8.25a p976 relinquishment report - oil and gas authority · · 2015-08-06relinquishment report...
TRANSCRIPT
Relinquishment Report for License P976 January 2010, Canamens Energy Ltd
1. Header
License Number P976
License Round Awarded 23 December 1998
License Type Traditional
Block number 8/25a
Operator (% share) Canamens Energy North Sea Ltd (50%)
Partner (% share) Nautical Petroleum plc (50%)
Work programme summary Original work commitment to acquire 3d
seismic, and to drill one well (8/20-1)
fulfilled by previous licensees. Well 8/25a-1
drilled in 2008 by current partners.
2. Synopsis
License P976 has been relinquished in full, approved by DECC with effective date 22 December 2009. This
document forms the relinquishment report requested by DECC in the acknowledgement letter of the
relinquishment. The reasons for relinquishment are
a. The Selkie prospect in the Dornoch level of the Tertiary section has been tested by well 8/25a-1,
and found to not be oil-bearing.
b. The remaining (untested) Kelpie prospect in the license is currently too small to be economic on its
own
c. The probability of finding oil at Kelpie has not risen significantly following intensive G&G work
d. Neighbouring licenses are considered to have only minor prospectivity, or minor discovered
volumes, and the probability of an economically-viable regional development appears low
The sister license to P976, which is P1643, has been operated by the same Canamens-Nautical partnership,
with a recent internal work program that integrates the two licenses. This second license has been
relinquished with the same effective date, and a second relinquishment report will be submitted.
3. Exploration Activities
a. Well 8/25a-1(Selkie)
The Selkie prospect, a subtle four way dip closure in late Paleocene sands, covering 14km2, was evaluated
to have a P50 oil in place volume of 220 mmbbl during 2007. With an AFE cost of £8.1m, well 8/25a-1 was
spudded by Transocean Prospect on 11th
May 2008. Operations concluded on 23rd
May, three days ahead
of schedule. The final well cost was £5.5m. The target was the Upper Dornoch sandstone, which was
encountered at 3470ft (mdbrt), within 5 feet of prognosis, with a drilled thickness of 133ft. There were no
hydrocarbon shows. Subsequent geochemical analysis of the cuttings by Fugro Robertson revealed no
traces of hydrocarbon, suggesting failure was likely due to lack of hydrocarbon charge. Subsequent seismic
interpretation showed the possibility of crestal extensional faulting in the reservoir and top seal levels, and
a possible additional reason for failure may be incomplete top seal. Petrophysical interpretation of well
logs showed minor hydrocarbon saturation in the overlying Mousa Formation sands, interpreted to
correlate with zones of oil-based mud loss. The Dornoch section as a whole is sandy, with 120ft of 71% net
sand separated by an internal flooding surface from a lower sandy section of 910ft of 92% net sand.
Porosity is constant at 28%.
b. Partial relinquishment
The western part of this license, covering the dry Selkie structure, was relinquished with effective date 15
December 2008, due to no evaluated remaining prospectivity (Figure 1). Licence partners Canamens and
Nautical were awarded the part of 8/25 that lies further west and north than Selkie during early 2009, and
the fallow 9/21 Skipper discovery that had been included in their application was awarded to other
companies. The failure of Selkie during the extended license round decision process, and the award of
Skipper to others, were heavy blows to the development potential of the 8/25 area.
c. Seismic interpretation
During 2009 the Operator re-evaluated prospectivity in the remaining part of 8/25a together with 8/25b
and western 9/21. The 3d seismic survey that Agip and partners acquired during 1999 was reinterpreted at
reservoir level, and integrated with Selkie well information to assess the remaining potential of the Kelpie
prospect (described below, and Figure 3), as well as the Coelacanth prospect in 8/25b described in the
P1643 relinquishment report. A map at top reservoir level is shown as Figure 2, and a seismic line linking
Selkie and Kelpie as Figure 3.
d. Seismic reprocessing
As part of the work commitment on P1643, 100km2 of the Agip 3d survey was reprocessed by Fugro
Seismic Imaging. Part of the reprocessed area lies within P976. The reprocessing flow and results are
described in the relinquishment report for that license.
4. Prospectivity Analysis
a. Play description
Play Wells targeted at play &
results
Comments
Maureen
Sandstone
9/21-1, 9/21-2, 8/20-1.
All dry holes at Maureen
level
Reservoir level pinches out westwards in eastern 8/25a, with a
remaining untested stratigraphic concept play there. Maureen sands
extend further west along the NW-SE trending Skipper channel. Play
successful in Mariner. Original operator of both Mariner and 9/21
blocks was Unocal. Maureen Sandstone appears not to be charged in
the area, although were these wells all on valid closures?
Upper
Dornoch
Sandstone
8/25a-1 dry hole -
Prospect was not
charged, although there
may also be topseal
issues
9/21-2 serendipitously discovered oil in this play. 9/21-1 had shows in
Beauly Sandstone.
To further pursue this play in the block requires derisking of the one
remaining prospect at Upper Dornoch level, Kelpie, incorporating a
greater understanding of migration pathways (see below).
Mousa
Sandstone
None in immediate area This play has worked in 9/16 block to the north. 9/26-1 to south has
shows. Play not yet evaluated in 8/25a. Probability that any
hydrocarbons at this level will be heavier than 9/21-2. Pursuit of this
play would require new work
Heimdal
Sandstone
Secondary objective in
8/20-1 (dry hole).
Probable topseal problems; requires intra formational seal. This type
of play is not usually successful, however, claystones of 200ft or more
can provide intra formational seals in some areas of the East Shetland
Platform. This play has not been evaluated by Canamens or Nautical.
b. Hydrocarbon migration study
A detailed modelling study was undertaken by Fugro Robertson for the partnership during 2009, designed
to predict hydrocarbon migration pathways across much of the East Shetland Platform, in the light of oil
discovery at Skipper and a dry hole at Selkie. The study remains confidential in general, but suggests that
migration from the graben is likely to have been directed north westwards through Skipper and updip from
there through northern 8/25 and along the 8/20-1 long-lived channel axis. Oil would therefore likely not
reach Selkie or Kelpie, which lie south of this migration path. An excerpt map from the regional model is
shown as Figure 4. The study also suggested that any oil found at Kelpie would be heavy, with API of
around 11.
c. Chance of success at Kelpie
Reservoir Dornoch sand presence extremely likely 0.9
Source Long distance lateral migration from graben proven at Skipper, but absent
at Selkie. Migration studies suggest Kelpie is bypassed
0.4
Trap Low-amplitude 4-way dip closure is likely present; depth conversion is
important
0.8
Top seal T45 top seal has significant variation in offset wells and also in seismic
character: unpredictable
0.7
Kelpie has an estimated chance of success of 20%, and appears difficult to de-risk further.
5. Kelpie Reserves Summary
Gross thickness 100-120-140ft GRV above spill 5.35x107 m
3
Net:Gross 65-71-75% Closing contour 1080m
Porosity 25-27-30% STOOIP 32.8 – 46.7 – 66.6 mmbbl
Expansion Factor 1.03-1.05-1.10 Recovery factor 15-18-20%
Water saturation 20-30-40% Recoverable 8.4 mmbbl
6. Maps and Figures
8/25b
relinq
8/25a Skipper
selkie
kelpie
8/25c
Figure 1: P976 occupies the non-relinquished part of block 8/25a and contains the Kelpie prospect
line of Figure 3
Figure 2: top Dornoch
(i.e. top reservoir) map
No 3d south of this line
Figure 3: Seismic line from Agip 1998 3d survey, linking Selkie and Kelpie structures.
Figure 4: Extract from regional migration modelling study, showing dark green flow lines focussing
westwards from the area of hydrocarbon generation below the Beryl embayment of the Viking Graben,
updip into the Skipper accumulation, and then continuing northwards. The Selkie and Kelpie prospects are
bypassed by migration along lower Tertiary carriers, according to this modelling exercise.
7. Clearance
The submitting operator confirms that DECC is free to publish and that all 3rd
party ownership rights (on
any contained data and/or interpretations) have been considered and appropriately cleared for publication
purposes.
Top Dornoch
Base Tertiary
Selkie structure
with 8/25a-1
gamma log
Kelpie
prospect
North west South east