841961
DESCRIPTION
kkTRANSCRIPT
Employee involvementand qualitymanagement
Hongyi Sun
Ip Kee Hui
Agnes Y.K. Tam and
Jan Frick
Introduction
EI is a process designed to empower members
of an organization to make decisions and to
solve problems appropriate to their level in
the organization (Pace, 1989). The logic of EI
is that the people closest to a problem or
opportunity are in the best position to make
decisions for improvement if they have
control of the improvement process.
At the heart of TQM is the concept of
intrinsic motivation-involvement in decision
making. It is becoming an increasingly
popular maxim of good management that
human resources are the most important
dimension in quality and productivity
improvement (Ross, 1994). The chief
executive officers of some of the most quality-
conscious companies in the USA are quick to
point out that the best way to achieve
organizational success is by empowering and
involving employees at all levels. The
Chairman of General Electric has said: `̀ To
get every worker to have a new idea every day
is the route to winning in the 1990s''.
A survey by HR Focus (1993) revealed that
EI was rated as one of the top three concerns
by 46 per cent of the 1,000 respondents. EI
has also been widely studied in association
with TQM and human resources
management (Wood and Peccei, 1995;
Cheng and Tummala, 1998; Wilkinson,
1998). In the past few years, a large amount
of case evidence has shown that
empowerment does produce more satisfied
customers and employees. However, there
has been little research done on the empirical
relationship between employee involvement
and quality management. This current study
investigated the relationship between EI,
TQM, ISO 9000 registration and the
improvement of business performance.
Literature review and researchframework
Perhaps the most interesting results from the
study are how EI and TQM work together to
impact on organizational performance
(Lawler et al., 1995). Some researchers
believe that EI is associated with quality
management activities such as quality circles
The authors
Hongyi Sun, Ip Kee Hui and Agnes Y.K. Tam are all in
the Department of Manufacturing Engineering and
Engineering Management, City University of Hong Kong,
Hong Kong.
Jan Frick is in the Department of Business
Administration, Stavanger College, Norway.
Keywords
Employee involvement, TQM, ISO 9000, Performance
Abstract
This paper records the research on the investigation of the
empirical relationship between employee involvement (EI)
and quality management. It is based on data from a
survey of 180 manufacturing companies. The main
findings are: EI is positively correlated with total quality
management (TQM) enablers; EI is positively correlated
with improvements in business performance; EI positively
influences the contribution of TQM to the improvement of
business performance; EI is marginally related to ISO
registration; and EI has no effect on the contribution of
ISO 9000 registration. The conclusion is that EI should be
incorporated into TQM and ISO 9000 registration.
Implications for practice and future research are also
discussed.
Electronic access
The research register for this journal is available at
http://www.mcbup.com/research_registers/
quality.asp
The current issue and full text archive of this journal is
available at
http://www.emerald-library.com
Research and concepts
The authors acknowledge the financial support of
Strategic Research Grant (SRG 7000948) from
City University of Hong Kong.
350
The TQM Magazine
Volume 12 . Number 5 . 2000 . pp. 350±354
# MCB University Press . ISSN 0954-478X
and communication. According to Evans
(1985) and Hogan (1992), employees
participate in advisory groups to voice
concerns and exchange views on quality
issues. For example, two hotels use employee
focus groups, called `̀ employee exchange
communication meetings'', as a means of
giving employees an opportunity to address
their concerns or to provide input on
upcoming issues.
In the past few years, a large amount of case
evidence has shown that empowerment does
result in more satisfied customers and
employees. For example, research has shown
that job enrichment and task characteristics
such as skill variety and autonomy are directly
associated with higher work quality and
employee satisfaction (Kopelman, 1986).
Self-managing work teams typically produce
positive results in terms of quality and costs
(Beekun, 1990; Sundstrom et al., 1990).
Similarly, gain-sharing plans result in
substantial cost improvements as well as
better services (Cooper et al., 1992). In
addition, Partlow (1996) suggested that
TQM should be supported by human
resources practices such as EI. Inspired by the
discussions in previous research on the
relationship between EI, TQM and
performance, we formulated the following
three research questions:
(1) Does EI have any relationship with the
implementation of quality management
practices such as TQM?
(2) Does EI influence the improvement of
business performance?
(3) Does EI influence the contribution of
TQM to the improvement of business
performance?
Very little research has been done on the
relationship between ISO 9000 and EI.
Velury (1996) believes that it seems logical for
an organization to obtain ISO 9000
certification through EI, which has been
shown to reduce the time to certification by
shortening the initial learning curve.
Ultimately, the initial benefits of ISO 9000
are directly proportional to the depth and
breadth of EI. However, Curkovic and
Handfield (1996) found that ISO 9000
registration criteria fail to measure key areas
of quality management, including strategic
planning, EI, quality results and customer
satisfaction. These arguments lead to a
further two questions:
(4) Does EI have any relationship with ISO
9000 certificates?
(5) Does EI influence the contribution of
ISO 9000 certificates to the improvement
of business performance?
The variables and their relationships in the
above research questions are illustrated in a
framework in Figure 1. Previous research was
mainly based on case studies and in service
organizations. This research will investigate
the empirical relationship between EI,
TQM and ISO 9000 in manufacturing
companies.
Research method and empiricaldata
This study is based on a survey. The first
version of the questionnaire was designed by
Rao and Raghu-Nathan (Solis et al., 1998) at
Toledo University. It covers the following
criteria: quality leadership; human resources
development; quality strategy; information
resources; process and product; people
satisfaction; customer satisfaction; social and
environmental impact; and the results. EI
questions were added to the survey conducted
in Norway, in order to find out whether
employees were given appropriate power in
decision making, etc. (Sun, 1999). Twelve
questions on employee involvement were
asked.
Other information on ISO 9000
certification was also requested. This survey
was conducted in Norway with the support of
the Norwegian Quality Association (NFK)
Figure 1 A framework illustrating the variables and research questions
351
Employee involvement and quality management
Hongyi Sun, Ip Kee Hui, Agnes Y.K. Tam and Jan Frick
The TQM Magazine
Volume 12 . Number 5 . 2000 . 350±354
and the Rogaland Research Institute in early
1997. Questionnaires were sent to all 900
NFK member companies. All the informants
are quality managers in these companies. A
total of 363 replies were received, a return
rate of about 40 per cent. The sampled
companies include manufacturing companies
(180, 50 per cent), service companies (85, 23
per cent), public companies (47, 13 per cent),
and other types of organizations such as
research institutes and foundations (51, 14
per cent).
In this research, the 180 manufacturing
companies are used. Their sizes range from
less than 150 employees (51 per cent), to 150-
500 employees (31 per cent), to more than
500 employees (18 per cent).
Reliability and validity tests (Nunnally,
1978) were conducted. Based on the tests, 14
valid TQM factors (F1-F8), two performance
factors (F7 and F72) and one employee
involvement factor (EI) are identified as
shown in Table I. Data analysis described
below are based on these factors, which have a
mean of zero.
Results
Data analyses produce the following results as
shown in Table I.
EI and TQM (Q1)
EI is positively correlated with improvement
in business performance. Correlation
coefficients between EI and the 12 TQM
factors range from 0.2 to 0.5, all at the
significant level of 0.05 and 0.01, as shown in
Table I. This indicates that EI is highly
related to the implementation of TQM. There
are two explanations for this. One, EI will
enhance the implementation of TQM
programmes; and two, TQM programmes
provide opportunities for employees to be
involved.
EI and business performance (Q2)
The correlation between EI and business
performance is significant. However,
significant correlation was found only in the
high-EI group (0.39 and 0.35). This indicates
there is a learning-curve effect in EI. In other
Table I Means and correlation coefficients between participation, TQM and results
Correlation coefficients
High EI
(47 per cent)
Low EI
(53 per cent)
Factors Code Means EI F71 F72 F71 F72
Employee involvement EI 2.74 1.00 0.39** 0.35**
Leadership system F11 3.51 0.50** 0.35*
Citizenship F12 4.17 0.27** 0.32* 0.45*
Availability and use of quality information F21 3.32 0.41** 0.32*
Benchmarking F22 3.07 0.35** 0.30*
Strategic management F3 3.28 0.61** 0.47** 0.43*
Human resources development F41 3.02 0.65** 0.49**
Training F42 2.57 0.46**
Quality assurance F51 3.97 0.20* 0.32*
Design control F52 4.02 0.22*
Process control F53 3.62 0.40**
Supplier co-operation F61 3.39 0.37** 0.36* 0.32*
Supplier selection F62 2.96 0.37** 0.31*
Customer satisfaction F81 3.86 0.29** 0.50**
Customer feedback F82 3.62 0.29**
External performance F71
Internal performance F72
ISO-EI ISO 0.15 ±0.11 ±0.02 0.37 0.36
Non-ISO ±0.22 ±0.26 ±0.30 0.13 ±0.09
T-value 4.48 0.24 0.83 0.60 2.11
Significant 0.04 0.63 0.37 0.44 0.15
Notes: * Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed)** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed)
352
Employee involvement and quality management
Hongyi Sun, Ip Kee Hui, Agnes Y.K. Tam and Jan Frick
The TQM Magazine
Volume 12 . Number 5 . 2000 . 350±354
words, it takes time for the benefits to be
obvious.
EI and the contribution of TQM (Q3)
For this question, the sample was divided into
two groups by the mean of the degree of
employee involvement, i.e. high-EI and low-
EI. In the high-EI group, the correlation (0.31
and 0.50) between EI and performance
improvement is at the significant level of 0.01.
However, in the low-EI group, only two
significant correlation coefficients are noted.
It is concluded, therefore, that EI positively
influences the contribution of TQM. In other
words, TQM programmes accompanied by
EI tend to be more successful.
EI and ISO certificates (Q4)
The degree of EI is slightly different between
those companies with and without ISO 9000
certificates. The test of the difference is at the
level of 0.04, which indicates that there is
some positive relationship between ISO 9000
certification and EI. However, based on the
data in this research, it is still impossible to
determine which influences which. Juran and
Gryna (1988) believe that without EI, the
future of quality management and ISO 9000
certificates will be gloomy. However, the
current version of ISO 9000 does not cover
several key issues, such as quality goals in the
business plan, quality improvement at a
revolutionary rate, training in managing for
quality, and participation by the work force. It
is to be hoped that these issues will be
addressed in a future version of ISO 9000
standards.
EI and the contribution of ISO
certificates (Q5)
In either high- and low-EI there is no
significant difference in performance
improvement between companies with and
without ISO 9000 certificates. This indicates
that EI has no effect on the contribution of
ISO 9000 certificates to performance
improvement. However, this may be because
EI and ISO 9000 have not been well-
incorporated (cf. `̀ EI and ISO certificates'').
Discussions and implications
This research revealed that EI is positively
related to various aspects of quality
management and should be emphasized in
quality management programmes. The results
suggest that instead of implementing TQM
and EI as separate programmes, they should
be implemented in combination.
However, the `̀ means'' column in Table I
indicates that the average implementation of
EI is very low compared with other quality
management practices. Companies are
therefore recommended to pay more attention
to EI and to incorporate it with TQM. In
order to participate in the business, employees
at all levels must have power, information,
knowledge and rewards (Lawler et al., 1995),
all of which should be incorporated in quality
management programmes.
EI must, however, be implemented within
certain strategic contexts. It is meaningful
only after a strategic concept has been
established and communicated to all
employees. Employees need to share strategic
information to direct their efforts at the
operational level. It is the responsibility of top
management to evaluate customer value and
determine the company's goals and the task of
middle management to turn the goals into
operations tasks.
EI is a process for empowering members of
an organization to make decisions and to
solve problems appropriate to their levels in
the organization (Pace, 1989). To participate
effectively, employees must be given more
responsibility. This requires the delegation of
certain decision making and administrative
powers to employees at various levels.
Without the necessary power, EI cannot be
utilized for making continuous improvements
and will be limited to just making suggestions.
Increased involvement means more
responsibility, which in turn requires a higher
level of skills. Training should be provided to
allow employees to attain higher skills and
should include training in both techniques,
such as statistical methods, and managerial
skills in decision making, leadership, team
building, etc. Training is the essential part of
all quality programmes and it is relatively easy
to incorporate knowledge development with
TQM programmes.
Companies which implemented quality
management programmes must recognize
and reward quality improvement and better
customer service. The reward system should
provide incentives to motivate employees to
participate further. Performance-based,
individual and group-based payment systems,
business interests sharing, and gain-sharing
353
Employee involvement and quality management
Hongyi Sun, Ip Kee Hui, Agnes Y.K. Tam and Jan Frick
The TQM Magazine
Volume 12 . Number 5 . 2000 . 350±354
programmes, etc., are commonly used
incentive-based reward systems in successful
companies.
EI takes various forms, such as work teams,
job enrichment/rotation, quality circles, task
forces and labour-management action
(Bounds et al., 1994). However, quality
circles are the most common, with many
successful instances being reported. It is
suggested that companies use quality circles
as the first step in implementing EI.
Finally, management must hold a new
management philosophy and new attitude
towards employees. To implement EI,
management should hold the assumption that
employees are willing to contribute and be
able to contribute. The above implications are
summarised in a framework as shown in
Figure 2.
Conclusions
The research reported in this paper revealed
that EI contribute to various aspects of quality
management. The result supports the
proposition that EI is a prerequisite for TQM
and other quality management programmes.
To implement EI, management needs to
hold a new management philosophy and
new attitude towards employees and employees
should be provided with the necessary
authority, information, skills, and reward.
References
Beekun, R.I. (1990), `̀ Assessing the effectiveness of socio-technical interventions: anitdore or fad?'', HumanRelations, Vol. 42, pp. 887-97.
Bounds, G., Yorks, L., Adams, M. and Ranney, G. (1994),Beyond Total Quality Management: Towards theEmerging Paradigm, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
Cheng, S.P. and Tummala, V.M.R. (1998), `̀ An employeeinvolvement strategy for ISO 9000 registration andmaintenance: a case study for Hong Kong and Chinacompanies'', International Journal of Quality &Reliability Management, Vol. 15 No. 8, pp. 860-91.
Cooper, C., Dyck, B. and Frohlich, N. (1992), `̀ Improvingthe effectiveness of gainsharing: the role of fairnessand participation'', Administrative ScienceQuarterly, Vol. 376, pp. 471-90.
Curkovic, S. and Handfield, R. (1996), `̀ Use of ISO 9000and Baldrige Award criteria in supplier qualityevaluation'', International Journal of Purchasing andMaterials Management, Vol. 32 No. 2, pp. 2-12.
Evans, M.R. (1985), `̀ Opyland Hotel: managing Nashville'scomplete destination'', Cornell Hotel and RestaurantAdministration Quarterly, Vol. 25 No. 4, pp. 44-55.
Hogan, J.J. (1992), `̀ Turnover and what to do about it'',Cornell Hotel and Restaurant AdministrationQuarterly, Vol. 33 No. 1, pp. 40-45.
HR Focus (1993), January, pp. 1-4.Juran, J.M. and Gryna, F.M. (1988), Juran's Quality
Control Handbook, McGraw-Hill Book Company,New York, NY.
Kopelman, R.E. (1986), Managing Productivity inOrganizations, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
Lawler, E.E., Mohrman, S.A. and Ledford, E. (Ed.) (1995),Creating High Performance Organizations: Practicesand Results of Employee Involvement and TotalQuality Management in Fortune 1000 Companies,Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
Nunnally, J.C. (1978), Psychometric Theory, McGraw-Hill,New York, NY.
Pace, L.A. (1989), `̀ Motivation towards systemintegration'', Survey of Business, Vol. 25 No. 1,pp. 57-41.
Partlow, C.C. (1996), `̀ Human-resources practices of TQMhotels'', Cornell Hotel and RestaurantAdministration Quarterly, Vol. 37 No. 5, pp. 67-79.
Ross, J.E. (1994), Total Quality Management, Text, Casesand Readings, Kogan Page, London.
Solis, L.E.S., Rao, S., Raghu-Nathan, T.S., Chen, C. andPan, S. (1998), `̀ Quality management practices andquality results: a comparison of manufacturing andservice sectors in Taiwan'', Managing ServiceQuality, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 46-54.
Sun, H. (1999), `̀ An empirical study of TQM in Norway'',Total Quality Management, Vol. 10 No. 6,pp. 901-14.
Sundstrom, E., DeMeuse, K.P. and Futell, D. (1990), `̀ Workteams'', American Psychologist, Vol. 45, pp. 120-33.
Velury, J. (1996), `̀ ISO 900: focusing on quality systems'',Industrial Management, Vol. 38 No. 6, pp. 11-15.
Wilkinson, A. (1998), `̀ Empowerment: theory andpractice'', Personnel Review, Vol. 27 No. 1,pp. 40-56.
Wood, S. and Peccei, R. (1995), `̀ Does total qualitymanagement make a difference to employeeattitudes'', Employee Relations, Vol. 17 No. 3,pp. 52-62.
Figure 2 A managerial framework for employee involvement
Commentary
Extensive research results on the essential area of employee involvement.
354
Employee involvement and quality management
Hongyi Sun, Ip Kee Hui, Agnes Y.K. Tam and Jan Frick
The TQM Magazine
Volume 12 . Number 5 . 2000 . 350±354