9. source cost methodology

17
Análisis de Costos Universidad Cuauhtémoc Campus Aguascalientes Source Cost Methodology Maestría en Administración

Upload: leonardo-figueroa

Post on 24-May-2015

754 views

Category:

Business


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 9. Source Cost Methodology

Análisis de Costos

Universidad CuauhtémocCampus Aguascalientes

Source Cost Methodology

Maestría en Administración

Page 2: 9. Source Cost Methodology

Contents

ACCOUNTING STRUCTURE1

SOURCE COST2

FORECAST REVIEW3

COST CURVE4

Source Cost Methodology2

Page 3: 9. Source Cost Methodology

Profit & Cost Centers Structure

Source Cost Methodology

A well defined Accounting Structure is key to manage the

transactions and monitor expenditures efficiently !!

A well defined Accounting Structure is key to manage the

transactions and monitor expenditures efficiently !!

3

Page 4: 9. Source Cost Methodology

Account Groups

Source Cost Methodology

By categorizing the accounts in a Source Cost structure, we can assign ownership and delegate

responsibility for each category. This is very useful when

reviewing actuals and defining forecast plans.

By categorizing the accounts in a Source Cost structure, we can assign ownership and delegate

responsibility for each category. This is very useful when

reviewing actuals and defining forecast plans.

4

Page 5: 9. Source Cost Methodology

Source Cost Ownership

Source Cost Methodology

Cost Category Owner

Direct Material Hugo

Pay & Benefits Moni

Depreciation Pepe

Spares Ivonne

Supplies Lety

Utilities Armando

Freight Abraham

Others Rocio

Owners are responsible for actuals and forecast figures

5

Page 6: 9. Source Cost Methodology

Cost Pareto

Circuits20%

Metals17%

Plastics10%

Glue8%

Packing5%

Pay & Benefits

15%

Depreciation7%

Spares6%

Supplies5%

Utilities4%

Freight2%

Others1%

Direct Material 60%Labor & Overhead 40%

Source Cost Methodology6

Page 7: 9. Source Cost Methodology

Source Cost Reporting

Source Cost Methodology

Actual results can be reviewed periodically and compared against another period of time. The monitoring of expenditures is necessary

to aim a proactive decision making.

Actual results can be reviewed periodically and compared against another period of time. The monitoring of expenditures is necessary

to aim a proactive decision making.

7

Page 8: 9. Source Cost Methodology

QUANTITY (KU)

Volume TREND

Volume is forecasted based on:• Beginning Inventory• Firm Demand• Estimated Demand• Ending Inventory

Source Cost Methodology8

Page 9: 9. Source Cost Methodology

Direct Materials

UNIDADES 291,080 510,114 749,285 764,503 738,500 26,003 758,687 759,330 767,052 770,019

Act Act Act Act EST AP AP AP AP$ 1Q10 2Q10 3Q10 4Q10 4Q10 DELTA 1Q11 2Q11 3Q11 4Q11DIRECT MATERIAL COST

CIRCUITS 1,680,796 2,532,507 3,705,718 4,268,617 4,120,000 -148,617 4,351,490 4,360,070 4,408,690 4,425,850METALS 65,583 104,566 146,363 150,141 144,000 -6,141 167,310 167,310 168,740 170,170PLASTICS 1,747,992 3,341,389 4,688,711 5,115,630 5,120,000 4,370 5,263,198 4,856,740 4,912,406 4,933,796GLUE 419,226 706,873 1,064,684 1,071,945 1,025,000 -46,945 1,106,820 1,108,250 1,121,120 1,125,410PACKING 321,870 566,187 811,232 822,087 790,000 -32,087 913,770 915,200 925,210 928,070GAP TO GOAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 -19,865 -39,730 -59,595 -79,459

TOTAL 4,235,466 7,251,523 10,416,707 11,428,419 11,199,000 -229,419 11,782,723 11,367,841 11,476,571 11,503,836

$/UNITCIRCUITS 5.77 4.96 4.95 5.58 5.58 -0.1% 5.74 5.74 5.75 5.75METALS 0.23 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.19 -0.7% 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22PLASTICS 6.01 6.55 6.26 6.69 6.93 3.5% 6.94 6.40 6.40 6.41GLUE 1.44 1.39 1.42 1.40 1.39 -1.0% 1.46 1.46 1.46 1.46PACKING 1.11 1.11 1.08 1.08 1.07 -0.5% 1.20 1.21 1.21 1.21GAP TO GOAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.03 -0.05 -0.08 -0.10

TOTAL 14.55 14.22 13.90 14.95 15.16 1.4% 15.53 14.97 14.96 14.94

Source Cost Methodology9

Page 10: 9. Source Cost Methodology

Direct MaterialsCost Reduction Programs

• Price Negotiations

• Yield & Usage Improvement

• Process Improvement

• Develop low cost supplier sources

• “Think of out of the box to find cost opportunities”

Source Cost Methodology10

Page 11: 9. Source Cost Methodology

Labor & Overhead

Source Cost Methodology

UNIDADES 291,080 510,114 749,285 764,503 738,500 26,003 758,687 759,330 767,052 770,019

Act Act Act Act EST AP AP AP AP$ 1Q10 2Q10 3Q10 4Q10 4Q10 DELTA 1Q11 2Q11 3Q11 4Q11

CLAM CostPAY & BENEFITS 3,066,158 3,934,955 4,756,552 4,793,837 4,790,000 -3,837 4,946,034 5,084,395 4,828,810 4,955,321DEPRECIATION 1,611,994 1,501,790 1,200,887 932,842 932,800 -42 973,115 982,410 994,565 1,009,580SPARES 530,614 489,226 1,076,126 839,287 750,000 -89,287 1,038,752 1,033,275 946,088 921,349SUPPLIES 223,570 665,316 899,360 1,248,005 1,205,000 -43,005 752,426 641,463 646,513 648,921FREIGHT 6,165 6,288 8,373 11,457 12,000 543 8,580 8,580 8,580 8,580UTILITIES 443,393 599,210 763,912 819,898 790,000 -29,898 802,326 751,515 796,113 808,473OUTSIDE SERVICES 450,533 457,503 486,857 483,142 450,000 -33,142 478,270 478,270 478,270 478,270OTHERS 269,328 437,725 491,444 703,986 710,000 6,014 605,968 605,968 605,968 605,968GAP TO GOAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 -55,000 -75,000 -100,000 -200,000

Total CLAM: 6,601,755 8,092,014 9,683,511 9,832,454 9,639,800 -192,654 9,550,471 9,510,876 9,204,906 9,236,462

$/UNITPAY & BENEFITS 10.53 7.71 6.35 6.27 6.49 3.3% 6.52 6.70 6.30 6.44DEPRECIATION 5.54 2.94 1.60 1.22 1.26 3.4% 1.28 1.29 1.30 1.31SPARES 1.82 0.96 1.44 1.10 1.02 -8.1% 1.37 1.36 1.23 1.20SUPPLIES 0.77 1.30 1.20 1.63 1.63 0.0% 0.99 0.84 0.84 0.84FREIGHT 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 7.8% 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01UTILITIES 1.52 1.17 1.02 1.07 1.07 -0.3% 1.06 0.99 1.04 1.05OUTSIDE SERVICES 1.55 0.90 0.65 0.63 0.61 -3.7% 0.63 0.63 0.62 0.62OTHERS 0.93 0.86 0.66 0.92 0.96 4.2% 0.80 0.80 0.79 0.79GAP TO GOAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.07 -0.10 -0.13 -0.26

Total CLAM: 22.68 15.86 12.92 12.86 13.05 1.5% 12.59 12.53 12.00 12.00

11

Page 12: 9. Source Cost Methodology

Labor & OverheadCost Reduction Programs

• Productivity Improvement• People fficiency• Equipment efficiency

• Overtime Control

• Tight control on Discretionary Expendings

• Be flexible. Adjust resources to demand levels

• “Think of out of the box to find cost opportunities”

Source Cost Methodology12

Page 13: 9. Source Cost Methodology

Act Act Act Act EST AP AP AP AP1Q10 2Q10 3Q10 4Q10 4Q10 DELTA 1Q11 2Q11 3Q11 4Q11

Loadings:

UNITS 291,080 510,114 749,285 764,503 738,500 26,003 758,687 759,330 767,052 770,019

P&L - InternalREVENUE 11,098,700 18,872,550 25,125,271 26,788,700 26,500,000 288,700 27,733,152 27,977,480 27,919,995 29,036,418

DIRECT MATERIAL 4,235,466 7,251,523 10,416,707 11,428,419 11,199,000 -229,419 11,782,723 11,367,841 11,476,571 11,503,836LABOR & OVERHEAD 6,601,755 8,092,014 9,683,511 9,832,454 9,639,800 -192,654 9,550,471 9,510,876 9,204,906 9,236,462TOTAL COST 10,837,221 15,343,537 20,100,217 21,260,873 20,838,800 -422,073 21,333,194 20,878,716 20,681,477 20,740,299

Internal PFO 261,479 3,529,013 5,025,054 5,527,827 5,661,200 -133,373 6,399,958 7,098,764 7,238,517 8,296,119

REVENUE / UNIT 38.13 37.00 33.53 35.04 35.88 -2.3% 36.55 36.84 36.40 37.71DIRECT MTL / UNIT 14.55 14.22 13.90 14.95 15.16 1.4% 15.53 14.97 14.96 14.94L&O / UNIT 22.68 15.86 12.92 12.86 13.05 1.5% 12.59 12.53 12.00 12.00TOTAL COST / UNIT 37.23 30.08 26.83 27.81 28.22 1.4% 28.12 27.50 26.96 26.93

HEADCOUNT 2,850 3,160 3,220 3,218 3,220 2 3,225 3,225 3,225 3,225

13 Source Cost Methodology

Financial Summary

Page 14: 9. Source Cost Methodology

14

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 EST

2011 AP

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

1.10

1.20

1.30

1.40

1.501.400

1.170

0.922

0.868 0.893

0.871 0.911

0.994 0.951

0.988 0.976

PROD A PROD B UNIT COST

Cost TREND

QUANTITY (KU) COST ($/UNIT)

Source Cost Methodology

Page 15: 9. Source Cost Methodology

Variable Portion: 52%Cost Curve View

Theorethical BEST - MODEL

Source Cost Methodology15

Page 16: 9. Source Cost Methodology

EXCEL SPREADSHEET

Source Cost Methodology

Finance Template

16

Page 17: 9. Source Cost Methodology

Análisis de CostosMaestría en Administración