Green on the Agenda?
Taking Transit to Work is the Best Way
to Reduce Household Carbon Footprint Science Applications International Corporation (2007)
Why Transit?
For Every $1 Spent on Transit,
There is an $8 Return
(in increased productivity, reduction of fuel consumption,
increased land values, and reduced road construction) SOURCE: Cambridge Systematics
Successful (& Sustainable) Economic Regions
Have Successful Transit
Seattle Research
Triangle
Competitive States
Have Expanding Transit
Texas
Massachusetts
Maryland
North Carolina
Global Competitors ~ Lots of Transit
China ~ Rail Map
Japan ~ Rail Map
European Union ~ Rail Map
France ~ Rail Map Germany ~ Rail Map
What is Transit Oriented Development?
• Development within ¼ to ½-mile of a
“premium” transit station that is:
– Compact; moderate to high density & intensity
– Focuses the highest concentrations of uses within the first ¼- mile
– Contains a strong mix of residential & employment uses
– Maximizes walk access to transit
– Characterized by streetscapes & urban form oriented to the pedestrian
– Minimized parking
– Reduced auto-orientation
Source: A Framework for Transit Oriented Development in Florida
Other Transit/Development Approaches …
Auto-Oriented Transit • 1970s-era early FRA systems
(heavy rail into urban centers)
• Designed to capture commuters
in large suburban park & ride
lots and shuttle them into CBD
Transit-Related Development • Joint Development focus of transit
agency & Federal Government
• “Highest & Best Use” but can be
myopic & miss larger public return
SOURCE:
TOD vs. TAD
• Transit Oriented Development
vs.
• Transit Adjacent Development – Auto-oriented uses – Large surface parking lots – Suburban office campuses – Big-box format retail – Pedestrian unfriendly
–
A Sample of Existing &
Emerging Rail Projects in Florida
BRT Projects
Under Development
Location Project Corridor
Jacksonville Downtown Enhancement Project Broad/Jefferson/Bay/Forsyth
Jacksonville North Corridor BRT Norwood/Lem Turner Blvd
Jacksonville Southeast Corridor BRT Philips Highway (US 1)
Orlando LYMMO Extension Parramore
Orlando East West LYMMO Extension Central Boulevard
Tampa MetroRapid North-South Nebraska/Fletcher Avenues
Sarasota North South BRT Orange/Mound/US 41
More BRT … In the Works
Location Project Corridor Gainesville Blue Line /Santa Fe to Airport Archer Road Miami Dade Metrorail Extension North Corridor Broward Oakland Park Blvd. Oakland Park Blvd Broward University Drive University Drive
Broward Hollywood/Pines Blvd Hollywood/Pines Blvd. (A1A to US 27)
Broward/Palm Beach SR 7/US 441 SR 7/US 441 (Sample Rd. - Glades Rd.)
Palm Beach Glades Road Glades Rd.
Broward Central Broward E-W Transit Sawgrass Expressway to Intracoastal Waterway
Orlando Osceola Corridor US 192 Orlando SR 50 /UCF Connector SR 50
Jacksonville East Corridor BRT Arlington Expressway/Southside Blvd/Beach Blvd
Jacksonville Southwest Corridor BRT Blanding Boulevard Tallahassee Tennessee Street US 90/Mahan/Tennessee St
Pinellas County Pinellas County AA Howard Frankland/Gateway/St. Pete
Design Features
of a
Well-Planned TOD
• Demographic Suitability
Population, households & employment within … ½-mile Station Area & in larger transit shed
• Streets and Blocks
Designed to provide safe & convenient access to transit stations; continuous sidewalks
Primary focus on pedestrians; cars are secondary
Streets narrow enough to cross easily on foot
Blocks of 400-600 LF with high grid density
Design Features Of Well-Planned TODs
Design Features Of Well-Planned TODs
• Good Mixture of Buildings and Uses
Vertical & horizontal mix of retail, office,
restaurants, residential & others
Creates 18 hours of daily activity
“Eyes on the Street” provides natural surveillance
Design Features Of Well-Planned TODs
• Building Design & Placement
Properly located buildings create walkable streets & sense of enclosure
Active uses along ground floors
Continuous “pedestrian itinerary” without large tracts of vacant land or surface parking lots
Building fronts face other fronts; transition at rear property lines; windows & doors at street edge
Design Features Of Well-Planned TODs
• Proper Parking Placement & Treatment
Reduced parking & restricted (not oversupplied)
Shared & structured parking (design & economics)
Located to create pedestrian patrons for businesses
• Additional Considerations
Tie-in with other transit modes
Public open space
Civic & cultural uses
TOD
Winter Park, Florida
TAD
Pompano Beach, Florida
TOD is Not a “One-Size-Fits-All”
• Transit type
• Center type
• Mix of uses
• Intensity level
34 Source: A Framework for Transit Oriented Development in Florida
TOD Typologies
Different Transit “Technologies”
Intercity Passenger Rail (Amtrak)
Commuter Rail (SunRail; Tri-Rail)
Trolley or Streetcar
High Speed Rail
Bus Rapid Transit Light Rail Local/Regional Bus
SOURCE: Todd Litman, Victoria Transport Policy Institute
Not All Transit is Created Equal
Rail & Bus
Travel Impacts
(1) TOD programs must fit local
needs (consider transit
network, market factors &
TOD track-record)
(2) TOD financial assistance is
one piece of a complex puzzle
(3) Should strongly consider
workforce/affordable housing
in TOD to avoid unintended
exclusion of lower income
persons
Financing TOD
Financing TOD
SOURCE: CTOD
LEGEND
VALUE BEFORE TRANSIT INVESTMENT
Financing TOD
SOURCE: CTOD
LEGEND
VALUE BEFORE TRANSIT INVESTMENT
VALUE AFTER TRANSIT INVESTMENT
Value Capture
Implementation Complexities
Source: CTOD
TOD Overview Summary
• Transportation System is Evolving – Limited Options for Expansion
– Increased Focus on Transit
• Transit Oriented Development – National Examples
– Variations in Application
– Urban Design Guidelines
• TOD Typology Examples – Differing Scales & Contexts
– Range of Nomenclature
• Financing Options
Session 1