9/20/20151 new jica and project evaluation ryutaro koga evaluation department japan international...
TRANSCRIPT
04/21/23 1
NEW JICA and
Project Evaluation
Ryutaro Koga
Evaluation Department
Japan International Cooperation Agency
04/21/23 2
Presentation points
Reorganization of JBIC and JICA on Oct.1,2008 New JICA’s Organization Change of ODA project evaluation in Japan Evaluation System of New JICA Current issues of evaluation in New JICA
04/21/23 3
Reorganization of JBIC and JICA
Restructuring of government financial institutions ( triggered by Prime Minister Koizumi’s initiative)OOF wing of JBIC is merged with other 3
domestic banks establishing JFCODA wing of JBIC is merged with JICA
ODA agency reformOne stop service window of ODA
04/21/23 4
Reorganization of JBIC and JICA
S&MNational.
Agri.
MOFA
NEW JICA
JBIC
JFC
JICA JBIC
ODA operations OOF
operations
MOFA Grant
60%
40%
3 domestic banks
04/21/23 5
Organization of New JICA
One stop ODA agency of Japanese Gov.
: Technical assistance, Grant assistance and Loan assistance
Synergy is expected, as well as coherence of evaluation method, but to what extent?
04/21/23 6
The Vision and 4 missions
Inclusive and dynamic development1. Tackling issues caused by globalization
2. Equitable growth and poverty reduction
3. Governance improvement
4. Realization of Human security
04/21/23 7
Strategies for fulfilling missions Inclusive assistance : 3 schemes, policies, institutions,
human developments, infrastructure development Successive assistance : each stage of disaster prevention,
emergency assistance, early rehabilitation, mid-term or long-term assistance
Promoting development partnership : trying to become a best partner, understanding needs, effectively and speedily support self-help of partner countries, universities, NGOs, private companies, local governments, international players.
Research and its external dissemination : establishing JICA Institute, provision of intellectual values in the development assistance arena based on fields experiences with collaborations with int’l partners
04/21/23 8
Change of Implementation Entities of ODA operations in Japan
Grant AssistanceBy MOFA
(160 Bil. Yen)(about 1.6 Bil. US$)
Technical Assistance By JICA
(170 Bil. Yen)(about 1.7 Bil. US$)
ODA Loan Assistance By JBIC
( 770 Bil. Yen )(about 7.7 Bil. US$)
Grant AssistanceBy MOFA Grant/Technical/ Loan Assistance
By New JICA(1040 Billion Yen)
(About 10 Billion US$)
40%
60%
Before
After
04/21/23 9
Evaluation System of New JICA
Target: Technical cooperation projects Loan assistance projects Grant assistance projects Program assistance
04/21/23 10
Evaluation System of New JICA
Methodologies: Ex-ante to Ex-post evaluation External Evaluation Publication DAC 5 principles for Loan projects and
Project Technical Assistances
“Plan Do Check Action” Cycle
Preparation PhaseEx-Ante Evaluation:
- Examine the project’s relevance, its scope, expected impacts, and evaluation indicators
Implementation PhaseMid-Term/ Terminal Evaluation:
- Review the project’s relevance and its progress, prospects for realizing results, and factors affecting realization of effects
After CompletionEx-Post Evaluation
/ Ex-Post Monitoring
- Evaluate the project’s relevance, its impact, effectiveness, efficiency, sustainability, etc.
Feedback Phase
-Use feedback as means for better planning & implementation of future similar projects, as well as the evaluated project itself
Aid SchemeMid-Term Review
Terminal
EvaluationEx-post
EvaluationEx-post
Monitoring
Technical Cooperation
○ ○ ○ ○ -
○ODA Loans ○ ○ - ○ ○
Grant Aid ○ - - ○ -
PPlanlan
CCheckheckDDoo
AAction
ction
04/21/23 12
Issues of evaluation in New JICA
Program evaluation (3 scheme coordinated programs)
Coordination and coherence of evaluation methods between 3 schemes (ex. ratings)
Impact evaluation (more robust measuring of results, result based evaluation, cost efficiency)
Thematic evaluation (ex. contributions of big scale infrastructures on non-hardware related aspects)
Grant projects evaluation (transfer from MOFA)
04/21/23 13
A Sample Evaluation : Bangladesh 4 donor evaluation
Since 2005, Evalunet of DAC advocated country level evaluation in order for verifying AID impacts. Bangladesh, as a suitable target.
Participants: World Bank ADB DFID Japan (JICA)
Which, share about 60% to 80% of all AID to Bangladesh. Sept. 2009 CAE (expected) of WB is axis and other donors
participate by inputting to CAE or conducting sector related evaluation.
JICA (previous JBIC) takes part of transport sector evaluation based on its experience. ( on going by Feb 2009)
04/21/23 14
4-donor Joint evaluation :Scheme chart
(3)4-donor Joint Evaluation Report (June,2009)Focused on aid coordination
(2) ADB Sector Survey
(Urban, Water, Education)
(2) JICA Sector Survey
(Transport)
(1) WB CAE
(Governance, Growth, Human
Development, Agriculture,
Environment, gender, Aid
Effectiveness)
ADB CAPE(FY 2008 )
Japan CAE(After FY2008)
Addition by DFID, ADB
Feed in
Feed in
Feed in to CAE FY2008 and after
04/21/23 15
Thank you.
For further information on our evaluation
http://www.jica.go.jp/english/operations/evaluation/