8 th grade eog data analysis 1 may 2014. two ways to measure performance 1. proficiency – how did...

23
8 th grade EOG Data Analysis 1 May 2014

Upload: beatrix-flowers

Post on 18-Jan-2016

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 8 th grade EOG Data Analysis 1 May 2014. Two Ways to Measure Performance 1. Proficiency – How did students perform compared to a set of standards 2. Growth

8th grade EOG Data Analysis

1 May 2014

Page 2: 8 th grade EOG Data Analysis 1 May 2014. Two Ways to Measure Performance 1. Proficiency – How did students perform compared to a set of standards 2. Growth

Two Ways to Measure Performance

1. Proficiency – How did students perform compared to a set of standards

2. Growth – How did teachers’ students improve relative to their peers across the state

• Exceeds Expected Growth • Meets Expected Growth • Does Not Meet Expected Growth

Page 3: 8 th grade EOG Data Analysis 1 May 2014. Two Ways to Measure Performance 1. Proficiency – How did students perform compared to a set of standards 2. Growth

Grade 5 Science Grade 8 Science

WCPS 0.285 0.463

NC 0.454 0.591

5.0%

15.0%

25.0%

35.0%

45.0%

55.0%

65.0%

75.0%

85.0%

95.0%

EOG Science: 2012-2013

WCPSNC

1. Proficiency

-17

-13

Page 4: 8 th grade EOG Data Analysis 1 May 2014. Two Ways to Measure Performance 1. Proficiency – How did students perform compared to a set of standards 2. Growth

English II Math I Biology

WCPS 0.383 0.317 0.354

NC 0.512 0.363 0.456

5.0%

15.0%

25.0%

35.0%

45.0%

55.0%

65.0%

75.0%

85.0%

95.0%

EOC Tests: 2012-2013

WCPSNC

-10

1. Proficiency

Page 5: 8 th grade EOG Data Analysis 1 May 2014. Two Ways to Measure Performance 1. Proficiency – How did students perform compared to a set of standards 2. Growth

All Male Fe-male

White Black His-panic

Am In-dian

Aisan Pac Is-lander

Multi-Racial

Econ Disadv

Not Econ

Disadv

Lim Eng Prof

Mi-grant

Stu-dens w/

Disab

WCPS 0.373 0.402 0.341 0.505 0.225 0.327 0.375 0.692 NaN 0.452 0.288 0.526 0.118 0.2 0.198

NC 0.522 0.542 0.501 0.647 0.326 0.395 0.399 0.705 0.524 0.541 0.376 0.695 0.164 0.251 0.206

5.0%

15.0%

25.0%

35.0%

45.0%

55.0%

65.0%

75.0%

85.0%

95.0%

Percentage of Students Who Passed Science Tests: 2012-2013

WCPSNC

1. Proficiency

Page 6: 8 th grade EOG Data Analysis 1 May 2014. Two Ways to Measure Performance 1. Proficiency – How did students perform compared to a set of standards 2. Growth

Elementary/Grade School: Achievement Calculation

5&8 Science% Proficient

3-8 Math% Proficient

3-8 Reading % Proficient

Biology % Proficient

English II % Proficient

Math I % Proficient

# of Available Indicators

+ + + + += Points

46.3%(72/167)

33.8% (169/500)

33.4%(167/500)

0%(0/0)

0%(0/0)

0%(0/0)

3

+ + + + += 37.8

1. Proficiency

Science avg.

Page 7: 8 th grade EOG Data Analysis 1 May 2014. Two Ways to Measure Performance 1. Proficiency – How did students perform compared to a set of standards 2. Growth

Exceeds Expected Growth

Meets Expected Growth

Does Not Meet Expected Growth

Growth Index Greater than 2

Growth Index Between 2 and -2

Growth Index Less than -2

Teacher Growth Index Levels

2. Growth

(From EVAAS)

Page 8: 8 th grade EOG Data Analysis 1 May 2014. Two Ways to Measure Performance 1. Proficiency – How did students perform compared to a set of standards 2. Growth

WCPS

NC

5% 15% 25% 35% 45% 55% 65% 75% 85% 95%WCPS NC

Exceeds 15% 23%

Meets 58% 56%

Does Not Meet 27% 21%

15%

23%

58%

56%

27%

21%

Percentage of Teachers Within Each Growth Index Level

Evaluation Composites: 2012-2013

ExceedsMeetsDoes Not Meet

2. Growth

Page 9: 8 th grade EOG Data Analysis 1 May 2014. Two Ways to Measure Performance 1. Proficiency – How did students perform compared to a set of standards 2. Growth

WCPS

NC

5% 15% 25% 35% 45% 55% 65% 75% 85% 95%WCPS NC

Exceeds 13% 18%

Meets 60% 64%

Does Not Meet 28% 17%

13%

18%

60%

64%

28%

17%

Percentage of Teachers Within Each Growth Index Level

Math: 20121-2013

ExceedsMeetsDoes Not Meet

2. Growth

Page 10: 8 th grade EOG Data Analysis 1 May 2014. Two Ways to Measure Performance 1. Proficiency – How did students perform compared to a set of standards 2. Growth

WCPS

NC

5% 15% 25% 35% 45% 55% 65% 75% 85% 95%WCPS NC

Exceeds 7% 9%

Meets 86% 83%

Does Not Meet 7% 8%

7%

9%

86%

83%

7%

8%

Percentage of Teachers Within Each Growth Level Reading / Language Arts: 2012-2013

ExceedsMeetsDoes Not Meet

2. Growth

Page 11: 8 th grade EOG Data Analysis 1 May 2014. Two Ways to Measure Performance 1. Proficiency – How did students perform compared to a set of standards 2. Growth

WCPS

NC

5% 15% 25% 35% 45% 55% 65% 75% 85% 95%WCPS NC

Exceeds 13% 27%

Meets 42% 47%

Does Not Meet 0.458333333333333 0.263298315824579

13%

27%

42%

47%

Percentage of Teachers Within Each Growth Index Level Science: 2012-2013

ExceedsMeetsDoes Not Meet

2. Growth

Page 12: 8 th grade EOG Data Analysis 1 May 2014. Two Ways to Measure Performance 1. Proficiency – How did students perform compared to a set of standards 2. Growth

8.68

Exc

eeds

3.28

Exc

eeds

2.63

Exc

eeds

1.78

Mee

ts-0

.68

Mee

ts-0

.74

Mee

ts-1

.12

Mee

ts-1

.53

Mee

ts-1

.61

Mee

ts-2

.08

Doe

s N

ot M

eet

-3.2

8D

oes

Not

Mee

t-3

.68

Doe

s N

ot M

eet

-3.9

Doe

s N

ot M

eet

-4.9

Doe

s N

ot M

eet

-5.1

2D

oes

Not

Mee

t-7

.14

Doe

s N

ot M

eet

Average = -19.4

8th Grade Science (2012-2013)

19% 38% 44%

2. Growth

Page 13: 8 th grade EOG Data Analysis 1 May 2014. Two Ways to Measure Performance 1. Proficiency – How did students perform compared to a set of standards 2. Growth

Last year’s District EOG results

Physical Science 26.7 -4.2 Matter: Properties and Change 16.7 -4.6 Energy: Conservation and Transfer 10.0 -3.5Earth Science 25.0 -6.2 Earth Systems, Structures, Processes 13.3 -5.0 Earth History 11.7 -7.5Life Science 48.3 -7.1 Structures and Functions of Living Org. 17.2 -7.3 Ecosystems 11.1 -4.9 Evolution and Genetics 13.3 -8.5 Molecular Biology 6.7 -7.4

% of testDiff from

State Mean1. Proficiency

Page 14: 8 th grade EOG Data Analysis 1 May 2014. Two Ways to Measure Performance 1. Proficiency – How did students perform compared to a set of standards 2. Growth

assignment• Materials: Goal Summary Report

Released test (2013)EOG analysis worksheetScience Essential Standards doc.Unpacked Standards doc.

1. Find lowest two areas on Report2. Find which questions these correlate to on

released test. (Unifying Concepts in answer key)

3. Determine which Clarifying Objective correlates to each question.

4. Summarize the questions on worksheet.5. Submit copies of worksheets.

On WCPSScience Website

Page 15: 8 th grade EOG Data Analysis 1 May 2014. Two Ways to Measure Performance 1. Proficiency – How did students perform compared to a set of standards 2. Growth

Physical Science 26.7 -4.2 Matter: Properties and Change 16.7 -4.6 Energy: Conservation and Transfer 10.0 -3.5Earth Science 25.0 -6.2 Earth Systems, Structures, Processes 13.3 -5.0 Earth History 11.7 -7.5Life Science 48.3 -7.1 Structures and Functions of Living Org. 17.2 -7.3 Ecosystems 11.1 -4.9 Evolution and Genetics 13.3 -8.5 Molecular Biology 6.7 -7.4

% of testDiff from

State Mean

1. Find lowest two areasScience Grade 8 Goal Summary Report

Page 16: 8 th grade EOG Data Analysis 1 May 2014. Two Ways to Measure Performance 1. Proficiency – How did students perform compared to a set of standards 2. Growth

2. Find which numbers correlate

Page 17: 8 th grade EOG Data Analysis 1 May 2014. Two Ways to Measure Performance 1. Proficiency – How did students perform compared to a set of standards 2. Growth

3. Determine which Clarifying Objective

Page 18: 8 th grade EOG Data Analysis 1 May 2014. Two Ways to Measure Performance 1. Proficiency – How did students perform compared to a set of standards 2. Growth

Unifying Concept

Essential Standards document

Page 19: 8 th grade EOG Data Analysis 1 May 2014. Two Ways to Measure Performance 1. Proficiency – How did students perform compared to a set of standards 2. Growth

Unpacked Standards document

Newest version

Page 20: 8 th grade EOG Data Analysis 1 May 2014. Two Ways to Measure Performance 1. Proficiency – How did students perform compared to a set of standards 2. Growth

3. Determine which Clarifying Objective

8.E.2.1

8.E.2.2

Page 21: 8 th grade EOG Data Analysis 1 May 2014. Two Ways to Measure Performance 1. Proficiency – How did students perform compared to a set of standards 2. Growth

4. Summarize the questions on worksheet.

Page 22: 8 th grade EOG Data Analysis 1 May 2014. Two Ways to Measure Performance 1. Proficiency – How did students perform compared to a set of standards 2. Growth

Potential snag with printed Released test

• A few question items show up Online Only• Download the Online test from WCPS

science page

Page 23: 8 th grade EOG Data Analysis 1 May 2014. Two Ways to Measure Performance 1. Proficiency – How did students perform compared to a set of standards 2. Growth

5. Submit copies of worksheets.

• Teachers submit to Grade Science Chair

• Chair sends to Andy Forsleff @ C/O after collecting all