97-709-1-pb
DESCRIPTION
technical paperTRANSCRIPT
Journal of Rehabilitation Robotics, 2013, 1, 93-98 93
E-ISSN: 2308-8354/13 © 2013 Synergy Publishers
Estimation of Forces and Moments of Lower Limb Joints from Kinematics Data and Inertial Properties of the Body by Using Inverse Dynamics Technique
Subhra Chowdhury and Neelesh Kumar*
Biomedical Instrumentation Unit, CSIR-CSIO, Sector 30-C, Chandigarh-160030, India
Abstract: In this paper, the forces and its moments acting on hip, knee & ankle joints of the body have been estimated with the help of kinetic models for better biomechanics understanding of human gait. This helps in accurate measurement of segmental masses, acceleration, joint centers and moment of inertia acting at various joints. Free Body
Diagram (FBD) and Link Segment Model (LSM) are used for computing forces & moments using Inverse Dynamics (ID) technique. Available lower limb walking model is limited in terms of number of joint forces and moments are analyzed; so, the improved biomechanical model for kinetic analysis of human walk involving lower limb joints & muscles is
proposed which estimate the forces acting on the hip joint, knee joint & ankle joints. This was also performed to understand the cause of deviation in any movement by estimating the patterns of forces acting on lower limb joints. Result analysis provides input parameter for the development of prosthetic foot design. by informing the force and
moment values of lower limb joints. This analysis will also help for quantification of lower limb prosthetics.
Keywords: Lower limb prosthesis, Moment, Inverse dynamics, Free body diagram, Link segment model.
1. INTRODUCTION
Biomechanical modeling uses inverse dynamics
technique to compute kinetic and kinematic variables
such as moment, ground reaction forces, accelerations
etc. Dynamic measurement of these variables is a
complex task which inducts inaccuracies. Estimation of
ground reaction forces and moment of forces of lower
limb joints is possible when full kinematic description
and inertial properties are available. Kinetic models are
used to describe forces and moment of forces
associated with linear and angular acceleration acting
on the lower limb joints and muscles which includes
both external forces and internal forces.
Human Gait modeling involves dynamic locomotive
model to predict the forces and moments at lower limb
joints. These ID equations were derived using the free-
body diagram and using inverse dynamics [1]. A
mathematical model for the dynamics of human
locomotion was proposed. Using moment histories, a
typical gait pattern can be demonstrated [2]. The total
moment of force values of ankle, knee, and hip joint
can support the body during stance when combined
together. The resultant moment was defined as the
addition of moment of knee joint and the subtraction of
moment of hip and ankle joint [3]. To estimate the force
and moment of lower limb joint muscles, a computer
model was used to simulate the effects of joint
*Address correspondence to this author at the Biomedical Instrumentation Unit, CSIR-CSIO, Sector 30-C, Chandigarh-160030, India; Tel: 91-172-2637165; Fax: 91-172-2637165; E-mail: [email protected]
replacement [4]. The kinematic data were obtained in
X, Y, and Z direction. A model was used to control the
whole body balance during human walking. It assessed
the effects of forces, acceleration & joint moments
which are acting on foot & hip but the balance of trunk
& swing leg was maintained by active hip abduction
moment [5, 6]. Human gait is a dynamic process of
transferring body weight without loss of equilibrium
from one place to another and lower limb prosthesis
can mimic the natural load bearing process which is an
integral part to share load bearing for locomotion [7].
The dynamic equations of motion were used to
calculate the proximal end forces and moments from
the distal end forces and moments for each body
segment. The method started at the foot and continued
up the limb [8]. Motion is caused by the imbalances of
the internal and external forces and moments at joints
[9]. Once the forces and concentrated joint moments
are determined, the contribution of each individual
muscle can be approximated. Modeling also permits
the study of motions in response to applied forces [10].
Direct dynamic modeling is a difficult task and the
process involves imposing forces on the system and
differential equations [11]. The method of determination
of forces and moments at each lower limb joint can be
performed by simple repetition of the free body model
of each segment [12]. Kinematic and kinetic patterns
were examined to understand variations and their
cause and effect relationships. Kinetic force pattern
variability was high for the hip and knee joints [13].
Force variability between subjects was considerable
with variations in cadence [14]. Walking is the most
convenient way to travel short distances and the heel is
94 Journal of Rehabilitation Robotics, 2013, Vol. 1, No. 2 Chowdhury and Kumar
the first part of the foot to touch the ground in walking;
therefore they play an important role in between the
body and ground during walking [15]. The study of
human gait is broadly classified into kinematics (i.e.,
the study of the motion of bodies with respect to time,
displacement and velocity either in a straight line or in a
rotary direction) and kinetics. The study of the forces
associated with motion and forces resulting from
motion are known as kinetics. The study of kinetics of
human movement plays an important role because it
allows us to gain the basic mechanics of movement. It
is useful for finding the cause of deviation of any
movement by estimating various patterns of the forces
and explains how to calculate force and moment of
forces using kinematic and inertial properties. Here the
reaction forces and muscle moments were calculated
using Link-segment model. An inverse dynamics
technique was used to compute forces and moment of
forces based on the kinematics and inertial properties
of the body. In free body diagram, segments are
broken which is used for presenting and calculating
unknown forces, moment of forces. Existing lower limb
models used inverse dynamics technique to estimate
lower limb joints but the numbers of joints analyzed are
limited. In this project the force and moment estimation
of each lower limb joint performed to give an idea for
limitation of force bearing values of lower limb
prosthetics. The aim of this paper is to provide design
inputs for the prosthetic feet development by giving the
approximated force and moment values of lower limb
joints. This experiment was performed to predict
quantification of lower limb prosthetics.
2. MATERIAL AND METHODS
To study the cause of deviation during different
phases of human gait, these experiments are useful
which uses Newtonian mechanics. It started with initial
conditions and then applying input values (i.e.
segmental mass, acceleration, moment of inertia etc.),
moment and force values were calculated with the help
of the properties such as segmental mass, center of
mass and radius of gyration.
For computing the internal kinetics of human
movement, it is necessary to have kinematics and
anthropometric parameters. The physical
characteristics like subject’s body weight can be
calculated by using Kistler force platform. As multiple
segment analysis of lower limb kinetic model assumes
frictionless joints and body segment treated as rigid bar
so the effect of friction was not assumed here. The
inertial parameters such as segmental mass, location
of center of mass, acceleration and segmental mass
moment of inertia are difficult to determine for a living
person, so it can be calculated with the help of values
from Dempster’s body segment parameter table. The
table has been created showing segmental mass as
proportion of total body mass, location of center of
gravity and radius of gyration (for angular acceleration)
as proportion of segmental length. With the help of the
approximate proportion values given in Dempster's
table, inertial values for a subject assuming weight
75Kg was calculated (Table 1) as here the force and
moment values for a 75kg subject have been
estimated. These inertial values of a subject play an
important role for estimating lower limb force and
moment values.
2.1. Mechanical Model of Lower Limb Joints
Based on the anatomical model (Figure 1A), a link
segment model (Figure 1B) is developed to estimate
internal forces and moment of forces of lower limb
joints. In the link segment model each segment is
replaced by product of mass and moment of inertia
located at each segment’s center of mass. A free body
diagram is a simple sketch including all of the forces
and moment of forces which helps to visualize the
direction of reaction forces acting on the body. Free
body diagram of lower limb segments which is mapped
to the anatomical model is shown in Figure 1C. The link
segment model is used to calculate the ground reaction
forces & muscle moments but a FBD of each segment
is also required which is broken at the joints & the
forces that act across each joint is estimated. In case of
FBD of lower limb, the segments represents the lower
limb joints were drawn in minimalist form (single line),
Table 1: Anthropometric Values for a 75 Kg Male
Acceleration (m/s2) Segment Mass (Kg) Moment of Inertia (Kg.m
2) Length (m)
X Y
Angular acceleration (rad/s
2)
Foot 1.2 0.011 0.195 -4.39 6.77 5.12
Leg 2.4 0.064 0.335 -4.01 2.75 -3.08
Thigh 6.0 0.130 0.30 6.58 -1.21 8.62
Estimation of Forces and Moments of Lower Limb Joints Journal of Rehabilitation Robotics, 2013, Vol. 1, No. 2 95
which are free from the other bodies. Segment’s center
of mass was indicated and from that point
accelerations were drawn. After that external reaction
forces and moment of forces along with unknown
forces were drawn with their directions. At the mass
center, the force of gravity was drawn and at the
proximal end of each segment reaction forces were
present.
2.2. Inverse Dynamics Technique
Net forces and moments cannot be measured
directly as they represent the net affect which produce
forces and moment of forces of each joint. So,
estimation of forces and moment of forces of hip joint,
knee joint and ankle joint were derived from the
kinematics and inertial properties of the body by
applying the process of inverse dynamics in the
developed FBD for motion analysis which explores
kinetics acting on human lower limb muscle and bone-
joints and finally presented the method for computing
the kinetics of human movements. For solving
unknown forces at ankle joint, knee joint and hip joint of
lower extremity, lower extremity was sectioned into
three segments (thigh, leg and foot) to determine the
interaction between them.
2.3. Estimation of Forces and Moments Using Newton-Euler Equation
The effects of force and moments on lower limb of
human body can be assessed using Newton-Euler
equation. The forces and moment acting at lower limb
joints were estimated by using parameters from
Dempster’s model (Table 1). In human body, a set of
forces act at a given point of time and it can be
possible to combine the forces into single resultant
force vector. Newton’s 2nd
law can then be considered
for the single resultant force where the resultant forces
were divided into unknown and known forces and the
unknown forces formed a single net force which can be
solved. The effects of forces & moment of forces acting
at the joints were determined where acceleration, mass
of each segment is known. The calculated net forces
and moment of forces represent the summation of net
effects of forces of respective lower limb joint structures
in producing movement. Each of the lower limbs joint is
responsible for the individual steps of human
movement. The effects of forces & moment of forces
acting at the joints were determined by using equation
1.1 and 1.2. In equation 1.1, ‘F’ represents force, ‘m’
represents mass, ‘a’ represents acceleration, In case of
equation 1.2, ‘M’ represents moment of force ‘I’
moment of inertia and ‘ ’ angular acceleration.
Newton Equation (Linear):
Fx = ma (1.1)
Euler Equation (Angular):
M = I (1.2)
2.4. Multi-Segment Analysis of Lower Limb
Complete analysis of human lower limb joint
segments was started at the most distal segment
(Foot) and continues proximally. For lower limb, only
the foot has three unknown parameters which can be
solved by using three equations. In the case of
proximal joints of lower limb (i.e. thigh or leg) there are
six unknown parameters at each joint. So the solution
Figure 1: (A) Anatomical model; (B) Link segment model; (C) Free body diagram of lower limb.
96 Journal of Rehabilitation Robotics, 2013, Vol. 1, No. 2 Chowdhury and Kumar
started with the most distal joint (ankle joint) that has
only one joint and after finding those three unknown
values one can precede to the adjacent segment. By
using Newton’s third law, it can be stated that the
forces on the distal end of one segment must be equal
and opposite to those of proximal end of the adjacent
segment. So, the unknown forces at ankle joint must be
in opposite direction to the proximal end of knee joint
and same for hip joint also. This is the method for
solving kinetics of a stance limb but when solving the
kinetics of swing limb, the process is same but the GRF
values are zero.
3. RESULTS
Matlab programs were developed for calculating
forces & moment of forces acting on the ankle joint,
knee joint and hip joint of lower limb joints, when the
ground reaction forces and the body inertial properties
are constant. By using the equations developed in the
MATLAB program the vertical, horizontal force and
moment values have been estimated. The other
program estimates the forces and moment for the
stance phase in the gait cycle through which force and
moments estimation of a human body is possible when
each segment’s mass, location of center of gravity and
segmental moment of inertia are known. Results
obtained are reported in Table 2. It can be concluded
that in case of lower limb joints, force values of the
horizontal direction are lesser than the force values of
vertical direction. The moment values decreases from
the ankle to hip joint and vertical force values increases
from the distal to proximal joint.
4. DISCUSSION
The project has been performed for evaluating
forces and moment values of lower limb joints during
walking so that one can predict the quality for
prosthetic feet during gait. The project also provides a
reference database for further research in clinical gait
analysis.
Inverse dynamics technique and Euler equation was
used to find out the force values and to estimate the
moment values by using free body diagram of the joints
of lower limb.
4.1. Interpretation
Estimating the forces and the moment of forces by
using MATLAB from the developed lower limb model
shows that the absolute moment value increases from
the ankle to hip joint and force value increases from the
distal to proximal joint. The knee and ankle forces
produced as a result of this work would be very
essential while designing the prosthetic foot. By using
these outcomes from this experiment, quality prediction
of a developed prosthetic foot is possible.
MATLAB Program Equations
a) To find the values of forces and moments of
ankle joint
A_x=m_f*a_x;
A_y=((m_f*g)+(m_f*a_y));
M_A=((I*alpha)+(A_x*d_y)+(A_y*d_x)):
b) To find the values of forces and moments of
knee joint
K_x=((m_l*a_x)-A_x);
K_y=((m_l*a_y)+(m_l*g)+(A_y));
M_K=((I*alpha)+(A_x*d_y_a)+(A_y*d_x_a)+(K_x*d_y_
k)+(K_y*d_x_k)+(M_A));
c) To find the values of forces and moments of Hip
joint
H_x=((m_t*a_x)-K_x);
H_y=((m_t*a_y)+(K_y)+(m_t*g));
M_H=((I*alpha)+(H_x*d_y_h)+(H_y*d_x_h)+(K_x*d_y_
k)+( K_y*d_x_k)+(M_K));
Table 2: Estimated Force and Moment Values for Lower Limb Joints
Lower limb Joint Horizontal force (AX) (N) Vertical force (Ay) (N) Moment (M) (Nm)
Ankle joint -5.27 19.9 -1.1
Knee joint -14.9 50 -9.1
Hip Joint 24.6 101.6 -11.7
Estimation of Forces and Moments of Lower Limb Joints Journal of Rehabilitation Robotics, 2013, Vol. 1, No. 2 97
Earlier model has analyzed the limited number of
joint forces and moments thus the improved model is
proposed. The force and moment values of hip joint are
greater than the values of knee and ankle joint because
hip joint can bear the maximum amount of forces
during walking and the pressure generated by the
ankle and knee joint are lesser than the hip joint. So,
the moment and force values of hip joint have
maximum value whereas ankle joint has minimum
value.
4.2. Implication
From the results of the force and the moment
estimation of lower limb joints, lower limb prosthetic
design inputs can be obtained which can mimic the
natural foot function. With the help of the force and
moment values, the force bearing limit of a prosthetic
foot can be obtained.
4.3. Limitations
The described model has some limitations which
are needed to be overcome and are as follows: it
assumes generalized and frictionless joints along with
fixed segmental length and fixed center of mass so the
effect of friction and joint structures were not
considered. The present model is sensitive to its input
data; measurement errors (i.e. skin motion artifacts and
captured motion) which can affect the moment data.
This model can estimate forces during stance phase of
gait cycle and has limitation for swing phase as it is
critical to estimate anthropometric parameters during
this phase. For development of prosthetic knee it is
needed to get the information for full gait cycle,
therefore besides the stance phase data, swing phase
data needs to be evaluated.
5. CONCLUSION
The paper has objective to evaluate forces and
moment of lower limb joints during walking. This
estimation predicts the shock absorption values and
quality for prosthetic feet during gait. The findings from
the modeling of lower limb walking can be used as a
design input for prosthetic foot development; a
prosthetic foot can be developed which can mimic the
natural foot function. It is useful for finding the cause of
deviation of any movement by estimating various
pattern of the forces and also explains how to calculate
force and moment of forces using kinematic and inertial
properties. The estimation of lower limb joint forces and
moment of forces can predict the force and moment
values i.e. shock absorption limits for lower limb
prosthetic design which can give the information about
performance of prosthetic knee and significance in
developing the idea about prosthetic feet design. It
provides a reference database for further research in
clinical gait analysis. The information obtained from this
experiment suggests any rectification required for the
lower limb prosthetic. The knee and ankle forces
produced as a result of this work would be very
essential while designing the prosthetic foot. By using
these outcomes from this experiment, quality prediction
of a developed prosthetic foot is possible.
REFERENCES
[1] Putcha Chandra S, Hodgdonm James A. Derivation of Differential Equations of Motion for Three-segment and Four-segment Human Locomotive Models using Free-body
Diagrams. Proceedings of the 22nd IASTED International Conference on Modelling, Identification, and Control IASTED/ACTA Press 2003; 17(2): 523-26.
[2] Onyshko S, Winter DA. A Mathematical Model for the
Dynamics of Human Locomotion. J Biomech 1980; 13(3): 361-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(80)90016-0
[3] Winter DA. Overall Principle of Lower Limb support during Stance phase of Gait. J Biomech 1985; 13(2): 923-27.
[4] Arnold EM, Ward SR, Lieber RL, Delp SL. A Model of the
Lower Limb for Analysis of Human Movement. Ann Biomed Eng 2010; 38(2): 269-79.
[5] Bharatkumar G, Daigle KE, Pandey MG, Cai Q, Aggarwal JK. Lower limb kinematics of human walking with the medial axis transformation. Am J Phys Med 1996; 46(1): 290-33.
[6] MacKinnon Colum D, Winter David A. Control of Whole Body
Balance in the Frontal Plane During Human Walking. J Biomech 1992; 6(26): 622-44.
[7] Lenka PK, Ratnesh K, Tibarewala DN. Gait Measures and Dynamic Weight bearing in Young and Elder Trans-tibal Amputee using PTB Prosthesis with SACH foot. Al Ameen J Med Sci 2008; 1(2): 115-25.
[8] Bresler B, Frankel JP. The Forces and Moments in the Leg
During Level Walking. Trans Am Soc Mech Eng 1950 ; 2(32): 27-36.
[9] Chow CK, Jacobson DH. Studies in Human Locomotion via Optimal Programming. Math Biosci 1971; 10(4): 239-306. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0025-5564(71)90062-9
[10] Chow CK, Jacobson DH. Further Studies in Human
Locomotion: Postural Stability and Control. Math Biosci 1972; 15(2): 93-108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0025-5564(72)90065-X
[11] Crownenshield R, Johnson RJ. An Analytical Model of the
Knee. J Biomech 1976; 9(5): 397-405. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(76)90117-2
[12] Amirouche FML, Ider SK, Trimble J. Analytical Method for the Analysis and Simulation of Human Locomotion. J Biomech Eng 1998; 112(7): 379-86.
[13] Audu ML, Davy DT. The Influence of Muscle Model
Complexity in Musculoskeletal Motion Modeling. J Biomech Eng 1985; 107(3): 147-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.3138535
98 Journal of Rehabilitation Robotics, 2013, Vol. 1, No. 2 Chowdhury and Kumar
[14] Bandera C, Manzilli Minen G. Human Walking Dynamic
Model Using ADAMS - An Approach to Biomechanics of the Knee Under Dynamic Loads. Mech Dynam 1990; 24(2): 15-19.
[15] Kim SM, Lee SY, Kang HC, Jeong JH. Study of Knee and
Hip Joint’s Moment Estimation by Biomechanical Simulation During Various Motion Changes. Proc World Congr Eng Comp Sci 2009; 2: 978-88.
Received on 24-09-2013 Accepted on 26-11-2013 Published on 31-01-2014
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12970/2308-8354.2013.01.02.3
© 2013 Chowdhury and Kumar; Licensee Synergy Publishers.
This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.