9.401 auditing
DESCRIPTION
9.401 Auditing. Chapter 6 Audit Evidence. What is Audit Evidence?. =Any information used by the auditor to draw conclusions regarding whether the information being audited is stated in accordance with the established criterion - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
9.401 Auditing
Chapter 6Chapter 6
Audit EvidenceAudit Evidence
What is Audit Evidence?
=Any information =Any information used by the auditor used by the auditor to draw conclusions regarding to draw conclusions regarding whether the information being audited is whether the information being audited is
stated in accordance with the established stated in accordance with the established criterioncriterion
• Must be Must be sufficient sufficient and and appropriate appropriate at lowest at lowest possible costpossible cost
Audit evidence decisions
NatureNature What type of procedure to use and what What type of procedure to use and what
evidence to gatherevidence to gather TimingTiming
When evidence is gathered and covering When evidence is gathered and covering what time periodwhat time period
Extent Extent How many items to test and which items How many items to test and which items
to selectto select
Sufficient and Appropriate Evidence
Sufficiency:Sufficiency:• Refers to quantityRefers to quantity• ““Extent” evidence Extent” evidence
decisiondecision• Depends on Depends on
expectations of expectations of errors, quality of errors, quality of controls, size of controls, size of popn, materiality, popn, materiality, level of assurance, level of assurance, etc.etc.
AppropriatenessAppropriateness• Refers to qualityRefers to quality• ““Nature” and Nature” and
“Timing” evidence “Timing” evidence decisionsdecisions
• Depends on level of Depends on level of assurance neededassurance needed
• If evidence is not If evidence is not appropriate, appropriate, sufficiency won’t sufficiency won’t help.help.
To be appropriate… RelevanceRelevance
= addresses the objective or assertion= addresses the objective or assertionEg. Existence vs. completenessEg. Existence vs. completeness
Auditor’s direct knowledge vs. otherwiseAuditor’s direct knowledge vs. otherwise Examination, observation, inspection or Examination, observation, inspection or
computation by auditor > someone elsecomputation by auditor > someone else Independence of providerIndependence of provider
Provider external to org > external to Provider external to org > external to acctg dept > acctg deptacctg dept > acctg dept
Documents external to org > external Documents external to org > external docs held by org > internal docsdocs held by org > internal docs
To be appropriate… Effectiveness of Internal controlsEffectiveness of Internal controls
Evidence from system of good I.C. > Evidence from system of good I.C. > evidence from system of poor I.C.evidence from system of poor I.C.
Qualifications of individuals providing the Qualifications of individuals providing the informationinformation
Degree of objectivity of evidence (vs. Degree of objectivity of evidence (vs. subjectivity)subjectivity)
Timing Auditor must express conclusion on information at Auditor must express conclusion on information at
balance sheet date.balance sheet date. However, may gather information as at non-However, may gather information as at non-
balance sheet date and “roll forward” the balance sheet date and “roll forward” the conclusion by:conclusion by: Substantive testsSubstantive tests Relying on internal controlsRelying on internal controls Other proceduresOther procedures
To do this, consider To do this, consider quality of internal controls, quality of internal controls, materiality of item and materiality of item and level of risk associated with itemlevel of risk associated with item
Types of Evidence1)1) Physical ExaminationPhysical Examination
• = inspection or count of tangible assets= inspection or count of tangible assets• Good evidence of existence, but not at all of Good evidence of existence, but not at all of
ownership and not really of valuationownership and not really of valuation2)2) ConfirmationConfirmation
• = receipt of response from 3= receipt of response from 3rdrd party verifying party verifying accuracy of info requested by auditoraccuracy of info requested by auditor
• Costly, but reliable evidence of existenceCostly, but reliable evidence of existence• Usually required for A/R except in certain Usually required for A/R except in certain
circumstancescircumstances• Used for many other accounts as wellUsed for many other accounts as well• Must be kept under control of auditorMust be kept under control of auditor
Types of Evidence3)3) DocumentationDocumentation
• = inspection of documents and records= inspection of documents and records• Quality depends on quality of document Quality depends on quality of document
(external vs. internal, internal control)(external vs. internal, internal control)• If electronic, auditors must assess controls If electronic, auditors must assess controls
over changes to documentsover changes to documents
4)4) ObservationObservation• = watching certain activities= watching certain activities• Generally needs corroboration for assurance Generally needs corroboration for assurance
that conditions persist that conditions persist
Types of Evidence5)5) Inquiries of ClientInquiries of Client
• = written or oral representations of client in = written or oral representations of client in response to auditor’s request for informationresponse to auditor’s request for information
• Generally not conclusive, should be Generally not conclusive, should be corroborated when possiblecorroborated when possible
• Underlines importance of mgmt good faith, Underlines importance of mgmt good faith, care must be taken in choosing clientscare must be taken in choosing clients
6)6) ReperformanceReperformance• = auditor rechecking computations or other = auditor rechecking computations or other
operations done by clientoperations done by client• Particularly often used when testing controls Particularly often used when testing controls
7. Analytical Procedures
= using financial and non financial data in = using financial and non financial data in meaningful comparisons and relationships meaningful comparisons and relationships to determine whether account balance is to determine whether account balance is reasonablereasonable
Can be quite effective at low costCan be quite effective at low cost Reliability depends on quality of data, Reliability depends on quality of data,
nature of analysis, skill of auditor, level of nature of analysis, skill of auditor, level of detaildetail
Purposes of Analytical Tests
As audit evidence which enables the As audit evidence which enables the reduction of audit testing of details.reduction of audit testing of details.
Indication of errors in the statements Indication of errors in the statements requiring follow-up.requiring follow-up.
Indication of financial difficulty.Indication of financial difficulty. Understanding the client’s business and Understanding the client’s business and
industry.industry. An aid to management.An aid to management.
When Analytical procedures are used:
MUST be used in:MUST be used in: planningplanning final reviewfinal review
MAY be used as a substantive testMAY be used as a substantive test
Analytical Procedures Comparison of Current year balances to:Comparison of Current year balances to:
balances for one or more comparable periods.balances for one or more comparable periods. company’s budgets and forecasts.company’s budgets and forecasts. other current-year balances for conformity with other current-year balances for conformity with
predictable patterns based on the company’s predictable patterns based on the company’s experience.experience.
similar information for the industry in which the similar information for the industry in which the company operates.company operates.
relevant non-financial information.relevant non-financial information.
Analysis of Un-audited Financial Statements
Horizontal analysisHorizontal analysis examines changes of FS numbers examines changes of FS numbers and ratios across two or more yearsand ratios across two or more years
Vertical analysisVertical analysis examines FS amounts expressed each examines FS amounts expressed each year as proportions of a base.year as proportions of a base.
Auditors look for relationships in accounts as indicators Auditors look for relationships in accounts as indicators of problems and to plan further audit workof problems and to plan further audit work
Problems discovered by analytical procedures
Account balances that seem high could indicate Account balances that seem high could indicate problems with:problems with: existenceexistence valuationvaluation ownershipownership
Account balances that seem low could indicate Account balances that seem low could indicate problems with:problems with: completenesscompleteness valuationvaluation
Conclusions from analytical procedures Don’t indicate definitively that there is an Don’t indicate definitively that there is an
error. Unexpected fluctuations may be from error. Unexpected fluctuations may be from error or non-error causes.error or non-error causes.
Client explanations should be corroborated Client explanations should be corroborated if they relate to a material item.if they relate to a material item.