9, 10 february 2006 semantic interoperability architecture pilot summary 1 semantic interoperability...
TRANSCRIPT
9, 10 February 2006 Semantic Interoperability ArchitecturePilot Summary
1
Semantic Interoperability at Work:Improving Rapid First Response
What DoesSemantic Interoperability
Really Mean?
9, 10 February 2006 Semantic Interoperability ArchitecturePilot Summary
2
Semantic Interoperability at Work:Improving Rapid First Response
First, Foremost,Interoperability
MeansTeamwork
9, 10 February 2006 Semantic Interoperability ArchitecturePilot Summary
3
What Does a Semantic Interoperability Architecture
Look Like?
• This Pilot is a Practical Example Emergency Management Centric Participants Represent Spectrum
• Following Slide Shows Most of the Components Collection of Participants Align
Themselves through Semantically Ordered Registries or Out of Band Web Services Bindings
Shows Messaging Flows Perspective
9, 10 February 2006 Semantic Interoperability ArchitecturePilot Summary
4
9, 10 February 2006 Semantic Interoperability ArchitecturePilot Summary
5
Semantic Keys to Improving Rapid First Response
• Train Derailment Example: 6 January 2005, 3:50 A.M. Graniteville, SC Chlorine Tank Car Toxic Release
• Matching ResponseType with EventType
• Using Open Public Standards• Getting the Right Information to the
Right People at the Right Time
9, 10 February 2006 Semantic Interoperability ArchitecturePilot Summary
6
Semantic Interoperability
• Simplified Analogies
9, 10 February 2006 Semantic Interoperability ArchitecturePilot Summary
7
Semantics Simplified
• Semantics Defines Meanings Standardized Domain-Specific
Terminologies/Vocabularies Conflicting, Duplicated, Overlapping
Teminologies can be mapped• Interoperability Needs Semantic
Roadmaps, Guides, Dictionaries, etc. for Translating Similar but Disparate Vocabularies
• Ontologies are Classification Systems We Use for Organizing Vocabularies as well as Within Vocabularies
9, 10 February 2006 Semantic Interoperability ArchitecturePilot Summary
8
Semantic Interoperability in “Semantic Web” Foundation
•We Use Web Ontology Language (OWL) Understanding Relationship of
Terms to Domain-Specific Context Required
EDI For Instance UBL, ebXML, etc Setting Standards
for Business Context
9, 10 February 2006 Semantic Interoperability ArchitecturePilot Summary
9
How are we Showing Semantic Interoperability?
• We Use Standards from the Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards (OASIS)
• Common Alerting Protocol (CAP) 1.0 1.1 Recently Approved as OASIS Standard, Pilot
uses 1.0 • Emergency Data Exchange Language
Distribution Element (EDXL_DE) 1.0 Committee Specification
Simulated Event Type & Sender/Recipient Type Ontologies Drive Improved Routing
Simulated Event Type also Drives Lookup for Secondary Healthcare & Geospatial Services
9, 10 February 2006 Semantic Interoperability ArchitecturePilot Summary
10
Event Type Ontology Application: Protégé: http//www.protégé.stanford.edu
9, 10 February 2006 Semantic Interoperability ArchitecturePilot Summary
11
Event Type Ontology in ContextApplication: Unicorn Workbench: http//www.unicorn.com
9, 10 February 2006 Semantic Interoperability ArchitecturePilot Summary
12
Semantic Interoperability Summary
• Teamwork Through Semantically Ordered Web Services
• Registries Allow Related Companies/Entities to Locate Each Other
• Registries Allow Resources to be Located and Bound through Web Services
• Registries Add Layer of Role-Based Security• Third Party Portals and Communities, such
as Geospatial and Healthcare Can Aid Preparedness through Semantically Ordered, PreRegistered Web Services
9, 10 February 2006 Semantic Interoperability ArchitecturePilot Summary
13
Semantic Interoperability Examples
9, 10 February 2006 Semantic Interoperability ArchitecturePilot Summary
14
Semantic Interoperability Examples
9, 10 February 2006 Semantic Interoperability ArchitecturePilot Summary
15
Semantic Interoperability Examples
9, 10 February 2006 Semantic Interoperability ArchitecturePilot Summary
16
Semantic Interoperability Examples
9, 10 February 2006 Semantic Interoperability ArchitecturePilot Summary
17
Semantic Interoperability Examples
9, 10 February 2006 Semantic Interoperability ArchitecturePilot Summary
18
Semantic Interoperability Examples
9, 10 February 2006 Semantic Interoperability ArchitecturePilot Summary
19
Full Roster of Pilot Participants
• RedHat (RedHat Enterprise Linux Operating System)• Oracle Corp (Database, Application Server, WSRP Portal)• Humanmarkup.org, Inc. (Public Service Preparedness Portal)• Starbourne Communications Design (Portal Design
Development)• Broadstrokes, Inc. (Reverse 911 Service)• Targus Information Corporation, Inc. (Geographically
encoded consolidated national Reverse-911 database)• MyStateUSA (Simulated NIMS-ICS Network running as Web
Services through MyStateUSA Interoperable Hub)• WarningSystems, Inc. (Web-based Activation of EAS, Sirens,
Radios)• MCI (Internet Network Backbone)• Sandia National Laboratories (Sensor Network Simulation)• NuParadigm (Alerting Framework Network Services)• Unicorn Solutions, Inc. (Ontology/Data Model Workbench)