Ma

Cos

C

Co

Wh

Bu

Re

Ou

FA

Re

y 2011 By Gro

st of Energy (Co

Cost

ontents

hy focus on

uilding block

Costs of

educing cost

ur energy fut

AQ

eferences

oup Governmen

oE), Global

t of

cost of ener

ks of cost of e

f different po

t of energy

ture

nt Relations

f En

rgy

energy

ower source

nerg

es

gy

2 

2 

3 

5 

6 

7 

7 

This issue b

information

the five Ves

of Energy.

brief provides

n on the topics

stas videos ad

more

s discussed in

ddressing Cos

n

st

Ma

Cos

W

Eve

lim

like

cos

bus

eco

pro

As

bec

to b

ene

get

fut

ma

B

Cos

ind

the

Di

CA

The

cos

the

get

“Thgenpersig

Dav

OP

The

and

dril

y 2011 By Gro

st of Energy (Co

Why f

eryone needs e

ited resources

e fossil fuels. Ev

st of energy ma

siness, for crea

onomic growth.

osperity.

a society, we ru

cause we don’t

be in the future

ergy choices co

t the most powe

ure. How do we

de? We focus o

Buildi

st of energy con

irect. When cho

e direct and the

rect costs

PEX

e capital expen

sts associated w

e cost of capital

t funding.

he influence of ineration cannorcentage point

gnificant effect

vid Milborrow, Wi

EX

e operating cos

d, for some ene

lling/mining an

oup Governmen

oE), Global

focus

energy, and gen

and in many ca

veryone and ev

atters for the co

ting and maint

. If energy is too

un risks in plan

know what the

e. We need to lim

ompared to the

er out of our inv

e ensure that th

on the cost of e

ng bl

nsists of many

oosing our pow

e indirect costs

s

nditure (CAPEX

with building a

l, that is, the int

interest rates oot be over-empht change in the p

on the end pric

indpower Month

sts (OPEX) cove

ergy forms, the c

nd transporting

nt Relations

s on c

nerating energy

ases limited na

verything requi

ompetitiveness

aining local job

o expensive, it

ning our future

e cost of energy

mit the risks as

current energy

vestment both

he best energy

energy.

locks

building block

wer sources, we

of energy into

X), or initial cost

power plant. It

terest rate you

on the cost of whasized. […] A sproject interestce of the electri

ly article in 2010

er operations a

cost of fuel (pu

g the fuel used a

cost o

y consumes

tural resources

res energy. The

s of local

bs, and for

limits growth a

e energy supply

y or fuel is going

ssociated with o

y mix. We need

today and in th

choices are

s of co

s, both direct a

should take bo

account.

t, covers all the

t also includes

have to pay to

wind power single t rate has a icity produced.”

0

and maintenanc

rchasing or

at the power

of ene

s

e

and

y

g

our

to

he

If

su

alt

en

W

It

pl

th

ost o

and

oth

”

ce,

pl

em

Th

co

en

Co

“Pmnuspin

“Tanchco

So20

ergy

we want to sec

upply in the futu

ternatives – we

nergy mix.

What is cost of e

is the total cos

ant, and includ

he power plant.

f ene

ant), purchasin

mits greenhous

he potential pri

ost to society, a

nergy costs for

osts are projec

Pinning a singlemeaningless exe

umber of operapeeds on wind p

nfluence of inter

The precise costnd wind] depenharacteristics oost of financing

ources: David Mil010 (respectively

ure a more stab

ure, we have to

e need to includ

energy?

t of generating

es the cost of b

ergy

ng carbon perm

se gases, and st

ce volatility of

s the risk of lar

all.

ct specific

e figure to the coercise given theating cost variabpower economirest rates on pr

st competitivenends more than aof each particulag as well as CO2

borrow, Windpowy)

ble and sustain

o look into bette

de wind energy

g 1 kWh of pow

building, fueling

mits for fossil fu

toring waste.

some fuel type

rge price fluctu

cost of wind powe range of insta

ables, the strongmics and the equ

roject financing

ness [of nuclear,anything on thelar market and t

2 and fossil fuel

wer Monthly artic

nable energy

er long term

y in our future

wer from a powe

g and operating

el energy that

es can also hav

ations increase

wer is a alled costs, the g influence of w

ually strong g.”

r, coal, gas, hydre local their associatel prices.”

cle in 2010, IEA

er

g

e a

es

wind

dro

ed

In

The

cos

Mo

the

Soc

Am

– th

the

a p

Env

Am

air

nat

in p

Clim

The

pla

effe

and

cos

wat

Est

The

or t

exi

cos

The

cyccosannconcoacom$1

due

the

of c

SouPro

direct cos

e indirect costs

sts are often div

ost of the indire

e owners of the

cial costs

mong the social

he cost of hosp

e emissions from

ower plant.

vironmental co

mong the enviro

pollution and w

ture areas, and

power plants, im

mate change

e costs of clima

nt emissions a

ects of climate

d the environm

sts of rebuilding

ter and food sh

timating indire

ere are many un

the avoided cos

sting research

sts of energy, so

e U.S. National

cle effects of costing the U.S. punually. […] Acconservatively doal per kWh genempetitive.” The

78.4/MWh, wh

e to difficulty in

ey go on and sta

coal are thus fa

urce: Hidden Costduction and Use

sts

s are many and

vided into socia

ct costs of ene

power plants b

costs we can n

pitals, doctor vis

m a power plan

osts

onmental costs

waste – pollutin

also the cost o

mpacting both t

ate change as a

ffect both soci

change range

ent to global ch

g, of lost econo

hortages, of hig

ect costs

ncertainties in

sts of fossil-fue

suggests thes

ometimes man

Academy of Sc

oal and the waspublic a third to counting for theoubles to triples

nerated, makingir estimated va

hich does not re

n monetizing al

ate that “the truar greater than t

ts of Energy: Unpe, 2010

often hard to q

al and environm

rgy are current

but by citizens a

name the poten

sits and medici

nt, or as a result

we can also na

ng drinking wat

of using fresh w

the environme

a result of fossi

ety and the env

from local chan

hanges and the

omic activity, of

gher insurance p

estimates of th

el power genera

e costs can sur

ny times over.

ciences conclud

ste stream geneover one-half o

e [cumulative] ds the price of el

g wind […] econalue of coal exte

epresent the fu

l the impacts, a

rue ecological athe numbers su

priced Conseque

quantify. Indirec

mental costs.

tly not carried b

and society.

ntial health cost

ine as a result o

t of an accident

ame the costs o

ter, destroying

water for cooling

nt and people.

l fueled power

vironment. The

nges to weathe

e associated

f crop failures a

premiums.

he indirect cost

ation, however,

rpass the direct

des that“the lifeerated are of a trillion dolladamages lectricity from

nomically ernalities is

ll burden of coa

and therefore

and health costsuggest.”

nces of Energy

ct

by

ts

of

t at

of

g

e

er

and

ts

,

t

fe

lars

al

ts

C

W

W

co

wi

(h

re

st

no

wi

so

ex

Th

fa

th

hi

gr

to

So

Costs of di

Wind energy

Wind power, like

ompared to ope

ind energy is m

ow often the po

source among

able and predic

o carbon cost a

ind energy is al

ources in some

xpected.

he pie charts sh

rm. Costs for of

his is offset by h

gher offshore c

rid costs; the tu

otal cost.

ource for both pie

T

Average

Average op

fferent po

most renewab

erating costs, b

most impacted b

ower plant runs

others). While

ctable over lon

nd virtually no

ready competi

cases, and furt

how typical cos

ffshore wind ar

higher energy p

costs are due p

rbines account

e charts EWEA 20

urbine

e cost profile f

Land rent

Insurance

Misc

erating cost p

ower sour

bles, has a high

but the latter ar

by variations in

s, which reflect

the power outp

nger periods. Th

environmenta

itive with conve

ther cost impro

st profiles for an

re higher than f

production in m

primarily to high

t for a smaller p

009, data from 2

for onshore w

Service and spare parts

Administr

Pcellaneous

profile for onsh

ces

initial investm

e low. The cost

n the load facto

s the energy

put is variable i

here is no fuel c

l cost. Onshore

entional power

vements are

n onshore wind

for onshore, bu

most cases. The

her foundation

percentage of t

2006

Grid Connection

Foundatioand Turbin

Set Up

Land Rent

Financial Costs

Project Developmen

ind farm

ration

Power from the grid

hore wind farm

3

ent

t of

r

t is

cost,

d

t

and

the

n ne

t

nt

m

Cos

The

com

tim

con

ava

tra

Com

Due

ma

The

dire

bas

com

ass

cos

cal

and

The

pow

and

in c

ene

Sou

2

3

4

5

6

Co

st $

/MW

h

st of energy va

e cost of energy

mprises a range

me. These value

nditions, by ma

ailable and by t

nsmission syst

mparing power

e to the challen

ny comparison

e benefit of com

ect and indirect

sis for making l

mparison shoul

sumptions for a

sts. When you i

culations, wind

d already is in s

e graph below s

wer sources in 2

d BRICS countr

costs and is bas

ergy are not inc

urce IEA 2010

1

101

201

301

401

501

601

Cost rang

aries…

y is not a fixed

e of values dep

s are affected b

cro-economic f

the structure of

tems.

r sources

nge of monetizi

ns include only t

mparing power

t components i

ong term energ

ld be on a comm

all technologies

nclude all of th

d energy can be

some cases.

shows levelized

2009, based o

ies. The graph

sed only on dire

cluded.

ges for selecte

value for each

pendent on sou

by local politica

factors, by fina

f power market

ing the indirect

the direct cost

sources based

is that it will pro

gy decisions. H

mon basis with

s, based on the

e actual costs

e a competitive

d cost of electr

on data collecte

highlights that

ect costs- the in

ed energy tech

power source b

rce, location an

al and regulato

ncing options

s and

t costs of energ

components.

d on both the

ovide the best

owever, the

the same

full lifetime

into the

power source –

icity from vario

ed from OECD

t large variabilit

ndirect costs of

hnologies

but

nd

ory

gy,

–

ous

ty

f

Th

co

la

th

fo

nu

So

20

EP

ba

da

III

Re

Va

di

co

Fo

ha

in

in

or

lik

Fo

ha

an

he graph below

osts for fossil fu

rge variability h

hat the indirect

ossil fuels and c

uclear energy.

ources: Direct cos

010. Indirect cos

PA 2011, World B

ased on supercrit

ata based on ons

technology.

elative impact

ariations in the

fferent energy

ost structures.

or fossil fuel-ba

ave the largest

crease in the fu

crease by more

r nuclear power

kely rising - fue

ossil fuel-based

ave a price on t

nd that price is

Fossil fuels

A

w shows averag

uels, wind energ

hidden in the d

cost componen

can play a poten

sts compiled from

ts compiled and/

Bank 2011, and

tical coal and CCG

hore wind plants

of different co

direct cost com

technologies in

ased technolog

effect on the le

uel price can ca

e than a third de

r-based power p

l cost, and the f

d power plants

heir emissions

also zero for wi

s Wind

Average directfor selecte

e direct and es

gy and nuclear

ata, however th

nts play a signi

ntially large rol

m EER 2009 and

/or calculated ba

Stern Review 20

GT gas technolog

s. Nuclear data ba

ost components

mponents of en

n unique ways

gies variations i

evelized cost of

ause the cost of

epending on th

plants have a la

fuel cost for wi

will - or potent

of carbon and

ind energy.

d energy

t and indirected energy typ

timated indirec

power. There i

here is little do

ficant role for

le in the case of

d 2010 and IEA

ased on data from

006. Fossil fuel d

gies. Wind energy

ased on generati

s

nergy impact

as a result of th

in the fuel price

f energy. A 50%

f electricity to

he fuel. Fossil fu

asting - and mo

nd is zero.

tially already do

other pollutant

Nuclear

t costs es

Decommission

Social cost

Environmental

OPEX

CAPEX

4

ct

s a

ubt

f

m

data

y

on

heir

e

%

uels

ost

o –

ts,

ning

l cost

R

The

som

ene

Wh

Ves

ene

Thi

typ

are

sta

gua

risk

bla

to t

How

Gov

ene

dev

Ves

A ra

Reduc

e cost of energy

me trends can b

ergy is still falli

hat Vestas is do

stas works in a

ergy through te

is means that w

pe of wind spee

ea is to make th

ble, predictabl

arantees for av

ks further. In th

de and every tu

the installed am

w government

vernments play

ergy by reducin

velopers and ow

stas product p

ange of turbine

Wind speed (m/6

cing c

y for various so

be seen for diff

ng.

oing

focused way to

echnological ad

we make turbin

d and each typ

he power produ

e and efficient

vailability and lo

at way we get t

urbine, lowerin

mount of MW.

ts can help

y an important

ng risks and ind

wners.

ortfolio

es suited to spe

IEC III/s)

6.5

V90 2MW

V100 1.8MW

cost o

ources fluctuat

erent sources.

o continue lowe

dvances in turb

es that are fine

pe of site. Anoth

ction from our t

as possible. Ve

ost production

the most energ

g the cost of en

part in lowerin

direct costs for w

ecific wind spee

7

W

V90

W

V112 3MW

of en

es over time an

The cost of win

ering the cost o

ine technology

ely tuned to eac

her key focus

turbines as

estas gives

thereby reduci

gy out of every

nergy compared

g the cost of

wind project

eds and conditi

7.5

1.8MW

V

W Onshore

nergy

nd

nd

of

y.

ch

ing

d

M

ris

ge

po

re

hi

hi

m

di

ru

co

th

re

wh

In

st

wi

pr

in

bo

ions, customiza

IEC II

8

V60 850 kW

y

any potential r

sk has a cost. R

etting funding,

olitical and regu

gulatory uncer

gher the risk pr

gher the intere

akes it more ex

rect cost of ene

les are for plan

ompensation, fo

hat impact ener

turn on investm

hich lowers the

addition, gove

able support sc

ind energy. Sup

roject more pre

vestment more

orrowing money

able for various

8.5

V52 85

V90 3

isks can impac

isks have an im

and they can b

ulatory uncerta

tainties there a

remium that an

st rate that a b

xpensive to fun

ergy. The cleare

nning and deve

or grid connect

gy projects, the

ment – and the

e final cost of en

rnments can lo

chemes, furthe

pport schemes

dictable, which

e certain. Again

y, which again d

s environments

9

0 kW

3MW

V

V112

ct energy invest

mpact on the in

be reduced by a

ainties: the mor

are around win

n investor will re

bank will deman

nd wind project

er and more tra

loping a projec

tion, and for all

e more certain

lower the cost

nergy.

ower the cost of

er reducing the

can make reve

h make the proj

n, this decrease

decreases the

s and requireme

IEC I

9.5

V80 2MW

V164 7MW

2 3MW Offshore

tments, and ev

terest rates for

ddressing

re political and

d energy, the

equire and the

nd. This higher

s – increasing t

ansparent the

ct, for financial

the other facto

the projected

of project fund

f energy throug

risk of investin

enue from a win

ected return on

es the cost of

cost of energy.

ents.

10

5

ery

r

risk

the

ors

ding,

gh

ng in

nd

n

O

We

ma

tec

on

Red

ren

affo

Bui

pric

pow

car

Oi

D

So

Our en

e keep the cost

king the right d

chnologies and

both the direct

ducing our dep

newable fuels is

ordable energy

ilding a power p

ces in terms of

wer plant is a b

rbon emissions

il price chronol

Dollars per barr

ource: EIA

nergy

of energy low a

decisions now r

what types of f

t and indirect co

endency on lim

s a way to secu

y supply for the

plant today is a

future cost of e

et on future fos

. Fossil fuel cos

ogy 1974-20

el

y futu

and stable in th

regarding what

fuel to rely on. W

omponents of c

mited resources

re a stable, pre

e future.

a bet on future e

energy. Buildin

ssil fuel prices a

sts have remain

11

ure

he future by

t power

We need to foc

cost of energy.

s such as non-

dictable and

energy and fue

g a fossil fueled

and the price o

ned high despit

cus

el

d

f

te

th

wo

re

W

ba

co

an

th

bo

en

su

he financial cris

orld and energy

bound in fuel c

Wind energy is a

ased energy be

ost model imbe

nd virtually no e

he safest bet fo

oth short- and l

nsuring a local,

upply for many

is and resulting

y experts includ

osts due to gro

less risky futu

cause wind ene

dded – there ar

environmental

r our energy fut

ong-term energ

stable, predict

countries.

g deep recessio

ding the IEA wa

owth in develop

re energy inves

ergy has a stab

re no fuel costs

costs. So all in

ture. Including

gy planning wi

table, clean and

on in most of th

arn of a further

ping economies

stment than fu

ble and certain

s, no carbon cos

all, wind energ

wind energy in

ll continue

d affordable po

6

he

s.

el-

sts

y is

n

wer

F

Q

Wbean

Wofpocoenen

Wdiofdi

Hbainw

RSo

EW

IEA

U.S

U.S

U.S

WinMo

FAQ

Question

What’s the diffeetween cost ofnd price of ene

Why use levelizf energy and nower plants foomparing costnergy for varionergy sources?

Why are there ifferences in thf energy calculifferent institu

ow about the alancing and s

ntegration costwind?

Referource

WEA

A

S. EIA

S. NAS

S. NREL

ndpower onthly

A

erence f energy

ergy?

Ththtradege

zed cost new-build or t of ous ?

Wtacopoopth

he cost lated by

utions?

Thsaofchthea

system ts for

LeleBaenat

ence

The Economi

iea.org; Proje

eia.doe.gov;

Hidden Costs

Wind Leveliz

Annual Poweenergy, Augu

Answer

he cost of energhe rates paid foansmission cosemand of poweenerating that e

When comparingakes into accouomparison shouower plants repperating time, w

hose of the sam

here are differeame power souf a power plant hoose differenthey are, the macach situation.

evelized cost ofvel; in order to alancing and synergy. For moret governmentre

s

ics of Wind Ene

ected costs of g

of Energy: Unp

zed Cost of Ene

er Costs Compaust 2010; all by

gy is what it cosr the use of ene

sts, among otheer and the existelectricity.

g power plants nt the full lifeti

uld always be mpresent the coswhich may have

me type.

ences in the estrces because toas net present

t costs and factcro-economic s

f energy can becompare techn

ystem integratie information oelations@vesta

ergy, 2009;

enerating elec

priced Conseque

ergy: A Compar

arison series, Jay David Milborr

sts to actually ergy. The price ers, beyond siming transmissio

the comparisoime costs, rathe

made between st of resources ae changed sign

timates for costo calculate cos value – what t

tors dependingsituation, and th

e used at the innologies, using ion costs are ren this please co

as.com.

tricity 2010 by

ences of Energ

rison of Techni

anuary 2011 arow

generate poweof energy may

mply the cost ofon infrastructu

n should alwayer than the enenew-build powat the time whe

nificantly compa

t of energy pubt of energy, youhose costs wou on the data th

heir assessmen

dividual projecit at the individ

elevant when dontact GR Oper

y OECD/NEA/I

y Production an

ical and Financ

nd January 20

er, whereas the include fees, ta

f energy. The pre – it may not

ys use the levelrgy price at anyer plants, since

en they were buared to new-bu

blished by diffeu need to expreuld be today. Diey have and th

nt of the risks fo

t level or at thedual project leviscussing the srations in Grou

EA;

nd Use, Nationa

cing Input Varia

10; Cutting the

price of energyaxes, grid and rice reflects suexpress the tru

ized cost of eny given time. M

e the costs for euilt and over thuild power plan

erent institutioness the full lifetifferent institut

he accuracy theor each techno

e electricity sysvel makes moresystem-wide co

p Government

al Academy of S

ables, October

e cost of offsho

y refers to

pply and ue cost of

ergy, which Moreover a

existing eir ts, even

ns for the time costs tions may reof, where

ology and

stem-wide e sense. ost of

Relations

Sciences, 2010

2009;

ore wind

7