a and s processes matrix 1 mar 08

1 OF 159

To report problems with any of the links in this document contact HQ AFMC PRODUCT SUPPORT CAMPAIGN DSN 674-2758

TASK DESCRIPTION

IT S

ys

tem

s

TR

IGG

ER

CO

NT

RO

LS

INP

UT

OU

TP

UT

ME

CH

AN

ISM

S

CY

CL

E T

IME

SD

D (

INT

EG

RA

TIO

N)

PL

AN

SU

PP

OR

T

DE

SIG

N S

UP

PO

RT

FIE

LD

SU

PP

OR

T

MA

INT

AIN

PR

OD

UC

TS

IMP

RO

VE

PR

OD

UC

TS

RE

TIR

E P

RO

DU

CT

S

X X

N/A

X X

N/A

X X

N/A

X X

N/A MAJCOM Led Process

X X

N/A DoDI 5000.2

X X

N/A

X X

N/A

X X

N/A

X X

AFI 63-101 Acquisition Led Process

X X

PARTICIPATE IN TEST & EVALUATION STRATEGY N/A Acquisition Led Process

X X

N/A Acquisition Led Process

X X

N/A Acquisition Lead TDS Acquisition Led Process

X X

Acquisition Lead Acquisition Led Process

X X


X X


X X


X X

CONDUCT RISK ASSESSMENT FOR ALTERNATIVES Acquisition Lead Acquisition Led Process

X X

DEVELOP COST ESTIMATE FOR ALTERNATIVES Acquisition Lead Acquisition Led Process

X X


X X


X X


X X


X X

N/A AFI 63-101 Acquisition Led Process

X X


X X

PARTICIPATE IN ACQUISITION STRATEGY REVIEW N/A

X X

N/A Acq Lead

X X

AFMC A4A Product Support [email protected]

OR

G/P

LA

YE

RS

SA

F,

HQ

, L

OG

RE

SO

UR

CE

S

CO

NS

UM

ED

IMP

RO

VE

ME

NT

O

PP

OR

TU

NIT

IES

CO

NC

EP

T

RE

FIN

EM

EN

T

TE

CH

NO

LO

GY

D

EV

EL

OP

ME

NT

SD

D

(DE

MO

NS

TR

AT

ION

)

PR

OD

UC

TIO

N &

D

EP

LO

YM

EN

T

OP

ER

AT

ION

S &

S

UP

PO

RT

DE

TE

RM

INE

S

UP

PO

RT

R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

TS

DE

VE

LO

P &

AC

QU

IRE

S

UP

PO

RT

MA

NA

GE

C

AP

AB

ILIT

IES

ANALYZE MATERIAL SOLUTION TO CAPABILITIES REVIEW AND RISK ASSESSMENT (CRRA) CAPABILITY SHORTFALLS (FSA) (INCLUDE LOGISTICS EXPERTISE ON TEAM)

Enterprise Information Technology Data Repository (EITDR) MAJCOM/Wing

Capabilities Review & Risk Assessment (CRRA) Outputs Identify Capability Gaps

Capabilities Review & Risk Assessment (CRRA) Process

National Military Strategy, Defense Planning Guidance, etc.

AF/A5, MAJCOM Requirements Organizations

Potential Material Solutions for inclusion into Initial Capabilities Document (ICD)

Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) Process

Functional Subject Matter Experts (SME)s Participation in FSA

ANALYZE REQUIREMENTS FROM SOURCES OTHER THAN THE CAPABILITIES REVIEW AND RISK ASSESSMENT (CRRA) (INCLUDE LOG EXPERTISE ON TEAM)

Changes to National Military Strategy, Defense Planning Guidance, etc


Updated National Military Strategy, Defense Planning Guidance, etc (Top Down directed Capability Requirements)

Functional Capability Boards, Combatant Commands, AF/A5, MAJCOM Requirements Organizations

Initial Capabilities Document (ICD)



DEFINE SUPPORTABILITY OBJECTIVES Initial Capabilities Document (ICD) Development


Potential materiel solutions





INCLUDE SUPPORTABILITY OBJECTIVES IN INITIAL CAPABILITIES DOCUMENT (ICD)

Initial Capabilities Document (ICD) Development







INCLUDE PRODUCT SUPPORT CAPABILITIES IN ALTERNATIVE OF ACTION (AOA) PLAN Decision to proceed to Concept Decision point or Appropriate Milestone

DoDI 5000.2 (Requirements for Alternative of Action (AOA) for ACAT I programs)

Supportability Objectives that need to be addressed in Alternative of Action (AOA)

OUSD(AT&L), DPA&E, AF/A5, MAJCOM Requirements Organizations, any Acquisition Leads identified, Office of Aerospace Studies

Alternative of Action (AOA) Study Plan

Functional Subject Matter Experts (SME)s Participation in Alternative of Action (AOA) Planning

ACQUIRE CONCEPT DECISION FROM MILESTONE DECISION AUTHORITY (MDA)

Concept Decision Point Review by Milestone Decision Authority (MDA)

Documentation Required by DoDI 5000.2

Milestone Decision Authority (MDA), Whatever Acquisition Leads identified, AF/A5, MAJCOM Requirements Organizations

Approval to Proceed Into Concept Refinement Phase

Milestone Decision Authority (MDA) Led Meeting

Functional Subject Matter Experts (SME)s Participation in Documentation Developed to Support CD Review

EVALUATE PRODUCT SUPPORT CAPABILITY IN ALTERNATIVE OF ACTION (AOA) FOR THE BEST MATERIAL APPROACHES

Alternative of Action (AOA) Study Begun


Initial Capabilities Document (ICD) FSA Analysis and Alternative of Action (AOA) Study Plan

OUSD AT&L, DPA&E, AF/A5, MAJCOM Requirements Organizations, any Acquisition Leads identified, Office of Aerospace Studies

Alternative of Action (AOA) Results

MAJCOM Led Alternative of Action (AOA) Process

Functional Subject Matter Experts (SME)s Participation in Alternative of Action (AOA) Studies

PARTICIPATE IN AND DOCUMENT THE INITIAL TECHNOLOGY REVIEW

Alternative of Action (AOA) Study Begun


Initial Capabilities Document (ICD) FSA Analysis and Alternative of Action (AOA) Study Plan


Understanding of Technology issues, maturity for each potential Alternative of Action (AOA) solution.



INCLUDE PRODUCT SUPPORT CONCEPTS IN PREFERRED SYSTEM CONCEPT Alternative of Action (AOA) Study Draft Results


Identification of Preferred Concept


Initial information related to PS Concept for Alternative of Action (AOA) preferred system concept



PARTICIPATE IN DEFINING, ANALYZING & SELECTING COURSE OF ACTION (INCREMENTS & PROGRAM STRATEGIES) (PER AFI 63-101)

Reduction inTotal Ownership Cost (RTOC)

Preferred System Concept Identified

Information concerning Preferred System Concept from Alternative of Action (AOA) Study

Acquisition Lead, MAJCOM Requirements Org

MAJCOM Agreed Course of Action (COA) for delivering capability. (Evolutionary Strategy or Single Step to Completion)

Functional Subject Matter Experts (SME)s Participation in Development of Course of Action (COA)s


AFI 63-101, DoDI 5000.2


Acquisition Lead, MAJCOM Requirements Org, Test Community

Initial Test Strategy for Program at MS A

Test Community Participation in Development of Initial Test Strategy

PARTICIPATE IN SYSTEM ENGINEERING PLAN (SEP) DEVELOPMENT


AFI 63-101, DoDI 5000.2


Acquisition Lead, any Engineering Support ( eg. Center EN Staff)

Initial Systems Engineering Plan (Systems Engineering Plan (SEP)) for MS A

Engineers Participation in Development of Initial Systems Engineering Plan

DEVELOP TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY (INCLUDING PRODUCT SUPPORT)Preferred System Concept Identified

AFI 63-101, DoDI 5000.2

Information concerning Preferred System Concept from Alternative of Action (AOA) Study, Approved Course of Action (COA) approach

Functional Subject Matter Experts (SME) participation in development of TDS

DEVELOP INITIAL PRODUCT SUPPORT STRATEGY IN LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT PLAN (LCMP) (PERFORMANCE-BASED LOGISTICS , PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS (PPP), LOGISTICS ELEMENTS, ETC)Logistics Planning and Requirements System (LOGPARS) Army System


AFI 63-101, DoDI 5000.2, Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) Guide, AF Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)S


Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) or Acq Plan depending on ACAT level

Functional Subject Matter Experts (SME) participation in development of Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP)/Acq Plan

REVIEW REQUIREMENTS DOCUMENTS/ INITIAL CAPABILITY OBJECTIVE (ICD)





REVIEW STRATEGIES FOR SIMILAR PRODUCTS/ STRATEGIES





DEVELOP ALTERNATIVES FOR PRODUCT SUPPORT STRATEGY













EDIT AND COORDINATE WRITING OF LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT PLAN (LCMP)





REVIEW ENTIRE LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT PLAN (LCMP) FOR DISCONNECTS





APPROVE PRODUCT SUPPORT STRATEGY(S) (ACQUISITION STRATEGY PANEL (ASP))





FINALIZE LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT PLAN (LCMP) BASED ON ACQUISITION STRATEGY PANEL (ASP) RECOMMENDATIONS





ENSURE SUPPORTABILITY INCLUDED IN EXPECTATION MANAGEMENT AGREEMENTS (EMAs)Preferred System Concept Identified


Acquisition Lead, Lead MAJCOM Requirements Org

Expectation Management Agreement (although since you don't have a Capability Development Document (CDD) yet an Expectation Management Agreement is really premature at this point.)

Functional Subject Matter Experts (SME) participation in development of Expectation Management Agreement

INCLUDE SUPPORTABILITY IN THE SOURCE SELECTION PLAN (SSP) Preferred System Concept Identified

Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) / AF Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)s


Acquisition Lead, Center Contracting Org

Source Selection Plan (if required at this point)

Functional Subject Matter Experts (SME) participation in development of Source Selection Plan (SSP)


AFI 63-101, DoDI 5000.2, Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) Guide, AFFARS


Acquisition Lead. OSD IPTs, Defense Acquisition Executive (DAE)

ASR (Only ACAT ID and IAM programs)

Acquisition Led Process and IPT process

Functional Subject Matter Experts (SME) participation in development of Acq Strategy

ENSURE ACQUISITION STRATEGY PLAN SUPPORTABILITY TEMPLATE COMPLETED


AFI 63-101, DoDI 5000.2, Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) Guide, AFFARS


Acquisition Strategy Panel (ASP) Charts (if Acquisition Strategy Panel (ASP) req'd at this point)

Acquisition Strategy Panel (ASP) Process

Functional Subject Matter Experts (SME) participation in development of Acq Strategy

mailto:[email protected]?subject=A&S%20Tool%20Kit

E2

Current IT systems that either aid in accomplishing or provide input to a task. IT systems verified monthly thru the Enterprise Information Technology Data Repository (EITDR)

K2

Business rules that govern performance of an activity

L2

Information or resource consumed in the activity to create the output

M2

Those ultimately responsible for the process being accomplished

N2

Information produced by an activity

O2

Resource that performs or supports an activity, but not consumed by the activity

P2

Duration of the process step

2 OF 159

TASK DESCRIPTION

IT S

ys

tem

s

TR

IGG

ER

CO

NT

RO

LS

INP

UT

OU

TP

UT

ME

CH

AN

ISM

S

CY

CL

E T

IME

SD

D (

INT

EG

RA

TIO

N)

PL

AN

SU

PP

OR

T

DE

SIG

N S

UP

PO

RT

FIE

LD

SU

PP

OR

T

MA

INT

AIN

PR

OD

UC

TS

IMP

RO

VE

PR

OD

UC

TS

RE

TIR

E P

RO

DU

CT

S

OR

G/P

LA

YE

RS

SA

F,

HQ

, L

OG

RE

SO

UR

CE

S

CO

NS

UM

ED

IMP

RO

VE

ME

NT

O

PP

OR

TU

NIT

IES

CO

NC

EP

T

RE

FIN

EM

EN

T

TE

CH

NO

LO

GY

D

EV

EL

OP

ME

NT

SD

D

(D

EM

ON

ST

RA

TIO

N)

PR

OD

UC

TIO

N &

D

EP

LO

YM

EN

T

OP

ER

AT

ION

S &

S

UP

PO

RT

DE

TE

RM

INE

S

UP

PO

RT

R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

TS

DE

VE

LO

P &

AC

QU

IRE

S

UP

PO

RT

MA

NA

GE

C

AP

AB

ILIT

IES

Acquisition Led Process

X X

Acquisition Led Process

X X

Contractual actions Acquisition Led Process

X X

PARTICIPATE IN RISK MANAGEMENT N/A AFI 63-101, DoD 5000 Acquisition Led Process

X X


X X

PARTICIPATE IN SOURCE SELECTION (LOGISTICIAN) Acquisition Led Process

X X

Program Documentation Acquisition Led Process

X X

N/A

X X

MILESTONE A DECISIONN/A Milestone A decision Paper/MS Office 60 days HQ AFMC, AF, SAF

X X

Milestone A decision Prod/Log Centers 6 months Prod/Log Centers

X X

Milestone A decision

X X

ASSIGN TECHNICAL ORDER MANAGERN/A Milestone A decision HQ process Prod/Log centers, HQ AFMC

X X

N/A Milestone A decision HQ process Prod/Log centers, HQ AFMC

X X

N/A Milestone A decision 30 days

X X

X XAWARD THE TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT Milestone A decision, $$ Program Office Cadre Contract 150 days total

X X

Contractual Actions Policy

X X

N/A 60 days

X X

N/A Template <30 days Prod/Log Center, MAJCOM This is an improvement

X X

N/A $$$ 30 + days

X X

REMIS, CAMS

X X

N/A

X X

N/A Contract award MS Word 30 - 60 days

X X

N/A 45 days

X X

PARTICIPATE IN RISK MANAGEMENT N/A Continuous

X X

PARTICIPATE IN CONTRACT OVERSIGHT AND REVIEW N/A Contract award Contract MS Office tools

X X

Technical data, $$ Study reports On-going Master data base to share info

X X

EVALUATE TECHNOLOGY DEMO FOR SUPPORTABILITY N/A $$, AF procedures Report Various

X X

INCLUDE SUPPORTABILITY REQUIREMENTS IN REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP)Pre Award Information Exchange System (PIXS) ConWrite FEDBIZOPS


Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)/AF Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)s



Request for Proposal (RFP)

Functional Subject Matter Experts (SME) participation in development of Request for Proposal (RFP)

INCLUDE DATA RIGHTS IN THE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP)

Unique Identification (UID) Registry


Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)/AF Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)s, Public Law




Functional Subject Matter Experts (SME) participation in development of Request for Proposal (RFP)

REVIEW BERRY AMENDMENT FOR APPLICATION TO YOUR PROGRAM AND ENSURE COMPLIANCE IN ALL CONTRACTING ACTIONS

Public Law 10 USC 2533

Contractor and Organic design data

Acquisition lead, Contractor, Legal

Contractual language, Compliance data

Compliance with law, support National Security Strategies

INCLUDE OPTIONS FOR RADIO-FREQUENCY IDENTIFICATION (RFID) IN THE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP)

INCLUDE OPTIONS FOR UNIQUE IDENTIFICATION (UID) IN THE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP)



Acquisition Lead, Appropriate Logistics Rep

Program Planning, Including Risk Management

Functional Subject Matter Experts (SME) participation in Risk Management Planning

INCLUDE LOGISTICS ACTIVITIES IN THE INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT PLAN / INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE (IMP/IMS)Preferred System Concept Identified

Integrated Master Plan / Integrated Master Schedule (IMP/IMS) Guide



Integrated Master Plan / Integrated Master Schedule (IMP/IMS)

Functional Subject Matter Experts (SME) participation in development of Integrated Master Plan / Integrated Master Schedule (IMP/IMS)

EZ Source, Contractor Performance Assessment Report System (CPARS) Navy System



Source Selection Plan (if required at this point) Information concerning Preferred System Concept from Alternative of Action (AOA) Study, Approved Course of Action (COA) approach


Source Selection Decision

Functional Subject Matter Experts (SME) participation in Source Selection

ENSURE COST ESTIMATE INCLUDES LIFE CYCLE SUPPORT COSTSLogistics Composite Model (LCOM)


AFI 63-101, DoDI 5000.2



Functional Subject Matter Experts (SME) participation in Program Cost Estimating

PREPARE DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED FOR MILESTONE A Preferred System Concept Identified

AFI 63-101, DoDI 5000.2


Acquisition Lead, Appropriate Logistics Rep, MAJCOM Requirements Org, AF/A5, Test Community, Cost Community

Program Documentation Required at MILESTONE A

Various Functional Lead processes depending on Document

Functional Subject Matter Experts (SME) participation in Developing Program Documentation

VERIFY THE MISSION ASSIGNMENT DECISION FOR ACQUISITION & SUSTAINMENT MANAGEMENT

AF process on mission assignment (old XOX?)

ASR, Acquisition Strategy Panel (ASP), Alternative of Action (AOA), any program direction documents

was AF/XO, will now include AFMC/A8

Mission Assignment direction

Making the decision this early IS THE improvement

ENSURE ADEQUATE LOGISTICS RESOURCES ARE ASSIGNED FOR PROGRAM

Sustainment / Acquisition Composite Model (SACOM), CMS

Command mil/civ/ktr manning and control process (entitlements from AFPC), Contract Estimating & Pricing (CEP), $$

Milestone Decision, Mission Assignment, New Work package

New Work Package/Program Objective Memorandum (POM) input

Command and center processes

Opportunity to centralize this work in a new work Group/ACE/XR

ESTABLISH A TECHNICAL ORDER ACQUISITION PROGRAM TO 00-5-3, Technical Manual Contract Requirements (TMCR) Document TM-86-01

Initial Capabilities Document (ICD), Draft Capability Development Document (CDD), Maintenance Strategy, Product Support Strategy

Program Office, MAJCOM, Technical Order Manager, Prime Contractor, TO Integrated Program Team

Technical Manual Contract Requirements (TMCR) Document TM-86-0, Updated Initial Capabilities Document (ICD), Draft Capability Development Document (CDD), Maintenance Strategy, Product Support Strategy

TO Planning & Requirements Conference

Program Office, MAJCOM, Technical Order Manager, Prime Contractor, TO Integrated Program Team

INITIATE DEPOT SOURCE OF REPAIR (DSOR) PROCESS AND THE DEPOT MAINTENANCE INTERSERVICING (DMI) Mission assignment, technical data

Prod/Log Centers, HQ AFMC/A4

Source of Repair Assignment Process (SORAP)/Depot Maintenance Interservicing (DMI) started

Source of Repair Assignment Process (SORAP) process

Doing it this early is an improvement

DETERMINE CORE & ASSIGN CANDIDATE DEPOT (REF NEW SOURCE of REPAIR ASSIGNMENT PROCESS (SORAP))

Mission assignment, technical data





ESTABLISH DEPOT MAINTENANCE ACTIVATION WORKING GROUP (DMAWG) TEAM HQ process for Source of Repair Assignment Process (SORAP) and Cost Oriented Resource Estimating (CORE)

Source of Repair Assignment Process (SORAP), Cost Oriented Resource Estimating (CORE), Program Data

Prod/Log Centers, Contractor

Depot Maintenance Activation Working Group (DMAWG) team officially names and responsible

MS Office, face to face meetings

Prod/Log Centers, contractor Establishing this early AND having them meet

ESTABLISH PERIODIC LOGISTICS PLANNING MEETINGS Navy Air Force

Interface (NAFI)Contracting process, Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)

Technical information, studies, $$, lab input

AMOS, Pre Award Information Exchange System (PIXS)

Program Office Cadre MAJCOMs

Standing Basic Ordering Agreement (BOA) for multiple efforts

ENSURE WEAPON SYSTEM PROGRAM COMPLIES WITH AIR FORCE POLICY FOR NO NEW MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT WITHOUT AF/CIO APPROVAL. THIS EXCLUDES MISSION CRITICAL COMPUTER RESOURCES (MCCR) AND NATIONAL SECURITY SYSTEMS

Enterprise Information Technology Data Repository (EITDR)

Requirements, Acquisition Strategy, Contractor Data

Acquisition and Sustainment Organizations, Base IT Organization

Contractual direction, Technical requirements, Approved new IT System

IT System approval process, Acquisition Strategy approval process

Prod/Log Centers, contractor Reduce proliferation of IT systems

ENSURE SUPPORTABILITY INCLUDED IN EXPECTATION MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT (EMA)s

Expectation Management Agreement (EMA) required or update

Expectation Management Agreement (EMA) process

Technical information, studies, $$, lab input, Source of Repair Assignment Process (SORAP) mission assignment, Required Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) if available

Prod/Log Centers, MAJCOM's

Expectation Management Agreement (EMA)s

Expectation Management Agreement (EMA) process and templates

Prod/Log Centers, MAJCOMs

Work Expectation Management Agreement (EMA)s a single process initiative where feasible to have umbrella Expectation Management Agreement (EMA)s

INITIATE SUPPORTABILITY REPORTING TEMPLATE FOR ALL PROGRAM EXECUTIVE OFFICER (PEO) REVIEWS

Program Executive Officer (PEO) review or any review requirements

Sustainment Template, controlled by HQ AFMC/A4

Technical data, Prod/Log center assessment, FM status, issues, risk assessment


Sustainment template chart with backup

PARTICIPATE IN OPERATIONAL SITE REVIEWS Site Activation Task Force (SATAF) planning, MAJCOM planning

Data from site visits, MAJCOM/log center info, Technical data, $$

Prod/Log Center, MAJCOM's

Site plans, input for facilities budgets/Program Objective Memorandum (POM)

TDY's, meetings, reports, MS Office products

Prod/Log Centers, MAJCOMs

Need a better sharing mechanism for site data (politics of Base Realignment and Closure Comittee (BRACC) an issue)

DETERMINE MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL REQUIREMENTS Preferred System Concept Identified

AFI 10-601, AFI 10-602, 10 USC 2434, DoD 5000.2, AFI 38-201, AFI 38-202, Defense Acquisition Guide Book

System Requirements, ICD, CDD, CPD, SEP, LCMP, Functional Baseline, , TAD, CARD

Logisticians, Acquisition Lead, Systems Engineering, Sustainment Engineering, Training Personnel, Manpower personnel

Inputs to SEP, LCMP, TEMP, ICD, CDD, CPD, MER, LCCE, Training Plans

IPT Meeting with Government and contractor on supportability, manpower, and personnel

Pre source selection through end of program

Minimize life cycle cost while maximizing system readiness and personnel and system effectiveness

DEFINE AND IMPLEMENT MILITARY CONSTRUCTION (MILCON) REQUIREMENTS Facility requirement Identified

AFH 32-1084, AFI 32-1021,

ICD, CDD, Site Survey, SATAF, Facilities Requirements Plan from Contractor

MAJCOM, Product / Logistics Center, Base Civil Engineering, Contractor

Site plans, input for facilities budgets / MILCON, Programmatic Environment Safety and Health Evaluation (PESHE)

TDY, Meetings, International Building Code, Environmental Compliance,

MAJCOM, Product / Logistics Center, Base Civil Engineering, Contractor

Start planning as early as possible due to MILCON lead time

INCLUDE SUPPORTABILITY REQUIREMENTS IN DEFENSE CONTRACTS MANAGEMENT AGENCY (DCMA) MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT (MOA)

Defense Contracts Management Agency (DCMA) mission cope

Previous Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) & Memorandum of Agreement (MOA)s in force at that plant location

Defense Contracts Management Agency (DCMA), Program Office, ALC, Prime Contractor, MAJCOMs

Defense Contracts Management Agency (DCMA) Memorandum of Agreement (MOA)

PM team, Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO), ALC, Defense Contracts Management Agency (DCMA)

Apply single process initiative philosophy

REVIEW LOGISTICS ACTIVITIES IN THE INTEGRATED MASTER PLAN / INTEGRATED MASTER SCHEDULE (IMP/IMS)

Requirement for Integrated Master Plan / Integrated Master Schedule (IMP/IMS) identified

Integrated Master Plan / Integrated Master Schedule (IMP/IMS) Data Item Description (DID)

Identification of required logistics activities and associated timelines

ALC and Product Center logisticians, Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO)

Completed Integrated Master Plan / Integrated Master Schedule (IMP/IMS)

Integrated Master Plan / Integrated Master Schedule (IMP/IMS) Data Item Description (DID)/Template

ALC and PC logisticians, Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO)

Continuous Risk Mitigation Activities

Risk Management Guidelines

Identified Supportability Risks and Current Assessment

Contractor, ALC and PC logisticians, Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO), Engineers

Updated Risk Status/Mitigation Plans

Meetings with contractor and Govt IPTs

Govt and Contractor Logisticians, Engineers, PM, Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO)

Details of contract, Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) clauses, AFI's, Contractor, security reqts

Program Office, Contractor

Accepted contract deliverables, briefing charts, studies, reports, System Metric & Reporting Tool (SMART), Management Asset Review (MAR), Defense Acquisition Executive (DAE), Program Executive Officer (PEO) review

On going life of contract +

Program Office/ALC/Contractor, MAJCOMs

Increased risk less oversight/ Navy model

ADVOCATE PROPOSED LOGISTICS ENGINEERING DESIGN CHANGES & TRADE STUDIES (NON-DESTRUCTIVE INSPECTION (NDI), CORROSION, HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, PRECIOUS METALS)

Environmental Safety and Occupational Health (ESOH)

Engineering review identifying areas for trade studies, any design reviews

$$, AFI's on system engineering, Mil Std, CDRL

Contractor, ALC and PC logisticians, , Engineers, lab personnel,

Disciplined scientific approach, contract vehicles

Prod/log center, Lab, contractors

CONSIDER THE LIFE CYCLE IMPLICATIONS OF TECHNICAL ORDERS

Contract, milestone direction, Key Performance Parameters (KPP)s Acquisition Program Baseline (APB)

Technical data, demo plan

Prod/Log Center, MAJCOMs, test centers, contractors

Average less than 120 days

Prod/Log Center, MAJCOMs, test centers, contractors

E2


K2


L2


M2


N2


O2


P2


3 OF 159

TASK DESCRIPTION

IT S

ys

tem

s

TR

IGG

ER

CO

NT

RO

LS

INP

UT

OU

TP

UT

ME

CH

AN

ISM

S

CY

CL

E T

IME

SD

D (

INT

EG

RA

TIO

N)

PL

AN

SU

PP

OR

T

DE

SIG

N S

UP

PO

RT

FIE

LD

SU

PP

OR

T

MA

INT

AIN

PR

OD

UC

TS

IMP

RO

VE

PR

OD

UC

TS

RE

TIR

E P

RO

DU

CT

S

OR

G/P

LA

YE

RS

SA

F,

HQ

, L

OG

RE

SO

UR

CE

S

CO

NS

UM

ED

IMP

RO

VE

ME

NT

O

PP

OR

TU

NIT

IES

CO

NC

EP

T

RE

FIN

EM

EN

T

TE

CH

NO

LO

GY

D

EV

EL

OP

ME

NT

SD

D

(D

EM

ON

ST

RA

TIO

N)

PR

OD

UC

TIO

N &

D

EP

LO

YM

EN

T

OP

ER

AT

ION

S &

S

UP

PO

RT

DE

TE

RM

INE

S

UP

PO

RT

R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

TS

DE

VE

LO

P &

AC

QU

IRE

S

UP

PO

RT

MA

NA

GE

C

AP

AB

ILIT

IES

N/A DoD 4140.7 target 6 months

X X

REMIS, CAMS

X X

N/A

X X

N/A Analysis results Better decision making

X X

N/A Acquisition Led Process 30 days

X X

N/A Acquisition Led Process 30 days

X X

N/A

X X

N/A AFIs, DoDIs Prod/Log Centers 60 days

X X


X X

N/A SYS Performance Spec AFIs, DoDIs Prod/Log Centers SYS Performance Spec 60 days

X X


X X


X X

N/A 30 work days

X X

N/A Prod/Log Centers 60 days

X X

CMS FM regulations Prod/Log Centers 60 days

X X

120 days

X X

120 days

120 days

120 days

UPDATE RISK ASSESSMENT FOR ALTERNATIVE (S) 120 days

UPDATE COST ESTIMATE FOR ALTERNATIVE (S) 120 days

120 days

120 days

CONTACT AIR TRANSPORTABILITY TEST LOAD AGENCY (ATTLA) FOR AIR TRANSPORTABILITY REQUIREMENTS / ISSUES (AIR DROP AND TEST LOADING I.E. G-FORCE)

Air drop requirement, Key Performance Parameters (KPP)s, Operational Requirements Document (ORD), contract, program schedule

Performance spec, technical data, funding, tech orders

ASC/EN, Contractor, Program Office personnel

signed Air Worthiness certification

manpower and dollars, ATTLA equipment, weapon system platform,

ASC/EN, Contractor, Program Office personnel

ADDRESS HUMAN SYSTEMS INTEGRATION (HSI) FACTORS Preferred System Concept Identified

AFI 10-601, AFI 10-602, DoD 5000.2, AFI 63-107, AFI 63-111, Defense Acquisition Guide Book, MIL-HDBK-502

System Requirements, ICD, CDD, CPD, SEP, LCMP, Functional Baseline, TAD, CARD

Logisticians, Acquisition Lead, Systems Engineering, Sustainment Engineering, Training, Personnel

Inputs to SEP, LCMP, TEMP, ICD, CDD, CPD, MER, LCCE, Training Plans

IPT Meeting with Government and contractor on supportability/training/systems engineering, manpower and personnel


Minimize life cycle cost while maximizing system readiness and personnel and system effectiveness

REFINE SUPPORTABILITY OBJECTIVES Initial Capabilities Document (ICD) Development






Prod/Log Center, MAJCOM, contractor, HQ AFMC

CONSIDER APPLICATION OF MODELING AND SIMULATION TOOLS Requirements for analysis in preparation for decision making

Individual model, Instructions and Operations, DoD 5000.2 E5.1.1.10

Government and Contractor Data

Government, Contractor and MAJCOM personnel

Applicable models to be used (see checklist)

Prod/Log Center, MAJCOM, contractor, HQ AFMC

REVIEW TEST & EVALUATION STRATEGY FOR SUPPORTABILITY CONSIDERATIONS


AFI 63-101, DoDI 5000.2


Acquisition Lead, MAJCOM Requirements Org, Test Community

Initial Test Strategy for Program at MS A

Prod/Log Center, MAJCOM, Test Centers, Contractor

PARTICIPATE IN SYSTEMS ENGINEERING PLAN (SEP) DEVELOPMENT


AFI 63-101, DoDI 5000.2


Acquisition Lead, any Engineering Support ( eg. Center EN Staff)

Initial Systems Engineering Plan (SEP) for MS A

Prod/Log Center, MAJCOM, Test Centers, Contractor

PARTICIPATE IN THE COMPUTER RESOURCES WORKING GROUP (CRWG) OR THE COMPUTER RESOURCES INTEGRATED PRODUCT TEAM (CR-IPT)Acquisition or modification that involves software and computer systems

Best Practice (rescinded AFI 800-14 & AFMCI 800-21)

Acquisition or modification that involves software and computer systems

Prod/Log Centers, MAJCOM's, Contractors

Computer Resources Lifecycle Management Plan (CRLCMP)

Systems Engineering Plan (SEP)


Life Cycle Support for computer resources

INCORPORATE SUPPORTABILITY REQUIREMENTS IN DRAFT CAPABILITY DEVELOPMENT DOCUMENT (CDD)

Capability Development Document (CDD) development

Supportability Concept, Plan, Cost Oriented Resource Estimating (CORE), technical data

Capability Development Document (CDD)

The document, meeting, emails

Prod/Log Centers, contractor Guides and AFI should require logistics participation for Capability Development Document (CDD)s

DEVELOP SUPPORTABILITY KEY PERFORMANCE PARAMETERS (KPPs) Key Performance Parameters (KPP)s development


Key Performance Parameters (KPP)s


Prod/Log Centers, contractor

INCLUDE SUPPORTABILITY REQUIREMENTS IN THE SYSTEM PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION




ENSURE CONSIDERATION OF DESIGN INTERFACE FOR LIFE CYCLE LOGISTICS CHECKLIST

INCLUDE SUPPORTABILITY REQUIREMENTS IN THE COST ANALYSIS REQUIREMENT DESCRIPTION (CARD), PROGRAM OFFICE ESTIMATE (POE), COMPONENT COST ANALYSIS (CCA), INDEPENDENT COST ESTIMATE (ICE), AFFORDABILITY ASSESSMENTCost Analysis Requirement Description (CARD), Program Office Estimate (POE), Component Cost Analysis (CCA), ICE, Affordability Assessment


Cost Analysis Requirement Description (CARD), Program Office Estimate (POE), Component Cost Analysis (CCA), ICE, Affordability Assessment



INCLUDE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (SE) IN LIFE CYCLE COST DOCUMENTS INCLUDING REPLACEMENT COSTS


Supportability Concept, Plan, Cost Oriented Resource Estimating (CORE), technical data, any support equipment available, cost data

Cost Analysis Requirement Description (CARD), Program Office Estimate (POE), Component Cost Analysis (CCA), ICE, Affordability Assessment, ensure that support equipment replacement costs are included



INITIATE THE STRATEGIC SOURCE of REPAIR (SSOR) PROCESS Source of Repair Assignment Process (SORAP) process

SECA Policy Memo (pending - currently at HQ AFMC/A4 for coord); AFI 63-107; Source of Repair Assignment Process (SORAP) Implementation Guide

Program data to fill in Template A, Phase 1 data elements

System Program Manager (SPM)s, PGMs

Request for candidate depot/core analyses; Template A, Phase 1 data

Automated Source of Repair Assignment Process (SORAP) Electronic Manager (in work); Emails


INCLUDE SUPPORTABILITY IN THE ACQUISITION PROGRAM BASELINE (APB) Acquisition Program Baseline (APB)

Acquisition Program Baseline (APB) Guidelines


Acquisition Program Baseline (APB)

The document, reports, meetings, presentations


INCLUDE SUPPORTABILITY REQUIREMENTS IN PROGRAM OBJECTIVE MEMORANDUM (POM) SUBMISSIONProgram Objective Memorandum (POM) Data Call


Program Objective Memorandum (POM)

Future budget, reports, meetings, presentations


REFINE PRODUCT SUPPORT STRATEGY IN LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT PLAN (LCMP) (INCREMENTS, PERFORMANCE-BASED LOGISTICS , PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS (PPP), LOG ELEMENTS, ETC)Logistics Planning and Requirements System (LOGPARS) Army System

Program cycle/major changes dictates need for update

Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) Guide, AFI63-107

Updated acquisition and product support strategy; cost schedule, performance, supportability data; updated Expectation Management Agreement (EMA)s

PM Team including logisticians, Program Executive Officer (PEO), ALC/CC, Test org; SAF/AQ, Acquisition Strategy Panel (ASP)/Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) approval authorities participants

Approved updated Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP)

Established guidance, regulations; Protocol Process


REVIEW REQUIREMENT DOCUMENT/ CAPABILITY OBJECTIVE (CDD)










Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) Guide, AFI 63-107






REFINE ALTERNATIVE (S) FOR PRODUCT SUPPORT STRATEGY






















UPDATE WRITING OF LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT PLAN (LCMP)
















E2


K2


L2


M2


N2


O2


P2


4 OF 159

TASK DESCRIPTION

IT S

ys

tem

s

TR

IGG

ER

CO

NT

RO

LS

INP

UT

OU

TP

UT

ME

CH

AN

ISM

S

CY

CL

E T

IME

SD

D (

INT

EG

RA

TIO

N)

PL

AN

SU

PP

OR

T

DE

SIG

N S

UP

PO

RT

FIE

LD

SU

PP

OR

T

MA

INT

AIN

PR

OD

UC

TS

IMP

RO

VE

PR

OD

UC

TS

RE

TIR

E P

RO

DU

CT

S

OR

G/P

LA

YE

RS

SA

F,

HQ

, L

OG

RE

SO

UR

CE

S

CO

NS

UM

ED

IMP

RO

VE

ME

NT

O

PP

OR

TU

NIT

IES

CO

NC

EP

T

RE

FIN

EM

EN

T

TE

CH

NO

LO

GY

D

EV

EL

OP

ME

NT

SD

D

(D

EM

ON

ST

RA

TIO

N)

PR

OD

UC

TIO

N &

D

EP

LO

YM

EN

T

OP

ER

AT

ION

S &

S

UP

PO

RT

DE

TE

RM

INE

S

UP

PO

RT

R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

TS

DE

VE

LO

P &

AC

QU

IRE

S

UP

PO

RT

MA

NA

GE

C

AP

AB

ILIT

IES

120 days

120 days

N/A

X X


X X

N/A ALC and PC logisticians 180 days

X X


X X

PARTICIPATE IN ALTERNATIVE OF ACTION (AOA) UPDATE N/AX X

N/AX X


X X

ALC and PC logisticians 120 days

X X

X X


X X

N/A Approved Form 9

X X

System Spec MIL PRF 49506 CDD, EMA.APB, 1 year

X X X

X X

DoD 4140.1-R Clean Data

X X

X X

120 days

X X

UID Registry Logisticians 30 days

X X

N/A 80 work days

X X

N/A 45 days

X X

APPROVE PRODUCT SUPPORT STRATEGY (ACQUISITION STRATEGY PANEL (ASP))








FINALIZE LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT PLAN (LCMP) BASED ON SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS REVIEW (SRR) AND ACQUISITION STRATEGY PANEL (ASP) RECOMMENDATIONS









Receipt of Customer Requirement; annual update in conjunction with Program Management Directive (PMD) update

Expectation Management Agreement (EMA) Guide; System Metric & Reporting Tool (SMART) Guidelines

Customer Requirements; discussions/agreements with customer; contract terms and conditions; Expectation Management Agreement (EMA) Guidelines

Customer (Operator, Maintainer and designated SES/GO); System Program Manager (SPM) / Depot Supportability Manager (DSM) / System Supportability Manager (SSM); Program Executive Officer (PEO), ALC Commander

Signed Expectation Management Agreement (EMA)

Meetings; System Metric & Reporting Tool (SMART) System, Guide

minimum once per year. Initial Expectation Management Agreement (EMA): 6 months, 160 man-hours; follow-on Expectation Management Agreement (EMA)s 2 months; 60 man-hours

PM Team, Customer, PEG, CAG, Program Executive Officer (PEO), ALC Commander, Customer Staff

ENSURE SUPPORTABILITY REQUIREMENTS ARE INCLUDED IN THE CAPABILITY DEVELOPMENT DOCUMENT (CDD) (REFINE KEY PERFORMANCE PARAMETERS (KPP)s

Key Performance Parameters (KPP)s development


Key Performance Parameters (KPP)s



INCLUDE SUPPORTABILITY IN THE SOURCE SELECTION PLAN (SSP)

Determination of competitive acquisition

Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 15, SS Guides and Template

Risk Assessment Results, Key Supportability Requirements

Approved Source Selection Plan (SSP)

Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), Guides, Templates

PM, Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO), ALC and PC logisticians, Source Selection Plan (SSP) approval chain of command, warfighter

ENSURE ACQUISITION STRATEGY PANEL (ASP) SUPPORTABILITY TEMPLATE COMPLETED

Notification of Acquisition Strategy Panel (ASP)

Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) part 7, Acquisition Strategy Panel (ASP) Guides and Templates, local Acquisition Strategy Panel (ASP) procedures

Risk Assessment Results, Key Supportability Requirements and Strategy

Completed Acquisition Strategy Panel (ASP) Briefing; Action Items Completed

Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), Guides, Templates, Protocol

PM, Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO), ALC and PC logisticians, Acquisition Strategy Panel (ASP) Secretariat and Panel, warfighter

Notification that update is required

Alternative of Action (AOA) Regulations/Guidelines

DT&E/OA assessment, LMI Data

Program Team including Logisticians, warfighter

Completed Alternative of Action (AOA) Update



PARTICIPATE IN SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS REVIEW (SRR) (DEMO CONCEPTS)

REFINE SUPPORTABILITY REQUIREMENTS IN THE SYSTEM PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION




INCLUDE SUPPORTABILITY REQUIREMENTS IN REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP)

Pre Award Information Exchange System (PIXS) ConWrite FEDBIZOPS

Notification to develop Request for Proposal (RFP)

Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)

Draft Capability Production Document (CPD); Supportability Data from DT&E; Acquisition Strategy

Defined/Approved Request for Proposal (RFP) Supportability Requirements

Request for Proposal (RFP) Template, Clauses

ALC and PC logisticians; Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO)

DEVELOP AND ACQUIRE SUPPORTABILITY DATAADDRESS AUTOMATED TEST SYSTEMS (ATS) ACQUISITION

ADDRESS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT MANAGEMENT

ADDRESS CALIBRATION SUPPORT FOR NEW ACQUISITIONS

PROVIDE RECOMMENDED SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (SE) CONTRACT DATA REQUIREMENTS LIST (CDRL)s





Support equipment Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s



REVIEW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT RECOMMENDATION DATA (SERD) CHECKLISTContractor Support Equipment Requirements Document (SERD) list

MIL STD 300, selection priority, Support Equipment Requirements Document (SERD) tracking system

Contractor Support Equipment Requirements Document (SERD) list, program data

Program Office, ALCs, users, contractor

Support Equipment Requirements Document (SERD) checklist, allowance source code

DEVELOP A TECHNICAL ORDER DATA REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) INCLUDING THE TECHNICAL MANUAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS (TMCR) DOCUMENT TM-86-01

DEVELOP TECHNICAL ORDER MANAGEMENT PLAN (TOMP)

INVOLVE GAINING ALC, USING COMMAND AND SAFETY

PERFORM SUPPORTABILITY ANALYSES TO ACHIEVE PERFORMANCE BASED LOGISTICS (DoDD 5000.1 E1.17) -- SYSTEM ENGINEERING ANALYSES WHICH WILL MINIMIZE TOTAL OWNERSHIP COSTS WHILE DELIVERING REQUIRED MISSION CAPABILITY

Product Life Cycle Management data systems


Supportability Analysis data, Source data for maintenance plans etc

System Engineering Analyses, FMECA, RCM, RLA, maintenance task analysis, etc.

SPO, Contractor, User, ALC, Stakeholders

PERFORMANCE BASED LOGISTICS STRATEGY. THE PM SHALL IDENTIFY OPERATIONAL CAPABILITY ORIENTED MEASURABLE SUSTAINMENT REQUIREMENTS TO BE TRACKED DURING OPERATIONS THESE SHALL BE THE BASIS OF MEASURES OF SUCCESS FOR THE PRODUCT SUPPORT INTEGRATOR WHO SHALL BE IDENTIFIED BY ORGANIZATION AT MILESTONE B. THESE SHALL BE DEVELOPED IN A DRAFT PRODUCT SUPPORT AGREEMENT WHICH WILL BE NEGOTIATED WITH THE O&S EXPECTATION MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT. THE PRODUCT SUPPORT AGREEMENT SHALL BE DRAFTED IN PREPARATIO FOR THE MILSTONE B DECISION

ENSURE INCORPORATION OF CONDITION BASED MAINTENANCE PLUS (CBM+)D220, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), Interactive Electronic Technical Manuals (IETMS), Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS), Core Automated Maintenance System (CAMS), Joint Engineering Data Management Information Control System (JEDMICS), Advance Planning System (APS, Expeditionary Combat Support System (ECSS)


AFI 63-101, AFI 63-1201, DoDI 4151, AFPD 63-14, DoDI 4151.22

System Requirements, ICD, CDD, CPD, SEP, LCMP, Functional Baseline

Acquisition Lead, Systems Engineering , Sustainment Engineering

Inputs to SEP, LCMP, System Specification, Aircraft Information Program

IPT Meeting with Government and Contractor engineers on supportability/RCM/SORAP/FMECA analysis and prognostic data needs


Minimize life cycle cost while maximizing system readiness through the performance of just in time maintenance and inspections

DEVELOP A DIMINSHING MANUFACTURING SOURCES AND MATERIAL SHORTAGES (DMSMS) PROGRAMShared Data Warehouse,

Program initiation, Notification to develop Request for Proposal (RFP)

Engineering Data, Industry Data, Shared Data Warehouse, Government Industry Data Exchange Program (GIDEP) alerts

AFRL/RXME, Program office, Acquisition & Sustainment Logistician, Contractor, OEM, System and Commodity level engineers, Other DoD Services, DLA

DMSMS program, Engineering resolution projects

Advanced Component Obsolescence Management (AVCOM)

AFRL/RXME, Program office, Acquisition & Sustainment Logistician, Contractor, OEM, System and Commodity level engineers, Other DoD Services, DLA

DEVELOP SUPPLY SUPPORT STRATEGY D220, D200, D155, D035, D043, D0143C, DSOR, D040 WSSP workbench, D169, DoD eMall

Acquisition Strategy Panel, Request for Proposal, ICD, CDD, EMA

AFMAN 23-110, DoD 4100.39M Vol II, DoD 4160.21M, Title 10 USC

Contractor Data, User Requirements, Contract, Provisioning Parts List (PPL), DLA data, CONOPS

Program office, Acquistion Logistician, Contractor, OEM, Other DoD Services, DLA, AFMC/A4SM, ALC, SSM

Provisioning Item Order (PIO), Contract, Spares, Requirements / general data to DLA,

Provisioning Conference, SORAP, PBL, Program reviews

Quarterly computation cycle

Program office, Acquistion Logistician, Contractor, OEM, Other DoD Services, DLA, AFMC/A4SM, ALC, SSM

WSSP data to DLA, Updated policy and guidance,

ADDRESS THE NEED FOR A FACILITIES REQUIREMENTS PLAN IN THE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP)Pre Award Information Exchange System (PIXS) ConWrite FEDBIZOPS




ALC and Product Center logisticians

Defined/Approved Request for Proposal (RFP) Supportability Requirements, CDRLs


ALC and Product Center logisticians; Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO)

ADDRESS MAINTENANCE PLANNINGINCLUDE DATA RIGHTS IN THE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP)


Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); Data Rights memo, UID Regulations

Data Rights, UID requirements

Defined/Approved Request for Proposal (RFP) Data Rights and UID Requirements


Logisticians, Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO)




ENSURE COMPLETION OF THE STRATEGIC SOURCE OF REPAIR (SSOR) PROCESS

Source of Repair Assignment Process (SORAP) POC receives Candidate Depot/Core analysis and other Service Interest from Maintenance Specialists (HQ AFMC/A4BC)

SECAF Policy Memo (pending - currently at HQ AFMC/A4 for coord); AFI 63-107; Source of Repair Assignment Process (SORAP) Implementation Guide; HQ staffing guidance

AF Candidate Depot/Core analysis; Other Pertinent analysis (for example, 50/50, other DoD Service interest)

HQ AFMC/CC, A4, and HQ Staff

Strategic AF depot SOR Determination; Other DoD Service interest


HQ AFMC/CC and/or A4, HQ Staff; Estimated persons hours: 60 hours

Annual review of current guidance; updates

INCLUDE LOGISTICS ACTIVITIES IN THE INTEGRATED MASTER PLAN / INTEGRATED MASTER SCHEDULE (IMP/IMS)








E2


K2


L2


M2


N2


O2


P2


5 OF 159

TASK DESCRIPTION

IT S

ys

tem

s

TR

IGG

ER

CO

NT

RO

LS

INP

UT

OU

TP

UT

ME

CH

AN

ISM

S

CY

CL

E T

IME

SD

D (

INT

EG

RA

TIO

N)

PL

AN

SU

PP

OR

T

DE

SIG

N S

UP

PO

RT

FIE

LD

SU

PP

OR

T

MA

INT

AIN

PR

OD

UC

TS

IMP

RO

VE

PR

OD

UC

TS

RE

TIR

E P

RO

DU

CT

S

OR

G/P

LA

YE

RS

SA

F,

HQ

, L

OG

RE

SO

UR

CE

S

CO

NS

UM

ED

IMP

RO

VE

ME

NT

O

PP

OR

TU

NIT

IES

CO

NC

EP

T

RE

FIN

EM

EN

T

TE

CH

NO

LO

GY

D

EV

EL

OP

ME

NT

SD

D

(D

EM

ON

ST

RA

TIO

N)

PR

OD

UC

TIO

N &

D

EP

LO

YM

EN

T

OP

ER

AT

ION

S &

S

UP

PO

RT

DE

TE

RM

INE

S

UP

PO

RT

R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

TS

DE

VE

LO

P &

AC

QU

IRE

S

UP

PO

RT

MA

NA

GE

C

AP

AB

ILIT

IES

PARTICIPATE IN SOURCE SELECTION 180 days

X X

N/A DoDI 5000.2

X X

X

X X

STAND UP PROGRAM OFFICE WITH LOGISTICS PERSONNEL Pre-M/S B Manpower, facilities

X X

Manpower

X X

N/A Manpower

X X

N/A Program Office stand-up Manpower

X X

N/A Program Milestones Manpower

X X

PARTICIPATE IN RISK MANAGEMENT N/A Manpower

X X

PARTICIPATE IN CONTRACT OVERSIGHT AND REVIEW N/A Contract Award Program Team Manpower

X X

X X

System deficiency TO 00-35D-54 Disposition or correction

X X

N/A MIL HDBK 61A, EIA 649 Disposition

X X

AFMCI 23-101 Updated policy and guidance,

X X

Milestone A decision

X X

Source Selection Manpower

X X

AFMC LSO/LOP 6-9 months

X X

Pre-Source Selection AFI 63-101, AFI 63-107 Manpower

X X




EZ Source, Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS)S Navy System

Schedule in Source Selection Plan (SSP)

Source Selection ROE, Source Selection Plan (SSP), Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)

Source Selection Criteria/Standards (Sec L&M of Request for Proposal (RFP)); Source Selection Plan (SSP); Contractor Proposal



Source Selection ROE, Source Selection Plan (SSP), Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), Templates, EZ Source


PREPARE DOCUMENTATION FOR MILESTONE DECISION AUTHORITY (MDA) REVIEW (OLD MILESTONE B)Concept Decision Point Review by Milestone Decision Authority (MDA)

Documentation Required by DoDI 5000.2

Milestone Decision Authority (MDA), Whatever Acquisition Leads identified, AF/A5, MAJCOM Requirements Organizations

Approval to Proceed Into Concept Refinement Phase

Milestone Decision Authority (MDA) Led Meeting

MILESTONE DECISION AUTHORITY (MDA) REVIEW (OLD MILESTONE B)

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT DIRECTIVE (PMD) ISSUED INCLUDING SUPPORTABILITY REQUIREMENTS

Sustainment / Acquisition Composite Model (SACOM), CMS (INPUT)

Program Management Directive (PMD) or SAF/AQ direction, M/S B

AFI 63-101, Sustainment/Acquisition Composite Model (SACOM)

Product Support Concept, Sustainment Strategy

Program Manager (PM), Depot Supportability Manager (DSM), System Supportability Manager (SSM), and supporting Centers

Program Office Org structure, Manpower positions & personnel

Core "XR" group expanded to effectively execute Acq + Supp strategies

More interdependency between acquisition and logistics centers

AWARD SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION CONTRACT

Navy Air Force Interface (NAFI)

Final Evaluation Briefing and Source Selection Authority (SSA) Decision

Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), Acq Strategy and Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) (ACAT I & II rqmt), Source Selection Plan

Capability Development Document (CDD), Request for Proposal (RFP)

System Program Manager (SPM), Program Executive Officer (PEO), Source Selection Authority (SSA)

System Development & Demonstration (SDD) Contract

Source Selection process

Capability Development Document (CDD) --> Source Selection Authority (SSA) decision

Early identification of product support strategy and integration of appropriate support center personnel in Capability Development Document (CDD) development and System Development & Demonstration (SDD) source selection process

ENSURE WEAPON SYSTEM PROGRAM COMPLIES WITH AIR FORCE POLICY FOR NO NEW SOFTWARE SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT WITHOUT AF/CIO APPROVAL


Establishment of ACAT Program

Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP); Integrated Prod Support Planning (AFI 63-107); Log Support Readiness Rqmt (AFI 10-602); System Metric & Reporting Tool (SMART)

Acquisition Program Baseline (APB); Capabilities Document; Funding Expectations; Risk Identification, Strategies and Acceptance; Changes in expectations relating to cost, schedule and performance; support strategy and sustainment.

SAF/AQ, Program Executive Officer (PEO); Acquisition Program Office and Warfighter (User)

Expectation Management Agreement (EMA) and executable program

Face to face meetings; VTCs; Telecons

At establishment of ACAT program and at a minimum, an annual review thereafter

Increased credibility in the acquisition system

INCLUDE SUPPORTABILITY REQUIREMENTS IN DEFENSE CONTRACTS MANAGEMENT AGENCY (DCMA) MEMORANDUM of AGREEMENT (MOA)

Product Support Concept, Sustainment Strategy, Program Office - Defense Contracts Management Agency (DCMA) capability discussions

Depot Supportability Manager (DSM), System Supportability Manager (SSM), and applicable Defense Contracts Management Agency (DCMA) office

Memorandum of Agreement (MOA)

Conduct Program Office - Defense Contracts Management Agency (DCMA) discussions matching Product Support concept & Sustainment strategy with Defense Contracts Management Agency (DCMA) capabilities. Capture agreements in Memorandum of Agreement (MOA)

Program Office stand-up to first Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) deliverable

Integrate Defense Contracts Management Agency (DCMA) into the acquisition team as early as possible. Insure supportability, besides the typical cost/schedule/performance criteria, is highlighted as a watch area.


Program planning; Proposal Preparation; Source Selection; Sole Source Negotiation; Program Execution

Entry/Exit Criteria - measurable indicators; Critical Path

Work Breakdown Structure; Statement of Work (SOW); EVMS data; Technical Data - Key Performance Parameters

Government and Contractor Personnel

Roadmap; Integrated product development and systems integration; Efficient method for evaluating maturity of the program

Post Award Conference; Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS)/Award Fee; What If Exercises

Improved program and project insight by both Government and Contractor personnel; Decreased risk; Increased probability of program success

Acquisition Strategy development

5000.1, Risk Mgmt Guide for DoD

Program technical assessment, market research, past experience

User, Program Office, Support Center, and Contractor (If already on contract). ACE assistance is available

Integrated Risk Assessment and on-going risk management

Complete a Team risk assessment and follow-up with risk management plans to address significant known risks

Pre-Source Selection through the end of the program

Enlarge the Team completing the assessment, utilize ACE tools and insight, and follow through with active risk management. This active management can include incorporating risk management plans into the Integrated Master Schedule

Contract, Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)

Contract requirements (Statement of Work (SOW), Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s, Contract Line Item Number (CLIN)s, and special clauses)

- Program understanding- Successful program execution- Contract & award fee payments- Possible corrective actions and penalties

IPT integrating various Govt and contractor organizations, focused on program success. Generally utilize progress measurement tools, such as EVM, IMS, Key Performance Parameters (KPP)s, to focus attention on problem areas; plus Risk assessment to help avert up-coming pitfalls

Contract award to end of program

Enlarge and thoroughly integrate the cross-functional IPT overseeing the contract. Insure automated, integrated tools are available to all Team members.

ACCOMPLISH SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (SE) GUIDANCE CONFERENCE

PROVIDE LOGISTICS SUPPORT DURING THE DEFICIENCY REPORTING (DR) PROCESSG021, Joint Deficiency Reporting System (JDRS)

Submission of Deficiency Report

Product & Logistics Centers, MAJCOMS, Contractors

Deficiency Review Board, Materiel Improvement Process, Joint Deficiency Reporting System (JDRS)

Product / Logistics Center, Contractors, MAJCOM (Operators & Maintainers)

Improved Weapon System operations, performance and support

PARTICIPATE IN THE CONFIGURATON CONTROL BOARDS (CCB) Any Change Proposal required to meet the Configuration Control Board (CCB)

Change proposal, Support considerations


Approved Configuration Management Process



ACCOMPLISH SPARES PROVISIONING GUIDANCE CONFERENCE Acquisition Strategy Panel, Contract

Contractor Data, User Requirements, Contract, Provisioning Parts List (PPL), DLA data, CONOPS, Initial Provisioning Performance Specification (IPPS)

Program office, Acquistion Logistician, Contractor, OEM, Other DoD Services if joint, DLA, ALC, SSM, MAJCOM, Vendors

Approved AFMC Form 718 Provisioning Performance Schedule, Official minutes, any required contract modifications

PBL, Program reviews, warranties

Program office, Acquistion Logistician, Contractor, OEM, Other DoD Services, DLA, ALC, SSM, MAJCOM, Vendors

ESTABLISH PERIODIC LOGISTICS PLANNING MEETINGS

IMP/IMS, ILS Plan, Contract DoD 5000.2, AFI 63-107, AFI 63-101

ICD, CDD, Funding, CDRLs,

Prod/Log Centers, Contractor, MAJCOMs, DLA, HQ AFMC, Other Services and Agencies as required

Minutes, Action Items, Program Documentation

MS Office, face to face meetings, TDY

Prod/Log Centers, Contractor, MAJCOMs, DLA, HQ AFMC, Other Services and Agencies as required

Establishing this early AND having them meet

ADVOCATE LOGISTICS ENGINEERING DESIGN CHANGES & TRADE STUDIES (NON-DESTRUCTIVE INSPECTION (NDI), CORROSION, HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, PRECIOUS METALS)

Environmental Safety and Occupational Health (ESOH)

Contract, AFPD 20-5, AFPD 63-1, DODI 5000.2, AFI 63-107, ILA

Contract requirements, sound system engineering practices

Most cost effective, logistically supportable end product

Day-to-day involvement with technical team, active participation in technical and program reviews, and participate in configuration control board process

Source Selection to end of program

Enlarge and thoroughly integrate the cross-functional IPT participating in technical decisions. Insure all Team members are aware of design changes and their long-term impacts.

CONTACT AFMC/LSO FOR FEE-FOR-SERVICE PACKAGING SUPPORT (FOR DEVELOPMENT OF SPECIALIZED CONTAINERS FOR TESTING)

Specialized item, fragile item, item without existing packaging, contractor notification, field requests

Funding (fee-for-service), tech orders, DoD regulations, international regulations, HAZMAT

Technical data, physical item, funding, engineering support

Prototype specialized containers, test report, container drawings

Disciplined engineering process

Funding, metals, plastics, gases, water, items

BASELINE PS STRATEGY IN LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT PLAN (LCMP) (PERFORMANCE-BASED LOGISTICS , PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS (PPP), LOG ELEMENTS, ETC)Logistics Planning and Requirements System (LOGPARS) Army System

Product Support Concept, Sustainment Strategy, available resources, product and maintenance structure maturity

Program Team, Depot Supportability Manager (DSM), System Supportability Manager (SSM), Program Manager (PM), and Milestone Decision Authority (MDA)

Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP)

Integrate experience, product support concept, sustainment strategy, and program acquisition strategy

REVIEW REQUIREMENT DOCUMENT/ CAPABILITY OBJECTIVE (CDD)










REFINE ALTERNATIVE FOR PRODUCT SUPPORT STRATEGY





E2


K2


L2


M2


N2


O2


P2


6 OF 159

TASK DESCRIPTION

IT S

ys

tem

s

TR

IGG

ER

CO

NT

RO

LS

INP

UT

OU

TP

UT

ME

CH

AN

ISM

S

CY

CL

E T

IME

SD

D (

INT

EG

RA

TIO

N)

PL

AN

SU

PP

OR

T

DE

SIG

N S

UP

PO

RT

FIE

LD

SU

PP

OR

T

MA

INT

AIN

PR

OD

UC

TS

IMP

RO

VE

PR

OD

UC

TS

RE

TIR

E P

RO

DU

CT

S

OR

G/P

LA

YE

RS

SA

F,

HQ

, L

OG

RE

SO

UR

CE

S

CO

NS

UM

ED

IMP

RO

VE

ME

NT

O

PP

OR

TU

NIT

IES

CO

NC

EP

T

RE

FIN

EM

EN

T

TE

CH

NO

LO

GY

D

EV

EL

OP

ME

NT

SD

D

(D

EM

ON

ST

RA

TIO

N)

PR

OD

UC

TIO

N &

D

EP

LO

YM

EN

T

OP

ER

AT

ION

S &

S

UP

PO

RT

DE

TE

RM

INE

S

UP

PO

RT

R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

TS

DE

VE

LO

P &

AC

QU

IRE

S

UP

PO

RT

MA

NA

GE

C

AP

AB

ILIT

IES

UPDATE RISK ASSESSMENT FOR ALTERNATIVE Pre-Source Selection AFI 63-101, AFI 63-107 Manpower

UPDATE COST ESTIMATE FOR ALTERNATIVE Pre-Source Selection AFI 63-101, AFI 63-107 Manpower





Contract Award 60 days

X X

Contract Award Formal Technical Orders

X X

3.19.1.1

3.19.1.2 START TECHNICAL ORDER DEVELOPMENT

3.19.1.3

3.19.1.4

3.19.1.5

3.19.1.6 REVIEW PRE-PUBSN/A Approved Form 9

X X

N/A Approved Form 10

X X

N/A AFI 36-2251 up to 10 years

X X X X X X X

N/A 60 days

X X

PARTICIPATE IN SYSTEMS ENGINEERING PLAN (SEP) UPDATE N/A Manpower

X X


X X

N/AX X


X X

N/A Pre-M/S C Air Force ILA Handbook ILA Manpower

X X

N/A 3-12 months

X X

N/A X X

N/AX X









UPDATE WRITING OF LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT PLAN (LCMP) (if req'd)










APPROVE PRODUCT SUPPORT STRATEGY (SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS REVIEW (SRR) ASP)





FINALIZE LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT PLAN (LCMP) BASED ON ACQUISITION STRATEGY PANEL (ASP) RECOMMENDATIONS





EVALUATE AND MAINTAIN LOGISTICS SUPPORTABILITY DATA D220, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), Interactive Electronic Technical Manuals (IETMS), Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS), Core Automated Maintenance System (CAMS), Joint Engineering Data Management Information Control System (JEDMICS), Seer

Contract and Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s

Contract, Supportability Plan, Program Schedule; applicable program plans, reports and briefings

Program Office, ALCs, Prime Contractor, MAJCOMS

Update Supportability Plan

Meetings with Govt and prime, plans, schedule and contract

Program Office, ALC, Prime Contractor

MANAGE TECHNICAL ORDER ACQUISITION PROGRAM Joint Computer Aided Acquisition and Logistics Support (JCALS), Electronic Technical Order Management System (ETOMS)

Contract and Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s Technical Order Management Plan (TOMP), TO 00-5-3, Technical Manual Contract Requirements (TMCR) Document TM-86-01, AFI 61-204, MIL-PRF 32216, Technical Order Verification Plan (TOVP), TO 00-5-18, AFI31-303, AFI 65-601 Vol. 1


Program Office, ALCs, Prime Contractor, MAJCOMS, Technical Order Manager

Meetings with Govt and prime, plans, schedule and contract Validation and Verification

Program Office, ALC, Prime Contractor, MAJCOMs, Technical Order Manager

Digital T.O.s, Interactive Electronic Technical Manuals (IETMS)

CONDUCT TECHNICAL ORDER GUIDANCE CONFERENCE

CONDUCT TECHNICAL ORDER IN PROCESS REVIEWS (IPR)s

REFINE TECHNICAL ORDER MANAGEMENT PLAN

FINALIZE TECHNICAL ORDER VERIFICATION PLAN (TOVP)

EVALUATE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT REQUIREMENTS DOCUMENT (SERD) (PECULIAR SE, COMMON SE, TO, SPARES, TRAINING, PRECISION MEASUREMENT EQUIPMENT LABORATORY (PMEL) REQUIREMENTS

Contractor Support Equipment Requirements Document (SERD) list





REVIEW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT REQUIREMENTS DOCUMENT (SERD) FOR DEPOT ACTIVATION (DMAWG)

Contractor Support Equipment Requirements Document (SERD) list





ESTABLISH AND MANAGE TRAINING SYSTEMS Weapons platform contract award or requirements

Training Systems Requirements Analysis (TSRA), Capability Development Document (CDD)

Program office, MAJCOM, prime contractor

Guaranteed student training capability

Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP), contract requirements

Program office personnel, contractors, MAJCOM, dollars, ALC

IDENTIFY & PLAN SUPPORTABILITY REQUIREMENTS FOR THE TEST & EVALUATION MASTER PLAN (TEMP) Notification update required

Test & Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP) Guidelines

DT&E/OA assessment, Supportability Requirements, Test Requirements

ALC and Program Office logisticians

Updated Test & Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP)

Test & Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP) template

Logisticians, Engineer, Test Org

SAF/AQ Policy Memo 05A-001, 7 Oct 05, Attachment 2 and the Systems Engineering Planning Effort in Concept Refinement Phase

Reference DAG Sect 4.5.1, "Approach for Systems Engineering Plan (SEP) Updates" (site was down when attempted to access)

Government/Contractor Personnel

Fully coordinated Systems Engineering Plan (SEP) which is fundamental for technical and program execution

Update annually or as requested by Program Executive Officer (PEO)/Milestone Decision Authority (MDA)

Development of a structured process that proceeds from concept to production to operation.

REFINE SUPPORTABILITY REQUIREMENTS IN THE SYSTEM PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION




PARTICIPATE IN SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS REVIEW (SRR) (SYSTEMS FUNCTIONAL SPEC)

CONTINUE TO EVALUATE CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS SUPPORTABILITY DATA (INCLUDING COMMERCIAL OFF THE SHELF (COTS) & CONTRACT DATA REQUIREMENTS LIST (CDRL)s) (LEVEL OF REPAIR ANALYSIS (LORA), MAINTENANCE TASK ANALYSIS (MTA), RELIABILITY CENTERED MAINTENANCE (RCM), MAINTENANCE, ETC)

D220, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), Interactive Electronic Technical Manuals (IETMS), Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS), Core Automated Maintenance System (CAMS), Joint Engineering Data Management Information Control System (JEDMICS), Seer







SUPPORT INDEPENDENT LOGISTICS ASSESSMENT (ILA) AND TAKE CORRECTIVE ACTION

Current program documentation, such as Initial Capabilities Document (ICD)/Capability Development Document (CDD)/Capability Production Document (CPD), Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP), contracts, Integrated Master Plan / Integrated Master Schedule (IMP/IMS), EVMS data, technical and logistics performance measures

Program Executive Officer (PEO), Program Manager (PM), Depot Supportability Manager (DSM), System Supportability Manager (SSM), Program Office, ILA Evaluation Team

Compile input data, plus an overview program presentation. After the ILA Evaluation Team is familiar with program, provide cross-functional discussions with evaluation members. Evaluation team completes draft ILA and Program Office then has opportunity to comment and/or make corrections. Then Final ILA is submitted.

Approximately 3 months prior to M/S C, to be complete by M/S C

Provide the ILA Evaluation team all the input data up-front, including a good program overview briefing and program organization chart with phone & email contact information. Insure the entire Program team is aware of the ILA intent and scope. Involve a good cross-functional program team to support the ILA.

EVALUATE PROTOTYPE / ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT MODEL FOR SUPPORTABILITY

Contractual deliveries, test plan, Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP), Integrated Master Plan / Integrated Master Schedule (IMP/IMS)

Systems Engineering Plan, test plan, Test & Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP), technology readiness model

Dollars, test facility, Systems Engineering Plan, test plan, Test & Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP), technology readiness model

Contractor, Program office, ALC, Air Force Operational Test and Evaluation Center (AFOTEC), MAJCOM

Technical data, test report, technology readiness levels, supportability data, Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM) info, risk reduction plan

Early operational evaluation, test instructions and procedures, manufacturing readiness levels, system engineering assessment model, Probability of program success (POPS)

Dollars and manpower to execute the technology, MAJCOM, ALC, Program Office and Prime Contractor

PARTICIPATE IN SYSTEM FUNCTIONAL REVIEW (SFR)

PARTICIPATE IN PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW (PDR)

E2


K2


L2


M2


N2


O2


P2


7 OF 159

TASK DESCRIPTION

IT S

ys

tem

s

TR

IGG

ER

CO

NT

RO

LS

INP

UT

OU

TP

UT

ME

CH

AN

ISM

S

CY

CL

E T

IME

SD

D (

INT

EG

RA

TIO

N)

PL

AN

SU

PP

OR

T

DE

SIG

N S

UP

PO

RT

FIE

LD

SU

PP

OR

T

MA

INT

AIN

PR

OD

UC

TS

IMP

RO

VE

PR

OD

UC

TS

RE

TIR

E P

RO

DU

CT

S

OR

G/P

LA

YE

RS

SA

F,

HQ

, L

OG

RE

SO

UR

CE

S

CO

NS

UM

ED

IMP

RO

VE

ME

NT

O

PP

OR

TU

NIT

IES

CO

NC

EP

T

RE

FIN

EM

EN

T

TE

CH

NO

LO

GY

D

EV

EL

OP

ME

NT

SD

D

(D

EM

ON

ST

RA

TIO

N)

PR

OD

UC

TIO

N &

D

EP

LO

YM

EN

T

OP

ER

AT

ION

S &

S

UP

PO

RT

DE

TE

RM

INE

S

UP

PO

RT

R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

TS

DE

VE

LO

P &

AC

QU

IRE

S

UP

PO

RT

MA

NA

GE

C

AP

AB

ILIT

IES


X X

UPDATE DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED FOR NEW MILESTONE B N/A Program Data 180 days

X X

UPDATE COST ESTIMATES FOR SUPPORTABILITY 3-6 months

X X

Production Document Regulations Budget cycle

X X

*NEW MILESTONE B DECISION XN/A Notification of Review

X X

N/A

X X

N/A 30 work days

X X

N/A 40 work days

X X

N/A 80 work days

X X

ENSURE FACILITY CONSTRUCTION ON TRACK N/A On going

X X

Instructions and Policy

X X

N/A Notification of Review

X X

ESTABLISH TECHNICAL ORDER PRODUCT BASELINE

N/A Notification of Review Approved Design 90 days (non OSD)

X X

ANNOTATE THE PRODUCT SUPPORT CAPABILITIES N/A Assessment Data

X X

N/A 120 days

X X


X X

CMS 365 days

X X

N/A Notification of Review Contract T&C, 60

X X

X X

N/A DT&E and OA Data 45 days

X X

CONTINUE TO EVALUATE CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS SUPPORTABILITY DATA (INCLUDING COMMERCIAL OFF THE SHELF (COTS) & CONTRACT DATA REQUIREMENTS LIST (CDRL)s) (LEVEL OF REPAIR ANALYSIS (LORA), MAINTENANCE TASK ANALYSIS (MTA), RELIABILITY CENTERED MAINTENANCE (RCM), MAINTENANCE, ETC)

D220, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), Interactive Electronic Technical Manuals (IETMS), Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS), Core Automated Maintenance System (CAMS), Joint Engineering Data Management Information Control System (JEDMICS), Seer







Upcoming milestone decision

Milestone Decision ROE, Templates

PM Team (Program Manager (PM), Depot Supportability Manager (DSM), System Supportability Manager (SSM)); Wing Commander; Product Center, AFMC, SAF and OSD Staff; Program Executive Officer (PEO); SAE; ALC Commander; Customer

Documentation Complete

Milestone Decision Templates; CAGS; Action Officers

PM Team (Program Manager (PM), DSM, System Supportability Manager (SSM)); Wing Commander; Product Center, AFMC, SAF and OSD Staff; Program Executive Officer (PEO); SAE; ALC Commander; Customer

Reduction inTotal Ownership Cost (RTOC), ATOC

AFIs governing costs, preparation for new milestone B, update program schedule

Costs, AFIs and procedures

Contractor data, Program Objective Memorandum (POM) data, engineering evaluation, DoD cost model, inflation rates and procedures

Financial managers, product centers, ALCs, Air Force Center for cost analysis, MAJCOM, HQ AFMC

Program Office Estimate (POE), Lifecycle cost estimate, budget estimates

Dollars and manpower. ALCs, MAJCOMs, Program Office

Financial managers, product centers, ALCs, Air Force Center for cost analysis, MAJCOM, HQ AFMC

DEVELOP PRODUCTION DOCUMENT FOR SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (SE) (USED FOR FORECASTING)

Program schedule, funding

AF Regulations, budget drill, Program Objective Memorandum (POM) drill, contract

Contract, funding, schedule

Program office personnel, ALC, MAJCOM

COMPLETE SUPPORTABILITY REPORTING TEMPLATE FOR ALL PROGRAM EXECUTIVE OFFICER (PEO) REVIEWS

Agenda; Meeting ROE; Program Executive Officer (PEO) Review Template

Program Executive Officer (PEO) Review Template, Program Data


Completed Briefing Charts

CAGS, Action Officers, CoP, System Metric & Reporting Tool (SMART), Templates

2 x per year, 2 months per each occurrence from notice of review to review held; 140 man-hours per program

CAG, PEG, Front Office Group (FOG), PM Team, Air Staff Action Officer, AFMC Action Officer, Program Executive Officer (PEO), ALC Commander, Customer, SAE


Receipt of Customer Requirement; annual update in conjunction with Program Management Directive (PMD) update

Expectation Management Agreement (EMA) Guide; System Metric & Reporting Tool (SMART) Guidelines

Customer Requirements; discussions/agreements with customer; contract terms and conditions; Expectation Management Agreement (EMA) Guidelines

Customer (Operator, Maintainer and designated SES/GO); Program Manager (PM) / Depot Supportability Manager (DSM) / System Supportability Manager (SSM); Program Executive Officer (PEO), ALC Commander


Meetings; System Metric & Reporting Tool (SMART) System, Guide

minimum once per year. Initial Expectation Management Agreement (EMA): 6 months, 160 man-hours; follow-on Expectation Management Agreement (EMA)s 2 months; 60 man-hours

PM Team, Customer, PEG, CAG, Program Executive Officer (PEO), ALC Commander, Customer Staff

INITIATE DEPOT SOURCE OF REPAIR (DSOR) PROCESS AND THE DEPOT MAINTENANCE INTERSERVICING (DMI) IF THIS IS FIRST ACQUISITION DECISION POINT

Exit Milestone A - System Program Manager (SPM)s/PGMs Initiate within 30 days after MS A to HQ AFMC/A4BC (Source of Repair Assignment Process (SORAP) POC)

SECA Policy Memo (pending - currently at HQ AFMC/A4 for coord); AFI 63-107; Source of Repair Assignment Process (SORAP) Implementation Guide

Program data to fill in Template A, Phase 1 data elements


Request for candidate depot/core analyses; Template A, Phase 1 data


System Program Manager (SPM)s, PGMs; Estimated person hours: 4 hours


ENSURE DETERMINATION OF CORE & ASSIGN CANDIDATE DEPOT (REF NEW SOURCE OF REPAIR ASSIGNMENT PROCESS (SORAP)) IF THIS IS THE FIRST ACQUISITION DECISION POINT

Receipt of Request for Candidate Depot/Core from Source of Repair Assignment Process (SORAP) POC

Title 10 2464; Biennial Core Report; TRC Designations Document

Phase 1, Template A data; Request Memo; TRC Designations document; 10 USC 2464; Biennial Review (to include any analyses done); Miscellaneous additional info (for example, web or other research)

Maintenance Specialists (HQ AFMC/A4BC)

Strategic Core Assessment and Candidate AF Depot Determination to Source of Repair Assignment Process (SORAP) POC (HQ AFMC/A4BC)


Maintenance Specialists (HQ AFMC/A4BC)


ACCOMPLISH SOURCE OF REPAIR ASSIGNMENT PROCESS (SORAP)

Source of Repair Assignment Process (SORAP) POC receives Candidate Depot/Core analysis and other Service Interest from Maintenance Specialists (HQ AFMC/A4BC)

SECAF Policy Memo (pending - currently at HQ AFMC/A4 for coord); AFI 63-107; Source of Repair Assignment Process (SORAP) Implementation Guide; HQ staffing guidance

AF Candidate Depot/Core analysis; Other Pertinent analysis (for example, 50/50, other DoD Service interest)

HQ AFMC/CC, A4, and HQ Staff

Strategic AF depot Source of Repair Determination; Other DoD Service interest


HQ AFMC/CC and/or A4, HQ Staff; Estimated persons hours: 60 hours


ENSURE WEAPON SYSTEM SUPPORT PROGRAM (WSSP) ACCOMPLISHED – WEAPON SYSTEM DESIGNATOR CODE (WSDC) – Merry to provide post Feb 08 RIED040 WSSP workbench,

Decision to use DLA parts

AFMAN 23-110 Vol 1, Part1 Chap 11AK

MILCON budget, facilities plan,

AFI 32-9005, AFI 10-503, AFI 10-501, AFI 16-403, MILCON process

Site survey, program schedule, MAJCOM direction, contractor recommendations, environmental impact statement, program environmental safety health evaluation (PESHE)

Program office, MAJCOM, contractor, base civil engineer

facilities plan, MILCON budget, physical buildings, environmental impact statement, environmental study,

AFI 32-9005, AFI 10-503, AFI 10-501, AFI 16-403, MILCON process

Program office, MAJCOM, contractor, base civil engineer, dollars

EVALUATE AND MAINTAIN LOGISTICS SUPPORTABILITY DATA Contractor systems, Legacy Logistics IT systems (EITDR), Product Life Cycle Management (PLM),

Organic & Contract Data generation

Applicable IT systems in use

Data, information, requirements

Product & Logistics Centers, Contractors, MAJCOMS

Various reports, analysis output

Product & Logistics Centers, Contractors, MAJCOMS

Better weapon system oversight & management

PARTICIPATE IN CRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW (CDR) Contract Terms and Conditions and Documentation; CDR ROE

PDR results; Eng Development Models/Prototypes; Proposed Drawings; Refined System Spec; Systems Engineering Data; LMI documentation

Contractor and Government Program Team including Logisticians; Customer Reps including Maintainers; Test Org

Approved Specs and Drawings; Functional Baseline; Updated Systems Engineering/LMI data

CDR agenda; Contractor Engineering/Data Systems

75 days (30 days prior for prelim review of data; 45 days after for finalization of minutes, action items, etc)

Contractor and Government PM Team, Customer, Test

PREPARE DOCUMENTATION FOR DESIGN READINESS REVIEW (DRR) Milestone Decision Authority (MDA) Required Documentation/ROE

CDR Results; Capability Development Document (CDD); Updated Acquisition and Product Support Strategy; Test & Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP) plan

PM Team (Program Manager (PM), Depot Supportability Manager (DSM), System Supportability Manager (SSM)); Wing Commander; Product Center, AFMC, SAF and OSD Staff; Program Executive Officer (PEO); SAE; ALC Commander; Customer; Test Org


CAG, PEG, Front Office Group (FOG), PM Team, Air Staff Action Officer, AFMC Action Officer, Program Executive Officer (PEO), ALC Commander, Customer, SAE; OSD Staff

Approved DRR; System ready for demonstration

Contract Terms and Conditions and Documentation; System Demo ROE

Revised Sys Eng and LMI Data; Test Data/Reports; Test Plans and Procedures; System Demo Articles


Test Articles, Test Procedures and Plan, Assessment Templates

75 days (30 days prior for prelim review of data; 45 days after demo for finalization of assessment, action items, etc)

Contractor and Government PM Team, Customer, Test

UPDATING SUPPORTABILITY REQUIREMENTS IN COST ANALYSIS REQUIREMENT DESCRIPTION (CARD), PROGRAM OFFICE ESTIMATE (POE), COMPONENT COST ANALYSIS (CCA), INDEPENDENT COST ESTIMATE (ICE), AFFORDABILITY ASSESSMENT

Validated Functional Design

Cost Analysis Requirement Description (CARD), Program Office Estimate (POE), Component Cost Analysis (CCA), ICE, Affordability Assessment Regulations

Previous Cost Estimates, Funding Profile; Customer Budget; Program Changes

PM Team; Customer; AFMC/AF/OSD/Customer FM

Updated Funding profile; Funding disconnects

Established Guidance for processing these documents

PM Team; Customer; AFMC/AF/OSD/Customer FM

INCLUDE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (SE) IN LIFE CYCLE COST DOCUMENTS INCLUDING REPLACEMENT COSTS


Supportability Concept, Plan, Cost Oriented Resource Estimating (CORE), technical data, any support equipment available, cost data

Cost Analysis Requirement Description (CARD), Program Office Estimate (POE), Component Cost Analysis (CCA), ICE, Affordability Assessment, ensure that support equipment replacement costs are included



CONTINUE PROGRAM OBJECTIVE MEMORANDUM (POM) INPUTS FOR SUPPORTABILITY REQUIREMENTS

Program Objective Memorandum (POM) Data Call

Program Objective Memorandum (POM) Guidance

Customer Budget; Updated Funding profiles; Updated Funding Disconnects

PM Team; Customer; AFMC/AF/OSD/Customer FM, Program Objective Memorandum (POM) Panels/Boards/Councils

Approved Program Objective Memorandum (POM) inputs

Established Guidance, Program Objective Memorandum (POM) Panels, Boards, Council

PM Team; Customer; AFMC/AF/OSD/Customer FM, Program Objective Memorandum (POM) Panels/Boards/Councils

PARTICIPATE IN TEST READINESS REVIEW (TRR) Detailed Test Plan (including test for supportability), Test & Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP), SPEC, Test Articles


Approval to conduct Test



ENSURE SUPPORT FOR DEVELOPMENTAL TEST AND EVALUATION (DT&E), LIVE FIRE TEST AND EVALUATION (LFT&E), EARLY OPERATIONAL ASSESSMENTS (EOAS), AND OPERATIONAL ASSESSMENTS (OAs)

Notification of DT&E, LFT&E, and OA

Contract T&C; DT&E, LFT&E, OA ROE

Capability Development Document (CDD), Test Plan, Test & Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP), Systems Spec, LMI Data, Supportability Requirements, Test/LF articles

Contractor and Government Program Team including Logisticians; Customer Reps including Maintainers; Test/Live Fire Org

Validated Functional Design; Demonstrated supportability, Demonstrated Live Fire Survivability


Contractor and Government Program Team including Logisticians; Customer Reps including Maintainers; Test/Live Fire Org

ANALYZE DATA FROM DEVELOPMENTAL TEST & EVALUATION (DT&E), EARLY OPERATIONAL ASSESSMENTS (EOAS), AND LIVE FIRE TEST & EVALUATION (LFT&E)

DT&E/OA Data Received

Contract T&C; DT&E, LFT&E, OA ROE

Government Program Team including Logisticians; Customer reps including maintainers; Test Org

Documented results of analysis; action items

Test Procedures and Plan, Assessment Templates

Government Program Team including Logisticians; Customer reps including maintainers; Test Org

E2


K2


L2


M2


N2


O2


P2


8 OF 159

TASK DESCRIPTION

IT S

ys

tem

s

TR

IGG

ER

CO

NT

RO

LS

INP

UT

OU

TP

UT

ME

CH

AN

ISM

S

CY

CL

E T

IME

SD

D (

INT

EG

RA

TIO

N)

PL

AN

SU

PP

OR

T

DE

SIG

N S

UP

PO

RT

FIE

LD

SU

PP

OR

T

MA

INT

AIN

PR

OD

UC

TS

IMP

RO

VE

PR

OD

UC

TS

RE

TIR

E P

RO

DU

CT

S

OR

G/P

LA

YE

RS

SA

F,

HQ

, L

OG

RE

SO

UR

CE

S

CO

NS

UM

ED

IMP

RO

VE

ME

NT

O

PP

OR

TU

NIT

IES

CO

NC

EP

T

RE

FIN

EM

EN

T

TE

CH

NO

LO

GY

D

EV

EL

OP

ME

NT

SD

D

(D

EM

ON

ST

RA

TIO

N)

PR

OD

UC

TIO

N &

D

EP

LO

YM

EN

T

OP

ER

AT

ION

S &

S

UP

PO

RT

DE

TE

RM

INE

S

UP

PO

RT

R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

TS

DE

VE

LO

P &

AC

QU

IRE

S

UP

PO

RT

MA

NA

GE

C

AP

AB

ILIT

IES

N/A 90 days (non OSD)

X X

120 days

X X


X X


X X

PARTICIPATE IN ALTERNATIVE of ACTION (AOA) UPDATE N/AX X


X X

PHS&T data PHS&T data 1-15 days Manpower

X X

30 days Manpower

X X

N/A Logisticians 30 days

X X


X X

N/A ALC and PC logisticians 60 days Logisticians, Engineer

X X

PARTICIPATE IN RISK MANAGEMENT N/A continuous

X X

N/A 180 days

X X

N/A 180 days

X X

N/A

X X

N/A 45 days

X X

PARTICIPATE IN SOURCE SELECTION (LOGISTICIAN) 180 days

X X

N/A ILA Handbook Logistics Data/Status ILA HandbookX X

N/A Program Data 180 days

X X

MILESTONE C DECISION XN/A Milestone C decision AFI's and AFMCI's Migration Plan signed Data system 1-6 months

X X

AWARD LOW RATE INITIAL PRODUCTION (LRIP) CONTRACT Signed contract Award is one day

X X


X X


X X


X X


X X

UPDATE SUPPORTABILITY IN THE ACQUISITION PROGRAM BASELINE (APB)

Time to update Acquisition Program Baseline (APB)

Acquisition Program Baseline (APB) Guidelines

Updated cost, schedule, performance, supportability data; updated Expectation Management Agreement (EMA)s

PM, Program Executive Officer (PEO), PEM, SAF/AQ

Approved updated Acquisition Program Baseline (APB)

Established guidance, Protocol process

PM, Program Executive Officer (PEO), PM, CAGS, SAF/AQ

UPDATE PRODUCT SUPPORT STRATEGY IN LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT PLAN (LCMP)Logistics Planning and Requirements System (LOGPARS) Army System








INCLUDE SUPPORTABILITY IN THE SOURCE SELECTION PLAN (SSP)

Determination of competitive acquisition

Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 15, SS Guides and Template

Risk Assessment Results, Key Supportability Requirements

Approved Source Selection Plan (SSP)

Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), Guides, Templates

PM, Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO), ALC and PC logisticians, Source Selection Plan (SSP) approval chain of command, warfighter


Notification of Acquisition Strategy Panel (ASP)

Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) part 7, Acquisition Strategy Panel (ASP) Guides and Templates, local Acquisition Strategy Panel (ASP) procedures

Risk Assessment Results, Key Supportability Requirements and Strategy

Completed Acquisition Strategy Panel (ASP) Briefing; Action Items Completed

Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), Guides, Templates, Protocol

PM, Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO), ALC and PC logisticians, Acquisition Strategy Panel (ASP) Secretariat and Panel, warfighter

Notification that update is required


DT&E/OA assessment, LMI Data


Completed Alternative of Action (AOA) Update








Defined/Approved Request for Proposal (RFP) Supportability Requirements



COORDINATE WITH ALCs TO ENSURE PACKAGING, HANDLING, STORAGE & TRANSPORTATION (PHS&T) REQUIREMENTS (INCLUDING DATA) ARE ON THE DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT

Pre Award Information Exchange System (PIXS) ConWrite FEDBIZOPS, SIS D035T, Special Packaging Instruction Retrieval & Exchange System (SPIRES), Automated Contract Purchasing System (ACPS)

Program schedule and Request for Proposal (RFP) development

Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), AFMCI 24-201, AFMC Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)S, DoD Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), AF Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)

ALC packaging specialists, ALC transportation specialists, HQ AFMC/A4RD, program office personnel, contractor

Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), AFMCI 24-201, AFMC Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)S, DoD Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), AF Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), AFMC form 158, DD form 1653, SIS D035T, Special Packaging Instruction Retrieval & Exchange System (SPIRES), Automated Contract Purchasing System (ACPS)

PLACE PACKAGING DATA , TRANSPORTATION, AND TRANSPORTABILITY DATA REQUIREMENTS IN THE CONTRACT DATA REQUIREMENTS LIST (CDRL) ON CONTRACT



Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), AFMCI 24-201, AFMC Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), DoD Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), AF Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), MIL STD 129, MIL STD 2073-1

PHS&T data, DI-PACK-80120B/T, DI-PACK-80121B/T


PHS&T data, DI-PACK-80120B/T, DI-PACK-80121B/T

Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), AFMCI 24-201, AFMC Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), DoD Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), AF Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), AFMC form 158, DD form 1653, SIS D035T, Special Packaging Instruction Retrieval & Exchange System (SPIRES), Automated Contract Purchasing System (ACPS)

DEVELOP A TECHNICAL ORDER DATA REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) INCLUDING THE TECHNICAL MANUAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS (TMCR) DOCUMENT TM-86-01



Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); Data Rights memo, UID Regulations

Data Rights, UID requirements

Defined/Approved Request for Proposal (RFP) Data Rights and UID Requirements


Logisticians, Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO)




UPDATE SUPPORTABILITY INPUTS TO THE TEST & EVALUATION MASTER PLAN (TEMP)

Notification update required

Test & Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP) Guidelines

DT&E/OA assessment, Supportability Requirements, Test Requirements

Updated Test & Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP)

Test & Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP) template

Logisticians, Engineer, Test Org

UPDATE SUPPORTABILITY INPUTS TO THE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING PLAN (SEP)

Notification update required

Systems Engineering Plan (SEP) Guidelines, Regulations

Design for Supportability Assessment

Updated Systems Engineering Plan (SEP)

Systems Engineering Plan (SEP) Template

Continuous Risk Mitigation Activities

Risk Management Guidelines

Identified Supportability Risks and Current Assessment

Contractor, ALC and PC logisticians, Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO), Engineers

Updated Risk Status/Mitigation Plans

Meetings with contractor and Govt IPTs

Govt and Contractor Logisticians, Engineers, PM, Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO)

ENSURE SUPPORTABILITY REQUIREMENTS ARE IN THE CAPABILITY PRODUCTION DOCUMENT (CPD)

Capability Production Document (CPD) required

Capability Production Document (CPD) Regulations

DT&E/OA assessment, Supportability Requirements, Updates from User

Warfighter, ALC and PC Logisticians, Engineer, AF/XO

Approved Capability Production Document (CPD)

Capability Production Document (CPD) Template, meetings with warfighter and AF/XO


UPDATE SUPPORTABILITY KEY PERFORMANCE PARAMETERS (KPP)S

Capability Production Document (CPD) required

Capability Production Document (CPD) Regulations

DT&E/OA assessment, Critical Supportability Requirements, Updates from User


Approved Key Performance Parameters (KPP)s

Capability Production Document (CPD) Template, meetings with warfighter and AF/XO


PARTICIPATE IN THE FUNCTIONAL CONFIGURATION AUDIT (FCA) AND MONITOR CORRECTIVE ACTIONS FOR SUPPORTABILITY PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS

PARTICIPATE IN FUNCTIONAL CONFIGURATION AUDIT (FCA), SYSTEM VERIFICATION REVIEW (SVR), PRODUCTION READINESS REVIEW (PRR)









EZ Source, Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS)S Navy System

Schedule in Source Selection Plan (SSP)

Source Selection ROE, Source Selection Plan (SSP), Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)

Source Selection Criteria/Standards (Sec L&M of Request for Proposal (RFP)); Source Selection Plan (SSP); Contractor Proposal



Source Selection ROE, Source Selection Plan (SSP), Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), Templates, EZ Source


SUPPORT INDEPENDENT LOGISTICS ASSESSMENT (ILA) AND TAKE CORRECTIVE ACTION

Upcoming milestone decision

ILA Team, PM Team, Contractor

Completed ILA Assessment; Action Items

ILA Team, PM Team, Contractor

PREPARE DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED FOR MILESTONE C Upcoming milestone decision

Milestone Decision ROE, Templates


Documentation Complete



DEVELOP INITIAL MIGRATION PLAN (AEROSPACE MAINTENANCE and REGENERATION GROUP (AMARG))

Program technical data, planned life, spares data,

Program Office/ALC/Prod Center, AFMC, Aerospace Maintenance and Regeneration Group (AMARG), MAJCOM

Program Office, AFMC, Aerospace Maintenance and Regeneration Group (AMARG), ALC

Publish core items much like Source of Repair Assignment Process (SORAP) plans to do


Source Selection Authority (SSA)/Program Executive Officer (PEO) approval

Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) clause PK regulation

Request for Proposal (RFP), responses, discussions

Program Office/ALC/Prod Center


Contracting officer, PM team, CFO


INCLUDE SUPPORTABILITY REQUIREMENTS IN DEFENSE CONTRACTS MANAGEMENT AGENCY (DCMA) MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT (MOA)






Apply single process initiative philosophy

Details of contract, Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) clauses, AFI's, Contractor, security reqmts


Accepted contract deliverables, briefing charts, studies, reports, System Metric & Reporting Tool (SMART), Management Asset Review (MAR), Defense Acquisition Executive (DAE), Program Executive Officer (PEO) review



Increased risk less oversight/ Navy model

ACCOMPLISH SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (SE) GUIDANCE CONFERENCE













E2


K2


L2


M2


N2


O2


P2


9 OF 159

TASK DESCRIPTION

IT S

ys

tem

s

TR

IGG

ER

CO

NT

RO

LS

INP

UT

OU

TP

UT

ME

CH

AN

ISM

S

CY

CL

E T

IME

SD

D (

INT

EG

RA

TIO

N)

PL

AN

SU

PP

OR

T

DE

SIG

N S

UP

PO

RT

FIE

LD

SU

PP

OR

T

MA

INT

AIN

PR

OD

UC

TS

IMP

RO

VE

PR

OD

UC

TS

RE

TIR

E P

RO

DU

CT

S

OR

G/P

LA

YE

RS

SA

F,

HQ

, L

OG

RE

SO

UR

CE

S

CO

NS

UM

ED

IMP

RO

VE

ME

NT

O

PP

OR

TU

NIT

IES

CO

NC

EP

T

RE

FIN

EM

EN

T

TE

CH

NO

LO

GY

D

EV

EL

OP

ME

NT

SD

D

(D

EM

ON

ST

RA

TIO

N)

PR

OD

UC

TIO

N &

D

EP

LO

YM

EN

T

OP

ER

AT

ION

S &

S

UP

PO

RT

DE

TE

RM

INE

S

UP

PO

RT

R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

TS

DE

VE

LO

P &

AC

QU

IRE

S

UP

PO

RT

MA

NA

GE

C

AP

AB

ILIT

IES

D220, D155, D169 AFMCI 23-101 Updated policy and guidance,

X X

N/A Prod contract award Standard format Prod Center, ALC Program Transfer Chart PowerPoint Program Office/ALCX X

$, billets, authorizations, Program Office/ALC 2-3 years

X X

N/A Contract Award MS Office products 1-3 Months Target Org, Program Office

X X

N/A Format PowerPoint 30 days Program Office, ALC This is huge improvement

X X

N/A 15 days - 60 days Program Office, ALC

X X

N/A Contract Award Format Updated documents 30 days

X X


X X

Contract Award Contract Contract 60 daysX X

N/A Contract Award AFI 10-503

X X

Contract Award AFI 10-503

PERFORM OPERATIONAL BASE SURVEY Contract Award AFI 10-503

DEVELOP SCHEDULE & ACTION ITEMS Contract Award AFI 10-503

COMPLETE ACTION ITEMS & MITIGATION PLAN Contract Award AFI 10-503

EXECUTE SUPPORT PLAN (Ref 4.6.2.1 - 4.6.2.9 APAT) Contract Award AFI 10-503

ACCEPT ASSETS DELIVERY Contract Award AFI 10-503


ACQUIRE INITIAL SUPPLY SUPPORT N/A Contract Award 12 Mos

X X

EXECUTE CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS Contract Award 12 Mos

MONITOR CONTRACTOR SPARES PROGRESS Contract Award 12 Mos

MONITOR CONTRACTOR DELIVERY Contract Award 12 Mos

ACCOMPLISH SPARES PROVISIONING CONFERENCE Acquisition Strategy Panel, Contract, Provisioning Guidance Conference,

Minutes from Guidance Conference, Contractor Data, User Requirements, Contract, Provisioning Parts List (PPL), DLA data, CONOPS, Initial Provisioning Performance Specification (IPPS)

Program office, Acquistion Logistician, Contractor, OEM, Other DoD Services if joint, DLA, ALC, SSM, MAJCOM, vendors

Official minutes, any required contract modifications, PIO, Supply Support Request (SSR), AF Form 86 Cataloging Request, Refined cost estimate and budgeting

PBL, Program reviews, warranties, AF Form 86 Cataloging Request, NIMSR, AFMC Form 918


COMPLETE PROGRAM TRANSFER TEMPLATE AS REQUIRED FOR ALL PROGRAM EXECUTIVE OFFICER (PEO) REVIEWS Program Office/ALC, WS plan (spiral)

Ongoing (30 days - months)

Establish transfer policy at AFMC and AQ level

ENSURE ADEQUATE RESOURCES PLANNED FOR PROGRAM TRANSFER (ALC)

Sustainment / Acquisition Composite Model (SACOM), CMS

Agreed to Program Transfer Template

Program Office/ALC req'd

New work package for ALC

DP councils, Program Objective Memorandum (POM) cycle

HR/DP, FM , PM Center level CD's/CC's

Policy from AFMC on non transfer of slots


Expectation Management Agreement (EMA) Process

Supportability Plan Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP)

Program Office and target Org for Expectation Management Agreement (EMA)

Expectation Management Agreement (EMA)s

Single process initiative by targeted org

COMPLETE SUPPORTABILITY REPORTING TEMPLATE FOR ALL PROGRAM EXECUTIVE OFFICER (PEO) REVIEWS (SEMI-ANNUALLY)

Contract award, Program Executive Officer (PEO) review

Program Office/ALC, contract, Program Objective Memorandum (POM)

Program Office, ALC, MAJCOM

Sustainment chart for Program Executive Officer (PEO) review


Contract award, contractor deliverable

Integrated Master Plan / Integrated Master Schedule (IMP/IMS) in place

Contract schedule, plan itself

Program Office, ALC, MAJCOM

Updated or new Integrated Master Plan / Integrated Master Schedule (IMP/IMS)

Integrated Master Plan / Integrated Master Schedule (IMP/IMS) IT software in use

Standard Integrated Master Plan / Integrated Master Schedule (IMP/IMS) to modify

UPDATE SUPPORTABILITY REQUIREMENTS IN COST ANALYSIS REQUIREMENT DESCRIPTION (CARD), PROGRAM OFFICE ESTIMATE (POE), COMPONENT COST ANALYSIS (CCA), INDEPENDENT COST ESTIMATE (ICE), AFFORDABILITY ASSESSMENT

Cost Analysis Requirement Description (CARD), Program Office Estimate (POE), Component Cost Analysis (CCA), ICE

Program Office, ALC, FM, MAJCOM

Comprehensive Cost & Requirements System (CCaRS), other databases

Program Office, ALC, HQ AFMC

EVALUATE AND MAINTAIN CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS SUPPORTABILITY DATA (COMMERCIAL OFF THE SHELF (COTS) & CONTRACT DATA REQUIREMENTS LIST (CDRL)s)

D220, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), Interactive Electronic Technical Manuals (IETMS), Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS), Core Automated Maintenance System (CAMS), Joint Engineering Data Management Information Control System (JEDMICS), seer


Contract, Supportability Plan, Program Schedule





ENSURE CONTRACT FOR SUSTAINMENT (ORGANIC, COMMERCIAL & PARTNERSHIPS)



Program Office, ALCs Prime Contractor, MAJCOMS


CONDUCT SITE ACTIVATION TASK FORCE (SATAF) HHQ Beddown Plan, Operational Site reviews, Table of Allowance, Facilities Plan (Contractor), Status of Base Readiness, and P Plan

MAJCOM, Base Personnel, Contractors, Program Office, System Supportability Manager (SSM), Wing Cmdr, MAJCOM CC/CV

Site Activation Task Force (SATAF) Team Outbrief, Status of Base Readiness, Schedule, Action Items, Mitigation Plan, Training elements, parking lot, fences, supply sources

Site Activation Task Force (SATAF) Checklist, Integrated Master Plan / Integrated Master Schedule (IMP/IMS), Risk Assessment, Suspense Tracking System, Contractor Data and Data Systems, and DD 250

12 months planning; 6 weeks Site Activation Task Force (SATAF), all actions completed 3 months prior to FAA

MAJCOM, Base Personnel, Contractors, Program Office and System Supportability Manager (SSM) representatives

ESTABLISH SITE ACTIVATION TASK FORCE (SATAF) TEAM FOR EACH LOCATION

HHQ Beddown Plan, Operational Site reviews, Table of Allowance, Facilities Plan (Contractor), Status of Base Readiness, and P Plan




































CONDUCT SITE ACTIVATION TASK FORCE (SATAF) OUTBRIEF







Contract and Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s, Supportability Plan, AFMCMAN 23-1

Funding and Contract, Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s (ISSL, PPL), Site Activation Task Force (SATAF), Integrated Master Plan / Integrated Master Schedule (IMP/IMS), Contractor parts data Contract delivery order, DRs, Receiver utilization data

Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), Prime Contractor w/govt oversight, Program Office, ALC and MAJCOMs

Delivery Schedule, shipping instructions, item marking instructions, evaluation of contractor progress, adjusted requirements, input for Advanced Planning System (APS), spares, mitigation plan

Performance-Based Logistics, Public-Private Partnerships (PPP), UID Registry, PHS&T, Export license, SSIPT, Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS), Advanced Planning System (APS), DD250


Contract and Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s, Supportability Plan









Delivery Schedule, shipping instructions, item marking instructions, evaluation of contractor progress, adjusted requirements, input for APS, spares, mitigation plan









E2


K2


L2


M2


N2


O2


P2


10 OF 159

TASK DESCRIPTION

IT S

ys

tem

s

TR

IGG

ER

CO

NT

RO

LS

INP

UT

OU

TP

UT

ME

CH

AN

ISM

S

CY

CL

E T

IME

SD

D (

INT

EG

RA

TIO

N)

PL

AN

SU

PP

OR

T

DE

SIG

N S

UP

PO

RT

FIE

LD

SU

PP

OR

T

MA

INT

AIN

PR

OD

UC

TS

IMP

RO

VE

PR

OD

UC

TS

RE

TIR

E P

RO

DU

CT

S

OR

G/P

LA

YE

RS

SA

F,

HQ

, L

OG

RE

SO

UR

CE

S

CO

NS

UM

ED

IMP

RO

VE

ME

NT

O

PP

OR

TU

NIT

IES

CO

NC

EP

T

RE

FIN

EM

EN

T

TE

CH

NO

LO

GY

D

EV

EL

OP

ME

NT

SD

D

(D

EM

ON

ST

RA

TIO

N)

PR

OD

UC

TIO

N &

D

EP

LO

YM

EN

T

OP

ER

AT

ION

S &

S

UP

PO

RT

DE

TE

RM

INE

S

UP

PO

RT

R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

TS

DE

VE

LO

P &

AC

QU

IRE

S

UP

PO

RT

MA

NA

GE

C

AP

AB

ILIT

IES

MONITOR SPARES UTILIZATION Contract Award 12 Mos

Contract Award 12 Mos

RESPOND TO DEFICIENCY REPORTS (DR)s Contract Award 12 Mos

RECEIVE SPARES Contract Award 12 Mos

PHS&T data PHS&T data 1-15 days Manpower

X X

ACQUIRE INITIAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT N/A Contract Award

X X

EXECUTE CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS Contract Award

X X

MONITOR CONTRACTOR SUPPORT EQUIP PROGRESS Contract Award

X X

MONITOR CONTRACTOR DELIVERY Contract Award

X X

RECEIVE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (SE) Contract Award

X X

4.24.4.1

N/A

X X

4.24.4.2

D039

X X







ADDRESS DIMINISHED MANUFACTURERS SOURCES ISSUES



















ENSURE INFORMATION PROVIDED TO ALC TO COMPLETE AFMC PACKAGING FORM 158 and DD 1653 (FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATION (FAR) CLAUSES FOR TRANSPORTATION)



Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), AFMCI 24-201, AFMC Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), DoD Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), AF Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)


Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), AFMCI 24-201, AFMC Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), DoD Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), AF Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), AFMC form 158, DD form 1653, SIS D035T, Special Packaging Instruction Retrieval & Exchange System (SPIRES), Automated Contract Purchasing System (ACPS)

Funding, Contract and Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s, Supportability Plan,

CDRL (Support Equipment Requirements Document), Funding & Contract, Integrated Master Plan / Integrated Master Schedule (IMP/IMS), Site Activation Task Force (SATAF), Contract Delivery Order, Receiver utilization data, Contractor SE/Test Data, DRs

Contractor w/govt oversight , Program office, ALC and MAJCOMs, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), Equipment & IM specialist

Delivery Schedule, shipping instructions Support Equipment Requirements Document, (GFE/CFE) List of hand tools, support equipment, evaluation of contractor performance, adjusted requirements, input for forecast (Advanced Planning System (APS)) mitigation plan

Contract, UID/RFID, DMS, DRs, PHS&T, Export license, MIL STD 1519, Performance-Based Logistics, Public-Private Partnerships (PPP), SEIPT, IMPAC, Mil hdbk 300, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) systems, Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS), Expeditionary Combat Support System (ECSS), DD250

Lead-time from delivery date 12-18 mos























Funding, Contract and Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s, Supportability Plan







DEVELOP LIST FOR SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (SE) (PM) WEAPON SYSTEM SPECIFIC

Support Equipment Requirements Document

Funding, Contract and Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s, Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP), TO





SEND APPROVED SUPPORT EQUIPMENT REQUIREMENTS DOCUMENT (SERD) TO ASC WR-ALC,/585 CBSS







E2


K2


L2


M2


N2


O2


P2


11 OF 159

TASK DESCRIPTION

IT S

ys

tem

s

TR

IGG

ER

CO

NT

RO

LS

INP

UT

OU

TP

UT

ME

CH

AN

ISM

S

CY

CL

E T

IME

SD

D (

INT

EG

RA

TIO

N)

PL

AN

SU

PP

OR

T

DE

SIG

N S

UP

PO

RT

FIE

LD

SU

PP

OR

T

MA

INT

AIN

PR

OD

UC

TS

IMP

RO

VE

PR

OD

UC

TS

RE

TIR

E P

RO

DU

CT

S

OR

G/P

LA

YE

RS

SA

F,

HQ

, L

OG

RE

SO

UR

CE

S

CO

NS

UM

ED

IMP

RO

VE

ME

NT

O

PP

OR

TU

NIT

IES

CO

NC

EP

T

RE

FIN

EM

EN

T

TE

CH

NO

LO

GY

D

EV

EL

OP

ME

NT

SD

D

(D

EM

ON

ST

RA

TIO

N)

PR

OD

UC

TIO

N &

D

EP

LO

YM

EN

T

OP

ER

AT

ION

S &

S

UP

PO

RT

DE

TE

RM

INE

S

UP

PO

RT

R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

TS

DE

VE

LO

P &

AC

QU

IRE

S

UP

PO

RT

MA

NA

GE

C

AP

AB

ILIT

IES

4.24.4.3 X X

4.24.4.4 X X

MONITOR SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (SE) UTILIZATION Contract Award

Contract Award

RESPOND TO DEFICIENCY REPORTS (DR)s Contract Award

ACQUIRE INITIAL TRAINING/TRAINING EQUIPMENT N/A Contract Award Funding and Contract Purchase Order Forms

X X

EXECUTE CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS Contract Award Funding and Contract Purchase Order Forms

Contract Award Funding and Contract Purchase Order Forms

MONITOR CONTRACTOR DELIVERY Contract Award Funding and Contract Purchase Order Forms

RECEIVE TRAINING MATERIAL / EQUIPMENT Contract Award Funding and Contract Purchase Order Forms

ACQUIRE FORMAL TECHNICAL ORDERS Contract Award Funding and Contract Purchase Order Forms

X X

Contract Award Funding and Contract Purchase Order Forms

RECEIVE TECHNICAL ORDERS / MANUALS Contract Award Funding and Contract Purchase Order Forms

VERIFY TECHNICAL ORDERS Contract Award Funding and Contract Purchase Order Forms

RESPOND TO DEFICIENCIES Contract Award Funding and Contract Purchase Order Forms

DELIVER INITIAL SUPPLY SUPPORT DD250/J018 Contract Award Purchase Order Spares Delivered Rail, Trucks, Planes

X X

DELIVER INITIAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (SE) DD250/J018 Contract Award Purchase Order Rail, Trucks, Planes

X X

DELIVER INITIAL TRAINING/TRAINING EQUIPMENT DD250/J018 Contract Award Purchase Order Rail, Trucks, Planes

X X

DELIVER FORMAL TECHNICAL ORDERS Contract Award Purchase Order Rail, Trucks, Planes

X X

FIRST ASSET AVAILABLE (FAA) AND SUPPORTABLE DD250/J018 X XN/A 50-50, Clinger Cohen Manpower

X X

N/A Core, 50/50, Manpower, Funding

X X

X XCMS AFI 65-601 Manpower

X X

N/A X X

X X

X X

X X

X X

X X

X X

N/AX X

INCLUDE SUPPORTABILITY IN THE SOURCE SELECTION PLAN N/A Acq Plan Acq StrategyX X

N/AX X

Source Selection Plan

X X

ASC DEVELOP ALLOWANCE SOURCE CODE LIST

Air Force Equipment Management System (AFEMS)







LOAD INTO AIR FORCE EQUIPMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (AFEMS) AND PUBLISH ALLOWANCE STANDARD















ADDRESS DIMINISHED MANUFACTURERS SOURCE ISSUES
















Prime Contractor, Program Office, ALC and MAJCOMs

Lead-time from delivery date

Program Office/PK/FM/PM/Logistics





MONITOR CONTRACTOR TRAINING MATERIAL / EQUIPMENT PROGRESS













Interactive Electronic Technical Manuals (IETMS)





MONITOR CONTRACTOR TECHNICAL ORDERS / MANUALS PROGRESS



















Incremental deliveries based on schedule

Prime Contractor, MAJCOMs, ALCs, Program Offices



Support Equipment Delivered





Training Materials and Equipment Delivered



DD250/J018, Interactive Electronic Technical Manuals (IETMS)



Tech Data/Orders Delivered



CONTINUE DEPOT MAINTENANCE ACTIVATION WORKING GROUP (DMAWG)

Schedule set during initial development 2.20

Depot strategy, Level of Repair determinations, Source of Repair Assignment Process (SORAP)

System Program Director (SPD) , using command, System Supportability Manager (SSM), AFMC A4,

Required depot maintenance capability

System Development & Demonstration (SDD) through O&S

Combine with other working groups,

PLAN FOR DEPOT STAND-UP IMP/IMS, DSOR Process,

Depot strategy, Level of Repair determinations, DSOR Process, Funding, Equipment, Material, Tech Data, Manpower

System Program Director (SPD) , using command, System Supportability Manager (SSM), AFMC/A4, DMAWG, Contractor

Depot maintenance capability plan

Personnel, Technical Data

CONTINUE PERIODIC LOGISTICS PLANNING MEETINGSCONTINUED PROGRAM OBJECTIVE MEMORANDUM (POM)

INPUTS FOR SUPPORTABILITY REQUIREMENTSFYDP - PBD Cycle timing cont from 2.36, 3.42

Phased requirements by dollar and year

FM, System Program Director (SPD) , Log Manager

R-Docs, P-Doc and Financial Plan

2 year cycle for budget preparation

Eliminate Colors of money, more guarantee of resources

UPDATE SUPPORTABILITY IN THE ACQUISITION PROGRAM BASELINE (APB)

On-going from 2.35, 3.46

PARTICIPATE IN OPERATIONAL TEST READINESS REVIEW (OTRR) MS C - Low Rate Initial Production (LRIP)

Test & Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP)

Production Readiness Review (PRR) Initial Baseline Review (IBR)

ENSURE SUPPORT FOR INITIAL OPERATIONAL TEST & EVALUATION (IOT&E) AND FULL UP LIVE FIRE TEST & EVALUATION (LFT&E)

Operational Test Readiness Review (OTRR)

PARTICIPATE IN INITIAL OPERATIONAL TEST & EVALUATION (IOT&E)

Low Rate Initial Production (LRIP)

Full Rate Production (FRP)-Decision Review

ANALYZE DATA FROM INITIAL OPERATIONAL TEST & EVALUATION (IOT&E) / VALIDATE SUPPORTABILITY

Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS), Core Automated Maintenance System (CAMS)

Initial Operational Test & Evaluation (IOT&E)

Test results, Acquisition Program Baseline (APB), Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP)

Performance-Based Logistics

PARTICIPATE IN PHYSICAL CONFIGURATION AUDIT (PCA) Joint Engineering Data Management Information Control System (JEDMICS)

Performance-Based Logistics implementation

Test results, Acquisition Program Baseline (APB), Correction of Deficiencies (COD) , product support plan

Production baseline, Test & Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP), PESHE, Systems Engineering Plan (SEP)

UPDATE PRODUCT SUPPORT STRATEGY IN THE LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT PLAN (LCMP)

Logistics Planning and Requirements System (LOGPARS) Army System

On-going from 2.05, 2.37, 3.18, 3.47

System Program Director (SPD) , Log Manager

updated Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP)


On-going from 2.06, 2.22, 2.38, 3.12, 3.33, 4.16

Draft Expectation Management Agreement (EMA)

Expectation Management Agreement (EMA)



On-going from 2.08, 2.40, 4.02



Acq Strategy with Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP)


E2


K2


L2


M2


N2


O2


P2


12 OF 159

TASK DESCRIPTION

IT S

ys

tem

s

TR

IGG

ER

CO

NT

RO

LS

INP

UT

OU

TP

UT

ME

CH

AN

ISM

S

CY

CL

E T

IME

SD

D (

INT

EG

RA

TIO

N)

PL

AN

SU

PP

OR

T

DE

SIG

N S

UP

PO

RT

FIE

LD

SU

PP

OR

T

MA

INT

AIN

PR

OD

UC

TS

IMP

RO

VE

PR

OD

UC

TS

RE

TIR

E P

RO

DU

CT

S

OR

G/P

LA

YE

RS

SA

F,

HQ

, L

OG

RE

SO

UR

CE

S

CO

NS

UM

ED

IMP

RO

VE

ME

NT

O

PP

OR

TU

NIT

IES

CO

NC

EP

T

RE

FIN

EM

EN

T

TE

CH

NO

LO

GY

D

EV

EL

OP

ME

NT

SD

D

(D

EM

ON

ST

RA

TIO

N)

PR

OD

UC

TIO

N &

D

EP

LO

YM

EN

T

OP

ER

AT

ION

S &

S

UP

PO

RT

DE

TE

RM

INE

S

UP

PO

RT

R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

TS

DE

VE

LO

P &

AC

QU

IRE

S

UP

PO

RT

MA

NA

GE

C

AP

AB

ILIT

IES

Source selection plan

X X

N/A Test ReportsX X

N/A Test ReportsX X

PARTICIPATE IN RISK MANAGEMENT N/A Risk Assessment Risk Management Plan X X

N/A

X X

ENSURE DEPOT REPAIR CAPABILITY INITIATED N/A Core, 50/50, Funding Depot Capacity

X X

N/A Production ContractX X

FULL RATE PRODUCTION (FRP) DECISION REVIEW X XUPDATE MIGRATION PLAN (CONTINUOUS) N/A Contract Award AFI's and AFMCI's Migration Plan signed Data system 1-6 months

X X

PARTICIPATE IN SOURCE SELECTION (LOGISTICIAN) Acquisition Led Process

X X

AWARD PRODUCTION CONTRACT Signed contract Award is one day

X X


X X


X X


X X


X

ACCOMPLISH THE PROVISIONING CONFERENCE D220, D155, D169 AFMCI 23-101 Updated policy and guidance,

X X

N/A AFMC Transition Guide 1-2 years

X X

N/A 30 days

X X

N/A Template <30 days Prod/Log Center, MAJCOM

X X

Contract Award AFI 63-101 3-6 months

X X

N/A Contract Award Program Reviews Ongoing

X X


X X

Contract Award Contract Contract 6 months

X X

ACQUIRE FULL SUPPLY SUPPORT CAPABILITY Contract >12 months

X X


Unique Identification (UID) Registry

LSMP, Source of Repair Assignment Process (SORAP),

Technical Order Management Agency (TOMA), Log Manager, System Program Director (SPD)

Request for Proposal (RFP), Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s,




UPDATE SUPPORTABILITY INPUTS TO THE TEST & EVALUATION MASTER PLAN (TEMP)

On-going from 3.20, 4.05

Test & Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP)

UPDATE SUPPORTABILITY INPUTS TO THE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING PLAN (SEP)

On-going from 2.03, 2.32, 3.21, 4.06


On-going from 2.03, 2.32, 3.21, 4.06


On going from 2.12, 2.26, 3.06, 3.14, 4.08, 4.18

Integrated Master Plan (IMP)

IMP/IMS, DSOR Process, MRRB

Depot maintenance capability plan, DSOR Process, Funding, Equipment, Material, Tech Data, Manpower, Facilities

System Program Director (SPD) , using command, System Supportability Manager (SSM), AFMC/A4, DMAWG, Contractor

Initial Depot Repair Capability

Personnel, Technical Data, Funding

PREPARE DOCUMENTATION FOR FULL RATE PRODUCTION (FRP) DECISION REVIEW Beyond Low Rate Production

Operational Test Readiness Review (OTRR)

PARTICIPATE IN FOREIGN MILITARY SALES (FMS) ACTIVITIES (if applicable)


Program Office/ALC/Prod Center, AFMC, Aerospace Maintenance and Regeneration Group (AMARG), MAJCOM


EZ Source, Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), Navy System



Source Selection Plan (if required at this point) Information concerning Preferred System Concept from Alternative of Action (AOA) Study, Approved Course of Action (COA) approach




Source Selection Authority (SSA)/Program Executive Officer (PEO) approval

Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) clause PK regulation

Request for Proposal (RFP), responses, discussions

Program Office/ALC/Prod Center


Contracting officer, PM team, CFO


INCLUDE SUPPORTABILITY REQUIREMENTS IN DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY (DCMA) MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT (MOA)






Details of contract, Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) clauses, AFI's, Contractor, security reqmts


Accepted contract deliverables, briefing charts, studies, reports, System Metric & Reporting Tool (SMART) Asset Review (MART, Management Asset Review (MAR), Defense Acquisition Executive (DAE), Program Executive Officer (PEO) review



ACCOMPLISH SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (SE) GUIDANCE CONFERENCEPROVIDE LOGISTICS SUPPORT DURING THE DEFICIENCY REPORTING (DR) PROCESSG021, Joint Deficiency

Reporting System (JDRS)












Acquisition Strategy Panel, Contract, Provisioning Guidance Conference,

Minutes from Guidance Conference, Contractor Data, User Requirements, Contract, Provisioning Parts List (PPL), DLA data, CONOPS, Initial Provisioning Performance Specification (IPPS)

Program office, Acquistion Logistician, Contractor, OEM, Other DoD Services if joint, DLA, ALC, SSM, MAJCOM, vendors

Official minutes, any required contract modifications, PIO, Supply Support Request (SSR), AF Form 86 Cataloging Request, Refined cost estimate and budgeting

PBL, Program reviews, warranties, AF Form 86 Cataloging Request, NIMSR, AFMC Form 918


DEVELOP A TRANSITION SUPPORT PLAN (part of program transfer process)

Agreed transition date between PM and System Supportability Manager (SSM)

ILA Handbook, AFMC Transition Guide, Contract, IMS/IMP, Expectation Management Agreement (EMA)s and Performance Based Agreements

Program Office, System Supportability Manager (SSM) office, AFMC A1, Centers XPs, Program Executive Officer (PEO)

Signed Transition Plan, Program Executive Officer (PEO) portfolio review charts

Program Executive Officer (PEO) charts, Transition Plan


COMPLETE PROGRAM TRANSFER TEMPLATE AS REQUIRED FOR ALL PROGRAM EXECUTIVE OFFICER (PEO) REVIEWS


AFMC Transition Guide, Standard Template charts for Program Executive Officer (PEO) review



Program Executive Officer (PEO) portfolio review charts

Program Executive Officer (PEO) charts, Transition Plan


COMPLETE SUPPORTABILITY REPORTING TEMPLATE FOR ALL PROGRAM EXECUTIVE OFFICER (PEO) REVIEWS







D220, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), Interactive Electronic Technical Manuals (IETMS), Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS), Core Automated Maintenance System (CAMS), Joint Engineering Data Management Information Control System (JEDMICS), seer

Program Baseline, Acquisition Program Baseline (APB)s, Key Performance Parameters (KPP)s, Key System Attributes (KSA)s, Contract

Program Office, System Supportability Manager (SSM) office, MAJCOM


Expectation Management Agreement (EMA) Process and Template



Integrated Master Plan / Integrated Master Schedule (IMP/IMS) Guide

Contract, Weapon System Schedule, Program Executive Officer (PEO) Schedule, Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP), PM plan, TEMP, Systems Engineering Plan, Site Activation Task Force (SATAF) Plan, UID Plan

Program Office, System Supportability Manager (SSM) and Depot Supportability Manager (DSM) offices

Integrated Master Plan / Integrated Master Schedule (IMP/IMS)

CONTINUE TO EVALUATE CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS SUPPORTABILITY DATA (INCLUDING COMMERCIAL OFF THE SHELF (COTS) & CONTRACT DATA REQUIREMENTS LIST (CDRLs) (LEVEL OF REPAIR ANALYSIS (LORA), MAINTENANCE TASK ANALYSIS (MTA), RELIABILITY CENTERED MAINTENANCE (RCM), ENGINEERING DATA, MAINTENANCE, ETC)

D220, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), Interactive Electronic Technical Manuals (IETMS), Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS), Core Automated Maintenance System (CAMS), Joint Engineering Data Management Information Control System (JEDMICS)




Updated Supportability Plan



ENSURE CONTRACT FOR SUSTAINMENT (ORGANIC, COMMERCIAL & PARTNERSHIPS)



Program Office, ALCs Prime Contractor, MAJCOMS

Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and applicable public laws including Title 10


D220, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), Interactive Electronic Technical Manuals (IETMS), Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS), Core Automated Maintenance System (CAMS), Joint Engineering Data Management Information Control System (JEDMICS), Support Equipment Requirements Document (SERD), Advanced Planning System (APS), Expeditionary Combat Support System (ECSS), UID Register

Depot Activation and Base Activation

Funding , Contract, Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s, IMPs/IMS, Site Activation Task Force (SATAF), Contract Delivery Order, Contract Parts Data, Field Data, Receiver Utilization Data, Government Industry Data Exchange Program (GIDEP), Deficiency Reports, Diminishing Manufacturing Sources (DMS) Plan

Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), MAJCOM, ALC, Depot Maintenance Activation Working Group (DMAWG), Contractor, Contracting Officer, Logisticians, Engineers, Test Organizations, Defense Contracts Management Agency (DCMA)

Delivery Schedule, Shipping Instructions, Item Marking List, Evaluation of Contractor progress, Spares, Adjusted Requirements, Input for Spares Forecast (Advanced Planning System (APS)) (NOTE: old D200 system), Mitigation plan

DD250, D200, Transportation Systems, Base Supply Systems, Cataloging, Performance-Based Logistics, Public-Private Partnerships (PPP), UID Registry, PHS&T, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) systems, Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS) Database, Export License, Expeditionary Combat Support System (ECSS), Advanced Planning System (APS)

E2


K2


L2


M2


N2


O2


P2


13 OF 159

TASK DESCRIPTION

IT S

ys

tem

s

TR

IGG

ER

CO

NT

RO

LS

INP

UT

OU

TP

UT

ME

CH

AN

ISM

S

CY

CL

E T

IME

SD

D (

INT

EG

RA

TIO

N)

PL

AN

SU

PP

OR

T

DE

SIG

N S

UP

PO

RT

FIE

LD

SU

PP

OR

T

MA

INT

AIN

PR

OD

UC

TS

IMP

RO

VE

PR

OD

UC

TS

RE

TIR

E P

RO

DU

CT

S

OR

G/P

LA

YE

RS

SA

F,

HQ

, L

OG

RE

SO

UR

CE

S

CO

NS

UM

ED

IMP

RO

VE

ME

NT

O

PP

OR

TU

NIT

IES

CO

NC

EP

T

RE

FIN

EM

EN

T

TE

CH

NO

LO

GY

D

EV

EL

OP

ME

NT

SD

D

(D

EM

ON

ST

RA

TIO

N)

PR

OD

UC

TIO

N &

D

EP

LO

YM

EN

T

OP

ER

AT

ION

S &

S

UP

PO

RT

DE

TE

RM

INE

S

UP

PO

RT

R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

TS

DE

VE

LO

P &

AC

QU

IRE

S

UP

PO

RT

MA

NA

GE

C

AP

AB

ILIT

IES

EXECUTE CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS N/A Contract >12 months

MONITOR CONTRACTOR SPARES PROGRESS N/A Contract >12 months

MONITOR CONTRACTOR DELIVERY N/A Contract >12 months

RECEIVE SPARES DD250/J018 Contract >12 months

MONITOR SPARES UTILIZATION DD250/J018 Contract >12 months

DD250/J018 Contract >12 months

RESPOND TO DEFICIENCY REPORTS (DR)s Contract >12 months

ACQUIRE FULL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (SE) CAPABILITY N/A Contract 24-48 mos

X X

EXECUTE CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS N/A Contract 24-48 mos

X X

CMS Contract 24-48 mos

X X


























ADDRESS DIMINISHING MANUFACTURER SOURCE (DMS) ISSUES






DD250/J018, Interactive Electronic Technical Manuals (IETMS)















Delivery Schedule, shipping instructions Support Equipment Requirements Document, (GFE/CFE) List of hand tools, support equipment, evaluation of contractor performance, adjusted requirements, input for forecast (APS) mitigation plan



MONITOR CONTRACTOR SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (SE) PROGRESS







E2


K2


L2


M2


N2


O2


P2


14 OF 159

TASK DESCRIPTION

IT S

ys

tem

s

TR

IGG

ER

CO

NT

RO

LS

INP

UT

OU

TP

UT

ME

CH

AN

ISM

S

CY

CL

E T

IME

SD

D (

INT

EG

RA

TIO

N)

PL

AN

SU

PP

OR

T

DE

SIG

N S

UP

PO

RT

FIE

LD

SU

PP

OR

T

MA

INT

AIN

PR

OD

UC

TS

IMP

RO

VE

PR

OD

UC

TS

RE

TIR

E P

RO

DU

CT

S

OR

G/P

LA

YE

RS

SA

F,

HQ

, L

OG

RE

SO

UR

CE

S

CO

NS

UM

ED

IMP

RO

VE

ME

NT

O

PP

OR

TU

NIT

IES

CO

NC

EP

T

RE

FIN

EM

EN

T

TE

CH

NO

LO

GY

D

EV

EL

OP

ME

NT

SD

D

(D

EM

ON

ST

RA

TIO

N)

PR

OD

UC

TIO

N &

D

EP

LO

YM

EN

T

OP

ER

AT

ION

S &

S

UP

PO

RT

DE

TE

RM

INE

S

UP

PO

RT

R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

TS

DE

VE

LO

P &

AC

QU

IRE

S

UP

PO

RT

MA

NA

GE

C

AP

AB

ILIT

IES

MONITOR CONTRACTOR DELIVERY Contract 24-48 mos

X X

RECEIVE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (SE) Contract 24-48 mos

X X

4.55.4.1

1-2 days

X X

4.55.4.2

1-2 days

X X

4.55.4.3

1-2 days

X X

4.55.4.4

1-2 days

X X

4.55.4.5

1-2 days

X X

MONITOR SUPPORT EQUIPMENT UTILIZATION Contract 24-48 mos

X X

N/A Contract 24-48 mos

X X

RESPOND TO DEFICIENCY REPORTS (DR)s N/A Contract 24-48 mos

X X

ACQUIRE FULL TRAINING/TRAINING EQUIPMENT CAPABILITY N/A Contract

X X

EXECUTE CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS N/A Contract

Contract

MONITOR CONTRACTOR DELIVERY N/A Contract





Delivery Schedule, shipping instructions Support Equipment Requirements Document, (GFE/CFE) List of hand tools, support equipment, evaluation of contractor performance, adjusted requirements, input for forecast (APS) mitigation plan









BASE ORDERS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (SE) FROM ASC LIST (MAJCOM)

Standard Base Supply System (SBSS), Air Force Equipment Management System (AFEMS)

Site Activation Task Force (SATAF), base activation

Funding, Allowance Source Code (ASC)

Funding, Site Activation Task Force (SATAF)


Projected receiving dates, requisition

Base supply, transportation, maintainers,

LOAD ORGANIZATION CODE IN AIR FORCE EQUIPMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (AFEMS)






Air Force Equipment Management System (AFEMS) updated, Org code loaded


BUILD AUTHORIZATION PACKAGES SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (SE) REQUIREMENTS






Air Force Equipment Management System (AFEMS) updated


BUILD SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (SE) READINESS PLAN (PHASING SCHEDULE)






Air Force Equipment Management System (AFEMS) updated


CUSTOMER PLACES EQUIPMENT ON ORDER THROUGH EQUIPMENT MANAGEMENT / LOGISTICS READINESS SQUADRON (LRS)






Projected receiving dates, requisition









ADDRESS DIMINISHING MANUFACTURER SOURCES (DMS) ISSUES















Contractor w/govt oversight, Contracting Officer, ALC, Depot Maintenance Activation Working Group (DMAWG), MAJCOM, AETC,

Delivery Schedule Shipping Instructions, Item Marking Instructions, Evaluation of Contractor Progress, Deliver Training Material/Equipment

Performance-Based Logistics, Public-Private Partnerships (PPP), UID Registry, PHS&T, Training Planning Team , DD250

12 mos for training material, *note DEPOT Training Equipment dependent on delivery of support equipment and Weapons System









MONITOR CONTRACTOR TRAINING MATERIAL/ EQUIPMENT PROGRESS















E2


K2


L2


M2


N2


O2


P2


15 OF 159

TASK DESCRIPTION

IT S

ys

tem

s

TR

IGG

ER

CO

NT

RO

LS

INP

UT

OU

TP

UT

ME

CH

AN

ISM

S

CY

CL

E T

IME

SD

D (

INT

EG

RA

TIO

N)

PL

AN

SU

PP

OR

T

DE

SIG

N S

UP

PO

RT

FIE

LD

SU

PP

OR

T

MA

INT

AIN

PR

OD

UC

TS

IMP

RO

VE

PR

OD

UC

TS

RE

TIR

E P

RO

DU

CT

S

OR

G/P

LA

YE

RS

SA

F,

HQ

, L

OG

RE

SO

UR

CE

S

CO

NS

UM

ED

IMP

RO

VE

ME

NT

O

PP

OR

TU

NIT

IES

CO

NC

EP

T

RE

FIN

EM

EN

T

TE

CH

NO

LO

GY

D

EV

EL

OP

ME

NT

SD

D

(D

EM

ON

ST

RA

TIO

N)

PR

OD

UC

TIO

N &

D

EP

LO

YM

EN

T

OP

ER

AT

ION

S &

S

UP

PO

RT

DE

TE

RM

INE

S

UP

PO

RT

R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

TS

DE

VE

LO

P &

AC

QU

IRE

S

UP

PO

RT

MA

NA

GE

C

AP

AB

ILIT

IES

RECEIVE TRAINING MATERIAL/ EQUIPMENT Contract

ACQUIRE UPDATED TECHNICAL DATA T.O. 00-5-1

X X

EXECUTE CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS T.O. 00-5-1

CMS T.O. 00-5-1

MONITOR CONTRACTOR DELIVERY N/A T.O.. 00-5-1

RECEIVE TECHNICAL ORDERS / MANUALS N/A T.O. 00-5-1

RESPOND TO DEFICIENCIES N/A T.O. 00-5-1

DELIVER FULL SUPPLY SUPPORT CAPABILITY N/A Contract Award 1-2 years

X X

DELIVER FULL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (SE) CAPABILITY N/A Contract

X X

Strategic direction On going ALC, AFMC/A4, MAJCOM

X X

DELIVER FULL TRAINING/TRAINING EQUIPMENT CAPABILITY N/A Contract

X X

T.O. 00-5-1

X X


X X

DD250/J018 50-50, Clinger Cohen Public Law Title 10

X X

X X

Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), G009, System Metric & Reporting Tool (SMART)-AQ








Sustainment / Acquisiiton Composite Model (SACOM), CMS, Logistics Composite Model (LCOM)

Contract award, Data Deficiency

Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s (TM-8601) Funding, Contract, Contract delivery order, Integrated Master Plan / Integrated Master Schedule (IMP/IMS), AFTO 22, DRs, Product Baseline, Engineering Change Proposal, Engineering Change Notices, Data deficiency, informal communication

Contractor w/govt oversight, Contracting Officer, ALC, Technical Order Management Agency (TOMA), Equipment Specialists, Engineers, MAJCOMs, Test

Delivery Schedule, Distribution Instructions, Evaluation of Contractor Progress, Technical Orders / Manuals, Updated Product Baseline, Resolution, Updated Technical Orders, Time Compliance Technical Order (TCTO)s

Performance-Based Logistics, Publishing & distribution, TOIPT, Joint Computer Aided Acquisition and Logistics Support (JCALS), DD250

60 days prior to base/depot activation


Senior Officer Communication and Coordination Electronic Resource (SOCCER)








MONITOR CONTRACTOR (SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (SE), DEPOT, REMAINING FIELD) TECHNICAL ORDERS / MANUALS PROGRESS








































24-48 mos, ongoing for multiple base activations


COMMODITY COUNCIL MANAGES SUSTAINMENT OF SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (SE)


Requirement for the item Policy and regulations, commodity council

Advanced Planning System (APS), D035, D200C

ALC, AFMC/A4, MAJCOM

Commodity council business rules








DELIVER UPDATED TECHNICAL ORDERS IF REQUIRED BY THE TECHNICAL MANUAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS (TMCR) DOCUMENT TM-86-01

D200, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA)/Basic Sustainment Material (BSM)








CONTINUE CONDUCT SITE ACTIVATION TASK FORCE (SATAF) AS REQUIRED

Pre Award Information Exchange System (PIXS) ConWrite FEDBIZOPS, CBIS







CONTINUE DEPOT MAINTENANCE ACTIVATION WORKING GROUP (DMAWG)

Schedule set during initial development 2.20

Depot strategy, Level of Repair determinations, Source of Repair Assignment Process (SORAP)

System Program Director (SPD) , using command, SSM, AFMC A4,

Required depot maintenance capability

continue through depot stand up

System Program Director (SPD) , using command, System Supportability Manager (SSM), AFMC A4,

CONTINUE PERIODIC LOGISTICS PLANNING MEETINGS

E2


K2


L2


M2


N2


O2


P2


16 OF 159

TASK DESCRIPTION

IT S

ys

tem

s

TR

IGG

ER

CO

NT

RO

LS

INP

UT

OU

TP

UT

ME

CH

AN

ISM

S

CY

CL

E T

IME

SD

D (

INT

EG

RA

TIO

N)

PL

AN

SU

PP

OR

T

DE

SIG

N S

UP

PO

RT

FIE

LD

SU

PP

OR

T

MA

INT

AIN

PR

OD

UC

TS

IMP

RO

VE

PR

OD

UC

TS

RE

TIR

E P

RO

DU

CT

S

OR

G/P

LA

YE

RS

SA

F,

HQ

, L

OG

RE

SO

UR

CE

S

CO

NS

UM

ED

IMP

RO

VE

ME

NT

O

PP

OR

TU

NIT

IES

CO

NC

EP

T

RE

FIN

EM

EN

T

TE

CH

NO

LO

GY

D

EV

EL

OP

ME

NT

SD

D

(D

EM

ON

ST

RA

TIO

N)

PR

OD

UC

TIO

N &

D

EP

LO

YM

EN

T

OP

ER

AT

ION

S &

S

UP

PO

RT

DE

TE

RM

INE

S

UP

PO

RT

R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

TS

DE

VE

LO

P &

AC

QU

IRE

S

UP

PO

RT

MA

NA

GE

C

AP

AB

ILIT

IES

FM regulations Prod/Log Centers 60 days

X X

Fielded System Reports, briefings 90 days

X X

INITIAL OPERATIONAL CAPABILITY (IOC) N/A X30-60 days

X X

RESOLVE SUPPORTABILITY ISSUES 30-90 days

X X

N/A Contract Award AFI 10-503

X X

Transition Support Plan

X X


X X

FULL OPERATIONAL CAPABILITY (FOC)

X

N/A Transfer decision

X X

MANAGE BUSINESS ACTIVITIES Ongoing Data systems Ongoing

X X X

Fielded SystemX X


X X


X X

MANAGE RESOURCES N/A Ongoing Data systems Ongoing

X X

N/A Ongoing Data systems Ongoing

X X

PARTICIPATE IN RISK MANAGEMENT N/A AFI 63-101, DoD 5000 Acquisition Led Process

X X

PERFORM STRATEGIC PROGRAM PLANNING N/A Ongoing Ongoing

X X

CONDUCT SUSTAINMENT PROGRAM REVIEWS (SEMI-ANNUAL) N/A Template <30 days Prod/Log Center, MAJCOM

X X

N/A Milestone A decision HQ process Prod/Log centers, HQ AFMC

X X

REVIEW AND UPDATE PROGRAM OBJECTIVE MEMORANDUM (POM) AND BUDGET INPUTS FOR SUPPORTABILITY REQUIREMENTS

DO35, DO43, Standard Base Supply System (SBSS), D200, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), Government and Industry Data Exchange Program (GIDEP), DR SYS/GO21

Program Objective Memorandum (POM) Data Call


Program Objective Memorandum (POM)

Future budget, reports, meetings, presentations

Prod/Log Centers, Contractor w/govt oversight

ANALYZE DATA FROM FOLLOW ON OPERATIONAL TEST & EVALUATION (FOT&E) / FDE ASSESS SUPPORTABILITY

D200, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA)/Basic Sustainment Material (BSM), DO35G, Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS), Core Automated Maintenance System (CAMS)

Capability Production Document (CPD), Regulations, Test & Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP), Follow-on Operational Test & Evaluation (IOT&E) Test Plan

DT&E, Initial Operational Test & Evaluation (IOT&E), Follow-on Operational Test & Evaluation (IOT&E) Test results, DR)s, Contractor data

Program office, MAJCOM, Base personnel, AFRL, Contractor w/govt oversight

Updated Test & Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP), Categorized DRs, Analyzed test data, Evaluation review results

Program office, MAJCOM, Base personnel, AFRL, Contractor w/govt oversight

ENSURE THE INITIAL OPERATIONAL CAPABILITY (IOC) SUPPORTABILITY ASSESSMENTS ARE COMPLETED

EXPRESS/GO73, PDMSS, Standard Base Supply System (SBSS), DR/GO21, DO35T/DSS, GO19C, D200

Expectation Management Agreement (EMA) and negotiated date with MAJCOM; Contractual Deliveries

Technical Data, Technical Orders, Manpower and Personnel, Status of Resources and Training System (SORTS), Old Name: Blue Book, New Name: PD

Supportability Assessments, Initial Operational Test & Evaluation (IOT&E), Follow-on Operational Test & Evaluation (IOT&E), Air Force Operational Test and Evaluation Center (AFOTEC), test results, schedule, beddown plan, Logistics Support Plan, Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP)

Program Office, MAJCOM, Field Personnel, Air Force Operational Test and Evaluation Center (AFOTEC), AETC

MAJCOM declares IOC, Air Force Operational Test and Evaluation Center (AFOTEC) report, Operational capability

Dollars and manpower to perform operational functions, supply chain, transportation, maintenance, infrastructure

Program Office, MAJCOM, Field Personnel, Air Force Operational Test and Evaluation Center (AFOTEC), AETC

G009, Wide-Area Work Flow (WAWF), GO21, Government and Industry Data Exchange Program (GIDEP), DD250/JO18, D200, Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS)

Supportability Assessment report and MAJCOM generated issues, AFTO22, Discrepancy Reports (DRs)

DR process, 00-54, TO-00-15-1

DRs, funding, engineering support, maintenance information systems Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS)


Closed DRs, Engineering Change Proposal (ECP)s, response to the supportability report

Time Compliance Technical Order (TCTO)s, updated technical data, Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP), sustaining engineering


CONTINUE CONDUCTING SITE ACTIVATION TASK FORCE (SATAF)S







ASSESS SUITABILITY TO TRANSFER SYSTEM PROGRAM MANAGER (SPM) RESPONSIBILITY UTILIZING TRANSITION SUPPORT PLAN

Pre Award Information Exchange System (PIXS), ConWrite, FEDBIZOPS


AFMC Transition Guide, Standard Template charts for Program Executive Officer (PEO) review





D220, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), Interactive Electronic Technical Manuals (IETMS), Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS), Core Automated Maintenance System (CAMS), Joint Engineering Data Management Information Control System (JEDMICS), Support Equipment Requirements Document (SERD)






Interactive Electronic Technical Manuals (IETMS), Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS), Core Automated Maintenance System (CAMS)

TRANSFER SYSTEM PROGRAM MANAGER (SPM) RESPONSIBILITY TO ALC

AFMC Transition Guide, Completed Transfer Template

Program Executive Officer (PEO) Review Template, Program Data


Transfer to System Program Manager (SPM)

AFMC Transition Guide, Completed Transfer Template


Core Automated Maintenance System (CAMS), Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS), Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), D220

Budget, cost, schedule, performance (Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS)), risk and change management, Performance Evaluation, Baseline establishment / management, EVMs monitoring, Source Agreement management

MAJCOM Budget, Milestone C documents, Definitive Agreement

Program Office, System Supportability Manager (SSM), AFMC, ALCs, Product Centers

Feedback, direction to source, Updated budget, Program status (SAR), Source Performance data, Program impacts (CAIV), Updated Business Program Documentation


MANAGE PRIME EQUIPMENT ACTIVITIES All current AFMC Logistics IT systems

Estabilshed Air Force Maintenance & Repair systems

Government & Contractor data and information


Equipment analysis report















AFIs, DoDIs, Public Law, Management of Infrastructure, Manpower, Facilities, Personnel documentation

Specific Infrastructure & Manpower Acquired, Resource Funding Acquired, Program Management Directive (PMD)


Updated resource requirements and documentation, Program Impacts, Organizational Structure, Resourcing Status


MANAGE INFORMATION / COMMUNICATION ACTIVITIES Reporting, Change Management, Expectation Management, Tasker and Suspense Management, External and Internal management

Updated Business Program, Technical and Resource Documentation, Definitive Agreement, MAJCOM Budget, Acquisition Program Baseline (APB), Program Impacts


Responses to inquiries, Required program reporting, Audit reports





Program Planning, Including Risk Management

Functional Subject Matter Experts (SME) participation in Risk Management Planning

PPBE Inputs, Increment Management, Expectation Management

Updated Business Program, Technical and Resource Documentation, Definitive Agreement, MAJCOM Budget, Acquisition Program Baseline (APB), Program Impacts, Impacts to Expectation Management Agreement (EMA)


Updated Expectation Management Agreement (EMA), Capability Production Document (CPD), FYDP Budget, Program gaps and disconnects, Updated Acquisition Strategy







REACCOMPLISH THE DEPOT SOURCE OF REPAIR (DSOR) PROCESS AS REQUIRED FOR FIELDED SYSTEMS

Mission assignment, technical data





E2


K2


L2


M2


N2


O2


P2


17 OF 159

TASK DESCRIPTION

IT S

ys

tem

s

TR

IGG

ER

CO

NT

RO

LS

INP

UT

OU

TP

UT

ME

CH

AN

ISM

S

CY

CL

E T

IME

SD

D (

INT

EG

RA

TIO

N)

PL

AN

SU

PP

OR

T

DE

SIG

N S

UP

PO

RT

FIE

LD

SU

PP

OR

T

MA

INT

AIN

PR

OD

UC

TS

IMP

RO

VE

PR

OD

UC

TS

RE

TIR

E P

RO

DU

CT

S

OR

G/P

LA

YE

RS

SA

F,

HQ

, L

OG

RE

SO

UR

CE

S

CO

NS

UM

ED

IMP

RO

VE

ME

NT

O

PP

OR

TU

NIT

IES

CO

NC

EP

T

RE

FIN

EM

EN

T

TE

CH

NO

LO

GY

D

EV

EL

OP

ME

NT

SD

D

(D

EM

ON

ST

RA

TIO

N)

PR

OD

UC

TIO

N &

D

EP

LO

YM

EN

T

OP

ER

AT

ION

S &

S

UP

PO

RT

DE

TE

RM

INE

S

UP

PO

RT

R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

TS

DE

VE

LO

P &

AC

QU

IRE

S

UP

PO

RT

MA

NA

GE

C

AP

AB

ILIT

IES


X X

PERFORM DATA MANAGEMENT N/A Fielded System Data collection systems ongoing

X X

Fielded System

N/A Fielded System ongoing

X X

N/A years to decades

X X

DETERMINE SUPPLY REQUIREMENTS Coming out of ICS Months to Years

X X

OBTAIN / RENEW SUPPLY SOURCES Contractor's Proposal Manpower, funding ongoing

X X

PRODUCE/DELIVER ASSET ongoing

X X

MANAGE COMPUTER RESOURCES SUPPORT N/A

X X

MANAGE SUPPLY/SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (SE) SUSTAINMENT ongoing Strategic Sourcing,

X X

Requisition, usage data Fiscal year cycle

X X

ENSURE MAJCOM PRIORITIZES REQUIREMENT Requisition, usage data Fiscal year cycle

X X


X X


X X

ENSURE ALC EXECUTES LIST Requisition, usage data Fiscal year cycle

X X

ENSURE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (SE) ORDERED Requisition, usage data Fiscal year cycle

X X

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT REPAIR PROCESSDISPOSE OF PARTS ASSET (PIECE PARTS)

X X

Depot schedule 2-4 weeks

X X

PERFORM ORGANIC REPAIR On going

X X

PERFORM CONTRACTOR REPAIR On going

X X

DEVELOP MODIFICATION PROGRAM N/A Approved program

X X




Program Office, System Supportability Manager (SSM) office, MAJCOM, ALCs, Product Centers




TM-86-01, Standard for drawing packages D100, Data Item description for all deliverables, Contract 1423 (DD form)

Informal Communication, AFTO 22,DRs' Product Baseline, Engineering Change Proposal (ECP), Engineering Change Notice (ECN)


Updated Technical Data, Updated Product Baseline


MANAGE TECHNICAL ORDER (TO) SUSTAINMENT Joint Computer Aided Acquisition and Logistics Support (JCALS), Enhanced Technical Information Management System (ETIMS)

Technical Manual Contract Requirements (TMCR) Document TM-86-01, Transition Support Plan (TSP), TO 00-5-3, TO 00-5-1, Technical Order Management Plan (TOMP), Technical Order Verification Plan (TOVP), AFRIMS, TO 00-5-18, AFI 61-204, AFI 21-303, AFI 65-601 Vol. 1, MIL-PRF-32216

Formal technical orders and supporting data, Maintenance Strategy, Product Support Strategy,

EVALUATE SUSTAINING ENGINEERING PROJECTS FOR SUPPORTABILITY REQUIREMENTS

Mil standards, OSSE standards, SERD

Operational capability, Operational feedback (includes accident investigations), Test results, OSSE shortfall, Performance monitoring - Habitability, Survivability, Safety, Environment, Occupational health, RM&A


Engineering dispositions, Potential engineering changes, Recommended modifications, Time Compliance Technical Order (TCTO)s

Database for problem reports


ENSURE DEPOT ACTIVATION ACCOMPLISHED (NO LATER THAN THREE YEARS AFTER INITIAL OPERATIONAL CAPABILITY (IOC))

Mission Assignment, Funds Availability, Depot Maintenance Activation Plan

Program Objective Memorandum (POM) Guidance; AFI, 50-50, Title 10, Core, Public Private Partnerships (PPP)

Provisioning Data; Repair Procedures, Technical Data, Tools, Support Equipment, Trained Technicians, Funding

Depot Maintenance Activation Working Group (DMAWG), ALC, AFMC, Product Centers, Contracting, MAJCOM, Contractor

Depot Capability, Physical Plant established manned and operational, Funding in place, Production and Supplier Management Plans

Public-Private Partnerships (PPP), Data Systems, Spare parts, equipment, facilities, weapon system, personnel

Program Office, ALCs, AFMC, MAJCOM, Contractors

D200, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA)/Basic Sustainment Material (BSM), Weapon System Management Information System (WSMIS), Standard Base Supply System (SBSS)

AFMAN 23-110 Contractor Supported Weapon System (CSWS) Handbook

MIL-PRF-49506 DI-ALSS-81529 DI-ALSS-81530 MIL-HDBK-502 Contractor Supported Weapon System (CSWS) Handbook Budget, maintenance data

ACC, ALCs, ASC, AFMC, MAJCOMs, Contractor

Request for Proposal (RFP), Statement of Work (SOW), Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s, purchase order, Military Interdepartmental Purchase Request (MIPR)

Data Systems, Manpower, SE, Supply Support Plan

Man Hours for Analysis, computations, Budget for travel/meetings

Supply Support Plan developed concurrently with Concept Refinement and Tech Dev during: Pre MS A and MS A

Pre Award Information Exchange System (PIXS) ConWrite FEDBIZOPS, CBIS,

DMS, Basic Sustainment Material (BSM), contract renewal, source selection, modification


Request for Proposal (RFP), requirements


Time, Manpower, contracting Better Performance-Based Logistics Planning/Metrics; Strategic Sourcing

DD250/J018, 375D, Standard Base Supply System (SBSS), Air Force Equipment Management System (AFEMS), Weapon System Management Information System (WSMIS)

Replenishment requirement and modification, an order


Statement of Work (SOW), SSIPT, MIL-PRF-49506 DI-ALSS-81529 DI-ALSS-81530 MIL-HDBK-502 Contractor Supported Weapon System (CSWS) Handbook Budget


Spares assets, end items, DD250, bill of lading

Data Systems, Manpower, SE, Supply Support Plan, Depot Test Equipment, DLRs/Materials, ATPs

DLRs, transportation, Inventory, Man-hours, time, production line, Supply Chain

Better Maintenance Planning--or better Performance-Based Logistics Planning/Metrics, better inventory locations, material management and forecasting


Best Practice (rescinded AFI 800-14 & AFMCI 800-21)



Updated Computer Resources Lifecycle Management Plan (CRLCMP)



Life Cycle Support for computer resources

DO35, DO43, Standard Base Supply System (SBSS), D200, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), Government and Industry Data Exchange Program (GIDEP), DR SYS/GO21, 375D, D165B, Air Force Equipment Management System (AFEMS), Weapon System Management Information System (WSMIS), Government On-Line Data (GOLD) (et al)

Usage forecast, D200C, DMS, CLS bill


Statement of Work (SOW), IPT, usage data, quality deficiency report

Product Centers, ALCs, AFMC, MAJCOMs, Contractor

Supply Metrics, CDRL Reports

SE, STE, DLRs, GSD/MSD Budgets, Data Systems

Consumable items (XB3s), Special Test Equipment/Support Equipment (STE/SE), Beyond Economical Repair (BER) Reparable (XD2) Assets, Sourcing, Contracting, Manpower

MANAGE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (SE) REQUIREMENTS SYSTEM


AFMAN 23-110, Contractor Supported Weapon System (CSWS) Handbook

Air Force Equipment Management System (AFEMS), Standard Base Supply System (SBSS)


Support equipment Metrics

Support equipment, data systems, budgets

Manpower, facilities, ALCs, sourcing








ENSURE MAJCOM PRIORITIZED LIST SENT TO WR-ALC 585 CBSS





Support equipment Metrics, Validated priority buy list



ENSURE CONSOLIDATED ASSET MANAGEMENT (CAM) FUNDS APPLIED



Air Force Equipment Management System (AFEMS), Standard Base Supply System (SBSS), Validated priority buy list





Air Force Equipment Management System (AFEMS), D035, D200C


Air Force Equipment Management System (AFEMS), Standard Base Supply System (SBSS), Validated priority buy list pushed out to item managers












D200, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA)/Basic Sustainment Material (BSM), DO35G,

ENSURE MAINTENANCE CHECK FLIGHT ACTIVITIES ARE PERFORMED


T01-1-300, AFI 21-101, AFI 21-103, AFI 21-107, AFTO series 781 forms, Weapons System Specific Technical Orders

Weapons platform, tech orders, Time Compliance Technical Order (TCTO), major modifications, fuels, cryogenics, other petroleum based products

Defense Contracts Management Agency (DCMA) pilot, depot personnel

released aircraft, signed AFTO series 781 forms

Defense Contracts Management Agency (DCMA) pilot, depot personnel

fuels, cryogenics, other petroleum based products

EXPRESS/GO73, PDMSS, Standard Base Supply System (SBSS), DR/GO21, DO35T/DSS, GO19C, D200

Tech orders, scheduled/unscheduled maintenance

Tech orders, process guide, regulations, operational tempo, laws 50/50/Cost Oriented Resource Estimating (CORE), Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), maintenance schedule, stock working level, contracts, PHS&T

Maintenance action form 202, 107, 22, etc, MAJCOM, A4, A3, A5, formal request for repair or software maintenance(206, 103, project order , surge, express orders), physical assets, tech orders, performance work statement, PHS&T requirements, Military Interdepartmental Purchase Request (MIPR), purchase request, contract actions

Equipment specialist, maintainers, engineers, item managers, contractors

Disposition 202, serviceable asset, condemned asset

support plans, process guides, funding, trained maintainers, support equipment, facilities, parts, contract, GFE/GFP

Consumable parts, supply items, support equipment time, fuel, power, etc.

G009, Wide-Area Work Flow (WAWF), GO21, Government and Industry Data Exchange Program (GIDEP), DD250/JO18, D200

Tech orders, scheduled/unscheduled maintenance

Tech orders, process guide, regulations, operational tempo, laws 50/50/Cost Oriented Resource Estimating (CORE), Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), maintenance schedule, stock working level, contracts, PHS&T rag

Maintenance action form 202, 107, 22, etc, MAJCOM, A4, A3, A5, formal request for repair or software maintenance(206, 103, project order , surge, express orders), physical assets, tech orders, performance work statement, PHS&T requirements, Military Interdepartmental Purchase Request (MIPR), purchase request, contract actions

Equipment specialist, maintainers, engineers, item managers, contractors

Disposition 202, serviceable asset, condemned asset

support plans, process guides, funding, trained maintainers, support equipment, facilities, parts, contract, GFE/GFP

Consumable parts, supply items, support equipment time, fuel, power, etc.

Tech Data, Identified capability shortfall, Deficiencies, Technology opportunity, Diminished Manufacturing Support (DMS)

Configuration Control Boards (CCB), Program Manager boards, AFI 63-1101


Program office, MAJCOM, System Supportability Manager (SSM) office, Contractor w/govt oversight

Program office, MAJCOM, System Supportability Manager (SSM) office

E2


K2


L2


M2


N2


O2


P2


18 OF 159

TASK DESCRIPTION

IT S

ys

tem

s

TR

IGG

ER

CO

NT

RO

LS

INP

UT

OU

TP

UT

ME

CH

AN

ISM

S

CY

CL

E T

IME

SD

D (

INT

EG

RA

TIO

N)

PL

AN

SU

PP

OR

T

DE

SIG

N S

UP

PO

RT

FIE

LD

SU

PP

OR

T

MA

INT

AIN

PR

OD

UC

TS

IMP

RO

VE

PR

OD

UC

TS

RE

TIR

E P

RO

DU

CT

S

OR

G/P

LA

YE

RS

SA

F,

HQ

, L

OG

RE

SO

UR

CE

S

CO

NS

UM

ED

IMP

RO

VE

ME

NT

O

PP

OR

TU

NIT

IES

CO

NC

EP

T

RE

FIN

EM

EN

T

TE

CH

NO

LO

GY

D

EV

EL

OP

ME

NT

SD

D

(D

EM

ON

ST

RA

TIO

N)

PR

OD

UC

TIO

N &

D

EP

LO

YM

EN

T

OP

ER

AT

ION

S &

S

UP

PO

RT

DE

TE

RM

INE

S

UP

PO

RT

R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

TS

DE

VE

LO

P &

AC

QU

IRE

S

UP

PO

RT

MA

NA

GE

C

AP

AB

ILIT

IES

ACQUIRE MODIFICATION SOURCE

X X

DESIGN / INTEGRATE/TEST THE MOD

X X

TRIAL INSTALL / KIT PROOF T.O. 00-5-1

X X

PERFORM MODIFICATION SYSTEM LEVEL TEST N/A

X X

INITIATE MODIFICATION KIT PRODUCTION AND INSTALLATION AFI-63-1101,

X X

VERIFY DECISION ON SYSTEM DISPOSITION N/A AFI's and AFMCI's System Disposition,

X X

VERIFY DECISION ON UNIT DISPOSITION (AIRCRAFT TAIL #) N/A AFI's and AFMCI's

X X

N/A AFI's and AFMCI's Draw down strategy Varies

X X

AFI's and AFMCI's Draw down strategy Varies

X X

SEND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (SE) to DEPOT AFI's and AFMCI's Draw down strategy Varies

X X

FILL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (SE) BASE SHORTAGES AFI's and AFMCI's Draw down strategy Varies

X X

AFI's and AFMCI's Draw down strategy Varies

X X

UPDATE MIGRATION PLAN (ANNUAL) N/A AFI's and AFMCI's Migration Plan signed Data system 1-6 months

X X

EXECUTE DISPOSITION STRATEGY N/A AFI's and AFMCI's

X X

MANAGE TIME COMPLIANCE TECHNICAL ORDER (TCTO) PROCESS

Pre Award Information Exchange System (PIXS), ConWrite, FEDBIZOPS


Funding, Contract, Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s,

Product baseline, PHS&T requirements, Funding,

Program office, MAJCOM, System Supportability Manager (SSM) office Contractor w/govt oversight

Selected source (Contract or Organic equivalent)




Configuration Control Board (CCB), Engineering Change Proposal (ECP), Engineering Change Notice (ECN), AFI 63-1101

Product Baseline, Selected source (Contract or Organic equivalent)

Program office, MAJCOM, System Supportability Manager (SSM) office Contractor w/govt oversight

Updated Tech data, Time Compliance Technical Order (TCTO), Demonstrated Design, Test procedures


Interactive Electronic Technical Manuals (IETMS), Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS), Core Automated Maintenance System (CAMS)


Product Baseline, Updated Tech data, Demonstrated Design, Time Compliance Technical Order (TCTO)

Program office, MAJCOM, System Supportability Manager (SSM) office, MAJCOM, Field Units

Updated Tech Data, Validated / Verified Time Compliance Technical Order (TCTO)/Tech Data, Installed system



T.O. 00-5-1, Applicable Tech Data

Product baseline, Updated tech data, Modified system, Test Procedures

Program office, MAJCOM, System Supportability Manager (SSM) office, MAJCOM, Field Units Contractor w/govt oversight

Updated Tech Data, Verified design and performance, Discrepancy reports (feedback) Updated product baseline


Core Automated Maintenance System (CAMS), Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS), Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), D220


Product Baseline, Updated Tech data, Time Compliance Technical Order (TCTO), Verified Design

Program office, MAJCOM, System Supportability Manager (SSM) office, MAJCOM, Field Units Contractor w/govt oversight

Modified operational system


UPDATE THE WEAPON SYSTEM SUPPORT PROGRAM (WSSP) DATABASE

Decision to remove system from active inventory

System assessment, Migration Plan, Force Structure, Foreign Military Sales (FMS) Interest, Treaties,

System Supportability Manager (SSM), MAJCOM, Aerospace Maintenance and Regeneration Group (AMARG), ALC, Museum, Foreign Military Sales (FMS), Product Center

Foreign Military Sales (FMS), Commercial Sales, Aerospace Maintenance and Regeneration Group (AMARG) / Long Term Storage / Reclamation / Regeneration / Attrition fillers, Museum, Trainer

System Supportability Manager (SSM), MAJCOM, Aerospace Maintenance and Regeneration Group (AMARG), Museum, Foreign Military Sales (FMS),


System assessment, Migration Plan, Force Structure, System Disposition


Unit Disposition, Schedule for Disposition



DETERMINE DRAWDOWN STRATEGY FOR SUPPORT STRUCTURE


Inventory Parameters (D200), Unit Disposition, Schedule for disposition, Spares issues, Consider prior decisions / strategies, Disposal issues, SE/ATE




PROVIDE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (SE) DISPOSITION (MAJCOM OR ITEM MANAGER)Standard Base Supply System (SBSS), Air Force Equipment Management System (AFEMS)


















SEND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (SE) to DEFENSE REUTILIZATION MANAGEMENT SERVICE (DRMS)












Force Structure, Updated Migration Plan, Disposition Strategy (Decision / Action Plan)


Inactive System Dispositioned


E2


K2


L2


M2


N2


O2


P2


TASK #TASK # PROCESS NAME:PROCESS NAME: ENTRANCE CRITERIA:ENTRANCE CRITERIA:

1.03

Define Supportability Objectives Functional Needs AnalysisJoint Capabilities Document (JCD)Initial Capabilities Document (ICD)Capability Required and Operational ConceptKey Performance Parameters (KPPs)Target Audience Description (TAD

DESCRIPTION:DESCRIPTION:

CHECKLIST SUBTASKS:CHECKLIST SUBTASKS:TASKTASK SOURCE DOCUMENTATIONSOURCE DOCUMENTATION PHASEPHASE

(Pre-Milestone A)

(See Enclosure 7)

Use entire document

The supportability objectives checklist provides guidance to define the supportability analysis for the program. The supportability analysis is an analytical tool, conducted as part of the systems engineering process to determine the most cost-effectively support of the system over its entire life cycle. It provides the basis for related design requirements to include Technical Orders (TO)s, Support Equipment (SE), Packaging, Handling, Storage & Transportation (PHS&T), Reliability, Maintainability & Availabilty (RMA), Producability, Interoperability and Maintenance Concept that may be included in specifications.

1. Ensure a logistician is involved on the team that develops the Systems Engineering Plan

CJCSI 3170.01F Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS)Concept Refinement / Pre KDP-A Concept Studies

2. Interpret user needs including Human Systems Integration (HSI) implications, constraints, issues and develop strategy for addressing

Click JCIDS Process link. Go to Management Activities, Chapter 11.1.

3. Consider TO’s SE and PHS&T, Reliability, Maintainability & Availabilty (RMA), Producability, Interoperability Supply Support, and Maintenance Concept that may be included in specifications.

4. Analyze Operational Capabilities & Environmental Constraints

5. Develop Concept Performance (& Constraints) Definition & Verification Objectives

Systems Engineering Plan Prep Guide

6. Decompose Concept Functional Definition into Component Concepts & Assessment Objectives7. Develop Component Concepts Defense Acquisition Guidebook

(See chapters 2 “Defense Acquisition Program Goals and Strategy”, 4 “Systems Engineering”, and 6 “Human Systems Integration”)

DoD 4140.1-R DoD Materiel Management Regulation

DoD 5000.2 Operation of the Defense Acquisition System

Designing and Assessing Supportability in DoD Weapon Systems (A Guide to Increased Reliability and Reduced Logistics Footprint)

(See Chapter 3, but peruse entire document for further information)

AFI 63-107, Integrated Product Support and Planning Assessment

AFI 63-111, Contract Support for Systems and Equipment

http://www.dtic.mil/cjcs_directives/cdata/unlimit/3170_01.pdf

http://www.acq.osd.mil/sse/docs/SEP-Prep-Guide-Ver-2-0_18Oct07.pdf

https://akss.dau.mil/dag/

http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/414001r.pdf

http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/html/500002.htm

https://acc.dau.mil/GetAttachment.aspx?id=32566&pname=file&aid=6167

http://www.e-publishing.af.mil/shared/media/epubs/AFI63-107.pdf


EXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:Systems Engineering Plan (SEP)

Use document based on Contracting strategy.

AFI 10-601, Capabilities Based Requirements Development Document

This document support JCIDS process

AFI 10-602, Determining Mission Capability and Supportability Requirements

Understand paragraph 1-2, and use appropriate attachments that apply to your program.

MIL-HDBK-502 DoD Handbook Acquisition Logistics

General information document on Acquisition Logistics



http://assist.daps.dla.mil/docimages/0000/72/62/HDBK502.PD1


1.05Joint Operations ConceptsFunctional Needs AnalysisFunctional Solution Analysis



See paragraph 3.3

NOTES:

Include Product Support Capabilities in Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) Plan

The AoA plan is approved by the Milestone Decision Authority in conjunction with the Concept Decision. AoA is an evaluation of the performance, operational effectiveness, operational suitability, and estimated costs of alternative systems to meet a mission capability. The analysis assesses the advantages and disadvantages of alternatives being considered to satisfy capabilities, including the sensitivity of each alternative to possible changes in key assumptions or variables.

1. Ensure a logistician is involved on the team that provides input to the Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) Plan

CJCSI 3170.01, Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS)Concept Refinement / Pre KDP-A Concept Studies

2. Interpret User Needs Defines JCIDS process. Type “Supportability” in Edit, Find and Find Next to understanding the support role in process.

3. Analyze Operational Capabilities, Capability Gaps, Energy Efficiency, Alternate Fuels considerations and Environmental Constraints. Analysis of Alternatives Plan

4. Analyze Threat and Operational Environment5. Summarize results of the analysis

a. Include alternative operating and system support concepts with specific consideration of performance-based options

b. Consider the physical and operational maintenance environment of the proposed system

CJCSM 3170.01B : Operation of the Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System with attachments to the Initial Capabilities Document (ICD)

Document provides a general understanding on JCIDS. See Enclosure E for ICD information.

– Data collected and analyzed during AoA can be very useful for performing a Performance Based Logistics business cases analysis.


– Life cycle related data in all program deliverables must be updated during subsequent phases, especially prior to milestone decisions.

Entire document useful in building your plan


Logisticians should ensure product support is addressed. Product Support includes: Technical Data, Training and Training Support, Support Equipment, Packaging, Handling, Storage & Transportation, Supply Support, Facilities, Computer Resources Support, Design Interface, Maintenance Planning and Manpower/Personnel.

Entire document provides insight to Integrated Product Support in building your AoA plan.


Good reference document for programs with Contract Support strategy.

AFI 10-601, Capabilities Based Requirements Development Document

http://www.dtic.mil/cjcs_directives/cdata/unlimit/3170_01.pdf#page=15

http://akss.dau.mil/dag/DoD5000.asp?view=document&rf=GuideBook%5CIG_c3.3.asp

http://www.dtic.mil/cjcs_directives/cdata/unlimit/m317001.pdf





See checklists D-1, D-7, 12, F-1EXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) PlanInitial Capabilities Document (ICD)

Concept Refinement / Pre KDP-A Concept Studies

This document supports the JCIDS process

AFI 10-602Understand para 1-2 and use appropriate attachments that apply to your program.

MIL-HDBK-502, Acquisition Logistics


Office of Aerospace Studies Analysis Handbook

Functional Systems Analysis Implementation Guide

Independent Logistics Assessment (ILA) Handbook


https://acc.dau.mil/CommunityBrowser.aspx?id=32543

http://www.oas.kirtland.af.mil/AoAHandbook/AoA-Handbook.pdf

http://www.oas.kirtland.af.mil/guides.html

https://afkm.wpafb.af.mil/ASPs/docman/Process/ProcessDOCFunctions.asp?DocID=467429&Function=ViewDocument&FolderID=OO-LG-MC-36-8&Filter=OO-LG-MC-36


1.09Analysis of Alternatives PlanPreliminary Integrated ArchitectureBest Material Approach(es)



d. Analyze impacts to Maintenance Concepts

NOTES:

Include Product Support Capabilities in Preferred System Concept

Key to this initial step of concept refinement is to ensure that all drivers of the concept definition are completely captured and managed as an integrated whole, and that all of the drivers can be met by each of the concept alternatives under consideration. This defines the expectations of the overall system concept, and defines the trade space and risk associated with each of the constraints, above. Defining the trade space and risk enables the comprehensive analysis of system alternatives, and allows a rational selection of a preferred system concept. The preferred system concept should strike the best balance in providing the needed capabilities within the constraints on the program.

1. Ensure a logistician is involved on the team that provides input to the Preferred System Concept

CJCSI 3170.01, Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS)Concept Refinement / Pre KDP-A Concept Studies

2. Interpret User Needs

Defines JCIDS process. Type “Supportability” in Edit, Find and Find Next to understand support role in the process.

3. Analyze Operational Capabilities, Capability Gaps, and Environmental Constraints.

4. Analyze Threat and Operational Environment

CJCSM 3170.01B : Operation of the Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System with attachments to the Initial Capabilities Document (ICD)

5. Analyze Preliminary Integrated ArchitectureDocument provides a general understanding on JCIDS. See Enclosure E for ICD information

6. Summarize results of the analysis

a. Include alternative operating and system support concepts with specific consideration of performance-based options


b. Consider the physical and operational maintenance environment of the proposed system

Entire document useful in building your plan

c. Analyze the Human Systems Integration (HSI) implications of the system concept


Entire document provides insight to Integrated Product Support.

– Data collected and analyzed during AoA can be very useful for performing a Performance Based Logistics business cases analysis.

– Life cycle related data in all program deliverables must be updated during subsequent phases, especially prior to milestone decisions.


Good reference document for programs with Contract Support strategy

AFI 10-601, Capabilities Based Requirements Development



http://www.dtic.mil/cjcs_directives/cdata/unlimit/m317001.pdf





(See Enclosure 7

EXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:Preferred System Concept



Understand paragraph 1-2 and use appropriate attachments that apply to your program.

System EngineeringChapter 4 Defense Acquisiton Guidebook

Defense Acquisition Guidebook(See chapters 2 “Defense Acquisition Program Goals and Strategy”, 4 “Systems Engineering”, and 6 “Human Systems Integration”)



General information on Acquisition Logistics


See checklists D-1, D-3, D-7, D-12, F-1


https://afkm.wpafb.af.mil/ASPs/DocMan/DOCDisplay.asp?Filter=OO-DP-MC-45&DocID=543881





Click on Task ID # to return

TASK #TASK # PROCESS NAME:PROCESS NAME:

2.04


CHECKLIST SUBTASKS:CHECKLIST SUBTASKS:TASKTASKThe logistician should consider the following key logistics criteria:

EXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:Approved Technology Development Strategy (TDS)Identification of Key Performance Parameters (KPPs) and/or Key Systems Attributes (KSAs)Market Research for product support capabilitiesRisk Management Plan (document initial support related risk and risk mitigation planning)

Develop Technology Development Strategy to Include Product Support

The Technical Development Strategy (TDS) documents the rationale for adopting an evolutionary or a single-step-to-full-capability strategy. For evolutionary acquisition, either spiral or incremental, the TDS shall include a preliminary description of how the program will be divided into technology spirals and development increments to include number of prototype units that may be produced and deployed during technology development. The TDS will also define the support, specific performance goals, and exit criteria. Upon approval of the TDS and selection of an initial concept, the project will enter the Technology Development phase at MS A. The TDS is approved by the MDA at Milestone A for potential ACAT I and IA programs. The purpose of this phase is to reduce technology risk and to determine the appropriate set of technologies to be integrated into a full system.

1. Forecast the physical and operational maintenance environment of the proposed system

2. Given the forecasted environment, assess the functional characteristics of the proposed system, its complexity, and the obstacles and enablers to effective sustainment in that environment

3. Assess the impact of the proposed system on the maintenance capabilities planned for the period in which the system will be introduced

4. Assess preliminary manpower and personnel requirements and constraints in both quantity and skill levels, and use of contractor support

5. Begin compilation of information and requirements for logistics footprint reductions, deployment requirements, and other factors affecting the in-theater operational concept

6. Initiate the development of operating and support reliability objectives and their corresponding benefits and resource requirements; consider the performance histories of prior systems or systems of similar capability where feasible

7. Assess the concept and technology with regard to their ability to facilitate the use of embedded diagnostics, prognostics, and similar maintenance enablers

8. Initiate the compilation and assessment of data on the projected sustainment demand, standardization of platforms, and required support equipment

9. Develop Rough Order of Magnitude Life Cycle Cost estimates


ENTRANCE CRITERIA:ENTRANCE CRITERIA:Supportability ObjectivesInitial Capabilities Document (ICD)Analysis of Alternatives (AoA)


CHECKLIST SUBTASKS:CHECKLIST SUBTASKS:SOURCE DOCUMENTATIONSOURCE DOCUMENTATION PHASEPHASE

EXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:Approved Technology Development Strategy (TDS)Identification of Key Performance Parameters (KPPs) and/or Key Systems Attributes (KSAs)Market Research for product support capabilitiesRisk Management Plan (document initial support related risk and risk mitigation planning)

documents the rationale for adopting an evolutionary or a single-step-to-full-capability strategy. For evolutionary acquisition, either spiral or incremental, the TDS shall include a preliminary description of how the program will be divided into technology spirals and development increments to include number of prototype units that may be produced and deployed during technology development. The TDS will also define the support, specific performance

and selection of an initial concept, the project will enter the Technology e TDS is approved by the MDA at Milestone A for potential ACAT I and IA programs. The

purpose of this phase is to reduce technology risk and to determine the appropriate set of technologies to be integrated into a

DoDI 5000.2 Operation of the Defense Acquisition System Paragraph 3.5.4Concept Refinement / Pre KDP-A Concept Studies

NSSA Policy 03-01 for Space Programs

Technology Program Management Model v2

DOD Technology Readiness Assessment (TRA) Deskbook Appendix F

https://akss.dau.mil/dag/DoD5002/DoD5002-3.3.asp

http://www.aiaa.org/tc/sos/Launch_Management_Guide/Appendix%20B%5CNSS_03_01.pdf

https://afkm.wpafb.af.mil/ASPs/Search/DocView.asp?Page=%2FDocView%2Easp%3FDocID%3D2087824

https://afkm.wpafb.af.mil/ASPs/Search/DocView.asp?Page=%2FDocViewOnly%2Easp%3FDocID%3D798565


2.05

Joint Capabilities & Development System AnalysisInitial Capabilities DocumentLife Cycle Management Plan (LCMP)Defined Supportability ObjectivesAnalysis of Alternatives PlanLogistics footprint reductions requirementsDeployment requirementsTarget Audience Description



g. Energy Efficiency and Alternate Fuels considerations

(2.3.15)

Develop Initial Product Support Strategy in LCMP (To include Performance Based Logistics (PBL), PPP, Logistics Elements, etc.)

A Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) is a comprehensive document that consolidates the weapon system life cycle acquisition management and product support strategies from concept refinement through reclamation/disposal. It is a document that must be maintained to remain compliant with revised/new DOD policy and statutory requirements. It represents a corporate AF position on how to best execute and manage a specific program and requires participation from all program stakeholders in its development and update.

1. Review the LCMP Guide, Section 8.10. Use the given order to organize the information gained from the following steps.

LCMP Guide (8.10) Concept Refinement / Pre KDP-A Concept Studies2. Review the Joint Capabilities and Development System

analysis forDefense Acquisition Guidebook (4.0, 5.0 and 6)

a. Life cycle cost:DoD Template for Application of TLCSM and PBL In the Weapon System Life Cycle

b. Logistics supportability treated as an operational performance capability that is inherent to systems design and development

Request for Proposal (RFP) Information

c. Functional needs analysis that includes supportability as an inherent part of defining capability needs

Technology and Industrial Base Plans, 10 U.S.C. 2440

d. Supportability as a key attribute to be defined, found within the "capabilities based" approach to setting formal warfighter requirements

Technology Readiness Assessment Deskbook (TRA)

e. Initial establishment of supportability and support-related performance criteria

Designing and Assessing Supportability in DoD Weapon Systems: A Guide to Increased Reliability and Reduced Logistics Footprint 2003 (3.3)

f. Doctrine, Organization, Training, Materiel, Leadership and education, Personnel, and Facilities (DOTMLPF) considerations to include key logistics criteria that will help minimize logistics footprint and reduce cost

System Operational Effectiveness (SOE) ref 1.3 & 2.2

3. Review the ICD for: PBL: PM's Product Support Guide (3.0 – 7.0)

a. Product support concept and needed capabilities What is a Systems Engineering Plan (2.3.7)

b. Reductions in logistics footprint & system life cycle costs What is a Modular Open Systems Approach (MOSA)

c. Potential constraints on operating and support resource requirements

4. Refer to the forecast of the physical and operational maintenance environment of the proposed system. Given the forecast, assess the functional characteristics of the proposed system, its complexity, and the obstacles and enablers to effective sustainment in that environment

MOSA during Concept Refinement (5.4.1.1.2)

https://afkm.wpafb.af.mil/ASPs/DocMan/DOCDisplayOnly.asp?Filter=OO-AQ-DB&DocID=183691

http://akss.dau.mil/dag/welcome.asp

http://www.acq.osd.mil/log/lpp/tlcm/TLCSMGuidanceTemplate.pdf

https://afkm.wpafb.af.mil/ASPs/DocMan/DOCDisplayOnly.asp?Filter=OO-PK-DB&DocID=4535

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode10/usc_sec_10_00002440----000-.html

https://afkm.wpafb.af.mil/ASPs/DocMan/DOCDisplayOnly.asp?Filter=OO-ST-DB&DocID=798565

https://afkm.wpafb.af.mil/ASPs/DocMan/DOCDisplay.asp?Filter=HP-HS&DocID=464031

https://afkm.wpafb.af.mil/ASPs/DocMan/DOCDisplay.asp?Filter=HP-HS&DocID=464031

https://centernet.hanscom.af.mil/acqdev/PMTB/ProductSupport/docs/PSG%20draft%203jun04.doc

http://akss.dau.mil/dag/Guidebook/IG_c2.3.7.asp

https://afkm.wpafb.af.mil/ASPs/Search/DocViewHigh.asp?Page=http%3A%2F%2Fakss%2Edau%2Emil%2Fdag%2FGuidebook%2FIG%5Fc2%2E3%2E15%2Easp&SearchMethod=Phrase&q1=%22mosa%22&DocKey=http%3A%2F%2Fakss%2Edau%2Emil%2Fdag%2FGuidebook%2FIG%5Fc2%2E3%2E15%2Easp%40FMALL

http://akss.dau.mil/dag/Guidebook/IG_c5.4.1.1.2.asp

(Enclosure 7)

c. Energy Efficiency and Alternate Fuels considerations

EXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:Evaluation of Product Support Capabilities System Engineering Plan (SEP) Support & Maintenance Concepts & TechnologiesRequest for Proposal (RFP)Approved and Finalized Preferred Solution from the AoAInputs to Technology Development Strategy (TDS) Cost/Manpower estimates Technology Development Strategy Acquisition Decision Memorandum (ADM)Draft Capabilities Development Document (CDD)Updated Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP)


5. Include assessment of the impact of the proposed system on the current maintenance capabilities and based on initial capability analysis system solution, and target audience description (TAD) identify Human Systems Integration (HSI) implications and constraints

MIL-HDBK-502 DoD Handbook Acquisition Logistics (ALL)

6. Influence product design with Life Cycle Logistics (LCL) for affordable System Operational Effectiveness (SOE)

AFI 63-107 Operation of Capabilities Based Acquisition System (1.4.4.2)

7. Include the evaluation of the Product Support Capabilities Independent Cost Estimate: Operational Manpower requirements, 10 U.S.C.2434

8. Review projected sustainment demand, standardization of platforms and required equipment


9. Ensure Product Support elements are input into draft Systems Engineering Plan (SEP), encompassing Product Support (PS) Systems Engineering (SE) requirements.

10. Review the Request for Proposal (RFP) for Systems Engineering (SE) concepts (Limit to objectives and goals identified in the Mission Needs Statement (MNS), constraints, customer objectives/goals and other boundary objectives/goals identified in program direction) Ensure Energy Efficiency and Alternate Fuels considerations are included.

Defense Acquisition Guidebook

11. Review the Best Material Approach and include the preferred Product Support concept

( See Chapter 6 “Human Systems Integration”)

12. Review the Technology Development Strategy for Product Support concepts such as


a. Conceptual impact on national technology or industrial baseb. Critical Technology Information Protection

13. Review Modular Open Systems Approach (MOSA) strategy summary written by the program manager for


a. Life cycle supportability See checklists D-2, D-3, D-4, D-6, D-9, D-10, E-1b. Financial and support functions to make trade-off decisions

that affect system readiness and cost

c. Conceptual impact on national technology or industrial based. Critical Technology Information Protection

14. Review exit criteria from the Acquisition Decision Memorandum (ADM) for Product Support issues



http://frwebgate3.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/waisgate.cgi?WAISdocID=81082918868+0+0+0&WAISaction=retrieve






2.06 Program Management Directive (PMD)



See checklist F-1

EXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:Updated Initial Capability Document (ICD)Updated CDDUpdated Life Cycle Mgmt Plan (LCMP)Updated Draft Capability Development Document (CDD)Signed Expectation Management Plan

Ensure Supportability Included in Expectation Management Agreements (EMA)

The EMA is a jointly developed and formally documented agreement between the Program Office and the primary operator to proactively resolve or deconflict potential issues to include cost, schedule, performance, and logistics expectations over the life of the program. Providing the operator the capabilities needed when they are required, at the most affordable cost is the cornerstone to building credibility.

1. Ensure the CONOPS, to include usage rates, etc, are included in the EMA. (Example: Availability Rates, Mean Time between Failure, etc.)

LCMP Guide System Development & Demonstration

2. Life Cycle Management Plan addresses the Life Cycle Support Strategy of the system/product.

3. Ensure Performance Based Logistics (PBL) tenets are considered.

4. Minimize logistics requirements (Logistic Footprint) to include sustainment strategy – reprocurement of systems, subsystems, components, spares, and services beyond initial production. Include Government Furnished Equipment (GFE).

AFI 63-101 Operations of Capability Based Acquisition System Chapter 2.1.5 and 2.2.2

5. Consider disciplined maintenance procedures that preserve the system and end-item operational safety, suitability, and effectiveness throughout the operational life.

6. Establish performance metrics for assessing program success throughout the acquisition lifecycle that ensure supportability criteria is included in the EMA (i.e. mean time between failure (MTBF), maintenance cycle time, footprint reduction, supply change management). Independent Logistics Assessment (ILA) Handbook

7. Coordinate with the appropriate ALC for Packaging, Handling, Storage & Transportation, and Marking requirements

8. Ensure the user addresses / identifies facilities and site survey requirements (Ref checklist 2.24)





2.07

Pre-Solicitation Source Selection PlanningSource Selection IPT including logistics as applicableSource Selection Authority AssignmentAcquisition PlanBrief Description of Requirements/PMDRequest For Proposal (RFP) Section L & M



(See enclosure 7)

Chapter 3 section 6

Include Supportability in the Source Selection Plan (SSP)

The SSP is a plan that describes how the source selection will be organized, how proposals will be evaluated and analyzed, and how sources will be selected. Sections L & M of the RFP are generally attached to the SSP. Well thought out evaluation criteria typically including supportability are a part of sections L & M. We select a vendor with the best product support value. Supportability criteria must be well designed and utilized in the source selection process. Source selection IAW the SSP will be conducted following the release of the RFP ending with the contract award.

1. Ensure integrated baseline addresses product support strategy AFMC SS Plan Guide (All) Concept Refinement / Pre KDP-A Concept Studies

2. Develop life cycle product support areas of evaluation3. Review supportability requirements assessing operational availability, logistics footprint, cost effectiveness and RAMS in the system engineering process

DFARS 215.3 Technology Development / Phase A Concept Development4. Participate on the source selection team to address product

support concerns

5. Draft request for proposal – sections L&M for product support to include Technical Data, Support Equipment, Supply Support, Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages and Packaging, Handling, Storage & Transportation and Training. Consideration must also be given to Energy Efficiency, Alternate Fuels, reclamation, demilitarization and disposal. Ensure this plan is executed in checklist 2.09 Task 3.


System Development & Demonstration

(See chapters 2 “Defense Acquisition Program Goals and Strategy”, 4 “Systems Engineering”, 6 “ Human Systems Integration”, 8 “Pre-Contract Award” and 11 “Total Life Cycle Systems Management”)

Production and Deployment / Phase B Preliminary Design/Phase C Complete Design & Build Approval


AFFARS Mandatory Procedures 5315.3

AFFARS 5315.305(c)Supportability Requirements

DoD 4140.1-R DoD Materiel Management Regulation

DoD 4160.21-M, Defense Materiel Disposition Manual

DoD 4160.21-M-1, Defense Demilitarization Manual

https://www.afmc-mil.wpafb.af.mil/HQ-AFMC/PK/pkp/polvault/guides/sspguide.doc

http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/dfars/pdf/r20060908/215_3.pdf



https://www.safaq.hq.af.mil/contracting/affars/5315/mandatory/MP5315.3.doc

http://www.peterson.af.mil/hqafspc/contracting/docs/ChecklistSSPPlan.doc



EXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:Complete Source Selection Plan

AFMAN 23-110 USAF Supply Manual

http://www.e-publishing.af.mil/shared/media/epubs/afman23-110.pdf


2.09

Source Selection PlanTechnical/Acquisition StrategyProduct Support StrategyMilestone Decision Authority

DESCRIPTION:DESCRIPTION:RFP is used in negotiated acquisitions to communicate the government’s requirements and solicit proposals.CHECKLIST SUBTASKS:CHECKLIST SUBTASKS:TASKTASK SOURCE DOCUMENTATIONSOURCE DOCUMENTATION PHASEPHASE

Chapter 26EXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:Released RFP

Include Supportability Requirements in Request for Proposal (RFP)

1. Ensure product support requirements are identified by logistics elements including Training and training support, Technical Data, Support Equipment, Packaging, Handling, Storage & Transportation, Supply Support, Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages and Marking requirements. Coordinate with ALCs to ensure adequate packaging / transportation requirements are on contract (include data). Ensure Container Design Retrieval System (CDRS) testing requirements are in RFP.

AFI 63-107 Integrated Product Support Planning and Assessment (1.4.1.4)Concept Refinement / Pre KDP-A Concept Studies

2. Determine life cycle product support activities for the program applicable to all milestones.

Defense Acquisition Guidebook (4.0 & 5.0 & 6)

3. Develop RFP sections L & M IAW plan developed in checklist 2.07 Task 5 to include product support strategy discriminators such as operational availability, logistics footprint, migration planning and maintenance concept.

Solicitation – Section M Evaluation Factors for Award Guide and Template Technology Development / Phase A Concept Development

4. Develop and revise all sections of the draft RFP for product support where appropriate.

Solicitation – Section L Instructions, conditions, and Notices to Offerors Guide and Template

5. Secure logistic experts as source selection evaluators and advisors.

Capabilities/Requirements System Development & Demonstration

6. Evaluate contractor proposals against product support RFP requirements.

Technology Insert

7. Communicate product support strategy with Industry. Government Industry Data Exchange Program (GIDEP)Production and Deployment / Phase B Preliminary Design/Phase C Complete Design &

8. Identify and include in RFP technical source data requirements. AFMCMAN 23-3 Cataloging & Standardization

9. Develop product support evaluation factors and sub-factors



https://www.afmc-mil.wpafb.af.mil/organizations/HQ-AFMC/PK/pkp/polvault/guides/mtemp.doc

https://www.afmc-mil.wpafb.af.mil/organizations/HQ-AFMC/PK/pkp/polvault/guides/ltemp.doc



http://www.gidep.org/

http://www.e-publishing.af.mil/shared/media/epubs/AFMCMAN23-3.pdf


2.12 Program Management Directive (PMD)



(Chap. 11.3.1.4.2)

(Para. 2.2.7)

Include Product Support Activities in Integrated Master Plan/Integrated Master Schedule (IMP/IMS)

The IMP/’IMS provides a basis for effective communication, serve as baselines for program plans, status and progress: and provides a basis for resource analysis, exploration of alternatives and cost, performance and schedule tradeoff studies. They should be integrated at all levels, contain sufficient detail and capture key events (e.g. acquisition, Training and training support, Technical Data,Support Equipment (SE) and Packaging, Handling, Storage & Transportation (PHS&T) , logistics, National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and T&E perspectives).

1. Develop a schedule to assess the adequacy of the logistics-related activities and outcomes in addressing Total Life Cycle System Management responsibilities, objectives, and cost impacts. Do all logistics activities provide traceability to the contractor’s Work Breakdown Structure (WBS)?

Program Management Directive (PMD) (AFI 63-101, para 2.2.7)Technology Development / Phase A Concept Development

2. Has a formal program been established and scheduled to identify actions necessary to achieve significant increases in reliability and reductions in the logistics footprint?

3. Has the following LCMP coordination and approval dates been annotated, in the schedule:


a. Local organizations – Competition Advocate, Procuring Contract office, Judge Advocate, Small Business, and appropriate ALC or Logistics Office.


b. ACAT I & II – SAF/AQX, SAF/AQC, SAF/GCQ & AF/ILM coordinated and signed (at a minimum). SAF/ACE & SAF/FMBI will review and coordinate for policy compliance.


c. ACAT III – will follow similar process at the local level. PEO is final approval authority.

AFI 63-101, Operations of Capability Based Acquisition System

4. Has it been identified and scheduled, to address all comments, to the LCMP, that need to be reviewed and deliberated by the IPT prior to forwarding to the MDA for approval?

Operations & Support / Phase D Build & Operations

5. Does the development schedule of the Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) include all offices/stakeholders?

AFPD 63-12, Assurance of Operational Safety, Suitability & Effectiveness

6. 6. Have supportability/logistics considerations been addressed to include the 10 ILS elements including Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS), reclamation, demilitarization and disposal.

AFMCP 63-5, Integration Master Plan and Schedule Guide

a. Initial Capabilities Document/Capability Development document

AFI 36-2251, Management of Air Force Training Systems

b. Acquisition Strategyc. Technology Development strategyd. Acquisition Program Baseline

7. Has the Pre-Initial Operational Capability Supportability Review and Analysis been scheduled?

8. Has the Air Force logistics data systems, maintenance, supply, Technical Data, SE, PHS&T, and logistics training directives been scheduled to support the assurance of operational safety, suitability, and effectiveness for the Air Force systems and end item?

9. Has a schedule been developed for Post Deployment Reviews, periodic assessments of system support strategies vs. expected levels of performance & support?



http://akss.dau.mil/dag/DoD5000.asp?view=framework


http://www.e-publishing.af.mil/shared/media/epubs/AFPD63-12.pdf

http://www.e-publishing.af.mil/shared/media/epubs/AFMCPAM63-5.pdf


EXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:Life-Cycle Logistics (LCL) Tools Professional Logistics Workforce identifiedTotal Life Cycle Systems Management (TLCSM) Performance Based Agreement Performance Based Agreement for Organic Supply SupportDesigning and Assessing Supportability in Weapon SystemsProduct Support: PM Guide to buying performance

10. To increase weapon system availability while reducing life cycle cost & the logistics footprint has the logistics manager scheduled periodic assessments, and where necessary, improvements of the product support strategy?


2.14 Program Established (PMD)



Paragraph 1

Chapter 2

Browse all appendices

Ensure Cost Estimate includes Life Cycle Support Costs

Cost estimates cover the entire life cycle of a system and need to adequately address all of the product support elements, including disposal, to ensure the total life cycle cost is understood and used for management decisions. The logistician needs to make sure that all of the costs for acquiring; fielding, sustaining, and disposal are included. Major categories of cost are Support Equipment, Technical Data, Supply Support, Training & Training Equipment, Depot Activation costs (if organic capability to be established), any Interim Contractor Support or Contractor Logistics Support costs to include Field Service representatives/maintenance activities/inventory management, sustaining engineering costs, depot maintenance, and organizational/intermediate level maintenance.

1. Engage as a team member on the Cost Estimating Team (FM is normally OPR for this task) and engage as a member on the program Integrated Risk Assessment (IRA) Team.

SAF Memo 03A-002, Agile Acquisition Implementation, 4 Feb 03Concept Refinement / Pre KDP-A Concept Studies

2. Ensure all elements of Product Support are included (Support Equipment, Supply Support, Technical Data, Training & Training Equipment, Depot Maintenance, O&I Maintenance, Manpower and personnel, testing costs, disposal costs, transportation costs (including SDT), Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS), demilitarization and disposal, PHS&T, facilities, planned modifications/upgrades, and integration costs if applicable.

3. Coordinate technical data such as RM&A with Engineering. AFI 63-107, Integrated Product Support and Planning AssessmentTechnology Development / Phase A Concept Development

4. Ensure all identified costs above are used for applicable program tasks such as ECP’s/CCP’s, trade studies, SDT budgeting, and new work packages.

Entire document is useful reference on Integrated Product Support.

5. Participate in yearly updates of the Program Office Estimate and IRA activities to reflect any changes in the system data that would reflect in costs changes.


ILA HandbookThe first part of the documents explains the Integrated Logistics Assessment (ILA) process. Use the checklist within your program acquisition phase.


Program Transfer Process Guide Operations & Support / Phase D Build & Operations

Overview document on the program transfer process.

AFMC Guide to the Defense Depot Maintenance Council Cost Comparability Handbook

AFPD 23-5 Reusing and Disposing of Materiel





https://afkm.wpafb.af.mil/ASPs/DocMan/DOCDisplay.asp?Filter=OO-IN-MC-03&DocID=727896

https://afkm.wpafb.af.mil/ASPs/DocMan/DOCDisplay.asp?Filter=OO-AQ-AA-08&DocID=838861

http://www.jdmag.wpafb.af.mil/cchb.pdf


http://www.dla.mil/dlaps/dod/416021m/guide.asp

http://www.dla.mil/dlaps/dod/416021m1/guide.asp

EXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:Approved Integrated Risk Assessment, POE or other cost estimate as described in AFI 63-107.Documentation of the source data for the POE product support elements.

TASK #TASK # PROCESS NAME:PROCESS NAME: ENTRANCE CRITERIA:ENTRANCE CRITERIA:2.15 Prepare Documentation for Milestone A Determination MS A is required



SAMPLE

EXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:Milestone decision approvedAll proper supporting documentation put in the official files

There are two types of decision points: milestone decisions and decision reviews. Each decision point results in a decision to initiate, continue, advance, or terminate a project or program work effort or phase. The review associated with each decision point typically addresses program progress and risk, affordability, program trade-offs, acquisition strategy updates, and the development of exit criteria for the next phase or effort. The Milestone Decision Authority approves the program structure, including the type and number of decision points, as part of the acquisition strategy. Milestone A authorizes entry into the major acquisition process phase for Technology Development. The purpose of this phase is to reduce technology risk and to determine the appropriate set of technologies to be integrated into a full system.

Review and make inputs to applicable documents required by statute or regulation before milestone decision.

Milestone A Documentation Technology Development / Phase A Concept DevelopmentStandard ASC Milestone Decision Process Guide

AFPD 20-1, Logistics Strategic Planning

AFPD 63-1 Capability Based Acquisition System

NSSA Policy 03-01

https://akss.dau.mil/dag/DoD5000.asp?view=framework

https://ace.wpafb.af.mil/common/5-ACQUISITION%20SUPPORT/5-33%20MILESTONE%20SUPPORT/Process%20Guide%20Drafts/ASC%20Standard%20Milestone%20Decision%20Process%20Guide.doc


TASK # PROCESS NAME: ENTRANCE CRITERIA:

Establish a Technical Order Acquisition Program Initial Capabilities Document (ICD)Draft Capability Development Document (CDD)Maintenance StrategyProduct Support Strategy

DESCRIPTION:

CHECKLIST SUBTASKS:

TASK SOURCE DOCUMENTATION PHASE

EXIT CRITERIA:

Updated ICDUpdated Draft CDDUpdated Maintenance StrategyUpdated Product Support StrategyDevelopment of Technical Manual Contract Requirements (TMCR) Document, TM-86-01

2.17.1

Technical order requirements must be planned and placed on contract to ensure completion and delivery concurrent with the equipment or hardware. The organization or individual assigned TO acquisition responsibility is called the Technical Order Manager. This checklist gives instruction on how to initiate a technical order acquisition program from development of the strategy to initial contract award.

1. Establish Technical Order (TO) acquisition program by appointing an experienced technical order manager(s), provide training as needed, and establishing a TO Integrated Program Team.

Establish Technical Order Acquisition ProgramTechnology Development / Phase A Concept Development

2. Determine TO program strategy, objectives and requirements by convening a TO Planning & Requirements Conference. The TO program strategy must address the full life cycle of TOs for acquisition, sustainment, management, distribution, and use.

Appoint TO Manager

3. Develop TO contract requirements that clearly specify technical order requirements, including for delivery. Use latest version of Technical Manual Contract Requirements (TMCR) Document TM 86-01, to place TOs on contract.

TO 00-5-3 Air Force Technical Order Acquisition Procedures

Develop TO strategyTechnical Order Contract Requirements

TO Delivery RequirementsTM 86-01

https://afkm.wpafb.af.mil/ASPs/DocMan/DOCDisplayOnly.asp?Filter=OO-LG-DB&DocID=105414






http://www.pdsm.wpafb.af.mil/toprac/TM-86-01K.1%20(20051201).doc


2.18

Initiate the Depot Source of Repair (DSOR) Process Technology Development Strategy (TDS)Initial Capabilities Document (ICD)Capability Development Document (CDD)Capability Production Document (CPD)Cost Analysis Requirements Document (CARD)Analysis of Alternatives (AOA)Systems Engineering Plan (SEP)Test and Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP)Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP)


CHECKLIST SUBTASKS:CHECKLIST SUBTASKS:TASKTASK SOURCE DOCUMENTATIONSOURCE DOCUMENTATION

All Air Force depot level maintenance posturing decisions are made through the Depot Source of Repair process. Sub-processes include a Strategic Source of Repair (SSOR), a Source of Repair Assignment Process (SORAP), and a Depot Maintenance Interservicing (DMI) process. The SSOR and SORAP processes determine the best long-term depot maintenance source of repair (SOR) for Air Force workloads while giving full consideration to the requirements of public law, Air Force policy, and which maximize weapon system sustainment to the warfighter with minimum use of scarce USAF resources. Air Force Instruction (AFI) 63-107, Integrated Product Support Planning and Assessment, defines how a product support strategy integrates acquisition and sustainment throughout the weapon system’s life cycle. The DMI process determines the final SOR location with consideration to all DoD Services. The Logistician will use the Depot Source of Repair Electronic Management (DSOR-EM) tool to complete and track the DSOR process. A Weapon System may require multiple DSORs depending on complexity.

1. Logistician decides if DSOR required using AFI 63-107

AFI 63-101, Operations of Capabilities Based Acquisition System

a. Identify and define requirements AFI 63-107, Integrated Product Support Planning and Assessment, Para 4.3.1b. Develop memo to HQ AFMC/A4D requesting Core determination and Candidate Depot

c. Provide Phase 1 data using appropriate template format1)Template A – New Start2)Template B – Modification LCMP Guide3)Template C – Workload Shift

d. Decide if Commercial Statement is required. If no, proceed to HQ AFMC/A4D with request. If yes, seek Commercial Statement documentation (requires PK/JAG signature) and provide this with request to HQ AFMC/A4D.

JG-DM Form 27

e. The Logistician will track status through DSOR-EM Tool throughout the remainder of the DSOR Process.

JG-DM Form 282. Once HQ AFMC provides Candidate Depot and Core Assessment the Logistician will establish DSOR Team to initiate the SORAP (Reference DSOR CoP).

a. Members include OEM, candidate depot, sustainment manager and other key stakeholders as appropriate

JG-DM Form 44

b. Team stays formed throughout acquisition to activation (changes into Depot Maintenance Activation Working Group (DMAWG))










EXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:Completed SSOR (Task 1)Candidate Depot / Core Assessment Request (Task 1)DSOR Team (Task 2)Update to LCMP (Task 3)Completed CBA (Task 4)Signed SORAP (Task 5)DMI Decision Memo (Task 6)Depot Maintenance Implementation Plan (Task 7)

Depot Source of Repair (DSOR) Community of Practice (CoP)

3. DSOR Team evaluates workloada. Determine system support impactsb. Understanding of depot repair requirementsc. Determine if and what additional data is required AFI 65-508 Cost Analysis Guidance and Procedures

d. Validate/correct candidate depot assignmentse. Is candidate depot “interested” in your depot workload?f. Will costing effort be required?g. Is data available from actual system?h. Is data available from “like” systems?i. Gather SORAP Template data as appropriate j. Define depot maintenance and acquisition strategyk. Develop Partnering strategy with stakeholders/ depotsl. Update acquisition strategy plan & Life Cycle Management Plan with partnering strategy (AFI 63-107 Para 4.3.1)

4. Conduct Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA) for depot workloadsa. Validate organic / contractor estimates

b. Partnering may be an option 5. Draft SORAP Template to include recommendation / cost estimate

Depot Maintenance Implementation Plan Examples

a. Coordinate with all stakeholders and obtain consensus with SOR recommendation

b. Ensure appropriate template is filled inc. Prepare transmittal memo to HQ AFMC/A4Dd. HQ AFMC/A4D will provide 50/50 assessment and HQ AFMC/A4 concurrence

6. Initiate Depot Maintenance Interservicing (DMI) 30 days after receipt of HQ AFMC/A4 concurrence


a. Fill out JG-DM Forms 27, 28 and 44 See checklists D-2, D-9, D-10, D-11, E-1, F-1b. Prepare cover letter and submit to HQ AFMC/A4D

7. Develop a Depot Maintenance Implementation Plan and submit to HQ AFMC/A4D

https://afkm.wpafb.af.mil/ASPs/CoP/OpenCoP.asp?Filter=OO-LG-MC-10



ENTRANCE CRITERIA:ENTRANCE CRITERIA:Technology Development Strategy (TDS)Initial Capabilities Document (ICD)Capability Development Document (CDD)Capability Production Document (CPD)Cost Analysis Requirements Document (CARD)Analysis of Alternatives (AOA)Systems Engineering Plan (SEP)Test and Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP)Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP)


CHECKLIST SUBTASKS:CHECKLIST SUBTASKS:PHASEPHASE

All Air Force depot level maintenance posturing decisions are made through the Depot Source of Repair process. Sub-processes include a Strategic Source of Repair (SSOR), a Source of Repair Assignment Process (SORAP), and a Depot Maintenance Interservicing (DMI) process. The SSOR and SORAP processes determine the best long-term depot maintenance source of repair (SOR) for Air Force workloads while giving full consideration to the requirements of public law, Air Force policy, and which maximize weapon system sustainment to the warfighter with minimum use of scarce USAF resources. Air Force Instruction (AFI) 63-107, Integrated Product Support Planning and Assessment, defines how a product support strategy integrates acquisition and sustainment throughout the weapon system’s life cycle. The DMI process determines the final SOR location with consideration to all DoD Services. The Logistician will use the Depot Source of Repair Electronic Management (DSOR-EM) tool to complete and track the DSOR process. A Weapon System may require multiple

Technology Development / Phase A Concept Development


Production and Deployment / Phase B Preliminary Design/Phase C Complete Design & Operations & Support / Phase D Build & Operations

EXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:Completed SSOR (Task 1)Candidate Depot / Core Assessment Request (Task 1)DSOR Team (Task 2)Update to LCMP (Task 3)Completed CBA (Task 4)Signed SORAP (Task 5)DMI Decision Memo (Task 6)Depot Maintenance Implementation Plan (Task 7)



CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK :TASK : SOURCE DOCUMENTATION SOURCE DOCUMENTATION PHASEPHASE

(Chap. 2, para 2.2)

(Chap. 1)

(Chap 5, para 5.7)

See Checklists D-3, D-9

EXIT CRITERIA: EXIT CRITERIA: Depot activation planMinutes of DMAWG Final SORAP CompleteWhen all identified activations have taken place.

2.20

Establish Depot Maintenance Activation Working Group (DMAWG) Team

Identification of new acquisitions with depot repair capabilities

Initial SORAP identifying organic with a mission assignment

The objective of the DMAWG is to ensure a required depot maintenance capability is set up in a timely and efficient manner to achieve government-controlled capabilities for the depot repair. The DMAWG is the forum for conducting depot maintenance activation planning to ensure funding, contracting, and delivery of data is accomplished. If support concept is total Contractor Logistics Support (CLS), a DMAWG is not required; however a Contractor Depot Activation Plan is still required.

1. A logistics support plan which defines contractor support and government activities is developed. Be sure to include Support Equipment (SE) and Packaging, Handling, Storage & Transportation (PHS&T).

DOD 5000.2 Operation of the Defense Acquisition SystemSystem Development & Demonstration

2. System Program Manager appoints a Logistician as DMAWG chair AFI 21-102 Depot Maintenance Management

3. DMAWG chair calls for membership with the assigned depot (No later than 30 days after Preliminary Design Review and prior to Milestone C)

4. Develop a DMAWG charter AFMCI 21-101 Depot Maintenance Activation Planning (DMAP)

5. Review and ensure depot support requirements are adequately described

6. Identify participating DMAWG organizations (Maintenance Activation Planning Team)

AFI 63-107 Operation of Capabilities Based Acquisition System

7. Develop, coordinate and maintain depot activation plans

8. Determine depot activation requirements (facilities, training and training systems, SE, PHS&T, manpower and personnel)

9. Assist in developing funding requirements for depot support Independent Logistics Assessment (ILA) Handbook

10. Maintain depot activation schedules11. Conduct DMAWGs and coordinate activation activities AFH 32-1084 Facility Requirements12. Ensure contractor has capability to support interim logistics support until transfer to organic repair.

http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/500002p.pdf


http://www.e-publishing.af.mil/shared/media/epubs/AFMCI21-101.pdf


http://www.e-publishing.af.mil/shared/media/epubs/AFH32-1084.pdf


2.24 Facilities Concept Checklist Milestone A ApprovalInitial Capabilities Development



Identifying and tracking facilities begins early during the operational site reviews when a mission beddown, realignment, transfer, conversion, activation/inactivation, or operational change begins with a site survey tasking for a particular program. The tasking is assessed and assigned to a MAJCOM Installations & Units Action Officer. The action officer reviews the tasking with the program manager and discusses an implementation strategy, to include possibilities of a site survey, a MAJCOM programming plan (PPLAN), environmental concerns and issues, and possible Site Activation Task Force meetings. The action officer acts as the focal point for the PPLAN process and serves as the site survey team chief. A site survey is defined as an authorized visit to survey real property, i.e., facilities and land, to determine its feasibility for unit or mission beddown. The following are some general guidelines for preparing for a site survey. The timelines can vary depending on the urgency of the action and the proposed effective date.

The Logistician should review and make input to any supportability documents required by statute or regulation before Milestone Decision can be sought and rendered. Facilities summaries are especially relevant during Phase I because of the long lead-time normally required for establishing or modifying facilities. These summaries can be used to identify necessary facility requirements such as test equipment, training aids, building size and any other special considerations. The Logistician should perform analysis to define necessary facilities or facility improvements, review and make input to key documents required by statute or regulation before Milestone Decision can be sought and rendered.

1. Provide inputs to MAJCOM in determining proposed beddown date, aircraft delivery schedule, aircraft numbers (PAA/BAI), manpower and personnel impacts, mission unique requirements, and impacts on base operating support.

AFI 10-503 Base Unit Beddown ProgramTechnology Development / Phase A Concept Development

2. Coordinate on site survey objectives, proposed actions, and facility requirements with MAJCOM. Provide beddown recommendations based on potential beddown sites and facility options.


3. Participate in site survey, as required. Section 6.1.1, 5.e & 8 Section 7.3.1


– Attend site survey team in-brief to Wing Commander, staff, and base-level functional managers on the purpose of the visit.

– The MAJCOM site survey team will be briefed on potential beddown sites and facility options.


– In most cases, the team is taken on a tour of applicable base facilities.

– The team will breakout into working groups and the logistician will support the logistics activity; attend afternoon integration meetings; participate in outbrief preparation, and assist in the development of site survey report.

MIL-STD-3007 DoD Index of Specifications & Standards

– At the conclusion of the site survey the Site Survey Team Chief will send out an e-mail advising everyone that the final site survey report is available (usually posted on a web site).

4. In some cases, MAJCOM may request support to develop and publish their PPLAN for beddown action. The PPLAN describes the program, outlines the milestones, and identifies the associated tasks. It also forms the basis for a future Site Action Task Force. See SATAF site activation operating instructions.

AFI 32-1024 Standard Facility Requirements

5. Some logistics site survey activities to address:

– Begin analysis comparing existing allocated space at test, depot, training and operational locations to determine specific facilities requirements to support the system.

AFPD 10-5 Basing

– Verify maintenance and storage facilities options (contractor or organic, another Service, etc.)


https://afkm.wpafb.af.mil/ASPs/DocMan/DOCDisplay.asp?Filter=DE&DocID=1713516

http://dodssp.daps.dla.mil/dodiss/15dec_06.pdf



See Checklist D-9

EXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:Site Survey ReportPPLANPOM InputsAll proper supporting documentation put in the official files

– Determine if existing facilities can be used and if new or modified support facilities are required.

AFI 10-501 Program Action Directives (PAD) and Programming Plans (PPLAN)

– Ensure Energy Efficiency, and Alternate Fuels considerations are addressed

– Verify environmental compliance, pollution prevention and recovery or disposal considerations in the facilities consideration.

– Determine communication requirements including access and connectivity.

6. For program requirements the logistician should begin development of programming documents (Program Objective Memorandum) to incorporate MAJCOM Military Construction Program funding for the appropriate fiscal year. The logistician should also incorporate continuous facilities upgrades in the RFP.

AFI 32-1032 Planning and ProgrammingAppropriated FundedMaintenance, Repair, and Construction Projects

– Do the facilities meet peacetime and wartime objectives? Are deployed facilities required? Review applicable operational effectiveness analyses for basing considerations

– Do you have organic depot repair cost estimates to support depot repair?

AFI 32-9004 Disposal of Real Property

– Do you have contractor depot repair cost estimates to support deport repair?

– Is there special facility requirements needed for system software sustainability?


– What is the status of facilities design planning?– What risks have been identified and what are the mitigation plans?

– Have environmental compliance, pollution prevention and recovery or disposal considerations been updated from concept refinement for the facility?

– If the deployment of a weapon system is an overseas location it may require the host nation acquire land and provide infrastructure support (power, water, communications, etc.) and/or facility support (construction of facilities to support installation of the system).

– Identify requirements for an RF site survey to fully understand the behavior of radio waves within a facility before installing wireless network access points






TASK #TASK # PROCESS NAME:PROCESS NAME:Determine Manpower & Personnel Requirements


CHECKLIST SUBTASKS:CHECKLIST SUBTASKS:TASKTASK

Manpower high drivers include:

2.24.1

The logistician must ensure through contact with the MAJCOM, Product Centers and Air Logistics Centers that manpower and personnel considerations are appropriately documented. Personnel refers to the specific knowledge skills and abilities of the individual.

Manpower: A critical resource that supports an approved program. It is not a program by itself and should not be manipulated separately from the program it supports.

Manpower Requirement - A statement of manpower needed to accomplish a job, workload, mission, or program. There are two types of manpower requirements: funded and unfunded. Funded manpower requirements are those that have been validated and allocated. Unfunded requirements are validated manpower needs but deferred because of budgetary constraints.

1. Participate in requirements discussions related to operators, maintainers or support personnel; interpret the User’s needs and requirements (including Manpower and personnel implications, constraints, and issues) and develop strategy for addressing.

2. Participate in activities that address Manpower, personnel, training, human factors engineering, environmental, safety, occupational health, health hazards, habitability, supportability or any other Integrated Logistics Support (ILS) element or related areas (such as maintenance concept, organizational structure, knowledge, skills and abilities (KSAs), or cognitive requirements) and provides guidance on accommodating Manpower into the design, or identify the effects the design will have on the operator or maintainer.

· Tasks that require high frequency man- hour/manpower

· Tasks that are labor intensive

· Tasks that require multiple persons to perform

EXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:Inputs into Analysis of Alternatives (AoAs)

· Weapon system designs and organizational designs that increase manpower requirements

3. Assure Manpower and personnel requirements are clearly reflected in the system functional baseline and that they are feasible and testable/verifiable.

4. Assure reliability, maintainability; design analysis, Engineering Change Proposals (ECPs) and trade studies reflect any impact on Manpower and personnel issues.

5. Assure Manpower and personnel considerations are included in acquisition documentation.

6. The Manpower Estimate Report (MER) which is required by 10 U.S.C. Section 2434 for all Major Defense Acquisitions Programs (MDAP), ACAT I, is prepared by the DoD Component’s operating command with inputs from the implementing, supporting and participating commands manpower authority, or its designee, in support of Milestones B, C and Full-Rate Production (FRP). ACAT II and below programs are not required

7. Manpower and personnel issues and concerns:· Is there a legacy system to use as a manpower and personnel baseline?

· Do the manpower levels need to be constrained to the same level as the predecessor system?

· Will the manpower mix (military, civilian, contractors) change significantly?

· Is there a mandate to optimize or reduce manpower authorizations?

· Have manpower authorizations been justified and/or modified to meet mission need?

· Will an increase in end-strength be required?· What are the end-strength offsets?· Approximately how many authorizations will it take to operate, maintain, train and support the full capability? (Full capability includes all operational and maintenance (local and remote) components.)

· What manpower estimate was used for the affordability assessment?

· How does the manpower estimate compare to current requirement and authorizations?

· How much could manpower grow before it would impact the affordability decision?

· If the manpower estimate is greater than authorizations, what is the resource sponsor’s position regarding funding?

· Once manpower and personnel requirements are identified, ensure the program inputs them to the POM.

Input into Systems Engineering Plan (SEP)Input into Maintenance ConceptInputs into Training Plans Inputs into Test and Evaluations Master Plans (TEMP)Input into Initial Capabilities Document (ICD)Input into Capabilities Development Document (CDD)Inputs into Production Capability Document (PCD)Input into Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP)Input into Manpower Estimate Report (MER)Input into Life Cycle Cost (LCC) EstimatesInput to the Program Objective Memorandum (POM)Participate in SACOM Interview


ENTRANCE CRITERIA:ENTRANCE CRITERIA:Target Audience Description (TAD)Draft Maintenance ConceptCost Analysis Requirements Description (CARD)Initial Capability Document (ICD)Capability Development Document (CDD)Capability Production Document (CPD)

Analysis of Alternatives AoA’sSystems Engineering Plan (SEP)



(Pre-Milestone A)


MAJCOM, Product Centers and Air Logistics Centers that manpower and personnel considerations are appropriately documented. Personnel refers to the specific knowledge skills and abilities of the

Manpower: A critical resource that supports an approved program. It is not a program by itself and should not be manipulated

Manpower Requirement - A statement of manpower needed to accomplish a job, workload, mission, or program. There are two types of manpower requirements: funded and unfunded. Funded manpower requirements are those that have been validated and allocated. Unfunded requirements are validated manpower needs but deferred because of budgetary

SOURCE SOURCE DOCUMENTATIONDOCUMENTATIONCJCS 3170.01 Joint Capability Integration and Development System (JCIDS) Concept Refinement /

Pre KDP-A Concept Studies

AFI 10-601,Capabilities-Based Requirements Development




Understand paragraph 1-2, and use appropriate attachments that apply to your program.




(See Enclosure 3 & 7)

Target Audience Description

EXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:Inputs into Analysis of Alternatives (AoAs)

Systems Engineering Plan, para 3.4.3

Defense Acquisition Guidebook (See Chapters 3 “Affordability and Life-Cycle Resource Estimates”, 4 “Systems Engineering”, 5 “Life-Cycle Logistics”, and 6 “Human Systems Integration”

10 U.S.C. Section 2434

AFI 38-201, Determining Manpower Requirements

DODI 5000.2


See Chapter 3, but scan entire document for further information




http://www.acq.osd.mil/se/publications/pig/sep_prepguide_v1_2.pdf

https://akss.dau.mil/dag/DoD5000.asp?view=document

http://straylight.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode10/usc_sec_10_00002434----000-.html




Input into Systems Engineering Plan (SEP)Input into Maintenance ConceptInputs into Training Plans Inputs into Test and Evaluations Master Plans (TEMP)Input into Initial Capabilities Document (ICD)Input into Capabilities Development Document (CDD)Inputs into Production Capability Document (PCD)Input into Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP)Input into Manpower Estimate Report (MER)Input into Life Cycle Cost (LCC) EstimatesInput to the Program Objective Memorandum (POM)Participate in SACOM Interview





EXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:Funding provided to accomplish MILCON project constructionInputs to Program Objective Memorandum (POM) for minor construction

2.24A

Define and Implement Military Construction (MILCON) Requirements

This checklist is intended to define, review and implement requirements for any new or modified facilities and associated facilities equipment for purposes of supporting the Military Construction (MILCON) process. MILCON is 3300 funding.

1. Determination of facility requirements begins with site survey. Participants should include, but are not limited to Program Office, Lead Command, Using Command, and base-level user

2. Following the site survey, the base-level user develops the MILCON package, i.e. AF Form 332, Environmental Assessment, Economic Assessment, etc. Final package is forwarded to the Using or Lead Command on DD Form 1391. Ensure depot facilities are included

3. The logistician should contact the using command, lead command, and depot to ensure the facilities process is on track4. Using or Lead Command identifies and POMs for MILCON funding to support fielding of the system through HQ AF

5. HQ AF approves, disapproves, defers funding and provides MILCON funding back to the Using or Lead Command.

6. Program Office provides POM inputs to Using or Lead Command for MILCON process

NOTE: For minor construction projects (less than $750K) coordinate with Using or Lead Command to ensure facilities are available to support bed down of the system. If minor construction project of 750K or less, 3400 dollars are used


ENTRANCE CRITERIA:ENTRANCE CRITERIA:Concept of Operations (CONOPS)Initial Capabilities Document (ICD)Capability Development Document (CDD)Expectation Management Agreement (EMA)Site Survey



EXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:Funding provided to accomplish MILCON project constructionInputs to Program Objective Memorandum (POM) for minor construction

This checklist is intended to define, review and implement requirements for any new or modified facilities and associated facilities equipment for purposes of supporting the Military Construction (MILCON) process. MILCON is 3300 funding.

DODI 5000.2 Operation of the Defense Acquisition SystemSystem Development & Demonstration

AFI 32-1021 Planning and Programming Military Construction (MILCON) ProjectsProduction and Deployment / Phase B Preliminary Design/Phase C Complete Design & Build Approval

AF Form 332

AF Form 813

DD Form 1391

SAMPLE MILCON DOCUMENTS:

MILCON Process Bullet Background Paper

Sample MILCON Questionnaire

Sample 1391 (F-22)

Sample D3 document (F-22)

Sample Certificate of Compliance (F-22)

Sample Executive Summary (F-22)



http://www.e-publishing.af.mil/shared/media/epubs/af332.xfd

http://www.e-publishing.af.mil/shared/media/epubs/af813.xfd

http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/infomgt/forms/forminfo/forminfopage2125.html

https://afkm.wpafb.af.mil/ASPs/DocMan/Process/ProcessDOCFunctions.asp?DocID=2931874&Function=ViewDocument&FolderID=OO-LG-MC-37-38-5&Filter=OO-LG-MC-37







TASK #TASK # PROCESS NAME:PROCESS NAME:Address Human Systems Integration (HSI)



Operator ergonomics (reach, weight, height, comfort)

Impacts of heat and vibration on human operators

Occupational health (noise, radiation, chemical, etc)

2.29.2

Human Systems Integration (HSI) is a process to ensure systems are designed and developed that effectively and affordably integrate with human capabilities and limitations. A good HSI process considers human factors engineering, manpower, personnel, training, and environmental, safety, and occupational health (ESOH) aspects along with survivability, habitability throughout system design, development, fielding, and sustainment. The aim of this checklist is to ensure the consideration of HSI early and throughout the acquisition process in order to maximize system capability while minimizing life cycle costs and the logistics footprint.

1. Participate in requirements discussions related to operators, maintainers or support personnel; interpret the User’s needs and requirements and develop strategy for addressing HSI.

2. Participate in activities that address HSI and provide guidance on the effects the design will have relating to HSI.

3. Assure reliability, maintainability; design analysis, test program, Engineering Change Proposals (ECPs) and trade studies reflect any impact on HSI issues.

4. Assure HSI considerations are included in acquisition documentation (see definition above). Examples:

Operator machine interface (maximum G-forces, potential electrical effects on operator, displays conform to optimum visual ability, etc)

Environmental impact on operators and maintainers (arctic, desert, Chemical, Biological, Nuclear and Explosives, etc)

Operator and maintainer personal and protective equipment (helmet, face shield, gloves, etc)

Materials such as hydrazine, halon, and radioactive material

EXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:Inputs into Analysis of Alternatives (AoAs)Input into Systems Engineering Plan (SEP)nput into Maintenance ConceptInputs into Training Plans Inputs into Test and Evaluations Master Plans (TEMP)Input into Initial Capabilities Document (ICD)Input into Capabilities Development Document (CDD)Inputs into Production Capability Document (PCD)Input into Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP)Input into Life Cycle Cost (LCC) Estimates

5. Ensure the systems engineering process includes HSI considerations and are addressed at each engineering review (SRR, PDR, CDR, etc). Examples of considerations:

Survivability of operators and maintainers (ejection seats, armor, etc)

Human operator and maintainer limitations (sleep, food, and water requirements)


ENTRANCE CRITERIA:ENTRANCE CRITERIA:Draft Maintenance ConceptInitial Capability Document (ICD)Capability Development Document (CDD)Capability Production Document (CPD)Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP)Analysis of Alternatives (AoA)Systems Engineering Plan (SEP)



(Pre-Milestone A)

(See Enclosure 3 & 7)

Human Systems Integration (HSI) is a process to ensure systems are designed and developed that effectively and affordably integrate with human capabilities and limitations. A good HSI process considers human factors engineering, manpower, personnel, training, and environmental, safety, and occupational health (ESOH) aspects along with survivability, habitability throughout system design, development, fielding, and sustainment. The aim of this checklist is to ensure the consideration of HSI early and throughout the acquisition process in order to maximize system capability while minimizing life cycle costs and

CJCS 3170.01 Joint Capability Integration and Development System (JCIDS) Concept Refinement / Pre KDP-A Concept Studies

AFI 10-601,Capabilities-Based Requirements Development


AFI 10-602, Determining Mission Capability and Supportability RequirementsTechnology Development / Phase A Concept DevelopmentUnderstand paragraph 1-2, and

use appropriate attachments that apply to your program.

Systems Engineering Plan, para 3.4.3


(See Chapters 3 “Affordability and Life-Cycle Resource Estimates”, 4 “Systems Engineering”, 5 “Life-Cycle Logistics”, and 6 “Human Systems Integration”


DODI 5000.2 Operation of the Defense Acquisition System






http://www.acq.osd.mil/se/publications/pig/sep_prepguide_v1_2.pdf




EXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:Inputs into Analysis of Alternatives (AoAs)Input into Systems Engineering Plan (SEP)nput into Maintenance ConceptInputs into Training Plans Inputs into Test and Evaluations Master Plans (TEMP)Input into Initial Capabilities Document (ICD)Input into Capabilities Development Document (CDD)Inputs into Production Capability Document (PCD)Input into Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP)Input into Life Cycle Cost (LCC) Estimates

See Chapter 3, but scan entire document for further information


TASK #TASK # PROCESS NAME:PROCESS NAME: ENTRANCE CRITERIA:ENTRANCE CRITERIA:Refine Supportability Objectives Capability Development Document (CDD)

Key Performance Parameters (KPPs)Developed Product Support Capabilities



2. Analyze Operational Capabilities & Environmental Constraints See Chapter 11.1

4. Review ICD and draft CDD

5. Review Test & Evaluation Test Strategy

8. Refine Component Concepts

2.30

The objective of most support system design activities is to identify support considerations (e.g., constraints) which may influence selection. The logistician should address all supportability analysis needed to analyze, define, and verify the supportability thresholds and objectives for a system and to assess the risks in accomplishing them. Early in the process, the issue of tradeoffs must be raised during the analysis of proposed concepts. Careful use of tradeoff studies will guide the logisticians in finding the optimal design—one which balances design objectives with supportability requirements. The supportability analysis is an analytical tool, conducted as part of the systems engineering process to determine the most cost-effectively support for the system over its entire life cycle. It provides the basis for related design requirements that may be included in specifications.

1. Ensure a logistician is involved on the team that develops the Systems Engineering Plan

CJCS 3170.01 Joint Capability Integration and Development System (JCIDS) Technology Development / Phase A Concept Development

3. Refine Concept Performance (& Constraints) Definition & Verification Objectives


AFI 99-103, Capabilities Based Test and Evaluation

6. Review Support and Maintenance Concepts for all 10 ILS elements. Specifically for Support Equipment , minimize peculiar support equipment.


7. Decompose Concept Functional Definition into Component Concepts & Assessment Objectives

Entire document provides a general understanding on JCIDS.


Entire document is useful reference on Integrated Product Support


Good reference document for programs with Contractor Support strategy.




Understand 1-2 and use appropriate attachments that apply to your program.











See Checklist D-3EXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:Updated Systems Engineering Plan (SEP)Updated System Support and Maintenance ConceptsUpdated Acquisition PlanDeveloped Initial Product Support Strategy









EXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:

2.30.1CONSIDER APPLICATION OF MODELING AND SIMULATION TOOLS

SOURCE SOURCE DOCUMENTATIONDOCUMENTATION


ENTRANCE CRITERIA:ENTRANCE CRITERIA:





1.12

Initial Capabilities Document (ICD)Draft Capability Development Document (CDD)Draft Capability Production Document (CPD)Acquisition Program Baseline (APB) Test and Evaluation StrategySystem Engineering Plan (SEP)



(Para 3.7.2.3)

(enclosure A & B)

(Chapter 5, para 5.5)

(Chapter 2, para 2.4)

Para 6.5, Sustainment Integration

EXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:Input into Draft Capability Development Document (CDD)Input into Draft Capability Production Document (CPD) Input into Acquisition Program Baseline (APB)Input into Test and Evaluation StrategyInput into System Engineering Plan (SEP)

Develop Supportability Key Performance Parameters (KPP’s)

Key Performance Parameters (KPPs): Those attributes or characteristics of a system that are considered critical or essential to the development of an effective military capability and those attributes that make a significant contribution to the key characteristics as defined in the Joint Operations Concepts (JOpsC) during an increment. KPPs are validated by the Joint Requirements Oversight Council (JROC) for JROC interest items, and by the DOD component for Joint Integration or Independent documents. Capability development and capability production documents are included verbatim in the APB.

1. Coordinate with requirements authority regarding supportability requirements

DoD 5000.2 Operation of the Defense Acquisition SystemTechnology Development / Phase A Concept Development

2. Ensure KPP’s address system supportability issues such as maintenance man-hours per flying hour and deployment footprint. (i.e. consideration of Support Equipment) Mandatory KPP/KSAs are required per OSD memo (see references)

3. Are support related performance and acceptance criteria developed to be demonstrated during planned testing?

CJCS 3170.01 Joint Capability Integration and Development System (JCIDS)

4. Ensure Supportability KPP’s linked through the capabilities defined in the ICD to the key characteristics from the JOpsC.

5. Ensure Supportability KPP’s in the CDD and CPD are inserted verbatim into the APB


AFI 63-101Operation of Capability Based Acquisition System


Mandatory KPP / KSAs -Jack Bell Memo

AF/A5R Policy Memo 14 Dec 07


See checklists D-1, D-3, D-7, D-12, F-1






https://afkm.wpafb.af.mil/asps/DocMan/Process/ProcessDOCFunctions.asp?DocID=2548479&Function=ViewDocument&FolderID=OO-LG-MC-37-38-5&Filter=OO-LG-MC-37



TASK #TASK # PROCESS NAME:PROCESS NAME: ENTRANCE CRITERIA:ENTRANCE CRITERIA:Analysis of Alternatives (AOA)Initial Capabilities Document (ICD)Capability Development Document (CDD)



Facility Requirements

EXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:Computer Resources Life Cycle Management Plan (CRLCMP)Budget InputsSupport elements developed, produced and deliveredRevise Course of Action as appropriate

2.32AParticipate in the Computer Resources Working Group (CRWG) or the Computer Resources Integrated Product Team (CR-IPT)

Computer Resources Support encompasses the facilities, hardware, software, documentation, manpower, and personnel needed to operate and support mission critical computer hardware/software systems. As the primary end item, support equipment, and training devices increase in complexity, more and more software is being used. The expense associated with the design and maintenance of software programs is so high that one cannot afford not to manage this process effectively. It is standard practice to establish some form of computer resource working group to accomplish the necessary planning and management of computer resources support. The CRWG or CR-IPT is led by the Program Manager and should include: Logisticians, Software Engineers, Financial Management Personnel, Configuration Managers, Data Managers, Contracting Officer, System Engineer, Logistics Center Representative and Operating Command representative.

1. Contact CRWG Chair for participation and membership. CRLCMP Format Technology Development / Phase A Concept Development

2. Provide logistics input to the Computer Resources Life Cycle Management Plan (CRLCMP) and review for supportability considerations and impacts.

AFR 800-14 - Rescinded (Best Practice)

3. Provide input for changes to appropriate system documentation to include the Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP).

AFMC 800-21 - Rescinded (Best Practice)System Development & Demonstration

4. Initiate actions to ensure supportability considerations are implemented as required.

Production and Deployment / Phase B Preliminary Design/Phase C Complete Design &

5. Ensure facilities and MILCON funding including facility modifications requirements are addressed lead time away as applicable. AFH 32-1084


https://afkm.wpafb.af.mil/ASPs/DocMan/DOCDisplayOnly.asp?Filter=OO-EN-DB&DocID=630882





2.33 Program Established (PMD)



(See Enclosure 7)

Paragraph 1

Chapter 2

Browse all appendicesEXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:Approved IRA, POE, ICE, CCA, other cost estimates that includes product support as described in AFI 63-107

Include Supportability Requirements in the CARD, POE, CCA, ICE, Affordability Assessments

The acronyms above stand for Cost Analysis Requirements Document (CARD), Program Office Estimate (POE), Component Cost Analysis (CCA), and Independent Cost Estimate (ICE). Affordability assessments are done at Air Force level only. Cost estimates cover the entire life cycle of a system and need to adequately address all of the Product Support elements, including disposal, to ensure the total life cycle cost is understood and used for management decisions. The logistician needs to make sure that all of the costs for acquiring; fielding, sustaining, and disposal are included. Major categories of cost are support equipment, technical data, supply support, training & training equipment, depot activation costs (if organic capability to be established), any Interim Contractor Support or Contractor Logistics Support costs to include field service representatives/maintenance activities/inventory management, sustaining engineering costs, depot maintenance, manpower and personnel, and organizational/intermediate level maintenance.

1. Engage as a team member on the Cost Estimating Team (for CARD, POE, CCA, ICE, (FM is normally OPR for this task), and engage as a member on the program Integrated Risk Assessment (IRA) Team.

AFI 63-107, Integrated Product Support and Planning AssessmentConcept Refinement / Pre KDP-A Concept Studies

2. Ensure all elements of Product Support are included (Support Equipment, Packaging, Handling, Storage & Transportation, Supply Support, Technical Data, technical Orders, Training & Training Equipment, Depot Maintenance, O&I Maintenance, Manpower and Personnel, testing costs, disposal costs, transportation costs (including Second Destination Transportation), Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages, facilities, planned modifications/upgrades, Human Systems Integration (HSI) and integration costs if applicable. Specifically address Energy Efficiency and Alternate Fuels considerations. Include any costs for demilitarization, declassification and disposal.



3. Coordinate technical data such as RM&A with Engineering.4. Ensure consistent use of data for other applicable program tasks such as engineering change proposals/contractor change proposals, trade studies, SDT budgeting, and new work packages.


5. Participate in yearly (or as required) updates of the CARD, POE, CCA, ICE, and IRA activities to reflect any changes in the system data that would reflect in costs changes.

(See Chapters 2 “ Defense Acquisition Program Goals and Strategy”, 4 “Systems Engineering” and 6 “Human Systems Integration”


DoD 5000.2 Operation of the Defense Acquisition SystemProduction and Deployment / Phase B Preliminary Design/Phase C Complete Design &

AFMC Guide to the Defense Depot Maintenance Council Cost Comparability HandbookOperations & Support / Phase D Build & Operations











Source data documentation for appropriate estimate product support elements


2.35

Initial Capabilities Plan (ICD)Draft Capability Development Document (CDD)Support & Maintenance concept & TechnologiesIn SDD Phase: Capability Production DocumentLife Cycle Mgmt Plan (LCMP)



(Chap. 8, para 8.3)

EXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:Updated Initial Capability Document (ICD)Updated CDDUpdated Life Cycle Mgmt Plan (LCMP)Updated Draft Capability Development Document (CDD)

Include Supportability in the Acquisition Program Baseline (APB)

The Acquisition Program Baseline (APB) defines the cost, schedule, benefits, and performance baselines for the acquisition program, should begin during the time the design requirement of the customer are created. It is the mutual agreement between the provider organization, and the user organization concerning the capability and benefits the program will provide and the cost and schedule authorized for the program. The APB also establishes performance metrics for assessing program success and advancing it through the acquisition lifecycle. For Baseline Development and Fielding & Operations activities, SDIPTs will develop APBs that specify the end state goals for cost, schedule and performance goals for the overall program and for each increment. APBs shall document the results of the planning process. All APBs for the next increment to be executed will be approved by the Milestone Decision Authority (MDA). Planning APBs for out year increments will be submitted to the MDA but do not require approval.

All incremental APBs should be submitted with the SDIP for each increment. The overall program APB will a) document which increment(s) will satisfy which KPPs, b) specify the minimum performance parameters, including KPPs that define the core capability and c) target which increment will provide the core capability.

1. Review KPPs (e.g. Performance, availability, persistence) Defense Acquisition Guidebook 2.1.1.1Technology Development / Phase A Concept Development

2. Provide input to the Expectation Management Agreement (EMA)

3. Coordinate with applicable MAJCOM office for requirements (e.g. DR)


4. Calculate Logistics Support portions of Total Ownership Cost (TOC) of the program. (i.e. all costs associated with the research, development, procurement, operation, logistical support, and disposal of an individual weapon system or piece of equipment over its total life cycle; and associated common support items).

5. Ensure the contractor, as a contract deliverable, demonstrates by testing that they have achieved certain supportability/sustainability targets.



See Checklists D-2, D-3, D-4, D-6, D-9, D-12, E-1, F-1

Established performance metrics for assessing program success throughout the acquisition lifecycle that ensure supportability criteria is included in the APB and KPP’s (i.e. mean time between failure (MTBF), maintenance cycle time, footprint reduction, supply change management).

http://akss.dau.mil/dag/DoD5000.asp?view=document&rf=GuideBook%5CIG_c2.1.1.1.asp




2.36

Acquisition StrategyStrategic Planning Guidance Joint Programming Guidance Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) PlanSupportability Concept & RequirementsSource of Repair AssignmentsDepot Maintenance PlanProduct Support Plan



Paragraph 1.2

Include Supportability Requirements in the Program Objectives Memorandum (POM) submission

The POM is a major document in the Planning, Programming, Budgeting and Execution (PPBE) process, and the basis for the component budget estimates. The POM is the principal programming document that details how a component proposes to respond to assignments I the Strategic Planning Guidance (SPG) and Joint Programming Guidance (JPG) and satisfy its assigned functions over the Future Years Defense Program (FYDP).

1. Logistician should coordinate with the Program Manager (PM) and Financial Manager (FM) for POM inputs

PPBE Process Concept Refinement / Pre KDP-A Concept Studies2. Analyze Acquisition Strategy

3. Interpret Program Supportability needs Technology Development / Phase A Concept Development4. Develop budget estimates in coordination with PM and FM


5. Coordinate with HQ AFMC CAM Office Entire document provides an overview on lifecycle costs. In particular, chapter 3.


(NOTE: Items to consider for logistics POM input: Support Equipment (peculiar and common), Packaging, Handling, Storage & Transportation and Marking, Specialized engineered containers (design and testing cost), Technical Data, Initial and Replenishment Spares, Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages, Training systems and Training Equipment, Energy Efficiency, Alternate Fuels considerations, Sustaining Engineering, Support for testing programs, CLS/ICS, Second Destination Transportation, Computer Resources Support and facilities etc). Include any costs for demilitarization, declassification and disposal. Funding for facilities is through MILCON, done separately from the POM process (Ref checklist 2.24A)



Entire document is a useful reference on Integrated Product Support.



Entire document is a good reference for programs with a Contractor Support strategy.

AFI-601, Capabilities Based Requirements Development

This document should be used to support capabilities based support requirements.


http://akss.dau.mil/dag/DoD5000.asp?view=document&rf=GuideBook%5CIG_c1.2.asp






Understand paragraphs 1-2. Use appropriate attachments that apply to your program.


2.37

Draft Capabilities Development Document (CDD)Preferred System ConceptAcquisition Decision Memorandum (ADM)Support & Maintenance Concepts & TechnologiesAnalysis of Alternatives (AoA)Market AnalysisSystem Engineering Plan (SEP) Technology Development Strategy (TDS) Cost/Manpower Estimates



(5.1.3)

Refine Product Support Strategy in LCMP (Increments, PBL, PPP, LOG Elements, etc.)


1. Ensures points from checklist 2.05 are updated LCMP Guide (8.10) Technology Development / Phase A Concept Development

2. Review the CDD for: Defense Acquisition Guidebook (6)

a. System Maintenance/Support Profiles and Use Case Scenarios (Support Capability Packages)

Integrated Defense Acquisition Technology and Logistics Life Cycle Mgmt Framework ("Wall Chart")

b. Reliability and Maintenance Rates 10 U.S.C. 2469c. Support Environment and Locations for Support 10 U.S.C. 2466

d. Support and Maintenance Effectiveness Acquisition Program Baseline (APB) (bottom)

e. Logistics/supportability input to Key Performance Parameters (KPPs)

f. Planning for Peculiar and Common Support Equipment (SE) Affordable System Operational Effectiveness (para 8)

g. Planning for Technical Data Configuration Mgmt (4.2.3.6)h. Planning for Training and training support Configuration Mgmt 2 (5.2.1.4)

3. Continue to influence product design with Life Cycle Logistics (LCL) for Affordable System Operational Effectiveness (SOE) showing dependency and interplay between system performance, availability, process efficiency, and system life cycle cost

Core Logistics Capability (para 3) (5.3.3.1)

4. Review preliminary manpower and personnel requirement and constraints in both quantity and skill levels

Core Logistics Capabilities (10 U.S.C. 2464)

5. Review information and requirements for logistics footprint reductions (include SE) , deployment requirements, other factors affecting the in-theater operational concept

Cost as an Independent Variable (CAIV) (3.2.4)

6. Review the operating and support reliability objectives and their corresponding benefits and resource requirements

Data Management (5.1.3.3)7. Review the assessment of the concept and technology regarding use of embedded diagnostics, prognostics, and similar maintenance enablers

Data Management in Engineering (4.2.3.7)

8. Review data on the projected sustainment demand, standardization of platforms, & required support equipment

Demilitarization and Disposal (5.1.3.8)

9. Review updated Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) for product support strategy, including alternative operating and system support concepts

Environment, Safety, and Occupational Health (ESOH) (para 5) (5.2.1.6)

10. Include the design and development of the support system utilizing Performance Based Logistics (PBL). Include discussion of PBL methodology for implementation and strategy. Review "PBL: A PM's Product Support Guide" for checklists on key product support issues

ESOH (4.4.11)

11. Review the Rough Order of Magnitude (ROM) Life Cycle Cost Estimates (LCCE) for product support elements

Human Systems Integration (HSI) (para 4) (5.2.1.6)



http://akss.dau.mil/ifc/


http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode10/usc_sec_10_00002466----000-.html



http://akss.dau.mil/dag/Guidebook/IG_c4.2.3.6.asp







http://akss.dau.mil/dag/Guidebook/IG_c5.1.3.8.asp#P1




EXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:Capabilities Development Document (CDD)


12. Review initial identification of support-related risk and risk mitigation planning for product support

Human Systems Integration (HSI) 2 (2.3.13)

13. Review requirements for providing sustainment during technology-oriented demonstrations

Industrial Capability (2.3.16.1.4.5)

14. Review the product support strategy found in the Acquisition Strategy for:

Integrated Supply Chain Management (5.1.3.4)

a. Life cycle sustainment and continuous improvement of product affordability, reliability, and supportability, while sustaining readiness

Interoperability (5.1.3.2)b. Supportability planning, analyses, and trade-offs used to determine the optimum support concept and identify the strategies for continuous affordability improvements

Life Cycle Assessment (5.1.3.7)

c. Interoperability (including MOSA strategy for supply, interoperability, maintainability, and follow-on logistics planning for sustainment)

Life Cycle Cost Optimization (5.1.3.5)

15. Review the Technology Readiness Assessment found in the Acquisition Strategy for product support elements

Logistics Footprint Minimization (5.1.3.6)

16. Review the Total System Product Support Package for product support concepts that are based on reliability and maintainability of the system

Market Analysis (para 1) (5.4.1.2.2)

17. Review the Market Analysis for product support capabilities for achieving support objectives through design and elements of support currently provided by legacy systems and the measures to evaluate support effectiveness

MOSA & Interoperability (para 1) (5.1.3.2)

18. Review the Test and Evaluation Master Plan for supportability and appropriate logistics considerations

PBL: A PM's Product Support Guide (All)

19. Refer to the "Product Support Plan for Information Technology Guide" for the appropriate PS elements

PBL (All of 5.3)

20. Review the Work Breakdown Structure for deliverable work products and of life cycle logistics considerations

Methodology for Implementation and Strategy for PBL (5.3.1)

21. Review contracts that perform workloads previously performed by depot-level activities of the DoD, review the Competition Analysis for Depot-Level Maintenance >$3M (refer to 10 U.S.C. 2469)

Product Support (5.1.3.1)

22. HQ AFMC certified the source of repair/core determination and 50/50, include approach to developing organic depot repair capability for workloads identified as core (refer to U.S.C. 2466)

Product Support Strategy in the Acquisition Strategy (5.1.3)

23. Ensure facilities and MILCON funding requirements are addressed lead time away as applicable.

Product Support Plan for Information Technology Guide (SWGDO32)

24. Review Cost as an Independent Variable for cost estimate. Include any funding shortfalls and discuss current and planned cost reduction initiatives

Technology and Industrial Base Plans (10 U.S.C. 2440)

25. Review the Acquisition Decision Memorandum for product support exit criteria

Technology Readiness Assessment Deskbook (TRA) (2.3)

26. For Space Systems refer to Acquisition Strategy per NSSA Policy 03-01

Test and Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP) (para 5)

Total System Product Support Package (para 4)

AFI 63-107 Integrated Product Support Planning and Assessment (1.4.4.2)



See Checklists D-2, D-3, D-4, D-6, D-9, D-10, E-1

NSSA Policy 03-01

http://akss.dau.mil/dag/DoD5000.asp?view=document&rf=Guidebook/IG_c2.3.13.asp

https://afkm.wpafb.af.mil/ASPs/Search/DocViewHigh.asp?Page=http%3A%2F%2Fakss%2Edau%2Emil%2Fdag%2FGuidebook%2FIG%5Fc2%2E3%2E16%2E1%2E4%2Easp&SearchMethod=Phrase&q1=%2210+u%2Es%2Ec%2E+2440%22&DocKey=http%3A%2F%2Fakss%2Edau%2Emil%2Fdag%2FGuidebook%2FIG%5Fc2%25









http://akss.dau.mil/dag/Guidebook/IG_c5.3.asp




https://ossg.gunter.af.mil/applications/sep/documents/SWGD032.doc

http://straylight.law.cornell.edu/uscode/uscode10/usc_sec_10_00002440----000-.html



https://afkm.wpafb.af.mil/ASPs/Search/DocViewHigh.asp?Page=http%3A%2F%2Fakss%2Edau%2Emil%2Fdag%2FGuidebook%2FIG%5Fc5%2E2%2E2%2Easp&SearchMethod=Phrase&q1=%22total+system+product+support+package%22&DocKey=http%3A%2F%2Fakss%2Edau%2Emil%2Fdag%2FGuidebook%2FI





System Performance SpecificationTest and Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP)Validated System Support & Maintenance Objectives & RequirementsSystems Engineering Plan (SEP)Information Support Plan (ISP)Program Protection Plan (PPP)Technology Readiness Assessment (TRA)Inputs to Integrated Baseline Review (IBR)Inputs to Acquisition Strategy, Acquisition Program Baseline (APB)Inputs to Affordability AssessmentInputs to Cost/Manpower Estimate, Independent Cost Estimate and Manpower EstimateInputs to Analysis of Alternatives (AoA)Inputs to Technology Development Strategy (TDS)Inputs to Industrial Capabilities, Cooperative OpportunitiesCore Logistics Analysis/ Source of Repair Analysis, & Competition Analysis for Depot-Level Maintenance >$3M


1.15

Participate in SRR (Demonstrate Concepts) Initial Capabilities Document (ICD)Draft Capability Development Document (CDD)Analysis of Alternatives (AoA)Test and Evaluation StrategySystem Engineering Plan (SEP)Support & Maintenance concept & TechnologiesTechnology Development Strategy (TDS)Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP)



See Checklists D-9, D-11, E-1EXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:Updated Initial Capabilities Document (ICD)Updated Draft Capability Development Document (CDD)Updated Analysis of Alternatives (AoA)Updated Test and Evaluation StrategyUpdated System Engineering Plan (SEP)Updated Product Support StrategyUpdated Technology Development Strategy (TDS)Updated Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP)SRR Minutes

A formal, system-level review conducted to ensure that system requirements have been completely and properly identified and that a mutual understanding between the government and contractor exists.

1. Coordinate with lead engineer regarding supportability requirements

Systems Engineering Fundamentals (Chapters 2, 4, 14, 15, 17, 17A, 18 & 19)Concept Refinement / Pre KDP-A Concept Studies

2. Review applicable documentation against product support strategy such as system maintenance concept, significant system design criteria (reliability, maintainability, logistics requirements, layout drawings, conceptual design drawings, selected supplier components data, support equipment, etc.)

a. Define baseline operational scenarios for system alternatives System Requirements Review Procedures

b. Participate in market research for supportability attributes of potential commercial products

c. Identify and estimate achievable values of logistics and R&M parameters

MIL-HDBK-502 DoD Handbook Acquisition Logistics (All)

d. Establish system readiness objectives and tentative thresholds

3. Ensure product support requirements satisfy the ICD or draft CDD


4. Identify support cost drivers and targets for improvement

https://afkm.wpafb.af.mil/ASPs/DocMan/DocDisplayOnly.asp?Filter=OO-EN-DB&DocID=28782

https://ossg.gunter.af.mil/applications/sep/documents/RDPR011.DOC



TASK #TASK # PROCESS NAME:PROCESS NAME: ENTRANCE CRITERIA:ENTRANCE CRITERIA:Design Interface for Life Cycle Logistics CRRA

Initial Capability DocumentCapability Development DocumentCapability Production DocumentSystems Engineering PlanLife Cycle Management Plan



CE, TD, SDD

3.02.1

Design interface, is part of the supportability analysis and systems engineering process, relating logistics, design parameters to equipment readiness and support resources requirements. The objective of design interface using Performance Based Logistics (PBL) (DoD 5000.1 E1.17) is to minimize total ownership costs while delivering operational capability. An object of design interface is to perform trade offs between reliability, maintainability features of the equipment against support system processes. The PBL minimization forms the object of system engineering analysis with a minimization requirement and the subject to delivering operational capability. Note, that Design Interface is performed iteratively, meaning it is done in each phase of acquisition and recursively meaning that as design is matured it is performed on more detailed understanding of the design, technology and operational use. The Life Cycle Logistician must be a key member in the System Engineering Integrated Product Team (IPT).

1. Strong Participation for Supportability, Sustainment and Product Support in the Program System Engineering Integrated Product Team (SE IPT). Advocate minimum TOC in the SE IPT.

Defense Acquisition Guidebook Para 4.4.9.2

2. Supportability Concepts: Develop with the user, supply chain manager and supporting depot detailed understanding of the maintenance and support concept including all operational limitations and issues. Develop system specification which addresses reliability, maintainability, support equipment, testability (interface with calibration and test equipment specs), deploy ability, mobility, and manpower and personnel estimates. Prepare the Functional Baseline.


3. Supportability Analysis: Interface with the reliability and maintainability program. Perform top down allocation of equipment reliability and maintainability performance requirements while modeling the impact of design decisions on the support processes required for maintaining and sustaining the equipment in its operational use. Maintain records of decisions and analyses supporting justification for design decisions and participate in developing the allocated baseline as well as design test and evaluation for reliability and maintainability performance. Participate in reliability and maintainability test and evaluation and prepare to demonstrate system level logistics capabilities to support the verification processes within system engineering IPT. Develop item development specifications which address reliability, maintainability, support equipment, testability (interface with calibration and test equipment specs), deploy ability, mobility, and manpower estimates. Monitor reliability and maintainability demonstration process as well as reliability improvement activities. Prepare the Allocated Baseline. Coordinate with the program manager’s modeling and simulation process for allocating reliability and maintainability and minimizing total ownership costs. See CBM Plus task: 3.04.X


4. Interact with specialty engineering that impact product support:

· Reliability System Engineering Requirement Process Template


· Maintainability,

· Testability,AFI 63-101 Operation of Capabilities Based Acquisition System

· Deployability/Transportability/Packaging

· Human Machine InterfacesAFI 63-1201, Life Cycle Systems EngineeringOperations &

Support / Phase D Build & Operations





EXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:Systems Engineering PlanLife Cycle Management Plan System SpecificationAllocated BaselinesFunctional Configuration AuditInputs to TEMP updates

· Interoperability

· Calibration and Metrology Defense Acquisition Guidebook Para 4.4.9.1

· Support Equipment

· Standardization System Engineering Functional Analysis Process Template

· Energy and POL· DMSMS

Supportability Resources: Once the equipment’s inherent reliability and maintainability is determined the support resources developed in the trade studies need to be refined, identified, specified and acquired. The results of identifying supportability resources include support equipment recommendation data, provisioning data, etc acquired in the next process.


Supportability Data: Coordinate on engineering data, item development specifications, and maintenance task descriptions, lists of maintenance task assets, facilities requirements, manpower needs and related supportability data requirements. Participate in functional configuration audits and assure that physical configuration audit supports the documentation of supportability requirements.

MIL PRF 49506 Performance Specification Logistics Management Information

System Engineering Task Analysis Process Template




https://acc.dau.mil/GetAttachment.aspx?id=32547&pname=file&lang=en-US&aid=6162


TASK #TASK # PROCESS NAME:PROCESS NAME: ENTRANCE CRITERIA:ENTRANCE CRITERIA:Develop and Acquire Supportability Data Capabilities Development Document

Supportability ObjectivesConfiguration Management PlanStrategic Source of Repair DecisionMaintenance ConceptMilestone B



Milestone B

Milestone C

3.04.1

Supportability data is the foundation for identifying and managing support resources including: supplies, support equipment, technical manuals, training resources and configuration management. Supportability data is acquired as part of the technical data of the weapon system acquisition and contributes to the sustainment processes: data management and configuration management as well as forming the basis for maintenance and supply. Supportability data links the allocated baseline of the weapon system to the physical baseline and integrates technical and engineering data with maintenance and supply data and forms the basis for managing the sustainment of the weapon system.

1. Consider configuration management approach Defense Acquisition Guide Chapter 4, Paragraph 4.4.9

2. Integrate Supportability Data into the Product Life Cycle Management (PLM) plan

3. Understand the maintenance concept, operating scenarios, mobility/transportability requirements and other life cycle support requirements contained in the CDD and EMA


4. Initiate budget for technical data, spares, support equipment, training and system engineering for life cycle logistics and supportability WBS Items

5. Determine Supportability Source Data format reflecting the functional allocation of reliability and maintainability requirements to provide capability at least Total Ownership Costs (TOC) consistent with the planned allocated baseline format, i.e. S1000D

MIL-STD-1840 DoD Interface Standard, Automated Interchange of Technical Information

6. Integrate supportability data with the program manager’s Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) approach

7. Place MIL-PRF-49506 on contract MIL‑T‑31000 Detail Specification Technical Data Packages

8. MIL-HDBK-502 has guidance on LMI Summaries 9. Place tailored MIL-STD-1840 on contract MIL-HDBK-502 DoD Handbook Acquisition Logistics10. Supportability Analysis Summaries (SAS)11. Tailor DI‑ALSS‑81529 Logistics Management Information (LMI) Data Product(s) to deliver supportability data

Acquisition Logistics Guide (1997)

– Order LMI Data products reporting for filing in the PLM for requirements analysis tasks allocating functional baseline requirements for reliability, maintainability, supportability, availability, testability, and support equipment – Order functional analysis LMI data products for results of Maintenance Task Analysis, including results of Failure Modes Effect and Criticality Analysis (FMECA), Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM), Repair Level Analysis (RLA), and related studies for use in Depot Source of Repair selection and identification of supportability resources and supportability data.

12. DI‑ALSS‑81530 Logistics Management Information (LMI) Summaries

13. Link TMCR 86-01 to LMI data products as well as the PLM approach (Reference Checklist 3.19.1)

14. Link Provision Technical Documents to LMI data products15. Tailor DI-ALSS-81529 to deliver Support Equipment recommendations



http://www.dt.navy.mil/tot-shi-sys/des-int-pro/tec-inf-sys/cal-std/doc/1840c.pdf

https://techdata.wpafb.af.mil/engdat/docs/Rev%20C/31000C.pdf


EXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:Milestone decision approvedData and information reports for populating product PLMSource data for Contractor Logistics Supportability Data Checklist 3.18

Individual Repairable Item Data delivered to support Level of Repair decisionsTechnical Reports delivered that detail maintenance plans for all repairable items Technical Reports delivered which provide source data for Technical Maintenance Data and Technical OrdersProvisioning Technical Data supports supply supportLMI Data Input to Support Equipment Recommendation DataTechnical Reports delivered support Manpower and Personnel Estimates and Training PlanningAll proper supporting documentation put in the official filesLMI validated at Physical Configuration Audit (PCA) review all support data and assured the data matches the physical system

16. Acquire training plans17. Develop maintenance plans using tailored DI-ALSS-8152918. Establish integrated digital environment and use interactive workflow to review and manage supportability data

19. Plan transition of supportability data to the supporting ALC20. Refer to checklist 3.18.

Technical Reports delivered which reflect results of maintenance task analysis and Reliability Centered Maintenance provide information for selection of Source Maintenance and Recovery (SMR) codes, Spares, support equipment, Technical Manuals, and so forth

TASK #TASK # PROCESS NAME:PROCESS NAME: ENTRANCE CRITERIA:ENTRANCE CRITERIA:Automated Test Systems (ATS) Acquisition



EXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:ATS Acquisition Strategy

3.04.2 Support Equipment Recommendation Data or equivalent ATS requirement documentation

This checklist enables the Program Manger to make an ATS selection for each requirement that fits within the total DoD investment strategy context, i.e., the costs incurred are to be leveraged to the maximum extent possible within a Service and/or across the joint Services spectrum. The Automated Test Systems Acquisition Checklist provides guidance for defining, developing and implementing ATS solutions for logistics support of Air Force weapon systems. This checklist aids in ensuring that ATS requirements are satisfied while minimizing duplication of existing capability and total ownership costs for all weapon systems.

1. Identify the weapons system support/test requirements DoD ATS Policy Letter Technology Development / Phase A Concept Development

a. Test Requirements

b. Maintenance Requirements (LSA/LSAR) DoD ATS Executive Directorate Home Page

c. Operational Requirements

2. Define the various support/test alternatives DODD 5000.1 The Defense Acquisition System

a. DoD ATS Family

b. Commercial Tester DODI 5000.2 Operation of the Defense Acquisition System

c. Existing Service ATSd. Other DoD Inventory ATS ATS Master Plane. Combination of above

f. New Development ATS DoD ATS Selection Guide (2005)

3. Analyze the alternativesa. Parametric Analysis (UUT test requirements vs. ATS capabilities)

Joint ATS MOA (July 2004)

b. Operational Assessment

c. Cost Benefit Analysis AFPD 63-1 Capability Based Acquisition System

d. ATS Support Requirements

i. Special Tools and Support EquipmentAFI 63-101 Operations of Capabilities Based Acquisition System

ii. Calibration Requirements (AFMETCAL)

4. Select the appropriate ATS support alternative AFPD 63-2 Automatic Test Systems and Equipment


AFI 63-201 Automatic Test Systems and Equipment Acquisition

http://www.acq.osd.mil/ats/USAF_ATS_Policy_Letter_signed_26_Nov_07.pdf

http://www.acq.osd.mil/ats/



http://www.acq.osd.mil/ats/2005_DoD_ATS_Master_Plan_-_Final.pdf

http://www.acq.osd.mil/ats/DoD_ATS_Selection_Process_Guide_2005.pdf

http://www.acq.osd.mil/ats/2004_Joint_ATS_MOA.pdf






TASK #TASK # PROCESS NAME:PROCESS NAME: ENTRANCE CRITERIA:ENTRANCE CRITERIA:Address Support Equipment Management Capability Development Document

Supportability Key Performance Parameters

Mission Assignment Decision

Systems Engineering PlanSystem Performance Specification



5. Process SERD (checklist 3.04.4). Ensure review with SE IPT.

6. Ensure testing is planned and accomplished7. Ensure equipment is delivered and fielded (checklist 4.22)

8. Plan for Sustainment of Support Equipment (see task 7.04)

3.04.3

Product Support Strategy (ref. Life Cycle Management Plan)

Source Of Repair Assignment Process/core/Candidate Depot Decision

Acquisition Strategy Plan complete

Definition: Support Equipment (SE) and its associated logistics support, is all equipment (mobile or fixed) required to support operations and/or maintenance of a materiel system. This includes associated multiuse support items, ground-handling and maintenance equipment, tools, metrology and calibration equipment, and manual/Automatic Test Equipment/System (ATE/ATS).

This checklist enables the Program Manager to make an SE selection for each requirement that fits within the total DoD investment strategy context, i.e., the costs incurred are to be leveraged to the maximum extent possible within a Service and/or across the joint Services spectrum. The Support Equipment checklist provides guidance for defining, developing, implementing and sustaining SE solutions for logistics support of Air Force weapon systems. This checklist aids in ensuring that SE requirements are satisfied while minimizing proliferation and total ownership costs for all weapon systems.

1. Establish SE IPT and DMAWG (checklist 2.20) to include ALC (SSM and SE Manager), Program Office, MAJCOM, AFMETCAL, Prime Contractor, etc.

DAU Acronyms and Terms (B-135)Concept Refinement / Pre KDP-A Concept Studies

2. Minimize the proliferation of system-unique equipment while ensuring the maintenance and deployment requirements of existing and developing systems are met. Acquire SE, to include ATS, that is to the maximum extent common and interoperable with other Services and across multiple weapon systems and munitions. Peculiar SE, to include ATS, shall be developed only as a last alternative.

FEDLOG Information Center

3. Plan for T.O. (checklist 6.08.1), support for SE (include all Integrated Logistics Support elements), Supply Support (checklist), Configuration Management, UID (checklist 2.10), testing and validation/certification, scheduling (checklist 3.04.1).

AFI 63-101 Operation of Capabilities Based Acquisition SystemTechnology Development / Phase A Concept Development

4. Ensure cost estimate is completed (checklist 2.33). Make POM inputs (checklist 2.36)

Air Force Equipment Management System

System Development and Demonstration


a. Identify additional requirements through the requirements determination process. AFEMS is updated by MAJCOMs and will feed the D200C Equipment requirements computation. D200C is run quarterly and provides requirements data to the SE item manager.


b. Develop acquisition program for required replacements and to fill new shortages. Address all ILS elements during planning stages to ensure supportability of newly acquired SE. Both investment and O&M funded items (checklist 3.03.3)

https://afkm.wpafb.af.mil/ASPs/DocMan/DOCDisplayOnly.asp?Filter=OO-AQ-AS-C3&DocID=147393

http://www.dlis.dla.mil/FedLog/default.asp


https://www.afems.wpafb.af.mil/afems/splash.html


k. Modifications

m. Disposal-send to DRMOEXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:

Incorporated in Integrated Master Plan/Integrated Master Schedule

Updated Test Evaluation Master PlanUpdated Systems Engineering PlanUnder Operations and Maintenance Phase demilitarization and disposal plan

c. Input to the budet process by developing Buy/Budget Review Folders requested by D200C Requirements Control Officer (RCO), investment funded only, O&M support equipment items funded through CAM.

d. Accomplish required SE modifications by budgeting appropriate fundin and gainng approval through the CCB process

e. Respond to AFTO 22 requests safety issues or changes by accomplishing required TO update.

f. Perform required repair actions as dictated through the new CAM process

g. POM inputs- Prepare justification needed to obtain 3400 funding to include TDY, supplies, A&AS, BP16, provisioning.

h. Coordinate Calibration requirements with AFMETCAL (checklist 3.03.3)

i. Update Technical Order-Plan for TO updates when field submits changes via the AFTO 22 process and changes are approved or new instruments are included in systems. When a new configurations is procured, the TO must be updated.

j. Obsolete Items Plan for diminishing manufacturing should be addressed by contacting the commodity PM to identify the preferred replacement item.

l. Perform Analysis of Refurbish or Replenish or Replacement when a system is plagued by obsolete items and/or bad actors this analysis should determine if the system needs a mid-life upgrade or there should be a total system replenishment


Supportability Data (Contract Data Requirements List, drawings, Calibration Measurement Requirements Summary, Acceptance Test Procedures, Test Requirements Documents, Test Program Sets,

TASK # PROCESS NAME: ENTRANCE CRITERIA:Calibration Support for New Acquisitions Initiation of all new acquisitions

DESCRIPTION:

CHECKLIST SUBTASKS:TASK SOURCE DOCUMENTATION PHASE

1. Include AFMETCAL when defining supportability requirements.

System Development

4. Include AFMETCAL in the Support Equipment IPT.

5. AFMETCAL will Review Technical Data

6. AFMETCAL will evaluate calibration support alternatives

3.04.4

Definition: Calibration is a comparison between equipment items, one of which is a measurement standard of known accuracy, to detect, correlate, adjust and report any variation in the accuracy of the other item(s).

This checklist reminds the program manager (PM) to consider calibration requirements when initiating a new acquisition. The Air Force Metrology and Calibration Program (AFMETCAL) will assist the PM in a comprehensive review of the weapon system and related support equipment calibration requirements. A comprehensive evaluation of calibration requirements will address verification of system performance parameters from initial acceptance through lifecycle maintenance. The USAF has extensive organic calibration capabilities in equipment standards, laboratories (PMELs), and procedures. Lifecycle calibration costs for your program or system can be minimized by consulting with AFMETCAL.

DODI 5000.2 Operation of the Defense Acquisition Program, Chapters 1.6 and 4.3Concept Refinement / Pre KDP-A Concept Studies

a. Calibration Measurement Requirements Summary (CMRS)

2. Include AFMETCAL when defining supportability requirements in the draft CDD

MIL STD 1839C Calibration and measurement requirementsTechnology Development / Phase A Concept Development

3. Submit a data call to AFMETCAL for CDRL requirements. Include CDRL requirements in the contract.

a. Calibration Measurement Requirements Summary ( CMRS)

DID-QCIC 80278B Calibration Measurement Requirements Summary (CMRS)b. Requirement for SERDs

c. Calibration procedures and related technical dataAFI 63-101 Operation of Capability Based Acquisition System

a. Participate in ILS meetings AFI 21-113 Air Force Metrology and Calibration Program

b. Participate in PDR, CDR, Validation/Verification

c. Review CMRS data AFMETCAL Web Page

d. Review SERD data AF Portal / Robins AFB / 542 Wing/ 562 CBSS

e. AFMETCAL provides input to PM on calibration support concept based on system’s accuracy requirements and available calibration standards

AFMETCAL Public Web Pagea. System KPPs

b. System CMRS TO 00-20-14 Air Force Metrology Program

c. SE commercial technical data

d. SERD dataTO 33K1-100, Calibration Measurement Summaries - See your TODO to order

a. Vendor Support (CLS) 33K series Calibration TOs – See your TODO to order

b. User Calibrationc. Automated Calibration (PATEC Concept)d. PMEL Supportede. Regional / AFPSL supported

7. AFMETCAL will establish and maintain calibration support concept

Production and Deployment Through Operations & Support / Phase D Build & Operations

http://akss.dau.mil/dag/DoD5002/DoD5002-3.7.asp

http://assist.daps.dla.mil/quicksearch/basic_profile.cfm?ident_number=67317



https://www.my.af.mil/afp40/USAF/ep/index.do?command=subOrg&channelPageId=-836307&parentCategoryId=-836307&pageId=681742

https://www.my.af.mil/afp40/USAF/ep/index.do?command=subOrg&channelPageId=-836307&parentCategoryId=-836307&pageId=681742

http://www.afmetcal.af.mil/

http://www.robins.af.mil/shared/media/document/AFD-070517-021.pdf


b. Publish 33K series calibration technical orders c. Assist in Test Program Sets (TPS) developmentd. Provide life cycle calibration support

EXIT CRITERIA:Assist with acceptance testing of deliverables when appropriate.Establishment of a calibration support concept

Production and Deployment Through Operations & Support / Phase D Build & Operations

a. Publish calibration authority in TO 33K-1-100 / Weapon System Calibration Measurement Summary (CMS)

TASK #TASK # PROCESS NAME:PROCESS NAME: ENTRANCE CRITERIA:ENTRANCE CRITERIA:ALC (SSM assigned) has to be identifiedMission Assignment ProcessNeed for Support Equipment



Milestone A

3. PM will include SERD CDRL in RFP

4. After contract award PM notifies PPA of contract number

5. Contractor submits SERD to PPA and PM

7. PPA submits consolidated AFMC 603 to PM

9. PM sends Form 9 to PPA and contractor

Primary Stakeholders – SERDs and Support Equipment

3.04.6Support Equipment Recommendation Data (SERD) process

Support Equipment Recommendation Data (SERD) – A contract deliverable document that lists recommended specific items of support equipment to support a weapon system or item of equipment.

1. PM with SSM contacts Prime Provisioning Activity (PPA) at the ALC

Need to re-establish guidance and policy for SERD

2. PPA will provide CDRL(DI-ALSS-81530/T) with attached documentation to PM

6. PPA distributes SERD and AFMC Form 603 to stakeholders for review and comments/concurrence

8. PM prepares AFMC Form 9 indicating disposition from info on AFMC Form 603

Allowance Standards (AS) Manager: Evaluates the Basis of Issue (BOI) for items to be included in the allowance document. Determines and provides notification of the applicable weapon system TRC and the Program Depot Maintenance (PDM) authorization source code of the applicable AS. Returns the annotated AFMC Form 603 to the SERD Coordinator for stakeholder consolidation. Adds approved SE to the allowance standards upon receipt of approved AFMC Form 9.

Calibration (AFMETCAL): Provides Calibration Measurement and Requirement Summaries (CMRS) if required for the piece of SE. Determines if inclusion in CMRS data item is required or not required. Determines if additional Test Measurement Diagnostics Equipment (TMDE) is required for calibration support of the recommended SE. Returns the annotated AFMC Form 603 to the SERD Coordinator for stakeholder consolidation.

Cataloger - DLIS-KFGC: Determines if the P/N on the SERD has an NSN assigned, and if so, annotates the NSN on the AFMC Form 603. Reviews the cataloging data to determine if the Air Force is a registered user. If the P/N is not stocklisted, verifies the FSC assignment and annotates the correct FSC on the AFMC Form 603. Performs a technical analysis of the SERD for interchangeability and substitutability. Reviews stocklisted items for validity of current management data. Determines if the piece of SE meets the guidelines for inclusion in MIL-HBK-300. Determines if a substitute item exists. Coordinates and returns the annotated AFMC Form 603 to the SERD Coordinator for stakeholder consolidation.

Milestone A


Inventory Manager Specialist/Materiel Manager: Determines how the item is to be managed/purchased and assigns the Method of Support (MOS) code on the AFMC Form 603 and returns it with name, office symbol and phone number to the SERD Coordinator for stakeholder consolidation. Coordinates on assigned NC Number in D143C and forwards the created 86 action to DLIS for NSN assignment

Item (FSC) Equipment Specialist: The ES determines/identifies if a similar item already exists in the government inventory (or may be modified) that will satisfy the requirement in lieu of acquiring the recommended piece of SE. If nonconcurring with the SERD, gives the reason and the substitute part number/stock number desired. Nonconcurrence requires notification to the ES who manages the SE, and the provisioning office will make the notification. Verifies the SMR code (or changes it, as desired), provides correct IMC, DEMIL, ADPEC, PMIC codes. If CFE SE, the E.S. will assign a temporary stock number in D143C System and enter this NCC Number on the AFMC Form 603. Annotates requirements for a RIPPL, Technical Order and software for new SE. Returns the annotated copy of the AFMC Form 603 to the SERD Coordinator for stakeholder consolidation.

Lateral ALC: Receives SERD package from the PPA via e-mail for review/coordination by their ES and IMS/MM (duties as described above). The lateral ALC is responsible for cataloging new, procurable SMR-coded SE. Upon completion, the AFMC Form 603 is returned to the PPA for stakeholder consolidation. (Suspense 36 days)

Provisioning Specialist: Receives the SERD electronically from the contractor or SPO, assigns a Registry Control Number (RCN), prepares the file folders, includes a copy of the D043A screening and forwards the package to the SERD Coordinator. Also provides a SERD Data Sheet (on new contracts) to the SERD Coordinator, giving names of stakeholders. Upon receipt of PCL for SERDs requiring a RIPPL, it is the responsibility of the PS to request a Cost Proposal from the Contractor for submittal of the RIPPL.

SERD Coordinator Receives the SERD package from the PS and prepares the AFMC Form 603 . Electronically sends the SERD, AFMC Form 603 and the D043A screening to the appropriate stakeholders (System ES and DLIS, simultaneously). Consolidates replies and forwards to all other stakeholders simultaneously. Initiates a follow-up if replies are not received by the assigned suspense date. A follow-up is forwarded up the chain of command until the reply is received.

Quality checks all replies, making sure there are no conflicting responses, consolidates the replies on the AFMC Form 603.

Sends the completed AFMC Form 603 to the SPO electronically, and requests a completed AFMC Form 9 (suspense: 15 days).

Milestone A

EXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:SERD with final disposition


Upon receipt of the AFMC Form 9, forwards a copy to all the stakeholders and files a copy in the folder.

If a RIPPL is required, requests the Program Manager complete a PCL in IRD and notify the SERD Coordinator of the Application Program Designator (APD). Upon receipt, the SERD Coordinator prints a copy of the PCL for the file and provides a copy to the PS.

System Program Office (SPO): Provides approved/disapproved AFMC Form 9 to the contractor with a copy to the SERD Coordinator. Prior to choosing Automatic Test Systems, the ATS Policy office must be contacted.

Supply Support Request AFMC Form 918 (SSR) Provisioner: (DLA/other service) Inputs SERD information into the D169 System and forwards SERD Package to DLA/other service for support of AF requirement and/or NSN assignment.

System Support Manager (SSM) Equipment Specialist (ES): Performs a technical review of the SERD package to determine if the recommended item is an appropriate solution to the test or repair requirements. Determines if similar equipment already exists in the government inventory and should be used or may be less expensively modified than that recommended by the contractor. Recommends the Source/Maintenance/Recoverability (SMR) code; Expendability, Repairability, Recoverability Category (ERRC) code (only SE cataloged with S or U ERRC may be entered into the Allowance Standards (AS)); Item Management Code (IMC); Demilitarization (DEMIL) code; Automatic Data Processing Equipment Code (ADPEC); Precious Metals Indicator Code (PMIC), and if applicable, the Materiel Management Aggregation Code (MMAC). Identifies the subsystem Technical Repair Center (TRC) using the item and if the item is repairable, the TRC to repair the item. Returns the annotated AFMC Form 603 to the SERD Coordinator for stakeholder consolidation.

Technology Repair Center (TRC): Reviews the SERD to ensure the SE requirements are included and to determine if quantities, support dates, and acquisition policies are compatible with present and planned workloads. If an additional or a lesser quantity is required other than what the contractor recommends, provides the quantity and a justification. Returns the annotated AFMC Form 603 to the SERD Coordinator for stakeholder consolidation.

Using Commands: Reviews the SERD to ensure the SE requirements are included and to determine if the quantities, support dates, and acquisition policies are compatible with present and planned workloads. If an additional or a lesser quantity is required other than what the contractor recommends, provides the quantity and a justification. Returns the annotated AFMC Form 603 to the SERD Coordinator for stakeholder consolidation.

TASK #TASK # PROCESS NAME:PROCESS NAME: ENTRANCE CRITERIA:ENTRANCE CRITERIA:Condition Based Maintenance Plus (CBM+) CRRA

Initial Capability DocumentCapability Development DocumentCapability Production DocumentSystems Engineering PlanLife Cycle Management PlanFunctional Baseline



3.04.12

CBM+ is the application and integration of appropriate processes, technologies and knowledge based capabilities to improve CBM+ is the application and integration of appropriate processes, technologies and knowledge based capabilities to improve the reliability and maintenance effectiveness of DoD systems and components. At its core, CBM+ is maintenance performed the reliability and maintenance effectiveness of DoD systems and components. At its core, CBM+ is maintenance performed on evidence of need provided by reliability centered maintenance (RCM) analysis and other enabling processes and on evidence of need provided by reliability centered maintenance (RCM) analysis and other enabling processes and technologies. CBM+ uses a systems engineering approach to collect data, enable analysis, and support the decision making technologies. CBM+ uses a systems engineering approach to collect data, enable analysis, and support the decision making processes for system acquisition, sustainment and operations.processes for system acquisition, sustainment and operations.

In conjunction with design interface and related life cycle cost, reliability and maintainability design activities optimize maintenance plans using prognostics and diagnostics technologies in conjunction with Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM) efforts in the context of OSD defined CBM+. The objective is to minimize maintenance time and expenses balanced against acquisition and production costs and life cycle sustainment costs. CBM+ is performed in conjunction with supportability analysis and related system engineering for reliability, maintainability and sustainment, and is one of the OSD Enabling Techniques for life cycle logistics. Prognostics and diagnostics include engineering studies to optimize application of built in test, condition monitoring, operating environment recording and develop detailed knowledge of the relationship between how the equipment is used and how it approaches situations where fault tolerance is degraded and preventive maintenance tasks are needed.

Prognostics done in conjunction with more traditional maintenance task analyses including RCM will permit minimum life cycle costs while maximizing equipment readiness. RCM is a process where the failure modes and effects (FMEA) are analyzed to develop scheduled preventive maintenance tasks to assure the system is safely maintained to perform the mission as well as justified increased reliability performance. CBM+ seeks to lengthen the period between scheduled maintenance tasks while assuring safe and economical operation. All maintainability analyses provide opportunities to justify either maintenance tasks or improved reliability. The object as in Performance Based Logistics is to minimize total See checklist 3.02.

1. Develop supportability requirements in the system functional baseline. Interact with the lead command to determine maintenance concepts, manpower and skills limits, and maintenance burden per unit of operation, built in test objectives, support equipment criteria and related maintainability requirements.

System Engineering activities for Requirements Allocation

2. Assure the requirements are clearly reflected in the system functional baseline and that they are feasible and a test/verification process is planned and resources assigned to verify maintainability achievement. Gray beard lesson learned: equipment built in test languages need to be compatible with Automated Test Equipment and calibration standards used by the USAF. (See Checklist 3.02)

3. Monitor execution of Failure Modes and Effects and Criticality Analysis (FMECA)

System Engineering activities for Functional Analysis

4. Assure feedback to justify reliability, maintainability and testability design features are applied to the development of item development specifications. Analyze support resource impacts of reliability, maintainability and testability design performance.

5. Coordinate reliability, maintainability and supportability data formats and recording systems with the Product Life Cycle Management activity within the program management office. Prepare to deliver logistics management information using MIL PRF 49506.

System Engineering Task Analysis

EXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:Life Cycle Management PlanSystems Engineering Plan System SpecificationAllocated BaselinesFunctional Configuration Audit

6. Perform RCM analysis. Determine minimized Total Ownership Cost maintenance tasks for scheduled and preventive maintenance tasks.

7. Understand system risks related to maintenance activities and justify preventive and scheduled maintenance based on safety, performance and costs. Use required skills, man hours, spares, support equipment, fault isolation processes and related resources estimates required to achieve equipment readiness requirements in both FMEA and RCM evaluations. Retain estimates for use in identifying maintenance task requirements and developing maintenance plans.

MIL-HDBK-470A DoD Handbook Designing and Developing Maintainable Products and Systems Vol. I

8. For maintenance tasks that require time change, determine if the maintenance task could be improved in terms of ownership costs and equipment readiness, if prognostics and diagnostics is applied to reduce maintenance and spare part costs.

9. Document detailed maintenance tasks and required skills, man hours, spares, support equipment, fault isolation processes and related resources required to achieve equipment readiness requirements. Insure this data is available as source data for technical manuals development.

CBM+ Community of Practice:

10. Perform level of repair analysis, using resource and frequency data developed from maintenance task analysis performed using RCM analysis data determine life cycle maintenance assignment of repair tasks to depots. Retain level of repair analysis report to support depot activation budgets and source of repair assignment (SORAP).

Significant process and policy is being developed in DSWS effort in CBM+.

11. Monitor the Failure reporting and Corrective Action System (FRACAS), the Test Analyze and Fix (TAAF) and maintenance demonstration process for achieving system performance.

12. Participate in validation of maintenance activities and modeling and simulation of effects of achieved reliability and maintainability requirements.

AFI 63-1201, Life Cycle Systems Engineering

13. Coordinate in the development of prognostics and predictive maintenance support and deliver trade and engineering studies to the sustaining engineering function for future applications of maintenance and reliability improvement programs.

14. Monitor Design Test and Evaluation for reliability and maintainability performance.


15. Support System Level Logistics Demonstrations.16. Analyze results of System Level Logistics Demonstrations against requirements. Certify system ready for Operational Test and Evaluation (OT&E).

17. Assure that Item Unique Identification is applied to appropriate supply items to assist in life cycle management of individual spare parts and aid in capturing time and usage related data.


DoDI 4151.22 CBM+ for Materiel Maintenance

DoDI 5000.2 Operation of the Defense Acquisition System

DoDD 4151.18 Maintenance of Military Material

DoDD 5134.01 (USD(AT&L))


https://wwwd.my.af.mil/ASPs/CoP/OpenCoP.asp?Filter=OO-TR-AF-10












DAU CLL-201DAU CLL-202DAU CLL-203DAU CLL-204

3.04.13DEVELOP A DIMINISHING MANUFACTURING SOURCES AND MATERIAL SHORTAGES (DMSMS) PROGRAM

Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS) is the loss or impending loss of manufacturers of items or suppliers of items or raw material DMSMS is caused when manufacturers of item or raw material suppliers discontinue production.

The objective is to reduce the impact of DMSMS by identifying and resolving DMSMS issues to ensure the continued availability of items and essential materials needed to support current and, when possible, planned defense requirements, by distributing notices, migrating legacy architectures toward an Open Systems Architecture, and providing DMSMS tools for the single manager. This checklist provides guidance for defining, developing, implementing and sustaining DMSMS solutions for logistics support of Air Force weapon systems. This checklist aids in ensuring that DMSMS program requirements are satisfied while minimizing proliferation and total ownership costs for all weapon systems.

1. Ensure understanding of the Program data acquisition strategy. To establish a DMSMS program engineering design data must be available down to piece/part level

2. Ensure the Program Manager addresses the need for a DMSMS program at the appropriate level. The Program Manager will identify a DMSMS program manager within the program. 3. Develop DMSMS program plan down to piece/part level. Ensure you coordinate with the logistician, engineer, DLA rep, OEM, financial manager, contracting officer and support contractors.

4. Review and update the DMSMS program plan annually or as required.

5. Ensure DMSMS issues are addressed in the:· Acquisition Strategy Plan (ASP)· Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP)· Systems Engineering Plan (SEP)· All design reviews (PDR, CDR, SVV, etc.)· Applicable software functionality· Provisioning Conference· Program Objective Memorandum and Budgetary cycles

· Program Cost Estimates· Weapon System Support Program (WSSP)

6. Accomplish appropriate DMSMS training; courses include:

EXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:DMSMS program planUpdates to SEPUpdates to LCMPProgram Objective Memorandum and Budgetary inputsProgram Cost estimate inputsInputs to Request for Proposal (RFP) section L&M and Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) for technical data

7. The DMSMS program manager will review technology product life cycle phase used in the design for obsolescence. This will include at minimum a review of the developers preferred parts list. 8. Execute the DMSMS program plan. This will include the use of Government Industry Data Exchange Program (GIDEP) and predictive tool(s).

9. When entering the Production & Deployment phase, ensure that the appropriate contract language requires the developer to implement DMSMS best practices.

10. When entering the Operations & Support phase the maintenance and operational concepts will drive DMSMS program implementation. The DMSMS program manager will establish a multi-functional team for an organic maintenance program. Ensure all Performance-Based Logistics (PBL) or Contractor Logistics Support (CLS) contracts contain language requiring an active DMSMS program.

11. The program manager must be aware of all potential changes in maintenance and support concepts I.E. CLS to Organic, for DMSMS implications.


ENTRANCE CRITERIA:ENTRANCE CRITERIA:Systems Engineering Plan (SEP)Acquisition Strategy Plan (ASP)Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP)



Chapter 2

Industrial Capabilities Section

Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS) is the loss or impending loss of manufacturers of items or suppliers of items or raw material DMSMS is caused when manufacturers of item or raw material suppliers discontinue

The objective is to reduce the impact of DMSMS by identifying and resolving DMSMS issues to ensure the continued availability of items and essential materials needed to support current and, when possible, planned defense requirements, by distributing notices, migrating legacy architectures toward an Open Systems Architecture, and providing DMSMS tools for the single manager. This checklist provides guidance for defining, developing, implementing and sustaining DMSMS solutions for logistics support of Air Force weapon systems. This checklist aids in ensuring that DMSMS program requirements are satisfied while minimizing proliferation and total ownership costs for all weapon systems.

DMSMS Case Resolution Guide Technology Development / Phase A Concept DevelopmentDMSMS Guide Book SD-22

DoD 4140.1-R DoD Materiel Management Regulation Chap 3 Sec 6System Development & Demonstration

AFI 63-107, Integrated Product Support and Planning Assessment Production and Deployment / Phase B Preliminary Design/Phase C Complete Design & Build ApprovalAFI 63-1201 Life Cycle Systems Engineering

AFMCI 23-103 Diminishing Manufacturing Sources & Material Shortages Program


AFI 21-118 Improving Air and Space Equipment Reliability & Maintainability

DLA One Book

http://www.dmsms.org/file.jsp?storename=crg_2001.pdf








EXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:DMSMS program planUpdates to SEPUpdates to LCMPProgram Objective Memorandum and Budgetary inputsProgram Cost estimate inputsInputs to Request for Proposal (RFP) section L&M and Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) for technical data


www.dau.mil

AFMCI 63-1201 Implementing Operational Safety Suitability and Effectiveness (OSS&E)and Life Cycle Systems Engineering


Vol. 1, Part 1, Chap. 11AK (WSSP)


https://learn.dau.mil/html/clc/Clc1.jsp?cl=




TASK #TASK # PROCESS NAME:PROCESS NAME:Develop Supply Support Strategy



3.04.14

Supply Support consists of all management actions, procedures, and techniques necessary to determine requirements to acquire, catalog, receive, store, transfer, issue and dispose of spares, repair parts, and supplies. This means having the right spares, repair parts, and supplies available, in the right quantities, at the right place, at the right time, at the right price. The process includes provisioning for initial support, as well as acquiring, distributing, and replenishing inventories

1. Understand the product support strategy, maintenance concept and CONOPS

a. Performance-Based Logistics (PBL)b. Public-Private Partnership (PPP)c. Contractor Logistics Support (CLS)d. Organic Standard Base Supply System (SBSS)e. Interim Contractor Support (ICS)f. Interoperability considerations

2. Include the supply support technical requirements in the Statement of Objectives (SOO) / Request for Proposal (RFP). Ensure data rights are included in the RFP.

3. Review the Depot Source of Repair (DSOR) and Source of Repair Assignment Process (SORAP) decision for possible impacts to supply.

4. Establish inventory control points5. Ensure supply cost requirements are input to the cost estimate, Program Objective Memorandum (POM), Centralized Asset Management (CAM) and budgeting annually or as required.

a. Initial and replenishment sparesb. Spares for support and training equipmentc. Readiness Spares Package (RSP)

d. Depot Level Repair (DLR) and Depot Purchased Equipment Maintenance (DPEM)e. Spares to support planned test programsf. Spares requirements for classified non-reporting bases

g. Reclamation6. Ensure Total Asset Visibility (TAV) is addressed (RFID, UID, Serialized Part Tracking, Global Logistics Support Center (GLSC).

7. Participate in the Provisioning Guidance Conferences and Provisioning Conferences. Ref provisioning cklist

8. Participate in Weapon System Support Program (WSSP) if weapon system uses Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) parts.

EXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:Provide input for LCMP updateInputs to POM, budget, CAM and cost estimatesAll tasks identified in the AFMC Form 718 completedData in WSSP workbench updatedSource of Repair Assignment Process (SORAP) as required

9. Assign and maintain Standard Reporting Designators (SRD)10. Acquire initial, replenishment and pre-operational supply support.

a. Establish stock levels as required

b. Ensure Packaging, Handling, Storage & Transportation (PHS&T) has been addressed

c. Use Military Interdepartmental Purchase Request (MIPR)

11. Manage supply sustainmenta. Ensure quarterly computations for buy and repair actions are occurring. b. Establish Requirements Data Exchange List (RDEL) requirements to Primary Inventory Control Activity (PICA)

12. Plan for and execute demilitarization and disposal of assets

13. Participate in Configuration Control Boards (CCB) and take appropriate supply support actions as required

14. Establish Military Standard Requisitioning and Issue Procedures (MILSTRIP) authority as required


ENTRANCE CRITERIA:ENTRANCE CRITERIA:Approved CONOPS Contract AwardsInitial Capabilities Document (ICD)Capability Development Document (CDD)Configuration Control Board (CCB) established



CLS Guide

Entire Instruction Applies

Supply Support consists of all management actions, procedures, and techniques necessary to determine requirements to acquire, catalog, receive, store, transfer, issue and dispose of spares, repair parts, and supplies. This means having the right spares, repair parts, and supplies available, in the right quantities, at the right place, at the right time, at the right price. The process includes provisioning for initial support, as well as acquiring, distributing, and replenishing inventories

AFI 63-101 Operation of Capabilities Based Acquisition System Concept Refinement / Pre KDP-A Concept Studies

AFI 63-107 Integrated Product Support and Assessment

PBL Guide Technology Development / Phase A Concept Development

DoD 4140.1-R DoD Materiel Management RegulationSystem Development & Demonstration



T.O. 00-25-195 AFTO Source, Maintenance, and Recoverability Coding of AF Weapons, Systems & Equipments

DoD 2010.4


AFPD 23-1 Materiel Management Policy & Procedures

AFI 23-120 AF Spares Requirements Review Board

AFI 23-102 Operational Requirements Instructions for Determining Materiel Requirements for Reparable Items






http://www.tinker.af.mil/shared/media/document/AFD-061220-055.pdf





EXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:Provide input for LCMP updateInputs to POM, budget, CAM and cost estimatesAll tasks identified in the AFMC Form 718 completedData in WSSP workbench updatedSource of Repair Assignment Process (SORAP) as required

AFI 23-102 Operational Requirements Instructions for Determining Materiel Requirements for Reparable Items

AFI 23-105 Spares Breakout Program

USC 2466

AFI 10-602 Determining Mission Capability and Supportability Requirements

AFMCI 23-101 AF Provisioning Instruction

USC 2464

AFMCI 23-111 Reclamation of Air Force Property

AFMAN 23-110 USAF Supply Manual Vol. 1, Part 1, Chap. 11AK

AFI 23-106 Assignment and use of Standard Reporting Designators



http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=browse_usc&docid=Cite:+10USC2466












3.04.15


TASK #TASK # PROCESS NAME:PROCESS NAME:Address Maintenance Planning




3.04.16


3.08Prepare Documentation for Milestone B Determination that MSD for MS B is required

Initial Capabilities DocumentCapability Development Document



SAMPLE


There are two types of decision points: milestone decisions and decision reviews. Each decision point results in a decision to initiate, continue, advance, or terminate a project or program work effort or phase. The review associated with each decision point typically addresses program progress and risk, affordability, program trade-offs, acquisition strategy updates, and the development of exit criteria for the next phase or effort. The Milestone Decision Authority approves the program structure, including the type and number of decision points, as part of the acquisition strategy. Milestone B initiates system development. It is the most common point for formal program initiation in the Defense Acquisition System. There shall be only one Milestone B per program or evolutionary increment.

Each increment of an evolutionary acquisition shall have its own Milestone B. Entrance into this phase depends on technology maturity (including software), approved requirements, and funding. Unless some other factor is overriding in its impact, the maturity of the technology shall determine the path to be followed. Programs that enter the acquisition process at Milestone B shall have an ICD that provides the context in which the capability was determined and approved, and a CDD that describes specific program requirements.


Milestone A Documentation Systems Development & Demonstration - Integration

Standard ASC Milestone Decision Process Guide



NSSA Policy 03-01




TASK #TASK # PROCESS NAME:PROCESS NAME: ENTRANCE CRITERIA:ENTRANCE CRITERIA:Capability Development Document (CDD)Supportability Key Performance Parameters

Mission Assignment Decision

Systems Engineering Plan (SEP)System Performance SpecificationContract Award (SDD)Contract Award (LRIP)Contract Award (FRP)



3.16.1

Accomplish Support Equipment (SE) Guidance Conference

Product Support Strategy (ref. Life Cycle Management Plan)

Source Of Repair Assignment Process / core / Candidate Depot Decision

Support Equipment must be considered and identified (developed if necessary) to support the product support strategy developed during a program's system development & demonstration (SDD) phase, which, is the time frame a program should consider for SE guidance to the contractor. An SE Guidance Conference is accomplished to: ensure the contractor appropriately relates SE to government contractual requirements, the system concept of operations (CONOPS) and maintenance concept are understood, and to ensure DoD guidance and policy for SE acquisition is understood and complied with. Moreover, the information shared and the dialogue established between the contractor and all government SE players, at a guidance conference, will greatly enhance the responsiveness to the end item user and reduce SE proliferation. When it makes economical and program sense, similar guidance efforts could be held for other logistics or program elements and should be considered for joint guidance conferences.

1. Participate in the Support Equipment Guidance Conference AFI 63-101, Operations of Capability Based AcquisitionSystem Development & Demonstration

2. Ensure the following Topics are included in the Guidance Conference Discussion. (not in priority order)

– Air Force (and other DoD & Joint Services, as applicable) program points of contact.

– Program overview AFI 63-107, Integrated Product Support Planning and Assessment Production and Deployment / Phase B Preliminary Design/Phase C Complete Design & Build Approval

– Operations concept (CONOPS) overview– Maintenance concept overview– Training concept overview– Packaging, Handling ,Storage & Transportation perspective, as it relates to SE

– Provisioning process and procedures for SEAFPD 63-2 Automatic Test Systems and Equipment– Data requirements documentation SE recommendation

data (SERD or equivalent):Operations & Support / Phase D Build & Operationso Formats (provide samples as required)

AFI 63-201 Automatic Test Systems and Equipment Acquisition

o Contract performance requirements (delivery schedule)o Deliverable median(s) DoD ATS Policy Letter

o Receiving organizations and number of copieso Government review and approval process DoD ATS Executive Directorate Home Page

o Calibration requirements, Air Force Metrology Calibration (AFMETCAL)

– Procedures for obtaining Government Furnished Equipment (GFE).

DODD 5000.1 The Defense Acquisition System

– Criteria for coding GFE and Contractor Furnished Equipment (CFE)

– SE delivery means and requirements ATS Master Plan

– MIL-HBK-300, or equivalent, use by contractor– Government screening of recommended SE DoD ATS Selection Guide (2005)

– Classification and categories of SE– Technical manuals for SE Joint ATS MOA (July 2004)





http://www.acq.osd.mil/ats/USAF_ATS_Policy_Letter_signed_26_Nov_07.pdf

http://www.acq.osd.mil/ats/


http://www.acq.osd.mil/ats/2005_DoD_ATS_Master_Plan_-_Final.pdf

http://www.acq.osd.mil/ats/DoD_ATS_Selection_Process_Guide_2005.pdf

http://www.acq.osd.mil/ats/2004_Joint_ATS_MOA.pdf

EXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:Update to Capability Development Document (CDD)Update to Product Support Strategy (LCMP)Updates to System Engineering Plan (SEP)Understanding of Support Equipment contract requirements between government and prime contractor

– Procedures for obtaining Air Force publications.– Support Equipment Plan (if applicable)– Other Logistic elements, design interface, human systems integration for SE

AFMCI 23-104 Functions and Responsibilities of the Equipment Specialist During Provisioning

– Contractor's process for identifying and selection of SE supporting system design

– Life cycle cost analysis / Cost Benefit Analysis (as applicable)

AFMCI 23-101 AF Provisioning Instruction

– Instructions to interrogate various data banks and SE sources of information

– Air Force (other Services) Preferred Items – Lists of standard and modified hand tools– Specific discussions on Automatic Test Equipment / Systems (ATE / ATS) process

– Government preferred order of SE selection3. Recommended Air Force and DoD Participants - NOTE: Include Other Joint Service organizations, as applicable, for a program chaired by SPM, Logistics Manager or SSM, as appropriate

– Program Office System Program Manager (SPM)– Program Office Logistics Manager– Program Office Support Equipment Manager (if applicable)– Air Logistics Center (ALC) system and SE specialized Support Equipment Manager(s), as applicable

– Provisioning activity System Support Manager (SSM) / End Article Item Manager (EAIM) ALC)

– Engineering and reliability representative (Program Office/SSM/EAIM ALC)

– Packaging materials handling branch (SPM / EAIM ALC), as applicable

– Equipment allowance specialist (ALC)– AFMETCAL representative– Lead command, using command(s) (inclusive of Air Education & Training Command (AETC), as applicable).

– Technical Repair Center (TRC) maintenance representative, as applicable

– HQ AFMC equipment management representative, as applicable.

– DoD Cataloging and Standardization representative



TASK #TASK # PROCESS NAME:PROCESS NAME: ENTRANCE CRITERIA:ENTRANCE CRITERIA:Test Readiness CertificationContractIdentification of Deficiency


(system does not meet minimum operational requirements but does not meet the safety or mission impact criteria of a

Other categories of deficiencies are contained in T.O. 00-35D-54.


System Development

Technical OrdersSpares Click on "Standards"Support Equipment G021Calibration

EXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:DR DispositionIdentify supportability trends

3.16.2Provide Logistics Support During the Deficiency Reporting (DR) Process

A Deficiency Report is the generic term used within the USAF to record, submit and transmit deficiency data which may include, but is not limited to a Deficiency Report involving quality, materiel, software, warranty, or informational deficiency data submitted using the SF 368 or equivalent format.

Category I Deficiency - Category I deficiencies are those which may cause death, severe injury, or severe occupational illness; may cause loss or major damage to a weapon system; critically restricts the combat readiness capabilities of the using organization; or which would result in a production line stoppage.

Category II Deficiency - Category II deficiencies are those that impede or constrain successful mission accomplishment

Category I deficiency). It may also be a condition that complements, but is not absolutely required for, successful mission accomplishment. The recommended enhancement, if incorporated, will improve a system’s operational effectiveness or suitability.

This checklist is not all inclusive for the DR process during various phases of an acquisition and sustainment program but is meant to focus upon DR tasks a logistics manager would be involved in.

1. Understand T.O. 00-35D-54 and the local DR process. TO 00-35D-54 USAF Deficiency Reporting, Investigation, and Resolution

2. Become a participating member of the review team. 3. Review proposed DR for supportability considerations and impacts.

MIL-HDBK-61A, Configuration Management Guidance


4. Initiate actions to ensure supportability considerations are implemented as required. (See 3.16.3 CCB Checklist if required)

5. Follow local exhibit management, storage and processing procedures.

AFI 63-1201 Life Cycle Systems Engineering

6. Make appropriate changes to system documentation i.e; Operations & Support / Phase D Build & Operations

ANSI/EIA 649A

will migrate to Joint Deficiency Reporting System (JDRS)

Deficiency Reporting Investigation System (DRIS)SF 368

Product Quality Deficiency Report




http://www.geia.org/

http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/infomgt/forms/eforms/sf0368.pdf

TASK #TASK # PROCESS NAME:PROCESS NAME: ENTRANCE CRITERIA:ENTRANCE CRITERIA:Participate in the Configuration Control Boards (CCB) Identification of Deficiency

Technology InsertionDESCRIPTION:DESCRIPTION:

Configuration Identification Configuration Control Configuration Status Accounting Configuration Verification and Audit Data ManagementCHECKLIST SUBTASKS:CHECKLIST SUBTASKS:TASKTASK SOURCE DOCUMENTATIONSOURCE DOCUMENTATION PHASEPHASE

System Development

Technical data (Drawings, TO, Data, etc.) Click on "Standards"

SparesSupport EquipmentCalibration

EXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:Identify supportability Issues (ILS Checklist)Verified changes incorporated in all affected items, documentsStatus accounting data base appropriate to each phaseConfiguration Management-competent contractor baseConfiguration Management process performance measured & continuously improvedLesson learned

3.16.3 Design Change(s) (Hardware/Software/Firmware/Interface)

The purpose of CCB is to assist in planning for and implementing effective DoD or contractor configuration management activities and practices during all life cycle phases of defense systems and configuration items. It supports acquisition based on performance specifications, and the use of industry standards and methods to the greatest practicable extent. Activities and practices include:

1. Understand MIL-HDBK-61A, local and contractor CCB process. MIL-HDBK-61A, Configuration Management Guidance

2. Become a participating member of the CCB team. 3. Review proposed changes for supportability considerations and impacts (i.e. ILS elements, Facility, and Support Equipment)


4. Initiate actions to ensure supportability considerations are implemented as required

AFI 63-1201, Life Cycle Systems Engineering

5. Follow local exhibit management, storage and processing procedures for changes

6. Make appropriate changes to system documentation i.e; ANSI/EIA 649A

AFI 63-101Operation of Capabilities Based Acquisition SystemOperations & Support / Phase D Build & Operations

CCB Recommendations and Disposition






TASK #TASK # PROCESS NAME:PROCESS NAME:Accomplish Spares Provisioning Guidance Conference


Improperly prepared Provisioning Technical Documentation (PTD).Delinquent submission of PTD.Inadequate/omitted Supplemental Data for Provisioning (SDFP).Incomplete or invalid recommendations by the contractor.Late scheduling of the provisioning conference and the resulting delivery of the initial support.


3.16.4

During this conference, the contractor(s) is alerted of the provisioning requirements for the production contract. Sufficient details on the provisioning documentation and data submission media and procedures will be provided so that the contractor(s) can provide realistic responses to the RFP or RFQ. This communication between the Air Force and the contractor(s) can provide the Contracting Office with topics to negotiate during the production contract negotiations. This provides a responsive and effective provisioning effort. The guidance conference provides an opportunity for explanation of the current logistics concept or plan applicable to the system/end article under contract as well as the techniques and methods used by the Air Force in requirements determinations. This conference should result in a mutual understanding, and reduce

1. Establish a firm date and location with the contractor or prospective contractor(s).

2. Prepare and distribute, on a timely basis, the conference notification, AFMC Form 771. If sufficient time is not available to insure delivery of the conference notification by mail, the notification will be issued by message.

3. Develop agenda and furnish a copy with each AFMC Form 771 distributed.

4. Prepare or review tentative milestone dates for the provisioning actions.5. Obtain qualified personnel for detailed discussions such as; Engineers, Equipment Specialist, Item Manager, Production Manager, Packaging, Using Command and DLA representative.

6. Obtain a copy of the Initial Provisioning Performance Specification (IPPS) with attachments and applicable programming checklists available for the conference.7. Hold a closed Air Force familiarization meeting before conducting the conference to:

a. Review proposed agenda for the conference.b. Resolve any difference of opinion.c. Establish or review the rules of conduct to be in effect during the conference.d. Recognize and resolve any questions/discussions that relate solely to internal Air Force affairs so as to avoid undue embarrassment.e. Achieve an Air Force position.f. Meeting chairperson may invite other government agencies such as DLA or have a separate government only meeting.8. Review the maintenance and support concept

strategies.9. Request contractor to hold a briefing on the system/end article on contract. The briefing should generally include:

a. Design/maintainability/reliability.b. Operation requirements.c. Equipment capabilities.d. Organizational structure in relation to manufacture, delivery, and logistics support.

EXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:Approved Provisioning Performance Schedule

e. Tour of manufacturer's area if conference is held at the contractor's facility.f. Contractor(s) proposed Provisioning Performance Schedule (PPS).10. Government agrees to PPS.


ENTRANCE CRITERIA:ENTRANCE CRITERIA:Spares acquisition CLIN on contract


Improperly prepared Provisioning Technical Documentation (PTD).Delinquent submission of PTD.Inadequate/omitted Supplemental Data for Provisioning (SDFP).Incomplete or invalid recommendations by the contractor.Late scheduling of the provisioning conference and the resulting delivery of the initial support.


During this conference, the contractor(s) is alerted of the provisioning requirements for the production contract. Sufficient details on the provisioning documentation and data submission media and procedures will be provided so that the contractor(s) can provide realistic responses to the RFP or RFQ. This communication between the Air Force and the contractor(s) can provide the Contracting Office with topics to negotiate during the production contract negotiations. This provides a responsive and effective provisioning effort. The guidance conference provides an opportunity for explanation of the current logistics concept or plan applicable to the system/end article under contract as well as the techniques and methods used by the Air Force in requirements determinations. This conference should result in a mutual understanding, and reduce

AFMCI 23-101 Air Force Provisioning Instruction, chapter 6.2System Development Demonstration

AFMC Form 771 Conference NotificationProduction and Deployment / Phase B Preliminary Design/Phase C Complete Design & Build Approval




EXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:Approved Provisioning Performance Schedule


3.18

Capabilities Development Document (CDD)System Performance Specification

Systems Engineering Plan (SEP)Test and Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP)Integrated Baseline Review (IBR)Acquisition Strategy (AS) Acquisition Program Baseline (APB)Affordability AssessmentIndustrial Capabilities, Cooperative Opportunities




Baseline Product Support Strategy in LCMP (Increments, PBL, PPP, LOG Elements, etc.)

Validated Systems Support & Maintenance Objective & Requirements

Core Logistics Analysis/Source of Repair Analysis, & Competition Analysis for Depot-Level Maintenance >$3M

Minutes from the System Functional Review (SFR) and Critical Design Review (CDR)

Updated Cost Analysis Requirements Description (CARD)


1. Ensure points from checklist 2.37 are updated LCMP Guide (all) System Development & Demonstration (System Integration)

2. Review the CDD for duration of support, sustainment planning, and any overarching changes in DOTMLPF

Defense Acquisition Guidebook (4.0 & 5.0)

3. Review the Systems Engineering Plan for product support strategy


4. Review the product support strategy for: AFI 63-107 Integrated Product Support Planning and Assessment (1.4.4.2)

a. Improvements on how the program addresses the support and fielding requirements necessary to meet readiness and performance objectives, lower total ownership cost, reduce risks, and avoid harm to the environment and human health (2.3.12)

Cost as an Independent Variable (CAIV) (3.2.4)

b. Contracting approach for product support throughout the system life-cycle (see 5.3.1 of the DAU Guidebook for more detail)

Configuration Mgmt (4.2.3.6)5. Total Life Cycle Systems Management (TLCSM) concepts found in the product support strategy for:

Configuration Mgmt 2 (5.2.1.4)a. Supportability, life cycle costs, performance, and schedule comparable in making program decisions

Data Management (5.1.3.3)b. Planning for operations & support and the estimation of total ownership costs.

Data Management in Engineering (4.2.3.7)

c. System effectiveness and any improvements to life cycle product affordability

Develop Performance Outcomes (5.3.1.4)

6. Review development of Performance Based Logistics (PBL) Business Case Analysis (BCA) to determine relative cost vs. benefits of different support strategies, impact and value of performance/cost/schedule/sustainment trade-offs, and data required to support and justify the PBL strategy

DoD Directive 5000.1; E1.17 - Performance-Based Logistics

7. Ensure support concepts satisfy user specified requirements for sustaining support performance at the lowest possible life cycle cost for each evolutionary increment of capability to be delivered to the user including:

MOSA & Interoperability (para 1) (5.4.1.3.2)











http://akss.dau.mil/dag/DoD5001/Enclosures_1.1.asp#E1.17


EXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:Product Support StrategyProduct Support Plan

System Development & Demonstration (System Integration)

a. Review applicable operational effectiveness analyses to ensure support concepts meet warfighter-specified levels of combat and peacetime performance

PBL: A PM's Product Support Guide (All)

b. Logistics support that sustains both short and long-term readiness

Product Support Strategy (5.1.3)

c. Minimal total life cycle cost to own and operate (i.e., minimal total ownership cost)

Product Support Concepts (5.1.3.1)

d. Maintenance concepts that optimize readiness while drawing upon both organic and industry sources

Product Support Strategy in the Acquisition Strategy (5.1.3)

e. Data management and configuration management that facilitates cost-effective product support throughout the system life cycle

Product Support Plan for Information Technology Guide (SWGD032)

f. Support Equipment (peculiar and common) Technology and Industrial Base Plans (10 U.S.C. 2440)

g. Ensure Energy Efficiency and Alternate Fuels are considerations.

8. Include performance outcomes and corresponding metrics for operational availability, operational reliability, Cost per Unit Usage, Logistics Footprint, and Logistics Response Time

Technology Readiness Assessment Deskbook (TRA) (2.3)

9. Given the operational environment and combatant commander availability requirements, define the logistics reliability targets and the corresponding sustainment infrastructure

Total System Product Support Package (para 4) (5.4.1.2.1)

10. Review maintainability for comprehensive identification of both projected maintenance strategy, including diagnostics, prognostics, maintenance duration targets, and similar measures

11. Review the Total System Product Support Package for product support concepts that are based on reliability and maintainability of the system including manpower and personnel & Training systems/Computer based training.


12. Review the collection, analysis, and evaluation of system performance and maintenance performance data to determine the need for and prescribe changes to the system configuration, maintenance support structure, and maintenance resource requirements. Independent Logistics Assessment (ILA) Handbook

13. Review identification of potential organic depot-level sources of maintenance alternative and refine logistics support considerations correspondent with the evolutionary acquisition strategy (when employed).

See checklists D-2, D-3, D-4, D-6, D-9, D-10, D-16, E-1


AFH 32-1084 Facility Requirements

15. 15. For Space systems refer to Acquisition Strategy per NSSA Policy 03-01

NSSA Policy 03-01


http://akss.dau.mil/dag/DoD5000.asp?view=document&rf=GuideBook%5CIG_c2.3.12.asp



https://ossg.gunter.af.mil/applications/sep/documents/SWGD032.doc

http://straylight.law.cornell.edu/uscode/uscode10/usc_sec_10_00002440----000-.html


https://afkm.wpafb.af.mil/ASPs/Search/DocViewHigh.asp?Page=http%3A%2F%2Fakss%2Edau%2Emil%2Fdag%2FGuidebook%2FIG%5Fc5%2E2%2E2%2Easp&SearchMethod=Phrase&q1=%22total+system+product+support+package%22&DocKey=http%3A%2F%2Fakss%2Edau%2Emil%2Fdag%2FGuidebook%2FI






3.19

Contract AwardCDRLs on contractTest and Evaluation Management Plan (TEMP)Support & Maintenance Concept & TechnologiesTechnology Development Strategy (TDS)Set Product Support Strategy



4. Prepare for Milestone C decision5. Update Acquisition Plan for Source SelectionEXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:Demonstrated Product Support CapabilityUpdated Acquisition Contract

Contractor Logistics Supportability Data (Including COTS and CDRLs)

Provides examples and guidance to develop Contractor Data Requirements List to place on contract to logistically support the product from development/demonstration to production phase. A formal, system-level review conducted to ensure that system requirements have been completely and properly identified and that a mutual understanding between the government and contractor exists.

1. Coordinate with lead IPT and contractor(s) regarding supportability to ensure CDRLs meet requirements.

Systems Engineering FundamentalsSystem Development and Demonstration

2. Determine COTS requirements

Entire document provides an overall on Systems Engineering. See Chapter 19 for Contracting information.

3. Verify contractor meets CDRL deliverables. Some examples of types of CDRLs are:

a. DI-CMAN-81254A, Request for Nomenclature MIL-HDBK-502 DoD Handbook Acquisition Logistics

b. DI-SESS-81000B, Product Drawings and Associated Lists Entire document is helpful. See Sections 5, 6, 7, and 8 for related subject information.

c. DI-MGMT-80004, Interim Contractor Support Plan

d. DI-MGMT-80004, Training Plan Defense Acquisition Guidebook Chapter 7 (COTS)

e. DI-MISC-80508B, Technical Reports/Studies/Services for Training System Requirements Analysis (TSRA)

f. DI-MGMT-80004, Site Activation Plan Independent Logistics Assessment (ILA) Handbook

g. DI-ALSS-81530, Logistics Management Information (LMI) Summaries SERD Standard List (tailored for both common hand tools and support equipment)

See Checklists D-9, D-10, D-11, D-12, D-16

h. OT-2004-9001 Training Development and Material AIDS -- This DID for CDs to accomplish familiarization training, O level training and D level training.)

i. TMCR, TM-86-01F, Technical Manualsj. DI-MISC-81454A Automated Computer Program Identification Number Data and Control Record

k. DI-ILSS-80134A, Proposed Spare Parts Listl. Review applicable documentation against product support strategy such Life Cycle Management Plan, Validate Systems Support & Maintenance Objectives & Requirements, SEP, etc.)

NOTE: The DIDs listed above are only samples of what a program may need to be logistical supportable.



http://akss.dau.mil/dag/DoD5000.asp?view=document&rf=GuideBook%5CIG_c7.10.6.5.asp


TASK # PROCESS NAME: ENTRANCE CRITERIA:Manage a Technical Order Acquisition Program Capability Development Document (CDD)

Maintenance StrategyProduct Support Strategy

DESCRIPTION:

CHECKLIST SUBTASKS:TASK SOURCE DOCUMENTATION PHASE

EXIT CRITERIA:Delivery of formal TOs.Transition TOs to ALC based on Program requirements / schedule

3.19.1Technical Manual Contract Requirements (TMCR) Document, TM-86-01

Technical order requirements must be progressively monitored and updated to ensure completion and delivery concurrent with the equipment or hardware. The organization or individual assigned TO acquisition responsibility is called the Technical Order Manager. This checklist gives instruction on how to manage a technical order acquisition program from development of the strategy to sustainment of the formal manuals.

1. Generate a Technical Order Management Plan (TOMP) as soon as feasible.

Generic TOMP System Design & Development

2. Once a TO acquisition program is established and a contract awarded, begin managing the activities involved with delivery of preliminary and formal technical manuals. The TO Manager and Contractor will:

TO 00-5-3 Air Force Technical Manual Acquisition Procedures


a. Perform TO Guidance Conference Develop TO strategy

b. Number and index TOs as required. See TO Numbering & Indexing Process Flow.

Technical Order Contract Requirements

c. Perform In Process Reviews (IPR) as required by the contract.

TO Delivery Requirements

d. Monitor contractor TO certification process. AFI 61-204 Disseminating Scientific and Technical Information

e. Contractor will update preliminary TOs as they are reviewed and certified.

TM 86-01

f. Contractor will submit proposed Commercial off the shelf (COTS) manuals for government evaluation and acceptance as required.

Manage TO Acquisition Program

g. Contractor will deliver certified, preliminary TOs IAW the TMCR.

TO Verification Planning

3. Verification planning is a critical step in the acquisition process of preparing and delivering adequate and accurate TOs that meet the needs of the users. Verification planning decisions will be documented in a TO Verification Plan (TOVP) prepared by the TO manager.

TO Verification

4. The TO Manager will ensure verification is performed and documented IAW TO 00-5-3 and the TOVP. Contractor support will be IAW TM-86-01.

Generic TOVP

5. The TO Manager will perform pre-pub reviews as required IAW TO 00-5-3 and TMCR.

MIL-PRF-32216

6. Contractor will deliver formal TOs IAW the TMCR TO Numbering & Indexing Process Flow

7. Contractor will develop and deliver formal TO updates if required by the TMCR.

TO 00-5-18 AF Technical Order Numbering System

8. Budget (POM) for TO sustainment 2 years prior to transition to the ALC (if applicable).

AFI 21-303 Technical Orders

AFI 65-601 Vol. 1 Budget Guidance and Procedures











http://www.pdsm.wpafb.af.mil/toprac/appdx-c.doc


https://afkm.wpafb.af.mil/ASPs/docman/Process/ProcessDOCFunctions.asp?DocID=1692127&Function=ViewDocument&FolderID=OO-LG-MC-37-39-2-1-1&Filter=OO-LG-MC-37



http://www.e-publishing.af.mil/shared/media/epubs/AFI65-601V1.pdf

TASK #TASK # PROCESS NAME:PROCESS NAME: ENTRANCE CRITERIA:ENTRANCE CRITERIA:Establish and Manage Training Systems Acquisition Strategy approved

Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) completed Systems Engineering Plan (SEP) completedContract awarded



a. Systems Requirements Reviewb. Preliminary Design Review ASD-TR-90-5000, ST 2000c. Critical Design Review

a. Government In-plant testingb. On-site Acceptance testing

c. Final device certification 3. Training Devices are sustained via the following:

a. Contractor Logistics Support

b. Training System Support Center Integrated Logistics Support Plan

Performance Based Logistics

6. Transfer Contract to Air Logistics CenterEXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:Devices and training materials delivered and used for trainingAnnual sustainment contract options set upAnnual training and instruction contract options set upTraining System Support Center tracking device baselines and also incorporating minor modifications into devicesDevices maintaining concurrency with aircraftContract responsibility transferred to Air Logistics Center

3.19.4Training System Requirements Analysis (TSRA) completed

Responsible for developing and sustaining aircraft training systems to train aircrew and maintenance students. The program uses the four Training System Requirements Analysis Reports to identify and assign the mandatory training tasks to both the maintenance and aircrew training devices. The devices and training materials are built, tested, approved and delivered to the government. After delivery, the devices and training materials are maintained using contractor logistics support and updated to keep concurrent with aircraft modifications. The following checklist represents a standardized training system program tasks. Depending on the scope of the program, these tasks maybe removed if not applicable.

1. Design of training devices meets contractual specification requirements via the following milestones:

677 AESG OI 63-5 Systems Engineering


2. Training devices are tested to ensure compliance with contractual specifications. Two phases of testing include:

AFI 36-2251, Management of Air Force Training Systems

Air Force Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) GuideSystem Development and Demonstration

4. Ensure all facilities requirements are identified and tracked including any facility modifications

Operations & Support / Phase D Build & Operations5. Ensure all manpower and personnel requirements are identified

and planned for. REF checklist 2.24.1



TASK #TASK # PROCESS NAME:PROCESS NAME: ENTRANCE CRITERIA:ENTRANCE CRITERIA:Test and Evaluation StrategyLive Fire Test StrategyInitial Capabilities Document (ICD)(Draft) Capability Development Document (CDD)(Draft) System Engineering Plan (SEP)Support & Maintenance Concept & Technologies



EXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:Approved/Updated TEMPUpdated Test and Evaluation StrategyUpdated Live Fire Test StrategyUpdated Initial Capabilities Document (ICD)Updated Capability Development Document (CDD)Updated System Engineering Plan (SEP)Updated Product Support Strategy in the Life Cycle Management PlanUpdated Support & Maintenance Concept & Technologies

3.20

Identify and Plan Supportability Requirements for the Test and Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP)

A comprehensive plan of developmental and operational testing to determine system suitability and readiness for delivery to operational users.

1. Ensure product support KPPs are fully tested, analyzed, and assessed within the TEMP to meet acceptance criteria.

Defense Acquisition Guidebook, Chapter 9, Integrated Test and EvaluationTechnology Development / Phase A Concept Development

2. Ensure product support strategy and CONOPs are assessed for operational safety, suitability and effectiveness.

3. Ensure TEMP assesses product support readiness to include training for maintenance and operators.

AFPD 99-1, Test and Evaluation ProcessSystem Development and Demonstration

4. Ensure TEMP assesses system logistics footprint.

5. Ensure TEMP assesses product support facility and infrastructure requirements.

DoD Guide for Achieving Reliability, Availability, and Maintainability


6. Ensure TEMP assesses maintenance procedures, to include technical manual development and data availability.

(Paragraphs: 1.5.1, 2.3.3, 2.3.5, 4.6, 5.4.1, 5.5.3)

7. Ensure TEMP assesses support equipment suitability (to include calibration requirements) and compatibility with system maintenance concept

8. Ensure TEMP assesses on-equipment vs. off-equipment maintenance tasks.

9. Ensure TEMP assesses system size and weight, permitting economical handling, loading, securing, transporting, and disassembling for shipment, to include handling hazardous materials.

AFI 99-103, Capabilities Based Test and EvaluationOperations & Support / Phase D Build & Operations

10. Ensure TEMP includes the means to assess future logistics initiatives, due to cost reduction, technology developments, etc.

http://akss.dau.mil/dag/


http://www.dote.osd.mil/reports/RAMGuide.pdf



3.23

Initial Capabilities Document (ICD)Draft Capability Development Document (CDD)Analysis of Alternatives (AoA)Test and Evaluation StrategySystem Engineering Plan (SEP)Support & Maintenance Concept & TechnologiesTechnology Development Strategy (TDS)Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP)Draft System SpecificationSRR (Demo) Minutes, if applicable



(Chap 11 page 104)

6. Ensure Energy Efficiency and Alternate Fuels are considered.

Participate in System Requirements Review (SRR) (System Functional Specification)

A formal, system-level review conducted to ensure that system requirements have been completely and properly identified and that a mutual understanding between the government and contractor exists.

1. Coordinate with lead engineer regarding supportability requirements

Systems Engineering FundamentalsTechnology Development / Phase A Concept Development

2. Review applicable documentation against product support strategy such as system maintenance concept, significant system design criteria (reliability, maintainability, logistics requirements, layout drawings, conceptual design drawings, selected supplier components data, etc.)

3. Ensure product support requirements satisfy the ICD or draft CDD

System Requirements Review Procedures

4. Ensures that the system supportability requirements are consistent with the preferred system solution

5. Understand the approach and methods planned for use in arriving at a balanced set of requirements to include product support (manpower, personnel, training, reliability, supportability, life cycle cost analysis, etc.)


7. Ensure provisioning concepts and strategies are compatible with maintenance concept

8. Ensure contractual requirements levy the need for detailed facility requirements data

Navy Acquisition Guide

9. Participate in site survey development and input into the Facility project books

10. Provides an overview of government and contractor data rights for the system to include what key technical information and data will be developed during this phase

ISO 15288 (for fee service)

11. Review the technical approach reflect the capabilities, concepts of operation and support, and required attributes

12. Understanding requirements driving the preferred system concept, including: potential statutory and regulatory requirements, supportability requirements, training requirements, life-cycle cost requirements, and other design considerations


13. Review applicable operational effectiveness analyses to understand the linkage between overall operational effectiveness, weapon system performance, and execution of an effective product support strategy

14. Establish a consistent set of objectives for readiness and logistics parameters


15. Conduct trade-offs among design, support concepts, and support resource requirements.

16. Participate in market research for supportability attributes of potential commercial products; assess impact of deployment, evaluate support alternatives

AFI 10-602 Determining Mission Capability andSupportability Requirements




http://nawctsd.navair.navy.mil/Resources/Library/Acqguide/Acqguide.htm

http://www.15288.com/




EXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:Updated Capability Development Document (CDD)Updated Analysis of Alternatives (AoA)Updated System Engineering Plan (SEP)Updated Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP)Test and Evaluation Management Plan (TEMP) or equivalentTechnology Readiness Assessment (TRA)System Performance Specification


17. Ensure logistics decisions and risk identified and are incorporated into the minutes




3.27

Participate in System Functional Review (SFR) Capabilities Development Document (CDD)Acquisition Program Baseline (APB)Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP)Test & Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP)System Engineering Plan (SEP)

Draft System Performance SpecificationSystem Functional SpecificationSystem Verification PlanFunctional Analysis and Allocation of Reqmts Technical Performance Measurement data and analysis




Validated System Support and Maintenance Objective Requirements

A formal review of the conceptual design of the system to establish its capacity to satisfy requirements. It establishes the functional baseline.

1. Participate in refining the system functional baseline for supportability Defense Acquisition Guidebook System Development

& Demonstration (System Integration)

2. Review applicable documentation against product support strategy such as system maintenance concept, significant system design criteria (reliability, maintainability, logistics requirements, layout drawings, conceptual design drawings, selected supplier components data, etc.)

3. Ensure provisioning concepts and strategies are compatible with maintenance concept

Systems Engineering Fundamentals

4. Understanding the linkage between overall operational effectiveness, weapon system performance, and execution of an effective product support strategy


6. Conduct trade-offs among design, support concepts, and support resource requirements.

System Requirements Review Procedures

7. Ensure the system functional requirements satisfy the Capability Development Document for product support

8. Ensure adequate product support processes and metrics are in place for the program to succeed

MIL-HDBK-502 DoD Handbook Acquisition Logistics (All)

9. Identify product support risks known and manageable for development

10. Ensure the Cost Analysis Requirements Description is consistent with the approved functional baseline for product support

MIL-HDBK-61A, Configuration Management Guidance (Tables 4.2-4.3)

11. Participate the system functional baseline been established to enable proper configuration management for product support

ASC/EN Guide: Technical Reviews/Audits for Aeronautical Weapon Systems Acquisition

System Functional Review Procedure (Gunter)

Navy Acquisition Guide



https://akss.dau.mil/dag/DoD5000.asp?view=document&rf=GuideBook%5CIG_c4.5.8.asp






https://afkm.wpafb.af.mil/ASPs/DocMan/DOCDisplay.asp?Filter=OO-EN-DB&DocID=267375


http://nawctsd.navair.navy.mil/Resources/Library/Acqguide/Acqguide.htm




3.29

Participate in Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Capabilities Development DocumentTechnical Performance Measurement DataLife Cycle Management Plan (LCMP)System Engineering PlanSystem Performance SpecificationSystem Allocated BaselineCost Analysis Requirements DescriptionLife Cycle Cost AnalysisTest and Evaluation Management Plan

Supplier data describing specific components

Successful completion of all SRR action items Applicable CDRLs



Example:

Acquisition Program Baseline

Equipment layout drawings and preliminary drawings (includes proprietary or restricted data)

Existing documentation (technical orders; commercial manuals; preliminary materials, parts, and processes; analyses; reports; trade studies; logistics support analysis data; etc.

A formal review that confirms the preliminary design logically follows the System Functional Review findings and meets the requirements. It normally results in approval to begin detailed design. For complex systems, the program manager may conduct a PDR for each subsystem or configuration item, leading to an overall system PDR. When individual reviews have been conducted, the emphasis of the overall system PDR should focus on configuration item functional and physical interface design, as well as overall system design requirements.

1. Review progress of long-lead time support equipment items and Support Equipment Requirements Document (SERD) procedures

DoD Systems Engineering FundamentalsSystem Development & Demonstration (System Integration)

2. Review the reliability/maintainability/availability to include support equipment items

3. Review calibration requirementsASC/EN Guide: Technical Reviews/Audits for Aeronautical Weapon Systems Acquisition

4. Describe technical manuals and data availability to include support equipment.

5. Verify compatibility of proposed support equipment with the system maintenance concept

6. Verify on-equipment vs. off-equipment maintenance task trade study results to include support equipment impacts

SISP 1.0, Combined PDR/CDR

7. Review updated list of required support equipment8. Review Level 1 engineering drawings for ease of conversion to higher levels

9. Review repair rate sources and prediction methods10. Identify design changes that will permit a greater use of standard or preferred parts and evaluate the trade-offs

11. Review Program Parts Selection List and status of all non-standard parts identified

12. Determine if design meets contracts requirements governing size and weight to permit economical handling, loading, securing, transporting, and disassembly for shipment. Identify potential outsized and overweight items. Identify system/items defined as being hazardous and ensure compliance with hazardous materials regulations.

13. Review Transportability Analysis to determine that transportation conditions have been evaluated




https://afkm.wpafb.af.mil/ASPs/DocMan/DOCDisplay.asp?Filter=OO-AQ-SP-11&DocID=498559


See Checklist D-11


EXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:Established system allocated baseline

Updated Cost Analysis Requirements Description (CARD) based on the system allocated baselineUpdated program schedule including system and software critical path driversUpdated Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP)Updated Test and Evaluation Management Plan (TEMP)Updated System Engineering Plan (SEP)Acceptance of CDRLS due at PDR


14. Determine understanding of the background, purpose, requirements, and usage of Maintenance Data Collection, historical/status records and methods of providing maintenance, failure, reliability, maintainability data

15. Review plans for Work Unit Coding of the equipment16. Review logistics and provisioning planning to insure full understanding of scope of requirements to include provisioning requirements, GFP usage, and spare parts, and support during installation, checkout, and test

18. Review plans for maximum screening and usage of GFP, and extent plans have been implemented

19. Review status of the Technical Manual Publications Plan to include availability of technical manuals for validation and verification during DT&E testing

20. Evaluate the training system/simulator item development specifications


Updated risk assessment for SDD






3.36.1


3.38

Participate in CDR Capability Development Document (CDD)Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP)System Engineering PlanSystem Performance SpecificationSystem Allocated BaselineUpdated Cost Analysis Requirements DescriptionLife Cycle Cost AnalysisReliability Analysis

Test and Evaluation Management PlanSystem Engineering Plan (SEP)Successful completion of all PDR action items Applicable CDRLs



12. Ensure energy efficiency and alternate fuels are considered

Technical Design documentation (engineering drawings, preliminary technical orders; commercial manuals; preliminary materials, parts, and processes; analyses; reports; trade studies; logistics support analysis data; etc.

The CDR is a multi-disciplined technical review to ensure that the system under review can proceed into system fabrication, demonstration, and test; and can meet the stated performance requirements within cost (program budget), schedule (program schedule), risk, and other system constraints. For complex systems, the program manager may conduct a CDR for each subsystem or configuration item. These individual reviews would lead to an overall system CDR.

1. Maintenance Planning includes plans/concept for initial, transition and steady state organizational and depot level O&M support, warranties, CORE and SORAP status.

DOD Systems Engineering FundamentalsSystem Development and Demonstration

2. Review status of unresolved maintenance and maintenance data problems since PDR.

3. Has a process been implemented to assess achieved reliability, availability, and maintainability (RAM) performance by collection and analysis of user data?

System Engineering Critical Design Review

4. Has a Failure Reporting Analysis and Corrective Action System (FRACAS) been established and failures analyzed and trended for ILS visibility?

5. Review the updated life cycle cost estimate to ensure adequate hardware and software support is allocated.

Comprehensive CDR Checklist6. Review updated list of required support equipment and verify compatibility of proposed support equipment with the system maintenance concept

7. Verify maximum consideration of GFE SE and common parts (standard item with NSN should be first preference). Review GFE provisioning planning to ensure timely receipt or required items. Ensure SERD procedures in place.

Logistics Considerations

8. Review calibration and reliability predictions for SE. 9. Review spares planning to insure full understanding of scope of requirements to include provisioning requirements, GFP usage, and support during test and initial deployment


10. Have accepted sparing analysis and modeling tools been utilized and are the assumptions consistent with the supportability analysis and the prescribed maintenance concept?

11. Has a Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS) program been established and documented consistent with DoD policy.

AFMCI 23-103 Diminishing Manufacturing Sources & Material Shortages Program

13. Review technical manuals and technical data package availability to include support equipment and COTS manuals. Ensure data rights issues are addressed.

DoD 4140.1-R DoD Supply Chain Materiel Management RegulationChapter 3 section 6

14. Review status of the Technical Manual Publications Plan to include availability of technical manuals for certification (validation) and verification during DT&E testing








Para 3.3

See Checklist D-11

EXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:An established system product baselineThe status of the technical effort and design indicates OT success (operationally suitable and effective)The detailed design, as disclosed, will satisfy the CDD/CPD/ORDThe program schedule is executable within the anticipated cost and technical risksAn updated risk assessment for System Development and DemonstrationAn updated Cost Analysis Requirements Description (CARD) (or CARD-like document) based on the system product baseline

Updated requirements for RM&A are complete and unambiguously stated in the system or subsystem specificationsUpdated Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP)An updated Test and Evaluation StrategyAn updated System Engineering Plan (SEP)


15. Review plans for Work Unit Coding of the equipment16. Determine if design meets contracts requirements governing size and weight to permit economical handling, loading, securing, transporting, and disassembly for shipment. Identify potential outsized and overweight items. AFI 21-118 Improving Air and Space Equipment Reliability and MaintainabilityChapter 2

17. Where applicable, have Unique Identification requirements been incorporated?

18. Identify system/items defined as being hazardous and ensure compliance with hazardous materials regulations.

AFI 63-107 Integrated Product Support and Assessment

19. Has a program to eliminate ESOH hazards or manage the risk where the hazard cannot be avoided been established?

20. Has a Program Environmental, Safety and Health Evaluation (PESHE) been developed?

21. Review Transportability Analysis to determine that transportation conditions have been evaluated. Identify any equipment to be test loaded for air transportability of material in military aircraft.


22. Have potential PHS&T related problems been identified and are risk mitigation plans in place?

23. Has a Training Plan been approved? Does the plan address how courses and related materials and devices will be developed for training at each required level of maintenance?

24. Has the Manpower Estimate report been updated? (ACAT1 only)?

25. Is there a total breakout of number of personnel and Air Force Specialty Codes (AFSC) that are projected to support the system?

26. Does the Product Support Plan include analysis conducted to determine facility requirements? Is there a Facilities Requirements Document and a schedule to conduct Site Surveys?


Updated requirements for operations, maintenance, and training needs are complete and unambiguously stated in the system or subsystem specifications





3.39 Outputs from Critical Design Review





Prepare Documentation for Design Readiness Review (DRR)

The Design Readiness Review provides an opportunity for mid-phase assessment of design maturity. It is not as large as a Milestone Decision Review (does not require as much documentation as specified by 5000.2) but it is not a technical review either. They are usually Milestone Decision Authority (MDA)-led management oversight reviews intended to provide an assessment (cost, schedule, supportability, and performance) of a program's readiness to progress further through the acquisition life cycle. MDA can determine the form and content of the review consistent with entrance/exit criteria for the Systems Integration and Systems Demonstration phases.

1. Review the number of subsystem and system design reviews for successfully completing product support initiatives.

DoDI 5000.2 Operation of the Defense Acquisition System Paragraph 3.7.4Systems Development and Demonstration2. Review percentage of drawings completed

3. Review planned corrective actions for product support deficiencies

4. Assess the environment, safety and occupational health risks 5. Review the completed failure modes and effects analysis Independent Logistics Assessment (ILA) Handbook See Checklist D-116. Assess key product support system characteristics (include support equipment) and processes

8. Review estimate of system reliability based on demonstrated reliability rates; etc.


NOTE: There is no guidebook or list of mandatory criteria.

http://akss.dau.mil/dag/DoD5000.asp?view=document



3.43

Participate in Test Readiness Review (TRR) Test PlanTest and Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP)Initial Capabilities Document (ICD)(Draft) Capability Development Document (CDD)(Draft) System Engineering Plan (SEP)Support & Maintenance Concept & Technologies

DESCRIPTION:DESCRIPTION:A review of the test plan, including safety and facilities, to determine readiness to begin testing. CHECKLIST SUBTASKS:CHECKLIST SUBTASKS:TASKTASK SOURCE DOCUMENTATIONSOURCE DOCUMENTATION PHASEPHASE

11. Ensure Energy Efficiency and Alternate Fuels are considered. See Checklist D-11

EXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:Approved Readiness to Conduct TestUpdated/Approved Test Plan

1. Identify any Product Support (PS) KPPs within the test plan and ensure they are fully tested, analyzed, and assessed to meet acceptance criteria.

Defense Acquisition Guidebook, Chapter 9, Integrated Test and EvaluationTechnology Development / Phase A Concept Development

2. Identify opportunities to assess operational safety, suitability and effectiveness of the PS strategy and CONOPs.

3. Review PS readiness assessments, as possible.AFPD 99-1, Test and Evaluation ProcessSystem Development

and Demonstration

4. Review system logistics footprint assessments, as possible.

5. Review PS facility and infrastructure requirements assessments, as possible.



6. Review maintenance procedures assessments, as possible, to include technical manual development and data availability.

( Paragraphs: 2.3.4, 4.5.3, 4.5.3.4)

7. Review support equipment suitability (to include calibration requirements) and compatibility with system maintenance concept assessments, as possible.

8. Review on-equipment vs off-equipment maintenance tasks assessments, as possible.

9. Review system size and weight, permitting economical handling, loading, securing, transporting, and disassembling for shipment, to include handling hazardous materials assessments, as possible.

AFI 99-103, Capabilities Based Test and EvaluationOperations & Support / Phase D Build & Operations

10. Ensure test plan includes adequate funding for PS testing requirements, to include fee for service support and contracted logistics/maintenance support. Independent Logistics Assessment (ILA) Handbook

12. Assess status of Training Systems to ensure supportability requirements have been met







3.47 Design Readiness ReviewOperational Test PlanCapability Production Document



Update Product Support Strategy in LCMP (Increments, Performance Based Logistics (PBL), PPP, LOG Elements, etc.)

Existing Life Cycle Management Plan


1. Ensure points in checklist 3.18 are updated LCMP Guide System Development & Demonstration (System Demonstration)

2. Discuss demonstration of system affordability throughout the life cycle, optimal funding, and proper phasing for rapid acquisition


3. Review Cost as an Independent Variable (CAIV). Include any funding shortfalls and discuss current and planned cost reduction initiatives


4. Update discussion of Human Systems Integration (HSI) implications, constraints and issues.

AFI 63-107 Integrated Product Support Planning and Assessment (1.4.4.2)

5. Identify potential PBL product support integrators and providers Combined DT&E/OT&E/LFT&E

6. Refine life cycle logistics documents and analyses as a result of development and operational tests, and iterative systems engineering analyses

Configuration Mgmt

7. Review SEP to identify processes for development and updates for the Failure Modes, Effects & Criticality Analysis (FMECA) matrix, Failure Reporting, Analysis & Corrective Action System (FRACAS), and Trend Analysis for maturation purposes of the weapon system and its support system

Configuration Mgmt 2

8. Discuss secure and integrated information systems across industry and government that enable comprehensive product support reporting

Cost as an Independent Variable (CAIV)

9. Review the Capability Production Document (CPD) for System Maintenance/Support Profiles and Use Case Scenarios (Support Capability Packages); Reliability and Maintenance Rates; Support Environmental and Locations for Support; Support and Maintenance Effectiveness; Duration of Support

DoD Directive 5000.1 The Defense Acquisition System E1.17 - Performance-Based Logistics

10. Ensure sufficient coverage of product support elements. . Include Diminshing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages, Energy Efficiency, Alternate Fuels considerations, demilitarization, declassification and disposal.

DoD Supply Chain Material Management Regulation

11. Review the MDA for exit criteria Integrated Supply Chain Management


Interoperability



14. For Space systems refer to Acquisition Strategy per NSSA Policy 03-01

Life Cycle Cost Optimization

PBL: A PM's Product Support Guide











https://akss.dau.mil/dag/Guidebook/IG_c5.1.3.4.asp





See Checklists D-3, D-10EXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:Elements of Product SupportUpdated Life Cycle Management Plan

System Development & Demonstration (System Demonstration)

Product Support Strategy

Product Support Concepts

Product Support Strategy in the Acquisition Strategy

NSSA Policy 03-01


http://akss.dau.mil/dag/DoD5000.asp?view=document&rf=GuideBook%5CIG_c2.3.12.asp





TASK #TASK # PROCESS NAME:PROCESS NAME: ENTRANCE CRITERIA:ENTRANCE CRITERIA:Development testing reportsSystem SpecificationDesign-to/subsystem specs (Tier II)



a. Verify para 4.3.3.9.2b. Testc. Demonstration

d. Analysis

EXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:All supportability requirements have been verified in the FCA and SVR

FCA and SVR minutes

4.07A

Participate in the Functional Configuration Audit (FCA) and monitor corrective actions for supportability performance requirements.

Program supportability objectives (CDD, KPPs, LCMP, CDRLs)

The FCA verifies that all requirements established in the specifications, associated test plans, and related documents have been tested and that the item has passed the tests, or corrective actions has been initiated. The FCA forms the basis of the allocated baseline. It determines if the system produced is capable of meeting the technical performance requirements established in the specification. Reviews must be planned, managed, and followed up to be effective as an analysis and control tool. This may be done in conjunction with System Verification Review (SVR).

1. Invite Air Logistics Center (ALC) logistician System Engineering Fundamentals Guide, January 2001 System Development

& Demonstration

2. Obtain a good understanding of supportability requirement in the functional baseline.3. Understand all the verification methodology for those supportability requirements.

Defense Acquisition Guide (DAG)

ASC/EN Guide: Technical Reviews/Audits for Aeronautical Weapon Systems Acquisition

4. Ensure supportability requirements have been verified and discrepancies have been documented. 5. Follow-up to ensure action items are completed. Guide for FCA-PCA


All supportability requirements have been allocated in the design – to/subsystem specifications which become the allocation baseline.

http://www.dau.mil/pubs/pdf/SEFGuide%2001-01.pdf






3.48

Test Readiness Review completedLife Cycle Management PlanTest and Evaluation Master PlanConfiguration Management PlanDT&E, LFT&E and Operational AssessmentsProduct and Development Specifications

Contractor version of baseline data package



See Checklist E-1EXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:Updated Configuration Management PlanSVR, PRR, and/or FCA Minutes

Participate in Functional Configuration Audit (FCA), System Verification Review (SVR) and Production Readiness Review (PRR)

Work instructions, Process specifications, Detailed manufacturing assembly and test processes and Manufacturing test data sheets

Program supportability objectives (CDD, KPPs, LCMP, CDRLs)

SVR is a formal review conducted to verify that the actual item (which represents the production configuration) complies with the performance specification. (Note: The FCA can be done in parallel or can be replaced by the SVR)

PRR is a formal examination of a program to determine if the design is ready for production, production engineering, problems have been resolved, and the producer has accomplished adequate planning for the production phase.

1. Participate on the integrated product team Defense Acquisition Guidebook, Paragraphs 4.3.3.9.2/3System Development and Demonstration

2. Invite Air Logistics Center (ALC) logistician MIL-STD-973

3. Ensure designed-in RAM levels are not degraded MIL-HDBK-61A, Configuration Management Guidance

4. Obtain a good understanding of supportability requirement in the functional baseline.

ECSS Configuration and Data Management Plan

5. Understand all the verification methodology for those supportability requirements.

Guide for FCA-PCA

a. Verify ASC/EN Guide: Technical Reviews/Audits for Aeronautical Weapon Systems Acquisitionb. Testc. Demonstration

d. Analysis

6. Ensure supportability requirements have been verified and discrepancies have been documented. 7. Follow-up to ensure actions items are completed. ISO 15288 (for fee service)







http://wwwedms.redstone.army.mil/edrd/973.html


https://afkm.wpafb.af.mil/ASPs/DocMan/DOCDisplay.asp?Filter=OO-EN-MC-22&DocID=701472









TASK #TASK # PROCESS NAME:PROCESS NAME: ENTRANCE CRITERIA:ENTRANCE CRITERIA:Prepare Documentation for Milestone C Determination MS C is required

Capability Production DocumentInformation Support PlanTest and Evaluation Master Plan



SAMPLE

EXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:Milestone decision approved; full rate production decisionAll proper supporting documentation put in the official files

4.10

There are two types of decision points: milestone decisions and decision reviews. Each decision point results in a decision to initiate, continue, advance, or terminate a project or program work effort or phase. The review associated with each decision point typically addresses program progress and risk, affordability, program trade-offs, acquisition strategy updates, and the development of exit criteria for the next phase or effort. The Milestone Decision Authority approves the program structure, including the type and number of decision points, as part of the acquisition strategy. Milestone C authorizes entry into LRIP (for MDAPs and major systems), into production or procurement (for non-major systems that do not require LRIP) or into limited deployment in support of operational testing for MAIS programs or software-intensive systems with no production components.


Milestone C Documentation Production and Deployment / Phase B Preliminary Design/Phase C Complete Design & Build ApprovalStandard ASC Milestone Decision Process Guide



NSSA Policy 03-01





TASK #TASK # PROCESS NAME:PROCESS NAME:Accomplish Spares Provisioning Conference


The following resources will normally be used:Sample articles when specified in the Initial Provisioning Performance Specification (IPPS).Provisioning technical documentation/SUPPLEMENTAL data for provisioning (PTD/SDFP).Maintenance engineering analysis (MEA), and/or RLA, when a requirement of the contract.


7. Assure resolution of or action taken on all problem areas.

9. Prepare and distribute minutes.

EXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:Provisioning Office will update D220 based on changes during the Provisioning Conference.D220 generates a Supply Support Request (SSR) for Consumables to Defense Logistic Agency (DLA). D220 generates Required Provisioning Item Order (PIO) for Air Force Managed Items.Provisioning Conference minutesGenerate Non-consumable item material support request (NIMSR)

4.13.4

The provisioning conference provides for the Government to make item selection and assign technical and management codes (previously referred to within the Air force as a source coding conference).

Competent personnel with expert technical knowledge of the system/end article with regard to the design, reliability and maintenance characteristics of the system/end article or the portion being provisioned.

The following activities are accomplished/addressed during a provisioning conference:

1. Hold a closed Air Force meeting (similar to the familiarization meeting held during the guidance conference) before the start of the provisioning conference as required. Meeting chairperson may invite other government agencies such as DLA or have a separate government only meeting.2. Ensure the availability of adequate facilities, PTD, SDFP, qualified contractor personnel, and Repair Level Analysis (RLA) data, when applicable.

3. Assign Source Maintenance Recoverability (SMR) coding action and documentation.4. Refer problems that cannot be adequately resolved to the HQ AFMC /A4SI provisioning Policy Office with all pertinent facts for resolution with the appropriate staff.5. Ensure that all personnel are aware of the principle of the price challenge policy HQ AFMC direction. Refer all unresolved questions to the HQ AFMC /A4SM Provisioning Office for policy guidance.

6. Make sure official SMR codes are given to the contractor, through the Contracting Office, for publication in the IPB or the numerical index of the Illustrated Parts Breakdown (IPB) IAW MIL-M-38807 (USAF). Expendability Recoverability Reparability Category (ERRC) codes will not be included.

8. Make sure requirement for the Repairable Items List (RIL), including dates needed are given to the contractor through the Contracting Office.

10. When a Recoverable Item Breakdown (RIB) is sent to the Recoverable Item Inventory Manager (RIIM) ALC, the PTD is forwarded to the D155.


ENTRANCE CRITERIA:ENTRANCE CRITERIA:Spares Acquisition CLIN on Contract

PTD Has Been Loaded in D220Approved Provisioning Performance Schedule (PPS)


The following resources will normally be used:Sample articles when specified in the Initial Provisioning Performance Specification (IPPS).Provisioning technical documentation/SUPPLEMENTAL data for provisioning (PTD/SDFP).Maintenance engineering analysis (MEA), and/or RLA, when a requirement of the contract.


Fee for Service

EXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:Provisioning Office will update D220 based on changes during the Provisioning Conference.D220 generates a Supply Support Request (SSR) for Consumables to Defense Logistic Agency (DLA). D220 generates Required Provisioning Item Order (PIO) for Air Force Managed Items.Provisioning Conference minutesGenerate Non-consumable item material support request (NIMSR)

Nomenclature, Weapon System Designator Code (WSDC)Provisioning Technical Documentation (PTD) Has Been Screened

The provisioning conference provides for the Government to make item selection and assign technical and management codes (previously referred to within the Air force as a source coding conference).

Competent personnel with expert technical knowledge of the system/end article with regard to the design, reliability and maintenance characteristics of the system/end article or the portion being provisioned.

AFMCI 23-101 Air Force Provisioning Instruction, chapter 14System Development & Demonstration

TO 00-25-195 Source Maintenance Recoverability Code (SMR) Production and Deployment / Phase B Preliminary Design/Phase C Complete Design & Build ApprovalAFMCMAN 23-3 Cataloging and Standardization

ASME Y14.100 Engineering Drawing Practices


MIL-DTL-31000 Technical Data Packages



http://www.e-publishing.af.mil/shared/media/epubs/AFMCMAN23-3.pdf

http://catalog.asme.org/Codes/PrintBook/Y14100_2004_Drawing_Practices.cfm

http://www.pdsm.wpafb.af.mil/engdat/docs/Rev%20C/31000C.pdf



4.14

Program Transfer



May be accomplished during PMRs and Portfolio Reviews

Program transfer is an orderly, timely and efficient transfer of program management responsibility for all ACAT level programs to the sustainment portfolio at the most appropriate point in the program. AFI 63-101, indicates, “As a general rule, once a program nears completion of all acquisition activity at Milestone C, program offices will consider transferring program responsibility from the Program Executive Officer (PEO) to the appropriate ALC for sustainment.” Planning for sustainment (activities, schedule, resources, milestones, etc.) should occur early in the program life cycle and be documented and updated in the Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) or Acquisition Strategy. AFI 63-107, Integrated Product Support Planning and Assessment, requires the System Program Manager (SPM) to develop/maintain an LCMP that, “…makes visible to senior leadership all aspects of the program plan” including sustainment activities.

1. Ensure the tasks required by checklists 4.10 (Prepare Documentation for Milestone C), 4.22 (Participate in Site Activation Task Force), and 4.42 (Prepare Documentation for Full Rate Production) have been addressed.

2. Ensure a logistician is included on any Integrated Product Teams (IPTs), Program Management Reviews (PMRs), or Portfolio Reviews to confirm the system’s sustainment worthiness for transfer. Focus should be on programs due to transfer in next five years

3. Program transfer begins when the SPM (in collaboration with the System Support Manager (SSM) recommend programs to transfer to the PEO.

4. PEO & gaining Air Logistics Center (ALC)/CC will review and recommend transfer to the Service Acquisition Executive (SAE) & Air Force Materiel Command (AFMC)/CC based on:

Review of established criteria: (PEO Assessment Criteria, section 3.1.2 and Figure 3.4, Air Force Program Transfer Process Guide, 2006)

Sustainment Elements: Independent Logistics Analysis (ILA) Handbook tools may be used for evaluation of sustainment elements

Click on one of the sustainment elements below to access an ILA Handbook checklist

•Manpower•Personnel

•Maintenance•Supportability•Systems Engineering

https://asc-workspace.oh.afmc.af.mil/asc/77AESW1/Logistics/Processes/Program%20Transfer%20Information/Program_Transfer_Guide_v6_-_Oct_06_Bookmarked.doc#PEO_Assessment_Criteria

https://asc-workspace.oh.afmc.af.mil/asc/77AESW1/Logistics/Processes/Program%20Transfer%20Information/ILA%20Handbook.doc

https://asc-workspace.oh.afmc.af.mil/asc/77AESW1/Logistics/Processes/Program%20Transfer%20Information/ILA%20Handbook_Bookmarks.doc#Manpower

https://asc-workspace.oh.afmc.af.mil/asc/77AESW1/Logistics/Processes/Program%20Transfer%20Information/ILA%20Handbook_Bookmarks.doc#Personnel

https://asc-workspace.oh.afmc.af.mil/asc/77AESW1/Logistics/Processes/Program%20Transfer%20Information/ILA%20Handbook_Bookmarks.doc#Maintenance

https://asc-workspace.oh.afmc.af.mil/asc/77AESW1/Logistics/Processes/Program%20Transfer%20Information/ILA%20Handbook_Bookmarks.doc#Supportability

https://asc-workspace.oh.afmc.af.mil/asc/77AESW1/Logistics/Processes/Program%20Transfer%20Information/ILA%20Handbook_Bookmarks.doc#Systems_Engineering

6. SAE & AFMC/CC evaluate and approve/decline transfer

11. PEO and ALC/CC sign/approve Transfer Agreement.

EXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP)Program Management Directive (PMD)Transition Support Plan (TSP)Program Transitioned

•Data Management•Supply•Transportation•Configuration Management•Training

5. Ensure Program Objective Memorandum (POM) input is coordinated with the ALC for supportability requirements (i.e. manpower) specifically to include subsequent support after transfer.

7. Participate in update of the Program Management Directive (PMD)8. Participate in IPT activities for the development and negotiation of transfer agreement. Delivering Center will be IPT lead.9. Participate in IPT activities associated with the preparation of the Transition Support Plan (TSP)

10. TSP will be coordinated through product and logistics centers and submitted to PEO and ALC/CC for signature/approval.

If the TSP is not approved, or if the approval is delayed excessively, elevate to the SAE and the AFMC/CC for resolution.

12. Ensure all residual actions are tracked and accomplished per the Transfer Agreement.

https://asc-workspace.oh.afmc.af.mil/asc/77AESW1/Logistics/Processes/Program%20Transfer%20Information/ILA%20Handbook_Bookmarks.doc#Data_Management

https://asc-workspace.oh.afmc.af.mil/asc/77AESW1/Logistics/Processes/Program%20Transfer%20Information/ILA%20Handbook_Bookmarks.doc#Supply

https://asc-workspace.oh.afmc.af.mil/asc/77AESW1/Logistics/Processes/Program%20Transfer%20Information/ILA%20Handbook_Bookmarks.doc#Transportation

https://asc-workspace.oh.afmc.af.mil/asc/77AESW1/Logistics/Processes/Program%20Transfer%20Information/ILA%20Handbook_Bookmarks.doc#Configuration_Management

https://asc-workspace.oh.afmc.af.mil/asc/77AESW1/Logistics/Processes/Program%20Transfer%20Information/ILA%20Handbook_Bookmarks.doc#Training

https://asc-workspace.oh.afmc.af.mil/asc/77AESW1/Logistics/Processes/Program%20Transfer%20Information/Program_Transfer_Guide_v6_-_Oct_06_Bookmarked.doc#Transition_Support_Plan


ENTRANCE CRITERIA:ENTRANCE CRITERIA:Milestone C (completion of all acquisition activities)Initial Operating Capability (IOC)Full Rate Production (FRP)Site Activation Task Force (SATAF)Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP)



The entire document

Program transfer is an orderly, timely and efficient transfer of program management responsibility for all ACAT level programs to the sustainment portfolio at the most appropriate point in the program. AFI 63-101, indicates, “As a general rule, once a program nears completion of all acquisition activity at Milestone C, program offices will consider transferring program responsibility from the Program Executive Officer (PEO) to the appropriate ALC for sustainment.” Planning for sustainment (activities, schedule, resources, milestones, etc.) should occur early in the program life cycle and be documented and updated in the Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) or Acquisition Strategy. AFI 63-107, Integrated Product Support Planning and

, requires the System Program Manager (SPM) to develop/maintain an LCMP that, “…makes visible to senior ” including sustainment activities.

AFI63-101, Operations of Capabilities Based Acquisition System, Chapter 6, Section 6.6 System Development and Demonstration

AFI 63-107, Integrated Product Support Planning and Assessment,

Production & Deployment / Phase B Preliminary Design/Phase C Complete Design and Build Approval


NSSA Policy 03-01 for Space Programs


Use the entire document, see specifically Appendix D, Evaluation Criteria for Milestones and Full Rate Production (FRP) D-7 through D16

Air Force Program Transfer Guide Overall document on the program transfer process

ASC/ACE Program Transfer Process Briefing, Sept 2007



https://akss.dau.mil/dag/DoD5000.asp?view=document&doc=2




https://asc-workspace.oh.afmc.af.mil/asc/77aesw1/Logistics/Processes/Forms/AllItems.aspx?RootFolder=%2Fasc%2F77AESW1%2FLogistics%2FProcesses%2FProgram%20Transfer%20Information&View=%7B893F489F%2D5853%2D4635%2D818C%2D9C1FE63BD33A%7D

(AFI 63-101, par 2.2.7)

EXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP)Program Management Directive (PMD)Transition Support Plan (TSP)Program Transitioned

Program Management Directive (PMD)



4.22

Conduct Site Activation Task Force (SATAF) CE / Site / Project Office MOAsSystem Implementation Plan (SIP)Site Validated RequirementsFacilities Requirement PlanBeddown PlanSite Floor PlansSystem Engineering Plan (SEP)System Security PlanSystem Master Equipment Matrix



1. Ensure logistician is part of the team.

2. Participate in operational base survey.

3. Validate logistics requirements to develop the site design.

6. Work logistics action items with mitigation plan.

8. Participate in SATAF out brief

See Checklist D-9EXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:Update SIP and SEPSATAF out brief

This procedure identifies the steps necessary to migrate or install a new system at the designated sites in accordance with the validated requirements, approved drawings and floor plans, and associated documentation (Plans/Policies). It is assumed that the infrastructure requirements performed by civil engineering (or contractor) have been satisfied. Activities may include installation, testing, and coordination with other infrastructure service agencies such as Defense Information Systems Agency.

AFI 10-503, Base Unit Beddown ProgramProduction and Deployment / Phase B Preliminary Design/Phase C Complete Design & Build Approval

AFI 10-501, Program Action Directives (PAD) and Programming Plans (PPlan),

4. Coordinate with site and base logistician on required assets (support equipment, technical orders, spares/training, etc).

5. Ensure all allied support (base level) is completed (such as infrastructure, communications, electrical power, and physical security requirements) in accordance with the associated Memorandums of Agreement (MOA)s

AFI 16-403, Updating the USAF Program Installations, Units, and Priorities and Movement of Air Force Units

7. Plan and coordinate training, technical orders, support equipment, supply support activities, Facilities, maintenance planning, manpower and personnel, supportability, transportation, systems engineering.

AFI 32-9005, Real Property Accountability and Reporting

Fielding Community of Practice






https://afkm.wpafb.af.mil/ASPs/CoP/OpenCoP.asp?Filter=OO-AQ-MC-04



4.27

Test PlanTest and Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP)Initial Capabilities Document (ICD)(Draft) Capability Development Document (CDD)(Draft) System Engineering Plan (SEP)Support & Maintenance Concept & Technologies

DESCRIPTION:DESCRIPTION:A review of the test plan, including safety and facilities, to determine readiness to begin testing. CHECKLIST SUBTASKS:CHECKLIST SUBTASKS:TASKTASK SOURCE DOCUMENTATIONSOURCE DOCUMENTATION PHASEPHASE

See Checklist D-11

EXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:Approved Readiness to Conduct TestUpdated/Approved Test Plan

Participate in Operational Test Readiness Review (OTRR)

1. Identify any Product Support (PS) KPPs within the test plan and ensure they are fully tested, analyzed, and assessed to meet acceptance criteria.

Defense Acquisition Guidebook, Chapter 9, Integrated Test and EvaluationSystem Development and Demonstration

2. Review operational safety, suitability and effectiveness of the PS strategy and CONOPs assessments, as possible.

3. Review PS readiness assessments, as possible. AFPD 99-1, Test and Evaluation ProcessProduction and Deployment / Phase B Preliminary Design/Phase C Complete Design & Build Approval

4. Review system logistics footprint assessments, as possible.

5. Review PS facility and infrastructure requirements assessments, as possible.


6. Review maintenance procedures assessments, as possible, to include technical manual development and data availability.

7. Review support equipment suitability (to include calibration requirements) and compatibility with system maintenance concept assessments, as possible.


8. Review on-equipment vs off-equipment maintenance tasks assessments, as possible.

9. Review system size and weight, permitting economical handling, loading, securing, transporting, and disassembling for shipment, to include handling hazardous materials assessments, as possible.


10. Ensure test plan includes adequate funding for PS testing requirements, to include fee for service support and contracted logistics/maintenance support. Independent Logistics Assessment (ILA) Handbook








4.31

Participate in Physical Configuration Audit (PCA)

No significant manufacturing risksManufacturing processes under controlApproved ICD (if Milestone C is program initiation)Approved Capability Production Document (CPD)



See Checklist E-1

Acceptable performance in development, test and evaluation and operational assessment; mature software capability

Acceptable interoperability; acceptable operational supportability

Compliance with the DoD Strategic Plan; and demonstration that the system is affordable throughout the life cycle, optimally funded, and properly phased for rapid acquisition.

CPD reflects the operational requirements resulting from SDD and details the performance expected of the production system.

A formal audit that establishes the product baseline as reflected in an early production configuration item. The PCA is conducted around the time of the full rate production decision and examines the actual configuration of an item being produced. It verifies that the related design documentation matches the item as specified in the contract. In addition to the standard practice of assuring product verification, the PCA confirms that the manufacturing processes, quality control system, measurement and test equipment, and training are adequately planned, tracked, and controlled. The PCA validates many of the supporting processes used by the contractor in the production of the item and verifies other elements of the item that may have been impacted/redesigned after completion of the System Verification Review (SVR).

A PCA is normally conducted when the government plans to control the detail design of the item it is acquiring via the Technical Data Package. When the government does not plan to exercise such control or purchase the item's Technical Data Package (e.g., performance based procurement) the contractor should conduct an internal PCA to define the starting point for controlling the detail design of the item and establishing a product baseline. The PCA is complete when the design and manufacturing documentation match the item as specified in the contract. If the PCA was not conducted prior to the full rate production decision, it should be performed as soon as production systems are available.

1. Review drawing for accuracy and compliance with contract requirements. Assess technical documentation for accuracy in the technical orders/manuals

Defense Acquisition Guidebook Production and Deployment / Phase B Preliminary Design/Phase C Complete Design & Build Approval

a. Drawing number match the latest released drawing

b. Drawing revision letter match the drawing revision letter listed on the build paper

ASC/EN Guide: Technical Reviews/Audits for Aeronautical Weapon System Acquisition

c. Review build paper for quality assurance stampd. Review list of materials on the build paper and match the materials on the drawing

ASC Configuration Management Processes Guide

e. Ensure nomenclature descriptions, part numbers and serial numbers on the drawings are listed on the build paperf. Ensure special instructions and processes on the drawings are listed on the build paper to include dimensions, tolerances, finishes, etc.

MIL-HDBK-61A, Configuration Management Guidance

g. Review drawings for all approved changes listed on the drawings/build paper and incorporated into the hardware

2. Review drawings and match to the hardware for approved nomenclature between the hardware and drawing

3. Review the Program Parts Selection List (PPSL) and ensure the list match the hardware and drawings

4. Define which parts will be provisioned. If so, ensure the test data that is essential to manufacturing is included on, or furnished with the drawings. Independent Logistics Assessment (ILA) Handbook

5. Review documentation to ensure the configuration before and after qualification testing is available to include any changes made since qualification testing (e.g., engineering change orders).






EXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:Established production baselineUpdated CPD, TEMP, PESHE, LCMP, and SEP as requiredInputs to Cost/Manpower estimate FCA/PCA Certificate of Completion


6. Review documentation to ensure changes made since the last audit or drawing review (e.g., engineering change orders) are maintained.


4.42 Determination that FRP Decision is required



IOC – FRP Decision

(All IT-including NSS)(Table E4.T1)

7. Acquisition Program Baseline

10. Interoperability Certification


Prepare Documentation for Full Rate Production (FRP) Decision

The Logistician should review and make input to the following documents required by statute or regulation before Milestone Decision can be sought and rendered

1. Post-Deployment Performance Review 5 U.S.C. 306

2. CCA Compliance 15 U.S.C. 644(e)(2)

3. Programmatic Environment Safety and Occupational Health Evaluation (PESHE)(including National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) compliance schedule)

40 U.S.C. Subtitle III Sec. 8088, Pub.L. 107-248 (or successor appropriations act provision)

4. Selected Acquisition Report (MDAPs only)(MS B and annually thereafter)5. Independent Cost Estimate (CAIG) and Manpower Estimate (reviewed by OUSD(P&R))(N/A for AISs, MDAPs only)

42 U.S.C. 4321

6. LFT&E Report10 U.S.C. 2432

8. Acquisition Strategy9. Analysis of Alternatives (for MAIS, MS B or equivalent) 10 U.S.C. 2434

11. Economic Analysis (MAIS only)(MS B or equivalent) 10 U.S.C. 236612. Component Cost Analysis (mandatory of MAIS anytime an economic analysis is required, either by statute or by the MDA, as requested by CAE for MDAP)

NSSA Policy 03-01

13. Cost Analysis Requirements Description (MDAPs and MAIS acquisition programs only)(for MAIS, anytime an economic analysis is required either by statute or by the MDA)(CARDs shall be prepared according to the procedures specified in DoD Instruction 5000.2)

10 U.S.C. 2435

14. Test and Evaluation Master Plan 10 U.S.C. 239915. Operational Test Agency Report of Operational Test and Evaluation Results

DoD Directive 5000.1 The Defense Acquisition System

16. Acquisition Decision MemorandumDoD Instruction 5000.2 Operation of the Defense Acquisition System


http://straylight.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode15/usc_sec_15_00000644----000-.html#e_2%20

http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=107_cong_public_laws&docid=f:publ248.107

http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/42/4321.html








http://akss.dau.mil/dag/DoD5002/DoD5002-3.10.asp#3.10





4.42.1

Participate in Foreign Military Sales (FMS) Activities (if applicable)

The Foreign Military Sales (FMS) Program is that part of Security Assistance authorized by the Arms Export Control Act and conducted using formal contracts or agreements between the Government and an authorized foreign country. These contracts, called Letters of Offer and Acceptance (LOAs), provide for the sale of defense articles and/or defense services (to include training) usually from DoD.

1. Respond to request for assistance in development of Foreign Military Sales requirement. The program office will receive a request from the SAF/IA Desk Officer or the AFSAC Command Country Manager (CCM) to provide assistance to a foreign government wishing to procure capabilities through the FMS process. Per DoD5105.38-M, Table C5.T2., all requests must come through SAF/IA and/or AFSAC.

a. The Program Manager must determine if resources are available to support the requested effort.

b. If additional resources are needed, communicate with SAF/IA or AFSAC.c. If total resources needed for a Pre-LOA effort exceeds ½ man-year, or $25,000, inform SAF/IA and AFSAC CCM for potential development of LOA Support Case funded by the foreign government, or waiver.

d. Funding for Pre-LOA travel must be coordinated through the center International Programs Office (IPO).

2. Perform Site Survey or other case planning to definitize foreign government requirements. If the foreign government is new to Foreign Military Sales or is wanting to acquire a system new to their inventory a Site Survey may be necessary to develop a program baseline. This effort is funded by the foreign government via a Letter of Offer and Acceptance (LOA), either written to specifically fund manpower (USG and contractor) and travel, or via recoupment through a system sale LOA. General case planning of lesser extent may be funded by FMS Administrative Funds.

a. Form Site Survey Team or informal team.b. Perform a review/survey covering physical, logistical, training, information security, and technical assessments, as necessary.

c. Prepare a report and/or brief the potential FMS purchaser whether Site Survey or informal review.

d. If a formal Site Survey, prepare quarterly summary report for Congress, as directed by SAF/IA.

3. Prepare Price and Availability (P&A) data. P&A data are rough order of magnitude. If the development of the response requires preparation of reports or other documentation, or travel to meetings, it does not qualify as ROM/P&A.

a. Receive validated P&A request from SAF/IA or AFSAC

b. Using available information, including standard Air Force factors and formulas, formulate P&A.c. Include standard disclaimer on P&A response stating the data provided is to be used for planning purposes only.

4. Prepare LOA Data (LOAD). The Letter of Offer and Acceptance is a formal, binding document between the USG and the foreign government utilizing the Foreign Military Sales (FMS) system. The LOR is validated by the Command Country Manager at AFSAC who then passes the LOR to the Case Manager who requests formal, detailed information from the Program Office. This LOA Data (or LOAD) generally includes pricing for items being acquired and USG personnel to implement the program, schedules, Sole Source arrangements, services being acquired through contracts, Technical Data, training, testing, source of supply, etc. The request for LOAD is accomplished through the Defense Security Assistance Management System (DSAMS).

a. Receive DSAMS tasking from Center IPO to prepare LOADb. Review LOR to ensure information is sufficient to develop valid and accurate LOAD estimates.

c. If information in the LOR is not sufficient, request additional information via the Case Manager

d. Develop LOAD to include line item descriptions and notes, estimated delivery schedules, program milestones, payment schedules, and manpower and associated cost required to execute the case and all other required information.

e. Complete LOAD tasking within 30 calendar days of the tasking date via DSAMS.f. If LOAD development cannot be completed by the due date the preparing office must request an extension from the Case Manager, providing justification.

g. Review LOAD through internal Program Office and IPO process

h. Complete LOAD tasking via DSAMS to Center IPO5. Prepare FMS Manpower Data. During the development of an LOA the Program Manager, in conjunction with the Case Manager, may determine that the execution of the case requires dedicated manpower and personnel resources. Manpower and personnel resources are managed by a cooperative process involving SAF/IAPX and the MAJCOM Manpower and Organization Office. FMS manpower and personnel requirements must be categorized based on the duties performed. All case funded manpower requirements must be documented by the development of a Manpower Requirements Package (MRP) or Manpower Change Notice (MCN). A Manpower and Travel Data Sheet (MTDS) is mandated by the Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) and must accompany all LOAs requiring case funded manpower or case funded travel.

EXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:Available resources are in place or are provided via AFSAC or SAF/IASite Survey ReportPrice & Availability DataLOADFMS Manpower DataLetter of Offer and Assistance


ENTRANCE CRITERIA:ENTRANCE CRITERIA:Foreign Government Letter of Request (LOR)



C5.T6., Row #1

Chapter 3

C5.T6., Row #2AFSAC Interim Policy, 29 Apr 04

C5.T6., Row #3 and

Tasking from Undersecretary of Defense for International Affairs (SAF/IA) or the Air Force Security Assistance Center (AFSAC)

The Foreign Military Sales (FMS) Program is that part of Security Assistance authorized by the Arms Export Control Act and conducted using formal contracts or agreements between the Government and an authorized foreign country. These contracts, called Letters of Offer and Acceptance (LOAs), provide for the sale of defense articles and/or defense services (to

DoD 5105.38-M Security Assistance Management Manual


AFMAN 16-101 International Affairs and Security Assistance Management


DoD 5105.38-M

AFMAN 16-101 Chapter 3

DoD5105.38-M

http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/html/510538m.htm

http://www.e-publishing.af.mil/shared/media/epubs/AFMAN16-101.pdf




AFMAN 16-101, Chapter 3

Para 4.5.3.3.

Para 4.5.3.1.

AFMAN 16-101, Chapter 3 (Para 3.3.4.)

AFMAN 16-101, Chapter 3 (Para 3.4.1.)

AFMAN 16-101, Para 4.4.2.1

AFMAN 16-101, Para 4.4.2.2

AFMAN 16-101, Para 4.4.2.3.1

AFMAN 16-101

AFMAN 16-101

AFMAN 16-101, Para 4.5.3.1.









EXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:Available resources are in place or are provided via AFSAC or SAF/IASite Survey ReportPrice & Availability DataLOADFMS Manpower DataLetter of Offer and Assistance

AFMAN 16-101, Para’s 4.5.2., 4.5.4. through 4.5.8., and 4.5.10. (with all sub-para’s, as applicable)

AFMAN 16-101, Para 4.5.3.4.

AFMAN 16-101, Para 4.5.3.5.

AFMAN 16-101, Para 4.5.11.1.

AFMAN 16-101, Para 4.5.3.3.











5.06.1


TASK #TASK # PROCESS NAME:PROCESS NAME:Equipment Specialist Checklist


Equipment/Material Identification Equipment/Material Control Equipment/Material Status Accounting Equipment/Material Verification and Audit Equipment/Material Data ManagementCHECKLIST SUBTASKS:CHECKLIST SUBTASKS:TASKTASK

Installation DrawingsMaster Equipment List

Equipment/Material Spares

Equipment/Material Support EquipmentEquipment/Material Calibration

EXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:Identify Equipment supportability Issues (EC Checklist)Verified EC incorporated in all affected items with appropriate documentsStatus Equipment accounting data base appropriate to each phase

6.02.1

The purpose of the Equipment Specialist is to assist in planning for and implementing effective DoD equipment management activities and practices during all life cycle phases of defense systems and configuration/non-configured items. It supports acquisition based on performance specifications, and the use of industry standards and methods to the greatest practicable extent throughout all phases of the lifecycle from concept exploration to disposition and disposal. Activities and practices include:

1. Understand MIL-HDBK-61A, local and contractor Equipment Control process.

2. Become a participating member of the EC and Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS) teams.

3. Review proposed changes for equipment considerations and impacts (i.e. ILS elements, Facility, and Support Equipment)

4. Initiate actions to ensure supportability considerations are implemented as required

5. Follow local exhibit management, storage, processing, and disposal procedures

6. Make appropriate planning and control to system documentation i.e;

Equipment/Material Technical data (Non-configured Drawings, TO, Data, etc.)

Equipment Management-competent contractor baseEquipment Management process performance measured & continuously improvedLesson learnedEC Recommendations and Disposition


ENTRANCE CRITERIA:ENTRANCE CRITERIA:Equipment List (Installation and non-configured items)

Government Furnished Property (GFP) Government Furnished Equipment (GFE)Support Equipment (SE)

Material ListUnique Tooling

Unique Test EquipmentSoftware/Hardware support equipment

(Hardware/Software/Firmware/Installation Equipment)DESCRIPTION:DESCRIPTION:

Equipment/Material Identification Equipment/Material Control Equipment/Material Status Accounting Equipment/Material Verification and Audit Equipment/Material Data ManagementCHECKLIST SUBTASKS:CHECKLIST SUBTASKS:

SOURCE DOCUMENTATIONSOURCE DOCUMENTATION PHASEPHASE

System Design

System Development

Click on “Standards”

EXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:Identify Equipment supportability Issues (EC Checklist)Verified EC incorporated in all affected items with appropriate documentsStatus Equipment accounting data base appropriate to each phase

Unique Facility Equipment (Uninterruptible Power Supply, Generators, Filter, etc.)

The purpose of the Equipment Specialist is to assist in planning for and implementing effective DoD equipment management activities and practices during all life cycle phases of defense systems and configuration/non-configured items. It supports acquisition based on performance specifications, and the use of industry standards and methods to the greatest practicable extent throughout all phases of the lifecycle from concept exploration to disposition and disposal. Activities and practices

AFI 63-107, Integrated Product Support Planning & Assessment

Concept Refinement / Pre KDP-A Concept StudiesAFPD 20-5, Air Force Product

Support Planning & Management

DoDI 5000.2, Operation of the Defense Acquisition System

MIL-HDBK-61A, Configuration Management GuidanceProduction and Deployment / Phase B Preliminary Design/Phase C Complete Design & Build Approval


ANSI/EIA 649A Operations & Support / Phase D Build & Operations

http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/i50002_051203/i50002p.pdf




Equipment Management-competent contractor baseEquipment Management process performance measured & continuously improvedLesson learned

TASK #TASK # PROCESS NAME:PROCESS NAME: ENTRANCE CRITERIA:ENTRANCE CRITERIA:6.04 Manage Information & Communication Activities Requirement for Logistics IT System(s)



See Checklist D-2, D-3, D-12 F-1

EXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:Disposition of CSRD/Baseline Change Requests (BCR) directed towards the affected IT systems.

The logistics information systems are critical to providing acquisition logisticians with rapid, current, and complete logistics information for making informed command and control decisions.

1) Obtain an Information System Management Tool (ISMT) account

ISMT Web Site: https://www.ismt.wpafb.af.mil/Systems Development

2) Submit a Communications and Information Systems Requirements Document (CSRD) via ISMT Requirements Document Tracking Module (RDTM)


3) Provide support as required throughout the Logistics IT Requirements Management Process.

AFI 33-103 Requirements Development and Processing

AFMC Requirements Management Plan located on the AFMC/A4N CoP

Integrated Requirements Review Board (IRRB) Minutes (Posted monthly on the AFMC/A4N CoP)



https://www.ismt.wpafb.af.mil/


https://afkm.wpafb.af.mil/ASPs/docman/DOCMain.asp?Tab=0&FolderID=OO-LG-MC-01-10&Filter=OO-LG-MC-01


TASK #TASK # PROCESS NAME:PROCESS NAME: ENTRANCE CRITERIA:ENTRANCE CRITERIA:Managing Technical Order (TO) Sustainment Formal Technical Orders and supporting data

Technical Order Management Plan (TOMP)Maintenance StrategyProduct Support StrategyTransition Support Plan (TSP)



5. Stock and store TOs IAW TO 00-5-3

(T33-40 R 03.00)


6.08.1

Technical Orders must be sustained and maintained to ensure currency, completeness and accuracy for support of affected equipment. Sustainment includes: updating, numbering, indexing, publication (editing & printing), stocking, and delivery to the user. The organization or individual assigned TO sustainment responsibility is called the Technical Order Manager. The TO content is managed by the equipment specialist (ES) or engineer responsible for the equipment covered by the TO. This individual is known as the Technical Content Manager (TCM). This checklist gives instructions on the processes used to maintain a technical order from TO formalization to equipment disposal.

1. Number and index TOs. See TO Numbering & Indexing Process Flow.

TO 00-5-3 Air Force Technical Manual Acquisition ProcessProduction and Deployment / Phase B Preliminary Design/Phase C Complete Design & Build Approval

Develop TO strategy2. Manage the correction and improvement of TOs through the TO update process. See TO Improvement Process Flow.

Technical Order Contract Requirements

TO Delivery Requirements3. Manage the verification process for new TOs and TO updates. See TO 00-5-3 and the TOVP.

TM-86-01

Generic TOMP4. Publish TOs and updates. Includes developing, formatting, pre-pub review and printing. See TO Publishing Process Flow TO Verification Planning

TO Verification

Generic TOVPManage TO Improvement System

6. Distribute TOs IAW validated orders received through the TO Management System (JCALS, soon to be replaced by ETIMS). Ensure a digital copy is provided to the Air Force TO Archives. See TO 00-5-3.

TO 00-5-1 Air Force Technical Order SystemOperations & Support / Phase D Build & Operations

AFRIMS 7. Develop TO budget inputs based on the Comprehensive Air Force Technical Order Plan (CAFTOP). See TO 00-5-3.

TO Improvement Process Flow8. Evaluate and approve Commercial Off-The-Shelf (COTS) manuals for equipment support as required. See MIL-PRF- 32216

TO Numbering & Indexing Process Flow

TO Publishing Process Flow9. Review and rescind TOs when no longer required. See TO 00-5-3.

AFI 61-204 Disseminating Scientific and Technical Information


AFI 21-303 Technical Orders


MIL-PRF-32216 Evaluation of Commercial Off-the-Shelf (COTS) Manuals and Preparation of Supplemental Data









http://www.pdsm.wpafb.af.mil/toprac/appdx-c.doc


http://www.pdsm.wpafb.af.mil/iitos/Sample_Files/Change2.pdf

https://afrims.amc.af.mil/rds_search_act.cfm









Sustainment of quality TOs that satisfy the needs of the users Disposal of Technical Orders

TASK #TASK # PROCESS NAME:PROCESS NAME: ENTRANCE CRITERIA:ENTRANCE CRITERIA:Time Compliance Technical Order (TCTO) Process Configuration Control Board (CCB) approved:

Technical Order Management Plan (TOMP)

Maintenance StrategyProduct Support Strategy



9.01.1

o Engineering Change Request or Order o Engineering Change Proposal (ECP)o Engineering Change Notice (ECN)

Technical Manual Contract Requirements (TMCR) Document, TM-86-01

TCTOs shall be used to document all permanent modifications, update changes and retrofit changes to standard Air Force (AF) systems and commodities. TCTOs are authorized by TO 00-5-1. They provide instructions for modifying military systems or commodities within specified time limits, initiate special ‘‘one time’’ inspections, or impose temporary restrictions on systems or commodities. This checklist gives instructions on the TCTO process used to maintain and update equipment configuration.

1. Initiate TCTO package. (AFMC Forms 873, 874, 875 and AFTO Form 82). Ensure funding has been provided by the Configuration Control Board (CCB)

Technical Order Contract RequirementsProduction and Deployment / Phase B Preliminary Design/Phase C Complete Design & Build Approval

2. Obtain TCTO number from JCALS / ETIMS, assign data code number (provided by the numbering specialist @ OC-ALC) and establish a Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS) record.

Generic TOMP

3. Develop formal or interim TCTO IAW TO 00-5-15, 00-5-1, AFMCI 21-302 and MIL-PRF-38804.

TM-86-01

4. If required, provide advanced notifications of Interim TCTO IAW AFMCI 21-302.

TO 00-5-1 Air Force Technical Order System

5. Develop TO updates as required to document TCTO “before” and “after” data. 6. Develop and number TCTO Kits as required by the complete kit concept (TO 00-5-15)

AFI 61-204 Disseminating Scientific and Technical Information

7. Perform TCTO verification (kit proofing) of the TCTO, any applicable TO updates and the TCTO kit.

8. Publish and distribute formal or interim TCTO, TO updates and TCTO kit concurrently to meet compliance period schedules.


9. Rescind TCTO after compliance or upon reaching the rescission date. Update TOs to remove “before” data.10. Update REMIS and JCALS records as necessary AFI 21-303 Technical Orders


Operations & Support / Phase D Build & OperationsTO 00-5-15 Air Force Time Compliance Technical Order Process

TCTO Development Flow Chart

MIL-PRF-38804 Performance Specification Time Compliance Technical Orders - Preparation

AFMCI 21-302 Processing Interim Technical Orders (ITO) and Rapid Action Changes (RAC)




http://www.pdsm.wpafb.af.mil/iitos/Sample_Files/Change2.pdf







http://www.ide.wpafb.af.mil/tmss/pdf/sp38804C.pdf


EXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:Completion of modification to all affected equipmentRescission of TCTO

TASK #TASK # PROCESS NAME:PROCESS NAME: ENTRANCE CRITERIA:ENTRANCE CRITERIA:Provide Support Equipment Disposition Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP)

Program Established (PMD)DESCRIPTION:DESCRIPTION:

Disposal of Equipment

CHECKLIST SUBTASKS:CHECKLIST SUBTASKS:

TASKTASK SOURCE DOCUMENTATIONSOURCE DOCUMENTATION PHASEPHASE

1. Ensure points for Checklist 2.05 are updated



4. Determine reason for disposal

5. Coordinate with item managers for shipping instructions

6. Dispose of equipment according to Item manager instructions

Paragraph 1

Chapter 2

Browse all appendices

EXIT CRITERIA:EXIT CRITERIA:Approved Integrated Risk Assessment, POE or other cost estimate as described in AFI 63-107.Documentation of the source data for the POE product support elements.Updated Life Cycle Mgmt Plan (LCMP)

10.05.1

AFI 63-107, Integrated Product Support Planning and AssessmentOperations & Support / Phase D Build & Operations



The first part of the documents explains the Integrated Logistics Assessment (ILA) process. Use the checklist within your program acquisition phase.

Program Transfer Process Guide

Overview document on the program transfer process.

AFMC Guide to the Defense Depot Maintenance Council Cost Comparability Handbook.




USAF Supply Manual AFMAN 23-110, Vol II Part 2, Chapter 22









a and s processes matrix 1 mar 08

Documents

projected

diminishing

defense planning

suspense tracking

engineering

deliver training

system supportability

defense logistics